IPv6 Static Routing | Cisco CCNA 200-301

[@zikobht6618]

Hey I just wanna say Thank you from the bottom of my heart! you just gave me back my passion for networking, after studying for the CCNA for more than 5 months I just got overwhelmed and stopped for 5 weeks and I was second guessing passing it at all. One video from your amazing channel was enough for me to get back onto the track!! It is not the simplicity of your explanation but the awesome energy you bring into the mix and your dedication to put the efforts to make sure most of us understand and actually enjoy it!! May Allah bless you and bring success and happiness towards you and all your loved ones Mr Barker

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you @zikobht6618!

[@zoltron30]

Hi Keith, I couldn't comment on your old ipv6 videos so I decided to comment here. You make IPv6 so simple to understand compared to Cisco press. Thank you so much. I follow the hands on that you do in my lab and I certainly feel more confident now. God bless you and your family.

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you zoltron30!

[@paulmcjannet8983]

I love when the pros make mistakes in real-time. Seeing the troubleshooting/thought process behind it are really educational, especially when explained properly. Love the content Keith!!

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you Paul McJannet!

[@inkbythebarrelandpaperbyth6905]

You and Jeremy need a raise!

[@LemurJovian]

thanks for the free video mate. you seem like a real sweetheart on top of being a great teacher

[@KeithBarker]

Happy to help!

[@Typidica]

Me: "I think i'll break down my revision into small chunks" Kieth: *Makes a 2.5 hour video just for IPv6 static routing alone*

[@KeithBarker]

😔 Sometimes that happens. :)

[@Typidica]

@@KeithBarker lol thanks though the videos are well explained

[@cleversonsantos7551]

Your networking content is always great, thanks for that!

[@KeithBarker]

I appreciate that!

[@brutusjackendy3658]

I wanna like this video so many times... I literally watched so many videos prior to this one and I couldn't find a solution with my lab. This one just brought me the exact thing I was looking for👍👍👍👍👍

[@KeithBarker]

Happy to do it, thanks for the feedback Brutus Jackendy.

[@intelligencequest]

Great stuff, this is one of my favorite things about live demo's! Classy move putting the whole thing up instead of editing to make your troubleshooting process look more seamless

[@KeithBarker]

Awesome, thank you!

[@crystald3346]

You are awesome. Thanks for this!

[@KeithBarker]

You're very welcome!

[@thedoubleop]

Thank you for this Keith.

[@KeithBarker]

Happy to do it, thanks for the feedback Will Bailey.

[@taurusgemini4792]

Excellent, I learned a lot as usual. thanks

[@KeithBarker]

Glad it was helpful!

[@demetriorosario8134]

Hi Keith, good afternoon hope you are doing great.. I just started doing the lab you did yesterday and I noticed that when you were naming router 2 , you name it hostname R3, I do not know if that could has cost the troubleshooting of yesterday, I am a newbie at this. thank you so very much for being such a great example in how you want to help people.

[@KeithBarker]

Awesome! Thank you Demetrio. Glad you are here.

[@leniotsiou]

Hi Keith! Thank you for your videos, you're by far the best at explaining key CCNA concepts on KZbin. Your lessons just 'click' in my brain :D . I have a question regarding IPv6 multicast. How does a router know to listen to a specific multicast? For example, the ff02::2 multicast calls out to all ipv6 routers. Does a router know to listen out and respond to ff02::2 when we enable the 'ipv6 enable' command, or does it go deeper than that? Thank you in advance.

[@zakariaina6323]

your the best, keep going thanks for sharing your knowledge.

[@KeithBarker]

I appreciate that!

[@nvevesthetic]

i didnt complete my high school i have only my intermediate cert and i will complete my ccna and ccnp to change my life to better and also i love IT sooo much wish me luck

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you Networkvev, you've got this.

[@berndeckenfels]

You should mention that the transit Interface sources are also used for ICMP, so clients can see those addresses and they better allow them

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you Bernd Eckenfels!

[@nandishn90]

I'm ur new subscriber I'm from India Nice stuff man I'm working on CCNA & ccnp

[@KeithBarker]

Thanks and welcome

[@asrorkarimov3229]

U are my teacher

[@thefbeeye1519]

Hey Keith I think hdlc is not a cisco proprietary protocol but the way they implement it adds to the existing standard. Not trying to nitpick great vids

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you. I believe you are correct.

[@leothalion3983]

Thank you!

[@KeithBarker]

You're welcome!

[@mirzanoshin2367]

Hey Jeremy I'm not an expert but need your little help. I want a static ipv6 for my home.? Can u help me in that?

[@ericabreu9382]

Why no one talks about the multicast MAC address? I had to search several sites to understand how the NDP works at layer 2. Everything sounds great at layer 3, but a normal switch will only forward frames, what is it supposed to do with an IPv6 packet destined to a solicited node multicast IPv6 address?

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you for the question @ericabreu9382. From ChatGPT: No, a Layer 2 switch does not learn IPv6 solicited-node multicast addresses in the same way it learns unicast MAC addresses. Layer 2 switches primarily focus on learning MAC addresses to forward Ethernet frames within a network. They maintain a MAC address table based on source MAC addresses of incoming frames, associating each MAC address with a specific switch port. IPv6 solicited-node multicast addresses are used by the Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP) for tasks like address resolution and duplicate address detection. These multicast addresses map to a group of devices that share the same lower 24 bits of their IPv6 addresses. Layer 2 switches forward multicast traffic based on destination MAC addresses, but they do not specifically learn or store these IPv6 multicast addresses in their MAC address tables. Instead, they rely on other mechanisms, such as IGMP snooping (for IPv4) or MLD snooping (for IPv6), to handle multicast traffic more efficiently if these features are enabled. In summary, a Layer 2 switch does not learn IPv6 solicited-node multicast addresses as part of its standard MAC address learning process.

[@lekulahowangahaora8733]

how can I improve my knowledge on networking

[@alessandrobonifacio1209]

hi Keith! i m studying for CCNA at the moment and i'm a fan!! if you are looking for ideas.....any chance you could make an updated lab on anycast?? i know there s an old one but would be great to make the full lab....please...

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you Alessandro Bonifacio for the suggestion. Currently I am focusing most of my KZbin content at the Cisco CCNA level, but will keep your suggestion in the queue as a possibility in the future. Thanks again for the idea.

[@christophersardella7191]

In the routing table, it shows a local route with the word "receive". The route I noticed it on was: L 2001:DB8:6783:2::2/128 [0/0] via GigabitEthernet0/0, receive What's receive? Thanks!

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you for the question Christopher Sardella. I did some searching, and based on the following, it is related to CEF, Cisco Express Forwarding: "R1#show ipv6 cef 2001:db8::1/128 2001:DB8::1/128 receive for Ethernet0/0 Because the local host routes are in the routing table, these local host routes also exist in the CEF table. Since these IP addresses are configured on this router (they are local), these CEF entries are receive entries. Therefore, when the router sees packets with a destination IP address that matches these CEF entries, the packets are punted in order to be processed by the router itself." In short, looks like CEF thing, for the router to use internally.

[@christophersardella7191]

Keith Barker Thanks Keith!

[@statusindia8119]

Hey..i got a problem.im not able to add ipv6address im my packet tracer...can u tell me?

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you for the question. Are you running version 7.3 or higher? Are you configuring a router or multilayer switch with the IPv6 address?

[@statusindia8119]

@@KeithBarker i conf router ... Not L3...

[@randallsmith5631]

thx

[@KeithBarker]

Happy to do it, thanks for the feedback Randall Smith.

[@zoltron30]

Whew I labbed this in packet tracer and it was a doozey

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you zoltron30 for working on that lab! Hands on practice is one of the best ways to build your skills, and get better. Thank you!

[@berndeckenfels]

Hm.. that should cover prefix advertisement, if people start with static prefix they will have a hard time to migrate to other isp prefix

[@ARONKARLTV]

Please do some ACL

[@KeithBarker]

That is definitely in my queue. Stay tuned, and thanks for the suggestion.

[@ARONKARLTV]

@@KeithBarker You're Welcome :)

[@ux7188]

give the man a like 2k views less than 100 likes 2 hours + of content for free !!

[@KeithBarker]

Thank you Giovanni!