FIVERR Vs AI - Is this the END for ARTISTS?...

[@Jazza]

10% OFF ALL MERCH with code "LASTCHANCE": draw-with-jazza.creator-spring.com - don't miss out, this classic merch is going to disappear soon!

[@d4red3v1l8]

I already got your cup and I’m always using it!!

[@justyc3]

Hello there random people 👋

[@Lucia-rq3cc]

Hi

[@kris_4545]

Im sowwy i got no money

[@kris_4545]

I love art tho

[@4dragons632]

This video was just depressing, not because of the AI, I have no fear of AI at all. But for fiver. Those scams absolutely broke my heart.

[@peterjj1991]

I for one welcome our new AI overlords.

[@calvinjohnson6242]

All he had to do was find people with good reviews…

[@rickh3714]

Fact- nearly all pro AI comments have likely been sent by AI ! If one had access to DALLE and were ALSO able to use one's own imagery as a factored in resource base ( that presumably couldn't/ wouldn't be shared by others using the service ) you might get more individualized ^ 'human' results.

[@4dragons632]

@@rickh3714 I agree with that. Although when it takes your own image it tends to copy the exact shapes in it rather than being able to identify concepts you want it to run with.

[@sagesmith8443]

You should fear AI.

[@jamesbinns8897]

As a fiverr artist, seeing other artists doing that sort of stuff and ruining the name and legitimacy of fiver is extremely discouraging

[@irtissayo5389]

I can imagine that.. there isn't a more controlled platform?

[@LucarnAnderson]

Yea it makes me sad of the scammers getting the money rather than real artists. That’s why starting off on fiverr would be super hard as all the no stars are usually scams.

[@KnockKnock.]

Tbh it's his or his team fault that they chose unverified artist who have no reviews and no proves to show that they are actually legitimate. Like how can u be this stupid!

[@autist1cvoice]

@@irtissayo5389 sad but no

[@Vineethajojo]

I know it is discouraged because more people are less likely to buy commissions from artists

[@pdeprotesto]

Even the $240 tip artist did not create the art piece he’s delivered… Unicorn is the horse from “Spanish White Horse” by Julia Moll… It’s flipped and with a horn… OMG

[@Shajirr_]

We need AI that can detect traced / flipped / transformed stolen art, existing reverse image search is not good enough for this

[@igretrovods9189]

Damn, I just googled it and it’s true, so sad.

[@themysteriousdomainmoviepalace]

But that's called stealing like an artist because he used the horse as a model for a full painting of something completely different.

[@markmuller7962]

@@Shajirr_ Ye but we will forget about these scammers and generate AI images directly. AI art is a new born and doubling in performance every 12 months, these AIs are the worst that will ever be. 10 years and art fiver will not even exist

[@ratchetandchank8648]

that person had good reviews as well guess fiver is just a place to get scammed

[@IngenuityFortress]

I'm not worried about AI stealing my job. I'm more worried about Etsy shops stealing it and selling low quality prints of my work.

[@JeM130177]

Friend of mine has had that a lot recently. Moreso with other sites, not etsy. I've done so much messaging people and telling them off. Plus like you say they just take it from insta or something and stretch it and don't even know what they're doing having it printed in such low res. It's depressing. But one had a review saying it was blurry etc. so i knew their deal. My friend is experimenting having quite a clear watermark (which obviously isn't on the legit prints she sells).

[@eatplastic9133]

Yea the watermark is a must

[@vadominiqueenpunkt6589]

Simply, DO NOT POST your artworks online, without a fullwide visible watermark. Poeple who love your art pay and contact you. Dont worry putting offensive watermarks.

[@yukichan177]

you should be, you can sue the etsy people, but u wont be able to do it do the AI that steals artists works and combine them whatsoever.. not to mention big and small corporations will use the AI and deprive artists from jobs becuz its cheaper to buy a program that will generate some logo for you from others people works than paying an artists to do an original one

[@Raexai]

@@JeM130177 bro tell ur friend to hide their watermark in their art please!!, recently seen others doing it and have been doing it myself not taking chances bc ppl are opportunistic

[@foxery9673]

You should try to generate some AI art and then try to finish it by hand, or use it as a base to paint something in it :0

[@justafellowhooman3576]

this.

[@91Vault]

makes me feel weird about ever posting art online...even though I'm not entirely sure where they source their images (web crawling maybe?)

[@Christopher_Gibbons]

I keep trying to get it to give me half finished sketches but it just gives me finished sketches of things cut in half.

[@dazzyx3644]

@@Christopher_Gibbons maybe try using the word "unfinished" or just "sketch", "uncolored", "rough sketch"

[@turpskadey]

This is something artist Loish did, they generated a prompt of "Loish style artwork" on the free version (so it couldn't do a face) and then used it as their sketch and finished it from there, looked really good.

[@Gavaksh-by-Anupam]

As an artist it is my humble request to everybody, please give work and money only after ensuring that the artist is genuine.

[@MythosMasonry-fq1up]

how?

[@FeastForThought]

I thought, I would find out where the difference lies between the work of an A.I. and a human artist. What I gathered was, you can't trust anyone just because they have a Fiverr account lol

[@ginascreations612]

Ikr why didn’t he ask for progress shots and or proof before commissioning or paying the full amount?

[@FeastForThought]

@@ginascreations612 I agree, there are certainly steps you can take to make commissioning work more safe. But it's probably just more fun for the video to show a badly photoshopped picture instead of an revision process.

[@scrcrwninja]

Notice that everytime what looked like an actual original piece was created they have a rating on their account. I know that its hard for breakins to get work, but man when your paying 100+ dollars for a piece from an unknown without any reviews big red flag

[@ginascreations612]

It really disappointed me because if he would’ve done those small simple things most likely would’ve known and then that money could’ve been given to actual hardworking artist

[@shelbyherring92]

Also doesn't help that Fiverr is kinda crap as a site, one with how much of a pain it is for mobile users to create a profile and two with all non-vetting.

[@lw8882]

Definitely dispute those transactions with fiver if you haven't already. Also Alternate Title: I paid fiver artists $1200 and got scammed.

[@turboterps]

the crazy thing is Fiverr is mostly siding with the scammers and not with the customer

[@jomotv2320]

Omg

[@14bqdonk]

@@turboterps Because Fiver want to get those % from customer

[@ORagnar]

I also recommend looking for fiverr artists with long and good reputations, so that you're more likely to get someone who is honest. You can check their reviews section to determine both. 1, 0

[@2DReanimation]

@@14bqdonk I don't get how it always goes like this. Can't they see a bit further, to the obvious even, that satisfied customers means more customers!?

[@treedoesstuff]

White horse for the unicorn at the end belongs to Julia Moll it seems "spanish white horse". I would suspect the clouds may be swiped from somewhere as well, this is a photoshop image again. Fiverrs just a bad place for scams it seems, approaching people on their actual pages on say artstation, deviant art, etc etc, might yield better results.

[@phonix6665]

As someone who has used fiverr many times now, and also fell into a few frauds, I can see you doing all the mistakes. ^^'' You chose an artist with 0 reviews, no prewies artworks made on the site and displayed. This is never a good idea. Also if you see someone display lots of different styles over multiple or just in one gig it's usually stolen art. + If skeptical do some image reverse searches and see if you can find the displayed arts from different artist. Also, look closely at the images displayed, most of them feature an erased watermark where the OG artist signed it. Also, someone haggling the price up that drastically is never a good sign. And lastly, DON'T ACCEPT THE PRODUCT! if you recieve the final product and it's clearly a fraud, never press the accept button. If you are not happy press the "i am not happy" Button. If it's fraud,report it to the support and ask for cancellation to get your money back.

[@veteraaan2]

Und wegen Leuten wie dir Sitz ich dann 800 Jahre an banalen Revisionsarbeit

[@snapplecode7262]

@@veteraaan2 well if it is what you offer

[@DreamingBlindly]

And the fact that you have to go through all that just to confirm the artist kinda paints Fiverr in a bad light because the site's job was supposed to be securing both the artists AND commissioners but sadly, they seem to only care about the money now

[@Mikelaxo]

I'm pretty sure Jazza knows this, but he is choosing to get scammed because it's funny for the video

[@W0lfi-lkc]

I have to disagree with you on your 1st reason. Just because I person has 0 reviews doesn’t mean they have a higher risk of scamming you, that’s could be a new artist trying to grow

[@smji5269]

Let's not forget that without the millions of digital art and photography that artists post online, the AI would have nothing to work with.

[@craniumsnumb]

that would also mean that if ai was the only thing to go off of, it would combine into a massive blob

[@_Encie]

Let's not forget that without the millions of sweat shop workers that make clothing for a minimal wage, the first world would have nothing to wear. See the similarities?

[@smji5269]

@@_Encie it's not similar. We can still produce clothes without slavery. AI works a different way, it needs something to work with. You can't train an AI to do something without material and data to start with.

[@eudacye709]

@@smji5269 an artist needs references too ...

[@arcaneminded]

@@_Encie Did you just compare freelancers to modern day slaves?

[@eXWoLL]

The last fiverr image was AI generated. It has the characteristic noise patterns that result in them, some were probably photoshopped, but they left some that are quite noticeable in the rainbow and horse hair. Also the lighting style suggests that it was probably generated with Midjourney (I'm almost 100% sure of that tbh)....

[@whitepouch0904]

Which is better Dall-e or mid journey?

[@willyxt7647]

@@whitepouch0904 mid journey

[@Shajirr_]

@@whitepouch0904 Midjourney is better for artistic/creative styles, but it has a style that is almost instantly recognisable Dall E seems to be better at following specific prompts, better matching output to your prompt, which other AIs can struggle with, it has the largest set of concepts that it can understand. Unless its censored, then of course you get nothing or a possible ban.

[@whitepouch0904]

@@Shajirr_ thank you for that info. If I ever used this kind of AI it would be for my master’s school works. So I need something with Dall-e functions.

[@sloppynyuszi]

@@whitepouch0904 what degree are you doing? If it’s an art or visual communication degree isn’t it just cheating? Just pay someone in your class to do your homework then, instead of feeding some machine. Obviously money isn’t an issue f you just gonna type out your visual arts degree.

[@megajennybenny]

At 10:50 , that art is also looks like photoshopped "Spanish White Horse" by Julia Moll with some edits and some midjourney background. It was identified by another commenter @Nigel Hirth.

[@CherryBlossom-mh6vv]

Your 100% correct about the horse, but idk how you could prove the background

[@alaynaguthrie3312]

Oh noooooooo. Thats heartbreaking

[@macavitymacavity9504]

@@CherryBlossom-mh6vv I have created atleast 1k+ image on midjourney and that abstract smokey background arts is a very common elements of the AI

[@CherryBlossom-mh6vv]

@@macavitymacavity9504 makes sense, so all of the horse attempt were fakes, sad

[@macavitymacavity9504]

@@CherryBlossom-mh6vv well I'm a digital artist my self and for me this AI Generated image will be just another tool for me to level up my art, just like how CSP have a 3D tracing model feature that help me create faster Webtoon. This AI image will hugely impact my the artsy part of my webcomic, now I no longer need to spent 4-6 hours a day creating background for it. We are born at the start of something big, so buckle up because it's gonna be a one hell of a ride.

[@Hurricane047]

Would like to see this revisited at some point but only with artists who have at least a few reviews, a lot of the scammers here had 0 reviews and you were paying them hundreds or dollars. As someone who works as an artist on Fiverr, you have to start off small, and then if the demand is there you can start charging more, it's the only way to stay competitive. You can't just create a new account and set your starting price as something very high because nobody would trust you (and with good reason, judging by this video).

[@adeadgirl13]

This video was so sad for me. I'm a fiverr freelancer. I do mostly graphic design and I can't understand how people can offer to design a logo for $5! I was thinking, I'll start my gigs at $50 and try to explain in the description that you can't expect to get something good for $5. But now it seems that asking for more without reviews will make me look like a scammer.

[@TheLoveMiku]

Yes i also work at Fiverr and this is very true. I also would like a part 2 of this video with people that have good reviews.

[@lessemo]

@@adeadgirl13 The worst thing is when sellers that have like 300 reviews still charging 5$ for no reason. Like honestly, they could charge 10 or 15 and work 3 times less for more money. EDIT: Actually much more than 15 when you have 300 reviews.

[@AnymMusic]

@@adeadgirl13 oh same with me and music. I look at some of these people, and it's like "I'll make a beat, mix, and master it for only $5 and within 3 days." and just think of how lowly these people think of themselves. I can't compete with that. Make an entire track, mix it, and master it with unlimited revisions within a week? yeah no.

[@Heisenburg17]

I thought that art categories is the only non scammer services. There are actually a lot of fake art gigs. Is there a better place with real artists?

[@DaDa-kf4vp]

I’m not an artist and this pisses me off. I feel so bad for all creators out there, so many con men ruining reputations.

[@bollgrodan7]

It's worth pointing out that most of the artists in this video had 0 reviews, which I wouldn't necessarily trust with hundreds of dollars lol. I also wonder if the ai could accidentally include copyrighted images, since some of the stuff just looks like multiple pictures put together into one (but I don't know how it actually works) still, it's cool to see the stuff that ai can put together and it looks like a good tool for quick concept art.

[@HotdogSosage]

It can't use copyrighted images but I'm too lazy to explain why lol. It draws on concepts and it gathers these from images but not with enough specificity

[@kuromiLayfe]

What the ai does is make a noise map and then go over the billions of images in its database to find shapes resembling the words of your prompt in ever so smaller details till it thinks it has it all correct.

[@SCtester]

No, the AI doesn't combine existing pictures, it's synthesizing entirely new images.

[@SkyfishArt]

While it can't copy existing images, a lot of them sure looks very derivative of existing work sometimes. The AI doesn't know when it makes something that looks like something else, you could end up with a fake looking copy of another artist work on purpose or on accident by invoking their name or genre.

[@magicpan6873]

In my county’s copyright and right of ur own picture is extremely strong and I could see a future problem with AI especially with artist them self

[@alambrito3377]

I think y'all had the wrong approach. You should've ask for the commission of an artist who specializes in x topic and then ask the AI to produce an image based on that, seeing if the artist gets outdone in their own element

[@jacobe2995]

This

[@ajvaldez42]

Next experiment!

[@sebastianjost]

That's a different question. This video showed what happens when you need a certain image and pick an artist/ dall-e to create it for you. Both are interesting questions.

[@PaletoB]

AI vs Jazza

[@tigerdcd]

good future video idea, upvote so he sees it

[@ichigoy1]

As an artist that works on Fiverr, this is embarrassing :(

[@Hugh.G.Rectionx]

hahahahaha beat by AI

[@jxxxxx44]

@@Hugh.G.Rectionx shut up

[@thetaomega7816]

time to look for a new job

[@angelblue1527]

Sorry to hear, I know some greats artist to definitely do original work. Plus Fiverr is so convenient compared to DevientArt or any other sites

[@baconwizard]

When looking at the painting requests you got scammed on, it clear they’ve used a photoshop filter to get that effect as none of the brush strokes correlate to the direction of the colours.

[@halloooo1duuuuu]

Which one?

[@Klbkchhezeim]

@@halloooo1duuuuu it's just sad that we've come to a point where scammers are so widespread that someone has to unironically ask which one.....

[@nigelhirth2181]

The unicorn in the Kylearts picture @ 10:50 is taken directly from "Spanish White Horse" by Julia Moll.

[@chocol4tecats986]

DAMNIT

[@Fitzcarraldo7]

Sheesh

[@TerkanTyr]

oh my fucking god what how are these people so successful via such shitty dishonest work?

[@caenir]

Actually tipping a scammer. Damn.

[@skyz3ra]

omfg thats fuckin disgusting. like when he said faith in humanity restored i actually felt it and then i saw these comments and compared and yeah ..same exact horse

[@podclipstation]

The fear should not be ai in itself but AI used by scammers like these to saturate the art market and undermine actual artists. Obviously it's gonna be hard to tweak it for them but i believe they might eventually work around it.

[@Sharklops]

so for the most part this ended up being a competition to see whether humans or AI are better at impersonating real artists

[@bingusdingus8239]

Honestly it felt like I was just watching jazza get ripped off by artists

[@pinguino4219]

The art at 3:45 looks like a "wombo dream AI", and that can explain why it is unfindable, also that AI is very good at ignoring specific things, like the vase

[@absolutemaniac7368]

It's even got that discoloration most AI has

[@shiloh7855]

Yup i was just about to say that it looks ai made itself, and thats why u cant trace it back. Very very similar to wombos style. The real downfall of artists is not gonna be AI doing better, but artists using AI without the customer realizing and not doing any work themselves

[@brandimunguia]

I don’t know that he said he couldn’t find the image in the internet. The text he put on the screen was that he couldn’t find the “artist” who’s work he had commissioned.

[@theodemello7399]

In 9:36 the paintings the scammer used in his profile, are all from an artist called Carlos Ranna, he's my art teacher and its kinda sad seeing his work being used for scamming people.

[@sithlord5149]

so they were all scarmmers

[@ejsuperstar]

Gonna be honest, this whole AI art vs human art is scarily reminding me of the plot of Suchart. It's an art game that's been shown off on here, the plot is that you're one of the few human artists, and in-game people will seek you out purely cos you're an actual human. It's a really fun game but it's kinda terrifying that people are actually having to start thinking about stuff like this

[@FlamespeedyAMV]

Eventually the Internet will be nothing but bots and ai, if it isn't already and hasn't been for years

[@kaitlyndickson2245]

Who needs to fear AI when the true horror is art scammers

[@kusog3]

exactly, the people who abuse AI is the problem and not the AI itself.

[@tiosevenstars]

Cant agree more. Like people who use phones can use it to help humanity, or scam people. We just need to be aware

[@jmhorange]

@@kusog3 Nukes aren't the problem, people are. That's why I think I should be able to own a nuclear weapon.

[@Idk20061]

...because of scammers , real artists have less costumers and now that there is AI , why bother paying and artist who could be potentually a scammer , when you can get the art you want for free .

[@burakkanka321]

@@jmhorange Yes, because a bot, the sole purpose of which is to generate images has the same level of danger with a hunk of metal capable of leveling cities. What a great analogy that absolutely helps your argument.

[@AlexanderWeixelbaumer]

1980: AI will never beat someone at chess, it's to complex 2000: Ok, but AI will never succeed at Go, because it's too intuitive and even more complex that chess 2016: Ok, but AI will never be as creative as real artists because it can only rely on data already created 2022: Ok, but AI will never turn against us and make us to slaves

[@ITR]

what use would it even have of making us slaves

[@gaymer2698]

Bruh 💀💀💀💀

[@wbh623]

feels like the robobastards are coming for all of us slowly but surely xD

[@Akilla02]

I don't want to be that guy, but I think they can't do that unless they're made to learn how people feel like anger, sadness, joy, etc.

[@14bqdonk]

3/4 already proven by AI. wait for next

[@Zoeswildart]

You should do a YOU vs DALL-E 2! Make your own illustration based on prompts commented, and then ask DALLE to do their own version! Would "in the style of Jazza" be recognized?

[@gracielou05]

Needs more likess!!!

[@CreativeSteve69]

This would defently be a fun expirament.

[@dragonwarriorz1]

He already made a video like this

[@Zoeswildart]

@@dragonwarriorz1 not quite!

[@thattheresagirl]

I am 90% sure that the "good" fiverr paintings at 3:50 and at 10:50 were also AI produced, or photobashed at the very least.

[@moonstone7446]

The one at 10:50 seems like a mismatch between buyer and seller. My understanding of their listing was that they would take a photo that you had and turn it into that. I assume, based on the prompt, they didn’t have a photo so the artist chose to find their own. There’s no knowing for sure if they had the rights to the images they used, but that’s also means that there is a possibility they did.

[@penguinfromantartica]

The first one was most certainly created with Dream by WOMBO.

[@karmegapulavar5438]

10:50 might well be Midjourney

[@ET-yc4wb]

@@penguinfromantartica Dream by WOMBO is not that detailed and does not have a landscape feature, but it could most certainly be made by midjourney.

[@JusFoNo]

I'd imagine that those ripoff artists saw the cover of the book "Steal Like An Artist" book by Austin Kleon but never actually read the contents.

[@PyroBlitz]

I haven’t drawn in an year and seeing all these “artists” making no attempt at what they are paid for, even asking for MORE money for their work, and ends of making poor art hurts a lot. It is such a shame that those who are actually good at their work are underselling themselves… so glad you gave them a good tip. ❤

[@gweltazlemartret6760]

Comment afterwards by Andrea P: "A user named Shawn in the comments discovered that the unicorn from that last artwork is from "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll. 😑 It might have been mashed together by a human, but it nonetheless looks plagiarized to me." /Hope

[@j.griffioen1415]

fiverr needs a feature where the stuff that they make automatically appears on their profile, in this case it would show their trashy work dlso people wont fall for it

[@notsew008]

It a actually does. My gigs show all my past work

[@claragraal9762]

@@notsew008 It doesnt do it automatically. Buyers can put the work with their review after an order, but if you send your work through a ZIP the buyer just can't put it in their reviews at all.

[@Shinesart]

My gig show most of my past work for clients on fiverr. Of course if the client allow for it to show when they accept my request. It also shows the comments from buyer.

[@MizziTheFoxdragon]

And show legit artists.

[@freeEnd_]

Then some people could order shitty things just to ruin other accounts

[@haf.gallery]

Watching this video while taking 200$ fiverr project for 10 cartoon illustrations makes me feel relieved that even i use pinterest to get some photo references, in the end i make the illustration fresh and original. I used to draw everything from my own imagination, and image references is just a reference. I draw my own illsutration because i love this and i had choose this thing to be my career. So, the money orientation isn't at the top priority, but the satisfy when i can draw client's brief, and they feel satisfied with my work.

[@ahmadyusuf5755]

I hope we as Artists can still work and make money comfortably. Amiin

[@-__-55555]

What the hell- I can’t believe that many “artists” were just ripping off bad stock photos, that’s so sad :c We really need to be supporting these real hard working artists. This is just really upsetting.

[@gabriel-kahn]

I love how all the 'oil painting' gigs were just people putting on the oil painting filter onto terribly photoshoped, or poorly drawn artworks lol Also 192 dollars digital painting is literally AI generated. ...oh and the last unicorn one seems to be AI aswell... holy shit

[@thattheresagirl]

Righ? The $192 city and the unicorn absolutely have that AI look. And you can see on the page of the unicorn guy that all his other examples also look fake. Like you said, most of them look like they applied an "oil painting" filter, especially where you can see that the clients' faces are just photoshopped onto existing oil paintings.

[@AndreaP_N7]

A user named Shawn in the comments discovered that the unicorn from that last artwork is from "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll. 😑 It might have been mashed together by a human, but it nonetheless looks plagiarized to me.

[@CM-iz5ny]

@@AndreaP_N7 Holy shit it is. That's gross.

[@stay_curious]

Those photoshops were ridiculous! The last one was incredible 🤯🤯🤯

[@mrs.johnwinchester420]

I just recently used Fiverr to commission a tattoo artist to make a custom design for me, and he was absolutely amazing. I’ve done the back log searches to make sure it wasn’t copyrighted, and there is nothing on the internet even close to what he had designed for me. I believe I just lucked out on my first try. I’ve been working with the same artist on building my full sleeve. Im sad that there are people out there that are scammers. Because then you come across a really great original artist and they don’t charge nearly as much as I think they should for the quality they give. I hope this can only get better.

[@Eltaurus]

Sure, you can still beat the AI if you are an experienced artist. But the availability of such an option will create strong competition for beginner artists, making it much harder for them to be in the field long enough to develop a decent skill.

[@shredd5705]

Midjourney is already beating 90% of pro illustrators. Also the speed of working matters too, not just the end result. AI can whip out 10 images in the time it took a real artist to get his equipment, canvas, brush and paints ready. Even so-called "speed painting" digital art takes usually minimal 1-2 hours to have decent image. AI can do the same in 1-2 minutes, probably with way more detail

[@shredd5705]

Also this will affect kids and teenagers. Who will get demoralized, and never even start learning the real skill

[@LeTrashPanda]

"AI will save the world" doesn't really compute.....does it? But anyone can CALL themselves an artist and many people do.

[@LinkEX]

Commercial art is bound to decline since highly customizable visuals will be able to be generated at the push of a button. On the flipside, art for the sake of art will be facilitated with AI-generated reference material.

[@monkmichel9477]

@@shredd5705 That's what my concern is more than the effect it has on jobs of existing artists. In my free time I try to improve my digital sculpting skills, I started years ago but its just a hobby and not a job and never will be, I'm fine with the progression I see for myself and that'll be it. Still, 3d will be next on the menu for machine learning and go the same route as 2d is going now. I'm not sure that if I was born into an AI environment where all the mechanical skillsets are executed by software and only the creative decisions are left to humans that I would ever get motivated to do anything else but that, decide what the software will create with text or speech. I don't really think that's a good thing tbh but a lot of people compare it to cutting out the boring tedious part, which I find a bit weird. And even tho I say I'm fine with improving my mechanical skills for the sake of it and not having it bound to a monetary aspect, will that still be true once I can get an even better result for way less time and effort using AI in the future? I'm not sure that my motivation will survive that experience.

[@onerxowns2202]

11:26 As Ex-Photoshop artist i might say, it's a "cheap work" why ? There is three things A: Background obliviously a part of real painting, existed before i recognize that painting style, it is NOT artist work. B: Unicorn are, a UNicorn took from some wedding picture colladge, again NOT artist work. C: Rainbow MIGHT be done by artist... But i am doubtful. In conclusion only real work a "Furby Spider With Human Legs Over Tokyo in style of Jinji Ito" what one is 100% original.

[@thattheresagirl]

Same! It is either photoshopped from different images, or straight up AI produced I think.

[@AndreaP_N7]

Apparently someone in the comments named Shawn figured out that the horse from that picture is from "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll.

[@MoonshineTora]

I'm pretty active on Deviantart for years and I now find more and more images created by AIs on there. The interesting part of this is: you still recognize that it's made by an AI whether or not the uploader gave the program credit. There's always something uncanny and oddly surrealistic about it that can't be produced by humans because (I recon) we are too influenced by reality. I don't know how far the AIs are going to evolve and change the quality and overall looks to more match the expectations and skills of these of humans. But I see your point when you say you get more detailed results from humans based on the commission, not only because we understand the unwritten meaning behind the words and can communicate with each other on a whole other level, but we can actually discuss details and ideas, while the AI can only spit out variations that it thinks might fit your expectations - and they are mostly very similar from what I've seen in this video. For as long as AIs can't communicate as metaphorically as we do, with the ability to discuss details the way we do, I believe the need for human artists will not seize to exist.

[@MoonshineTora]

@Norma Neumann Most "art" that has been thrown out there by humans is plain boring and they even make money with it! So what's the difference? I'm pretty impressed by some images I saw made with Midjourney AI, regarding composition, art-style and colour-scheme as well as atmosphere. The images in this here video aren't as impressive compared to Midjourney. But then again, Every artist has it's own style. The AI might learn what style speaks to it's audience the most and uses it more often.

[@ShawnFumo]

@@MoonshineTora Yeah MJ has been having people rate previously generated images and when they recently released v3, they incorporated that into the model. So that kind of feedback loop is already starting to happen.

[@yukichan177]

you can recognize them becuz the ai takes art from a web search and trace it basicly... so you can recognize that it was made by a programm and not an art of actula person

[@jamontoast1414]

we are in year 3 of proper AI art. in 10 years there is no doubt it will eclipse basically any modern digital artist.

[@zianawind2970]

This actually inspires me to continue my career as an artist. And reminds me that it’s not only about being specifically highly skilled, being truly original, truly human really giving it your best to honestly convey message or emotion.. AND doing it As Impecably as possible.. that’s The Hope for an Artist, there will always be someone interested in sincere dedication and honest work

[@carminearts]

I new fiverr had some scammers here and there but this is absolutely wild. I hope these people get removed from the platform. As for the AI, it did insanely well with the prompts provided

[@endlessemptyvoid]

Fiverr is not a good website, imo. Too much competition. Plenty of good artists sell their art for basically nothing, and it's honestly a bit unfair. Then you see the kind of "artists" in this video...

[@lordbiscuitthetossable5352]

@@endlessemptyvoid Agreed. I got a manga styled drawing of a couple NPC's in a campaign for £34 and it more then delivered on what I needed. So there are definitely artists out there that are more then capable of delivering who under appeariate the value of their own work. So much so I felt obligated to hand out a hefty tip. That being said; they definitely should've been more selective on the artists selected. A lot of them weren't even rated! You can't throw that amount of money at untested "talent."

[@akaking7499]

As a very struggling Fiver artist seeing so many scams on that site while I work for days on a 15 dollar order is crushing.

[@mvv700]

I feel the same. Working my ass off 12+ hrs a day, working on projects at a low price just to get the first customers in and then there's people like these.. No wonder half the clients I get are very skeptical of paying me a fair wage for work and I'm stuck making a drawn animation worth a weeks work for 40-60 dollars.. :( For how much trash there is on the platform with scammers (both sellers and buyers trying to scam new artists) without much being done about it Fiverr shouldn't be taking that hefty 20%... I'm getting my client portfolio together and hopefully will be able to move out of the space and transition elsewhere, keeping fiverr comissions on a low backburner.

[@Kaotiqua]

Seeing the first daguerreotype around 1840, the French painter Paul Delaroche declared: “From today, painting is dead.” When I was a young musician, and Casio had just begun selling digital "instruments" on late night TV, I had a terrible fear that music was dead before I'd even begun my career. As an artist, I don't feel threatened by AI, I feel inspired by it. Any fool can pick up a paintbrush. It's what they _do_ with it that (sometimes) becomes art. AI is just a very cool, interesting paintbrush.

[@ZockCool]

Agreed

[@michealokeefe2221]

The implications are for commercial artists and designers. Now, all clients need to do is turn their briefs to an A.I generator, rather than to an artist or graphic designer.

[@Kaotiqua]

@@michealokeefe2221 Have you worked with any of the currently available art AI? If you had you'd probably come to realize that just like any other artistic tool, AI requires practice, patience, and skill to achieve the really stunning effects you're seeing. Yes, it's faster and easier to achieve them using the AI, and _sometimes_ giving an AI a really simple prompt, like, "Show me a cat wearing a tophat" or whatever, can yield reall great effects, but that's really not the case most of the time.

[@Kaotiqua]

@Cassowary Egg I'm gonna guess you don't have a lot of experience with creating images using AI. There are simple basics you can achieve "easily", sure. AI has no trouble serving you your cheese and pepperoni. But if you want a stuffed crust half-meatlover's half veggie supreme, with anchovies, you're going to be spending a longgggg time workin' that sh*t out.

[@RichardThompsonCA]

As a commercial illustrator of 30 years, I think AI is certainly going to be disruptive. It seems to be improving at a breakneck pace. Just a few months ago this stuff wasn't nearly as good. In advertising I have no doubt they will adopt this technology. For the last 30 years ad agencies have pushed tighter deadlines, lower budgets, and unlimited revisions. With rising costs of subscription software and so many programs you need as a professional to complete the job, it's definitely an undervalued occupation. I read an interview with an old commercial illustrator (I think it was one of the hildebrandt brothers) and he said back in his day one good ad agency job would buy you a new house. Now your lucky if it buys you a new video card.

[@TunaIRL]

The rising cost of subscription services are because they are getting more valuable. You're able to do more and make more off of them than you've ever been able to before. The competition is just bigger and you need to keep up.

[@Kaotiqua]

One good ad agency job could buy you a new house... if you were one of the Brothers Hildebrandt. Also, you should consider that the Bros. Hildebrandt didn't have Wacom, or touch-sensitive digital styluses. (Styli?) Anyway, they worked in paints and mediums that were toxic, and took hours or days for a layer of paint to dry before they could continue their work. Some of them were lucky (and successful) enough to be able to afford models, but those who didn't had to learn and be inspired without the help of the internet. Digital painting has not replaced actual ink and paint, nor will AI replace you. But it might be wise to start learning to understand and use it as a tool now, while it's new.

[@dibbidydoo4318]

@@TunaIRL that's just a feature creep.

[@pinki8888]

This is one of the reasons I’m scared to do anything online involving sharing my art ! As much as I really want to I’m just so wary of people stealing and profiting off my work! And I’m trying to figure out how to start using my art as a income and this makes it really hard

[@piexactlyequalsthree]

I think you have to accept the possibility that someone is going to profit somehow on your work if you ever want to show, share, sell or create anything. Mozart isn't alive anymore and see how many are creating profit from his work now even unpublished ones.

[@pinki8888]

@@piexactlyequalsthree yea I know it’s just annoying to think of .. like it seriously annoys me seeing it happen to strangers so I guess it’s really really going to annoy me when it’s possibly me it’s happening to ! Although Its just one of the reasons because the main reason I’m having trouble is because my add brain gets super confused and to many different tracks /ideas I find it CRAZY hard to focus on one and it just takes me forever to end up making a decision ! It’s soooo hard trying to follow through on a long term project when your like that ! That and I definitely doubt myself on a constant basis so yea I’m hopeless 😩😅

[@CoolMagmar]

Here is a tip, the only social media that will need to get real money for your art are Linkedin and Behance (if you want to work with games Artstation too) and a site with your portfolio, and these ones being so professional with many copyrighted material I don't think AIs will start stealing too soon from them, after making your site start sending emails to companies that you think your art style works. Another tip is going to a place with multiple stores and start taking notes of the companies you find what will work with your style.

[@piexactlyequalsthree]

@@pinki8888 I understand it's hard to focus with all that ideas and creativity. It's annoying for sure to think of people who take your work and use it. :) I think they'll have a constant stress to coverup when they blatantly steal. :) I hope you keep doing what you enjoy most. A lot of artists are sad about the fact that they have to create for the market not for their own joy and happiness. :) If your work has been worth stealing it's maybe something to be proud of. Still annoying and hurtful for sure especially when you see your hard work get ripped off.

[@NutCase]

I have to say this video makes me worried. I don't like "artists" (most seem to be scammers and not really artists) being put up against these AI programs. It's crazy to see people starting to use these ai programs and not hiring real artists. I feel a video like this may add to that as well. Why hire someone who might not even finish your art when you can ai generate it?! As a freelance artist this movement does worry me. People use to joke about how "the computer just does the work for you" when we draw digitally and now these programs are. Also the fact that they use a data base filled with art, photos etc to make these. Most likely the artists in these databases have not agreed to have their art used for this as well. I just wish as a fellow artist this video was either done a different way or not done at all.

[@snaphaan5049]

As a working artist (drawing and painting) your future is gonna get pretty bleak. This stuff is improving at a astounding rate. Don't spend the next five years learning to draw. Spend that time learning to utilize all these apps into a functional workflow for speed and effeciency. But you have bigger issues... Add to this monster the idea of CRISPR babies and the enormous benefits it will have - but not for you. In a couple of generations human beings as we know them will be a thing of the past. If you can cost-effectively genetically modify humans to be smarter, faster, more beautiful then we are redundant. It's weird, almost every tech development , from self driving cars, boston dynamic's robots, midjourney AI, 3D printing etc is replacing physical labour. It's like man's answer to the Garden of Eden. We don't need God to go back there. We can counter "in the sweat of your brow" with and machine server power. The writing is on the wall. I mean, when you have silicon valley intrepreneurs waving normal human beings as a burden and glorifying a "new designed haminity" then we are pretty much damned.

[@MitridatedCarbon]

I think nobody is talking about the copyright problems cause this is a developing technology, and these companies are kinda tricking people through half a century of sci-fi cliche and without explaining what AI and artificial neuronal network is. The only reason it is so detailed it is because of artists and the art they have put on the internet for 2 decades. if AI art gets more mainstream I presume the laws for Data protection will get heavier, like a lot, cause there is a lot of stuff these companies have to explain. what if a graphic AI makes adds for condoms, and one of the photos it has learned from was of a minor? What if Disney art, the same people that wanted to sue a parent for putting a picture of spider-man on his son's grave, gets fed into the machine? In the future artists, or anybody online, will have to specify if they want their datas to be used for machine learning, or will even have to be hired to teach the machine. And if this AI art gets mainstream, it will be absurdly censored. like, in some AIs you can't even write the word corpse in a prompt.

[@MitridatedCarbon]

@@snaphaan5049 Until there's a black out.

[@NutCase]

@@MitridatedCarbon I hope that if it does become more main stream things do change. But there's already so little protection for artists with their art online now adays. You have to slap huge watermarks on your work so people don't take it, repost it, and claim it as theirs. Places like Facebook and deviantart have already opted you in this because of their tos saying they can use your art if you post it on their sites etc.

[@iminumst7827]

@@MitridatedCarbon If all these Fiverr artists are getting away with basic super obvious plagiarism. You should realize the law is highly overrated in it's ability to be enforced. And all it takes is someone to release a good open-source art AI for people to train it themselves without being limited by regulation, a great example are the pornographic deep fakes of which were banned on mainstream platforms but are still being created constantly.

[@agnivalahiri9347]

I dont know if you did it on purpose or not but someone like you who is so well versed in the digital art sphere would know not to commission fiverr artists who ask a lot and have no reviews.

[@NickVanLoon]

Going back to the fiverr artist ripping images straight from google, I think a huge benefit of AI, is concept creation! You may have a idea in your head and can get a good concept from AI without copyright and go from there. That is what I have been using it for. But also after seeing what you paid for on fiverr.....I think I should start one to help balance the human vs ai side haha. Great video

[@jaydefoy1143]

Just had a convo about this! As a traditional artist myself, I don't worry about collectors suddenly giving up the desire to own individually created artifacts. The paintings that I've sold the fastest with the most interest were because of the stories behind them, not because they were technically difficult. Concept artists will get hurt, which sucks. People will certainly get fewer of those "sketchy" jobs that pay well ( artists know the ones I'm talking about). On the bright side, poor folk can make art for the book they just wrote. Kids can develop game worlds or inspire themselves with AI prompts. Who knows! It's gonna get weird. But at the end of the day, not many people go into art with the dream of making money. I'll still be doing this shit if no one is buying it. lol

[@Pandemonioxo]

Its all pros and cons, as someone who can struggle to find references for certain visuals and so forth, this seems like a great tool for me. And also there is something sad to me that i cant translate my thoughts as well as an Ai and also thats like being sad im not as smart as a humongous amalgamation of code. I think it really depends, for some working one on one with an artist and the communication barrier of ai will be off putting, for others not so much. Only time will tell

[@irkendragon]

I wouldn't rely on AI for reference, you're baking the lighting, anatomical and perspective problems of the AI into whatever you make if you do that. Same issue as trying to learn anatomy from stylized manga art. You have to start with what's real and build a good foundation before introducing someone else's filter into your work and practice.

[@JanbluTheDerg]

Technically, the AI is using the same 'steal artwork' toolset as the "artists". Only its much better at it, and much better at combining multiple stuff (point raised in replies, all artists use references, so the AI is acting similarly to proper artists in that sense)

[@zohabaig6426]

All artists combine multiple images to create something if they're working in any sort of realism or realistic anatomy. No one can draw a perfectly realistic tiger from memory, for example. There's nothing wrong with taking reference from other artists, the issue comes from LITERALLY photoshopping the exact stock image into your art

[@LeakyTrees]

No, because the "artists" literally stole assets, full assets. The AI is just using inspiration.

[@charlieheath943]

@@zohabaig6426 also, "from memory" would still be drawing off previous images/experiences of tigers, so even completely from memory would still be from prior art.

[@JanbluTheDerg]

@@zohabaig6426 Fair point

[@Ritzylamma]

the fact that anyone would even go to fiverr knowing just how bad it is for actual artists due to the 'race to the bottom' mentality still boggles my mind

[@joshnizzle]

Thieves is a huge problem. My family sells decorative signs on Amazon with our own original designs and so so so many Chinese sellers have stolen our exact designs and posted it isn't funny. And Amazon barely does a thing to help. It's laughable the help they provide. They keep on stealing our stuff and under cutting the price and sell crap quality that has our name on the design still so people think they're getting our stuff. It's maddening

[@krismas6857]

Thank you for tipping the beautifully done unicorn on the rainbow. It was stunning.

[@BeyondTheWhisps]

Jazza should totally check out the Midjourney AI! the artworks it can make is honestly outstanding.

[@Nebulaoblivion]

Yeah, for instance, it almost undoubtedly made the artwork he just tipped $240 to some guy for.

[@FordRasmussen]

@@Nebulaoblivion I've used Mid journey and a lot of times it doesn't get animals perfect. It takes too many creative liberties. But to your point, those scammers could've used MidJourney and gotten away with it easier.

[@justinwhite2725]

@@Nebulaoblivion midjourney is horrible at animals (as mentioned), otherwise I'd Beleive it.

[@TehBananaBread]

@@Nebulaoblivion no you clearly dont use midjourney.

[@nigelhirth2181]

That unicorn is taken directly from a piece called "Spanish White Horse" by Julia Moll. Like 1 to 1.

[@NorthoftheBorder]

Is this the end for artists? Nah, it sounds more like the Golden Age for artists who make weird stuff based on other peoples' ideas. Now these _unnamed artists_ have a limitless supply of AI generated prompts. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal to me.

[@heymewisconsin7841]

AI sculptures on dolle plz.

[@POOKIE.Z]

This is gonna blow up

[@TimeMasterOG]

yeah ai is literally the future of art.. someone who cant come up with concepts properly now has a tool at their finger tips to be able to put a couple words down and then get a concept generated for them...

[@chadcrypto2675]

@@TimeMasterOG I'm been using these tools for several months now to stimulate the imagination. I'm actually having dreams again and able to clearly imagine better and create better prompts to get better results that I can expand upon to transform it. It's such a breath of fresher air.

[@geohost6811]

Sure, you say that until the AI starts sculpting

[@natasha6867]

yay back from vacation to another DALL-E Jazza video, what a pleasant surprise! i think it would've been even better if you had put a split screen of the best DALL-E and fiver images side by side at the end of the prompts to make it easy to compare

[@CreativeSteve69]

Here is my take on A.I Artwork. I was in a creative block for a massive long time ever since my class ended. I gave Midijourney a try to test the A.I for references. It honestly got me back into the groove of painting n making art again using the abstract art it gave me as inspiration. I can see these tools being super helpful when it comes to creative workflows more than taking over and help speed up process on whatever projects people might be working on n with. That is my personal experience n take of A.I assistants as I see them. :)

[@snaphaan5049]

Maybe. But as a working artist (drawing and painting) your future is gonna get pretty bleak. This stuff is improving at a astounding rate. Don;t spend the next five years learnign to draw. Spend that time learning to utilize all these apps into a functional workflow for speed and effeciency. But you have bigger issues... Add to this monster the idea of CRISPR babies and the enormous benefits it will have - but not for you. In a couple of generations human beings as we know them will be a thing of the past. If you can cost-effectively genetically modify humans to be smarter, faster, more beautiful then we are redundant. It's weird, almost every tech development , from self driving cars, boston dynamic's robots, midjourney AI, 3D printing etc is replacing physical labour. It's like man's answer to the Garden of Eden. We don't need God to go back there. We can counter "in the sweat of your brow" with and machine server power. The writing is on the wall. I mean, when you have silicon valley intrepreneurs waving normal human beings as a burden and glorifying a "new designed haminity" then we are pretty much damned.

[@ivonned32]

u sound like a commercial 🤣

[@ivonned32]

@@snaphaan5049 Fucking well written. It is worrying to read how ignorant people are in this thread. Im glad I found your comment. There is still hope!✌🏽

[@firecatflameking]

Yeah it's the same with code generation AIs. Basically smart Google

[@Kaotiqua]

@@snaphaan5049 That's one nihilistic idea of the future. _OR_ ... all that tech will eventually make capitalism irrelevant, and humans can stop trying to turn every idea into a side-gig or cash cow, or slaving in the corporate mines, and instead follow their dreams and passions, like painting, or sculpting, or making music. The advancements in medical technology will extend those happy lives, and reduce the instinctual urge to breed like rats. Hard work will be something we do because we enjoy the use of our healthier bodies. Imagination can deliver either world, or something in between.

[@SilvyReacts]

I will also say, as an artist myself, I have always been pretty annoyed with how so many artists seem to undersell their work. And the thing is, I don't think they realize how much they are hurting other artists by doing that because it leads to people undervaluing that work. So then customers expect it to be cheaper than it's actually worth, and you get them telling other artists their prices are too expensive. It's honestly pretty frustrating. It's why many artists have turned to things like Patreon and just locking their work behind a paywall.

[@XD.73-849]

1:30 I can imagine ‘mysterious hieroglyph’ on the vase

[@boopbeep1849]

KyleArts is actually the guy who painted Ludwig's portrait on his special roast.

[@kylo0053]

I know him personally, lovely dude

[@mityakiselev]

PepePains

[@CaptDiablo]

I wish you'd commission actual professional artists you can find on artstation or twitter or reddit or something, instead of wasting money on random scammers on freakin fiverr. Yes it would be a lot more expensive, but you could actually see the massive difference between AI and an actual professional artist.

[@ninneko19]

Sadly those sites have scammers and thieves on them too, it's just something that we have to be cautious of. I think the people putting this video together could have done maybe a bit of a better job at vetting the artists, and I hope they reported the account as it's so fraudulent 😭

[@tobiasurey1434]

¡This^

[@xmegantronx1505]

“What artists should be worried about is the thieves of humans!” Well yeah, we have been ranting about that for years on end, but AI hardly seems different. A scammer will badly throw together images that don’t belong to them and pass it off as their own while AI… does that too.

[@gordonbrinkmann]

You can think of AI what you want, but a scammer badly throwing images together is not what AI does. The scammers take the existing images, maybe photoshop them a bit. The AI is more like if you would show someone a lot of images by an artist and then say: now make something that looks like it's done by that artist. Only that the AI got shown many artists and photos etc. It learned from images, but it's not doing copy/paste like those scammers. You may not like AI, but still it is working different.

[@xmegantronx1505]

@@gordonbrinkmann That’s not true. There have been many incidences of AI blatantly spitting out images very close if not spot on pre-existing images within their dataset. The AI doesn’t work at all like a human does. There have been incidences where prompters try and avoid the AI directly copying someone’s existing art or IP and it did anyways.

[@ripzmad9846]

I'm... definitely feeling discouraged in pursuing art.

[@theskyischill]

That’s why I only do art out of the love of doing it. There’s always a bigger fish. Now that giant fish is AI. All the artist can do is improve and keep on if they really love doing it. And let this thought reassure you: Without artists, there would be no Dalle. There would be no progression in it if all artists stop posting. WE ARE Dalle.

[@istoleyourjams270]

to be fair if AI overtakes an artists career it will slowly take over other careers. In the end nothing will be really left for us regular humans. Edit: Just wanted to add it might not be so dark for us. For example puzzles these days are mostly cut with a machine so they can of course sell more of them. There is this one puzzle company though that makes hand cut one of a kind puzzles and one puzzle costs $2 000 ! Granted they are an established brand but y'know, there will always be people who appreciate the craft and will be willing to pay more for it.

[@JeM130177]

As someone else said you do have to be doing it mainly for your own enjoyment and interest and wanting to create and improve but I wouldn't let some AI bot put you off. A lot of the time people are paying for your artistic talent and recognise the skill and that's what they look for. I've done pet portraits as commissions before, I am open about using a photograph for reference and I work in a fairly high level of realism. People can frame the photo or even just look at their pet if they want but they don't because they like that it's done by a person 😊. Personally I find so much more value in art when I can see the effort put in. It doesn't have to be super complicated or amazing, but drawing is so fun for me that I'd be much more drawn to others pursuing that same feeling than walking around a gallery of computer generated images. They're cool to look at and impressive from an AI perspective but definitely more soulless.

[@eatplastic9133]

Peiple before me are kind of right. Learning the basics of drawing will help you in anything creative you want to pursue further in time. AI still has a hard time with 3d, animation, movies and a lot more. You can also try glass, ceramics, scene design... every time I get discouraged I look up some philosophy about aesthetics. People have had questions and hardships with art for centuries. Good luck

[@Espartano692]

Pursue it for the fun of it. For the pleasure of doing a good job for a project of your own.

[@mad_hatter3392]

2:09 … love you ❤️ Gareth amazing editing

[@Eralealea]

Re: Dall-e and hands If you prompt it to specifically draw close up hands, it will do that just fine. The issue appears when you tell it to draw full human figures - it doesn't know how to place hands in the context of a posed human. Just look at the astronaut and knight paintings generated - the hands have a basic pose at best and indistinct club shapes at worst. Renaissance paintings have delicately posed and beautifully painted hands. The 6th astronaut at 5:18 has one set of wonky fingers and one flipper. From that alone, I would say it has failed to meet the style requirements given in the prompt. Come back when you can paint hands like Raphael 👋

[@nnnik3595]

I don't think that thats really what's happening. AIs like Dall-E work by reversing the operation of generating a describion for a picture. Simply put all these AIs work because we learned how to generate prompts based on pictures. The AI tries to draw things until it then can generate a picture that ends up having a matching description to the input. If an AI would choose a different description than you would for something it will also choose to draw something different. It's not that it can't draw hands. It's that it wasn't told to draw hands intracately in front of a person. Also the AIs understanding of art styles is superficial at best. Assuming that it will draw detailed hands due to renessaince is a bold assumption. There are some really blatant flaws in the AI though. If you try the prompt "Cat with 8 legs" in DaLL-E, Dall-E 2 and Imagen they will most likely just generate a normal cat since they cannot really count. Parti fixes that issue though.

[@Evelaraevia]

This video has done more to hurt my impression of Fivrr artists than anything and that's a shame. The few people who delivered original art had some incredible work at least, especially that last one.

[@Nordlicht29]

If you mean the last unicorn on a rainbow that's probably fake too sadly..."Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll is the exact horse...

[@CM-iz5ny]

It's stolen art my dude. The horse isn't his.

[@La0bouchere]

It's more a problem with Jazza than Fivrr. Avoiding scammers is pretty easy, and even if you do get scammed, you just refuse to accept the work and get your money back.

[@theoboangiu7950]

All the BAD plagiarism, at those immense prices is really appalling to me. How is this a thing? This is why I keep away from Fiverr.

[@Hoezi02]

They don't get paid until you confirm payment AFTER having received the artwork. (Seller has to confirm that the request is finished, buyer has to confirm the request is what they asked for). Also, these sorts of things only really happen with new sellers. If you choose rated sellers, you'll be fine, aside from regular disputes that always occur between artist and commissioner.

[@SlyFoxStudiosInc]

I do have some inputs that you can put in DALLE 2. . Sinister villain from a cute Saturday morning cartoon . An alien playing a bass guitar in a spaceship . Unicorn wearing a loose robe enjoying some coffee and a muffin . Frida Kahlo meeting her past self . A geisha in the style of Studio Ghibli . Emotional vent artwork . Something you’d see in your dreams or nightmares . A stock image of a plumber being stuck in a toilet . Psychedelic SpongeBob SquarePants . A gangsta raccoon spray painting graffiti on a brick wall . A liminal space mirror maze . Snow, Rain, Summer, And Spring combined into one new season . A new holiday that’s unusual but fun . Daft Punk’s final tour . A crazy KZbin thumbnail . A painting of a king holding a bowling ball and smoking a cigar . A mascot for a company that specializes in art and animation . An African tribal mask that’s colorful and has glitter . A Disney and Pixar movie scene that involves a bunch of dogs having a tea party . Joe Biden in a commercial for McDonald’s . KZbin Rewind The Anime . An old gypsy woman gazing upon her crystal ball . A wizard live streaming his magic on Twitch . The next generation game console . A new video game mascot for Nintendo . Impractical Jokers celebrating Halloween . A brand new emoji . A nice pair of squishy shiny toy balls . A floating casino in the sky with slot machines and coins . Super Mario in a dress and wearing makeup . A female Grand Theft Auto protagonist . A Netflix movie poster . An aesthetically pleasing museum . Creepy hallucination . A photograph of a dinosaur wearing a top hat and a monocle . Sleep paralysis demon . A world set in Virtual Reality . A reggae Rastafarian jellyfish . The Wizard Of Oz meets Alice In Wonderland . A man entering an enchanted cave that’s a portal to another dimension . Utopian Candyland with pastel colors . A cat entering The Matrix . A mascot for a company that involves scented lotions and shiny lubricants . Amy Schumer hosting an event at Anthrocon . Storybook illustration of a gingerbread princess . A digital drawing of a demon and other creatures tap dancing in lederhosen’s and fraulein’s on Broadway . A children’s drawing of Melanie Martinez . Lego Video Game leaked concept art . Cute CGI ghost playing VR . The Boyfriend from Friday Night Funkin having a rap battle with Parappa The Rapper . The universe in a jar . KZbinr video thumbnail . Funny greeting card . Kung Fu Panda but it’s made by Disney . Adorable plush toy baking a delicious cake . A pair of intergalactic high heeled shoes . Dark purple gothic church . Jaiden Animations and Theodd1sout salsa dancing while famous artists are watching . A golden Apple in an empty room . Randy Couture in Dragon Ball . Pewdiepie cosplaying in a pink nurse outfit and a cyan colored wig posing with a toy syringe . The Legend Of Zelda by Vincent Van Gogh . Kim Kardashian slimed at the Kid’s Choice Awards . Tom And Jerry standing behind a burning building . A luxurious treehouse . 3D video game landscape . Elvis Presley but he’s an anthropomorphic furry rabbit . A donkey wearing a sombrero eating tacos and drinking a mojito . A conga line that features video game characters . A claymation shot of a drag queen singing at The Super Bowl . John Cena in Jojo’s Bizarre Adventure . A werewolf getting a manicure . Jerma swimming in a giant cup of Starbucks coffee . A new Nintendo video game character Or if you wanna give it a bit of verity then create some artwork and see what the different variations are. The possibilities are unless!

[@StefanCreates]

6:33 when you get so excited your voice turns autotune on

[@TessaRoloson]

Such a quality video as always Jazza! Thank you for being kind & seeing the value in others art. I respect & commend you for tipping the artist that truly took the time & effort where others didn’t.

Dude, honestly? You've got scammers, AI art posing as their own and maybe one actuall artist (that manga thing). That ancient city and this unicorn looks totally like something Midjourney is producing...

[@Dreadjaws]

I constantly see artists with genuinely good skills underpricing their work just to get a commission yet these scammers charge ridiculously high prices for blatant ripoffs. It's disheartening because people tend to gravitate towards artists that charge more, thinking they're going to get better results, and ignore the real artists just because they charge less, even though they do it because they can't get work.

[@619Slipk]

10:07 People have absolutely no shame to deliver that steamy pile of garbage Like... If I paid *$5* and got this I would somewhat feel like I got ripped off... Now, you pay 211 dollars and get this... I would feel like it's april fools and the correct art will come later after they laugh at me a little bit

[@plantkillable8371]

This exact type of fraud happened to me as well. I ordered a logo and was given a trace of the first google image result for my request. I even gave them a drawing they could use as reference, but they ignored it. I asked them to redo it and they barely did anything. I hate to say it but I don't see myself using Fiverr in the future, especially when I would be better of doing things on my own. Its sad that this is the norm, and that they can get away with it as they do.

[@arnvonsalzburg5033]

Did this too, once. We wanted a isometric map of the country our company is working in, having some cities zoomed out (if remembered correctly) and their some logos of our customers etc. The artist just copied a flat map from wikipedia, used the pixelated logos she could find on google images and misspelled lots of names. Never again!

[@StevenIngram]

I think the fiver person who tried to do the destroyed city and vase image used AI themselves. LOL

[@abailumlerrad1037]

Yea, from the mess-iness, lightning, typical apocalyptic bash (I know it's latent space), and complicated buildings that looks suspiciously not too straight. It's kind of shocking to me that Jazza didn't think that.

[@grunealge3869]

Sorry about that, but I'm a little disappointed. All the artists who did poorly have no rating shown, while the good ones have a five star rating. This somehow makes the whole video a little unbelievable. It seems to me as if especially bad or for plagiarism known artists were selected.

[@DaddyMouse]

I'd say this is quite a honest video. You can't always find what you want from a highly-reviewed artist. As a buyer, it's pretty common to have to step into the 0-review territory to get the job done. This is why Fiverr offers so many protections for the customer with the option of issuing a refund.

[@ET-yc4wb]

I would say they found artists for a specific "style" and highly reviewed artists also could be quite busy, so he had to resort to 0 review scammers. Also, people in the comments have suspected and even confirmed that even the high rated artists used an AI to generate their art or use photoshop.

[@ChristyH-B]

If this was their only fiver video I might think that but they've done a bunch of videos with fiver and this is the only time it's been this bad. They wanted to show that humans weren't in danger and just go really unlucky.

[@xav9635]

jazza loves to do that old man chuckling thing thing with his hand for every thumbnail

[@panthercatstotherescue]

When my dog died, a friend told me to go in fiver and commission a painting. I ended up going somewhere else because I kept coming across people passing other people's art off as they're own. I couldn't trust that anyone there was legit. Sucks that there are so many scammers making it hard for legit artists.

[@TessaRoloson]

I would love to see more of these videos, amazing as always Jazza! Maybe where you recreate the prompt in your style & interpretation before searching on Dall-e, then offer the Dall-e version & the Fiverr version. Would make for a hell of a video😌

[@BeautySnake]

Fiverr is full of art theft sadly. Perhaps Art Station would be a better way of finding artists in the future?

[@DanCreaMundos]

After using midjourney for a while which has some similarities to dalle 2, I can assure you that image you're doubting about was like 90% chance made using an AI, probably taking other image as a base and using a similar prompt. Some even let you write an artist name and it will imitate their style.

[@DanCreaMundos]

Same thing with the unicorn and the rainbow, you could easily create that in midjourney, since it makes some interesting things but not as good as dalle 2. But using a basic prompt or maybe two and combining the images you can get those kind of results. I think I'm going to create a fiverr account now lol

[@Aulcis]

Almost all of them besides the furby one was fake even the last one with the unicorn was fake, the unicorn was talen from PosterLounge by typing in Spanish white horse you'll get the same horse. Also the background is most likely an AI drawing with a filter added on top

[@kurapikakurta1997]

That last sentence really shakes me. My commissions (as little as I get) are going to be even smaller now because someone can type my name in and get whatever they want. Artists should really be able to sue these things for copyright.

[@fralinsandfriends]

The one astronaut floating in space looks like he's holding a chocolate chip cookie. So funny. 😁😁👋👋💖💖

[@emmanuelrodriguez3048]

Plot twist : the last unicorn was made with Midjourney 🤭

[@insertnamehere7574]

You are right actually. There were many comments on this vid not long ago pointing out that the unicorn is a stock image and the background was made with midjourney. Looks like someone tried covering it up.

[@khodahh]

Hard work won't pay ... These con artists have the best tools now.

[@G.A.C_Preserve]

@@khodahh to cut out the middleman and so is the con-ed one

[@alexasweet8430]

8:35 Please tell me you got a refund for this

[@dabihm498]

Conclusion: artist who actually work hard will be just fine with AI being around

[@eatplastic9133]

Nope, I'm not :D I decided to get into 3d, seing ai has harder time with it, and hopefully after few years the trend will be more or less the same. There are very few jobs out there for 2d artists.

[@fromash5289]

@@eatplastic9133 Hate to break it to you but it's been pretty useful for 3D artists for years now as well. AI will likely progress faster in the 3D space than the 2D space, not that we're being replaced anyways, I just find it entertaining you think 3D is safe when it's more susceptible lol

[@dragonwarriorz1]

Lol. AI will make art better than you in seconds. It's over.

[@dabihm498]

@@qd0t471 well that going to happen at the end for sure not just for art but for everything , it comes down to what the other side wants and if they would appreciate the work and emotion put by a real human in it .

[@dabihm498]

@@dragonwarriorz1 it sure will I'm no we're near a good artist , I'm just saying that this is just one side of the argument .

[@arthusmariet1825]

11:14 sure this isn't an ai drawing ? the contrasts are a bit too much, the shapes of the clouds seem to be quite randomly generated being very rough or clean without real logic the background merging all together and there are little residues left here and there as if they were little errors. Moreover the guys charging you only 80$ for this kind of sick piece of art is pretty far fetched in my opinion...

[@roku4344]

the title should've been "i get scammed by fiverr artist for 16 minutes"

[@Capharas]

It's almost more depressing to see so many scammers than an ai that could in a few more years take over the art industry

[@JoshKeogh]

I died laughing at 8:36 hahaha - and then 10:00 happens 😝Just dont order from people with no reviews lol. The $85 one still seems a bit sus to me though, I think they're just better at plagiarizing lol

[@AnymMusic]

that unicorn looked a bit out of place from the rest of it as well

[@athmaid]

It's because the horse is from another artist, Julia Moll. They just flipped it and added a horn

[@kr1sp51]

@@athmaid Dude i never would've been able to find the source lol.

[@athmaid]

@@kr1sp51 me neither, I got that info from other comments

[@Aulcis]

Almost all of them besides the furby one was fake even the last one with the unicorn was fake, the unicorn was talen from PosterLounge by typing in Spanish white horse you'll get the same horse. Also the background is most likely an AI drawing with a filter added on top

[@lordshuv-rowyoknow6486]

video idea: take actual artwork from humans you can find, then have Dalee make similar artwork, then have them both judged by the Jazza crew. See if they can locate the images created by AI

[@ninneko19]

Underrated comment!

[@Matt_Hil]

I think you are right, we will need start putting a caveat on every piece of artwork saying; ‘Created by a human’ as there is going become a point where we won’t be able to tell the difference between human and AI artwork. It is scary for artists who have spent thousands of hours perfecting their craft and then anybody can come along use AI software to create art and charge the same /or less to clients for an original art piece in less than 15 minutes. It will put a lot of us out of work who do this for a living. Scary times.

[@Raya.T]

that wont matter. the majority of commisions are from people who want to commisions a specific artist not for the quality of the art work. they want it to have been made by that person because they like their art and want to support it. commercial commisions are not going to work since AI art cannot and will not be copyrighted in the majority of the western world due to the inclusion of copyrighted work in the dataset that is used for learning. Unions and big corporations are already preparing legal matters to catch that one group that tries. There are already rumors of groups that are going to pull a couple to court. And considering previous legal battle's when it came to scraping intellectual properly it's not looking good for AI start-ups that are just there for the money.

[@Thedarkbunnyrabbit]

I would absolutely love to see more from this. It's been two years, I'd love an updated version.

[@ElaAmp]

That is so sad that so many people are plagiarizing and artists who work so hard are the ones having to compete again these fakes. What you did for that artist that actually created a beautiful piece, was so heartwarming. 💜

[@noobatredstone3001]

1:35 The correct prompt would be “42 inscribed on an ancient vase, …”

[@sillicon8227]

I get the refrence

[@noobatredstone3001]

@@sillicon8227 yeah, the one who requested the prompt put the exact wording actually. Even when you google it, the calculator pops up saying “42,” so they probably wanted to test if the A.I. will react the same way.

[@SuPeRNinJaRed]

4:27 Close but I think a better guess would be David Bowie (note the mismatched pupil size and other features)

[@HokeusPokeus]

I'm almost 100% sure the unicorn image he thinks was real not plagiarized art was a ai image created by Midjourney. It looks like Midjourney ai art.

[@superanimator1604]

I knew one person might say this ..so suddenly any outstanding art now can only be made by mid journey or other AI

[@AndreaP_N7]

@@superanimator1604 Compare the unicorn with the horse in "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll. It may have been done by a human, but it looks plagiarized nonetheless. :(

[@yukichan177]

all AI art is plagiarized from people who posted their art online

[@ET-yc4wb]

@@superanimator1604 I'm sure you had high hopes for fiverr artists, but sadly even that "highly rated" artist and his "amazing hand drawn art" is plagarism from the "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll. And quite obviously, the background is also plagarism or ai produced landscape...

[@ET-yc4wb]

@@yukichan177 its not. Go learn how Dall-E 2 works. Your ignorance is not gonna fool anyone dude.

[@danielblodgett1]

Been an artist forever...this is amazing and scary all at the same time.

[@Hugh.G.Rectionx]

every real artist i know is laughing at digital "artists" now. AI has made your talentless arses redundant

[@RagingGamingBear]

I want to see MidJourney vs DALL·E 2. Would be awesome to see the difference from the two AI with the same prompt!!

[@munyx]

I paid the $10 MidJourney plan just for testing for a month to see how it goes and I was totally impressed. I ran out of my 200 images in two days so I got the $30 plan and I’m always generating things. AI are insane. I’d love to see MJ vs Dall E 2. Props to the developers.

[@RagingGamingBear]

@@munyx Yeah i was going to get it but wasn't sure how fast i would run out. Does the reruns or upscale +1 to the image count?

[@munyx]

@@RagingGamingBear Yes, unfortunately, but with the $30 package, you can get the relax mode which costs nothing. You can improve it with the relax mode but you have to switch to the fast mode if you want to improve it to the maximum. With the $10 package, you get 200 minutes (so 200 images) and you don't get the relax mode, but with the $30 package, you get the relax mode + 15 hours of fast mode. I hope that you understand that, English is not my first language

[@ShawnFumo]

MidJourney I like a lot. Is very creative and tends to take a moody interpretation if you don’t guide it. DALL-E feels like it is easier to direct and look realistic, but can be a bit boring by default. A prompt like “fractal of dreams”, I know MJ will come up with something interesting looking. But my partner is into fairies and for her birthday I had DALL-E 2 make a fairy blowing a kiss to the viewer, next to a birthday case. First it looked a bit too photorealistic, so I specified it should be painted and got a good image.

[@teal2111]

what you planned: comparing artists vs ai what actually happened: scammed by con artists lesson: be careful of con artists