Is the Big Bang Theory Broken?

[@nicholashylton6857]

Those AI "science channels" are soooo annoying! They ramble on about this or that & pull viewers away from excellent channels like this.

[@BLD426]

Big time. They should be banned. They just junk up the place.

[@dcquence]

They are very often giving bad information and click-bait crap too.

[@roryb5512]

💯

[@autumnleaves7907]

​@@dcquenceironic, given how much he complains about science journalism. Yet he is promoting an a.i. video app that will help contribute to that misinformation

[@TinaBornemannn]

Exactly. Paul puts life to it.

[@ARWest-bp4yb]

If your cosmology has been broken please check your warranty and call customer service to schedule for repair or replacement.

[@stuartdryer1352]

Or call a local quantum mechanic. It may just need a slight adjustment to its wave function. Of, course if it's collapsed all bets are off.

[@bizpo2713]

Thank you Paul! The “interesting” thing to me is that a preponderance of the stuff we see (dark matter and energy) is not predicted by theory and not understood. This means it’s “possible” we are missing something fundamental. I agree we don’t want to be to quick to throw out our theories but let’s face it - dark stuff is humbling - the failure of Supersymmetry was humbling - but the beauty of science is that it’s mandatory that we admit we are dead wrong when the evidence compels. Thanks again.

[@murraybartley4467]

Stock videos make the most convincing scientific arguments.

[@daMillenialTrucker]

As long as it's not made by ai cosmology channels, which you can tell by the voice narration off the rip.

[@murraybartley4467]

@daMillenialTrucker (i was being needlessly sarcastic, and perhaps a little unfair), but i thoroughly agree on the ai narrations, they are terrible.

[@RUNOV.A]

Hello. So interesting man! Thanks 🎉

[@JohnMcGuire-y4b]

Finally, a voice of reason to place JWST findings in context, to counteract all of the AI narrated sensationalist bollocks on here. Thank you❤

[@EL_DUDERIN0]

Another great video, you're an awesome science explainer dude, Paul!

[@everybodywazzup]

Great video, I will be subscribing to this channel. I agree with other commenters, there is so much garbage out there that pretends to be scientific. Finding genuinely rigorous content such as yours is a breath of fresh air!

[@babyface2k]

I like how your videos go because there’s a feeling of Podcast to it, not sounding scripted even if we don’t see you talking. 🧐

[@peterjones958]

Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with us.

[@chrissscottt]

Cool vid. I prefer the term "mistaken" to "stupid" though.

[@timothygolden5321]

Either the redshifts are 'nailed down' or they are not. You have claimed both at your own convenience. That or I misunderstand your discussion. How you get an uncertainty as you have claimed based on spectroscopic footprints does not seem realistic. I guess the real problem is the cosmological geometry, which you've somewhat avoided in the discussion for simplicity. Sure would be nice to cut inflation out. Sure would be nice to find simplicity along the way. Polysign numbers yield emergent spacetime: Consider a three-signed number system. Whereas the familiar two-signed system states that -x+x=0 the three-signed system will by symmetry require: -x+x*x=0 where '*' is clearly a new third sign, and this explicit P3 reuses the symbols of P2, but each is its own domain, so that we must explicitly state which we are in unless of course we are working in Pn, and these systems do generalize this way. P1, P2, P3, P4, and so on exist and arithmetic products based on the modulo behavior of the signatures are readily available, retaining familiar algebraic concepts in Pn. Yes, there are peculiarities, such as the zero dimensional nature of P1, but each requires its own geometry, with P3 forming the plane already through the initial law of balance. That no Cartesian product is necessary to generate general dimensional space ought to cause your jaw to drop. That P3 are already the complex numbers, though they are in a new suit of clothes whose laws exactly match your supposedly fundamental P2, which is only just proven non-fundamental, ought to have you dropping what, your pants too? The simplex coordinate system and the signon lead the way now. Emergent spacetime is available through this new geometric algebra, and how the human race has overlooked this option for so long; for so many greats to neglect this; this then suggests a shortcoming of the human mind. That we are merely an early instance of symbol crunching animal is a fairly plausible declaration. That our language may not be fully evolved and that we exist in an accumulation of detail that we all mimic ad nauseum to become straight A's; these posits are fairly strong in hindsight of polysign. You can find the geometry yourself. You can find the product. The rewrite of the modern accumulation in the polysign context is undone. The existence of polysign exposes that just one or two other overlooked frameworks which the human has habitually inhibited from existence are again plausible. Polysign is but a step along the way; one which you likely will fail to explore. Still, if you take the challenge and you make it through you may find my statements here sensible.

[@santyclause8034]

Is space the external hole of matter or the interior body of mass? How can Space be empty, its full of stars and stuff.

[@irrefudiate]

Not a scientist and I have no math skills whatsoever, but I find the trials and tribulations of cutting-edge science to be worthwhile and interesting to watch. I have pet peeves with loosey-goosey word definitions, though... "space, fabric of space, singularity, existence, non-existence" are a few words and phrases that, to me, need to be defined.

[@spencerholmes7602]

Truly excellent, Paul. Another ‘Big Banger’ 😊

[@SplashOfOrange]

34:14 -- "And I hope those surprises are interesting." But... but ... that would mean they're probably wrong! 🤔😄

[@billmerrell2797]

What I can't get a handle on is that before the big bang, where did all the matter come from that is squished into a point that banged in the first place?

[@malcolmlane1489]

a great talk by an interesting guy

[@JKDVIPER]

I think so. I think mass is why the universe expands. We see it more when primordial holes join 💥but, that displacement is expanding the universe at different rates and collapsing at different rates depending on the density of the object, I believe. Just like a rock under water traveling would displace the liquid around the rock, so goes with space itself. Room. Volume. The potential for motion. An absence of mass. Earth is quite sponge like, yet a black hole is packed to the brim, molecular motion stops, time is almost gone, just like you freeze a steak to keep it longer. With those kinds of flying absolute zero temperature masses under tremendous compression, they act like a pipe outside and inside. Inside subcooling, outside superheat. In HVAC we learn that you can manipulate pressure in order to draw heat from a cooler area, and compress it enough to make it escape into a hotter area, as you know heat flows from a higher temperature to a lower, but not absolutely. Because what if you need to take a little bit of heat out of a small object like a house, and add it to a bigger/hotter more dense gas outside under atmospheric pressures, we can superheat Freon and subcool it as a gas, so that got me thinking, dark matter might be energy in the form of storm force. Attraction.

[@donbrunton5700]

In a more compact, early universe, it's not surprising that star, galaxy, and black hole formation would be excelarated. The shock waves from the expansion epoch might have caused baryonic matter to jump the stellar phase and collapse into black holes.

[@chadbarnard3620]

Toddler galaxies have to be the most chaotic...

[@daMillenialTrucker]

Or God is real.

[@davemi00]

Hello As a fellow sutter I had to Sub.

[@rachelwren-vipond6029]

But does this allow for Fred Hoyle 's theory of a steady state universe. But with bubbles? 😊

[@themig292003]

Can we get a video on Alfven’s Ambiplasma Hypothesis, (made 50 years ago) and the discovery of anti-helium by the AMS on board ISS.

[@nicknac1980]

A man's gotta do, what a man's gotta do... im just happy there are humans with his intelligence and guile still making honest videos... no shame, he has to eat people! Or you could be a patrion, if you don't like the advertising....

[@raifsevrence]

He has to eat people ? Why does he have to eat people ? Hmmm... Maybe he ate that comma ? Jokes aside, guile is not a trait I find desirable in an educator or journalist. At least not when interacting with an audience. Save the guile for office politics or source/resource interaction.

[@TurdFerguson456]

Science Journalism may be bad, but mainstream journalism is just pathetic and morally wrong. Especially political, especially about Trump! Love your channel Paul!

[@russellneitzke4972]

Does gravity need particles? Can dark matter be damaged, broken, bent space without any particles?

[@DaFinkingOrk]

Do we have tunnel vision about assigning everything to particles (because quantum theories work very well). If gravity is the curvature of space then how can that be caused by particles anyway? Curving space surely is just curved space, not transmitted by some graviton particle?

[@biggstravels1851]

@@DaFinkingOrkso what exactly is “curved space”? Does it have mass?

[@kuukeli]

interesting video

[@stevedrake6529]

Is there a music free version of this video??

[@autumnleaves7907]

An a.i. video free version would be nice too

[@FrankMerton]

Yes, missed you. I have seen science, and, indeed, all human knowledge, compared to a huge edifice constantly being enlarged, where from time to time some part has to be renovated or altered, but the edifice remains.

[@JungleJargon]

A deeper understanding of gravity gives you a deeper understanding of the universe. The earth is flat locally the same as the speed of light is the same locally but not on a larger scale. The earth is round on larger scales and the speed of light depends on the measures of time and distance which change depending on the amount of gravity in the surrounding area. This means that distant starlight arrives instantaneously from distant galaxies which aren’t as far away as they appear to us to be with our measures of time and distance and the time is also passing by at a much faster rate since there’s no matter between us and distant galaxies to slow down time or shorten distance according to general relativity which is now an observation and not just a theory. …and the converse of things approaching a black hole look stopped to us because of how slow they are moving. So causation is faster outside of a galaxy and things happen slower inside of a galaxy. The changes in time and distance compound the changes in the speed of light as observed from our frame of reference. The measured speed can’t change. When time and distance used to measure the speed change the actual speed changes. Do the following thought experiment. Hold your hands a foot apart representing 186,000 miles saying “one thousand and one” representing one second while pretending to see an imaginary photon going from one hand to the other. Now expand the distance between your hands saying “one thousand and one” as fast as you can. You should notice that the speed of the imaginary photon increases the more distance expands and the more time speeds up just same as the farther away from the center of the galaxy it is. The opposite is also true. Someone moving in the direction of a black hole will seem to us to be stopped. *If you change the size of a cubit you will change the size of the house that you build with it.*

[@slartibartfast7921]

Not being invited to specific parties is often the surest indicator of integrity. Not just within science….. hint hint.

[@germanschaad2117]

Sutter from Switzerland ? ❤5D

[@jerrybowen2869]

Great video! The JWST has exposed the futility of trying to "know" everything. I'm more interested in a better understanding of the natural forces within our solar system than hearing someone guess about a big bang. For instance, our Newtonian equations for motion use a mysterious constant "g". Maybe we should be measuring actual forces such as resultant magnetic forces. Personally I believe the open minded "electric universe - plasma cosmology theory" is the correct starting place. We know these forces exist, we know the intermolecular force of attraction is real, someone should quantify these forces within a giant magnetic field. Has this happened?

[@benwood655]

The gases and stuff definitely could have been working danced at the beginning of the universe therefore making more and brighter stars

[@edcunion]

The Subaru telescope has found about 100+ old quasars on the periphery of the visible universal spheroid out toward the CMB, that were active in the early universe? What's the chance if JWST looks back further and finds the oldest galaxies/black holes merge toward one old gamma ray quasar or a group of regularly spaced and aged ones? Those were the gamma-ray laser sites that created a stable Wheeler geon that we occupy today?! Must be quite a large lab in the 5th dimension and not tachyons?! Let the Sun shine in! It would be neat to subtract the shorter wavelength less redshifted galaxies from the longest wavelength most redshifted galaxies once JWST has finished mapping its deepest field resolution limit, to see the pattern of those oldest galaxies, when our universe was at its youngest as per that JWST resolution limit!

[@chrismcmullen4313]

There was some number of previous attempts. That guy was screwing it up and was fired. Some part of that effort is still there.

[@JungleJargon]

I’ll give you something interesting. When are scientists going to figure out that the changes in the measures of time and distance due to the amount of gravity in the vicinity change the speed of light relative to our measures of time and distance where we are inside of a galaxy? Scientists can’t seem to figure out that where gravity changes time and distance it changes the speed of light and the rate of causation. Space is not flat in the measures of time and distance on larger scales just like the Earth is not flat on larger scales. Light MUST indeed *always* travel 186,000 miles per second at the speed of light C. When distance is stretched from having less gravity, light must still complete traveling that distance in the time determined by C. That means the light is traveling faster as perceived by us in a more contracted frame of reference where there is more gravity. Add to that the fact that a second passes by faster away from the center of mass which increases the speed light MUST travel even more. It’s really not complicated. It’s so simple. It’s the very reason things appear to be moving faster than the speed of light moving away from the center of the galaxy because they are moving faster away from the center of the galaxy yet without exceeding the speed of light. I don’t know why that is so hard to understand. Don’t even try to put an age on the universe when time itself is a creation. There are three rates to consider. 1. The diminishing effect or draw of gravity away from the center of mass. 2. The increasing rate of time away from the center of mass. 3. The increasing measure of distance away from the center of mass. Speed is measured by time and distance which both change and that changes the speed of light and causation. Things happen faster. Distance gets longer without gravity and time goes by faster, both of which combine to speed up causation. The light has to arrive at a farther distance faster when distance is stretched *and* time also goes by faster. *Then* there is the first thing to consider and that is the diminishing draw of gravity the farther away it is from the center of the galaxy which means things eventually slow down the farther away they are from the center mass of a galaxy. (It's not complicated. No dark matter is needed.) 😎 Redshift happens when light leaves a galaxy. Blueshift happens as light enters a galaxy. All things being equal, the light will be redshifted as it leaves a galaxy and then blueshifted back again as it enters our galaxy. Except we already know galaxies are different sizes. The distant galaxies that we can see are very large and the distances between here and there is excessive causing more redshift than our small galaxy can blueshift back to its original spectrum. The more distant a galaxy is the more accumulated gravity there is from nearby masses causing more redshift.

[@tonywells6990]

Time dilation is really only high enough to make a difference very close to black holes. Scientists have already figured that out.

[@JungleJargon]

@@tonywells6990 Time speeds up when gravity falls off and distance expands when gravity falls off.

[@tonywells6990]

@@JungleJargon Extreme time dilation is really seen only near a black hole. The effects of the gravity well of a galaxy is barely measurable but it is useful in observations of the CMB as that light passes near a galaxy and of course gravitational lenses allow us to see magnified galaxies billions of light years behind the lensing galaxy cluster, but there again the difference in time dilation is tiny. There is time dilation caused by cosmological redshift though, distant galaxies are observed in slow motion (so we could possibly see a supernova explosion in slow motion) and is equal to the redshift+1. So a galaxy with redshift 12 would have events slowed by a factor of 13.

[@JungleJargon]

@@tonywells6990 The fact remains that there is less gravity outside of the galaxy.

[@tonywells6990]

@@JungleJargon One notable example of a supernova observed for an extended period due to time dilation is Supernova Refsdal. This supernova, discovered in 2014, was observed in a galaxy cluster about 9.3 billion light-years away. The light from this supernova was gravitationally lensed by a massive galaxy cluster, creating multiple images of the supernova at different times. The time dilation effect caused by the expansion of the universe made the supernova appear to evolve more slowly than it would in a nearby galaxy (I would guess just over 2 times longer, supernovae usually dim after a few weeks). This allowed astronomers to study its light curve and spectral evolution over several months, providing valuable insights into the nature of supernovae and the early universe.

[@Chunkhead]

I think lack of metalicity solves your super-bright star issue. Stars in the early universe were bigger and brighter than anything we have today because they were made up of hydrogen and helium only, no metals. I'm surprised you didn't mention that.

[@MichaelSangirardi]

Seems to me your observer examples were not really examples of the observer being wrong.

[@democraticman3602]

So we make a telescope that can only see 13.4 billion years old to fit in with the big bang theory, uncanny that eh? Not before that, couldn't afford it.

[@gypsycruiser]

Not is but was .. everything we see literally was from the past…

[@ChrisM-hx9kv]

Commenting to feed the algorithm 🙃

[@zacheryanderson7363]

Fun video! My question is... Why are we putting more effort into looking at galaxies 330000000 light years away when we have so much of our own galaxy to scan for possible exo planets to colonize? No matter where we look we get a view into the past which is what i love most about is but i feel like we should look at our own back yard more and the neighbors less 🙃

[@venkyratnam]

Because jwst is specifically built for viewing distant objects (redshifted). We are going to deploy a different space telescope for mapping our own galaxy and nearby galaxies. That's Gaia telescope and will be launched in 2025 and we will get data starting from 2026.

[@zacheryanderson7363]

@@venkyratnam that is a very reasonable and logical point. Good to know...I still feel like humanity is doing it backwards lol. Thank you

[@darylmorse]

Another great video. You should have 10X as many subscribers.

[@spaceexplained-pe2qw]

or maybe Dr. Paul the Big Bang theory is wrong. And this proves the universe is not as old as we thought, and that it was actually created within six days, not billions and millions of years. And there was an amazing creator.

[@TeethToothman]

Prolly not.

[@dassemutlor]

Their are missing pieces to the puzzle of everything

[@manuelmaturana4573]

wait..doesnt the title of this video go against the very same concept you push forth of "if it's interesting is probably wrong.....

[@JungleJargon]

Inflators of the universe haven’t been observed.

[@marilynkozak17]

Missed you here, Dr. Sutter. Welcome back.

[@tune490]

Yes! The Answer to your question is Yes!

[@tune490]

However, it is only breaking the widely accepted cosmology. Lambda-CDM is an unfalsifiable model because it just keeps changing or updating!

[@dragonslayer7610]

Just image if we had a telescope mirror the size of our solar system.

[@romekin]

I am not interested in listening to ai video, the next things it will be generated ai scripts, and ai generated voice, and we wont know what real or not

[@daveq9818]

But when ai 2x smarter than our best .... ???? Wisdom is wisdom.

[@melgross]

No, it’s not breaking anything. I wish these terms would stop being used. We know that our knowledge and ideas of the universe is incomplete, so when we find something surprising, we shouldn’t be surprised. Additionally, we should know that some observations are not exactly what they may seem upon further analysis.

[@BFDT-4]

We broke Ptolemy, we broke Kopernick, we broke Galileo, we broke Newton, we broke Einstein, we broke every other explanation up to now. And if JWST can break the current explanations, and set us up for better ones.... Well, that's science, ain't it? ;)

[@BFDT-4]

Please use this mantra in the right way (from Firesign Theatre): Everything you Know is Wrong!!!! :D

[@tonywells6990]

We've not 'broken' Einstein yet.

[@Milan_Openfeint]

Of your list, only Ptolemy can be said to have been wrong.

[@QuantumJJean]

Maybe...

[@Delhi_Guy]

Big Bang theory is dead man walking.

[@АнатолийЛюбчик-ь4й]

Я не фізик, і тому не можу розрахунками довести, що нейромережі ниток первинних нейтронів, прискорюючись, утримали "вибухове" розширення, з точки зору теорії Великого вибуху - реакції "інфляції-анігіляції", з моєї ж точки зору - поступового, поетапного перетворення з квантового простору великих розмірів материньських протієвих квантів (не з крапки сингулярності), в нейромережі кілець первинних нейтронів, та подальшого поетапного багатошарового синтезу сучасного протію та сучасного дейтерію (гелію), протонів, нейтронів, та первинних фотонів реліктового фону. Можливо, навіть орлинний зір телескопа Джеймс Уебб не допоможе у цьому питанні. Тому що енерго еволюціонні процесси що відбуваються з первинною галактикою нейтронного типу, первинною галактикою протонного типу, навколишніми карликовими галактиками об'єкта Хога, це крайні, доволі сучасні енерго еволюційні процесси. Але, якщо уявити що у далекому майбутьньому нейтронні кільця нейромереж первинних галактик нейтронного типу витримають, тільки "трішечки-трішечки" по по відношенню до скорості світла, а по відношенню до внутришнього міксованного (інфляційно-анігіляційного) вмісту - реартивно прискоряться, поступово віддаючи карликові галактики, та за рахунок внутрішніх "анігіляційних" процессів синтезу, упорядковуючи, структуруючи, балансуючи свої внутришньо квантові елеменнти (на умовні макро кварки), перетворюючись у відносно сбалансовану, а по відношенню до сусідніх первинних великих розмірів материньських (ВРМ) галактик, відносно відкаліброванну, сбалансованну, та поляризовану структуру. На мою думку, на умовному початку часів Всесвіту, енергетичні перетворення які відбувались з нейромережами ВРМ протію, ВРМ дейтерію..., ще за брамою реліктового фону формували ядра майбутніх зірок, та майбутні ядра квантів ненародженних, а сгущенних та ущільнених ВРМ сферичних галактик, і були подібними до сучасних енергоеволюційних процессів, які відбувалися і відбуваються з нейромережами ланцюгів ВРМ галактик.

[@АнатолийЛюбчик-ь4й]

З народженням нейтронних зорь, чорних дір, центральної чорної діри ВРМ сферичні галактики перетворювались, "коллапсували" у галактичні кванти ВРМ квазарів. У тороїдних зоряних дисках ВРМ квазарів (у макро бозонах Хіггса першого покоління), як і планети різної густини, з протопланетного газопильового диску навколо зорі, формувалися кульові скупчення зірок, сфери ембріонів майбутніх карликових галактик. ВРМ квазар відштовхував від себе пил, гази, зірки, з рештою голодуючи скидав оберти, згасав, порошив зореутворенням, поступово закупорюючи центральну чорну діру зоряною сферою, перетворюючись на ВРМ елліптичну галактику. При умовному колапсі сфери із зорь, вона, її енергетичний центр, формує з ВРМ еллептичної галактики, сферу балджу, спіральні рукави, джети, галактичний тор ВРМ спіральної галактики. ВРМ спіральна галактика запліднена кулями ембріонів шарових скупчень зірок, "виношує", захищає, вигодовує народжує первинні сферичні карликові галактики і первинні карликові галактики квазарного (галактика Jades D gs - z14 d0 судячи з розмірів, можливо, карликовий квазар другого покоління - , в цьому випадку був народженний первинною спіральною карликовою галактикою). Кванти ВРМ спіральних галактик, в наш час вишиковуються у ланцюги "нейромереж". З збільшенням швидкості обертання ВРМ спіральної галактики, як і в ВРМ галактиці об'єкт Хога, її сусідці, відбувається відокремлення спіральних рукавів, наповнених ембріонами кульових скупчень зірок, у "недалекому" минулому від сфери балджу, а у теперішньому від первинної галактики протонного типу.

[@АнатолийЛюбчик-ь4й]

Іншими словами, з відокремленням тороїдного кільця первинної галактики нейтронного типу, з сферичними сателітами первинних карликових галактик на орбіті, відбувається напіврозпад ВРМ спіральної галактики. Первинні сфери карликових галактик, первинні карликові квазари, які мають зворотній напрямок обертання по відношенню до первинної галактики протонного типу, притягуються та стикаються з нею. що і відбулося у галактиці об'єкт Хога. Відбувається змішування, міксування, "анігіляція" - синтез та відсіювання по спину обертання сфер первинних галактик протонного типу, та первинних карликових галактик, синтез первинних сферичних міксованних галактик. В далекому майбутньому, після черги більш швидких енергетичних перетворень: з первинних сферичних міксованних галактик, в порівнянні з перетворенням сферичних ВРМ галактичних квантів, тому що в них вже є нейтронні зорі, чорні діри, спочатку в первинні мікс квазари, зародження в їхніх тороїдних кільцях сферичних ембріонів первинних мікс карликових галактик, перетворення первинних мікс квазарів в первинні мікс елліпсні галактики та після їх колапсу, подальшому перетворенні у мікс спіральні галактики першого покоління, народження мікс спіральною галактикою першого покоління, первинних мікс сферичних та первинних мікс квазарного типу карликових галактичних квантів першого покоління.

[@АнатолийЛюбчик-ь4й]

Подальший напіврозпад міксованних квантів спіральних галактик першого покоління, на кільця первинних мікс галактик нейтронного типу, та сфери первинних мікс галактик протонного типу. Вибудовування пар первинних міксованних галактичних нейтронних кілець та протонних сфер у кільцях "нейромереж" первинних галактик нейтронного типу, які поступово структуруються (на ум6овні кварки), калібруються, балансуються. Наша пісня нова починаєм її знову: Подальші зіткнення, вторинне міксування, не тільки з карликовими мікс галактичними квантами які мають зворотнє обертання до первинних мікс галактичних протонних сфер, але і первинних карликових галактичних квантів які не приймали участі в первинному міксуванні... Іншими словами, ускладнення в геометричній прогресії, енегетичні внутрішньоквантові перетворення, народження вторинних квантів, поетапне вибудовування ланцюгів галактичних багатошарових нейромереж, поетапний напіврозпад, поетапне міксування (анігіляція), поетапне відсіювання по спину, поетапне калібрування, ускладнення, структурування, можливо дроблення та поглинання кілець первинних галактичних квантів нейтронного типу, синтезованними кільцями квантів міксованних вторинних, третинних нейтронного типу галактик ..., які мають більшу частоту коливань, та в кінцевому підсумку, народження галактичних квантів відносно стійких (когерентних) до частоти дихання умовного батьківського квантового поля. Можливо частина народженних квантів різних поколінь, частина міксованних квантів різних поколінь, умовні макро кварки..., не візьмуть участі в умовній "інфляції аннігіляції" у синтезу, залищаючись у першородному, реліктовому вигляді, для нас у сучасному вигляді.

[@АнатолийЛюбчик-ь4й]

P.S. Виходячи з цієї точки зору, якщо сучасна галактична "інфляція аннігіляція" - перетворення ВРМ сферичних галактичних квантів, виходячи з теорії Великого вибуху, відбувається на протязі 13,8 мілліардів років, а квант Всесвіту в наш час, тільки на початку періоду напіврозпаду ВРМ спіральних галактик та синтезу первинних сферичних міксованних галактик, то, на мою думку, перетворення ВРМ протієвих квантів на сучасний протій, сучасний дейтерій, протони, нейтрони, лептони, нейтрино..., за брамою реліктового фону, відбувалося не двадцять хвилин. Можливо сотні тисяч років? Можливо міліони років?...

[@morgunstyles7253]

Was no big bang

[@ogxs1433]

It was already broken.

[@RobertHouse101]

Thanks for educating me about the many questions I've had. Rob

[@monolalia]

How on earth did your sense of personal integrity survive praising this sponsor? :(

[@DaFinkingOrk]

💰💰 Just let him have it and ignore the sponsor I guess, it's free money for people we like. Though I wish channels were more selective with who they advertise, or at the very least included hints that the sponsor is bad, I've just learned to completely ignore them and guess/hope most people do by now.

[@monolalia]

@@DaFinkingOrk I don’t begrudge him the money but it’s just depressing to see him advertise the very technology that drowns out good channels like his own with soulless unconscious mass-produced blather distilled from the collective work of who knows how many real people.

[@autumnleaves7907]

Yeah I couldn't quite believe it when I saw it. Super disappointing from someone who really ought to know better.

[@Enkaybee]

Get SponsorBlock. Let the KZbinrs make their money without having to waste your time listening to the sponsors 👍

[@nicknac1980]

​@monolalia A man's gotta do, what a man's gotta do... im just happy there are humans with his intelligence and guile still making honest videos... no shame, he has to eat people! Or you could be a patrion, if you don't like the advertising....

[@metagleam]

BlaBlaDocum

[@hedlamp1497]

it's a fractal, The universe is bigging and banging at the centre of every galaxy all the time,

[@kricketflyd111]

Dr. Becky says that's fixed now.

[@tenbear5]

🤣

[@infinitemonkey917]

Always nice to have you tone down the sensationalism.

[@YNVNEone]

NYT.....who cares what they say?

[@iugoeswest]

Video starts at 5:30

[@aarondegagne3405]

Great videos! Would much prefer to see this "podcast style" with a single camera, instead of the basic stock photos :)

[@BlizzAz]

I'm all for galaxies with bigger bursts. It sure would explain a lot!

[@anaphylastiks]

Your videos have come a long way. My problem is that, this conundrum is not interesting and therefore is probably correct. Happens lots, and you know this Paul.

[@MattCarvin]

“Interesting” is completely subjective.

[@benjaminbeard3736]

That's why it's "his" motto.

[@oleromer9525]

Her is no marimbas out there

[@misslayer999]

This was so interesting I had to stop listening to it because I need to get to sleep 😆. Will pick it back up tomorrow

[@MattCarvin]

If it’s interesting it’s wrong though.

[@misslayer999]

@@MattCarvin I know lol, but I'm a neuroscience student, and a total nerd, so I think all the little non-sensational stuff is actually super fascinating. Like, did you know that specialized astrocyte cells release glutamate? How cool is that?

[@MattCarvin]

@@misslayer999 haha I agree, that’s why I would change the phrase to “if it’s sensational sounding, it probably isn’t true” if I were him.

[@misslayer999]

@@MattCarvin right? That would definitely be more a more accurate way to put it lol

[@JungleJargon]

Dark matter hasn’t been observed.

[@kricketflyd111]

I've seen you on tv, not sure what series but you sound like you have an archeology hat in the closet. ❤

[@ZhanMorli]

Do you need a new tape measure to measure the Universe? Let's work with the postulates of Einstein's theory of relativity. And if we apply new technologies for this, using the experience of Michelson Morley on the airplane fixing speed 200, 300, 400 m/s., we will see how quantum gravity works. Such measurements are impossible on the satellite due to weightlessness.

[@wknajafi]

AI generated videos, especially science, are God Damn boring 🥱