Is this INSANELY Expensive Lens Worth it? | Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L

[@HigherAEM]

Excellent review! I own this lens. Like you said, it’s perfect for landscape and architectural photography. It’s also great for portrait photo. You can create so many great shots using the ultra wide angle. Also, if you shoot in low light, that 2.8 aperture comes in CLUTCH ! Its definitely worth owning

[@photographerimages]

Yep, maybe will get a filter on mine for the R5 someday, if you think the lens protection factor is much better than inage wuality differance. So you like the 15-35 better than the 14-35? Very nice great video BTW. Question: I use to use a UV filter on my lenses, but I haven’t been doing it for years. Maybe I should go back to doing that especially for lots of my photography with RF 15-35mm and RF 70-200 2.8, because you’re outdoors. What do you suggest? Travel can be demanding on gear. Do you use them anyways? Can you tell any difference when you use a UV filter or not? With the gear I use would you always use one for lens protection? Which one would you use for these lenses? Or dont use one, if quality gets compromised.

[@StoneyTonight]

you needa add hashtags for the algorithm good stuff bro

[@JosephMartin]

I’ll give it a shot!

[@jermanoid]

Its on sale tight now for $1900, go forth and acquire it!

[@JosephMartin]

Go forth!

[@kevin-sj3wt]

from my circle of friend who like photography, no one shoot canon RF

[@zegzbrutal]

That's just your social circle....

[@kevin-sj3wt]

@@zegzbrutal exactly and i prefer good used lens nowadays, and its hard to get second RF lens

[@pappadudat]

​@@zegzbrutal facts. Circles don't mean nothing...

[@goodtimezproductionz]

@@pappadudatcircles are for squares