It’s Time To Put A 3D Scanner In Your Toolbox

[@davidwbrower]

In manufacturing we saved a bunch of money on targets by attaching them to thin plexiglass strips with magnets for large metal surfaces. We could re-use them for other projects down the line (as long as it's not the same scan since it'll confuse the software). Helps with clean up too since you don't have to pull off as many individual targets!

[@joebrodie]

Great idea! Why not small sheets of transparency paper (like the old school college projectors) with a bunch of targets on them? Not great for deep curves, but you could place a bunch of sheets on a hood and a few where there is more difficult geometry.

[@ezanchi5422]

Wouldn't the depth of the plexiglass mess up the measurements/dimensions of the final result?

[@TokyoChopSquad]

@@joebrodie Oh man, I forgot about the Elmo projectors!

[@dsfs17987]

@@ezanchi5422 no, it uses the centers of the reflective sticker for reference, the flat surface data gets tied to the points, wherever they are (protruding from that flat surface), the software simply cannot tell where it is when it is looking at a flat, that is all there are options in that software to use texture of the flat to align itself, but a car paint for instance has no texture, just color (simply speaking), but that is quite unstable, it may lose position and again you need to start over, and if there are not enough reference points, it won't stitch the scans together later, so - use points :)

[@joeofloath]

Does blutack/silly putty work? Would be convenient to store the targets squished up into a ball!

[@rowanw5912]

Blender > File > Import > [your filetype] > Right panel blue wrench icon > Add Modifier > Decimate. I like collapse, and for your purposes and a sub millimeter scan you can go well under 10% without losing much detail (you want to type in the value, dragging the slider around can crash). Always a nice feeling to watch that polycount in the bottom right drop and the fps go up. Blender modifiers are non-destructive, so removing it will undo the changes. You can export with File > Export > [your filetype], just make sure "Apply modifiers" is on. You can also apply the modifier destructively with the dropdown next to "Decimate".

[@Sn0w1981]

Finally a use for the dust my projects gather!

[@SuperfastMatt]

When I bought the Viper, I told the guy "Don't wash it! I need that dirt for scanning."

[@Sn0w1981]

@@SuperfastMatt Haha! They'll soon charge extra for that now!

[@rickjoyce637]

@@SuperfastMatt I’d like to learn Fusion360 so I can do something like your Jaaaaag EV conversion. Do you have any recommendations for classes(paid or otherwise)?

[@paint4pain]

I used geomagic studio instead of meshlab a few years ago and the best feature was the surface finding, you paint a part of the mesh and click "Find surface plane" or "Find cylinder" super usefull once you bring it into solidworks.

[@gabriels.713]

Isn't geomagic obscenely expensive

[@rigon63]

​@@gabriels.713 Yes lol it is

[@gabriels.713]

@@rigon63 It's the exact reason I indefinitely postponed some of my projects lol

[@gabriels.713]

@@jheins3 Holy shit, I am totally going to check this out! EDIT: Damn it looks like it's only a free trial and after that is just a mesh viewer or something. I haven't actually tested just yet but am looking at comparison videos

[@jheins3]

@@gabriels.713 They have played around with the licensing since they were bought out by Zeiss, however, I believe it says free trial - but its like a year or more, like any other student license (Solidworks, Ansys, Etc.)... and you can always re-register.... I am not sure though as I haven't used it in awhile - but basically it has all the functionality the Pro license has, minus the functionality for production/batch scanning/inspection. Its great for one-off jobs or quick and dirty reverse engineering.

[@kleingarrett55]

Man I have been loving your videos! As a long time CAD user and engineer with dry humor it really get me.

[@kleingarrett55]

Bad grammar included for engineering degree verification

[@gsmdo8836]

Another excellent example of a complex subject explained simply - many thanks Matt 👍

[@virgulinoferreira3472]

The video is six minutes old, and it shows your comment as 12 hours ago?

[@SuperfastMatt]

Patreon supporters get videos the day before they come out.

[@jcorkable]

@@SuperfastMatt man, I wish I wasn’t poor

[@blackfrost273industries4]

​@@SuperfastMatt allhailthralgoryhthm, still love your brain and videos. You've given a good time and good ideas. Although I'm about four decades from being capable of 3d scanning, I've learned a lot and this one is by far, the most relevant data filled ever. I mean, EVER. You've single handedly answered all of my questions you cannot Google or Facebook groups. Those are partly negative gatekeeping on what I've found. So yes, fresh air. Much so

[@KO-pk7df]

What he said!

[@miked7728]

I don't have the skills, time, money, or even a garage to do any of this stuff.. yet here I am, endlessly fascinated by it. So cool.

[@sully.varnadoe1472]

Blender has come a long way for remeshing and working on objects, I feel like it might be a better fit than mesh lab for a lot of people.

[@copperthedergy]

i was gonna comment this, its really good in the case of mesh decimation, as its a mesh modifier that you can undo and tweak all you want

[@thumbtak]

I know a guy who used an RV as a mesh lab

[@robertnicholls9917]

How would you rate Autodesk Inventor against Blender?

[@Robinlarsson83]

@@robertnicholls9917 They are not the same kind of tool, not at all really. Yes, both creates 3D models, but in completly different ways. Inventor is actual 3D CAD, professional level at that, and Blender is, well, not CAD (no, not even with the CAD addons). Comparing an apple and a banana is more similar :P

[@andybrice2711]

​@@robertnicholls9917 They're very different. Blender is a mesh-based programme better for amorphous sculpting, animation, and VFX. Inventor is solid-body parametric CAD, better for engineering parts. Fusion 360 is essentially a budget version of Inventor though.

[@anomamos9095]

There are perforated film sheets that are used to cover windows as sun shades and for printing advertising on that cover windows. As they are electrostatic they are reusable and getting some printed with dots would solve several problems. Also as a light source using incandescent or halogen bulbs connected to a battery to avoid flicker would improve lighting.

[@drkastenbrot]

drawing any random non repeating pattern on the sheet is all you need. the scanner needs to be able to match what the two cameras see.

[@andybrice2711]

That sounds like a good idea. Maybe even better would be lengths of electrostatic tape covered in tracking markers. So you don't have to worry about it creasing in areas of compound curvature.

[@bobulele]

All hail the algorithm.

[@Noise-Bomb]

The algorithm shall prevail!

[@jonathanwilcox2003]

​@@Noise-Bomb 😂😂😂

[@jonathanwilcox2003]

😂😂😂😂

[@gkraker04]

Hail!

[@DC_DC_DC_DC]

Heil!

[@LandbO1984]

A pro tip: Try change one ceiling light to another shade. The processing runs smooth afterwards For the floor, many scan tools has the options to set IDs for objects and subs. Select the floor id and hit select all, and delete. Remember to cover the floor with a color you dont have on the scanned object or a color that is not near the floor

[@jesscneal]

Mesh Mixer works well for reducing mesh size/poly counts. I've been using a metrology grade Creaform Handyscan 700 for years. It's good to about 3-4 thousandths and the price reflects that. Absolutely indispensable tool for me. Scanning is one of the services I offer and I also scan my own projects. Super cool technology.

[@FG-418]

Glad to see a real hands on review. I borrowed a 3D System Sense which was about 350$ 10 years ago and struggled a lot with large scans. I shopped again last year, just to see that the equivalent in performance was still 350$. At a 1000$ it still a bit above what I wanted to pay but at least the market is moving toward something actually usable on a car in a garage and affordable.

[@gerikbensing]

I may have to finally buy one of these! I used one back in university 10 years ago or so and the teacher I borrowed it from ended up building a whole semester’s lesson plan around the scan I made of our college’s founder’s statue. Scan object, work with scan, 3D print, use model for machining, make vacuum formed parts, etc. I’ve got several projects around my Durango I’d like to do but keep putting off due to the complexity of the measurements I’d need to take. I may finally be able to buy my way out of this predicament without breaking the bank too horribly!

[@peterscott7384]

I don’t think I’ll ever need or use one of these scanners. But I couldn’t look away. You have a way of keeping us hooked to the screen Matt. Well done. Love the video

[@eitantal726]

it's all fun and games, until you wake up one day and decide you want to copy a car

[@JL-pc2eh]

I don't even use my 3D printer enough for what I payed for it. But having it is just pretty usefull. I guess same goes for the scanner. I hate messuring stuff just to notice I forgot to messure one thing when I am in a CAD program xD Also it would be pretty useful to see dimensions and collisions in CAD. I often have a part right beside me so I can compare messurements just that I don't make a part way to strong/weak or big/small when it isn't necessary.

[@sungear]

So many youtubers ignore safety requirements. I appreciate your good example by protecting your hair with the jeep branded shower cap. You may consider a Review of dodge or Chevy shower caps. Many of us are anxious for the results.

[@dsp4392]

Absolutely love the dry humor. I was already a fan of scanning stuff for CAD, did plenty of it when I built my custom ebike, but I really appreciate the foot spray tip. Much better than the super expensive 3d scanning sprays and less messy (probably) than my current method of sprinkling flour on the objects.

[@107cdb]

This is better 3D scanning training than everything Zeiss offers combined.

[@enemyspotted2467]

Their training is terrible, but not nearly as bad as their customer service. I have that hotline number memorized. Excellent machines once you figure out how to use them

[@earthwindflier]

Using the Einscan scan software, you can dictate a plane (like the floor) at any point in the scan process, and tell the software to ignore it. It saves having to mess with it after the fact. Great vid btw. I have the HX, and am an Einscan devotee. Great product with great support.

[@przyna]

what do you do with it to justify the cost if you don't mind me asking?

[@earthwindflier]

@@przyna I scan professionally for restoration and preservation.

[@t1188-k9l]

I use monofilament fishing net with markers stuck back to back at the nodes of the net in a random pattern. Easy to reuse, barely shows up on the scan, works in a variety of orientations. Thanks for the great video.

[@011bluedrag]

as an option for the targets, try using a chalk pen and just drawing squiggles on the surface, this was suggested to me by the manufacturer of a very expensive 3d scanner that we were trailing at my work, its also a lot cheaper than buying tracking dots

[@mrjed]

for the bodywork, I would be interested in a painters tape lattice as a makeshift set of markers, unless they are more than just visual markers, I think that might give enough points of interest for the scanner

[@directoradamg]

Was about to say the same thing! Painters tape will hopefully at the very least, break up the solid surface with enough points of interest to create a great scan.

[@SAD-MART]

Coming from someone with a painfully underpowered Creality Lizard- the secret sauce is wet newspaper. Drape large, unchanging surfaces (like body panels) in the stuff and it's hands down the best way to catch them. The Lizard has the eye size of a credit card, so unless you're practically wrapping the car in tape, it's not enough.

[@ThaJay]

@@SAD-MART Loads of high contrast detail on a thin sheet! Smart.

[@directoradamg]

@@SAD-MART That's a super smart idea!!!

[@mrjed]

@@SAD-MART whoa this is a great idea tbh; all the letters and symbols would work for sure

[@Ben_dillon]

Glad to see making for motorsports is getting some much deserved attention

[@jeffharrison5265]

Great review! I purchased that scanner last month and love it. Using to make unobtanium parts for my 72 Jaguar XJ12. Like you mentioned the specs are demanding and I had to get a Dell gaming laptop, but worth it. Great time to be in the garage indeed.

[@Freight_Train]

unobtanium...love it

[@hyperformancellc]

I have been using 3d scanners since 2015. I purchased an artec eva and watched as the hardware stayed the same but the software just kept getting better. Same with my Artec Leo now. completely wireless and battery powered. I started scanning to use to make bucks for sheet metal shaping. One thing I do have to say is that I have never scanned something for someone else and had them be happy with it. Even when scanning for free. Everyone expects magic and you give them an STL and they just don't know what to do. Even people I consider experienced CAD modelers. They expect a parametric model but don't want to pay for the time of doing that. So I would like to add the recommendation that this is something you do for yourself and don't expect to make money scanning things for other people unless your wanting to do a lot of solid modeling for free. Using scans in CAD changes your processes and changes your thinking so just don't expect other people to be able to understand.

[@JeremyDN]

Most people don't understand what these scanners are capable of honestly. They except an exact replica, with no errors and that hardly ever happens. We use Faro Arms at my work and they work really well, but they also have limits. I usually just scan a part I need and then use that as a base to model the real part. Little bit easier then measuring everything.

[@hyperformancellc]

@@JeremyDN agreed. Im looking at a wireless cmm to help fill in the gaps with a point cloud model to help bring a better precision to bolt hole locations and add more quantitative data to my scans.

[@lgrfbs]

Thanks for the recipe for the scanner spray mix, this is the first time I've heard of an easy way to powder an object for 3D scanning. THANK YOU!

[@garyparker2262]

Attach trailing arms to axle with forward mounts fitted. Place axle under car in desired ride height position. Remove anything in the way to enable trailing arms to attached to body at the desired angle. Do the same with Panhard rod. Run axle through full bump travel, left, right, both. Remove anything that fouls. Reinforce and strengthen altered areas and mounting points. Stop for lunch and have a nice cup of tea.

[@RocketkidDesigns]

Wow thanks for this video and you just earned yourself a subscribe. I have just spent the better part of two weeks trying to figure out how to reverse engineer the front of an airplane from 3D scans with the same scanner, trying to get it to a solid model so I could work on it. This helped me realize I can work with the scan without turning it into a complete model. What a relief, I never would have finished.

[@nickmagerl]

I've got that $10grand scanner to use with my $5grand computer. You would think I could afford the scanner spray at $40 a can 😅. Thank you for the baby powder mix I will be trying soon! Also have you tried the reflectors using magnet backings? Makes life allot easier.

[@danialhowe9814]

anything you can do to eliminate or reduce cost of consumables makes the whole thing sweeter

[@CraigHollabaugh]

Love your comment about not measuring anything anymore, just scan it. My measurement skills suck and look forward to using an einstar (bought one a couple days ago)

[@LearnEverythingAboutDesign]

Great video Matt! at 6:41 where you mention wanting to "undo" the last 30s. If you pause the scan you can use the cleanup tools in ExScan to select and delete portions of the points. this works pretty well when you get that junk data however if you are using markers or hybrid alignment, i found that the markers stay which can be troublesome. I have noticed, like the deck lid on the viper, with big flat areas if you get double markers these end up needing to be deleted and just redo the entire scan in that project.

[@Map71Vette]

I've been eagerly anticipating this video. This has been on my gift list for a while now. Seems like the best bang for the buck scanner out there today that makes any kind of sense for a tinkerer at least.

[@BuilderCreator]

Hey Matt, thanks for sharing your impression of the the scanner. As I'm often doing very similar work as yourself, I've considered getting a high end scanner again, but instead stick with all the little work arounds we do to collect data. Even $1000 is a bit much for a tool that collects more dust than baby powdered axles, but your video may have nudged me. If I just had a third project going, I'm sure I could justify it- and the algorithm would also then love me!

[@johnswilley6764]

I came for the scanner, then stayed for the info, and presentation! Great job BTW; also subscribed. Thanx!

[@monkeybarmonkeyman]

I'll probably never get or use one of these scanner, but the software/hardware geek inside me says "Wow.. it is a pretty amazing time to be working in a garage!" Thanks for this video - and I am so looking forward to all your content this year.

[@poltdesigns]

So one thing I have been doing when scanning full cars in flat areas, I will throw a large cloth near the part and start scanning. The scanner uses that cloth almost like a dot and the tracking is unbelievable. (Even better than using the dots tbh lol). Afterwards I delete the cloth bits from the scan, do that a few times slowly offsetting the areas of the cloth and the parts I did and did not scan. Really loved the results and the speed it did it in!

[@artemtsvetkov3655]

Love the video, 100% agree! I recently added CR-01 Scanner to my toolbox.

[@inebriatedengineering6288]

It's funny when you notice that Brilliant tells their advertisers to mention in the beginning of every video that it's sponsored by them and that 'we'll get to that later'.

[@sparkie5571]

It's better for most people since we all know we all don't like ads in videos. At the end of the video is a great compromise

[@FiftySixishTV]

Putting the sponsor at the start and it's getting skipped, no two ways about it

[@wills5482]

Sponsorblock baby

[@FiftySixishTV]

@@wills5482 time is money

[@ShainAndrews]

There is no such contractual obligation.

[@furian7626]

I remembered this video from when I first saw it a year ago. Someone asked me about this exact topic this morning. So I sent them your video. All hail the algorithm.

[@adamlee9252]

Matt - you are in a position to really help the Viper community out if you have a bit of time and want to play with your new toy some more! The headlights on a Gen1/2 Viper are no longer in production and used units are selling for upwards of $5000 each. The community really needs someone with your expertise and a tool like yours to upload CAD scans of the lenses and housings to a freely available source so it can get the ball rolling on reproductions. Want to become a living legend and help us all out?

[@MadLadCustoms]

Matt, appreciate your in depth videos on your endeavors. This is the exact thing all of us do and you put it all out there for free, much respect can't wait to see the final on the build! 🤟

[@ferrettankror1]

ah super cool! Also just a heads up for everyone wanting to do the same (what I use in all of my builds) is phot scanning, tends to be accurate within 1/8th of an inch across the vehicle :).

[@Meoiswa]

For large surfaces like the back side of the viper, painter's tape lines that break up the shape into non-repeating patterns help a lot! Just lay down strips of tape at uneven spacing, lengths, and angles. I imagine this'll work even better with your fantastic talc powder alcohol spray!

[@Acheiropoietos]

Thinking aloud, you can get alcohol markers / screw location stamps, perhaps you could even use potato stamps to get those flat area markers. Just use a thicker powder paste: dip and stamp, dip and stamp. Any use?

[@mitchellsnider4198]

I was just telling my wife the other day that this is probably the best time in history to be a gearhead engineer with a garage. Eventually module communication and safety standards/insurance will make it all too expensive again. Right before we mutually agreed that my drivetrain swap on our Acadia is taking too long in spite of CAD/Laser cutting/3D scanning speeding me up, and decided to just buy an FJ cruiser... Those 3 things are not enough to beat the planning fallacy unfortunately! Thankfully she has permitted me to continue slowly puttering away at the twin turbo LS quattro Acadia.

[@mbgmadbull1141]

you mean to tell me I can now scan my 2008 toyota Corolla into assetto corsa now for around a thousand dollars? dude this is the most badass thing I've seen and need this now

[@kajpaget3180]

This is aaaammmmmmzzzzingggg. ❤ So much big huge yes, this does tie CAD and life together. Together the parts are strong. I am a CND plumber, and do the house renovation stuff. I'm getting one and see if it can scan my house. I'll renovate it and see if I can not use a tape measure, I hope so!❤ Fusion 360 like right thank you free, I could only dream I could use CAD as powerful, now this affordable percussion point seeker saying exactly were it all is❤

[@Rydn]

hey, to reduce the mesh you can pop the model in blender and use a modifier to decimate as well, with the benefit of selecting the amount of desired reduction and see the result before applying.

[@ThePepsicola1995]

Not sure whether someone else has already said it or you have figured it out yourself already, but with meshlab you can duplicate a mesh within the same project, if you then ruin it with a polygon decimation you can just continue with a previous mesh. This is also handy for when you want to easily compare smoothing algorithms or how much a decimation impacts the model

[@BlackOpsTSI]

Matt, great videos, great info. Any chance you would consider doing a video on how to get from the scan to something you can use to build off. I understand a majority just getting it from a mesh to building off the mesh. Keep up the good work!

[@johnvanness2425]

You're my hero, just thought you should know. Keep up the great work and great energy so I can live vicariously through you.

[@Benautodesign]

My Einscan H is the best tool I bought ! Roll cage, chassis protection for rally car, and even frame straightness control on a damaged car !

[@badlighting]

It’s really cool to see these scanners becoming more common! The scanner on the iPhone may not be the best, but it’s definitely a nice thing to have

[@flanflanjp_]

On objects/parts you know are symmetrical, it might help to do a mirror on that axis to fill in detail you missed on one side that you got on the other. You could even ask the software to combine your mirrored scan to fill it all in.

[@wrighty338]

Had a scan done with one of those 10k einstar's and it came out baller, gonna be really useful for cadding my project

[@herrunsinn774]

13:22 "If you're anything like me, and I know I am..." (You are welcome for the slight joke improvement. No charge.) 😅🤣😂

[@troycongdon]

This is so cool. Here I am trying to teach myself speeds and feeds for manual machining so I can work in the past and you are working in the future.

[@iflifewaseasy]

For targets, I'll use all sorts of random stuff. Erasers, nuts, Legos, then attach with modelling clay. I love your review of this scanner, too! It does seem finally approachable. I've got a next engine scanner with rapidworks.

[@gusser2121]

you had me chuckling all the way through... love your vids man...

[@poprawa]

All three of my engines that i considered working on have cylinders out of round by a lot, thanks for tips how to avoid complex measurement - saved me a lot of time!

[@Shoopadawhoopa]

Another idea to add targets is to use a fishing net and attach the targets to it. throw it onto the object and scan. the net should be easily removable as it doesn't touch the object in a lot of places, but you still get great tracking/aliging.

[@MakingforMotorsport]

Thanks for the mention Matt… great video as always! 🚗

[@Xsiondu]

What about using glitter body spray on the large flat panels? Will the scanner see the glitter flecks as useable targets? Or is that pushing to far into the reflective surfaces bad region of it's capabilities?

[@cernejr]

Or a masking tape with numbers/patterns/2D-barcodes? This should not be such a big challenge, it seems. A couch potato talking here, not a maker :).

[@chrstphrr]

Practically, it won't work. But glitter over S.F.Matt's babypowder in rubbing alcohol, would be a geeky way to make a tribute 3d scanning video to the Something Experience's "German Sparkle Party". Someone MUST DO THIS.

[@Xsiondu]

@@chrstphrrwhat's that‽ A Rabbit hole? Let's go!

[@Xsiondu]

@@chrstphrr ohh shit! That was great. Thanks for mentioning it, I can see your vision I agree somebody should do that.

[@chrstphrr]

@@Xsiondu I really hope it's Matt that chooses to do it. It would be as epic as his ham sammich episode. He could even wear a shower cap. Though... I'll have to give a go at glitter on my next scan of VW parts, and play that song in the background as a warm-up. 😂

[@kidenscruton1923]

Great video makes me want to buy a 3d scanner that I don’t have enough time to use and can’t afford, Keep the videos coming!

[@martinjones4776]

4:00 Top tip, thanks

[@Oleg-oe1rc]

Lol, just recently found your channel and this video perfectly answers what I was wondering from watching the offraod viper build. Seen a lot of these scanners before and this is the first I'd seriously consider, also doesn't hurt that I just built a tiny PC with RTX3090ti and i7-12700k. Glad I subscribed, keep up the good work!

[@austrian_s60r64]

U can buy magnetic targets for the einstar, about 150 usd for 500 of them so about 10 times more than normal sticky ones

[@existentialselkath1264]

For car bodywork and large flat surfaces, are there any competent budget options at all? It'd be insane if an iPhone lidar was the best option when that's got a whole phone built around it.

[@fischmanchu]

htc recently announced self tracking modules for vr body tracking you could attach one or two to this so it could track its self in 3d space

[@mr_jag_]

i recommend sticking targets on some kind of small magnets, it makes them reusable and easy to get them off the part after scanning

[@lavachemist]

Sorry for snooping, but I noticed the Tele style guitar with a P90 near your desk. Very cool!

[@RealDGoodwin]

A tip that I’ve seen is talking painters tape, laying out strips, then putting the reflective dots along it. This way you can lay down say 4’ strips of tape with all your dots, then just pull it off when you’re done. No muss no fuss… or something like that

[@PaulG.x]

If you use sodium bicarbonate as the "white powder" ,it's soluble ,so you can just hose it off after. You can spray the surface with water and sprinkle the powder over the damp surface ,or you can spray a strong solution and wait for it to dry.

[@chrstphrr]

Also, it's salty tasting, for those who can't resist licking the part off.

[@sirseven3]

I wonder if you would benefit from trying to scan with turning the lights off and using IR to avoid the paint reflections

[@nostalgicmusicbox]

When I played GTA San Andreas, the modded Buffalo with adjustable lift was my favorite vehicle. For switching on an off road. I know it was a "Mustang" but looks like you're making a better, real life version of one of my dream vehicles!

[@Hoggaforfan]

There is round flexible magnets you could use to set targets on, good for reusing

[@owensparks5013]

Excellent video. How viable is "garage enthsiast level" cnc plasma cutting of steel? Being able to have prototype or better parts from scan to CAD to holding in your hand "now" sounds wonderful.

[@michaelkrenzer3296]

A CROSSFIRE table is about $1300, plasma cutter from Primeweld with machine torch about $500, sufficient VERY dry air so lets call it $100 for the air dryer, $300 for a good used high volume compressor. Now, do you about 60-70 amps of 220V with two outlets in you work space? If not, compressor needs to be 110V so bigger tank and slower recovery time. There are DYI solutions for the plasma table similarto the DIY solutions for large/giant format printers that certainly are cheaper.

[@owensparks5013]

@michaelkrenzer3296 Appreciate the info. Thanks. 👍

[@grumpyoldguy4817]

I have watched a few of your videos before this one, but I have to say, the "safety gear" earned a sub. Keep up the great work.

[@SubTroppo]

Your comment reminds me of Brexit. Food workers in the UK wear/wore items that looked like shower-caps, whereas in other European countries with (I assume). the same regulations did/do not. From that, again I assume, that Britain's main problem with the European Union was that the British followed the rules and the rest of Europe did not. ....Pretty wild assumptions but there you are. Such things are those which political careers are based upon.

[@bencevarga6304]

I wonder if the scanner works while it's stationary, and the part is moved around. One could make a jig, with a turntable, from which a part could be hung with an extra thin fishing line, and turned around in front of the scanner.

[@Warnoo55]

Yes the scanner works fine when stationary with the part revolving on a turntable

[@bencevarga6304]

@@Warnoo55 thanks!

[@someusername121]

When I was looking into whether buying an "entry level" scanner was worth it, the conclusion seemed to be the iPhone lidar scanner is better / more reliable anyways because it already has top tier hardware and software to deal with photogrammetry and post processing.

[@jonwebb9261]

Great video, you're totally right about this tech being accessable and good enough to be worth it now. Also, dry shampoo is cheap and very easy to use as developer spray

[@willofthemaker]

This is fantastic. Dont know how i havent seen your channel before, its right up my alley. Subbed!

[@ShiroZ31]

I have a creality cr-01 and haven't had time to mess around with it much.

[@theianmce]

Totally agree, there has never been a better time to be a mechanical engineer / designer!

[@ryanokeefe12]

Use meshmixer instead of mesh labs. It's still not as intuitive as it should be, but at least it has undo and also has sliders and a live preview of what you're adjusting before you apply the actual change.

[@TheJcman72]

Nice to see that we use the same quality content!

[@bazilwreckerloughead]

I need one of those...the shower cap. I noticed in one part you said; "You're smart, you'll figure it out." Very brave assumption sir, very brave indeed.

[@rigon63]

Love the timing of this, I just got my einstar two weeks ago

[@moki123g]

I wonder if you could use a water based paint marker for calibration dots?

[@jimurrata6785]

Dry erase marker???

[@BadlandIndustries]

My einscan will be be here tomorrow. Thanks for your perspective on this unit!

[@temporalmadness3756]

Good thing i've just got my RevoPoint Range yesterday.. hope it's up to the task..

[@FeralPreacher]

May the algorithm be with you, young car builder.

[@richardberryhill718]

Really helpful video report, covered so much in clear but easy to grasp detail. I feel like I could go buy one and use it without near the effort of trying to understand “instructions” or figuring it out myself. Thanks!

[@RichardBetel]

I wonder: would putting the scanner on something like a camera slider rig help in any way? movement would be smoother, linear, repeatable, etc. I guess I'm wondering how much scanner shake affects the scanner.

[@chrstphrr]

Software matters more. The hardware for most of the prosumer grade 3D scanners is pretty much where we need. Current software bundled with the prosumer scanners are not letting the prosumer scanners perform to their capability. The software is years behind the high 5 to 6 figure professional scanners, but improving. The scanner I'm using, the 4.x version software tracks badly, unless surface and lighting are ideal. And even then... it can drift off for no reason, or do that dreaded "two calipers" problem SFMatt showed. Same hardware, new beta 5 software, the tracking is vastly improved. You can be coffee addled, shaky ... loose tracking, and it recovers better than the previous program. The only change was software. Well, and the software requiring a good GPU. But, this was to be expected. Matt didn't really mention his scan sizes, but some of my small hand sized part scans are turning up as 50-250 mb scan projects. You need a number crunching GPU for that much data. It'll be interesting times with these scanners. I'm just hoping that the software improvements to truly match and pair with the scanning hardware means existing scanners improve, and have a longer life. Though, I'll settle for improved hardware AND improved software both, at the $500 price point Matt mentioned, too.

[@kevinblakely2144]

Thanks for taking my suggestion from one of your earlier videos Matt!

[@FurryWrecker911]

You're making a compelling argument for me to buy this scanner. I have an 89 Supercoupe and need plastic trim pieces that are now classified as "unobtanium" so my options are "keep gluing it all back together" or "scan it and 3d print your own."

[@UndaCuvaChikin]

Don't lie, Matt. You bought that axle just for the shower caps. On a serious note, thanks for the solid review. I've been wanting a scanner for ages now as I'd love to be able to accurately scan my vehicles and design a bunch of kits.

[@petertimowreef9085]

I still don't entirely like you but your content is incredibly good. Glad my poor ass gets to enjoy it for free, thank you.

[@hohohaha999]

Could you use a spatter effect with reflective paint to mimic the target dots? Would be hard to get uniform sized dots and you wouldnt be able to have the contrasting black border. You could adjust "uniformity" and size with paint viscosity and gun pressure, probably couldnt get nearly as big a dot to be reliably round, but it seems like the software is pretty capable..... Eh?

[@miasnieuwoudt8952]

I also have the same scanner. I run it on a Lenovo Legion 5 with the rtx 3060 and amd ryzen 7 cpu. It runs really well. I use the scanner for parts and fabricate bull bars for pick-ups. It is a good scanner.