Is Frightfur Daredevil worth playing? IT'S DEBATABLE!!

[@drearydoll6305]

Seems it was too hard to give him a S/T edition of kraken effect.

[@WillRennar]

Card's a bit of a toss-up. I'd probably tech one just in case the 3000 ATK becomes relevant.

[@blakeowens5996]

yeahhhh but if you summon tiger and sabertooth, which is not hard with all the support we've gotten, all your frightfur's will be 3000+. I've gotten a field of three sabertooths and one tiger, every monster got an extra 2400 attack lol. This is not what fluffals needed.

[@kyuubibomb4467]

Dark Law is at 2400 atk and its a problem for the deck since it disrupts, Sabres' and Sheep's revival effect. Only problem is its counterpart Kraken has removal for anything you can't get over.

[@blakeowens5996]

kraken or tiger can kill it

[@calebwhittier9793]

Im adding this in. I just wish it was a little better after all the hype.

[@2Kaleb]

Meanwhile I just want a Koa'ki Meiru XYZ to be made.

[@moussetehdoggoeswoof5896]

Meanwhile; I just want those the new dinosaur deck that has seemed to have ceased to exist.

[@IgorMartinsSpecail]

"those the new" "has seemed to have ceased to exist"

[@chigaorro9799]

i just want a Digital Bug spell card

[@gamerofknowledgeandmore426]

2Kaleb same actually being a koa'ki meiru player

[@danalloway7002]

love this channel so much

[@Ikiryo1]

I'd just use 1, just in case, I'm losing

[@mushythezombehkiller]

1:28, It doesn't specify that it has to be other Frightfurs, so you'd burn them for 1500 including Daredevil itself, doesn't overshadow the fact that this thing is mediocre, but yeah, just felt like clarifying that. Good video still.

[@SasakiKiyotaka]

A copy of one seems alright, I kinda see it a bit like cowboy in a way where that burn "MIGHT" kill, it's also a nice 3k beat stick that can go up if you summon sabertooth or tiger, who knows, maybe you can't just sweep away a threat like Ultimate falcon or something.

[@EL3TRICKRAZY]

Yo! When's the next "bad deck" profile? Its been a minute!

[@TheNutshaq]

If using kaijus counts as opponents card effect, then you can use it. If not then idk

[@mrmampmamp]

Where is the“it's debatable" clip from?

[@moussetehdoggoeswoof5896]

mrmampmamp Darude-sandstorm

[@orangitotheman30]

i would add it just in case i need a 3000 atk monster

[@PhotonKingShark77]

Well I'm playing it anyway.

[@dbzloverxl]

Your deck became hella consistent, Sora.

[@Anhnoles]

ill probably just add one for the hell of it.

[@johnwhittington2998]

I'd probably go into this late game if I don't have the materials

[@xhostzohxghost871]

I summoned frightfur tiger using 9 cards and a frightfur fusion all at once.

[@romkin1197]

To be honest, since its materials are generic it is pretty good with that alone with a 3k body. But hey more OTKs right?

[@bradleypierre1098]

have you here about dueling nexus it in alpha right now

[@UlisseAyulePkmnYGO]

heard*

[@MaximusD3RP]

HERE COMES THE POWER CREEP "when this card leaves the field" here comes the new generation of boss monsters that are literally impossible to get rid of

[@sgplaysit8727]

ARGUABLY: Daredevil is a worse/better barbaroid. 1000 less attack (and I believe 1800 less defense) burns for 1000 but does not negate effects and can't attack twice, but is EASIER to summon.

[@johnwhittington2998]

It could be good in a Cowboy for game kinda way

[@tehcharliebonanza]

The only reason to play this card would be for the high base attack. But fusing into Tiger then Sabre Tooth is still better putting Sabre Tooth at 3400 ATK. Well why not go Devil and Sabre Tooth? Because Devil in that situation would still only have...*drum roll* 3400 ATK. So you're accomplishing the same thing in terms of attack points but you gave up destroying multiple cards on the field for inflicting some burn damage from destroying a monster in battle that probably wouldn't have been there in the first place had you just gone Tiger!

[@christopherbennett5858]

I wonder.... is it a deterrent for Kaiju's?

[@AcroxShadow]

I guess it could be good if your opponent is using cards that negate battle damage

[@IgorMartinsSpecail]

or if it had some protection, like can't be targeted...

[@harciongaming9122]

If you go off properly, this guy has over 4k, and a 4k beatstick is nothing to sneeze at. If nothing else, he's the easiest beatstick fluffal to get out, so since a lot of them have low atk before Sabre and Tiger do boosting, this is somewhat necessary as a card in some matchups, just to get over a problem.

[@chandelurechan2638]

Play one just to get over big boss monsters that can only be killed by battle

[@blakeowens5996]

Summon tiger, then make a sabertooth from tiger. Gets you a 3200 and 3400 beater.

[@slenderxkiller6800]

why do fusion monsters always get the ass treatment in terms of effect

[@StarlightSG]

I'd say yeah. Leave the backrow and pendulums (lmao) to Tiger, let this guy go in for the beatdown and burn.

[@corbinisms8846]

Idk. Maybe side 1? It's pretty big, but ... meh.

[@Tools-yt4sk]

Its literally as bad as transcendental polymerization in fluffals Not good enough

[@LuigiaTV]

I didn't see that card being useful in fluffals tbh, its 2000 lp for potential double fusion tat can be done more easily with fluffal card effs. I guess I can see with the whole it can't be prevented but 2000 is a waste and not worth filling up the deck when something more useful exists.

[@Tools-yt4sk]

Thats why i said as BAD as transcendental polymerziation. Its just a bad card in fluffals and is only steeling the place for other cards

[@LuigiaTV]

+Levin Tooley Yes I know, I was questioning more why anyone would consider it in the first place.

[@Tools-yt4sk]

+LuigiaTV if you look at capg's video about the card they all were like: "its such a good card...its playable in more decks than predaplants and wind wichtes..." they meant this card is good in fluffals

[@LuigiaTV]

Levin Tooley Meh Cap also thinks Fluffals r going tier 1 but lets be honest while they have good cards coming out they still can't really compete with the top tier meta.

[@r4ureviews]

Easy 3000 beatstick. Will be putting 1 in the extra deck as it is the *easiest* way in fluffals to get 3k attack.

[@ericthemadscientist8357]

It burned me for 4000 to dead once when I play with my friend

[@hung-yiyuan5146]

the only thing is it's a easy level8 material

[@HellKaiseROficial]

play 1 its ok just if you "need him" to burn your opp and win

[@joshuatorres7766]

What you expect? It's a manga ca...wait wasn't the vision hero a manga card and it's good?

[@funnyclown1234]

if it said burn for everythng fluffal and frightfur it would have been slightly better. as is the card is pretty bad. it the worst frightfur card, i would even play bear over this

[@moussetehdoggoeswoof5896]

Toaster But would you play Leo?

[@VicRTH]

Not of all, but one copy it's enough.

[@brianbrandan9736]

i will play only one

[@puchimausu]

use devil as cowboy...EZ

[@Aiden-zi3xf]

it's not bad just not good enough.

[@TTigrex]

another reason for me to run frightfur sanctuary in my deck.... //cough cough ewwwwwwww

[@danielstradingcardmarket5572]

Leel

[@judgementcut420]

fashizzle

[@bradleymiranda1873]

Dinerooooooo

[@nujabesrip5416]

This monster is so bad. It don't deserve to be play like chimera.