Is Christianity False if Judaism is False?

[@irodjetson]

We need more videos like this, people must stop linking modern Judaism with Biblical Judaism.

[@Hereticalable]

Absolutely - people need to stop linking the biblical Israel the modern state too. Indeed - I think many Jews themselves have no real link to ancient Israel.

[@irodjetson]

@@Hereticalable true

[@sigurdholbarki8268]

I understand you, but I think you go too far. The secular world, and many Christians, see Christianity as a daughter of post Temple Judaism whereas there are more like sisters and both are daughters of Temple Judaism. Now I happen to think that they are wrong about Christ, but I am far more concerned about the mutual threats we both face, namely radical Islam and Secularism.

[@KatzeMiauen]

Surprise surprise!! Remember the Canaanites? Well... we call them "jews" now, partially, since they do have 50% jewish blood but the other half is really Canaanite

[@KatzeMiauen]

And don't forget Apocalipsis 3:9!!!

[@JordanBrown-km5kf]

They like to gloss over that Judaism today is a newer religion that came about hundreds of years after Christianity. It isnt old testament Judaism.

[@HunnysPlaylists]

Yes! 700 years after!

[@harrygarris6921]

I don’t think they’re glossing over it they’re just speaking out of ignorance

[@harrygarris6921]

@@HunnysPlaylists rabbinic Judaism didn’t suddenly pop into being in 700 ad. It began to drift away from Christianity in the first century and that drift has continued for 2 millennia

[@carsonianthegreat4672]

@@harrygarris6921Rabbinic Judaism has its origins around the year 400. It reached its zenith in the 700s

[@harrygarris6921]

@@carsonianthegreat4672 it has its origins in the New Testament when a large portion of the Pharisees rejected Jesus Christ as the Messiah. Maybe what you’re referring to is the compilation of the Talmud as the start of rabbinic Judaism? Because yeah the Talmud was produced during the time period you’re referring to. But the Talmud didn’t fall out of the sky it was produced by Jewish rabbis within a community of people who were practicing a form of Judaism that rejected Jesus Christ.

[@tflics]

This is a very controversial topic--though it shouldn't be. The Judaism of the old testament (the old "covenant") has finished. Christ, the LOGOS, replaced it with a new covenant, but those who did not want to give up the old covenant now openly and actively reject LOGOS. EMJ, anyone?

[@eg4848]

Who cares? Every non christian religion "rejects the Logos" from your pov and are hellbound so why sperg out and hyper focus on Jews? Durr EMJ have you even read his book half of it is about non jews

[@manuelbraga406]

Well said. E.Michael Jones is the only man who is not afraid to tell the truth.

[@mehmeh217]

@@manuelbraga406 As great as EMJ is, he is simply repeating what is in the New Testament! It’s all there!

[@michaelhotard1557]

Agreed. Though a better way to put it is to say, “Jesus Christ is the completion of the Old Covenant.” The Epistle to the Hebrews addresses the consequences for those who are would desire to return to (or remain in) the Old Covenant.

[@exerciserelax8719]

I think this has to be worded carefully. Not sure if you are a Catholic (assume most viewers of this channel are), but the Church has rejected supersessionism, the idea that the Christian (Catholic) Church completely replaces Jews as God's chosen people. The children of Abraham are still God's chosen people. As Paul says, we (Gentiles) are grafted into the tree--we're not the main tree, which remains alive, waiting for the natural branches to also be grafted back in. Thus God's promises still apply to the people of Abraham. This is not to deny that they will be saved by being brought to Christ.

[@damnedmadman]

Paradoxically, for me another very convincing fact is that the majority of the Jewish people have... rejected Christ - which fulfills the prophecy in Isaiah 53.

[@damnedmadman]

@@union8200 Yes, because eventually the Church will contain only the saved ones. How many? Perhaps 33%, as in Zechariah 13:8... In the meantime, both the righteous and wicked can belong to the Church.

[@tringalidangelo690]

Isiah 53 is ripped out of context and not a messianic prophecy.

[@damnedmadman]

@@tringalidangelo690 Nope.

[@tringalidangelo690]

@@damnedmadman Yes it is. Numbers 23:19 clearly and swiftly contradicts the trinity. But you believe G-d changed his mind, that instead of his promise in Jeremiah 31 that all men would due for their own sins he would make himself an innocent man to die for us. Even though he said, "An innocent man cannot die for the sins of the wicked". The nations prophesied that the suffering of the Lord's servants, the Jews, would lead to our repentance. Please see Let's get Biblical Isiah 53.

[@damnedmadman]

@@tringalidangelo690 Jews cannot be the "suffering servant" from Isaiah 53, because they are anything but silent and innocent servants. And BTW there's no ancient Judaism since 70 AD. The only valid continuation of ancient Israel is the ancient Catholic Church.

[@BensWorkshop]

Milo (not the name on his birth certificate) was born and raised Catholic, abused by a priest, became rampantly gay and then seems to have drawn back to that and reverted back to being a Catholic. Also he did say he had some Jewish heritage.

[@fij715]

He is also a advocate for pedophilia

[@Ghalion666]

I dont think he ever stopped being catholic, he was just an openly gay cathoic until about 2017 or 2018 of so

[@LarryXLR]

The amount of prophesy in the Old Testament that came true, especially in the time of Jesus Christ, is insane. Historically confirmed prophesy.

[@damianwhite504]

There is not a single prophecy in the old testament that has come true. Zero.

[@inquisitor1984]

@@damianwhite504 Here is one: Jeremiah 25:11-12 "This whole country will become a desolate wasteland, and these nations will serve the king of Babylon seventy years. But when the seventy years are fulfilled, I will punish the king of Babylon and his nation, the land of the Babylonians, for their guilt," declares the Lord, "and will make it desolate forever" With the fall of Harran in 609 BC to the Medo-Babylonian conquest, the Assyrian empire ceased to exist as a state. The Battle of Carchemish was fought around 605 BC between the armies of Egypt allied with the remnants of the army of the former Assyrian Empire against the armies of Babylonia, allied with the Medes, and Scythians. This was while Nebuchadnezzar II was commander-in-chief and Nabopolassar was still king of Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar became king a few weeks after this battle. The Neo-Babylonian Empire was conquered by the Achaemenid Persian Empire in 539 BC, marking the collapse of the Chaldean dynasty less than a century after its founding.

[@collectiveconsciousness5314]

@@damianwhite504Deuteronomy 28 and Daniel 9, for starters.

[@mattmackmack9173]

There is also the wealth of Second Temple literature, that rabbinic Judaism does not recognize and intentionally ignores because of the messianic themes that were so prevalent before and during the time of Jesus..

[@martinciglenecki526]

I think a conversation with EMJ is in order. Logos is rising indeed.

[@williamjohnson3093]

I would watch that

[@exerciserelax8719]

What's EMJ?

[@jayguevara6153]

@@exerciserelax8719 Dr E Michael Jones. He's an author who talks a lot about Jews and isn't highly regarded by the SPLC or ADL.

[@williamjohnson3093]

@@exerciserelax8719 E Michael Jones

[@PaulDo22]

EMJ is the last guy with whom to have a discussion.

[@JaceyMitchell]

Christianity is the final evolution of Second Temple Judaism. Rabbanic Judaism is younger than Christianity. Judaism by itself isn't false, as technically speaking Christianity IS Judaism in its final, completed form. It is rabbinic Judaism that is false. Rabbinic Judaism is the evolution of the Pharisees.

[@carsonianthegreat4672]

Yep! Catholics hold to the faith of Abraham, not Rabbinicists

[@marvalice3455]

Rabbinic Judaism is not second temple Judaism. If we are being as generous as possible, rabbinic Judaism is a reaction to the destruction of the temple in 70ad, which makes it still younger than Christianity. But if we are going to be honest with ourselves, it owes far more to the middle ages than it does to the time right after the fall of Jerusalem.

[@jimnewl]

God explicitly gave the Jewish people kings and priests to lead them. He never granted such authority to the rabbis.

[@oldtimmy9481]

No Christianity is not technically Judaism. Spouting heresy

[@ksanto9797]

Martin Goodman's book "Rome and Jerusalem" is an excellent read and (unintentionally) supports that current rabbinic Judaism is a new religion created after the destruction of Temple, not a continuation of the old.

[@brianmaes5418]

Thanks!

[@batboy49]

I converted to Catholicism at 20, it wasn't until about 25 years later that I realized due to the teaching of Father Wolfe that Modern Judaism is NEWER than Christianity in fact it is a reaction to it. Biblical Judaism WAS true, modern Judaism IS NOT. I am gratified to see how many of my Catholic brethren know this.

[@marvalice3455]

For a long time, many in the church were under the false belief that if we just flatter the Jews enough we could save their souls. Unfortunately what we really need to do to save the Jews, is evangelize them and the rest of the gentiles. Them because we need to give each individual a chance, the rest of the gentiles because st Paul says the fullness of the gentiles will be brought in before the Jews as a whole are.

[@oldtimmy9481]

Early Father of the Church called it the Old Law or Hebrew Religion or Abraham Laws. Judaism was always a sec that broke off after the destruction of the Temple

[@andymalone7338]

It is also important to note that Rabbinic/Talmudic Judaism only dates from the 6th Century A.D.

[@zGoldie]

Thats not true. The Talmud was compiled in the 6th century but contains writings and debates going back to the 2nd century, the Mishnah in particular.

[@andymalone7338]

@@zGoldie Odd, how you conflate a compilation of earlier written works and commentary in the Talmud with the practice of Judaism of antiquity. Temple Judaism died in 70 AD and nothing replaced it. It is a culture of victimhood not a religion.

[@rebelteacher]

I believe Milo's a lifelong Catholic. He has been straightforward about not living in accordance with the faith while still claiming to believe it.

[@christianRafaelCasti]

I was in a telegram group with him when he stopped living with the man he was with and went cold turkey, his convictions had caught up with him and he finally started to walk the walk, and not just talk the talk

[@billxciii]

Milo's ethnically Jewish though his mother, but he was raised Catholic.

[@sethn1094]

​​@@billxciiiAny clue what strand? Orthodox? Or just culturally jewish?

[@feliciab5019]

@@sethn1094ethnically. Neither religious nor culture since he was raised Catholic. Like the commenter above you said. :)

[@Tartersauce101]

He's a grifter who believes in nothing, per his own words.

[@knightrider585]

Saints Luke and Paul were both scholars and well educated, just saying.

[@carsonianthegreat4672]

And St. John was a priest of the temple

[@GraceAbrhamsGa1970]

Hello I was recently at the costco in calgary and noticed they only had halal options for their whole chicken , chicken full wing and chicken legs. It was their Kirkland brand. I was extremely disappointed as I do like Costco. When supermarkets start having halal only choices you will find that the rendering factories where the chickens are slaughtered will have a predominantly muslim and then shortly thereafter an exclusively muslim workforce. Note also that money spent on halal products does end up supporting islamic causes and in certain cases the subjugation of Christians. Please boycott halal food. Anything with the halal symbol. This incudes the Nandos sauce and walmart brand chips. In the country I originated from halal has become the only option for chicken & beef. Please do not let that happen in Canada.

[@peaceturtleinfinity]

I really like your videos. You have a nice calming presence.

[@feliciab5019]

Just so y’all know, the Talmud is a book containing conversations/sayings of Rabbis. They give their two cents regarding scripture(usually) and other things. These rabbis even contradict each other. :)

[@racheljames7]

And thr talmud is full of disgusting evil things. Look up what it says about where Jesus is now and what's happening to Him there. And it calls Our Lady terrible, slanderous things.

[@KatzeMiauen]

Babylonian talmud is somehow worse

[@KatzeMiauen]

@@racheljames7 I'm surprised your comment is still up, keep sharing the truth about these evil sect which calls itself judaism, real judaism is no more it evolved into Christianity

[@nethrelm]

Yes, it's more like a bunch of commentaries than akin to Scripture. And yes, some of those commentaries are horrible and blasphemous, but others are interesting and insightful. It's unfair to practitioners of modern Judaism to say that they follow the Talmud. For starters, no one can "follow the Talmud" because, as you said, there are numerous contradictory commentaries in it. It's more of a guide to understand, from the perspective of various rabbis, how the Law came to be and how to understand and follow it in a post-Temple world. Add to that the fact that there are numerous different sects of modern Judaism: Haredi (ultra-Orthodox), Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, etc., that hold various views on what is and isn't authoritative in the Talmud. To accuse every Jewish person of believing the blasphemies of the Talmud is a bit like assuming that every Protestant denies the real presence of the Lord in the Eucharist simply because _some_ do. People are complicated and you should always inquire about a person's individual beliefs and try to avoid gross generalizations.

[@ThunderBoob]

You glow

[@MattKyleBullerthemattkylefiles]

I have never explored this thought experiment. Amazing content Brian

[@baraka92]

I call it proto-protestantism.

[@carsonianthegreat4672]

@@user-yv4fp4do8mit’s not that unfounded when you look up the reason why the Protestants denied the inspiration of the Deuterocanon and their views on sacrifice ecclesiology

[@mehmeh217]

This video was GREAT! Thank you so much for this.

[@levibarros149]

You did a much better job answering this than Trent Horn and Jimmy Akin ever have. Thank you for the clarifications

[@SJohnson529]

Both are normies. I really appreciate both, but Trent said as much. They will both align themselves with the mainstream as much as faithful Catholics can it seems. That means avoiding controversial subjects like the Jewish question.

[@minorityvoice9253]

It's because they have a modernist tendency on this issue because of VIIs Nostra Aetate document.

[@StIstvanKingofHungary]

Thank you for making this Brian. Perfectly nuanced and I think it drives the message home in a very appropriate and tactful way. I’m glad to see more mainstream people talking about this.

[@andycopeland7051]

Thank you so much for discussing this in such detail. Id been pondering this question for a very long time

[@booshkaboo]

"Barba tenus sapientes" Latin quote, which means "Wise as far as his beard"

[@lilheven1238]

Really good video man.

[@Ch_3Ta]

Please can you make a video about doubts and how to handle it in a world full of so many voices and confusion?

[@jaqian]

Thanks

[@khatack]

Judaism IS false though. Judaism rejects Christ Jesus, hence it is false.

[@bumponalog5001]

Modern Judaism. The old covenant Jews did not have to except Christ because he had not been made incarnate yet so they had no knowledge of him. But once He died for us and the new covenant was established Judaism ceased to exist. Modern Judaism isn’t actually Judaism.

[@khatack]

@@bumponalog5001 A good distinction, but I think you do it the wrong way round. It is the modern Judaism that is called Judaism, I don't think ancient Israelites called their faith that. In fact, I'm not even sure the religion had a name back then.

[@marvalice3455]

​@@bumponalog5001 no, they had to accept him in as much as they could do so given their circumstances. They don't get a free pass.

[@Nate.777]

Great video, this is a crucial topic that many are ignorant of, and many in the church seem to skirt around for some reason

[@XSilvenX]

Incredible recap.

[@Dr.MariaKatsamanis]

Always amazing content

[@christophersnaith6987]

This is a good treatment of the topic. Great job, Brian. The only thing I would add is a little more historical information. After the Babylonian Exile (which ended around 538 BC), the Jews returned to the lands of Judah, but they had been populated by various Canaanite tribes. During their time in Babylon, and after their return to the lands of Judah, many Jews took non-Jewish wives. Ezra records many reforms enacted at this time, including a call to put away these non-Jewish wives and to return to the pure religion of their ancestors. Many did and many did not. In the wake of this period, you had the rise of several different Jewish sects, including the famous ones we know about from Scripture: the Sadducees and the Pharisees. The false sects could not be purged from Jewish society mainly because the Jews didn't have total control of their lands. First, the remained under the Persian Empire, who allowed them to return to Judah and establish a governorship there. After this, they were conquered by the Alexandrian Empire, and became Hellenized--and it was during this period that the Jewish Scriptures were translated into Greek as the Septuagint. Then, they were subsequently conquered by the Roman Empire, and lived under this rule up until the arrival of the Messiah. The religion of the Hebrews was never meant to be sectarian, in the same way that the Christian Church was never meant to be. That many sects arose under the influence of the Persian, Greek, and Roman empires implies to us that these sects were not merely disagreements of emphasis in OT readings, but very widely divergent beliefs. The Sadducees, for example, did not believe in the resurrection of the dead. Additionally, there was an Edomite group (emphasis on that they were ethnically non-Jewish), the Idumeans, who were forcibly converted to Judaism and integrated into Jewish society during the Hasmonean dynasty in the second century BC. These also had an influence on Jewish society and religion in the lead up to, and in the wake of the arrival of the Messiah. This is distinct from the Samaritans, who were another ethnically non-Jewish group who practiced Judaism, but who lived as a separate and distinct society, and who didn't really influence Jewish society and religion. All of this to say that the religious situation of the people of Judea at the time of Christ was complex and not uniform. The religious group that emerged in the wake of the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, though widely understood to be prominently of the Pharisaical sect, represents more of an admixture of various competing sects who became unified in the face of Roman persecution. In addition to the adoption of the Talmud, which is a hermeneutic system for interpreting the OT books, Rabbinic Judaism also threw out several books which were included as canonical in the Septuagint: the Deuterocanonical books. This means that Rabbinical Jews possess a different canon of Scripture, and a divergent Scriptural hermeneutic than their predecessors.

[@TheRealShrike]

Apparently Brian H. thinks only Christianity is allowed to evolve. Very good points that Judaism was not a monolith in ancient Palestine.

[@billrupert7560]

Brian Holdsworth talking about the Talmud? Yep, that's based

[@JaneBowe]

Excellent podcast...thank you!

[@jessehermann7266]

Great stuff man

[@danielchavolla5421]

I didn't know about Talmudic Judaism. Can you give us some examples of clashes between the Talmud and Old Testament Judaism?

[@JohnFromAccounting]

Arguing about which family deserved the authority to give the teaching on a specific matter. The family that won the dispute said they were favoured by God because they had legitimate family succession, however the family that lost complied with orthodox teaching. Essentially, they cared more about the bureaucracy and the ceremony of who had power than getting their own religion right.

[@PatriciaMcGloin-f8y]

Thank you so much. that was so interesting.

[@joksal9108]

Fascinating. I didn’t know any of that. Well, of course I knew the Temple had been destroyed in 70 AD, but I didn’t know why people argue that modern Judaism has lost much of its continuity with OT practices/beliefs.

[@Migueleby]

Christ is King. ✝️

[@issapcarb6246]

Very informative thanks!

[@loganw1232]

Depends on if it’s Jewish traditions or beliefs before or after the Messiah?

[@ledzeppelinfan1970]

Anyone know the name of the painting at 3:24?

[@lynb.3040]

Flevit super illam, 1892. Enrique Simonet Lombardo. Museo Nacional del Prado

[@ledzeppelinfan1970]

@@lynb.3040thank you!

[@CatETru]

Great Job Brian. More brave Catholics on this platform please. Let's stop playing dodgeball!

[@mementomori1483]

Howd those disputations end? And why? And what of the zohar and kabbalah? Few more things for interested parties to learn about and compare what you find to Christianity.

[@oodo2908]

Ive been looking into Kabbalah the past few days. It explains the different names of God, like El, Elohim, Tzaboath, Adonai, etc. There is a lot we are missing in singular translation to God, only. As well as it explains things like why Job has 3 daughters and 7 sons. Lots of stuff we are missing. I wouldnt say its important to the faith. But its important if you are interested in cosmology, structure, and mathematics.

[@Joker22593]

​@@oodo2908 Kabbalah is just Jewish Gnosticism, so it's a double heresy. I wouldn't trust it.

[@mementomori1483]

@@oodo2908 yea its good to learn about the underpinnings of satanism and masonry. gotta know your enemy somewhat

[@hamie7624]

Look up Sanhedrin 54b in the talmud.

[@Ch_3Ta]

That was helpful and good video

[@jperez7893]

do eastern catholics have to recognize all the ecumenical councils and the catechism of the catholic church?

[@bearful8035]

yes, otherwise they are not in communion

[@physiocrat7143]

​@@bearful8035 Do the have the same Creed?

[@danieljoyce6199]

​@@physiocrat7143yes they have the same Creed. The Latin Church has a local adaptation of the same Creed which inserts the word "Filioque"

[@physiocrat7143]

@@danieljoyce6199 So fundamentally different conceptions of the Trinity exist within the same communion. Hmm.

[@Joker22593]

​@@physiocrat7143 They aren't fundamentally different. Check out the decisions of the Council of Florence.

[@BenBen-k9d]

I see alot og people talking here about old testement judaism or second temple wra judaism. Can anyone explain what you believe the difference between this and rabbinic judiasm are?

[@VACatholic]

Rabbinic Judaism attempts to trace its roots back to the Pharisees who crucified Christ. They were not part of the Temple sacrifices (that was the Sadducees), but they had great moral authority as they tended to be closer to the scriptures than the Sadducees. As a result, Rabbinic Judaism has no concept of sacrifices, and does not follow the law of Moses. They are a completely novel religion made after the destruction of the second temple (and thus the genealogies which would indicate who is a Levite and thus eligible to be a priest). They have furthermore been coopted by false messiahs like Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank, and have turned into a group of people bringing debauchery to the world in order to bring the return of God (their words, not mine). This is in contrast to second Temple Judaism (an anachronistic term, as the law of Moses applied to all 12 tribes of Israel, not just Judah), which had a priesthood and regular sacrifices. As the people had broken their covenant with God multiple times (not the least of which by crucifying Christ, the Messiah), God destroyed the Temple and the entire direct lineage, and engrafted in the whole human race. As God is the God of all Humans, not just one tribe.

[@KittSpiken]

How could they even be conflated? That's like saying 2+2=\=5 therefore 2+2=\=4 Or the light isn't on therefore the light isn't off.

[@pacifistidentitarian549]

The Temple was destroyed the law was fulfilled in Christ

[@Heath580]

Post-70AD "Judaism" is not biblical Old Testament Judaism

[@ChristopherWilliams-v1h]

So as a catholic do you approve the new popes inclusions and the Sunday now his climate Sunday...

[@anti_missionary_mission]

Interesting that 2000 years without a temple is considered long, yet this was prophesied (Hosea3:4-5) how was this even missed? 2000 years waiting for a second coming, that was supposed to happen "in this generation" is not even considered. Matthew 24:34 Daniel the prophet who lived in a time without sacrifices, what was his advice to the king? See Daniel 4:24 (or 27 in some translations) Why do you assume tribe identity is lost with the fall of Jerusalem…?

[@Nerfherder-oo7iv]

Judaism isn’t false. It just came to an end after Jesus Christ died for our sins.

[@keymaker2112]

The problem is in how we define Judaism. If by Judaism we mean the Faith of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Samuel, etc, then no, Judaism isn't false, it's clearly true. I would argue that it did not in fact end, but continues today in the Catholic Church in an unbroken continuity going back to the the Patriarchs. However, if we mean the claims and practices of the sect of Jews who rejected, and continue to reject, Christ, as opposed to those who accepted the fulfillment, perfection and telos of the Faith of Abraham, et al, then yes, this thing called Judaism is a false religion as it refuses to come to it's logical conclusion in Christ.

[@elKarlo]

It’s like a cicada shell. It was a real thing but it isn’t now. Especially given how it hasn’t had a prophet for 2000 years a snd the 2nd temple was destroyed and there’s no way to have a genealogy so no messiah

[@VACatholic]

​@@keymaker2112saying Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were "Jewish" is completely anachronistic."jewish" comes from "Judah". Since these great men were the ancestors of "Judah" it would be crazy to call them "Jewish".

[@NoChicanery]

It’s false in the sense any religion that’s not Catholic is false. Catholicism is the true Christian faith; one, holy, Catholic and apostolic. It is the only true faith for salvation.

[@keymaker2112]

@@VACatholic I agree, but we use the term so loosely in colloquial conversation that I'm just covering all my bases for the sake of clarity for those who may not have heard these ideas before.

[@bmc8871]

Did Christ preach his ministry to Jews or gentiles?

[@feliciab5019]

Both. Jews first, Gentiles later. :)

[@bmc8871]

@@feliciab5019 In which gentile city did he enter?

[@everetunknown5890]

​@@bmc8871Jesus preached mostly in Judea and Galilee which was mostly Jewish but had gentile people as well. One of them was the Roman governor Pontius Pilate who gave the order to crucify Jesus. It was really after Jesus rose from the dead and ascended into heaven that the disciples began to preach to other nations, especially Paul. If you read the entire book of Acts you'll see

[@bmc8871]

@@everetunknown5890 Yes, I've read Acts. And the Gospels. Pilate did not want to crucify Jesus. He did so because the Jews insisted on it and he feared their power. The disciples "blessed all nations in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit" because Christ commanded them to do so.

[@batzzz2044]

​@@feliciab5019They were Israelites or hebrews. A Jew is from the tribe of Judah. Jesus was of the Tribe of Judah, there were other tribes.

[@Rolando_Cueva]

Without Yeshua, the Tanakh is incomplete. SOLI DEO GLORIA. AVE CHRISTVS REX!!!

[@shinmalestat9272]

Is it not the church that has to be denied but the Holy Spirit? If the church was lead by the Spirit then the church was only a vessel for the Spirit to act through at that time.

[@shinmalestat9272]

In nowhere in the video did the said clip be shown, not allowing us to know the exact context of Milo's claim. I dont know if this video is a response to that claim based on the context or just an apologetic provoked by the brood idea. Down vote.

[@lloydbraun6026]

Milo was raised Catholic and returned to his faith eight or so years ago

[@Tartersauce101]

He lives with his gay black boyfriend.

[@fij715]

He is openly advocating for pedophilia.

[@GusDeavel]

No, hes ex gay. Look it up.​@Tartersauce101

[@HunnysPlaylists]

@@Tartersauce101 Not for maybe 8 years.

[@PaulDo22]

​@@Tartersauce101Incorrect. You are a liar.

[@obl7vi0n]

Brian always got the drip

[@asitallfallsdown5914]

"A natural successor to ancient Judaism" = Temple Worship, priesthood, covenants. = Mountain Jews (Mormons / Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints). Minus animal sacrifice for personal sacrifice, though animal sacrifices will be restored in the future, or at least one final one would be done.

[@GusDeavel]

No, Christ is the last sacrifice once and for all. No more animal sacrifice. We worship in spirit and truth.

[@Ms.HGL.]

Oh my 🤦‍♀️

[@DavGre]

Protestant: I'm for the Early Church and the Bible. Not that Catholic Church that came later... Everyone else: but the bible as it's organized wasn't from the Early Church...

[@ventusborealis2414]

Christians don't usually understand the Holy Scriptures Jesus quoted and many times interpret the Word of God wrong way. The Christian pastors don't know the context and that jewish life that early followers of Yeshua lived. Many doesn't know how after Jesus death and resurrexion early believers lived like any other jewish people worshipping Hashem at the temple of Jerusalem meaning jewish ritual baths etc, they kept all jewish feasts so on. That last 40 years until the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem. At that time many rabbinic jewish scholars even honoured "followers of that Way" and Talmudic teachings seam to be chanched later on the middle ages to more polemic way. Jewish calendar and feasts really speak to us about Jesus if we are interested in them. Old jewish customs are not things without purpose, but important things leading to Jesus Christ - Yeshua haMashiach, later rituals like kabbalism etc naturally are not.

[@sniperpronerfmods9811]

I am back like I never left oh ya!

[@hglundahl]

5:55 However, they are not the _only_ physical continuation of the back then Jewish nation. Guess what Palestinians are? They are Jewish and Samarian ethnics of Christian or Muslim confession. Christian Palestinians are THE oldest version of Konversos or Jews for Jesus. Muslim Palestinians are ONE OF the oldest versions of Dönmes, or Jews for Muhammed.

[@carsonianthegreat4672]

@@hglundahl most Palestinian Muslims are Arabs

[@SanctusPaulus1962]

The vast majority of palestinians are ethnically Arab, not Jewish.

[@n02p]

Recent convert? I thought he had an experience with a priest when he was younger. It would be better to say he's come back to the faith.

[@Know_The_Truth1]

I think even though it started one way it's ending much differently. I would say that one religion accepts the fact and the other does not, ultimately you cannot say those collective people have done necessarily good things for other people in fact a lot of what they're doing is hurting people. God in his infinite mercy is Jewish and became Jewish to fulfill the prophecy, this is actually one of the conversations that I would like to have with God. I would say the people you know of the past are not the same of these people of the present these are two distinct different ideologies that form a collective identity. If you want proof read revelation | apocalypse you will find it in chapter 3.

[@Simonm-jc]

I feel as though Jesus' ressurection affirm(ed) Judaism. He fulfilled Jewish prophecy after all

[@KyleTheDalek]

So why no peace ?

[@theoldsaxon6484]

It didn't "affirm Judaism;" it fulfilled the law and prophets.

[@KyleTheDalek]

@@theoldsaxon6484 What’s the difference between?

[@Simonm-jc]

@@theoldsaxon6484 I'm not sure I see a difference. God made a temporary covenant with Abraham and his descendents - that covenant was Judaism. Jesus came, bringing in the new covenant, which is the Gospel of Christianity.

[@theoldsaxon6484]

@@Simonm-jc Precisely. "The old has passed away; behold, the new has come." Brian is not saying there is no connection between Judaism and Christianity. He is stating essentially what you are. He posits a distinction between the ancient Judaism of the time before Christ and the current Rabbinical or Talmudic form.

[@pleb1717]

Depends on how they Disprove it. Modern Judaism no. Maybe Old Testament Judaism before Jesus. I have yet to see an argument disproving it though.

[@TheRoark]

Protestant here regarding the jab against us around 2:00. Protestants do not deny the necessity of the church for passing along the scriptures, but we do deny that she possesses in herself infallible authority. The church of course can pass along the words of God, which are infallible, without having the same authority as the holy spirit that inspired them. Like a child who writes down a message from her mother to give to her teacher, the child is necessary for transmission but is not causitive of the note, nor does she possess the same authority that the mother has. Hope this provides some clarity!

[@Tartersauce101]

"Oh thanks for having the authority and wisdom to create our perfect book, now we will go start our own church(es) because you aren't authoritative" 🙄

[@catholicguy1073]

Yes the infallible church somehow determined what constitutes god-breathed Scripture. 🤦 Completely illogical and not historical. Revisionist history.

[@rnhmbover63]

Its clear that this argument is much worse than I previously thought. Thank you.

[@TheRoark]

@@rnhmbover63 what’s wrong with my analogy?

[@Johnthestudent]

What’s wrong with Roark’s analogy is that his “child “ chooses which notes from his mother are infallible. There is no way for Protestants to explain the authority of the NT without a church which carries Jesus’ authority. In accepting the 27 books of the NT Protestants implicitly accept the authority of the Catholic Church.

[@JasonPaulMusic]

Nothing is technically wrong with this explanation, but it’s the typically wrong framing a convert-seeking religion would impose on a system that is not concerned with conversion. When you grasp this you realize it’s apples and oranges. Rabbinic Judaism is not concerned with the things Christianity is at the deeper theological levels. That’s the place to start. The purpose of these two systems are different. Christianity is for saving the world for eternity. Rabbinic Judaism exists to save the Jewish corporal people (successfully I might add) for the Eschaton.

[@bmc8871]

Rabbinic Judaism is concerned with a temporal (worldly) kingdom. They killed Christ because he would not deliver on their political desires. It is not concerned with gentiles converting Judaism but it is concerned with gentiles submitting to the seven Noahide laws, which include international Jewish courts.

[@sigurdholbarki8268]

​@@bmc8871you sound like you're in danger of thinking like a collectivist

[@sigurdholbarki8268]

​@@bmc8871rabbinic Judaism did nothing of the kind because it did not exist at the time of the Crucifixion, and this sounds dangerously close to a collectivist framing which is a post enlightenment concept and properly belongs in the Religion of Secularism

[@bmc8871]

@@sigurdholbarki8268 Yes, the Jews did kill Christ and yes you are obligated to submit to their Noahide laws according to their religion. “Collectivist” thinking has nothing to with it.

[@theoldsaxon6484]

@@sigurdholbarki8268 The idea of collectivism is a modern invention, just like the idea of the individual. What you describe as "collectivism" would have been quite common both prior to the Enlightenment, and is just as common nowadays.

[@HaleStorm49]

We need to quit saying true/false. They are less true and more true. Less correct / more correct. Christ came to them and gave them a higher law and a new covenant. The more righteous the people the higher the law God can give them.

[@abrahamphilip6439]

Neither is Christanity or Torah Judiasm false but for a sure their Talmud is false & deeply flawed that Jesus called the Doctrines of men , Is there one thing that man gets correctly ?

[@oldtimmy9481]

No, Judaism is false. Rejection of the Messiah and killed his people.

[@poetmaggie1]

Without the guidance of the Spirit, Jewish lost its place to Catholicism which the Spirit lifted up as a fulfillment to the Jewish Covenant.

[@oldtimmy9481]

Trent Horn Screeching in Pain as he strikes you

[@chuggajr]

Claiming the Church gave us the Bible is simply false. The Church didn’t exist for the entirety of the Old Testament’s writing, and the majority of the books in the New Testament are first-hand accounts from founders of the Church BEFORE its formation. The information in the Bible is the foundation of the church, just because they gathered it all and put it in one easy to access book doesn’t mean they invented it.

[@BrianHoldsworth]

The Bible is a library or which the Old Testament is a section, so the fact that it pre-exists the Church doesn't invalidate the claim. Secondly this is a factually false statement which does invalidate your claim: "the majority of the books in the New Testament are first-hand accounts from founders of the Church BEFORE its formation." The Church was formed on the day of Pentecost. What books of the NT precede Pentecost? The answer is 0.

[@batzzz2044]

Ummm so aren't they Israelites or Hebrews? There are 12 tribes, one is the tribe of Judah. Jews are strictly from 1 of 12 tribes.

[@happybeejv]

Nah man, just be a marcionist, Well marcion's canon was just luke*, romans, Galatians Philippians, Philemon, 1&2 Corinthians Thessalonians, Ephesians* and Colossians You can use the whole new testament, In its current form, in whatever language you read It now references non canonical texts I mean Besides 1st enoch, Or you can replace the old testament with better books, How about the tao te ching? Or ra the law of one? Or the works of plotinus? Or plato? Or proto indo european reconstructed mythology? How about starwars, the matrix, and the big Lebowski? How about the declaration of Independence, Constitution and bill of rights Of the united states? How about a redacted version of the old testament missing the parts that modern archeology, historicity, western moral philosophers, and itself disagree with

[@Guy-d2e]

In the first century two new religions emerged from the Israelite religion. One was Christianity the other was RABBINIC Judaism. Each had a path to salvation and each honored the Old Testament but each had a NEW Testament. In the case of the Jews was the Talmud. The Talmud is a collection of the traditions of men condemned by Jesus. In short Judaism is FALSE. By the time I finished typing this I realized the Brian was supporting what I wrote.

[@chrissi3193]

Good teaching , but I find it easier to see what Jesus says in Johns Gospel He says salvation is of the Jews( Jn 4.22). But He is the Way, Truth and Life for we the Gentiles. Jn 14.6). The Jews would find it easier to accept him as Saviour because He will be a more decent judge of them than Moses will be( Jn 5.45). Who was and is their judge if they dont accept Jesus as Lord. So it seems to me anyway. Paul tells us to work out our own salvation( Phil 2.12) instead of denying Jews their primacy as Gods original people.

[@anthonyzav3769]

But Jesus IS Yahweh Lord of Hebrew Armies (no need to use the King James lingo ‘Hosts’) who fought strategically and tactically on the side of the Hebrew Armies in the Book of Samuel, Judges and Joshua.

[@HunnysPlaylists]

Well no, because modern j is just a reaction to The Church (which is near indistinguishable from Biblical J).

[@markcreemore5879]

Tovia Singer blew up the claims of Christianity so thoroughly that anyone familiar with his case can never return to it.

[@PaulDo22]

Tovia who? I can't take anyone seriously who thinks some random guy has refuted Jesus Christ. Tovia must be a fraud.

[@markcreemore5879]

@@PaulDo22 Check him out. It might open your eyes to the contradictions and absurdities of Christianity. He’s far from being an atheist. He’s actually an Orthodox Jew, and a very pious one. Which means that I have some issues with his beliefs, too, as that lot can be fundamentalist like Trad Catholics and evangelicals. My own beliefs tend towards Hinduism and Buddhism.

[@markcreemore5879]

@@PaulDo22 Where is your “saviour”? He disappeared for 2000 years, even though the New Testament said he was going to return soon. Jebus is CLEARLY not the Messiah.

[@PaulDo22]

​@@markcreemore5879Unless you have anyone Who is the Son of God in your belief system, I'm out.

[@markcreemore5879]

@@PaulDo22 It’s simply PREPOSTEROUS to suggest God has a “son”. This is sheer idolatry. What can that even MEAN?

[@NatanKohen-b3k]

"... lf you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples..." this is Christianity. Otherwise, is just wishfulthinking, lip service!

[@cynthiaberry2019]

No.

[@MystoRobot]

Imo, today's "Judaism" is false in the sense that it is *NO LONGER* the same religion they practiced back in the days before the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.. They no longer have a temple for sacrifices, therefore cannot even practice their faith anymore. Whatever came later was the product of the priests and pharisees who rejected the Messiah. My guess is that they had to come-up with something different to save face... a bit like the protestants who lost the priesthood in their schism, now having to save face by inventing "faith alone" and "bible alone", coming up with an entirely new religion solely because they disagreed with God's reality. The Pharisees rejected the Messiah and created a new religion while still claiming to rely on scripture. The Protestants rejected His Church and created a new religion while still claiming to rely on scripture. Both groups will not be saved by the means of their "new religions". They both have to return to the Messiah/Christ in order to be saved. Catholicism (The Church) is a continuation of ACTUAL Judaism, updated by Christ in 33 A.D., therefore is not subject to any "false" religions that came up later-on.

[@knightrider585]

Rabbinical Jewish teaching on King David's adultery with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband Uriah is quite different from the Christian view of this powerful story of sin and repentance. For Rabbinical Judaism, David did nothing wrong; Bathsheba was technically divorced while her husband was at war and Uriah deserved death for disobeying the King's order to go sleep with his wife. If you doubt this, go look it up.

[@SomeSortofSomething]

AMEN!!!

[@bloedblarre]

Ding ding ding, Poseidon is real

[@jamesms4]

This Video is heresy. Milo does not ken what he is talking about.

[@jdkjdjdj227]

Amazing

[@newbee2262]

Judaism isn't false. It's the origins. Christianity is the sequel to Judaism But many Jewish people reject the sequel and is loyal to the original Islam is a spinoff that claim that the spinoff is more authentic that the original and the sequel.

[@thatguy2521]

Not really. Judaism didn’t exist prior to Christianity. Notice how the old testament never mentioned Judaism. Prior to Christians were just Israelites or God’s people. They weren’t called anything else. Judaism was made as a rejection of Christianity.

[@christianstephens7213]

It would be better to say rabbinical Judaism is false . True Judaism comes from God which Catholicism is the constinuation of .

[@VACatholic]

"Judaism" is an anachronism anyway, and as such has a more modern meaning than anything.

[@sucksatcod]

Yes once you stipulate that today's "Judaism" is talmudic/rabbinic Judaism which is false and evil. The 2nd temple Judaism of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, all the prophets has been fulfilled by the Lord Jesus Christ and has now established the new and ETERNAL covenant in Christ and his Holy Catholic and church 🙌✝️🇻🇦🙏

[@DisapprovingFather]

Lol wut? The Patriarchs lived over 1000 years before the first temple was ever built by Solomon....and none of them were Jews.I thought you catholics are supposed to be good on history 😂😂😂

[@sethfriedman6745]

The “Judaism” in the Bible is more accurate to be described as a whole other religion separate from Judaism. See it would be better to call it “The religion of the Hebrews” or “Hebrew(ism)”. Judaism didn’t begin until the 2nd century and it is more commonly referred as “Rabbinical Judaism” and the main crux of their religion is the section of Jesus Christ as the messiah. That is ENTIRELY different from the religion of the Hebrews before Christ which was all about the coming Christ. Then when Christ came and died from our sins then rose from the dead and ascended to heaven, it was then where the religion of the Hebrews became Christianity. Christ fulfilled the old covenant and found a new covenant and created the Catholic Church. Hebrews became Christians, those that rejected Christ became Jews. It’s really that simple once your follow history on a timelines 😂

[@catholicguy1073]

Judaism is true. It’s the only other faith where one can say it is true. And while it is true, Judaism lacks the fullness of Gods Word. When a Jew becomes a Christian it is not a conversion but rather an acceptance for the entirety of the Word of God. There Bible like there faith IS true.

[@hamsterforever7670]

If nowadays Judaism is true, then Christianity is false. You can't have both. The rabbinic talmudic Judaism (present jews) is very strictly anti Christian. It appeared a few hundred years after Christ as an Jewish response to Christianity and its absolute rejection. Have you ever tried reading the talmud?? Because they follow first of all the talmud and their rabbis, not OT. Have a go, read it. You'll understand.

[@BronxCat]

Alot altered

[@ShinAkuma204]

Can the Church wield infallible authority? Yes, of course. Is the church an infallible authority? No, it's not. These are different things. As for Judaism being a false religion and invalidating Christianity? No, Judaism was always false. Christianity was always the true religion. God always knew his plan. Christianity isn't an extension of Judaism, Judaism is a denial of the true religion, Christianity without Christ.

[@markpugner9716]

How do you explain "Judaism was always false" in the context of Israel being God's chosen people?

[@ShinAkuma204]

@@markpugner9716 None have seen the Father except the Son. The religion was always Christianity even when they didn't know it. Judaism is the religion that spawned when God revealed himself in the flesh, Jesus Christ. Judaism is a rejection of Christ aka the God worshipped in the OT.

[@markpugner9716]

@@ShinAkuma204 Wait. "Judaism is the religion that spawned when God revealed himself in the flesh, Jesus Christ."?! Soooooooo what were the chosen people of God doing that wasn't Judaism?

[@ShinAkuma204]

@@markpugner9716 Rejecting Christ? Judaism is Christianity without Christ. The true religion of the Father was always Christianity. John 1 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

[@markpugner9716]

@@ShinAkuma204 So… am I understanding right that you're saying the Jews are and have always been rejecting the Son and thus rejecting the Father?

[@Proclivitytolife]

While having just started the video a few seconds ago, the answer depends on what is meant by "Judaism".

[@hamsterforever7670]

And that's why he explains it here