Is Hinduism The Truth?

[@amitpratap7551]

12,000 years old, 100+ Detailed, Sacred books, numerous Prophets, avatars, thousands of scholars, accommodates at least 16 philosophies of life... Dude, Hinduism is what was everyone's religion in the world before "only me and mine" cults started forming in the world.

[@michaelz123x6]

And hardly any temples before 1AD.

[@ishansharma5001]

​@@michaelz123x6 In Nepal 26,500 old lord shiva idol is found..so don't comment without knowing anything fully.

[@michaelz123x6]

@@ishansharma5001 Don't claim 26 thousand years,260 thousand years or 2.5 million years.How do you date it? Find me a temple more than two thousand years in India.It's so difficult right?

[@ishansharma5001]

@@michaelz123x6 Tere na maane se sachai toh nahi badal jayegi... Vikram samvat is older than Jesus Christ birth. Aisa koi church bata jo 5000 saal purana ho,,,🧐😏 Okay

[@michaelz123x6]

@@ishansharma5001 Don't assume I can understand what you are saying.I'm not from India.To have this discussion one does not have be from or living there right? So in English, what is your argument or evidence for anything more than 2 500 years?

[@sharmilakalain7549]

Hinduism doesn't seek to be true, it seeks the truth. And for those adopting its teachings, they will find the truth.

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

The Truth: *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With this rain, Indra throws drops on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 1.103.3* “With His thunderbolt, He destroyed the cities of the Dasyus, and strengthened the Ārya.” *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, slayer of Vṛitra, destroyer of cities, scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Indra, destroyer of cities, the slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, Lord of the sky."

[@be572]

so accurate.

[@klasgroup]

You have put it well, it seems the truth.

[@tatalu1942]

@@casper-z9rkls6gl Please read fully Vedas and Upanishats and understand them by getting teachings from learned people. The above samle quotations do not reflect or mean the the real an actual Sanatana Dharma

[@abhishekghosh4384]

​@@casper-z9rkls6glyou obviously have no knowledge of Sanskrit and are just copy pasting things.

[@warpdrive9229]

Bro learnt Hinduism from the Bible 💀

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

From the Vedas: *Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with his yellow beard and yellow hair" *Rig Veda 1.103.3* “With His thunderbolt, He destroyed the cities of the Dasyus, strengthening the Ārya.” *Rig Veda. 2.20.6* "Indra, slayer of Vritra, scattered the Dasyus sprang from a b______ womb." *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra owns the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Indra, destroyer of cities, slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, Lord of the sky." *Rig Veda 9.41.1* "Bright, they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the b____ skin far away."

[@jesusistheonlytrueGod7]

Your religion is satan worship

[@SouvenTudu1]

Yes

[@lordbaldwin4493]

@@casper-z9rkls6gl fake refrences this are dedicated to the asuras and danavas . first learn sanskrit without knowing sanskrit its useless to learn hinduism

[@VSM101]

True the guys said poor uneducated people can't attain liberation lmao even the prayers examples of saints and stories in our traditions say this is false.

[@nielpaul5205]

The Varna system is very commonly misunderstood in the west, As it does not preach that your class or Varna is based in your birth rather it is based on your karma(here meaning "choise of profession or work") For example:- Son of the priest (Brahmin) can be a kshatriya if he chooses to be in the Militia or he can be a vaishya if he starts a trade or business. But this Varna system later divolves into "caste system" which forbids mobility of classes based on karma(work) and bases on janma(birth).

[@universalphilosophy8081]

The Varna system was cast to as caste system by the west as they were perplexed in contrast to their whites (masters) and blacks (slaves) racism. They found a white skinned Shudra and a black skinned Brahmin in India and were confused thoroughly😂😂😂

[@kailashchandraprusti3223]

Ask hhim about witch hunting

[@SadanandaSadananda-rm3jp]

​@@universalphilosophy8081I am black Brahmin, am i a shudra according to you?

[@universalphilosophy8081]

@@SadanandaSadananda-rm3jp It has perplexed the Abrahamic religions who wanted to write Indian history. The Abrahamic religions sanction white masters and black slaves. The whites were entitled to use the black slaves as well as their black women. Read the Bible or Quran. Inorder to still show that they were more humanitarian than Indian Hindus, they brought in caste paradigm. Whereas actually it was Varna according to occupation that was prevalent in india. Caste became the easiest placard to convert people to their Abrahamic religions The fact is that Indian systems were clear that humanity has to grow in the merit of intelligence and nothing else. The other Varnas were designed to protect progress (गो - प्रगति) and scientific pursuit (Brahmana).

[@SadanandaSadananda-rm3jp]

@@universalphilosophy8081 l agree, colour has nothing to do with cast system. But Aryan theory supporter's believe in colour based varna system. This is laughable, but still so many bheemtas believes this

[@nsprphg]

Soul is also eternal in Hinduism

[@Methodius-and-Cyril]

Until it achieves Moksha.

[@ramanchaudhary2518]

@@Methodius-and-Cyril eternal

[@Eternal00211]

​@@Methodius-and-Cyrilin moksh it merges with brahman, it doesnt mean it stop to exist.

[@Methodius-and-Cyril]

@@Eternal00211 that only works if you become him.

[@Eternal00211]

@@Methodius-and-Cyril Not Exactly. When you become self realised and understand the true nature of self(atman), then your karma becomes 0 and you break the cycle of birth and rebirth and attain moksha.

[@hariompathak5784]

Short answer- YES IT IS.

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

Longer answer: *Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with his yellow beard and yellow hair" *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper, consumes the malignant, tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra possessed the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda 9.41.1* "Bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the b____ skin far away."

[@GoldenCat-g3n]

​@@casper-z9rkls6glall the reference u have given r lies and misleading Rig Veda 3.34.8 स॒त्रा॒साहं॒ वरे॑ण्यं सहो॒दां स॑स॒वांसं॒ स्व॑र॒पश्च॑ दे॒वीः । स॒सान॒ यः पृ॑थि॒वीं द्यामु॒तेमामिन्द्रं॑ मद॒न्त्यनु॒ धीर॑णासः ॥ सत्रासाहं वरेण्यं सहोदां ससवांसं स्वरपश्च देवीः । ससान यः पृथिवीं द्यामुतेमामिन्द्रं मदन्त्यनु धीरणासः ॥ satrāsāhaṃ vareṇyaṃ sahodāṃ sasavāṃsaṃ svar apaś ca devīḥ | sasāna yaḥ pṛthivīṃ dyām utemām indram madanty anu dhīraṇāsaḥ || English translation: “Devout worshippers propitiate Indra, the victorious, the excellent, the bestower of strength, the enjoyer of heaven and the divine waters, and who was the giver of the earth and heaven and this (firmament to their inhabitants).” Later is this vers Rig Veda 3.34.9 स॒सानात्याँ॑ उ॒त सूर्यं॑ ससा॒नेन्द्र॑: ससान पुरु॒भोज॑सं॒ गाम् । हि॒र॒ण्यय॑मु॒त भोगं॑ ससान ह॒त्वी दस्यू॒न्प्रार्यं॒ वर्ण॑मावत् ॥ ससानात्याँ उत सूर्यं ससानेन्द्रः ससान पुरुभोजसं गाम् । हिरण्ययमुत भोगं ससान हत्वी दस्यून्प्रार्यं वर्णमावत् ॥ sasānātyām̐ uta sūryaṃ sasānendraḥ sasāna purubhojasaṃ gām | hiraṇyayam uta bhogaṃ sasāna hatvī dasyūn prāryaṃ varṇam āvat || English translation: “He gave horses, he gave also the sun, and Indra gave also the many-nourishing cow; he gave golden treasure, and having destroyed the dasyus, he protected the ārya tribe.” So this was about to protect the tribe  Resources Rig Veda 1.130.7 Sanskrit text [Accents, Plain, Transliterated]: भि॒नत्पुरो॑ नव॒तिमि॑न्द्र पू॒रवे॒ दिवो॑दासाय॒ महि॑ दा॒शुषे॑ नृतो॒ वज्रे॑ण दा॒शुषे॑ नृतो । अ॒ति॒थि॒ग्वाय॒ शम्ब॑रं गि॒रेरु॒ग्रो अवा॑भरत् । म॒हो धना॑नि॒ दय॑मान॒ ओज॑सा॒ विश्वा॒ धना॒न्योज॑सा ॥ भिनत्पुरो नवतिमिन्द्र पूरवे दिवोदासाय महि दाशुषे नृतो वज्रेण दाशुषे नृतो । अतिथिग्वाय शम्बरं गिरेरुग्रो अवाभरत् । महो धनानि दयमान ओजसा विश्वा धनान्योजसा ॥ bhinat puro navatim indra pūrave divodāsāya mahi dāśuṣe nṛto vajreṇa dāśuṣe nṛto | atithigvāya śambaraṃ girer ugro avābharat | maho dhanāni dayamāna ojasā viśvā dhanāny ojasā || English translation: “For Pur, the giver of offerings, for the mighty Divodāsa, you, Indra, the dancer (with delight in battle), have destroyed ninety cities; dancer (in battle), you have destroyed them with (your thunderbolt), for (the sake of) the giver of offerings. For (the sake of) Atithigva, the fierce (indra) hurled Śambara from off the mountain bestowing (uon the prince) immense treasure, (acquired) by (his) prowess; all kinds of wealth (acquired) by (his) prowess.” Rig Veda 1.130.8 इन्द्र॑: स॒मत्सु॒ यज॑मान॒मार्यं॒ प्राव॒द्विश्वे॑षु श॒तमू॑तिरा॒जिषु॒ स्व॑र्मीळ्हेष्वा॒जिषु॑ । मन॑वे॒ शास॑दव्र॒तान्त्वचं॑ कृ॒ष्णाम॑रन्धयत् । दक्ष॒न्न विश्वं॑ ततृषा॒णमो॑षति॒ न्य॑र्शसा॒नमो॑षति ॥ इन्द्रः समत्सु यजमानमार्यं प्रावद्विश्वेषु शतमूतिराजिषु स्वर्मीळ्हेष्वाजिषु । मनवे शासदव्रतान्त्वचं कृष्णामरन्धयत् । दक्षन्न विश्वं ततृषाणमोषति न्यर्शसानमोषति ॥ indraḥ samatsu yajamānam āryam prāvad viśveṣu śatamūtir ājiṣu svarmīḻheṣv ājiṣu | manave śāsad avratān tvacaṃ kṛṣṇām arandhayat | dakṣan na viśvaṃ tatṛṣāṇam oṣati ny arśasānam oṣati || English translation: “Indra, the manifold protector (of his worship) battles, defends his Ārya worshipper in all conflicts, in conflicts that confer heaven; he punished for (the benefit of) man the neglecters of religious rites; he tore off the black skin (of the aggressor); as if burning (with flame), he consumes the malignant; he utterly consumes him who delights in cruelty.” Again here indra is protecting So all the reference u have given its incomplete

[@TysonThe1stt]

Arya❤​@@casper-z9rkls6gl

[@abhayraichand1863]

​@@casper-z9rkls6glearth is flat as per Bible and Galileo was killed by Church for saying earth is round and not flat and sun does not revolve around earth but it is the other way round

[@abhayraichand1863]

​@@casper-z9rkls6glpeople like Max muller purposely Misinterpreted Vedic and Sanatan dharm scriptures to convert people

[@Unity108]

As an educated Hindu, I will never watch this video, as the question itself is BS !

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

Yes, read the texts . . . *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "In the rain, Indra throws drops on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus, won the land and sunlight with his white-skinned friends” *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper, tore off the b_______ skin; and delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, slayer of Vṛitra, destroyer of cities, scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra owns the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Indra, destroyer of cities, slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, lord of the sky." - *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They roared, burned riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skinned which Indra hates.”

[@ybey7037]

Agreed, this Video is pure BS. This guy thAgreed the Video is pure BS. This guy thinks he understands a spiritual ancient system based on experience. His religion believes you experience the God in heaven when you die. Which means his religion can never be verified.inks he understands a spiritual ancient system based on experience. His religion believes you experience the God in heaven when you die. Which means his religion can never be verified.

[@ratishmodgil631]

All relegion started from hinduism belive it or not... OM NAMO SHIVAY🚩🚩🚩🚩 🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇧🇻🇧🇻🇧🇻🇧🇻 JAI BHARAT 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

[@BlackColt-y5h]

Lies, all religions come from animism, quite possibly being 100000 years old

[@BlackColt-y5h]

Animism is older than hinduism.

[@ratishmodgil631]

@@BlackColt-y5h really all that came from hinduism bcuz they also have same consept

[@Hfgjdsrgtgbh-kr4yj]

​@@BlackColt-y5hlol 😂😂Nice joke

[@Methodius-and-Cyril]

@@ratishmodgil631 nice joke.

[@ateetyadav2255]

Go to nearest ISKCON centre they answer all your doubts. Belief me Hinduism is so deep that you can't measure its depth with your biblical brain.

[@SavithaMSNair]

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@Vvk11vv1]

​@@casper-z9rkls6gl 1)You have read a very incorrect interpretation of scriptures which nowadays are in plenty(blame the leftist historians) Eg:a) U r talking abt black & white discrimination, Lord Rama was himself saanwala & Lord Krishna was as black as dark clouds. Infact his name literally means black. Lord Shiva has fair complextion but Mata Kali has black complextion. b)"Sakal tadna k adhikari" in sanskrit loterally means "Should be cared properly" but leftists translated it as "should be treated brutally"[Such a blunder] 2)Lot of wrong things were added by Islamic rulers Eg: a)Uttar kand of Ramayan was added in medieval times. It was done to defame Lord Rama and push conversions. Lot of bad things were added in it such as punishing sambhuk, drinking madira etc

[@ateetyadav2255]

That's why vedas are not meant for low class people. They always misinterpret Your teacher must be an English man. We worship Krishna he is too black

[@SavithaMSNair]

@@ateetyadav2255 you said it... 🌹🌹🌹

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

@@Vvk11vv1 Bollywood and Michael Jackson creams are billion dollar industries.

[@MAYURHDHURI]

WE THE PROUD SANAATANI's have a history & counting of 1.2 Billion years of our existence

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

Very true . . . *Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with his yellow beard and yellow hair" *Rig Veda 1.103.3* “With His thunderbolt, He destroyed the cities of the Dasyus, and strengthened the Ārya.” *Rig Veda. 2.20.6* "Indra, slayer of Vritra, scattered the Dasyus sprang from a b______ womb." *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra possessed the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Thou, Indra, art the destroyer of all the cities, the slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, the lord of the sky." - *Rig Veda 9.41.1* "Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the b____ skin far away."

[@jithu__1474]

@@MAYURHDHURI 🕉️❤️

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

The etymology of _Satanism._

[@MAYURHDHURI]

@@casper-z9rkls6gl ????

[@jithu__1474]

@@casper-z9rkls6gl yes but not Sa. tan, We are those who learn not to k. ill even a living bei.ng. They are the one who study the last book😈

[@sureshkumar-cu6ql]

Sanatan dharm is light of universe it eternal, universal, scientific, dynamic, flexible and beautiful

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

YES! *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With this rain, Indra throws drops on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus, won the land and sunlight with his white-skinned friends” *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper, consumes the malignant, tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, slayer of Vṛitra, destroyer of cities, scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra owned the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Indra, the destroyer of cities, slayer of the Dasyus, prosperer of man, the Lord of the sky." - *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They roared in unison, burned riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skinned which Indra hates.”

[@jithu__1474]

@@casper-z9rkls6gl read all scriptures

[@Jaibheemmusalmaan]

​@@casper-z9rkls6gldesyus descriptions are non human like descriptions. Indra destroyed non human like mortals which was unlike jehova did in bible killing children women man infants animals etc in samuel 15 : 3. This is just tip of the iceberg. Hindu philosophy is not murderous as both the abrahamic religions ie islam + christianity.

[@jesusistheonlytrueGod7]

​@@Jaibheemmusalmaandasyus are humans

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

@@Jaibheemmusalmaan Indra was a great warrior, just like Alexander, Richard the Lionheart, Hernando Cortez, Francisco Pizzaro, Robert Clive . . .

[@starxust3827]

I am a Atheist but a proud Hindu

[@ExMuslimAman]

Still you'll be killed since you are still a Kafir 😂😂😂

[@__.cf.__darkn_ess5173]

You can be either one of the above. If you call yourself atheist then u can't be proud be hindu and vice versa.

[@ExMuslimAman]

@@starxust3827 this the state of woke Hindus whip don't even know their religion and neither the atrocities of both other Abrahamic religions. Radical Islam is the snake hiding in the Grass, so called peaceful Islam is the Grass Hiding the Radical Islamic snake 😡😡😡😡

[@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108]

@@__.cf.__darkn_ess5173 Wrong. Hindu is geograhical cultural civilizational indegenious national identity. and Hindus people are free to believe or disbelieve in God. there is no religion. religion is a fraud concept. there are only cultures on the planet which are non-expansionist and are harmony based. religions are expansionist conversionist political culture destroying cults. these cultures talk about love but they don't accept people with their own faith or spiritual systems. religion is hypocrisy.

[@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108]

Wrong. Hindu is geograhical cultural civilizational indegenious national identity. and Hindus people are free to believe or disbelieve in God. there is no religion. religion is a fraud concept. there are only cultures on the planet which are non-expansionist and are harmony based. religions are expansionist conversionist political culture destroying cults. these cultures talk about love but they don't accept people with their own faith or spiritual systems. religion is hypocrisy. I hope youtube doesn't delete my comments again so I will be commenting same reply multiple times.

[@BigBilly2009]

The Western influence on your ideas about Hinduism (more correctly Sanatan Dharma) clearly shows. The caste system is not rigid and is not allocated to you by your birth. The wrong idea was propagated by the British to divide Indian society and continues to do so to date (just like the now-debunked Aryan Invasion Theory). According to the scriptures, your mindset, actions, and profession (Karma) determine your Varna (loosely translated as Caste). So if you are born to a sweeper (shudra) but you spend your time learning and propagating the Vedas and performing Vedic sacrifices (yajnas) then your Varna will change to Brahman from Shudra which would remain if you chose your father's profession (which typically most Indians did in ancient times). There are countless examples in smritis like Mahabharata and Ramayana where a person performed different actions from that of the parents and thus, was able to change their Varna. One of the biggest examples is the Brahmarishi Vishwamitra who was born a kshatriya (warrior class), ruled as a king, but later in life performed severe penance, learned all the Vedas and was anointed a Brahmarishi (Brahmin or priestly class). Please research from actual Hindu texts and scriptures before spreading falsehoods about the Hindu religion.

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

European (Aryan) colonizers imposed Satanism and the varna system on the native population, just like they did in the American South (Segregation), and South Africa (Apartheid).

[@1n1lymk]

For years Western tried manipulated but never understood hinduism

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

From 1933 to 1945, it was the _de facto_ religion of Germany. *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With this rain, Indra throws drops on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with his yellow beard and yellow hair" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus, won the land, sunlight with his white-skinned friends” *Rig Veda 1.103.3* “With His thunderbolt, He destroyed Dasyus cities, and strengthened the Ārya tribe.” *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshipers, consumes the malignant, tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda. 2.20.6* "Indra, slayer of Vritra, scattered the Dasyus sprang from a b______ womb." *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, slayer of Vṛitra, destroyer of cities, scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra owns the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Indra destroyer of cities, slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, Lord of the sky." *Rig Veda 9.41.1* "Active and bright they have come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the b______ skin far away." *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They roared, burned riteless men, blowing away the b______ skinned which Indra hates.”

[@Vvk11vv1]

Good understanding from a western person but not all correct .... 1)The caste system (Birth based discrimination) is not due to Scriptures or Dharma mentioned in Hindu scriptures. It was a social evil born out of greed and class differences . Infact very famous scriptures has pointed out that it was adharma(sin). As per scriptures, Brahmin was not a caste based on birth.. Brahmin literally meant " Any person who has evolved in spirituality". 2)The Aryan invasion theory where indigenous people are shown to be outclasses by relegion itself is just a fabricated story created by lestists to divide people & show marxist class struggle. There are no concrete evidences of that, while there are concrete evidences to suggest otherwise.

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

So you're saying Sanatanism is bs: *Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with his yellow beard and yellow hair" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus, won the land and sunlight with his white-skinned friends” *Rig Veda 1.103.3* “With His thunderbolt, He destroyed the cities of the Dasyus, strengthening the Ārya.” *Rig Veda. 2.20.6* "Indra, slayer of Vritra, scattered the Dasyus sprang from a b______ womb." *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra owns the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Indra, destroyer of cities, slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, Lord of the sky." *Rig Veda 9.41.1* "Bright, they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the b____ skin far away."

[@Vvk11vv1]

@@casper-z9rkls6gl 1)You have read a very incorrect interpretation of scriptures which nowadays are in plenty(blame the leftist historians) Eg:a) U r talking abt black & white discrimination, Lord Rama was himself saanwala & Lord Krishna was as black as dark clouds. Infact his name literally means black. Lord Shiva has fair complextion but Mata Kali has black complextion. b)"Sakal tadna k adhikari" in sanskrit literally means "Should be cared properly" but leftists translated it as "should be treated brutally"[Such a blunder] 2)Lot of wrong things were added by Islamic rulers Eg: a)Uttar kand of Ramayan was added in medieval times. It was done to defame Lord Rama and push conversions. Lot of bad things were added in it such as punishing sambhuk, drinking madira etc

[@infotainmentunlimitedbyrohit]

Absolutely There is no caste Varnas only which are not determined by birth as per our scriptures And Aryan invasion is a biblical propaganda. Sanatan Dharma is based on humanitarian and universalism just like most Dharmic religions.

[@geroldbendix1651]

You generally spoke about the impersonal view of Hinduism, who's most influential proponent was Adi Shankara. If you read the "Vedanta" explanation in Wikipedia you will see that there are also 4 monotheistic schools of worship, called Vaishnavism. The Hindu monotheism tho is different from the abrahmic thought. It's polymorphic monotheism, the different Avatars of Vishnu are all the One personal supreme God, but they appear in different forms according to time, place and circumstances. They also differ from the idea of the ultimate complete oneness. The plurality of existence is an eternal fact as stated in the Bhagavad Gita 15.7 : The embodied souls in this material world are My eternal fragmental parts. But bound by material nature, they are struggling with the six senses including the mind.

[@mayanktomar9562]

Arthur Schopenhauer stated that: “In the whole world there is no study so beneficial and so elevating as that of the Upanishads… It has been the solace of my life; and it will be the solace of my death. They are the product of the highest wisdom.”

[@aruunmenon]

The only thing they have to beat Hinduism with is the caste system, which is a SOCIAL CONSTRUCT rather than an religious one integral to Hinduism. If any of these people actually visited India they would know that all (traditional) people in India, even the Abrahamic variety, have caste systems more or less. It was initially fluid and choice/deed based, but later after civilizational decline fossilized into something rigid, further codified and rendered inescapable by the British and their evil bureaucracy. These critics hold on to the caste system like the last hope they have to hold against Hinduism, because it is all that they have. You can count of them being "mistaken/ignorant" about it for the foreseeable future. How else would you justify a religion that considers all humans as born sinners.

[@clinton.88]

Hinduism is the true religion which is why it was revealed thousand of years before with the freedom to pray how you want and to who you want because god foresee the many individuals with different views and ways of seeing the true god! Jai sanatan dharma

[@Noname-hx5lc]

It is important to keep in mind that Varna is a Social construct rather than a Religious one.

[@vineetjiran5759]

Castism isn’t actually a thing in hinduism it’s rather a practice which came recently , in hinduism we have 4 varna determined by your qualities (guna) and actions (karma). It got distorted somehow over the time and became jati.

[@gypsydownloader]

In Bhagwadgeeta's 4th chapter, Srikrishna says to Arjuna, that Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra group of four varnas, by division विभाग of guna गुण (quality, attribute) and karma कर्म (good deeds or bad deeds) I have created. In this way, even though I am the doer of those creations etc., consider me - the imperishable God - to be the actual non-doer. ॥ 4-13 चातुर्वर्ण्यं मया सृष्टं गुणकर्मविभागशः । तस्य कर्तारमपि मां विद्ध्यकर्तारमव्ययम्‌ ॥ ४-१३ ॥

[@AMERICANGANGSTER-vw2te]

🚩🚩🚩🚩JAI SANATAN DHARM 🚩🚩🚩🚩

[@singularsink]

ur last slide was a great summary of the difference between Hindu Dharma and Abrahamic religions, totally with u there. Seems Hinduism scores win over the Abrahamics on every point. Then how did u conclude Hinduism is not closer to truth than any one of those religions? Unless u inherently believe the true nature of the Abrahamic God is evil🤷

[@DevendraMahendraSingh]

The Council Of Nicaea created Christianity with the aim of mass psychological warfare that turns people into sheeple, to "Divide & Conquer/Rule" and to make it easy to commit slavery, Genocide and Ethnocide, Indentureship (Slavery 2.0), to invade converted lands to loot and plunder, to make converted lands into vassal states, etc. Example: Each Greek citizen was a warrior. A warrior could kill soldiers from sunrise till sunset, so a warrior could be equated to a lion while soldiers could be equated to wolves. An army of wolves cannot defeat a smaller army comprised of lions so it was imperative for the wolves to change the lions into sheep to conquer them. For this reason Christianity was created to give to the intended victims of invasions/attacks to make them more accepting of the invasions and attackers as they both shared something in common which is Christianity. Christianity taught the lions the following: * Love your (Christian) enemies as you love yourself. * Slaves, obey your earthly (Christian) Masters as you obey the lord thy God. * Forgive your (Christian) Oppressors/Invaders. * Pay your tithes (taxes) to your Christian Oppressors/Invaders. * Give unto Caesar (Christian Oppressors/Invaders) what belongs to Caesar, which is tires/taxes/resources from invaded lands gathered with the labour of the invaded peoples. * Do not fight for a place in the earthly kingdom as you will get a heavenly kingdom, meaning you are born to be under the feet, whip and oppression of Christian Invaders. * It is not your place to deliver yourself but you should wait for a Christian Messiah/Saviour who will never come to free you. * If a Christian Invader slaps you on one cheek then give him the other cheek to slap. * If a Christian Invader takes away your coat then you should give him your tunic as well. * ETC. Krishna Neeti (The Teachings Of Krishna) and other aspects of Hinduism was spread to Rome by Roman Traders after visiting India and then amended and adulterated by the Council Of Nicaea to such a great extent to create a new religion called Christianity.

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

*Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With this rain, Indra throws drops on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus, won the land and sunlight with his white-skinned friends” *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper, consumes the malignant, tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, slayer of Vṛitra, destroyer of cities, scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra owned the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Indra, the destroyer of cities, slayer of the Dasyus, prosperer of man, the Lord of the sky." - *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They roared in unison, burned riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skinned which Indra hates.”

[@watersprite333]

Very true, the Bible was man made by the Romans and based upon the Gospel of Paul from Tarsus and his conversion to Christ on the road to Damascus. Sanatan Dharma is so incredibly old, that the timelines continuously change in the modern world, due to new archaeological findings, however, the narrative within this video, literally skims the surface of Hinduism and does not even delve into the Yuga's, or, ancient texts such as the Surya Siddhanta. The Indus civilisation was so advanced previous, the entire globe marvelled at the sheer scale of it's richness and invaders who came across civilised cultures, such as Mahenjo Daro (in Pakistan now post partition), copied the blueprint of the town's layout, as a template of the modern towns we live in today. Then there is also, the astrological implications of the Vedic Lunar calendar and the Dynasties of both the Sun and Lunar kingdoms; the tapestry of this culture is SO intricately woven, that it would a lifetime of research, in order to summarise a faith and culture, such as Sanatan Dharma. The Lord Yeshua was a kundalini Essene Master and had lived in India/Egypt, training with Yogi's and High priests, such as Thoth, hence his advanced mediation siddi's. Unfortunately, there is so much factual information that the West choose to ignore and dismiss about their own religious origins.

[@Jaibheemmusalmaan]

​@@casper-z9rkls6gldesyus descriptions are non human like descriptions. Indra destroyed non human like mortals which was unlike jehova did in bible killing children women man infants animals etc in samuel 15 : 3. This is just tip of the iceberg. Hindu philosophy is not murderous as both the abrahamic religions ie islam + christianity.

[@renjithjohn1747]

Well said.👍

[@dododifwasssup1784]

The flaw in your reasoning here is that, if they were Christians they wouldn't be invading in the first place.

[@Potatoalex538]

Sanatana is a way of life you live with the law of nature scientifically of spiritually .

[@swarnavaghosh908]

You are wrong about adivasis and also varna system what you are referring to as varna system is actually meidieval period caste system where mentiones varna system became rigidified and based on birth rather than profession.

[@just_a_wholesome_panda]

Even though I am not a practising hindu, one thing I absolutely love about Hinduism is that no matter which god you believed in all your life or none really, you can still attain Moksh as per hinduism based on your righteous actions no matter the religion. Absolutely the meaning of love all, hate none. Gotta love the selflessness in it all!❤

[@m20superbazooka49]

I don’t believe in afterlife. Whenever a human being attains consciousness, he is afraid of death, he can’t understand it, he is afraid to accept death, he can’t imagine nothingness. That’s where all the ideas of heaven and hell come from. Do you remember anything before you were born? No. So why is it hard to accept that after death it’s the same. I have done my own seeking rather than believing what my parents taught me, I am smarter than my parents, more educated, seen vile stuff, saw laws of Karma right before my eyes but I am grateful that my religion allows me to question it all, it’s ok to find your own truth. So here’s my understanding, God is -1 and +1 and everything in between he is nothing and everything, he is good and evil and everything in between, he is male and female and everything in between, he is demonic and angelic and everything in between, he is war and peace and everything in between. If you believe Jesus is your god then it’s your truth and there’s nothing wrong with that. God and creation is infinite he is truth and he is false, open your mind only than can you fathom the infinite nature of God. As a whole.

[@ishansharma5001]

Hinduism gives us pious feeling better thinking about karma,,,helps in avoid violence,,non veg like bad things and if you wanted to live peace ✌️ life,,then Hinduism is best ❤❤😊

[@saurabhsurve9247]

Jesus christ was an saint who went by the name saint Isa he attained enlightenment in India went back to the west and spread his teaching called Christianity. After crucification he went back to India when he lived rest of his life. I would recommendwatching the documentary Missing years of jesus.

[@ExMuslimAman]

@@saurabhsurve9247 exactly

[@just_a_wholesome_panda]

wow! Learnt a new thing today! thanks! I never knew this!!

[@Interstellar2123]

Yes sir... Hinduism has ultimate truths about our existence

[@Niles_Gamit]

According to the Bible God created Adam 8000 years ago. Means, Earth and this Universe are 8,000 years old. 😂

[@lalithakumarithota4135]

*6000 years ago 😂

[@tatalu1942]

When you say "I am here", who is that " I ". The Sanatana Dharma answers this question very effecrively and makes you realise GOD. In the Abrahamic religions no answer exists for this question.

[@ashukunj2636]

A good attempt... I appreciate your effort. A very balanced view. Helps me as a Hindu to know how the world perceives us. Please ignore the hate comments. They think any attempt of a foreign entity trying to understand Hinduism is n attempt to misinterpret and convert us. But you have really a fairly well understanding of Dharma. Good job. ❤️☺️

[@KussamKussam]

Everyone will say ours is the real God but only after death one can find out. After all religions are about afterlife.😂

[@bpgrmds]

😂😂

[@ExploringAngel]

Hinduism is the reproduction of merged and collective understanding of self and its relation with nature and then devine.

[@ExMuslimAman]

@@ExploringAngel you are a reproduction Sanatana Dharma was the only truth rest all other religions came up quite later on this earth. Even Jesus came and learnt a lot from India 🇮🇳

[@TheSatanist13]

Yes, Hinduism is very true and I meditate to Hindu deities, just the spiritual, and mental connection between myself and Hinduism in general. It is always a part of my life, forever.

[@gauravrainck]

HINDU RELIGION IS THE ONLY TRUE, MOST APT, MOST ANCIENT BUT ALSO MOST SCIENTIFIC RELIGION EVER.

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

Yes. *Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with his yellow beard and yellow hair" *Rig Veda 1.103.3* “With His thunderbolt, He destroyed the cities of the Dasyus, and strengthened the Ārya.” *Rig Veda. 2.20.6* "Indra, slayer of Vritra, scattered the Dasyus sprang from a b______ womb." *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra possessed the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and protected the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda. 8.87.6* "Thou, Indra, art the destroyer of all the cities, the slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, the lord of the sky." - *Rig Veda 9.41.1* "Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the b____ skin far away."

[@jithu__1474]

@@gauravrainck 🕉️❤️

[@bestvideos35]

Unlike Vedas caste system in manusmriti is made for political, cultural and genetics reasons not part of Hinduism.

[@AdvDhanilKK]

I am proud to be a Hindu🎉❤🔥

[@Kalyantips-tricks]

In sanatan dharma hindu are seeker in other religion they are believer

[@playlisthitmaker9913]

Post about the CIA files plss

[@MrZero123]

Every particular region comes from sanatan...... once upon a time there was only one religion on earth which is sanatan means Hinduism ❤❤❤

[@MrZero123]

Sanatan dharma means Hinduism is the only dharma all over the world.... others are not religion... they are simply created by a single man....or opinion or Idea of living.......but only sanatan dharma which was created by almighty God...❤❤❤❤

[@r1a933]

If you believe in miracle belive in Sri Krishna. Hare Krishna ✨

[@eternaldebugger_thougtpro]

Good analysis, fairly correct on most of the details. Just a few additional points: 1. Your conclusion of whether Hinduism is true or not is based, as you yourself mentioned, on the words of Christ - i.e - a Christian perspective. There is nothing wrong with that. Christianity being an exclusionary religion can thrive only on the falsification of all other beliefs. Hinduism is universal, on the other hand, as you have rightly stated. Bhagavad Gita 9:23 is an expression of this idea. Krishna says: "Even those who worship others they believe to be God but do so with devotion, really only worship Me, but by an indirect method" In other words, Hindus would believe that by worshiping Lord Jesus or Allah, you are still worshiping the same essence, but since your method is indirect, samsara may entrap you yet. 2. There is now an increasing amount of scholarship on reincarnation. Many universities are investing in its research. Abrahamics used to just negate the idea before, which is why very little western scholarship exists on this, but one cannot deny that there have always been reports, even before the ideas of samsara became widely known in the west. One can argue that the West adopted to modern astronomy quite late in the game (well after ancient Greeks, Hindus and Arabs) because of the church actively rejecting all astronomical research that conflicted their understanding of Biblical cosmology, The same may be true of all esoteric concepts that Christianity currently rejects. Moreover, saying that there is no proof of reincarnation and hence I reject it, is problematic. You have no proof of Heaven or Hell or the Devil either. What you choose to believe is a function of culture and tradition, and your own reasoning. 3. Caste System was not meant to be by birth. Krishna mentions it in the Gita himself - castes are by actions and natural predispositions. You may be the son of a factory worker but your natural disposition is that of a scholar, and hence would identify as a different caste than your father. Likewise, the son of a philosopher or poet might go into farming, and choose a different caste for himself. The argument you can make is that this prioritizes scholarship and administration over commerce and labour. That is correct, but quite ubiquitous. Economics is based on this prioritization too. The books have repeatedly stressed that a low caste individual is AS entitled to moksha AS a Brahmin, based on the power of their devotion. The Gita and the Bhagvata Purana have direct confirmations on this. So this birth based distinction is a social corruption that Indians are now actively eradicating through positive discrimination.

[@narindraramanankasaina2545]

Given the way Hindu castes treat Dalits, the answer is a resounding no. You know them by their fruits.

[@abhisheksainani]

Only those who haven't read Vedas say that caste system is rigid. Caste system was a convenient classification system but anyone can change their caste based on their qualifications and deeds. It is not birth based in its original form.

[@l.anantharaman]

11:45 For a Hindu there are many Gurus who have risen from the dead: Adi Shankaracharya for example left his body while his disciples safe guarded it and came back to life after a period of time into that same body. Thiru Moolar left his body to reanimate a dead body of a sheppard. In fact in Yoga philosophy there's a state called Samadhi (highest state of the 8 fold yoga) where the heartbeat stops breathing stops and all forms of life activities stop on the body of the sage entering that state. So the body in that state is as good as dead. There are so many Gurus in Hinduism who have entered such a state and returned back to life. Sri Ramakrishna and Sri Ramana Maharshi are recent examples. You can find documented conversations of medical doctor asserting the lifelessness of the body of Sri Ramakrishna when he entered Samadhi. As for reanimating another dead person, there are also many instances of Hindu Gurus reviving dead people. But for an enquiring Hindu these coming back to life and reviving some dead person is not a convincing evidence to accept a path. So has Hinduism developed a comprehensive set of philosophical reasoning to understand the nature of the self, the nature of God, the nature of the world and the nature of the relationship between them. These philosophies are the main aspects of Hinduism. In the past for a scholar to accept a particular philosophy in Hinduism he has to be defeated in arguments by a higher reasoning of the convincing philosophy. Of course for the lay person who's not interested in sich reasoning Hinduism doesn't force anything on him. For him the practical steps are given to cultivate love for God like repetition of a holy name of God doing loving worship etc. So unlike what you assumed, Hinduism doesn't say that only a brahmin can attain moksha or liberation. Hinduism says anyone practicing the spiritual disciplines can attain moksha. Hinduism says a person can attain moksha without even reading a single religious book. Even Hindu scriptures say that the scriptures are useless for attainment of liberation or moksha. It's the practice which is more important in the eastern religions and not just belief.

[@kidszone7169]

It is not Hinduism, it is Sanatan Or Hindu Dharm. And your religion Is not Christianity, it is churchianity.😊

[@ybey7037]

@kidszone great reply! Churchianity is exactly what it is.

[@Vikramsingh94422]

Is Christianity true or just a fictional story that people believe blindly?🤣🤣🤣

[@gvenkataraman6854]

"Hinduism" is way of life, seeking Truth, to use your faculties and not be a slave to "prescriptions". Find your way and don't end up in a dead end following any number of those "One Way"s.

[@mr.perfect1067]

Wait wait....debate with me.....later don't hide kid😂.....my point is Hinduism and Christianity not different i can prove .

[@PJ-yp3vb]

Even Jesus is ashamed of you, you are beyond redemption

[@rohanidebidin3537]

How do you know for sure he "Jesus" was raised from the dead? And, what does this REALLY mean. The original text described Jesus as "Jesus the Christ"...and we all are given THIS Christ energy. We just have to seek it

[@ssshammi]

Your interpretation is so wrong the occupational separation is being termed as born poor or in cast. Imagine this over many many years your forefathers have only been fighting wars can you expect them to do anything else except fighting, their DNA structure is such that they are made to be warriors and people who are creative for many many millenniums can't get into muscle building because they have utilise all their life in doing that it would be harder for them but not that they can't do it it's just that they can change their dharma so you're preaching is wrong and you've been misdirected. Non-Violence is another thing that the Hindu are taught. And reincarnation is a scientific truth. No other religion have written down scientifically what is beyond earth and the rotation of the planets which was accurate. You eath is flat the church considered it a blasphemy to think earth is round

[@TheSumit22]

Largest data set about indian castes and ethnic groups is held by joshua project. Even govt of india doesn't have that much data. They are tracking whats % of each caste is converted.

[@newbee2262]

Its NOT. Hinduism is just a philosophy. And just like how the British unified india, they are the ones who created the word 'Hinduism'. Its a tribal/regional religion. Just like the rest of the world, it too was polytheistic. Hinduism - a collection of varying and sometimes contradicting philosophies merged into one. The greeks had Socrates to bring them out ignorance. Im sure the indians also did but they ended up worhsipping him too as an idol. Real question is - why are christian nations developed? So developed that even the hindus and the Muslims want to migrate there? They feel safer under the values of the Christian God rather than their own. Think about it ;)

[@villanousrexus9630]

Hilarious. U r a person who does not understand the evolution of europe and america one bit. You say this but then you will complain that the west is falling. WW1 removed monarchy, the govt religion prescribes to. WW2 removed religion in the west. Hitler appropriated Hindu culture and used it as a justification for genocide. You spit on the horrors urs and my ancestors had to witness and live in.

[@RB97531]

It is my understanding that a Brahmin's son need not be a Brahmin. That system was set by the British, where the Smith's son was a Smith. A Brahmin is one who studies, understands it completely and transmits the knowledge. Everyone (brahmin, ksatriya, vysya, shudra) studies, but the one that propagates is the brahmin. You are classified what you do, not by your birth. Ramayana, for example, was by Valmiki - born to a hunter. Also, I am sure the pyramid of hierarchy was also part of a Western creation.

[@aaabbb-ff1sp]

is christianity nonsense?

[@imadekurniawan252]

as Vaishnava we also accept Jesus crist as Bonafede Guru, jessus born among mlecha persons in middle east. His teaching is simple to uplift soul to love God

[@Peace-f5c]

Yes it's.

[@casper-z9rkls6gl]

Thuggees make sense.

[@Jaibheemmusalmaan]

Both the abrahamic religions are

[@absingh4951]

Dharma=universal law. For example, a Lions Dharma is to satisfy its hunger by hunting. A Deers Dharma is satisfy its hunter by eating grass.

[@freddygovender3879]

Please study the history of the Bible and the church. The original version to English.

[@blueradiator]

I stopped believing in bible after learning about its history... it is a committee decided book!! ... how can it be God's voice

[@ExploringAngel]

Its not possible to explaian a religion or cuture only by reading some books or seeing documenties

[@rohanidebidin3537]

There is no such thing as a " NEW AGED" religious or spiritually. We all have been fooled and over time became self-centered. Spiritually is about the collective (group thinking) while religion is about self (selfishness). Nature teaches us in many ways about group thinking (awareness) We are a group of creatures don't think collectively

[@SJking-gk4go]

All religions stemmed from Mesopotamia. 😊

[@SJking-gk4go]

Oldest culture and beliefs are from Mesopotamia. 😅

[@jithu__1474]

@@SJking-gk4go once sanatan dharm was the global religion.😊

[@Jaibheemmusalmaan]

No.

[@rajkotreporter]

In the beginning after creating Humans, God gave us the knowledge in Vedas. This is known as sanatan(eternal) Dharma. These knowledge was passed on by memorising and reciting. About 5000 years ago they were compiled in four books. There were many other scriptures created by enlightened Rishis who contemplated on Vedas by meditation. Some of indian scriptures are historic books for example Ramayana (19,000 years ago) and Mahabharat(5125 years ago). Part of Mahabharata is a Geeta ( discussion between Krishna and Arjuna). Many of Indian scriptures were burnt by invaders (mostly Muslims) and some were stolen and corrupted by invaders(mostly christians). Fundamentally there are three entities in universe. God (parmatma), souls(atma) and nature(prakruti). God uses prakruti to create universe as playing field for souls. In human forms souls must follow Veda during their life time while doing any action (karma). Our karma leads to our sanskara(character) which hides the true quality of the soul in the human body. That is what makes each human different. To obtain any thing we want in life we can obtain by following meditation procedure in Patanjali yogadarshana. Moksha is to remove all sanskara( created due to our karma) covering true qualities of the soul. which leads to one ness with the God(kingdom of God). In this state the soul enjoys the characteristics of God. There is only one God and all the demigods in Purana are the representation of individual characteristics of the God.

[@amitpadgaonkar8830]

This is a BS understanding of Hinduism

[@durzodhon]

I Converted to sanatan from Islam

[@stigblichfeldt4455]

You cant.convert into sanatan, but you can practis sanatan

[@durzodhon]

@@stigblichfeldt4455 okay

[@Jaibheemmusalmaan]

​@@durzodhongood

[@sriramr2437]

Good Attempt bro. No one can explain HInduism perfectly. Get two or more Hindus to explain what Hinduism is and you are likely to get that many different opinions - each of it correct in its own way and in their context. For us Guru is the spiritual master who leads us to salvation and many believe that moksha can be attained only through the grace of a Guru. In that sense what Jesus Christ mentioned is not entirely wrong. He was probably the only Guru in that area around the time and he was just mentioning the above fact that moksha can be attained only by grace of a Guru. Anyways, there are sufficient reference in local folklore that Jesus Christ was in India and Tibet for about 2 decades learning Jainism, Buddhism, Vedas.

[@rajusaha734]

The caste system portion is wrong totally wrong in Mahabharata and Bhagavad Gita mentioned that human's works define his caste not birth . A human can born in brahman but can choose to be khatriya .

[@LearnAndFun773]

The karma = any of your deed Dharma : determines your karma if it is good or bad And caste system is not based on your birth..It drpends on the character you have..according to bhagvat gita..and there is alot of references prove this points.. Gita 4. 13

[@LearnAndFun773]

Check the story of saint Valmiki as an example of gita 4.13

[@cvenkat7766]

Before posting this type of videos , an exhaustive / impartial study of the subject is required . In this case , the person who posted this video has miserably failed in it .

It is close, but Tibetan Buddhism is the real truth.

[@Vibe-Sanatani]

Avashya proud to be hindu

[@sibathelordofAll]

true or not true it doesn't matter. what matters is that you don't force others with your beliefs and with your opinion do what you like, live how you want to live don't force any one with your mindset. and don't try to kill others. because of your fanaticism some people call their faith and beliefs peaceful but do the opposite to their beliefs.

[@shaifunnessa7816]

Why Indian people saying western copy Indian cultures Hindu

[@jithu__1474]

@@shaifunnessa7816 are you pakistani?

[@YoutuYoutu-u8n]

1.Its all bout understanding and accepting god exists everywhere in this universe in everything. 2.God created us just to be loved and understand what is god actually. 3. The way may be different the ultimate goal is to accept there is a power beyond our understanding. ( Just i can relate it to technology in our present world) 4. The topic is so huge it cannot be explained in one book. And yes the content made here is a nice approach but mis understood in few of the topics in its explanation. 5. Santana or Hinduism what so called here do not ask or force you to follow it. Because everyone's way is different. We respect all the religion. 6.Varnas should be explained different because if its a correct then Rakshsaas, Rushis, Even normal people who seek god he blessed all of them.

[@shivajinationsfather457]

Can you remove the picture of Jesus with Lord Krishna. It is insulting to Hinduism.

[@osielserrato6925]

No it’s not 😂😂 Hinduism is about inclusion Christ is just another avatar of Vishnu, they are both the same. Come on brotha you should know this by now.

[@shivajinationsfather457]

@@osielserrato6925 Christ is not the same as Vishnu. People like you put this comparison for conversion of poor people. Christ hide sometimes when soldiers were looking for him. He was beaten and put on cross according to bible. Stupid secular Hindus accept as one of the god but pure Hindus who know about Bible will not accept. I personally feel he never existed.

[@Sai_096]

​@@osielserrato6925 Jesus was no avatar ...lol...infact Jesus taught many nonsense things like he will wash away the sins..but Krishna never said that..Krishna taught everyone to be good and if they do bad deeds only bad karma will follow them and good deeds are redemption and not "believing and worshipping him will take away all sins"

[@drinkinman86]

The problem is that much foundational knowledge was destroyed in India, but due to Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata & Gita, the core knowledge survived. These concepts of Athman (soul) - Paramathman (Supreme Soul) was theorized by Narayana Sect, the older sect from which we got the current Vaishnava Sect, Shaiva Sect, Shakti Sect, Buddh Sect, Jain Sect, Sikh Sect, Abrahamic Sects, etc. Christianity can be considered a sect of Hinduism too, since you are taking many of hindu concepts from Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata & Gita.

[@be572]

This is most respectful and accurate take on hinduism by any chirstian channel without disrespecting US, Most Chirstian channels are very very disrespectful, and the only thing which pops up in my mind being a hindu is, how can someone really be that hateful after being a religious perosn. IN INDIA, DHARMA TEACHES VIRTUE AND NOBILITY AND HUMANISIM, NOT TO LIE OR STEAL OR DO BAD KARMA. Point is people like u come as a balance to the negative hate that we hindus receieve. We are own our thing sort of people, we really love and to stay in our own lane, and there is no such thing as converting someone or preaching some one about conversion into hindusim, because to core hindus are genetically and racially linked groups of societies which only exists in themselves, outsider cannot be converted to hinduism, you have to be born into a sanatani family and posses it to call and identify yourself as hindus. But point is its rare to find someone like u teaching the right and just not abusing us. Another truth about many gods. There are only 33 types of gods in hinduism. Only 33. The british translaters of sanskrit, misinterpreted 33 types to 33 crore ie 33 million. So not our fault. And most other gods are Reincarnation or Avatars of those 33 types. Hanuman is avatar of Shiva, Narsimha avatar of vishnu. Balaji avatar of vishnu. Etc. So its not confusing to us hindus. These avatars were way of those core gods descending and helping humanity in some form or other to establish balance.

[@Kuchursingh]

My advice the christian auther, rather than looking at what your religion teaches and preaches, look into how it was created and how it changed over the years, such as why it stopped believing in reincarnation.

[@From_tehatta]

No disrespect to Christ or anyone but clearly I don't have to agree or disagree to anything you say . So , unless you are brought up in a Hindu household, embraced India's culture and you have understood the vedas and Puranas under a real guru, your opinion doesn't matter to anyone . You can foster whatever conclusion you wish , it won't make any difference . But if you are here just to convert people just so you know, this planet is really old . Thousands of these religions have come and disappeared from the face of this earth. But the truth has always 'sanatan' . Also , if you're targeting Hinduism just for the maximum reach . So, I'm not sure if you have done any research at all .

[@Rama-tanu]

Hinduism is so problematic. Thank you for pointing it out. I’m a Vaisnava, accepting Vishnu/Krsna as the Supreme and I’m glad you’ve seen the problems with Hinduism. The vaisnava tradition is personal and monotheistic and the goal is to get home back to Godhead as an individual and a person to unite with God who is also a person. What you have described is the philosophy of Adi Shankaracarya who came with the idea that we are just spirit souls who will merge into Brahman and lose our individuality. For your information, there’s been enormous opposition to this philosophy since it came out and it’s still going on. But the philosophy of Advaita-vada by Adi Shankaracarya is more or less the Hinduism we know today, everything is one, we are one. He was also the one who said that those who don’t have the brain to grasp the understanding of Brahman from the Vedanta-sutras has to take birth as a brahmana in the next life and proceed from there. In the vaisnava tradition this is absurd. In the vaisnava tradition anyone can understand Brahman by love and devotion to God. Birth is not a hindrance. As you said, most Hindus don’t read the scriptures, they just do what their parents did, and that’s also a problem. They do something for the sake of just doing it, it’s called blind following. Dharma has no good English equivalent. But it means duty/obligation and nature. It also means something upholds it’s existence. The dharma of fire is to give heat and light. It is doing its duty according to its nature. If fire does not give heat and light, you cannot call it fire anymore. Same thing with sugar, if the sweetness is gone from the sugar, sugar does not exist. The actual understanding of the cast system is that everyone of us must do out work according to our nature, according to out god given gifts. Some are natural carpenters, some are natural farmers or bankers, some are natural leaders, some are natural scholars. Your work should be satisfying for your mind. If it’s not, you’ll be frustrated and not satisfied, it may pay the bills but it’s not a good idea in the long run. This whole thing based on birth is a great misunderstanding and it’s creating so much problems. But it’s being followed unfortunately. Can’t write anymore, I wanted to say more things but time is not on my side. That I you for the clip. Have a good one!

[@Rama-tanu]

@சாரதீ-ஶ்ரீனிவாசன் when you say philosophies, what philosophies did I mention more than Advaita-vada taught by Adi Sankaracarya and the path of smartas? None of these philosophies are actually about relationship with God since Bhakti is the only path about relationship, at least relationship based on love. In the Gaudiya sampradaya, moksha is a byproduct of bhakti. Moksha is not something we care much about. The love and devotion is our moksha since we experience the transcendental bliss from it. When I say that vaisnava sampradayas are monotheistic I mean that we place one deity above all others, designating him as God in the full sense of the term. The others cannot be God in the full sense of the term because God by definition means one who is the source of everything else, the cause of all causes. The others are devatas, empowered beings carrying out the affairs of the universe, under the rule of the Supreme. These devatas also recognize who the Supreme is. I’m happy to exchange words with a devotee of Sri Sampradaya, please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Laksmi-Narayana and Sri Ramanujacharya. Please excuse any offense I’ve made in this text.🙏🏼

[@zupergut3015]

​​​​@@Rama-tanu Ask stauch Abrahamic people what monotheism is(all three jk) we are called heathens because we worship multiple gods, if Vaishnav were monotheistic they wouldn't recognize any other god. Most hindu ceremonies still start with invocation of lord Ganesha, even the Vaishnav ones. In Vaishnav Lord Narayana represents Brahman while in Shaivam it's Lord Shiva, but both god still recognize eachother, that's why we have avatars like HariHar/Ayyappa representing the oneness of Both and Same with Goddess Shakti and Shiva's avatar like Ardhnasrishwar representing the the union of the male and female aspects of the divine and equality. In a sense whole Hinduism can be considered Monotheistic, but we aren't really, we don't see god just as one separate being in the sky, every being in this universe has the essence of Brahman our atman, we don't restrict the Supreme reality to our small human parameters of thinking, we have multiple gods, because Brahman appears to their devotees in the form they envision Brahman. It can be a simple stone or a magnificent darshan like Arjuna had.

[@Rama-tanu]

@@zupergut3015 when I say that Vaisnavism is monotheistic, it means that there is no other cause of all causes than Vishnu/Krsna. Vishnu/Krsna is the source of everything: Brahman, devatas, Shiva, Ganesh, dityas, aditiyas, everything. I put Vishnu/Krsna as Gid in the full sense of the term without anyone equal. Sure we have expansions which are non-different from Vishnu/Krsna and equal, but Vishnu/Krsna is still the source of them. Yes God is not just some guy in the sky, limited to his position. But God is the source of Brahman. Not the other way around, that’s adi Sankaracarya’s philosophy. And it’s just atheism. If someone is finding Brahman in a piece of stone or in a bicycle or the neighbors hat then the practitioner must believe that Brahman in the source of everything. That’s monotheism but impersonal and not theistic. Sure realizing Brahman is nice of course. But in Vaisnavism we don’t accept Brahman as supreme.

[@SadanandaSadananda-rm3jp]

Hinduism is not problematic but you are not capable to understand philosophies, dwaita, advaita, vishitadwaita, all are true. Hinduism is also Monotheistic, OM word itself indicates one god

[@Rama-tanu]

@@SadanandaSadananda-rm3jp all the philosophies are true but not equal. Just as both levels of mathematics, kindergarten level and university level are true, one is higher than the other, with the lower level of mathematics included. Same goes here with the philosophies in Hinduism. But if you really understand the philosophy you should be able to know how to apply the philosophy. And not many are capable of doing that. Thus creating unnecessary disturbance in society in the name of Hinduism. Advaita-vada, taught by Adi Sankaracarya, and Vaisnavism by Vaisnavas such as Sri Ramanujacharya, Sri Madhvacarya, Sri Nimbarkacarya, Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, Sri Vallabhacarya and more do not agree on the highest truth. According to Sankaracarya, Brahman is the highest truth, superior to Vishnu/Krsna. The Vaisnavas put Vishnu/Krsna as supreme, being the source of Brahman. Vishnu/Krsna is pervading the whole creation and beyond as Brahman. There is a huge difference here. Advaita is there in some vaisnava philosophies(vishishtadvaita, acintya-bhedabheda tattva) but it is not the highest understanding. This is the discussions between sankarites and Vaisnavas for centuries.

[@amogha3136]

Kundalini is also known as secretion of Christ old, old testament, book of enoch, awakening devine and being like chirst is real teaching, not this filtered down into commercial religion, Christianity.... Christians don't know it as well as i a indian yogi knows and loves chirst, so yeah come to present moment and resesrch, religion is what conciouness gave to allivate suffering from humanity, all are same, if a persom stops the mind he'll know

[@Peace-f5c]

Jesus has to do nothing with Sanatan Dharma. Their are teaching by many people, but apart from teaching the essence of Abrahamic religion is completely different. So, he's not for Hindus. Radhe Shyam 🕉

[@amitpratap7551]

Stop stealing and plagiarising. Stick to the old testament .

[@fellowgoyimwhite7630]

​@@Peace-f5c Christ studied sanathan Dharma in india like in Puri and buddhism like in tibet

[@Peace-f5c]

@@fellowgoyimwhite7630 There's currently no such evidence but it's true then he's just a preacher of Buddhism and Hinduism. So, Christians should drop that idea of considering him son of God blah blah....

[@Peace-f5c]

@@fellowgoyimwhite7630 I searched about it then find out there's no such evidence right now but if it's true then he's nothing rather than just a preacher of great Sanatan Dharma and Buddhist philosophy. World should know that there's no point worshipping a religious student rather they should come to right path. Radhe Shyam 🕉🙏

[@fnmidas7936]

Weird how a christian community channel talking about dharmic faith sanatan dharma , lmao no any hindu or hinduism community discuss about christanity The biased and false is clear visible

[@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658]

I know at least 1 Hindu chaneII that talks about Christianity. But there’s nothing wrong with saying why you disagree with a religion. That’s the way you find truth. Why are you not Christian?

[@fnmidas7936]

@@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658 yeah ,noting wrong but it definetly wrong to say about something that is fault ,hinduism is main is varna system not caste system , plus reason i become hindu is becuz it is more vast and it is proper not like you can get away with your sins with praising lord , and here god is both evil and good , praise whoever god suits you plus meditiation ,yoga and music is make my life better I love jesus he died our sins but i still go to church if i want ,in hinduism its not denied to praise other becuz its oldest and it never had any concept of other faith's god

[@aashishsharma8730]

If you havent read the bhagwadgita than u have no nothing about the cast system, the system works like a office who ever fits there job description, if you are smart you will go up and if you are not you will get a lower job description. eventually if you progress you can rise to become the manager of the company or the director. Kindly get the facts right.

[@shaifunnessa7816]

Hey Indian cultures yoga meditation history explained please make video

[@RB97531]

It is interesting that this video states that there is no proof of rebirth, but is willing to accept born to a virgin, existence of God, Son of God, rising from the dead! Amazing!!

[@param888]

whether you believe it in Hinduism or not do not stop believing in neeb karoli baba. just google who he was?

[@raajrajan1956]

So you have to define two words Hinduism and truth.another question is who decides whether any thing is truth? How do uou know what he says is correcct

[@watersprite333]

Wow - my friend, you have much research left to do, does not even skim the surface, more like a drop in the ocean.

[@sagarchanchad7700]

is hinduism the truth??? - this is wrong question hinduism is all about to find the ultimate/eternal truth. concept of god in hinduism is very similar to concept of energy in science generally energy is formless but when we observe it, it may converted into different type of particles and waves as per wave particle duality. god is very similar to this concept god is formless but when we observe it it may take different forms or menifastations as per observer's reference of frame. see, energy is constant it can't be created or distroyed and it remains even after dissolution of universe in form of dark energy. energy is eternal. That's why hinduism is also called as sanatan dharm which means eternal

[@orginyigam732]

Hinduism is Sanatan and shashwat... The way of the seekers is sanatan... The true pining for truth is Hinduism... It doesn't have a commandment like some stupid desert cult, it doesn't have one prophet like some cult in desert who was punished by the romans for seeking political power... It always have been it always will be... No matter which "religion" you follow one day when you actually see the truth with your own atman, then know that that is Hinduism.

[@just_a_wholesome_panda]

Hinduism is really deep! so much so that we can't pinpoint all of the ideas of it with our brains. The eternal truth and will take another eternity to completely be understood😅❤ but you gotta love the selflessness in it all though!! I will always be perplexed by how much of it you can ever know in 1 lifetime and how much would still be left to be known and be discovered throughout the entirety of time. It's a religion that will still exist without its seekers, because it is a lot more than just a "religion"

[@utsav_deep]

Caste is not in scriptures, Varna (which people translate to caste in english) system is there but its is quality and action based and not by birth. In Bhagwadgeeta's 4th chapter, Srikrishna says to Arjuna, that Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra group of four varnas, by division विभाग of guna गुण (quality, attribute) and karma कर्म (good deeds or bad deeds) I have created. In this way, even though I am the doer of those creations etc., consider me - the imperishable God - to be the actual non-doer. ॥ 4-13 चातुर्वर्ण्यं मया सृष्टं गुणकर्मविभागशः । तस्य कर्तारमपि मां विद्ध्यकर्तारमव्ययम्‌ ॥ ४-१३ ॥

[@praneshmk5284]

Conclusion is so idiotic, "Jesus says about multiple gods so Hinduism is not the true way to salvation". First of all Hinduism is not the appropriate name it should be sanatan dharma. It's the way of life, no matter what you are male female or any gender or nothing to be recognised as a perticular one, rich or poor that too in this modern world you have access to everything. You can achieve moksha in this Era very easily. Also there are no many gods there are many manifestations of the same God. You have covered many realities but unfortunately your ego doesn't allow you to seek the truth.

[@igustisatya3802]

Sometime those varna system is misunderstood and misdirected

[@mukulsingh3902]

Hinduism is well tested and experimented , they makes it true

[@karthikr599]

Definitely Jesus is not an incarnation of Lord Vishnu. Bible says spread Christianity all over the world. Why would Lord Vishnu want to destroy Hinduism (the Dharma) he created?

[@americandesi5703]

Sanātana-dharma aka Vaidika Hinduism (in contrast to Neo-Hindu, new-age sects which do not faithfully follow the Vedas) is truth. It is eternal truth. Any and all creeds which go against the Vedas are useless and shrouded in tamo-guṇa, This is the view of Manu and stated in Manu-dharma-śāstra. This video makes the classic mistake that most other people presenting Hinduism make. He confuses "Hinduism" as a term referring to a religion with "Hinduism" as a term referring to the indigenous culture of India. But these are two different things. Culturally, Hindus are not militantly averse to traditions different from their own. But that is not the same thing as saying that they accept all other traditions. "Hinduism" as outsiders understand covers numerous *distinct* religious traditions such as Vaiṣṇavas, Śaivas, Śāktas, Smārthas, and so on. Each has their own deity and own philosophies, and they are irreconcilable. But culturally, they all at least theoretically accept the authority of the Vedas (some more so than others) and follow superficially similar practices. Emphasis on "superficially" similar. Vedas which are also known as śruti are apauruṣeya. This means they have no author, period. They are co-eternal with Bhagavān. Just like nobody says that gravitation started when Newton codified it into a law, similarly the reality revealed by the Vedas did not start at some time. It always was. The correct translation for varṇa is NOT "caste." Varṇa as described in the Vedas and Vaidika texts is part of one's day-to-day sādhana and has nothing to do with socioeconomic hierarchies to enforce social privilege, as in the case of the European Christian caste system with its monarchs, nobles, clergy, and peasants. One is born into a varṇa based on his past karmas and consciousness, and thus inherits a set of duties that one must perform selflessly as works of devotion dedicated to Bhagavān. This is mentioned in Bhagavad-gītā chapters 2-5. Performed in this way, varṇa-dharma liberates one from the cycle of birth and death by cleansing one's self of one's past karmas that bind one to the material mode of existence. Gurus are NOT "incarnations of Viṣṇu" I have no idea where Ronin Church got this idea. A guru is indispensable for understanding the Vedas, because truth presupposes a certain degree of purity. Hinduism is not like Christianity where everyone can read the scripture, get his or her own idea, and then have violent conflicts over which interpretation is correct. A disciple needs a proper guru to guide him, to tell him when he errs, to help keep him on the right path, and ultimately to reveal the inner secrets of the Vedas. A guru is a devotee of Viṣṇu, and one who worships Viṣṇu must necessarily revere His devotees. Just like if you are respect the chief executive of a foreign country, you must show respect to his ambassador who represents him. Jesus was NOT an "incarnation of Viṣṇu." There is no śāstric basis for this idea, which was only invented by some modern, new-age, syncretic cults. As mentioned previously, anyone who goes against the Vedas is spewing forth a useless doctrine that will not help anyone. Quoting Manu: yā vedabāhyāḥ smṛtayo yāśca kāśca kudṛṣṭayaḥ । 
 sarvāstā niṣphalāḥ pretya tamoniṣṭhā hi tāḥ smṛtāḥ ॥ manu 12.95 ॥
 utpadyante cyavante ca yānyato'nyāni kāni cit ।
 tānyarvākkālikatayā niṣphalānyanṛtāni ca ॥ manu 12.96 ॥
 “Those ‘revealed texts’ that are outside the Veda, as also all the false theories, are useless, even when carried to perfection; as they have been declared to be founded on ‘darkness.’ Those other (doctrines) which spring up and perish are all worthless and false, being of modern growth.” (Manu-Saṁhitā 12.95-96) [translated by Ganganath Jha] Christianity does not even accept the elementary basics of spiritual life, namely the difference between the Self and the body and the eternal nature of all Selves along with matter. Christians like other Abrahamics believe in ex nihilo creation, which logically makes the faults of the creation due to the faults or cruel whims of their creator. And who can accept as a doctrine the idea that one must surrender to a supposedly benevolent deity who, if one does not accept him after one lifetime, will be eternally tortured for the rest of one's existence? These and other bizarre aspects of Christianity aren't just anathema to Hinduism; they are an affront to common sense. Brahman is NOT "different manifestations of the same principle." The word "Brahman" is derived from the word "bṛhat" which means "greatness." In its most common usage, Brahman denotes the Parama Puruṣa (Supreme Person), also known as Bhagavān and Paramātmā. vadanti tat tattva-vidas tattvaṁ yaj jñānam advayam । brahmeti paramātmeti bhagavān iti śabdyate ॥ Bhā. Pu. 1.2.11 ॥ “Those who possess the knowledge of the Truth (tattva) call the knowledge of non-duality as the Truth. It is also variously designated as Brahman, Paramātman or Bhagavān.” (Śrīmad Bhāgavata Purāṇa 1.2.11) [translated by J.L. Shastri]
 There is no equal to Brahman, period. anejad ekaṁ manaso javīyo nainad devā āpnuvan pūrvam arṣat । tad dhāvato ’nyān atyeti tiṣṭhat tasminn apo mātariśvā dadhāti ॥ Īśopaniṣad 4 ॥
 “That (Paramātman) is unmoving; the One without an equal; swifter than the mind. The devas have not attained it which has already reached them. Remaining stationary it overtakes others that run ahead. By it Vāyu bears water.” (Īśopaniṣad 4) [translated by N.S. Anantha Rangacharya] The other devas (you people erroneously translate the term as "gods") are NOT equal to Brahman. There are many, many statements to the effect that the devas are subservient to Brahman. For example: bhayādasyāgnistapati bhayāttapati sūryaḥ । bhayādindraśca vāyuśca mṛtyurdhāvati pañcamaḥ ॥ K.U. 2.3.3 ॥ "From fear of Him fire burns; the sun shines from fear of Him. Indra, Vāyu and Death, the fifth run from fear of Him." (Kaṭhopaniṣad 2.3.3) [translated by Dr. N.S. Anantha Rangacharya] Again, Hinduism (the religion based on Vedas) does NOT have "many gods." People who talk like this are cringe. The translation of "deva" is not "god." The proper translation of the term "deva" is simply "deva." You cannot use Judeo-Christian terms to understand Vaidik concepts. Here is one example of why - the devas are posts held by exceptionally pious jīvas. All living beings are jīvas, and the births they get are due to the mixture of karmas that forces them to take another birth. The jīvas who take birth as devas have exceptionally meritorious karma. How is such a being a "god" in the Judeo-Christian conception? In fact, Abrahamic religions have no equivalent concept to what the devas are. Once again, Ronin Church is confusing Hinduism the culture with Hinduism the religion of the Vedas. There are many religious traditions that worship different deities. But the religion Hinduism that is based on Vedas has only ONE Supreme Entity. The many "Hindu" religious traditions you see mostly in India differ in their fidelity to the Vaidik canon and that is why they have differences in their objects of worship. The Self IS eternal and often "Self" is translated as "soul," although this is problematic. Which Christians speak of "soul," they mean that capacity of an individual to recognize divine truth, which they will never do because Christianity is a false, man-made religion. When Hindus use the term "soul" they mean the "Self." To put it simply, we do NOT lose our souls. We *are* souls and we get bodies based on our karmas. TLDR: This person's presentation of "Hinduism" is lazy, utterly bereft of any research of orthodox Hindu doctrine, and completely confuses Indian culture aka Hinduism with Sanātana-dharma aka Hinduism.