Chapter 7 - Video Lessons: www.video-tutor.net/atomic-structure.html
@monkeytrollhunter3 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love it when we're asked how to do stuff that were never taught in lecture
@ethangjervik45262 жыл бұрын
every single time
@NoName-yf3fb2 жыл бұрын
Every damn lesson
@okthen91452 жыл бұрын
Yep. Those teachers have absolutely no business collecting their paychecks. It makes me so mad they get paid to s**t all over science.
@en_tub32 жыл бұрын
Mhmm!
@nightteen52302 жыл бұрын
U devil😂 same as me too😈
@hornelladiaquiese80084 жыл бұрын
I wrote a Chemistry test about a month ago, based on ionization energy and I watched only this video before taking the test and believe it or not, I got an A+ (100%) for that test... I am so happy and grateful to you for making chemistry less complicated than everyone, including lecturer, makes it seem. Thank you so much! God Bless.
@anthonyrojas99894 жыл бұрын
These lectures get through to my soul man, I'm serious. I cannot keep up with my professor's pace, but your videos clarify everything.
@trikebeatstrexnodiff4 жыл бұрын
Exactly! I dont understand anything what my teachers "teach" but thanks to this man and his language, it helps me learn what I am not very able to learn in my native language and that's wonderful but also terrifying cos I just figured out that I dont understand a subject in my native language but understand in english :(
@dilanidassanayake88845 жыл бұрын
Sir your explanations are more than perfect you make chemistry so interesting. Thank you very much sir for working hard to produce these videos .May GOD bless you, I am forever grateful to you.
@潘御麟4 жыл бұрын
I agree with you
@1nesh9564 жыл бұрын
how you act one day before Chem Finals and see this vid
@潘御麟4 жыл бұрын
hahahaha How do you know my Chemistry final is coming
@dilanidassanayake88843 жыл бұрын
@@idkwhttosay912 lol
@Jimmy-rg1vd3 жыл бұрын
Not only in chemistry but also perfect in mathematics and physics
@eri42326 жыл бұрын
I cant thank you enough, I had no hope for my chemistry As Level but thanks to you i can finally understand what my school failed to do, I hope eveything amazing comes your way.
@chrissysher06803 жыл бұрын
dude im studying for my As level rn as well..... well 2 years later than u
@scarlett65413 жыл бұрын
@@chrissysher0680 me too! i just started my AS levels a few months ago
@sophiaouchari27853 жыл бұрын
@@scarlett6541 keep us updated lolol
@nick2aim4313 жыл бұрын
@@chrissysher0680 how was it bro
@hasoonnine Жыл бұрын
@@nick2aim431probably not good since they never replied
@merkive5 жыл бұрын
my lecturer is a doctor, you and her have the same tone to your voice, constant. But the thing is I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE TEACHING thank god
@wafIeeeАй бұрын
how r u doing in life now?
@friday80914 жыл бұрын
I love your teaching. I really appreciate it. You are gifted and also have perfect voice- warm, clear, right speed, clear explanation.
@irlbrisa77755 жыл бұрын
2x speed for finals
@jackcorcoran21074 жыл бұрын
amen to that one
@AR-vb4xy4 жыл бұрын
I use 1.5x and 1.75x lol
@lizbethrodriguez21224 жыл бұрын
I'm so scareddd
@ethio-juvenilechannel81163 жыл бұрын
I think 1.5 is better
@ivanvalverde70183 жыл бұрын
Amen😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@natburns13002 жыл бұрын
This man is single-handedly saving my grades in Chem
@torb696 жыл бұрын
i hope there will be more people like you in the future
@gadisaketema21993 жыл бұрын
here i am in 2021
@jaipalsingh37126 жыл бұрын
The last example u gave ... Was the most difficult for me to identify untill I watched your video... Thanks for such a good explanation
@Shimry3 жыл бұрын
Your explanations are so crystal clear and iam so grateful for your teaching. Thank You so much Sir! for this and for making it free for us to learn. Means a lot!
@georgesadler78306 ай бұрын
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for a Basic Introduction/Explanation into Ionization Energy in AP/General Chemistry. Once again, the practice problems/problem selections are off the learning charts from start to finish. This is an error free video/lecture on KZbin TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
@eikigbecharles48774 жыл бұрын
Once In a life time polymath, and best teacher ever
@melissajade77173 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this so easy to understand!!! I'm honestly blown away at how easy it was for me to catch onto this. I went here to understand why ionization isn't used more as a clean propulsion method. Now I truly see why it's such a task. But I won't stop. Those noisy propellers will be a thing of the past! I'm going to build a prototype ion propulsion system for future AVs. Thanks for your time, and explanation. I'll subscribe to the rest of your lessons.
@lluuccasexperiencia73733 ай бұрын
How has this gone? Any progress?
@Free.palestine8 Жыл бұрын
I understood your lessons more than my professor even I'm not good at English Because of the difference in language. Good efforts ☺️🌸
@Sammi-nm8bg5 жыл бұрын
I luv u mr. organic chemistry tutor theres no words as to how much i appreciate u
@meadowfraser10335 жыл бұрын
where are you getting these values my guy
@andrewsummer35213 жыл бұрын
Periodic table
@youssef-27193 жыл бұрын
You can found it in general chamistry book
@AryanSingh-ju6wn3 жыл бұрын
google
@torresthemonster Жыл бұрын
20:19
@BigcatTVGaming4 жыл бұрын
I wish I could like this more than once. So helpful
@NaomiKatuta-kp1wj7 ай бұрын
Ohh my God,am ready for my exam now.May God richly bless you
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
This is such an amazing channel and series of videos. More people need to have their ion you 😎
@aphilemdluli Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, sir. You explain so perfectly. I am very grateful for the time you take to make these videos.
@gladysnnabugo2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your videos you make chemistry less complicated for me I really appreciate your hard work
@bobb98012 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, words cant describe how grateful I am to you.
@skykrasher44754 жыл бұрын
I have a Chem test tomorrow and I was legit about to have a panic attack because I could not figure this out. Thanks for helping me!
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
How did it go?
@skykrasher44753 жыл бұрын
@@PunmasterSTP well I passed out in the middle of studying from stress but I got an A so it was fucking worth it
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
@@skykrasher4475 I’m sorry you passed out, but I’m glad you got an A!
@shreyasimaiti16546 жыл бұрын
Great explaination.... I love it now it is very clear this can only possible because of so many examples
@tanjiharahman2291Ай бұрын
Thanks dude! U went pretty dept in every details but I just needed 1st 5 mins.
@rocroc Жыл бұрын
Ionization energy - is a measure of the capability of an element to enter into chemical reactions requiring ion formation or donation of electrons. It is also generally related to the nature of the chemical bonding in the compounds formed by the elements.
@marin47675 жыл бұрын
where are you getting those values?
@evanhughes69525 жыл бұрын
If you’re taking a course, your teacher will likely have provided you with a chart. If not, you can look one up. It’s all based on experimental evidence.
@Nonary-j8g2 ай бұрын
Woo we have to memorixe the entire chart because they wont let us use the chart which was made so people wouldnt have to memorize this during the university exam
@Nonary-j8g2 ай бұрын
Sucks that there doesnt seem to be a way to find the kj/mol without just knowing it
@charlesoluwajoba78383 жыл бұрын
Your voice makes the video good!!😁
@regnas78686 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Well explained. Thank you.
@cashuur103 жыл бұрын
Teacher thanks I'm from Somalia 🇸🇴 when watching this lesson very very I understood this lesson thanks much Than I gave you subscrip and like
@randomb2367 Жыл бұрын
these are the best study videos
@RahulgoswamiRahul-vi6xo3 ай бұрын
Thank you sir ❤🎉
@luyolocollen4053 жыл бұрын
sir thanks you explain everything well.
@ayadilova4 жыл бұрын
Thx very much, this video is much more understandable!!
@binichi_4 жыл бұрын
you actually said all the questions i had to ask
@nithik._.senpai22574 жыл бұрын
simply amazing!
@fernandocruz98825 жыл бұрын
this was a great explanation
@yq90916 жыл бұрын
thx a lot . ur explanation is so accurate to the point. really hleps alot 😄
@kmccorristonrocks5 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for this!!
@okthen91452 жыл бұрын
Yea my teacher couldn't be bothered to explain the simplicity of the discontinuity. He acts like this level chemistry is advanced hyper rocket science and us lowlifes don't technically deserve to be in his presence. SMC chemistry is taught by old gatekeeping boomers who ruin the sciences. Thank you for actually treating us students with some decorum and respect.
@akoterryeyong8259 Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much sir 🙏✌️✨ Since I entered form one I have been using your lessons and explations to write my exams. Thanks so much sir❤
@marisasanders67565 жыл бұрын
On a test when we are not given a periodic table with the ionization energies on them, how would I be able to know different exceptions to the rule?
@AbishAlisher4 жыл бұрын
i think there is contradiction. 19:00 the more the electron is stable, the more ionization energy it requires to remove it. im judjing by your drawings and explanations.
@fl6rence4 жыл бұрын
I realized that as well thanks for pointing it out
@ev65644 жыл бұрын
Thanks for pointing that out! Since distance from nucleus and energy needed to remove an electron are directly proportional, I guess it would be instability/repelling of the electrons ↑ ionization energy ↓ distance from nucleus ↓. I'll correct that in my notes.
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
I definitely think this was confusing. If I understand correctly, he was referring to the intrinsic energy of the electron and *not* the ionization energy. If an electron is in a more stable (and lower energy) state, then it would take *more* energy to ionize it (rip it away from the atom).
@anonymoussender32983 жыл бұрын
I don't understand a single thing, like how tf did u get those numbers🧐
@MOHAMEDSOLIMAN-o3x2 ай бұрын
RIGHT??? he just pulling them outta no where
@user-ic5hi9fg3g2 ай бұрын
Theyre calculated using mathematical formulas
@altheacuenca5365Ай бұрын
@@user-ic5hi9fg3g we wanted to know how🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
@sakibaebadat65610 күн бұрын
I think he got it from the booklet
@christopheromoya535 Жыл бұрын
You laid a very strong foundation on IE in me......
@jumanaal-baalawi49294 жыл бұрын
You are so much better than my teacher
@PurityMutinta-zd4re Жыл бұрын
We really appreciate you 😊
@richardc81896 жыл бұрын
watch at 1.25x speed
@karinarinarina6 жыл бұрын
1.5 w/ the captions on does enough lol
@fota54065 жыл бұрын
1.75 is working just fine for me, if I use 2.0 then I'll need captions on for sure.
@evanhughes69525 жыл бұрын
I love that he talks so slowly and clearly when I’m doing my first round on a tricky topic, but I love that I can speed him up, too. I didn’t know I could do this. Thanks for the heads up.
@fkncompton71244 жыл бұрын
2.0x is usually fine for review but I think he talks faster than others so I have to hit rewind sometimes
@ev65644 жыл бұрын
I watch at 1.5x, especially for the videos closer to an hour long.
@boluwatifedavid-q2g10 күн бұрын
How do you know the ionization energy of all the elements? Is there a way to find it? Does it have to be measured?
@juniordachaser71775 жыл бұрын
Quality videos you can trust.
@davidkeyes12054 жыл бұрын
Quick question: Is it incorrect to say that there is more shielding with Na than Li because the effective nuclear charge is the same? If so, then that would mean the only reason why Li has greater ionization energy is that it has less distance from the nucleus. Thanks!
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
I think you’re right. Usually when I’ve heard about shielding, it’s in the context of moving across a row of the periodic table. Doing that, the shielding from the inner electrons stays constant but the nuclear charge increases, so the atom size generally decreases and the ionization energy generally increases.
@bharatlalratre2 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir for making it clear
@ethangreenberg21075 жыл бұрын
I'm in 6th grade and working on 8th this really helped
@qusayjamous34313 жыл бұрын
good on you
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
That’s awesome! I hope your studies are going well.
@dagmwitmelkamu94703 жыл бұрын
what is that mean pair and unpaired electron you got make everything crystal clear
@nila61004 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@sbusisoquintin80044 жыл бұрын
This man who's talking in this video looks like nothing he doesn't know sometimes...😊😊😊 That includes mathematics, technology even science
@osmondlin624211 ай бұрын
note that +2 will be oxidation state, so it should 2+ as a charge when you write it on the upper right
@saptahadilesmana67193 жыл бұрын
Why ionization energy measured in gases phase ?
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
I might be mistaken, but I think it’s easier to measure the ionization of gases. Also, if you’re putting in enough energy to rip electrons off of atoms, I imagine that things might melt and boil anyway…
@reecechetty30853 жыл бұрын
Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank youuuuuuuuu
@a.b.williams48882 жыл бұрын
Where do you get the ionization energy numbers in kj/mol that’s the part I’m confused about
@vivianjoseph814 Жыл бұрын
Great video, but could you pls explain why Al+3 has more IE than Al+2 even though it is jumping from p to s sublevel for Al+2?
@nityaverma174 жыл бұрын
What books do you use? Can you please tell I need recomendations for studying purposes
@godoliyastube-z4c2 жыл бұрын
thank you😀🙏🙏🙏🙏
@unknown-st8vq4 ай бұрын
Thank you so much sir
@Madu4ify3 жыл бұрын
U are the best love you !!!!!
@SamMalon6 ай бұрын
Sir! Please can you please explain why some elements show variable valencies 🙏
@nurfatihahzakaria3286 жыл бұрын
what apps did you use to make this video?
@WhereWhatWhenWhy7 ай бұрын
My problem is how did you find the values of the ionization energy? Where are the numbers being made from?
@ChristianEvans-u2p Жыл бұрын
There is something I don't understand from your explanation in I. E (this particular video). Here, you said the reason why the first ionisation energy of Mg2+ is bigger than the ionisation energy of Al3+ is because there is a decrease inionisation energy whenever there is a move from the S-block to the P-block , but why didn't this works for Be (beryllium) and fluorine, where Be with electronic configuration ending with 2S² (S-Block), while the fluorine ending with 2p5 (P-block)
@MECT8974 ай бұрын
Hats off sirr
@shaikhmarianazim13744 жыл бұрын
How can distance decrease if energy has decreased???
@joupoes60923 жыл бұрын
Hi, to cationise a ion (P -3) won’t it require more energy coz it’s already stable?
@Wkashif1111 Жыл бұрын
Do we need to memorize the energies and the exceptions in the periods??
@daliasaker70675 жыл бұрын
Is the nuclear charge means the positive protons or the negative electrons
@supernova12885 жыл бұрын
nuclear charge is the total positive charge in the nucleus of an atom
@daliasaker70674 жыл бұрын
Thank you 💝
@millerlynb.catakaw46485 жыл бұрын
How did you get the values of Ionization energy? I am kinda confuse here.
@rwayle5 жыл бұрын
He looked them up. They have to be determined experimentally.
@nikopivac86423 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@Li010183 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro!
@vedarovski41106 жыл бұрын
I dont get the P-2 and P-3 example. Ionization Energy of P-3 looks more to me because it is 18 electrons.
@zlidyh56 жыл бұрын
The amount of ionization energy needed to remove an electron increases as you remove more electrons. P-2 has 2 extra electrons while P-3 has 3 extra electrons, so in a way P-2 has "removed" one more electron than P-3.
@mht49084 жыл бұрын
@@zlidyh5 but doesn't p3- have a noble gas configuration (Ar) and p2- has the configuration of Cl? Typically noble gas configurations require the highest ionization energy, and looking at 15:31 the ionization energy for Cl is lower than Ar, so shouldn't p3- have the higher IE?
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
@@mht4908 I think things can be confusing because usually only the *first* ionization energies are talked about. While it’s true that ripping one electron off of an electrically neutral argon atom would require more energy than ripping one electron off a neutral chlorine atom, ripping the *second* electron off of a (now positive) argon atom would require even more energy. You can take a look at the different ionization energies here ( en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molar_ionization_energies_of_the_elements ). And also, by removing electrons from a negative ion (anion), you’d be reducing the electrostatic repulsion and making things more stable, which would help to decrease the ionization energies.
@irenesanil308 Жыл бұрын
U r a real saver❤😂
@Sanchou72 жыл бұрын
If an unpaired electron is more stable, why does Mg has bigger ionization energy than Na?
@Pinkshark27 Жыл бұрын
im really confused on this
@betul-ev2fu4 жыл бұрын
*thank you!!*
@bestrong65177 жыл бұрын
I'm looking for a analytical chemistry books!! Do you have any recommendations?? Please 🙏🏻
@battleaxesam60426 жыл бұрын
Schaum's analytical chemistry
@nanayawnuako84157 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@nouranmoustafa90365 жыл бұрын
You are blessing from god
@ayanga0016 жыл бұрын
thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@oparathelma406210 ай бұрын
Does e- mean ionisation energy like a constant?
@lalaineevangelista61784 жыл бұрын
How do you calculate the KJ/Mol?
@grim7.624 жыл бұрын
Futang ina modules fak yo
@grim7.624 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHA
@9myst1c213 жыл бұрын
where do you get these values or whatever it is?????????
@carolannnn10 ай бұрын
But how do you even get the first ionization of 780 kj/mol?? everyone seems to skip that part and show no equation.
@Patrick-fs8dc3 жыл бұрын
thank you
@Hect-se9ht4 жыл бұрын
so am i right when i say this. I am answering a question, the question is why the jump from the second to the third ionization energy higher than the third and fourth ionization energy? It is easier to remove a 3p electron than a 3s electron because the 3p electron is the furthest from the nucleus so it decreases and also the shielding decreases which makes it easier for the valence electron to get attracted to the nucleus because there are less electrons now that will repel the valence electron
@annh3164 жыл бұрын
What do thé 3p and 2s mean I’m so confused
@xuanyidu32594 жыл бұрын
studying this at midnight
@cheaire Жыл бұрын
i think u made a mistake at 18:30 (?) isnt the more stable an orbit, the greater its IE? you said P with 1060 has less energy than S with 1005
@leahm38423 жыл бұрын
I genuinely owe you my degree
@PunmasterSTP3 жыл бұрын
I’m just curious; what degree are you getting/did you get?