Is "Salvator Mundi" a real Leonardo da Vinci painting?

[@upendraverma5435]

Is "Salvatore Mundi" a real Leonardo da Vinci painting? The one who bought it for $450 million: I hope so😳

[@grammoore]

@Brian Reiki Your right. These high art prices are purposely inflated.

[@Hk-hu1ky]

It would be perfect for drug dealing

[@utah658]

It's an investment with great dividend return. Scarcity creates value.

[@DoggoWillink]

It was bought by a Saudi Prince apparently, although who knows I guess? If it was, they wouldn’t really need to launder money.

[@MSALSARRAF]

Doggo Willink trust me they don’t need to launder money😂 even if they had dirty money they can just put it in the bank because no one would dare speak. But i dont think they do they are one of the 3 top wealthiest families in the world.

[@Mrpallekuling]

It must be impossible to determine if the painting is by da Vinci or partly by da Vinci and partly by his students, or fully by his students. But, apparently: The world needed a new da Vinci. Christie's needed the commission. A prince needed to spend some money.

[@힐만94]

yepp... it was like an old joke, when a sheikh and his wife visit art gallery and purchase lots of expensive paintings, and later say "ok darling, we've got the greeting cards, now let's search for the presents..."

[@phmwu7368]

da Vinci's studio worked with artists like Bernardino Luini and Giovanni Boltraffio... great painters of the 16th century High Renaissance !

[@paulaltman9751]

There is absolutely no provenance and "the experts" make incorrect attributions all the time. Just look in the basements of countless museums...

[@commonsense31]

No, They have known for over 100 years that he did a paint a painting of The Savior Jesus Christs. Through Historical archives, Letters, and Historical documents. So they knew it had existed. Do you have any Idea how much art of Famous Painters were stolen during WW2 by the Nazis. That hasn't been found yet! We are talking Billions worth of Art. But I just read who were actually the ones that Confirmed and agreed that it was a Real Leonardo Da Vinci I think it was 25 of the Best experts from that Period, on top of Individual Da Vinci Scholars, All of the Italian experts and Historians in the time of Da Vinci were alive. Also validated it, Through their Historical documents. They were extremely skeptical, when they first heard about the Painting. They were asked by the Italian Government to give their opinion on top of the Information they could provide to see if any indications that it could be Authentic. They looked at everything, X-rays, Parchment, Colors, Took Test of the Paint, Color composition, And compared all of it with his other paintings. We are talking about looking at the individual air bobbles through Microscopes, and looked for any sign of Forgery. They also came back and Validated it was a Real Leonardo. I think its funny, That just because one expert wrote a book. And questioned the Confirmation. By research he had done on his own, He has never done any test, or Looked at it in real life other than when it was up for sale. I'm sorry, He ask some valid questions but it is exactly that he just starts the process of discrediting the Validation, Done by the best independent Experts in the world, That have spend their entire life to studying Leonardo Da Vinci and Italian History. And how did he do that? By writing and publishing a Book about it, And then goes on a promotion tour of the book on different Media Sites. Where he questions the authenticity to us Normal People, Who doesn't comprehend that any painting can be worth 400 Million USD. And have been Scammed and Manipulated by Companies, Banks, Billionaires and Governments all our life. Of course normal People will jump on his side, Because we want the Rich to feel how we feel. And if one of them bought a Painting for 400million he is an idiot. But to Discredit the best experts in this field, that actually did all of the investigation and research from the Fibers in the Parchment down to the Air bubbles in the paint. and they say it is from the period and the colors misture, what they consist off and the Dating of all those test shows it was painted in that period with materials from that period. I think its an Historian that wrote a book and saw it as a opportunity to cash in big, By being the guy who claims its fake.

[@toddaulner5393]

I have at least 200 hours of research, I say it is!

[@yourboyfefe5736]

Imagine it’s some peasant kid that painted it

[@BranchedOut]

still worth half a billion to me. you just wont find me buying it

[@jholid6y]

Jesus Christ said: “Jesus Christ” when he heard it sold for half a billion. This painting can feed all the poor for years.

[@gavinreid5387]

The person who sold it can feed them now.

[@SGprooo]

Gavin Reid no

[@gavinreid5387]

@@SGprooo why not? He now has the money.

[@SGprooo]

Gavin Reid You’re a kid aren’t you

[@gavinreid5387]

@@SGprooo but I understand economics.

[@TJSPARKLE]

The fact that the Mona Lisa when missing added to it mysteriousness and value and whoever has bought the salvator Mundi is probably trying to do exactly the same thing.

[@Jericho-pn3zi]

Essentially it doesn’t matter. The painting is worth however much someone is willing to pay for it.

[@matswessling6600]

it does matter: the buyer only pays so much because he believs the lie.

[@user-zg3gh8xg9v]

1 (ONE) pound for the weird mexican bandit from the american fifties movie !

[@user-zg3gh8xg9v]

@@matswessling6600 What lie ?? There is an interesting painting we are speaking of and if they have this kind of money and are willing to throw them on art then I for one won't cry myself to sleep over this. Also, since when did we collectively agree on hoarders... oh, I am sorry >< have the god-given right to take our chance of seeing an art piece, dare I say, even the original ? With all the precautions and required methods of conservation, of course.

[@matswessling6600]

@@user-zg3gh8xg9v the lie that this is what leonardo painted.

[@user-zg3gh8xg9v]

@@matswessling6600 They told us in the video that it could be just started by him and finished by his apprentices or could have just been his apprentices's work start to finish. No one's lying, we simply don't know. Also, my initial point still stands.

[@beebee3333]

The painting has been excessively (and poorly) restored. It's become a hybrid, in which some areas have been painted by a master and other areas by a clumsy restorer, which overall gives the painting a perplexing appearance. Images of the painting before the current restoration show significant damage. Filling in the damage is not the proper way to restore a masterpiece and preserve its integrity.

[@treatb09]

She destroyed it or its a copy. I have photos ive compared. Everything is changed. She even added ripples on the shoulder that werent there. She should be held accountable. The face went from depth and brilliance to a flat puddle of over laid paint.

[@beebee3333]

@@treatb09 Yes, the face is terrible, which was the first thing that made me wonder if this was a Leonardo. But the hands and some of the clothing are done very well. Then when I saw how much it was restored I understood: what's left of Leonardo's work is good, but the restorer's painted-in areas (including much of the face) are awful.

[@treatb09]

@@beebee3333 i compared various pictures. In some clips. Maybe it was here. They showed a change between the two. And you can slo mo it to see they are two different paintings.

[@M4th3u54ndr4d3]

@@treatb09 yes, they even changed the little foldings of the clothes (sorry about my english). We can even see a full resolution comparison. It is totally different

[@jessiejoseph1093]

Poorly restored? I have stood 6 feet away from it and it made me weep. It is breathtaking.

[@faizsk864]

For 450 mil $ i think leonardo himself could have painted for centuries and centuries without complaining.

[@arah8998]

The journey from one of the cheapest art piece sold in an auction to the most expensive art piece in an auction

[@michaelhenicker]

The Louvre is now saying (as depicted in a new documentary) that it was from Leonardo’s workshop and not only by the painter himself. Ouch!

[@kathynorman7112]

for real?

[@morenaczarnecki5066]

I don't think it makes it any less valuable

[@charlyrob7334]

@@morenaczarnecki5066 Historically it doesn't. But money wise? You bet.

[@2011blueman]

@NierUnity : Art The documentary "Savior for Sale: Da Vinci's Lost Masterpiece?" says the Louvre forensically examined the painting and determined it wasn't a Leonardo, so they refused to display it next to the Mona Lisa, which is what Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia demanded, so it wasn't displayed in the Leonardo exhibition.

[@kkesarr]

can't trust them, they want it next to the mona lisa

[@RetroBerner]

MBS has it on his yacht. He's not gonna put it in a museum, because any chance that they prove it's not legit and he loses 400m POOF!

[@WhatsGoing0nHere]

Steve Martino Which is the equivalent of me losing a couple peanuts.

[@rubenscott3972]

They make 1 billion a day

[@janina8559]

Couldn’t happen to a nicer Dictator! If I was this book Author I would watch my back! Thats what Jamaal Khashoggi would say for a bunch less money at stake!

[@kathynorman7112]

hopefully no pirates at sea!!

[@kathynorman7112]

@@WhatsGoing0nHere lol

[@Halloffamer-km9qw]

Painting : $400M Taxes $75M 👁👄👁

[@kidsvideo9169]

I mean was it overpriced yes, overvalued, no. The guy doing the auction was instigating to get the price higher and even took a sip of water to quench his thirst after knowing he had suckered these guys into going higher and higher.

[@tomthomassony8607]

In the UK we have an expression ‘Trigger’s Broom’ that neatly sums up this ‘picture’. Trigger’s Broom refers to a road sweeper who proudly proclaimed he had used the same broom to sweep the roads for the last 10 years......”I’ve used the same broom, it’s only had 15 new handles and 20 new heads.”

[@Mooooooof]

Thanks Dave

[@shapursasan9019]

Leonardo da Vinci would have never put a man’s head on a woman’s body. He was a better artist then that.

[@Dielonthug]

It is very interesting that restoration is considered acceptable in the art world. It other collectables, say sports cards- this is considered extremely taboo. In fact, there are many companies that are being exposed because of this.

[@daniyalg2436]

That's a very interesting excellent point you make.. Sooner or later with 4D printers - who knows what is authentic or what. I've been told of examples of Ultrq Ferraris being cloned with old parts and 1960s steel parts to make them appear original and unaltered. Even chassis numbers switched etc. Very Very Murky World

[@DOMINNIMOD198]

I mean paintings are one of a kind, each one is unique, so i guess restoration respecting the artist original intention is always good. Sports cards are different as in there are many produced of each so it's more similar to a economy

[@adamr9570]

I’m so glad, this is the same auction that auctioned my dad’s painting for 31,000 dollars..what a difference but still a good price.

[@tats_sacs]

Wait..... The Mona lisa has fingerprints all over it when Da vinci used his fingers to create texture and mixed colors. So why don’t they see if it matches? So did they restore it to the point where none of his prints can be found on the texture of the paint? That would be convenient. There is a documentary of this on how they proved one painting is real by matching the prints Da vinci left on the paint. I remember the narrator saying it’s better than a signature.

[@henrylivingstone2800]

There’s no way to prove that the fingerprints are da Vinci’s. There’s the issue of handlers, assistants, later restorers and owners who may have imparted finger prints. And in any case one must have a complete print to discern any significant identification. And I don’t think da Vinci used his fingers to mix colors directly onto the board, he probably mixed colors on his palette then applied with brush (if he used his fingers at all). And using your fingers to create texture and mix colors doesn’t leave full prints.

[@earthwormsally2075]

Imagine if they find another one of this resulting it becoming the real painting...

[@smey02]

I really dont get how it was sold for 1k...even if its not by Leonardo, but its likely somehow connected to him, its 500 years old and still looks really cool in its own way...and now when it seems like it was painted by Leonardo everybody says how beautiful it is 😅 wth

[@rodjones117]

It looked very different when it was sold for a grand.

[@charlyrob7334]

The emperors new clothes.

[@2011blueman]

When it sold for $1,000 it was an almost completely destroyed old painting by an unknown artist. Now it has been completely overpainted and sold with the false attribution to Leonardo. If Saudi Arabia tried to resell it today it wouldn't go over 50 million.

[@contendingforthefaith9897]

The painting is a picture of the Antichrist, and a reflection of the one who restored it.

[@kennylong7281]

The painting clearly looks like the work of Leonardo's student, and young lover, Gian Giacomo Caprotti da Oreno, better known as Salaì. Anyone who knows Salai's work, can immediately see his hand here!

[@Xample999]

No one ever knows if Leonardo had lovers. He would spend time with his students but stating that he had “young lovers” is kinda bold to say.

[@daniyalg2436]

@3:50 So the darker areas have been restored. Interesting... The 2nd thumb has been restored. Co incidence.. Oh Just one more thing.... what would Columbo think of this ?

[@maximhollandnederlandthene7640]

Is it the money worth, Thinking bought for 45 pound and later 1000 dollar. Did the buyer do any properly research to know what he's buying ???

[@daniyalg2436]

My theory is The Buyers Bought it to SLAP DOWN QATAR. (Little Brother) Reference Card Players and Tahitian Ladies: Understand that Big Brother (KSA) has been annoyed with QATAR for years. Proxy Wars going on with Louvre Abu Dhabi , Doha museum and Paris. Just Remember: Mona Lisa aka Gioconda has up to 5 known Copies. Do your research about the light test on Mona Lisa and Virgin of the Rocks recent tests. The Base sketches are not the same LOOOOOOL.. This Game is Not About Art !!! These are Different Kinda Game$

[@maximhollandnederlandthene7640]

Colombo would check all facts, old and most recent owner. Silent witnesses .... What more to check ?

[@JosephYoussefOfficial]

Simon says gimme 400 mil $ 3:44

[@horianescu2821]

Idk but my favorite one is Girl with a Pearl Earring or Adele Bloch Bauer

[@henrylivingstone2800]

Those painting are also very expensive any painting by Vermeer or Klimt will set you back 7-8 digits.

[@victoriahann4222]

No había visto su mano, no pueder ser! y la expresión de sus ojos es indescriptible y todo su rostro es bellísimo, un hallazgo muy valioso. Gracias por venir a mí sus bendiciones y a toda la península arábiga!

[@Tzreoaor]

The painting is of Jesus Christ. In his human form he was a man. Not a woman

[@antonio.x22]

@@Tzreoaor no matters. it is the imaginary version of someone about Jesus.

[@freddiejones4598]

I think what people should be talking about is how the auction house made 50.3 million dollars

[@Ghostygoon]

Imagine selling it for $1,000 or $60 I might kms

[@RedDiamondXYZ]

Even with a million installments, I cant afford 450$ a month.. Edit: It was around 450$ Mn incl taxes

[@garrmanbros]

And the insurance costed $750 million

[@NZcoco]

After all of the phenomenal stuff being being said about this painting the news lady comes up with the deepest comment of all: "it's a pretty picture" lmao 🤣🤣🤣 like wtf lady are you 5yrs old lol

[@amcconnell6730]

Emperor's new clothes. :) That's ALL it is - a pretty picture.

[@TheZenytram]

Mona lisa is one too, a pretty picture that an old man hold on to it until his last breath, we over value junk for all the history

[@nat0106951]

iTs a PreTty Pictuare of JeSus ChRist.

[@Bcplay]

All it takes to prove real or not, is to invite someone who has met Christ to come verify it, because the person in the picture looks like the bakery owner next to my house.

[@Danoliveira3]

Thats one handsome baker

[@michaelsibindi5227]

This is Cesare Borgia: son of pope Alexander VI. A murderous , incestuous homosexual, Da Vinci's boyfriend. Yeshua ha Mashiach was a black-skinned, curly-haired Israelite as depicted in the Orthodox icons, coptic icons and Roman Catacombs. josephus also described Christ as a short, black skinned, curly hair men. The Bible also describes him as being so not this long-haired white skinned effeminate European man that has been used as an image of Christ for centuries to hide the true identity of the Israelites. knowledge is increased the truth is out halleluYah,!!

[@Eza_yuta]

That's one handsome baker

[@neilhayes4054]

I don’t find this as Leo’s best work

[@VillonArk]

Shutter Island was great

[@manuelellis1969]

I think someone went back in time and made him paint or discovered that way

[@Stinktierchen]

For me the unrestored painting would have had much more value. Now it is kind of "abused" and "stained". I would enjoy much more to see and have it in its most original form than have some people overpaint it. What a shame!

[@yourboyfefe5736]

Honestly I believe it should have been left alone. Untouched and unrestored.

[@calebvaz]

I agree. That would definitely add to the mystique of the painting. But the argument to that would be verifying it's authenticity. So in turn they would NEED to restore it. I like the idea of it being untouched though.

[@adaeverleigh9584]

Unfortunately it wasn't purchased for a museum.

[@maximhollandnederlandthene7640]

Where are the detailed foto's from the painting before restoration ? All would make befor restoration isn't it !?

[@kjvids268]

Thank you!! Someone who is thinking deeper. I had the same question. I want to see the untouched original

[@Toaster_luvin]

Most expensive thing ever sold at auction*

[@roberttreborable]

The Da Vinci Code, has made Dan Brown world famous. So it should be no surprise that someone would try and jump on the bandwagon with a story about The Salvatore Mundi .....

[@VenitaSheppard]

Hmmmm 🤔 why would the prince end up of all people buying a picture of Christ.🧐

[@khaderach19]

its not about the image, its about flipping later for a higher price.

[@omarfaruque98xy]

In Islam there is Christ actually. He is a prophet called Isa in the Quran, only difference is Islam clearly states he is not the son of God.

[@wcsxwcsx]

Yes, the irony is strong. I can only assume that it's part of a long term financial strategy.

[@kastaway-mtx]

They don't care what's painted on the canvas. Currency goes up and down, but paintings, especially ones from Da Vinci will always continue to rise as it ages. If it ever does come out that this is 100% legit no questions, then the price value will skyrocket. I also assume they wanted to keep it out of the Vatican. Those two were fighting it out past the 300 million mark. It was cut throat, 400 million is higher than some countries GDP. The fact they would even think about paying that kind of money they had to have been at least 95% sure it was real.

[@bigbulk688]

?, ?, It never went on display at Louvre Abu Dhabi. I have been waiting for that since the sale. But it seems like it dones the yacht of Mohammad Bin Salman the Saudi Prince and that Abu Dhabi prince had only did the bidding on his behalf. So it’s gone in private collection now. Not in museum.

[@Nerdzombiedisco]

The restored right eye is terrible.

[@anaysayersyes]

I guess no one would dare to touch it. Of course the last restorer realized that, but it's a high-stakes move to alter it, I doubt anyone would.

[@anaysayersyes]

As someone who draws portraits the eyes to me is an extremely sensitive area to refine once you've laid your initial strokes. One stroke or glint and you alter the whole mood of the art

[@origamimambo545]

That full frontal shallow pose alone says this is not a da Vinci. Why would he do that even here when he never did that before?

[@Harry-rj6kh]

I think it's one of those PAINT BY NUMBER things they had out 50 or 60 years ago. I opted for the Grandma Moses one with the farm scene.

[@jnorth1000]

There is no way that is by the genius Leonardo da Vinci. Pause at 2:40 and take a good look at the eyes. For one thing, the right eye is significantly higher than the left eye. And you can also see how badly and amateurish they are painted. As a portrait artist, for me it is very important to align the eyes and render them as life-like as possible, being that the eyes are the most important feature in a portrait. It is clearly the work of one of his students that tried to emulate his style, or by a forger from the past that tried to fake a da Vinci for profit.

[@matswessling6600]

no. those are artifactsof the restoration. The major part of the painting is created from scratch by the restorer...

[@jnorth1000]

No. You are wrong...@@matswessling6600

[@reneebaptiste8550]

It’s actually sickening to me that a person can afford to buy one painting for 400 million. But we have a world full of sick hungry children

[@picassoboy52]

And it's his responsibility to feed them?

[@Niex_Knox]

@@picassoboy52 No, but it is a sure sign of the state humankind is in and why the world is such a mess. The fact that you too, could sleep knowing what those 450million could have done. But you just dont get it.

[@whatthefisfilipinx]

Life ain't fair. Get used to it.

[@truepatriot2093]

Wahhhhhhhhhh

[@varuna6089]

It's no longer about art. It's all about those obnoxious price tags. Almost as if the painting becomes more attractive as it's price increases.

[@michaelvaughn3703]

That’s art. Welcome to our world.

[@MrEdWeirdoShow]

Now, the REAL mystery is the usual one, a gross error made by most artists through history - who can show us even ONE "indoor wall" background in real life, looking like a dark brown muddy mess of GRAVY? Nobody, that's who!

[@freeqwerqwer]

I lived thru 2019 so how is it that I'd never heard of this DaVinci painting in the news?

[@j.b.9410]

It's cause you and I are poor. It's marketed to the rich.

[@d.l.7399]

In the world of money: of course it's a real Leonardo... 🤭

[@odoacredacalcutta5085]

the smile and the the general androginy of the picture points towards leonardo... but as a fact, if you look at the eyes, it's so damaged that you can't really look at it for 2 long without getting the feeling of being fooled. Be it a Leonardo or not, there is no way this painting should be worth more than many others painted by similar geniuses that are in very good shape. I see art of marketing in display here, rather than art itself

[@drinny26]

I think the painting of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress is worth more.

[@davidmdyer838]

The hands are anatomically impossible so it is very doubtably done by an anatomical expert.

[@The_Savage_Wombat]

Nardo was a good guy

[@bizarity406]

wahts the classical piece starting 0:43

[@nicholasshade1366]

I love the Salvatore Mundi.♥️ It’s so beautiful. BEAUTIFUL LIKE A TIGER. 🐅 I love Art. ❤️🖼

[@slantyb22]

That picture is demonic Google it right now and stare in it eyes you’ll see.

[@heroncabo3756]

Grandes obras

[@d0ntreply]

hold on, there's 'restoration' where you just clean up gunk and wear and tear. then there's painting over the original, which is the case here. so your telling me, some poor bum spent $450mill on a partial davinci and some random lady restorer lol. get a refund, they just got prank'd.

[@ethansancti2864]

Christie's was able to sell for $450M plus a painting that is merely "attributed" to Da Vinci and heavily restored and modified. That is salemanship at its finest. Same auction house that sold the suflower painting to a Japanese that is heavily criticised as fake.

[@ingeweeda]

Jezus was a dark skinned man... so this must be his French cousin.

[@Joe-oy1nq]

Representation is the presentation to the sale!

[@yutubvlogs8889]

put that away from mr. bean

[@josephpestello1663]

One of the greatest con's since Madoff!

[@mariesettonni2460]

Why is she looking at the ceiling the whole time 😂😂😂

[@travishaynes9682]

She's lying , that's why !!

[@afrobryan]

The painting itself is a contradiction of what it represents. So In my opinion of those who seek it, become distant from what it represents. We live in a society where we spend 400 mill on a painting rather then using it for the benefit of those unfortunate. I'm not religious at all, as in I don't follow any religion, but I do believe in god. I just wonder though, for those who believe in Jesus, do you think if he saw this going on, that he would approve?!,

[@dm0065]

I can set your mind at ease maybe. That money isnt gone. It didnt disapear when the buyer paid for the painting. It went to people who spent or invested it. Paid salaries with it. You never need to worry when people spend a great deal on things because money goes round and it helps people, all that matters is that its moving.

[@michaelsibindi5227]

This is Cesare Borgia: son of pope Alexander VI. A murderous , incestuous homosexual, Da Vinci's boyfriend. Yeshua ha Mashiach was a black-skinned, curly-haired Israelite as depicted in the Orthodox icons, coptic icons and Roman Catacombs. josephus also described Christ as a short, black skinned, curly hair men. The Bible also describes him as being so not this long-haired white skinned effeminate European man that has been used as an image of Christ for centuries to hide the true identity of the Israelites. knowledge is increased the truth is out halleluYah,!!

[@betosanchez6929]

@@michaelsibindi5227 Here as well? Seriously what is your deal?

[@henrylivingstone2800]

michael sibindi But it’s not though.

[@heroncabo3756]

A obra tem uma mistura ..bem pra depois passar para tela.dumas camadas de tinta...p depois fazer.a obra...o segredo vem profundo....real

[@tavoamaya798]

Who is that main guy they talk with?

[@Macreator]

amazing

[@toddlevin]

And today, we now know that The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, The Louvre in Paris, and The Museo Nacional del Prado (and all their respective curatorial teams) have unanimously declared this painting to definitely *NOT* be by the hand of Leonardo, and what is more, they have all unequivocally gone on the record and stated that they will *NOT* exhibit this painting with any attribution to Leonardo.

[@conradosulit6260]

It is Authentic work by Leonardo da Vinci, If only you could see what I discovered.

[@toddlevin]

@@conradosulit6260 Uh huh. Your KZbin videos on the subject have a grand total of 600 views, and I'm talking about the chief curators of The Met, The Louvre, and The Prado. I think I'll go with them, but thanks for playing.

[@conradosulit6260]

My basis is The Correct and compatible setting Of secret messages.

[@conradosulit6260]

My question. The symbol of the wound on the right side of Salvator Mundi is also a symbol of Jesus Christ.

[@conradosulit6260]

It's sad but I still believe that it was Leonardo's real work, because I saw the secret it holds. Wordless Holy Bible What I saw.

[@Max_m]

Painting was never displayed in France, the French government after extensive testing could not say with 100% certainty that it was fully a da Vinci and wouldn’t have hang next to others

[@OneVision-mi2hb]

This is precisely why it can no longer be sold. Every art collector in the world keeps their hands off it. Ultimately, the Louvre Museum has proven that it is not a complete work by Leonardo. He may have contributed something.

[@frbmp5100]

While we are discussing the originality, the buyer just made another $450 mill.

[@andyroo9381]

There was a documentary made about this painting. It came out within the last year. Is it the real thing?

[@miloradkozic260]

From 1000 dolars to 400 milions. Hmmmmm

[@gavinreid5387]

Due to extremely competitive bidders determined to win.

[@cleopatra2875]

I'm here because I just read the same comment in CNN...not real? But it depends on the one that's looking. If in person his eyes so real. Then it's good. Because just like monalisa, it's not the authenticity that people love.... it's her smile, that smirk. I hope they put it in place where people can see.

[@MOSP14]

There will never be a way to know if this is a real Da Vinci.

[@0n3faith1day]

If it dates back to leonardo's time, then it is his work definitely... no one else can draw such mysterious gaze, and smile, and eyes but him..

[@GnaReffotsirk]

It looks like the Jesus in the last supper

[@bobsaget7832]

Making a question to make a book

[@bobnolin9155]

"Salavtor Mundi" paintings were workshop pieces during this time. So were Madonna and Childs. Leonardo never painted a "workshop" image in his life. He reinvented painting. MBS paid $400M for a work by the school of Leonardo.

[@aripinaja4568]

Is salvator mundi painted more than one by leonardo?

[@harshitverma6330]

Should I Convert this painting into a audio file?

[@ms-fk6eb]

and then sell it as an NFT! 🤢

[@cleopatra2875]

The ultraviolet thing is beautiful...his right hand is complete.

[@mukulkhatwani3247]

For me the greatest painting is Whistler's mother!

[@Scherzo7]

Mukul Khatwani it’s a poster though 😂😂

[@henrylivingstone2800]

Scherzo7 😂😂😂

[@steviejd5803]

Is that the Mr Bean version?

[@PrithuDeb]

Is this the biggest art scam ever?

[@johndoe-lw1xo]

I wouldn’t waste my time to go see it wherever they hang it. It’s a not a real Leonardo. The buyer got scammed.

[@harlen07]

A painting by Dianne Modestini now

[@GG55-L]

“ the Louvre in Paris is hoping to have the painting “ In fact no , they don’t want to include it because they don’t think it is real.

[@killjoy2467]

People spend their whole lives to be able say and try to understand, explain the meaning and go into detail trying to figure out what these famous paintings mean, yet I think these famous artist were just cracked out and liked to paint a lot and I bet Leo was just like. “Imma paint da Jesus n sip my wine” and he’d laugh if he knew someone payed that much

[@henrylivingstone2800]

But Leonardo was paid to paint his portraits ?

[@oasispeace8364]

Ben Simmons

[@moleahy6880]

There is no hard evidence (provenance, original documentation such as a bill of sale) that proves this was done by Leonardo or even by his studio. 80-90% of the painting (including the entire face which is the most important area in a portrait painting) was repainted less than 20 years ago. If it was ever even touched by Leonardo, it is now a contemporary painting. Given the huge sums of money at stake, all of the vested interests had an incentive to declare this a Leonardo. But a lot of experts disagree. There is no consensus.

[@debramoss2267]

I can't help thinking this person looks very similar to the person in the Mona Lisa. I see it's beauty. Ironically, if the Bible has it right, Jesus would ask why the money was not used for widows, needy and the vulnerable. World still needs saving.

[@gees6716]

I think the glass ball in "Jesus's" hand should show a different image of the cloth behind it. Some kind of an magnifying glass effect. Shouldn't it ? And shouldn't Leonardo have known better ? GEE S

[@henrylivingstone2800]

Not necessarily the warping due to magnification would only be noticeable if the ball is being held far enough for the magnification to take place, if the ball is pressed up to his torso then the magnification would be reserved only to the outer edges of the orb.

[@jennyyy2813]

They should not have sold it 1. For that much and 2. To a single person. If it they valued it so much, they should have loaned or sold it to a museum

[@aripinaja4568]

Saya juga punya lukisan ini, leonardo buat berapa buah sih ?atau cuma 1...

[@Lanzottv]

Time is money.

[@usernamemaybe]

400.000M? Jeeeesus

[@SakibAhmed-wc1eg]

Come on... It's price is based on the mystery... The price is justified as we are talking nonstop on it’s authenticity. Monalisa was just another piece of art before it was stolen by an Italian. It became a masterpiece after 1911. That doesn’t mean it’s the best art ever. The value of an artwork is mostly based on the fame of the painter and the intrigue it could create among public, which Salvador Mundi did, does and will do. I see a potential in it of even surpassing the fame of Monalisa.

[@KHobbies_cina]

I hope the restorer was paid a well sum of money for what she did.

[@Haures89]

Simon says.

[@shpdonas]

Buy painting from living artist. They need money

[@2019-q4j]

they only restored it

[@joegug4751]

You can only make that kind of money in the art world. I bought a James Rizzi for 3.99 at a thrift store, value 4000.00 that’s a good day.

[@qwertyzxcv123]

The reporter is a work of art herself.

[@JVAN4L]

L rizz