Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2018 - FULL REVIEW

[@fergalkearneyphotographyde6783]

A massively thorough review of this Jag. Sadly lost in the KZbin hierarchy. Thank you for this amazing review.

[@CarandDrivingCarReviews]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@PennyFarthingx]

currently looking at one of these and this is the best reveiw on youtube pissed off it took me so long to find it thank you for posting you have a new subscriber

[@CarandDrivingCarReviews]

Much appreciated

[@tacfoley4443]

I think they should rename this car as the F-Type Acronym - I've never heard so many strings of letters mentioned in one toad-test in my life!

[@linussvensson8005]

I love the look of this Jaguar. Im thinking over picking a used xf 2019 with the 250hp petrol engine over a 2019 v90 inscription. They are real cheap over here in sweden.

[@tacfoley4443]

Lucky ol' you.

[@mikecrosbie5850]

very good, many thanks for the in depth review.

[@CarandDrivingCarReviews]

Glad it was helpful!

[@tonybooth4]

I am told the ingenium engines are rubbish in terms of reliability in real world conditions. I think a 3.0 V6 S with 8 speed box is the way to go

[@davidkmatthews]

Another brilliant review - many thanks! One odd point, though: at 29:25 you mention that you can use an app to check if the sunroof has been left open... but isn't the sunroof simply a fixed, unopenable pane of glass on this version of the XF ? Thanks.

[@pyropete6669]

why quote ps for power? ps is german pferdstark, which means horsepower

[@i.c.d.-videos1901]

Probably using PS like Jaguar do & the rest of the car motoring industry. Metric horsepower is slightly more. 300 vs 297 Bhp. A higher & rounder number. Also a way to confuse potential customers with grand figures in none matching units. Bhp & PS are an outdated way to measure engine performance especially when referring to the engines torque in Newton Meters (lbs feet if using Bhp / PS). The engine performance should be referenced in Kilowatts. This would be around 221KW. Not quite as grand a number to 300 PS.