Is the US running out of Social Security?

[@pfefferle74]

Don't worry, the system has it all covered. The sugar and fast food industry will make sure that US life expectancy in on the decline.

[@fubytv731]

Lol, medical technology is also improving. Life expectancy has never been this high..

[@huckleberryfinn6578]

Nobody force you to eat fast food and sugar. People need to learn self-discipline and take responsibility for own decisions.

[@J-Pow]

​@@fubytv731 Actually, it's been in the decline in the US compared to other countries.

[@Sinaeb]

@@huckleberryfinn6578poverty does

[@amirmirzaei3940]

fast food wouldn't be successful if people didn't go there. so the people are just as fault on that issue

[@Kholdstare52]

As a 37 year old with 20 years of SS taxes behind me and another 20 years ahead of me... This video makes my skin crawl.

[@AndrewPonti]

Agreed. Just turned 36 and I started when I was 15 even. Once again, we Millennials are funding and losing out to the Boomers. AGAIN.

[@kyleolson9636]

It should be mildly reassuring to anyone worried about social security because the fixes are pretty simple. Some combination of tax increases and/or reduced benefits will keep social security intact indefinitely. The only problem is that we will need to reach the 11th hour before the government will be forced to enact either of these wildly unpopular fixes.

[@ChineseKiwi]

@@kyleolson9636ha no. See my post above. This has been solved for a bare minimum 20 years now Down Under.

[@ChineseKiwi]

@@kyleolson9636ha no. See my post in the reply to this main comment. We have solved this for a bare minimum at least 20 years now Down Under. Yet another video which an American 'problem' is highlighted yet I can't relate to as it's already been solved.

[@IdleNomad]

I have two retirement calculations. One which includes my projected social security income, and one that doesn't. I won't stop until I'm confident I can retire without Social Security. I consider the future Social Security to be in true jeopardy, because this country is literally packed with right wing nuts who I'm convinced would opt to be homeless in retirement and put the elderly out on the street rather than accept the fact that they're helping support someone with a disability. I've paid hundreds of thousands to the Social Security administration in my life. If that money comes back to me in any amount when I turn 62 I'll use it to buy property outside of the United States.

[@Susanhartman.]

The thought of retirement makes me cry. My apologies to everyone who have retired and filing social security during this time after putting in all those years of work just to lose everything to a problem you weren't to blame for.it's especially difficult for people who are retired.

[@mariaguerrero08]

True, It has never been easier to understand how to build your money after retirement than it is right now with the inflation, when you may study and experience a completely variegated market passively by employing a successful portfolio-advisor. The impacts of the U.S. dollar's gain or fall on investments, in my opinion, are complex.

[@mikegarvey17]

I fully agree and place great value on my advisor's role in guiding my daily investments. They excel in both long and short strategies, managing risk for potential gains and protection against market downturns. Their access to exclusive insights and in-depth analysis makes exceeding expectations a regular outcome. In the two-plus years I've worked with my advisor, I've gained over 1.2million dollars.

[@ThomasChai05]

@@mikegarvey17My partner’s been considering going the same route, could you share more info please on the advisor that guides you.

[@mikegarvey17]

*Izella Annette Anderson* maintains an online presence. Just make a simple search for her name online.

[@Grace.milburn]

I just looked her up on the web and I would say she really has an impressive background in investing. I will write her an email shortly.

[@kenmeadows444]

There's lots of other factors here: we're living longer, the younger generations are having less children, housing is less affordable, income is not increasing, the working class are unable to build wealth. Essentially, more people will need it and less will be paying for it.

[@RextheRebel]

We aren't living longer though... We've had a decreasing lifespan for about 10 years.

[@zeryphex]

having "fewer" children

[@kenmeadows444]

@@RextheRebel in the US maybe but almost everywhere else in the developed world

[@Bill56136]

Also, the investment return rate is too low in SS trust fund. Across board, everyone loses money with their money invested in SS, compared to investing in s&p 500 by a lot. Unbelievable😂

[@yamchayaku]

living longer does not mean the quality of life at old age has improved. Living longer means you're going to be living with a broken body longer than the person before you. You're still going to get health issues before you hit 60, and it will reach its peak before you hit 70. You'll get hit with health issues earlier if your job is physically demanding, like the trades.

[@mcryan3890]

Lol why do poor Americans have to pay more percent than rich ones

[@francookie9353]

Because what are they gonna do? No power, no leverage, easy to exploit.

[@mcryan3890]

​@@francookie9353damn it's over for those poor people :(

[@duncanfriend3766]

The benefit when you retire is capped so they only tax paychecks up to what that capped benefit would be. Sounds unfair, but it's actually extremely fair.

[@Starcrash6984]

@@duncanfriend3766 That's true, it's "fair". But it's not "economical". It's really weird that conservatives often discuss this and many other issues of how the rich are treated in terms of "fairness", but don't really care about "fairness" towards the poor. It's not exactly fair that the top 1% of earners in this country live to the age of 87 while the bottom 50% live to 74, but conservatives aren't exactly working to fix that (given that the biggest factor is access to health care). So most of us will pay into social security for our entire lives and draw from it for a very small portion, and those who need it the least will have it the longest.

[@francookie9353]

@@mcryan3890 Well ... yeah. But it's always been like that. The poor get f.cked over, the end.

[@BaffySchenck]

I’m on Social Security and Medicare. The thing that happens is yes we got a three point whatever percent increase last year but my Medicare part B payment also went up by $60 a month more than my cola so I actually took a $60 a month cut. I literally made best decisions when i started working with an advisor

[@MagdaleneM-f3q]

Totally agree. A good financial adviser is a game-changer. My portfolio is balanced for all market conditions, and it has returned 120% since early last year. My adviser and I are now working toward hitting a seven-figure goal, which could take another year.

[@florianmadison]

That sounds interesting! Could you share the details of your adviser? I'm urgently in need of one.

[@MagdaleneM-f3q]

Over the years, I’ve worked with a few, but I’ve stuck with “Julianne Iwersen Niemann” for the last five years. Her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s well-regarded in her field-look her up.

[@MagdaleneM-f3q]

My CFA Julianne Iwersen Niemann, a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.

[@florianmadison]

I just looked her up, and her credentials are impressive! I've already reached out and scheduled a call for some guidance. Thank you!

[@d1j16]

I know what Congress will do: whatever benefits the investor class the most and maximizes pain for the poor and middle class.

[@TomNook.]

You can be poor and an investor.

[@mikeunger4165]

raising the retirement age. Investors get more workers and rich people don't have to pay any more

[@glacialis3329]

It's fascinating that the system already taxes the middle and lower classes at a higher percentage than the upper class due to the cap at $186k. Sure, the ultrawealthy won't use this system for benefits, but why then should they get to reap even higher income? The reward for being rich is...getting to be even more rich

[@briand8090]

Amazing. I'm pretty sure the founders would have gone straight for taxing the rich and placing the greater burden on them. That was kind of the point of the whole revolution...

[@SuperMrgentleman]

​@@TomNook.Not an accredited investor

[@001sander2]

Taxing productivity instead of wealth has been killing the economy for generations

[@JohnDorian-j7x]

"Wealth" is literally not real. There's a reason why we always have and will continue to tax tangible in-hand "productivity" as it is generated... and not "wealth"... which can literally disappear just as fast as Enron.

[@zachmaster426]

taxation is theft

[@churblefurbles]

No, that would be mass immigration.

[@wittynclever]

Consumption based is such a simple solution to the tax system. Not only will it bring in more revenue at a lower tax rate, it is much simpler to administer and you would incentives savings. You can mitigate almost all the regressive aspects by exempting all "non-prepared" food (ie regular groceries, but include restaurants), diapers, baby formula, day care, public transportation and health care and tax everything else (both goods and services). Housing spend would be the biggest regression spot left, but also one of the biggest sources of revenue from the rich. You could mitigate most of the burden by improving the SNAP program with the additional revenue you take in form the consumption tax. You can apply this to businesses as well, with no exemptions

[@dwighthouse]

@@wittynclever “with no exemptions” - therein lies the problem. In any form of democracy, people or politicians will always find a way to carve out a nice little exception or three. Our current tax system used to be simpler too, and look at it now.

[@nicolasbenson009]

Considering the shaky economy, I'm keen to know best, how people split their pay, how much of it goes into savings, spendings or investments. I’d be retiring/working much less in 5 years, and sometimes earn up to $160K per year, but nothing to show for it yet.

[@TinaJames222]

thats personal, you should connect with an advisor for proper financial/investment planning, never can tell what the future holds

[@tatianastarcic]

No doubt, having the right plan is invaluable, my portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit 100% rise from early last year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, tho this could take till Q4 2024.

[@Vincent-j8u]

talking about coaching, do u consider anyone worthy for recommendations? I have about 80k to taste the waters now that large cap stocks are at a discount... thanks

[@tatianastarcic]

I've shuffled through investment coaches and yes, they can be positively impactful to an individual's portfolio, but do your due diligence to find a coach with grit, one that withstood the 08' crash. For me, Melissa Terri Swayne turned out to be better and smarter than all the advisors I ever worked with till date, I’ve never met anyone with as much conviction.

[@sharonwinson-m8g]

I just checked her out on google and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.

[@beltranfrances4768]

As a European, the sole fact of BEING American feels stressful and anxiety-inducing to me. Seems like if something bad happens to you, the only way is charity.

[@michaelhutchings6602]

The European mind cannot comprehend self reliance and not depending on a massive government to take care of you.

[@bezretmet]

gofundme is a defacto pillar of the american healthcare industry. let that sink in

[@grmpEqweer]

​@@bezretmet I had a friend who died when his gofundme failed. I didn't know he was doing it, a lot of his friends didn't realize he was in trouble? He needed around $1000 for a month of diabetes supplies. He was a type 1 diabetic. ...I still feel very sad about this.

[@geyoda64]

I don't know. At least in the US they have 401k, IRA and other vehicles to save money for later. Doesn't exist in my country. Everything gets taxed multible times.

[@a11u45]

I don't get this, some or most European countries have more aged populations than the US does, so there is potential for these issues to pop up in Europe too

[@rmutter]

No, we are not all in this together; the wealthy legally exclude themselves from the FICA salaried worker pool via political manipulation. Therefore, they clearly do not contribute their necessary share of proportional earnings and monetary gains for the benefit of the general U.S. population. This abomination is grotesquely absurd in our democracy.

[@gdradio5854]

You're right. No one should be taxed for the benefit of someone else's retirement.

[@meinelust]

​@gdradio5854, so you're againts health insurance as well?

[@andrewhardwick4480]

@@gdradio5854 that's not what they said. They said it's an abomination that they don't pay taxes

[@gdradio5854]

So you think health insurance premium is the same as a tax? One is voluntary.@@meinelust

[@gdradio5854]

It isn't an abomination. I believe it is making a good case pointing out that taxation is theft. If you want to take form others because they have more than you then you are a thief.@@andrewhardwick4480

[@HectorSnipes]

I’ve been working and paying into Social Security for over 40 years, and there’s no way I’m waiting any longer to take it. I’m grabbing it early-might as well take the sure thing. At this point, I’m all about investing in myself and putting money into the market. Over the years, I’ve learned that building real wealth comes from making smart investments.

[@grego6278]

Yes, building wealth comes from making smart investments. Having a mentor is really important. It can be tough to find someone experienced, but it’s a wise decision if you're not familiar with the market.

[@BateserJoanne]

You're absolutely right. I tried investing on my own for a while, but the market just wasn't working in my favor. Eventually, I hired an advisor, even though I was hesitant at first. To my surprise, I ended up beating the market by more than 15%. At first, I thought it was just luck, but it happened again the following year. Since then, I've stuck with having an analyst handle my investments.

[@crystalcassandra5597]

That's quite impressive! Can you share more information about your financial advisor?

[@BateserJoanne]

Her name is ' Rebecca Noblett Roberts ' Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

[@lolitashaniel2342]

I just checked her out on google and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.

[@DistrustHumanz]

Missing from this video; for over 40 years, the older retirees continued to get cost of living increases, but the wages for the younger generations that paid those taxes stagnated. Almost everyone points the blame in the wrong direction; rich people not paying enough taxes, or the government raiding the coffers... while both of these combined represent only a fraction of a percentage. It is very simple. The older generations took far more from the system than they put into it. Generational theft from widespread (and socially accepted) greed.

[@henrytep8884]

Socially accepted and democratically voted on. Old people actually vote, no wonder they get the laws passed to their favor

[@roninecostar]

I saw someone else commenting I must be a right wing nut for having this opinion. I just see the abolishment of SS as a moral obligation towards my childrens for them to prosper.

[@chaosburger307]

​@@roninecostarno, not a right wing nut, just an acellerationist. Some of us want things that are unstable to fail quickly instead of dragging out. I assume you want it to fail quickly because we only fix things when broken and want it fixed before you or those you care about retire.

[@rtquest22]

@@chaosburger307 if what you mean that you want the program fixed then your arguing for bigger govt and more power to the politicians because they created more problems than solving it. If you really don't trust those running the govt then you shouldn't be putting your faith in any of the pon-z scheme programs in the first place.

[@nari5161]

Hook line and sinker for being pitted against your fellow poors. Cost of living increases for benefits are necessary, and wages should have also increased with inflation and cost of living. Your fight is with the billionaire class, as it Always has been

[@Yu-Xiao-2028]

As an ex-US international student who had previously contributed, I hope the little effort helps 😅

[@PokemonBlueVersion]

Lol, thanks for your contribution! It does not go un-noticed by me.

[@Imbadatgolf]

This got me 😂 yes thank Yu!

[@jkell2888]

Thank you Yu

[@garyprime6983]

One alarming bit of info I remember learning from a college law class, is that the SS that you contribute is actually going to the current/next generations of retirees it’s not saving for you. Yours comes from the next generation contributing.

[@hardikagrawal7813]

scott galloway said something along the same lines i can assure you , you'd love watching his recent ted talks!!!

[@troothcentral-qz9pz]

Well sure, just like a pension plan.

[@salamaleikum9368]

That’s actually a good working system for pensions. Just look in Germany. But it’s need to be improved cause of the demographic change. That why German government improved it with a pension fond in stock exchange, in which you can invest. From this money they pay subsidies for the pensions. Actually a good working system which seems very American.

[@jojo_rose341]

and the birth rates are decreasing

[@DavidJohnson-dc8lu]

Social security for he public will run out, social security for the financial markets will never stop.

[@kyleolson9636]

Social security will not run out of money. Some combination of increased taxes and/or reduced benefits will happen, but under its current form it will never run out of money.

[@rtquest22]

​@@kyleolson9636wrong again. SS is filled with IOUS that are subsidized temporarily with fed reserve debt monetization that you eventually have to pay back w interest through taxation. Why do you think the politicians pilfered it in the first place? Ask Bush.

[@MansaMusa_ll_of_Timbuktu]

@@kyleolson9636 I encourage everyone here to read up on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), specifically "The Deficit Myth" - written by Stephanie Kelton (which is available on Spotify, no this isn't an ad). There is no need to do ANY of the things mentioned in this video. Yes there is a shortage of cash to pay benefits, but all Congress has to do it COMMIT to paying the full balance even when there's no more money in the trust fund and not enough coming in through the payroll tax. Yes, just like in Medicare For All. But wait, won't that mean the Fed is printing more money than it gets back in taxes??? YES. Every time the US Deficit INCREASES, WE THE PEOPLE get a surplus of money in our pockets. AND, the Gov doesn't actually lose money, the Fed sells the exact amount it "loses" (i.e. the Fiscal Deficit) back to the private market in Bonds. (This is also where the interest rate is set to mitigate inflation etc.) The point is, Congress does play a role, and this is not a theory, but how our current government spending works. It's just that not enough people are economists and so congress(men/women) try to get elected by saying what the voters want to hear. Shocked that Vox is not up to date with their economics.

[@Wizznilliam]

And those are the people who pay less than 1% of their income on SS. The answer to this "problem" is obvious. But the politicians are paid to make it seem complicated.

[@SuperMrgentleman]

​​@@kyleolson9636"It won't run out of money it could just have nowhere near the amount of money needed to pay its obligations"- I tell my landlord the same thing when I give him $200 for the month's rent "oh yeah I didn't run out of money I just don't have enough to pay you everything we agreed on, and this will continue unless we change how much you think you're getting or I get a job"

[@klf9161]

I don't know why it's never brought up that we could just fund social security out of the general budget. That would result in either higher deficits or cuts to other areas. No one says that we're going to have to cut the military budget because the deficit is going up. The government can fund whatever it wants to fund. This attitude that just because a program is set up with a certain funding mechanism it has to stay that way is ridiculous. The congress makes laws, it can change the funding mechanism for social security.

[@harttdm]

That would be a bailout for Main Street and we all know that only Wall Street gets bailouts.

[@darexinfinity]

It just leads to more taxes or more instability in benefits. Congress might choose to reduce benefits in any given year.

[@aiman9088]

Benefit for poor?! Not in my America

[@dosadoodle]

That is equivalent to raising taxes -- either explicitly doing so, or by accruing more debt that we then have to pay interest on (and pay a higher interest rate the higher the debt goes).

[@luddity]

Especially as they've raided it periodically in the past. They should give back what they took, with interest.

[@Greggsberdard]

The high prices have affected my retirement plan to retire at 62, work part-time, and build my savings. I worry that those who experienced the 2008 financial crisis faced fewer challenges than I do now. The stock market's volatility, combined with a reduced income, makes me anxious about having enough for retirement.

[@BateserJoanne]

The retirement crisis will worsen because many can't save due to low wages, inflation, and high rent. Investing in stocks with a good strategy can help, but it's important to be cautious. I advise you to get a financial advisor for guidance on entry and exit points.

[@VictorBiggerstaff]

If you lack market knowledge, your best bet is to seek advice or support from a consultant or investing coach. Contacting a consultant may sound simple, but it's how I've managed to stay afloat in the market and increase my portfolio to roughly 65% since January. It is, in my opinion, the best way to get started in the industry right now.

[@crystalcassandra5597]

I’ve been worried sick about the current state of my portfolio, who is your advisor?

[@VictorBiggerstaff]

Finding financial advisors like Rebecca Nassar Dunne who can assist you shape your portfolio would be a very creative option. There will be difficult times ahead, and prudent personal money management will be essential to navigating them.

[@lolitashaniel2342]

I looked her up, and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon. Thank you

[@bunnyfernwood]

What a joy to live in a world that bleeds us dry and leaves us with nothing

[@Username_CC_]

*Country, No other country does this poorly

[@schwarzwolfram7925]

Why do you think each successive generation is less conservative than the previous (even as they grow older)? It's unlikely that someone will be conservative when there's nothing left to conserve. Note: That statement is a joke. Conservatives are not about conserving culture and values; only about conserving a monarchy structure, either through force or finance. That's literally what it is based on.

[@rogergeyer9851]

As if incessant whining will get you ahead in life.

[@HelgaCavoli]

*Country. Not "World".

[@churblefurbles]

@@schwarzwolfram7925 The ones conserving NATO and its wars aren't about a monarachy based structure.

[@juiceman_3]

With no more pensions and 401ks that require people to invest, it’s going to bad for a lot of people

[@tttgaming8762]

Nobody’s fault but there own

[@DavidGravesExists]

I resisted investing for a long time because I thought of the stock market in general as immoral. But it is really the *only* way I'll be able to stay off the streets when I reach "retirement" age- assuming I don't lose it all in a stock market crash. I hold out some hope for AGI if this AI stuff makes its founders the richest people to ever live, but I feel like the US will be one of the *last* wealthy countries to implement it.

[@sepachortels6366]

@@DavidGravesExistsweak

[@米空軍パイロット]

​@@DavidGravesExistsThink of it this way. It's more immoral to stuff your money under your mattress rather than letting it circulate through investments. By investing, you are contributing to future productivity.

[@Aki_Lesbrinco]

​@@DavidGravesExistsImmoral why? It cheats on its wife? I swear, people love to assign morality to the most random and neutral things .

[@crashoverride2345]

You sort of skipped over the part where presidents since 1983 have been using social security to fund government expenditures.

[@mtgamateurnight]

Yep, I said the same thing. Glad I am not the only one who knows about this.

[@robnelson6545]

That’s the trust fund

[@spydude38]

It doesn't impact the trust fund and is often cited as them having robbed social security and that is why it is going to be going under. That is completely false.

[@Sobepome]

That's not really accurate, at least not in implications of what you're saying. Social Security is only allowed to invest its surplus in federal debt because there were concerns that if it was allowed to invest in anything, it would quickly become a monster on the stock exchange and cause problems. The US government issues bonds to cover the money that social security is giving it, and it then turns around and spends that money on other things. This isn't actually a problem unless you believe the US government will default on its debt, in which case social security is the least of your problems. It's dangerous to hear something you think other people don't know about and assume it is the whole picture and isn't information being told to you to manipulate you. It also isn't actually very hard to find out what the actual situation with social security's funding is as long as you don't take the first thing fox news tells you at face value.

[@mtgamateurnight]

We can't even pay our debts to others, what makes you think we can pay debts to ourselves? @@Sobepome

[@jonathannielson4406]

5:37 calling Jeff Bezos a high "earner" is hilarious

[@erroryoutubernotfound1933]

And he is patiently waiting for his retirement money...

[@DjDiversant]

Why Vox is deleting comments?

[@DeesBees85]

@@DjDiversantthey’re not you liar

[@DjDiversant]

@@DeesBees85 they deleted my comment about aid for Ukraine.

[@DustyfootPhilosopher]

@@DjDiversantmight be u tuuube “sense or ship” 😅

[@pcb462]

SSI is easily fixable. Remove the limit on top earners in this country. You’re welcome for solving the problem.

[@xcqematic1]

Then you need to remove the cap on benefits so it will be back to square one. You are not welcome

[@silcodon]

@@xcqematic1 Why do you need to remove the cap? That's not a social democracy, that's pure capitalism and everyone for themselves again

[@xcqematic1]

@@silcodon look up why and how we got people to agree on SS. It was not another tax grab scheme. It was for retirement. What you are suggesting is tax increase, which is already unfair because the top 1% pays over 60% of all income tax while the bottom half pays 0%.

[@silcodon]

@@xcqematic1 Yeah that's a social democracy, not unfair, everyone in the world does that. And everything is a tax with intended use for the general population, it's a tax to pay for retirements, you just don't want to call it that.

[@xcqematic1]

@@silcodon as long as the majority of people want it, we can change it. I doubt people want to increase SS without removing the cap just so that the program gets 10 more years.

[@RevRudd]

Rather than waiting for the government to figure this out, get an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) and begin to prepare for retirement now. Take charge of your own future. Even a moderately successful IRA should be able to cover whatever gap that a reduced Social Security program will provide. But waiting on the Federal Govt. to solve this is irresponsible.

[@JBoy340a]

Agree. Just assume SS is not going to be there and start saving for your retirement. At worst, SS will be there, and you have extra money.

[@JJ-hb9in]

Imagine getting those 12.4% (6.2% you pay and the same your employer pays - i.e. the value is still created by you), and being able to put that in an IRA

[@LemmeCheckMark]

Who cares, stop relying on the govt. Make and save your own money.

[@kwv889j]

Concerning rich people, as the video notes, rich people are mainly paid via stock options or by owning the company, not via a cash salary. This is how they pay so little tax, as a percentage of their total compensation, compared to everyone else. If we could change the tax laws to tax all employment compensation that same way, no matter the form of the compensation, then that would close many loopholes with the fairness of taxation. Whether there are enough rich people for that to make a big difference for social security funding is a good question.

[@crusherven]

Capital gains do get taxed, and the top earners in this country pay a huge proportion of federal revenue. And unfortunately the problem with trying to tax the richest even more is that they're really good at either avoiding taxes completely or lobbying to get exemptions aka "loopholes" made. That's why back when the top marginal rate was like 90% we actually had lower tax receipts than we do today. But I'm sure someone thought it was more fair.

[@neycongjuico7395]

I get RSUs as part of compensation. Whenever they vest, it gets added onto my income and my income gets taxed at the vesting amount at the end of the year. But I don’t even actually have that money because I never sold those stocks, but I still get taxed on the amount that it vests on. :( Now if the stock goes down the next year and I sell, I can’t even get a refund on the surplus I got taxed on the previous year, and additionally I’ll still get taxed on any capital gains on the stocks I sold. Idk what loopholes rich people use but doesn’t change the fact that this double tax (income tax + capital gains) hurts.

[@quantumsmith371]

​@@neycongjuico7395 That's a little bit disingenuous, RSUs at all the companies I've worked at have payroll withholdings that auto sells some percentage of the vested amount to cover income taxes. You can choose to pay the withholding in cash, but that's a choice. If you are in that situation I would encourage you to reach out to your HR department to up your withholding percentage so that you aren't left trying to cover the price difference out of pocket.

[@yitzhaktolentino4214]

@@neycongjuico7395 Ask your employer/HR or whoever it is appropriate to ask if you can pay taxes on the amount at the point of vesting. I’d recommend, which im sure you already do/know, look for options to minimize your tax burden overall. Think 401k. May I ask why you sell your shares? I understand you said the stock drops but I really want to know why you would sell if a stock drops. Everybody’s goal/strategy is different and if yours is minimizing taxes then selling probably wouldn’t be a great option.

[@ChurchofCthulhu]

The biggest problem is that about half of all corporations use those loopholes to avoid paying hundreds of billions (probably in the trillion range) in taxes every year.

[@HettesKvek]

Another thing to remember: When people receive these social security payments, they spend it on products/services they need. The spent money goes to a business, which employs people. Social security money flows back into the economy. Social security money is not wasted money.

[@RobertBeedle]

​@hotarubinariko would you rather there be no businesses? 😅

[@plantcatto]

yes! i'm on social security since i'm disabled, and a lot of the money i receive goes to treatments so i can hopefully work more in the future. so far, i have been able to afford diagnosis for multiple conditions, compression socks, an oximeter, and a cane. i have also been able to help my elderly cat with this money. i'm forever grateful for the money i receive.

[@troothcentral-qz9pz]

Most government spending works like that. People make an income, pay taxes and spend the rest.....someone else then makes an income and pays taxes and spends the rest.....someone else makes an income and pays taxes and spends the rest.....and so on. The only money actually lost is if it's spend buying products from out of country.

[@TwoRMSquared]

Oh those 5 option circles I can almost guarantee which one(s) congress will do.

[@laiswith2dots]

Indeed, rich people can lobby, poor ones can't.

[@478Johnnyboy]

@@laiswith2dotshell half of congress are millionaires themselves because they don’t get caught on the insider trading they do. They aren’t going to rig the game to hurt themselves. The fact that congress is the #2 wall street earners behind…actual wall street people should have been a 🚩. But instead we just know this fact and nothing is done.

[@Eikenhorst]

Yea, I think we can all agree that whatever happens nobody is going to pay more tax. Since the rich don't care that they get less social security at the end, we know that it will be cut to make up for the shortfall. Or plan b) they will not do anything, they just borrow the money and increase the government deficit instead as long as that party lasts.

[@JohnDorian-j7x]

Taxing the rich even more won't solve the problem, at least not in the long run. What they need to do is just bite the bullet and increase ss payroll taxes... you know... kind of like how it was originally intended.@@laiswith2dots

[@spydude38]

It happened once already in 1983. Democrats and Republicans came together to pass legislation that kept SS going until 2033. It can be done.

[@Dis_is_fine]

Then there are people with work visas paying into this who will definitely never see a cent.

[@ailo4x4]

Actually, most countries have reciprocal tax agreements with the US regarding SS. For example, if you worked in the UK for 10 years and then moved back to the US (it also works the other direction) you can claim the credits earned in the other country to complete your requirements and collect. You only collect in one country, of course, but you get to combine the credits from both.

[@DavidGravesExists]

And Americans working abroad that are victim to US' double-taxation policy (one of the only countries in the world that has such a thing), where we pay taxes in two countries at once... and often don't see tax returns for either of them.

[@ailo4x4]

@@DavidGravesExists Which is why many of us expat Americans give up our citizenship. It has nothing to do with our level of patriotism and everything to do with our level of taxation.

[@preferanonymous]

That's because it's a tax, not a retirement account. It's a welfare benefit. And I love it and I hope everyone benefits from it. But it's a tax that we pay to support a welfare program.

[@ailo4x4]

​@@preferanonymousumm, no, it's not a tax or a welfare benefit. A benefit means you put nothing into it. A tax means you pay more for more than your share. It's a forced retirement savings account for people who WORK. You pay into it for your entire working life, the government gets the interest, and you draw it out when you get to retirement age. It's a safety net and not intended to be the end all, be all for your retirement. And it's there for very good reasons.

[@commonsenseparty1396]

I’m paying for something I’m never going to see or benefit from.

[@1850muse]

That's not entirely the take-away, though. As she said in the video, there are changes to the system that could be made, such as raising the salary cap or taxing investment income.

[@RobertBeedle]

You are benefiting from it now.

[@haydenmalesky2518]

To some extent yes and no, I mean you could say the exact same thing about insurance. If you never get in a car wreck or if your house never burns down of floods, should you get the benefit for the money you put into insurance all those years? It doesn’t work that way.

[@troothcentral-qz9pz]

Even if the surplus runs out completely we'll still get at least about 77% of the currently calculated amount.

[@annesand7157]

Don’t worry, I am 65 and I am not benefiting from it now. Who is benefiting from our hard earned money…Those on SSI, SSDI, spouses who never worked.

[@paulh1862]

Our food has made us sicker, our healthcare is now more expensive, and the citizens have to pay the price

[@Gripmagic]

This is the cost of allowing the government to regulate/legislate everything, they destroy all they touch

[@QWER-wv5kn]

Right. GMO. 미국의 유전자조작식품회사는 이미 악마를 넘어섰다.

[@spydude38]

Because they shoved bad food into your mouth and made you eat it. Then they locked you inside your home so you could not exercise.

[@dbjungle]

It seems a bit weird some politicians are advocating for tax cuts and some other forms of increased spending when this is around the corner doesn't it?

[@TheCatherineCC]

It's easier to understand once you accept one party is full of traitors who are comfortable with weakening the country for their russian masters.

[@reecedrystek2992]

Why? Social Security is supposed to be fully funded by the 6.2% payroll tax. The are supposed to be mutually exclusive.

[@Anti-socialSocialClub]

All the solutions provided are temporary. You need to increase the working population faster than the ageing population. There are only 2 sustainable ways of doing that; 1. Increase birthrates (good luck with that) 2. Increase migration This has been known for ever, it's just politically taboo

[@yeet1337]

There is social security in the US?

[@raphaelrougeland]

Exactly the first question that came to my mind 😂

[@NyarlathotepCrawlingChaos]

Yes, there is.

[@mrpw1402]

Kinda, not really

[@no_name4796]

Only if you are a billionares. Somehow those who are filthy rich can live way better then anyone else, and pay way less in proportion Like taxes

[@jazzyj6640]

Nope. 😂

[@tahirisaid2693]

Relying solely on social security isn't advisable. I've learned that the most efficient path to wealth, both in acquiring a million and sustaining billionaire status, is through wise investment strategies.

[@georgestone0123]

Depending solely on social security limits financial growth. Investing wisely is key to achieving and maintaining wealth. It's about taking control of our financial future through smart investment decisions.

[@kueller917]

It's the most efficient path to _wealth_ but it's not a stable and risk-free form of _basic income_ and has a barrier of entry.

[@dr.boring7022]

Honestly the most stable path to wealth is related to healthcare as a whole: working in the health field. Doctors, nurses, etc make lots and are in constant demand. The only thing is motivation though, as being a doctor isn't for everyone, but that applies to everything really.

[@godofrock]

Only elect to the congress and senate those whom will support social security and fully fund it consistently. This will ensure that everyone will have this when they retire.

[@garoria4161]

tax the rich

[@RipVanFish09]

Yes

[@gdradio5854]

The highest tax bracket in the USA is 37%. I'd say that is quite a lot of taxing.

[@United.]

37% isnt much especially if tax loopholes are being used...@@gdradio5854

[@meferswift]

@@gdradio5854 tax anyone making more than 10 dollar with 75% taxes.

[@tauntingeveryone7208]

​@@gdradio5854not really considering it caps out. Also, the more you earn the more tax cuts you qualify for. Remember the tax bracket used to go up to 78% and those who were taxed still had millions to their name.

[@Parazeta]

Germany has been subsidizing its retirement fund for decades. Who will benefit and who will lose from a change in the system is a political question - not an economic one. There is enough money. The question is who will get it

[@MyCamilla1989]

Germany is run by Social Market Economy (Soziale Marktwirtschaft), which is superior to the American cut throat capitalism.

[@reecedrystek2992]

Define "There is enough money." If Germany is subsidizing the retirement fund then that means another program is not taking place.

[@Parazeta]

@@reecedrystek2992 That actually isn't true. A country's budget doesn't work like your own. Whether or not a program can be financed is a political question. The budget is decided by politicians, not some bank telling the government how much they are able to pay.

[@Gripmagic]

​@@Parazetaand that right there is why your money keeps becoming less and less valuable because you actually think that the politicians can just throw more imaginary money at a problem without driving up inflation and devaluing the currency.

[@Parazeta]

@@Gripmagic That is true, if an economy is already at maximum capacity. As long as there is workforce, space and resources to be turned into products or services, those people would be happy to work for current prices. In short: More money equals higher prices is too simplified. Distribution of wealth is a way more important factor

[@CompoundingTime]

If they removed the cap from social security, the fund would be good for the rest of our lifetimes.

[@wiseguy3696]

Not necessarily. Higher payments into social security also means higher payouts. The cap was put in place to stop the SSA from paying out large sums to the wealthy

[@General8675]

@@wiseguy3696 They are probably talking about raising the cap without raising payouts, It would make the system more progressive and many of the upper middle class would move against it.

[@wiseguy3696]

@@General8675 That would mean a complete redesigning of social security. All of the formulas would have to be changed. Even if they did raise the cap, most of the wealthiest people are already retired, which means they are paying no payroll tax, making the cap increase useless.

[@General8675]

@@wiseguy3696 I think that is all on the table here, we designed this system for when there were a higher proportion of younger workers in the system. Also, there are plenty of people pulling high wages who are well off and can be taxed beyond the cap. I don't know the math of it though. fundementally, the math of SS doesn't reflect our demographics and while the math of SS is changable, demographics isn't.

[@wiseguy3696]

@@General8675 Only 141 million people work as salary or wage workers. The wealthiest 9% would be paying more, meaning at most we could make up between $13-$50 billion of a $280 billion budget shortfall.

[@bigjigyeah]

You think that’s bad, have a look at what it’s like here in Japan

[@BOYVIRGO666]

I actually dont know the details of the japanese one but i know that with the japanese populations lobsided aging metrics its gotten bad. Too bad the Diet refuses to listen to basically every economic group and just open up immigration which would solve most of japans issues in like a year.

[@martinc.720]

How does that fix anything? In the US or in Japan?

[@BOYVIRGO666]

@@martinc.720 Increases the working population that pays into the social security system. Important in the US, 5 times as important in japan which has a job surplus(more jobs than people to fill them)

[@walteracevedo5105]

​@@BOYVIRGO666 Any system can recover in time, if people are accepting of needed changes. And some folks still won't change for nobody.

[@BOYVIRGO666]

@@walteracevedo5105 Except in japan the government refuses change which is causing long term problems. Japans employment and immigration issues have been well documented since the late 90s.

[@The_Chocolate_One]

Stuff like this is exactly why I’m trying to get out of here as soon as possible. The fact that they said everyone is in this together but yet nobody wants to come together is the biggest irony in life.

[@ilbgentyl]

Alot of people dont like social programs. The more responsible you are the less you tend to want someone else telling you how to handle your safety net.

[@Wary_Of_Extremes]

And where would you go?

[@CRWymer]

@@Wary_Of_Extremes I would like to know too. The US is not perfect but is the best we got. NO other country do the people have the rights that we have. Like freedom of speech. Or that though our healthcare cost a bit more the quality is higher along with every other country benefiting form the scientific research from here

[@bjornjoseph]

I am a naturalized citizen so I can bounce

[@awesomeferret]

Good luck. You'll need it. 40 years from now, you'll realize what you ran away from.

[@markeasley6149]

Never depend on social security. You need to fund your own retirement via IRA and 401k contributions so the money is tax advantaged and hopefully prevents you from touching it before you are old.

[@olliesears1963]

If wages increased, then the amount going into SS would increase too, right? Maybe minimum wage and wages in general should be part of this conversation

[@General8675]

Those wages also increase the benefits people get in the future. I'm not sure if the ratios work for it being a net positive to SS.

[@spydude38]

Part of the problem is that the population that is working as opposed to the number of those reaching retirement age has decreased over time. There are soon to be fewer people paying into Social Security than are drawing benefits. Short of getting more people working and paying into SS, there are only so many options available to shore it up. Raising the retirement age and raising the income payroll tax are two no-brainers. However, neither will be popular. They were not back in 1983, but Dems and Repubs did it together and saved SS to 2033.

[@dilthiumful]

Increasing minimum wage causes inflation which is one of the current issues we are currently facing. Since employers have to pay their workers more, they will raise the price of their goods. This devalues the currency and whatever amount people have saved before is worth less. Increasing wages is a very "not good" solution to the issue.

[@scifirealism5943]

​@@dilthiumfulinflation is an acceptable risk.

[@Swampy24945]

We could also intentionally lower life expectancy! If you're alive less time after you retire, less benefits will be wasted!

[@Y2B123]

It turns out Republicans have us all covered. Just gut any healthcare reform that would massively improve the health of Americans! They really know how to run the economy.

[@edheldude]

I think Americans are already lowering their life expectancy by being obese. It just increases other costs.

[@jannananaa]

They're already doing that. -_-

[@sepachortels6366]

Vacine

[@ri3sch]

It’s an omission to say that high income earners to pay more into the taxes as a solution. Capital gains have ZERO taxes for social security. It should be mentioned that capital gains should be subject to social security taxes as a solution

[@jamesn6458]

Right. The solution is to FURTHER EXPAND social security, not to phase it out over time. Imagine thinking that lol.

[@harvey66616]

To be fair, I think the video did make that statement, in a less direct way. I.e. they explained that "high earners" earn most of their money through investments, then they say one option is to have high earners pay more into the system, and they provided two examples of this: one was to remove the cap on taxed earnings (which would address regular salary income), and the other was to apply the tax to other income, i.e. investment income, i.e. capital gains. They may not have used the actual phrase "capital gains", but it's definitely what they were talking about.

[@Mike80528]

We cannot raise the amount of the tax. Low and middle-earners already have too much burden. The wealthy need to support the country that allowed them to accrue their obscene wealth or reap the circumstances...

[@spydude38]

Who pays the majority of the income tax collected by the IRS each year?

[@Sanguinaryyy]

It's baffling to me that the investment class get away with contributing so little to general society.

[@thetiredtrademarkseal]

Lobbying, pay offs to politicians, off shore tax shelters, global citizenship, etc. They can simply move their businesses abroad, change residence, and citizenship - then bye bye to their taxes and jobs altogether. The richest 1% do not have loyalties to a nation or state because they are as powerful as nations or states.

[@reecedrystek2992]

Contributing so little? There are literally the reason you have everything in your life that you do right now.

[@crusherven]

You're making a common mistake. The top 10% earners pay like 80% of of income tax revenue. And income tax is only like half the federal revenue.

[@Wary_Of_Extremes]

What are you talking about? Have you ever needed a loan for anything? Do you think everything would be better if people couldn't invest in companies they thought might do well?

[@awesomeferret]

Careful there calling it an "investment class". Unlike most other elements of class divide you can literally participate in the exact same way that billionaires do, even if you're poor. And now you can do it with a smartphone. I made thousands in the pandemic in my bedroom. You can too. The fact there there's no gatekeeping is a major thorn in your argument. When richer people invest, they make more profit because of scale. Poor people can make a much higher percentage of profit than billionaires depending on how they invest, but it's a lot less in returns since their portfolio is significantly smaller. Time for you to actually put effort into understanding things you are critical of.

[@mikesolomon2636]

On one hand Boomers have added significantly to the number of social security recipients recently. On the other hand their contributions and subsequent surplus investment provided a $2.9T surplus. I wouldn't be so quick to lay the purported upcoming insolvency on the backs of Boomers. They actually provided the added 20% benefit to more than just their generation.

[@RogerioPereiradaSilva77]

Higher life expectancy has been a major issue for social security systems all over the world: people live longer now so they collect more funds during their retirement. Add the economic gloom floating above our heads with fewer people with actual jobs so that they can provide for their families never mind fund other people's retirement and birth rates decreasing all around the world and it is not hard to see the likely outcome. Hint: it doesn't bode well for those of us looking forward to benefit from social security in the future. And before anyone says that they should privatize Social Security: Be careful with what you wish for. Pinochet essentially privatized Chile's equivalent of Social Security during his dictatorship and what is left of it today is a system that doesn't even provide the bare minimum that those retired people need to survive in their late years and the government had to dip into its pockets once again to complement their income.

[@spydude38]

Only if you think you are going to be able to retire and live comfortably off of just Social Security alone. Unless you plan on moving to Panama and living there, you will have a very difficult time here in the U.S. Keep in mind that Social Security was never meant to be your sole retirement strategy.

[@ultracapitalistutopia3550]

Same issue with Japan, but Japan has an additional challenge of higher life expectancy

[@RogerioPereiradaSilva77]

Actually, higher life expectancy has been a major issue for social security systems all over the world: people live longer now so they collect more funds during their retirement. Add the economic gloom floating above our heads with fewer people with actual jobs so that they can provide for their families never mind fund other people's retirement and birth rates decreasing all around the world and it is not hard to see the likely outcome. Hint: it doesn't bode well for those of us looking forward to benefit from social security in the future.

[@grmpEqweer]

...America allows at least some immigration. Immigration is a net benefit to the U.S. Japan doesn't allow much immigration, AFAIK.

[@seneca983]

Does Japan have a comparable government program?

[@meferswift]

@@grmpEqweer exactly this, right winger hates that slavery is profitable.

[@JohnDorian-j7x]

Actually... as any economics textbook will tell you: on a societal level, slavery is NOT generally profitable... or, at least not competitive (which isn't very intuitive).@@meferswift

[@AC-on4qe]

Maybe if the US didn’t keep sending billions of dollars overseas and reinvested tax revenue into America and Americans social security would be funded.

[@SandfordSmythe]

Nope, SS is financed through self contributions.

[@donaldstuckey9096]

Option 6 reform America's immigration laws at new workers and increase the number of people paying into the social Security trust fund.

[@Starcrash6984]

True. She didn't list _every_ option here. Another mentioned but not listed was "do nothing", which is actually the most likely outcome.

[@grmpEqweer]

Our immigration system desperately needs reform for moral reasons, but doing it right would result in a boost to the economy.

[@flyrehash5124]

good luck with that when the red half of the country wants to make AmeriKKKa white again

[@seneca983]

It might be even better to increase illegal immigrants who pay into the system but will find it difficult to ever draw benefits.

[@Starcrash6984]

@@seneca983 It's true that they "pay into the system" by paying local taxes on the goods they buy, but they don't pay into social security. That comes out of paychecks.

[@joink25]

I made $168K last year. I'm literally paying the same amount into Social Security as millionaires.

[@B1uSku1]

But you will also receive the same payouts as millionaires...

[@joink25]

@@B1uSku1 I don't believe I or anybody my age will see a dime of that money by the time we are able to claim it.

[@JBoy340a]

@@joink25 I thought that I would never receive. In fact, I was told that many years ago. My SS would pay my parent's retirement but needed to save myself for my retirement. So that is what I did. After all, the worst that can happen is I have my saving and SS.

[@ml6158]

Same problem in Canada, boomers took it all and there's not enough people to pay it back.

[@Jeff-q4u]

And Britain. They took it, wanna keep it, and wanna blame you for not doing what they did, when they did it. 🤷‍♀️

[@pathway4582]

It's happening all over the world. Boomers have completely ruined the system we live in and there is no hope of any improvement, because those who could change the situation heavily profit off of it.

[@Gasahlean]

@@Jeff-q4udoesn’t actions have consequences?

[@Effective_tool_of_Satan]

Not true. You have enough. You create your money

[@Effective_tool_of_Satan]

@@Jeff-q4u Not true, you control your own currency.

[@TrevorDuran3390]

Uhh... the retirement age WAS increased. To 67. And no one noticed

[@The-One-and-Only100]

I'm not going to pay into social security because I can use it for stuff that I need to pay in the here and now, like renting, food, bills

[@brianmeehan6235]

Love hearing the royalty free theme from the Two Cents PBS show - start saving for retirement hahaha

[@intercat4907]

In the Great Depression, we had thousands of families on the roads looking for day labor. We invented Social Security. I'd recommend reading all sorts of bizarre stuff about this ancient history, like Steinbeck's "Grapes of Wrath", or ... maybe you could ask a survivor. That's how ancient it ain't. Yes, you should pay attention.

[@ailo4x4]

Absolutely! How quickly people forget. SS is not a 'Benefit'. It is a contract that the earner pays into and receives an earned reward. Most importantly, it keeps people from re-living the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl horrors. As a retired US military member living in Europe, I am appalled that we, the largest economy in the history of the world, can't manage to have universal basic health care for our citizens. Much less a funded system that ensures our elders, those whom we are supposed to respect, have a quality of life in old age.

[@churblefurbles]

@@ailo4x4 Except that its not, its a ponzi scheme.

[@ailo4x4]

@@churblefurbles Of course it is if you care to look at it that way. Life itself is a ponzi scheme. We invest ourselves in our children because a., we love them, and b., they will take care of us when we get old. And with SS not only do our children take care of us, we invest in that care ourselves as we work. Why do we do it that way? Because not everybody has the luxury of having children capable of taking care of you. And as a society, we should be taking care of the vulnerable; the disabled, the elderly, and yes, even the poor as well. I guess it depends on what kind of person you are; generous and kind or selfish and miserly. It's up to you but I would seriously suggest you read your history and see why SS came to be. As for me, when given the choice, I choose to be kind even when it costs me.

[@tappajaav]

@@churblefurbles Except that it's not a ponzi scheme, as there is no foundation member reaping massive benefits

[@bminecreeper]

@@churblefurbleswhat ponzi scheme have you heard of that ran for nearly 100 years?

[@AriensRotokiller]

Raise the retirement age! The average predicted lifespan when Social Security was made was lower than the retirement age.

[@carverredacted]

This is something that nags at me as a disabled adult on the survivor's benefits and SSI. It's already so little money.

[@reecedrystek2992]

Look I feel for you but why is it everyone else's job to support you? Did your caretaker have life insurance? Did you save funds? Do you have a part-time job? A disability doesn't mean you can't work.

[@ricardobarahona3939]

@@reecedrystek2992Lack of basic solidarity showing.

[@userblame632]

@@reecedrystek2992but a lot of disabilities do mean you cant work? What if you live longer than you thought, and your retirement fund runs out. Should everyone make sure they have enough money to retire until 120? Is it ok that millions of elderly, disabled, and children starve on the streets? Seems like regression more than progression, sounds more like a devolving race than an evolving one. Ive worked with the elderly and so many suffer even on social security, I have no idea what theyd do without it.

[@reecedrystek2992]

@@userblame632 "What if you live longer than you thought, and your retirement fund runs out. Should everyone make sure they have enough money to retire until 120? Is it ok that millions of elderly, disabled, and children starve on the streets?" Welcome to problems that everyone faces, what makes you or anyone uniquely special? Everyone has challenges some certainly harder than others but if you view the world through a lense of evening out cosmic justice then you are simply not ever going to win or be satisfied. "But a lot of disabilities do mean you cant work?" Really? Name one? Short of having no arms, legs or a brain there is something that you can be doing. I inherently believe people have value and something to contribute to society, unlike you who apparently believes the littlest adversity and they are destined to live the life of a vegetable.

[@RedLetterDavid]

Woah woah woah. you listed two options but there’s three, and one of them is the correct option. 1. Increase taxes - no thanks 2. Lower benefits - absolutely not 3. Remove the cap. This should 100% be the option. If you make more money you still pay the appropriate % of tax. It’s absolutely messed up that up to $160k we all pay a % but after that it’s just…:free? Why is someone making 160k and someone making 500k and saying the same amount into the shared fund? That’s the entire solve.

[@B1uSku1]

If you remove the cap on contributions, then you also remove the cap on pay-outs. That is a zero sum solution...

[@xa1551]

What's wrong with lowering the benefits? People need to manage their own finances. I shouldn't have to pay for some old boomer who didn't save enough for retirement. Those are the same people who vote against student debt relief. Because socialist policies are great whenever they benefit boomers, but they'll cry and throw a fit as soon as they have to pay for anyone else. Give me a break.

[@MoMotivation0304]

By the time gen z or millennials get into SS....the great reset will have happened or Jesus would have come back. 🤷🏽‍♀️

[@chiplangowski3298]

Here is the truth about Social Security. Most of you won't like it. It is going broke because low wage earners are getting way too much in benefits when they retire. Their Social Security checks are too high (compared to what they contributed). Low wage earners need to pay more in. They just don't pay enough in to cover their benefits later in life. Even if the wage cap was totally removed, it would only cover about 56% of the shortfall.

[@spydude38]

This is far from "the truth". SS will not go broke anytime soon. The trust fund if not plussed up will not have enough money in it to pay all those who will be eligible to draw their benefit from it. This is directly impacted by the fact fewer people are working and having children who will grow up to enter the workforce and pay into the system. Congress addressed this in 1983 and they will do it again in 2032.

[@chiplangowski3298]

@@spydude38 - The math doesn't lie. You can't have people paying 12.4% of their income into a fund while they work, but then give them 90% of their average wages, adjusted for inflation, at their retirement. Even with the Millennials being a larger generation than the Boomers that are now retiring.

[@jamesc8839]

Social Security's asset pool is only made of US treasuries. If it was run like a Sovereign wealth fund (or at least like Alaska's Permanent Fund) we would never have an SS issue. the reason being is the rate of inflation and treasuries are tied, so if the fund returns above treasuries/inflation/benefit increases based on inflation, the fund won't run out of money.

[@spydude38]

Alaska's Permanent Fund Dividend doesn't do well unless the oil prices stay high. When they are low, it doesn't do as well. However, I like the way the Permanent Fund is managed.

[@tradeprosper5002]

Social security is not an investment fund, but an intergenerational transfer system. All of the SS taxes are currently being paid out to 50 million recipients. The Trust fund is just the extra we paid in over several decades and represents about $ 50k per retiree (or about two years of current payout).

[@jamesc8839]

@@tradeprosper5002 But it has to operate as a fund. Ever-increasing costs tied to population growth and inflation make it very difficult to have a positive surplus in the long run. Sure, short-term surpluses occur due to a large young workforce, but the moment you have a pause of that, it breaks or runs a loss. There are other investment models that run how SS should. One example is pension plans being the closest to it, but I think endowments are also another example of how the fund could operate to generate better returns for the investment people put into it. If it was simply a generational wealth transfer tool, there wouldn't be inflation-tied payments, no pay in, receive out calculations. it would be a straight line. the old population needs X billion this year. Therefore, all working class will be taxed, X so that there is no (major) surplus or deficit, just a tax like SUTA that can operate at a loss or surplus but then course corrects it by either charging a higher rate or lower rate respectively.

[@colin8696908]

Stop talking about SS It's some kind of disability program. It's a program that all Americans are entitled to and all Americans have paid into it at one point or another.

[@thecunninlynguist]

yeah I worry about my old age years. I have my own investments/savings/etc. but even then, I'm still worried.

[@elmateo77]

I'm just worried our increasingly liberal government will decide that me having money saved for retirement while other people who didn't bother to save are broke isn't fair and pass some ridiculous tax policy to "redistribute" my retirement savings to the parasites...

[@Xamry]

I don’t have much of anything but I sense I won’t live very long anyway I’d be flabbergasted

[@spydude38]

You are ahead of the game. Stay worried as that means you won't ignore the world around you and will be prepared to take action to stave off any issues. Knowledge is power.

[@stevencats7137]

Funny how many things could be fixed by taxing the rich

[@funwithfacts9413]

Taxing the rich destroys the businesses they create.

[@stevencats7137]

@@funwithfacts9413 lol who told you that? The rich? Or every news source that is … owned by … a rich person 🫤

[@MrChanw11]

​@@funwithfacts9413if your business can't be taxed more, its not a business that was destined to last. And btw we are talking about ultra rich corporations, not your mom and pop shop...

[@jobunaga4178]

​@@MrChanw11this is the dumbest take i have seen in awhile. have you looked at a financial statement in your life? what "ultra rich" companies have massive profit?

[@crusherven]

Funny how many people think we don't tax the rich.

[@maximusaugustus6823]

Because we keep giving free money to certain groups they do not wanna work.

[@bloop_official]

Vox: Social security in the US, Americans: **scratch their heads**

[@meferswift]

there are social security in the US where the people pay more than socialist and get less than when it's a capitalist. as they say, socialise the loss, capitalise the profit

[@andrewhardwick4480]

presented by Tmobile lol

[@alexsouvall7930]

We should be able to opt out

[@schmetterling4477]

So what would that do? The US government would still have to pay you because on average you would end up broke in your old age. Other countries don't allow you to opt out, either. They usually require you to pay into a privately owned savings account that you just can't access until you hit retirement age. One can't get around some sort of retirement nanny system because most people are not mature enough to take care of their own retirement. They need a nanny, whether we like it or not.

[@bruinsfan8522]

Ok, legitimate question for those who are upset by the rich "not paying their fair share": Why is it anyone else's responsibility to pay for your (or anyone's) retirement?

[@elizabethwenger9901]

Social security was initially meant to supplement pensions provided by the employer. A person was never supposed to be able to live off of ss

[@devcybiko]

In other words, let them eat cake… The problem is that employers stopped giving pensions, and the 401(k) plan was supposed to take over… But even the 401(k) plan is not designed as a retirement fund…

[@JBoy340a]

@@devcybiko worse is a 401K is voluntary. So many people spend the money instead of putting it into their 401K .

[@porterejohn]

There's no shortage of money or resources - but society only works when everyone (including business) pays their fair share towards the systems that allow them to exist. This isn't just an American problem, it's worldwide.

[@dwighthouse]

“There's no shortage of money or resources” - What are you talking about? All resources have shortages. Otherwise all resources would be free. I happen to want several tons of gold (just because), but the shortage of widely available gold means I would have to pay billions of dollars for such an amount. I can get several tons of dirt for a few hundred dollars, but even it is limited (hence why I have to pay those who own and/or transport it for me).

[@ParthPatel-lc7eq]

Alot of rich people dont recieve w2 pay and social security is only taxed on w2. This also means they dont recieve social secuirty when they retire since they never contributed.

[@purple_watermelon7326]

You've missed the biggest solution, that Australia implemented a mandatory 401k called superannuation that was taxed at a lower rate and had to be contributed to by the employer and the employee.

[@tonylarose4842]

Like a pension?

[@purple_watermelon7326]

​@@tonylarose4842not like a pension. Each person has an investment account that grows through mandated spending. When they need to draw down on it, the government does not pay any money.

[@Michael-du2fv]

a 401k is also subject to market prices meaning it could make money, or Lose money. With the current global economy that could be a big risk, depending how aggressive your 401k is managed.

[@grmpEqweer]

Can I ever stop working? Nope.

[@samfeldman1508]

I hope I can take off work early for my funeral?

[@Bellaa4578]

@@samfeldman1508😂😂

[@enigmaticunknown2862]

It's not running out but it won't be enough to live on. Save your own. Buy only what you need with no frills and save the rest. Don't spend your life pretending like you have more than you do. Trying to impress others will not pay your bills when you want to retire.

[@GRXMotorsPNW]

That was awesome advice! Finally a truthteller

[@jackMeought-fr8vl]

Why not cancel social security? Why are we taking money from the young and giving it to the old? Old people had their whole lives to build retirement, why do I have to pay them in my 20s as I want to start a family?

[@rome79735]

As long as there are politicians who treat SS like an ATM machine and or a piggy bank. This will be.

[@thiseye]

That's patently false

[@jobunaga4178]

only people ignorant of bond investment thinks this. the financial literacy in the country is atrocious. the fact that college educated people don't already know the content of this video is the reason why the government's finances is such a mess.

[@kewltony]

People really love myths.

[@spydude38]

Except they don't. Try harder.

[@rome79735]

@@thiseyeDon't think so? Then answer this, Why is Social Security in trouble?

[@josematamoros596]

3:55 tells you illegal or legal immigration is needed to make up the difference.

[@Satjr35031]

If they are legal they have a green card . Once they have that the USCIS starts the process for them to get their SS card.

[@andreawallenberger2668]

Raising the retirement age already happened here! It's 67 now. Check the facts, people: Full ss retirement age in the US for anyone born after 1960 is: 67 years of age.

[@oscarsanchez1003]

there is more than two choices, one that does not impact the daily American. Rather more financial surveillance on those who make multimillions annually, which is more than others lifetime earnings

[@crunchycannoli201]

Honestly, I hate social security. I wish that they would make it so you can opt out. Just give me my money back so I can invest it my way.

[@noneofyourbusiness3572]

👏🏼👏🏼💯 I agree with this. This should be an option for people. I doubt it’ll happen though.

[@ReedmanFL]

When my grandfather died, his monthly SS check was larger than his total lifetime contributions. He considered FDR to be the greatest man who ever lived. His pacemaker was paid for by Medicare, which he never contributed to. This is a simple demographics math problem --- but politicians are more interested in winning the next election than acting in the best interest of people 20 years from now. [My handyman only accepts cash and hasn't filed income tax in about 10 years (when he last worked on a payroll). When he went to the emergency room, he received a week of care and didn't pay $0.01].

[@vindex7309]

iirc, us government is currently obligated to pay out at least 75% of social security payments to recipients. Even if the reserve runs dry, social security won’t disappear. Now. It’s highly likely that legislation around social security could possibly be up for change as the reserve dwindles, but until the law is changed, this is how things will progress. What’s more concerning is that most people are severely underfunded for the later stages of their lives. As an aspiring financial planner, I want to be part of the advocacy for people to take their savings more seriously through out their lives. Even if it’s cursory knowledge, being aware of how much you make and how much you’ll need can go a long way - and the earlier you take this seriously the easier a transition you’ll have into retirement.

[@itakenaps]

yeah it's something like 40% of americans have less than 500$ saved in a savings account

[@spydude38]

Have you ever wondered why our primary and secondary education systems never teaches students how to invest in starting a business or to invest in their future? Its all by design.

[@ReadEphesians612]

Thank You! I'll be sharing this video.

[@Indi.a.B33ger.Viru.s.Nation]

Handing out money is never the solution Now we cannot even retire.

[@BigReputationBackup]

It’s going to trickle down any minute

[@richardhudson1243]

True, It has never been easier to understand how to build your money after retirement than it is right now with the inflation, when you may study and experience a completely variegated market passively by employing a successful portfolio-advisor. The impacts of the U.S. dollar's gain or fall on investments, in my opinion, are complex.

[@HoskinsShanellNicole]

True, It has never been easier to understand how to build your money after retirement than it is right now with the inflation, when you may study and experience a completely variegated market passively by employing a successful portfolio-advisor. The impacts of the U.S. dollar's gain or fall on investments, in my opinion, are complex.

[@dorkultra]

i'm still confused at why higher wage earners are allowed to pay less in taxes

[@Batham55]

Higher wage earners do pay more in absolute taxes. Percent may be different but numerous studies show that like 80% of taxes collected by the government is from the top 10-20% of tax payers in US.

[@reecedrystek2992]

THEY DON'T!!!

[@jojachow]

I know you're confused cause you stated something that's not true

[@cloudkitt]

In this particular case is because it wasn't billed as a tax (whether it works out to be one or not), but as a retirement fund. You pay in X, and get X back after you retire. You can't get back more than yoru percentage of that $168k number, so you don't pay in more than that.

[@elmateo77]

Higher earners don't pay less in taxes, the issue is that we have different tax rates for income from wages vs income from capital gains. The doctor getting paid $300 an hour is taxed at a much higher rate than the barista earning $20 an hour, but the billionaire earning $100 million a year from his investments is taxed at a lower rate than either of them. I've never understood why money you got for already having money should be taxed at a lower rate than money you worked for.

[@freeze1305]

As someone with poor genetics, knowing I won't live much beyond 70 and even if I do it will be very poor quality of life...the entire social security system enrages me. I will NEVER get even half as much out as I pay in.

[@basedlibertarianz910]

sounds like a ponzi scheme to me.

[@EveloGrave]

Would also help if companies actually paid their employees living wages.

[@CaioMGA]

gives a number. how much is a living wage?

[@reecedrystek2992]

Blah, Blah, Blah. People in Africa live on a dollar a day. It is in the commercials.

[@quietus13]

Option 6: reduce or eliminate benefits for wealthy retirees. Someone sitting on a $10 mil portfolio doesn't need to collect $3000 a month from uncle Sam.

[@andrews68]

A pyramid scheme is all ss is… problem is now it’s an inverted pyramid

[@laiswith2dots]

So, there is a regressive tax when it comes to social security? How backwards is the US??

[@phftheebonidiot637]

Yes. Yes.

[@mrjgilbert]

Yes, it’s a regressive tax and it’s absurd. And then the only “solution” politicians and media talk about is making people work until they are almost 70 before collecting a benefit! It’s awful and backwards. Side note: I saw your comment elsewhere about “the biggest shoulders carry the most weight” being a fair system. I could not agree more. And I appreciate you saying it.

[@user-fx5sw1cn7j]

benefits are scaled to payments so if you don't have a cap on taxes, you don't have a cap on benefits and the program becomes similarly unsustainabl

[@Zelp789]

Quit voting for the GOP. They want to cut SS.

[@July.4.1776]

@@user-fx5sw1cn7j…. The way the bend points in the formula work the top earnings only pay back a small percentage vs those on the low end.. This would certainly help to close the gap in funding.

[@raedwal]

Tax the rich 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@spydude38]

Of course. How much do we need to tax the rich to fix the shortage? You have no clue do you?

[@theunit5939]

They have no problem printing money though and sending it to ukrain

[@kk-gc1ii]

This is why immigration is so important to countries that use this system

[@mustardmarauder9439]

Lots of immigrants work under the table jobs and are usually a take more out of government benefits than they put in

[@MarcoMartinsM]

Increase Jeff Bezos alike tax by a small percentage and resolve that problem. In other words, tax the rich :)

[@TheMagicJIZZ]

Jeff bezos owns 8% of Amazon and this would mean he wouldn't sell his stock( he founded Amazon remember it's his shares he invented for free) He only pays capital gains if he sells but he could use a loan and never pay and when he dies the bank would receive the loan interest from shares he secured

[@mlynto]

You would need 1000 Bezos to make a dent in SS shortfall.

[@spydude38]

You do realize there isn't enough to be gotten to solve the problem by "taxing the rich"? That is just what ignorant people shout out at the top of their lungs, who have no real understanding of how to solve economic issues.