Is the Mazda CX-90 Turbo S Premium Plus Worth It?

Рет қаралды 4,648

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 33

@kkcarl9566 10 ай бұрын

I test drove the Palisade, CX-90 TSPP, and the Telluride. The Mazda was absolutely the best - in appearance, options, handling, etc. I feel confident I made the best choice.

@jjac72 10 ай бұрын

Just ordered mine,it's a beautiful vehicle.

@abdusalamalamri 10 ай бұрын

Amazing review, Thanks.

@sheldonduffy9442 6 ай бұрын

Good review. I test drove the CX-9 and the 2024 Acura MDX. I was really impressed with how well the CX-9 compared to the Acura, it felt just as solid and equally luxurious for around 15k less. I went with the CX-90 PHEV Premium plus because it amped things up over the CX-90 and it was $5,000.00 cheaper than the Acura MDX Advanced that had the equivalent features to the Mazda. Plus, my wife liked it more…if she wanted me to spend 15-20k more who was I to argue😁.

@jonathantietz4472 3 ай бұрын

Thanks - I was deciding on extra features in the 280 Premium Plus or the extra power in the Premium - S. So surround cameras and heads-up display with a couple of other features sacrificed for the additional horsepower. Also a K-love fan.

@GQ37official 3 ай бұрын

the turbo s premium plus has pretty much every box and option ticked you can get including head up display and around view camera in addition to the extra power, but you can also get those options on some of the middle tier models I believe such as premium plus. The one I noticed wasn’t an option on the middle models anymore (like it was on cx-9 2019+) is the ventilated seats, for that you have to get the turbo s premium plus as if 2024 which is crazy. Hopefully they change that.

@biggeststeppa1 9 ай бұрын

I love this car and brand waaay too much. Help... No seriously, help!

@kdomster9141 10 ай бұрын

Just FYI Mazda just dropped the prices on CX90 , between 2000 and 4000dollars .Top trim drops to around 56K now 👍

@GQ37official 10 ай бұрын

lol yea I saw that the day after I posted this 😂 it’s a step in the right direction.

@kdomster9141 10 ай бұрын

@@GQ37official They need to allow CX90 nonS trims to benefit from 93 octanes for healthy power upgrade and than it would make sense ... CX90 nonS is the only Mazda turbo that does NOT allow power gain with 93 octane and I hate when Mazda plays politics like that !

@GQ37official 10 ай бұрын

@@kdomster9141 yea even the base inline 6 models should have the 340hp tune just like the 2016+ cx-9 had the same engine output across the board with 93.

@kdomster9141 10 ай бұрын

@@GQ37official s Sure why not , maybe base trim like Select at 37K now could be straight inline 6 for those who do not care for more power . Base 280hp from just regular gas makes no sense on such large vehicles where Koreans generic Kia and Hyundai are getting 290hp from old school V6 . If that 119lbs or torque from electric assist engine could somehow aid the acceleration at start and be combined with 332lb from I6 than 450lbsft would be a beast ...somehow Mazda missed the boat on combining both electric and gasoline power trains ....just Imagine 3.3 turboS power with added electric engine HP and TQ combined ... it would slam with almost 500lbsft and 360hp . Mazda will not chase BMW or Mercedes with 6 seconds to 60mph . Maybe such trim should be build as performance trim for extra 5K ?

@GQ37official 10 ай бұрын

@@kdomster9141 agreed there’s some untapped potential there and missed opportunity. I like Mazda, but I’m not sure what they’re doing. The whole Cx70 thing being the same as the Cx90 without the third row, yet costing the exact same is a bit confusing. I like the looks of the red interior, but just make that a color option on the cx90 and keep the rear seats folded down. I think it would have made more sense to bring the Cx60 to the US market. I also hope they bring the Mazda 6 back with the inline 6. That one could really be competitive performance-wise if they utilized electric motors with the inline 6 like you mentioned!

@jonathantietz4472 3 ай бұрын

What about Gas? Does the Turbo-S require Premium Gas?

@GQ37official 3 ай бұрын

@@jonathantietz4472 yes for the full hp tune you’re paying for in the turbo s you need to use premium fuel (you should use premium fuel anyway in a turbo engine) but otherwise from my understanding it will dumb the power down to the 280 spec as the sales team explained it to me. We only used premium in our cx9 and in my Infiniti and Nissan z so I’m used to that.

@sapphireVRgaming 5 ай бұрын

YIPPEEEE

@wisamputrus6196 8 ай бұрын

Hi, did you notice the lagging transmission issues that many are talking about? I remember you switched to sport mode from Regular/EV mode. Your thoughts!!!!

@GQ37official 8 ай бұрын

Yes I talked more about that in my first review comparing it to the cx9. It definitely hesitates going from first to 2nd or when you’re crushing and mash the gas to accelerate it definitely has hesitation to downshift. I’ve noticed this with a lot of newer vehicles, I suspect trying to meet newer emissions standards has changed gear ratios etc as this is becoming more common. That’s probably why going back to my cx9 it felt more responsive and quicker off the line (in addition to being primary fwd pull vs push) the cx90 feels good when it gets going but it never has that push you in your seat feeling. However, the 340hp variant is better than the 280hp one and that’s what I really wanted to find out.

@sheldonduffy9442 6 ай бұрын

@@GQ37officialYou really need to test drive the PHEV, it is quicker than the Turbo S. However, it lacks some of the features you can get in the Turbo S trims though.

@willmallory9085 10 ай бұрын

2:54 They owe you money for advertising.

@GQ37official 10 ай бұрын

They can throw one of these in and we'll call it even 😆

@puravida5683 3 ай бұрын

Love the Smooth Jazz music! I'm buying the 2025 Mazda CX-90 Turbo S Premium Plus. White exterior, tan interior. It is great value for the price! I was originally going to buy a Lexus LC 500 coupe.