Jaguar i Pace 615km Range Test (NHSR)

My New Norwegian Channel (Kris Rifa På Norsk):
/ @jegerkris
Get the official 0% SOC merch!
shop.spreadshi...
Do you want to support the channel? Please check out my Patreon:
www.patreon.co...
Jaguar i-Pace EV320 Campaign model:
motorpool.no/k...
Social media @ Krisrifa
Krisrifa @ Instagram
Riisfalch @ Snapchat
MY GEAR
Camera: Sony A6600 amzn.to/3jU6mz...
Lens: E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS amzn.to/3jKU10...
Microphone: Røde Wireless Go amzn.to/3daERQ...
Editing software: Adobe Premier Pro CC 2020 amzn.to/3rOyve...
Computer: MacBook Pro 13 M1 8GB amzn.to/2ZhDCH...
DISCLAIMER: Links above may be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the links that I provide (not limited to the products in the links), I may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge for you, but you will however be supporting my channel. And that is much appreciated.

[@hugodeandres1497]

I still don’t understand why you go 110/120 when the car is panicking, maybe go 60 if that happens. This was bound to happen

[@jpinto3912]

This video should just be used to show that when you see a fast charger when you're already less than 25% and your range isn't enough to make it back, charge it right now. The buffer is there, to avoid cell inversion permanent damage, not to be abused trying to keep at 120km/h.

[@KineticEV]

Straight FACTS. You are spot on I thought I was the only one thinking this. I commented above about that. He nor anyone should never rely on that buffer. There's a reason why the car's GPS has a route planner that tells you where all the charging stations are and when you should consider stopping to charge. His WHOLE experiment failed.

[@ichigo19870]

​@@KineticEV You guys do get that he literally tests these scenarios so that people know that could happen with this particular car so that "you" won't do the same mistake? Obviously he we wouldn't dare to do that with his own car on a normal trip but it's important to see how the car behaves and I am thankful that he pushes it to its limits

[@anthonyc8499]

Glad you're okay! That was somewhat nerve wracking. Seems like another highspeed run attempt is in order but you'll need to play it safer.

[@gery4870]

Soon or later, this could happen. Otherwise it's been the best test EVER man !!!!!!

[@RoteLars]

Use OBD tool that will help you a lot. Never run out of juice. Never stranded.

[@KineticEV]

Yeah, when you made it 3 hours in and had an opportunity to charge at that 2 stall unit before you turned around and came back you should have done that. There's a reason all these cars or even using A Better Route Planner exist in and for EV's. You have to use them. And you should NEVER rely on the phantom bottom out charge to get you anywhere regardless what the car is predicting. You now know that this car at about 15% goes into power consumption mode so that mean your buffer is 20% (5% 0ver their power save mode). Then you charge to 100% (road trips) and/or 80-90% (daily driving).

[@inspectorseb5286]

Picking up my first EV on Monday, this video gave me anxiety. Interesting as always Kris!

[@thorerik]

don't push it unless necessary. the battery last longer if you don't go to full empty and full(eg. stay between 15 and 80)

[@fullyelectric]

Kris, sorry this happened to you .. and good to know the iPace has major issues below 10-5% .. With that said I don’t like major corrected times .. truly best to redo the test base on the real world limits of the iPace meaning only plan for 100-10% or to 5% for range before charging is needed as you can’t go to 0% safely So you don’t the math and subtracting time from charging by adding buffer that may actually not even be a real buffer just made this test invalid.. Still what is learned is the iPace range max out at 5% safely and predict remaining range below 5% is not real and can’t be counted .. thanks for pushing the limits and I hope you always will ..(well on good weather days lol)

[@The70s80scollection]

I would try this again with a target of only charging up to 80%, when going all the way up to 100% on rapid charging the last 20% is painfully slow and is some cases takes almost as much as it was to charge to 80%. On a long journey that requires multiple charging stops, by only going up to 80% on some charge stops rather than 100% would almost half the total charging time and may only require an extra stop....worth trying just to see, that last 20% charge is so slow.

[@clementmussotte6384]

The screen shuts down when you’re running out of battery? What if you’re navigating to a charger? Who thought of that? Great video though :)

[@marcbungener1877]

your test is a nice complement to Bjorn 1’000 km challenge, indeed in the 1’000 km challenge the result were rather disappointing but are better here with a smaller distance given the initial range is rather on the good side of things but charging is somewhat slow. Having both your test and Bjorn gives interesting perspectives. I also use ABRP to simulate holidays travels with various cars.

[@DES0MX0]

wow totally no 0 buffer this car. glad I didn't get the Jag 320 when the promo was going in Q4 2020 in NL.

[@vytautasdantas7360]

real driving in winter at 100 km/h outside -5 celsius 250 km in the best case

[@mister_jon_jon]

Great video. I think a good advice is never go below 5%, if you want to take care of the battery. Try to stay between 20-80% on daily basis, of course on long trips it's needed to stretch this, but not under 5%... But I like these videos, but you should ad a recommendation maybe in text in the video how to drive a BEV.

[@Carbonracer1]

Lol, this was not unexpected 😀 But the car was giving so many warnings. Pushing 120 in limpmode…. Take a new run, and give the car a correct time 👍

[@rpgPalette]

If I had 10km on the screen and 12 km to run for the charger, I would reduce speed to 50-60km/h, turn off lights, only with DRL on, turn off climate and use battery saving mode that turns off screens.. But riding 120km/h with climate when you have only 5km on the screen was very risky.

[@ojeskog]

Interesting that the time in summer conditions including running out of juice and having to get recovery out and get towed to a charger is pretty much the same as doing the trip in heavy rain in 3-7C temperature. The weather really makes a massive difference in travel time on long journeys in these big EV SUVs. Thanks for trying out what everyone else like to avoid Mr 0% SOC.

[@jatinkhatri5084]

Its range is around 470 km how it can cover 600kms

[@robertocalvo934]

Finally the Day of Reckoning hath come for Master of Zero %. You've been staring into the abyss for too long... 😀 Ps: That was very dangerous though. Stay safe my friend

[@nevco8774]

Actually iPace is known for unreliable calibration on 5-10% portion of battery.

[@crimmeyd00d47]

Yes exactly, dealers talking crap as always and stories from US of jaguar ndas on lemons doesn't instill confidence in the brand. I so want an ipace but don't trust Jaguar one little bit. In contrast Hyundai recalls the kona for battery replacements. May have to consider ioniq5.

[@davidkalfa7228]

When will there be a test drive on the C40 Volvo

[@KrisRifa]

No one knows, there are only like three prototypes in existence !

[@ulfhultberg9998]

Li batteries are great but they have one disadvantage to lead acid. They dont recover at all. In the "lead age" we could run out of juice, but if the car stopped you just stay for about 15 minutes then you were able to go for about 5 km more. But this dont you young guys know. Otherwise a nice video.

[@simonrushton4639]

How’s this possible? You ask? It’s simple you went to zero and you thought it was wrong and it wasn’t, so your fault?

[@abraxastulammo9940]

Oh no, it has happened! At least the eSoul crawled to the HPC when it surprisingly lost its power. 😳

[@schunkelndedschunke6914]

Dont try to drive any BEV to 0% SOC on a motorway. Could be dangerous.

[@gianlucadellavalle9197]

If you drive in dynamic mode, your consumption is better, trust me

[@doThatGWalk]

Really?

[@gianlucadellavalle9197]

@@doThatGWalk yes, definitevely

[@wolfgangpreier9160]

Good car! 👍 Made in Austria! 👍😂🤣😂🤣

[@kevinn1158]

I expect the new Audi Q4 AWD will be 20k less than this. I like Jags but they are really in the end over priced and have a reputation for having more problems than other manufacturers. It just doesn’t make sense to buy one of these. You just know those guys picking you up were laughing at you the whole way. LOL. Don’t go to zero. LOL. Check.

[@janolafonarheim2735]

Q4 quatro 50 awd will cost between 650000-750000 kr I Norway . This ev320 start at 600 000 kr

[@kevinn1158]

@@janolafonarheim2735 the 90kw I pace in Canada starts at 91k CAD. The VW ID4 AWD 77kw is between 50-58k CAD. What does the 90kw ipace cost?

[@trondlauritzen6359]

@@kevinn1158 it's the same battery sice on both the I-pace 320 and the 400. The difference is just that they take out 400hp on the 400 and 320hp on the I-pace 320...

[@thomassoderqvist4666]

Guess this was bound to happen sooner or later. Don't think "normal" drivers would take the chance like you do all the time. Still believe the iPace is a nice car (never driven one...).

[@babnu]

Wow. That was scary. Please be careful. Not worth the risk.

[@thomassoderqvist4666]

Suggest you do it once again and don't gamble this time. Too much estimations in this result.

[@johncking1150]

On the next test why not carry 3 passengers because that is what the vehicle is designed to carry?

[@jonnyrogersuk]

Driving at 100kph up hill with cruise control and wipers on...hmm!

[@RohitGandhijaimataki]

A death trap. Do not fall into trap by just looking at it. It has been six months I bought 8-10 weeks it has been in the dealership. 3 times nearly escaped death (stops in the middle of the no where). Won't move in car wash. Problems you name it this car has it.

[@chton]

I'm pretty sure it's cheating if you do the NHSR on the back of a diesel tow truck

[@johnminshall242]

Good to experience that, I suppose! Shows the i-PACE just needs a few tweaks to range and ‘low power’, as it’s unfortunately not quite competitive enough on the longer runs. Shame, cus it’s a gorgeous car. Let’s hope Jaguar address this for the mk2 and give that car a better range and recharging capability.

[@manfredo4287]

Kris, consumption is high, because 21,8 and sitting on the truck for probabky 60 km is high, isnt it? ;-))

[@celsorogerioandretta28]

It seems like the weather here in Curitiba ..kkk!

[@gianlucadellavalle9197]

With pcc is impossible to fail destination

[@tubaterry]

Here's hoping Jaguar learns to underpromise instead of underdeliver on the range estimate :(

[@palladwr15]

They are only permitted to the WLT figures, buyer beware!

[@ram64man]

It’s British, if I tell you I’ll only do x amount of miles at a snails pace I mean it not like those gerry’s that give you a unknown safety margin , when it gets to 10% it’s time to plug in

[@schunkelndedschunke6914]

It's built in Austria by Magna close to Graz.

[@mrmuds8624]

Up until now, I thought your "zero percent" scenarios were staged, that's no longer the case 🤣🤣🤣

[@davorinskvaridlo3567]

Are you aware of your unsupported claims? First you claim not knowing the SoC, then you say stories about SoC, especially talking about 5% having 5km range, then you drove for several minutes at 120 claiming it goes 5 to zero.

[@ChuckJ1944]

DNF is DNF in my book. Disqualified. That sounds like the battery management system should normally tell you that you are down to 0% when you are really at the point before the lithium battery drops off a cliff (say 5-10%?) and this time it didn't alert you before it really was at a true 0%. BAD! Sorry you had that experience.

[@mklnm]

clean the screen...

[@markmd9]

Bjorn has no guts to drive to 0% 😂

[@PierreSimonsson]

have you :)

[@TheHaspro1]

The battery is empty when the computer tells you it is empty... who would have thought that?? Sorry mate, but Darwin says Hello

[@andaswewindondowntheroad]

I pace is over priced with an ugly rear end. F pace is beautiful in comparison