Is AI our next nuclear threat? With Joshua Steinman and Nathan Labenz

[@HouseOfGreyy]

More oppositional debates like this! This was one of my favorites from your channel. 🙌

[@eriknelson7752]

Bring back Dan and Antonio. The trio was magical.

[@Glen000]

Amazing contrast between the practical and the ideological

[@theimproooooooover]

Great point, Nathan is very isolated from reality or chooses not to live in it

[@spartan5536]

This was a waste of Joshua's time.

[@davidkey4272]

Lost me at “single issue voter” on not having an international AI arms race. That’s a sentiment that belongs in a college farming commune, not a serious conversation about how geopolitical actors actually behave.

[@thesqueezyteam]

Nathan discredited and made a fool of himself in the episode with Samuel Hammond; why bring him back?

[@and1play5]

yea he needs to stick to the ai dommer podcast

[@MomentofZenPodcast]

Nathan is brilliant and first principled and willing to have hard conversations, and we want diverse views on this podcast. I thought the Sam debate was strong too. - Erik.

[@hungrybadgerr]

@@MomentofZenPodcast I feel that his mentality makes him a phenomenal founder/entrepreneur but a terrible geopolitical negotiator. Still an informative conversation and one that I was glad to listen to.

[@matthewmallan1995]

Very difficult to get the ideological to appreciate the 'is real'. Focus, (the near complete lack of it) is an infuriating aspect of talking to those who 'believe'. Great conversation thanks.😊

[@lbrtyworks]

how’s it feel to be earth’s #1 podcast and only get 300 views

[@xenon5458]

BEST INTERVIEW so far. Loved it. I appreciated the passionate (but ultimately respectful) dissent as well.

[@and1play5]

Get Nathan off Moment of Zen, please.

[@spartan5536]

This podcast episode is a perfect example of why DC people don't listen to the proles

[@darktorrent_]

8 minutes in, this Nathan guy is just not very smart AT ALL. definitely not the quality of person required for such serious topics

[@dailydoseofnews4828]

These two are not so far from eachother. Nathan didnt seem marrried to the idea to let China get newer chips. Good that ppl care about this issue

[@theimproooooooover]

Josh is an Alpha Male, great conversation all around thank you Nathan, Josh and Erik!

[@theimproooooooover]

Lmao'ng at Josh saying fans of appeasement/disarmament may not be the most ethically truthful participants 😉

[@stevemahoney708]

I'm not a fan of Harris but Joshua here tends to exaggerate many things, which is understandable given his personal investments in defense companies.

[@and1play5]

nathan a CCP shill lmfao yeoooo

[@mitsuman5555]

Nathan you’re one of the most effective communicators on the subject of AI I’ve found, it really bothers me to see you wasting your time on purely political conversations. You’re better than this.

[@hectorjelly]

Josh is just an embarrassing fan girl

[@hectorjelly]

He is more convincing on China tho

[@apolo2177]

fan girl of reality? or what are you talking about exactly? if you're not worried about the CCPs motives you must live under a rock or