Is the Bible True? | Full Talk

[@cheanlamazing]

Billy carson recommended me this channel.

[@javperalta6964]

Who’s here after the Billy Carson debate?

[@mujunialbert84]

Here I am

[@joshua9449]

🙋‍♂️

[@WillDelivered]

Yup!

[@lesegoshawn2134]

🤣🤣🤣🤣bruuuh

[@seanedwards550]

I've been all over this material since. Particularly started on the Christmas origin video

[@RapunzelASMR]

Billy Carson sent me here XD

[@daveh3581]

I could listen to Wes talk about God all day

[@projectmoodswing]

You must be having a laugh lol

[@daveh3581]

@projectmoodswing The word, the life, the truth isn't something I laugh at.

[@jebriltau9138]

Hallelujah Glory Thank you 🙏 Lord Jesus Christ ❤❤❤ Emmanuel ❤❤❤

[@frostyf27]

Amen! God Bless you!!! ✝️☦🙏

[@NoJesus.NoLife]

Heaven must be smiling at you Wes. Your infographics are amazing. You are a great blessing to the Body. Thank you so much!

[@andreastumewu2830]

God always rises a man for a season. You're born for such a time as this Mr. Wess Huff. Eternal praise be unto our God 🙌⚡️🔥.

[@maxmaximum-sh4bx]

Wesley Buff is Back! 💪🤠

[@Geletin911]

looks like he's on a cycle

[@user-md7uc5tx6b]

@@Geletin911No he doesn't. It's always funny when people drop the steroid "argument" for when people have nice bodies. Claiming "steroids" is a copout for the lazy.

[@Dickens76]

😂

[@firemission1477]

@@maxmaximum-sh4bx he is going to get humbled soon enough😎

[@gordonshumway6821]

Never heard about Wes Huff or Billy Carson but after the debate went viral through various other KZbin channels, I thank God for introducing me with such a knowledgeable man like Wes Huff. I'm bing watching one video after another. Sooo many good videos, with spot on references. ❤

[@kristag7208]

Great video and your website is extensive. Thank you Wes 🙂

[@AaronStephens-l2g]

How proud your parents must be❤

[@zachhecita]

Really like the new graphics! Clear use of design principles. Great work!

[@Nadiahope7]

Love all that you put in to these teachings. This is the number 1 thing I hear against our faith and even those questioning theirs. "The bibles been changed" I link them straight to you! 🙌🏼✝️

[@ChildofGod98765]

Amen. Only God knows the burdens we face. I’m a single mom and it can be hard to have everything on my shoulders. Especially because both of my sons are special needs but despite the challenges I face. I keep faith in Jesus even as I struggle to pay rent and as I struggle to buy groceries for my children. As a christian that’s all I can do. Praise God and thank him because he will provide a blessing is always on the way in Jesus name.

[@Nadiahope7]

I'm a single mum too so I really hear you. But God, he has made a way for me.

[@DeaconBeanCooter]

Why are you women having children with these men?

[@4jgarner]

​@@DeaconBeanCooteryou have no idea how they ended up in that situation and it's none of your business.

[@DeaconBeanCooter]

@@4jgarner judge righteously is what Christians are called to do. You fail

[@DeaconBeanCooter]

@@4jgarner wide open legs is how and everyone knows it. Way to go endorsing 4horedoms.... How very *Xtian* of you. Lol

[@June4Marcus]

The Lord knows how to talk to me. I believe in God and pray , talk daily with Him but I’ve always been on the fence about the Bible. I’m a very logical guy and need to follow the steps of how we get somewhere. This video was definitely made for someone like me. Well done!

[@Dickens76]

Very nice to see all the good things to come out of that absolute obliteration of a modern day false prophet in a debate. Good things. God bless you Wes.

[@frostyf27]

Thank Lord i found your channel ✝️☦🙏

[@kalkat02]

I’m doing a brush over of this video and am already finding it fascinating- can’t wait to watch it another ten times to hammer it home 😂

[@Bandy1036]

Who else thinks it's obvious God used Billy Carson to lift Wes' ministry? You're blessed, Wes.

[@Yesica1993]

Yes! I LOVE it when He does that!

[@ACuriousChild]

There is ONLY ONE AUTHOR of THE WORD OF YHVH - YHVH HIMSELF - through whomever YHVH ENABLED to be trustworthy to SERVE YHVH'S WISDOM MIGHT GRACE AND PURPOSE. SOLI DEO GLORIA!

[@BOSS7871]

Wes huff is the man

[@carlafoss9248]

So much fantastic information!

[@micxploed]

This is amazing!

[@InnerLuminosity]

No it's not

[@dollasignmic18344]

As we put God’s teachings into practice it increases are understanding to the Truth.

[@jasondthompson]

I like this guy and Douglas Jacoby 👍🙏

[@jamesg239]

Great talk

[@angelocarrion3399]

Fantastic video. Eloquently describes the historical evidence of the Bible.

[@jesusmadrid9049]

Billy Carson needs to take your seminar/Lectures :)

[@HopeOfChrist]

😂

[@Gen_4927]

Excellent!

[@maxmaximum-sh4bx]

Let's Go!

[@anthony-kelly]

Wes Huff? More like, Wes Buff! 💪✝️🕊

[@maxmaximum-sh4bx]

Great video!

[@NicholasZak]

Now Wes…..he’s True and speaks Truth, unlike ….cough Cough…..certain people in this world

[@clifflodriguss122]

Dang Wes is jacked.

[@Joshua52391]

You like it like that?😊

[@turtlevillanueva118]

Holy spirit working through Wes (and ironically through billy carson) in leading some of us here

[@bboynewsboy991]

Im going to listen to you untill i believe the bible and have faith in jesus. Im done playing around. If theres a God, i must know. Death is a breath away and my evilness is going to ruin my eternal experience. I only know one real Christian in my life, although my whole family thinks theyre saved, i have him pray for me because i know God can hear him. Please pray for me if you really know God. We must plead to God to save my soul. Is that hiw it works? I dont know. Is my salvation actually solely in my hands? I DONT KNOW..

[@Chaos.at.the.cails.]

Yes my friend. Your salvation is in your hands. All you have to do is go to God, profess your sins, ask for forgives, and ask Jesus to come into your heart and love him with your whole heart. But that's the thing, you have to mean it! Doing that will not make you perfect, you will still be a sinful human as it were. But by inviting Jesus into your heart and recognizing him as your savior, your sins are forgiven. The first commandment is love. Love your God and love your neighbor. People have unfortunately stopped carrying about people these days smh. I will pray for you. And I hope you come to Christ my friend.

[@valeriebanks-oneal5976]

I Pray you can hear your God Spirit🙌🏾 we learn our God Spirit by learning the character of Jesus Christ 😍 God Bless you 🙏🏾💪🏾🙏🏾✌🏾🙏🏾🫶🏾

[@MrMendeezy]

Continue seeking truth with an open mind. Maybe read through Proverbs to see wisdom. Check out Psalms. Humble yourself and realize how flawed we all are and seek His help. I'm not sure if I believe there is a moment where we are suddenly transformed, but rather that it is a journey. I only casually believed until a few years ago, having never read the Bible. Suddenly I had an interest to learn more. This year I finally read the Bible cover to cover. It's absolutely amazing. Another book I would highly recommend that helped me was "Is God A Moral Monster" by Copan...it's easy to get tripped up on Old Testament vs New Testament....most people already love New Testament in my experience, so that doesn't seem like a common obstacle.

[@jamesortiz7443]

Faith comes by hearing and hearing the Word of God Romans 10:17

[@ACuriousChild]

It's SOLELY IN YOUR HEART!

[@chrish42085]

What bible would you recommend nkjv csb niv esv nlt... im really appreciate you and your knowledge point me in the right direction 😌

[@EIij4h]

In other interviews Wes has recommended the NET (free on the Bible app). This translation has extensive footnotes.

[@chrish42085]

@EIij4h thanks

[@P.H.888]

Rev 3 v 20 🚪❤️‍🔥 Download The Author! 🧬🕊️

[@chrish42085]

@P.H.888 love that

[@r-e-s-o-n-a-n-t]

Some parts may be historically accurate, but many supernatural claims are made that we cannot confirm as true.

[@P.H.888]

Reason reckoning discernment Testimony from eyewitnesses Personal experience What is The Bible theme? Mankind sin’s and so dies A mere temporal existence We need to get up to Heaven Spiritual and Eternal and perfect unity We Need The God given Saviour The Resurrection 🕊️ His Ascension! 500 eyewitness The baptism in The Same Holy Spirit! Billions have experienced this awesome event! Personally Jesus is The Word HE is LORD RECEIVE HIM AS SAVIOUR 🙏🏻

[@gazedo05]

This guy would Be a barrel of laughs at a party!

[@AaronStephens-l2g]

He's likely gained more true friends in a week than you will if you live to be 120 if you don't repent. There's a Party He's most likely gonna be attending that DEFINES what a Party is FOREVER. I pray we see you there ❤

[@4jgarner]

0:31 Is there a copy of this image available on Spanish?

[@vejeke]

Hay dos grandes fallas en ese gráfico. Cuando dice "reliable" y "trustworthy". Te recomiendo que consultes otras fuentes de información para tener una imagen completa.

[@4jgarner]

@@vejeke ¿que tiene de desconfiable? Si se puede preguntar.

[@vejeke]

@@4jgarner Son textos religiosos escritos por miembros de dicha religión, en los cuales se entremezclan mitos y leyendas con hechos históricos. Su principal cometido no era narrar lo que realmente sucedió, sino difundir la fe que ellos habían recibido. Por ejemplo, fíjate cómo empieza el evangelio el autor anónimo del texto que Ireneo de Lyon atribuyó a Lucas en la segunda mitad del segundo siglo. El autor dice que lo que te cuenta es lo que otros le han contado, pero lo que no dice es que en realidad plagió lo que otro autor había escrito antes que él. Cambiando a su gusto aquello que le interesaba. Hay un vídeo justamente sobre esto que seguramente te gustará ver. Se titula The Gospel of Luke - The Alternative Facts gospel.

[@4jgarner]

@@vejeke lo veré más tarde. Pero también estoy muy interesado en como sabes con certeza que plagió otras historias, cambiando la narración a su gusto?

[@vejeke]

​@@4jgarner Del mismo modo por el que sabemos cuándo un alumno copia a otro. Si en dos textos de autores diferentes hay una frase concreta que contiene varias palabras inusuales, es muy probable que uno sea una copia del otro. Si la coincidencia de la frase es exacta, las probabilidades se disparan; y si, en lugar de una frase, son párrafos enteros idénticos palabra por palabra, entonces ya no cabe duda alguna. Eso es precisamente lo que tenemos entre su trabajo y el texto de un autor diferente que sabemos que fue escrito con anterioridad. Respecto a los cambios, te los explicaría, pero te aseguro que es mucho más divertido ver el vídeo. Son menos de quince minutos.

[@sammcrae8892]

Carson got skunked. He should have just stayed home and watched a movie. 😮 🙏✝️👑✝️🙏

[@projectmoodswing]

Billy Carson for president

[@josecontreras1003]

Logic like his created justification for Race Science… y’all can keep Billy and Wes

[@timwalter6548]

In tried to listen to this but kept thinking...what does Wes do to get those biceps?

[@levicalebleon4321]

Codex curls

[@PrestonBHD]

Bro is jacked

[@maxmaximum-sh4bx]

🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@hombrepobre9646]

we can see how useful are atheists like billy carson, I found this channel because of him

[@qwerty-so6ml]

#### One Gospel: Gospel (GOOD ANGEL) of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.

[@aYoutuberWhomJesusLoves]

@@qwerty-so6ml Can I ask you a question, what do you think happens to us after we die?

[@qwerty-so6ml]

@@aKZbinrWhomJesusLoves If you are converted, enter into kingdom of heaven. Matthew 18:3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. If not converted, your agreement with death is not annulled, and death's sting conquers you.

[@aYoutuberWhomJesusLoves]

@@qwerty-so6ml Thank you for your response, I'm just trying to understand your perspective a bit, I hope you are open to that. You believe we are all fallen angels? Also, if you do a quick google search Gospel means good news my friend. Last thing I wanted to get some understanding on, being converted means converted to a follower of Jesus Christ, or is your understanding of this different?

[@qwerty-so6ml]

@@aKZbinrWhomJesusLoves Luke 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to (G2097 EUANGELOS) preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, G2097 EU ANGELOS = good angel. Good news would be EU LOGOS.

[@qwerty-so6ml]

@@aKZbinrWhomJesusLoves Jesus called you a god/angel. John 10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? What law? Psalm 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods (H430); and all of you are children of the most High. 7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes. Strongs H430 Elohim = angels, gods (little g). Right there, he called you a god (angel) that shall die like man, and fall. A fallen angel. Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. No mention of unrepentant man in Matthew 25:41. Matthew 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

[@ReluctantApostate]

Couple comments: So he makes a point to say the bible [that he prefers] is not one book but actually 66 different books, only to seemingly ignore it later when ascribing truth. He goes on to make a fundamental compositional error that because some books in the bible have some accurate historical references (never mentioning the areas where there are historical errors or problems to question that narrative), that we can trust the rest is equally true. By what reasons can we know that this book of "66" books by numerous authors can operate as a single unit, especially after you've just reminded us to think of it as individual units? Using names is a great way to provide contextual information for when and where an account was written but demonstrates nothing for the voracity of the actual account detailed. You may identify that I wrote a story in the early 90s, but it is another thing to use that to infer or validate, even if sincerely written, that it the details of the story are true or accurate, and not mistaken. I also disagree that it means the stories we have are from eye-witnesses. I believe the biblical accounts have kernels of truth, and some original accounts may have happened, but it is a large leap to connect the truth of the original event (whenever it happened and if it was told by an eye-witness) with the story passed down to what we hold now. Without an ACTUAL original account to compare we have no way of knowing what changes may or may not have occurred in between. The Torah is a great example of how layers of additions, redactions and compositions of related stories by numerous authors can happen (check out current views on the Documentary Hypothesis if you want to know more). And i'd agree that some pieces of manuscripts we have for the NT texts are very close to the originals compared to other historical documents, but that doesn't erase the decades or centuries that occur between, never mind that the earliest ones are mere fragments. I think less than 100 from the first 2 or 3 centuries. Just because something is copied well now, doesn't mean it's always been the case. Textual variants show that changes have been made. And you can feel comforted in thinking the core doctrines aren't affected, but the truth is, if an early change was made and carried on through copies, we won't know until we have the original or a variants to demonstrate it. Rebuilding history is a unfortunately a bit of a fool's game because it's crippled by everything we don't know and can't see. It's a best guess analysis of the past, until new data may be excavated to adjust our thinking. - just the thoughts from a reluctant apostate who sought to validate the bible as God's word, to know him better and correct his liberal ways, only to be disappointed by the reason and evidence to believe the bible as true, apart from a leap of blind faith.

[@qwerty-so6ml]

One Gospel: Gospel (GOOD ANGEL) of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.

[@jamesortiz7443]

Get out of here Billy Carson we know it's you.

[@ReluctantApostate]

@@jamesortiz7443 before yesterday I didn't even know who that was. Plus i posted that comment 7 months ago shortly after the videos were released. My suggestion if you think what I'm saying seems as preposterous as Billy Carson's perspective is to go read some critical scholarship to get some greater perspective. Don't just surround yourself with apologists. . You can even find more and more critical scholars sharing their work and consensus views even on KZbin: Dr James D. Tabor Dr Kipp Davis Dr Dale C Alison Dr Dan McClellan Dr John Dominic Crossan Dr Joshua Bowen Dr Francesca Stavrakopoulou Dr Candida Moss Dr Paula Frederickson Dr Robyn Faith Walsh Dr Elaine Pagels

[@ColorsFlight]

@WesHuff i named my little boy Philo after a Alexandian Jew from the 1st century. Wild hun. I really like word names so I was looking at greek presufixes and stumbled into the name Philo lol.

[@brendanbongiovanni6394]

You need to talk to Mauro Biglino Now that would be interesting.

[@Timotheos-td7mq]

One charlatan down 👎 Paul wallis next?🤔

[@tookie36]

73*

[@rtoguidver3651]

There's only one way to know the Bible is true: . Romans 8:7 “The carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” . John 3:6,7 “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is Spirit.” “Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.” . Acts 2:38. “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” . 1 John 2:27 “But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.”

[@Shlomayo]

73* books

[@cornbreadpassion11]

He's still picking and choosing different parts of the bible that includes pieces of history. But no real historical, literal stories of history. If he's acknowledging the bible as a perfect book or as a historical document, he's already in the wrong. This is my first time watching his video after I've heard so much about him. Just saying someone/some place that actually exists in history doesn't make the bible historically reliable. Even with the NT, the translation from Greek to what we currently have, the use of semi-colon and breaks in the wording is deceiving. You can sense they have some classical literature influence. I don't think he's taking into account the way stories were told in the time period it's in. It resembles stories from Greco-Roman literature.

[@firemission1477]

The most simple and conclusive answer : No.

[@Yesica1993]

When did you read the full Bible and examine its claims to determine whether they were true or false?

[@P.H.888]

@@Yesica1993you can dismiss a rebel. He is a unbeliever.

[@P.H.888]

You are totally wrong.

[@Yesica1993]

@@P.H.888 I don't allow people to get away with their games. They need to BACK UP what they say. Otherwise, other people see it and are influenced.

[@firemission1477]

@@Yesica1993 In reality can snakes and donkeys talk? If your answer is correctly ‘no’ - it clearly and conclusively answers the question: “Is the bible true?” Evidently not.

[@vejeke]

He refers to Luke as if he were the author of the Gospel of Luke. Ask yourself. Does the author claim to be Luke at any point in the text? When is the first actual evidence of a person referring by that name to that anonymous text? Before that happened, were there more people quoting that text? How many? That's quite a few, don't you think? What names did they use to refer to the author? Isn't that curious? In what was possibly the first Christian bible to be produced, that of Marcion of Sinope, whose complete list of books dates from around 140 as opposed to the 367 of the New Testament we know now, was a version of that gospel used? what title did it have? That gospel, as well as the rest of the gospels in the New Testament are totally anonymous texts and most biblical scholars will tell you, with very good arguments based on evidence rather than tradition, that they were not written by eyewitnesses of the life of Jesus.

[@jensvoiceforyou7581]

Would you kindly provide the scholars names and where they were written? While it appears you have some information and knowledge, it’s imperative to not use fallacies, like the appeal to authority, as an argument especially when you don’t reference them specifically.

[@vejeke]

​@@jensvoiceforyou7581 Sure, no problem. Dr. Mitchell Reddish, Dr. Elaine Pagels, Dr. Dale Allison, Dr. John Dominic Crossan, Dr. Mark Goodacre, etc. They usually publish in academic journals (with the exception of the occasional book), such as NTS, JBL, JSNT, etc. I fully agree that one should not make use of fallacies such as appealing to authority or tradition. That is why I pose the questions.

[@marthaj67]

"That gospel, as well as the rest of the gospels in the New Testament are totally anonymous texts and most biblical scholars will tell you, with very good arguments based on evidence rather than tradition, that they were not written by eyewitnesses of the life of Jesus." This is just NOT true. The biblical writers WERE INDEED eyewitnesses of the life of Jesus. You are on a dangerous path here. It's fine to ask questions, but some of the so-called "experts" to whom you're turning to for answers are questionable at best. _This is what we proclaim to you: what was from the beginning, _*_what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and our hands have touched (concerning the word of life-and the life was revealed, and we have seen and testify and announce to you_*_ the eternal life that was with the Father and was revealed to us). _*_What we have seen and heard we announce to you too,_*_ so that you may have fellowship with us (and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ). Thus we are writing these things so that our joy may be complete."_ 1 John 1:1-4 (NET)

[@brandalfthegrand]

Most scholars agree that Marcion's gospel was a revised version of the Gospel of Luke. The idea that his gospel is the first Christian bible is absolutely not the prominent belief among scholars, this is a particular view that some current anti-christian scholars. The idea that most biblical scholars would tell you that the New Testament gospels are "totally anonymous" is also absurd, this is not the prominent view even among secular scholars. The titles given to these gospels are based on the first line of the manuscript which begin with "the gospel of Jesus according to Mark/Matthew/Luke/John" so the authorship is clearly stated in the very first line. Also, the textual criticism of the historicity of the canonical gospels (Matthew/Mark/Luke) is very strong. The prominent view among scholars is that the canonical Gospels were the primary texts with Mark's more than likely being the first written and distributed among a Jewish audience and then Matthew and Luke written after, borrowing some excerpts from Mark verbatim. The New Testament as a canon wasn't officially put together until 367 but that was only in response to Gnostic and other religious cults claiming divine authority and inserting their own books. In 325 the council of Nicaea was put together to make the already culturally understood Christian texts to an "official canon". Though there was no official canon before then, the canonical gospels, the writings of Paul and the book of Acts and Revelation were widely read and assumed as canon. The "official New Testament" was only put together out of necessity due to bad actors using the Christian religious growth to their own advantage. The history on this is quite clear and the early church fathers addressed it directly. Tertullian (3rd century) and Epiphanius (4th and 5th century) both address the Marcionite beliefs including his gospel and canonization (though they may not use that word, they address his "works" and beliefs). The gospel of Marcion was understood as being wrong (non-canonical) before a canon was established. This is not new, nor is it a discovery. It's yet another gnostic text rising up from history and being exploited by scholars and taken out of context by would-be scholars. There is nothing new under the sun.

[@gabepettinicchio7454]

@@brandalfthegrand The Old Testament (the Greek Septuagint) and the New Testament were officially canonized at the Council of Rome in 382 AD. The Council was orchestrated and led by Pope Damasus I. It also included 400+ Catholic bishops, along with a few priests and theologians, including St. Augustine and St. Jerome. In 367 AD, Saint Athanasius, the Bishop of Alexandria, wrote a Festal Letter, w/the 1st mention of the New Testament books that would match the 27 books recognized & canonized by the same Catholic Church, in 382AD. All were pronounced "divinely inspired" and suitable for the Liturgy of the Mass. That is still the case today. What benefit is it to anyone stating a false, or at best an invincibly ignorant history of the Bible? Your only "rule of faith" then becomes your "authentic" inconveniant truth.

[@prophettruth1923]

Go go go Billy, Mr Huff cannot explain where the ancient tribes got their astronomical knowledge?

[@jamesortiz7443]

Falling angels, that's easy. Goodbye 👋

[@Enscriptiv]

Short answer, no. Long answer, nope.