Would you rater buy a Compressed Air Car instead of an EV?🚗 Yes or No?
@Hassan_20308 ай бұрын
-neither, because both are scams!!! Compressed Air, EVs and hydrogen are all scams and will never work propperly.
@geogeer99118 ай бұрын
Dunno, do I want to be burned to death in a crash or have a pressurized cylinder thrust through my chest? Tough call...
@walkertongdee8 ай бұрын
@@geogeer9911 Gasoline cars burn more than EV"s
@bobyearley50888 ай бұрын
I hope this idea takes off. I can't ever see myself buying an EV.
@398paul8 ай бұрын
@@walkertongdee Milkfloats can't be put out, real cars on fire can be. So quite the opposite, milkfloats will continue to burn until the chemical reaction ends.
@owenmccafferty92958 ай бұрын
Every politician, government worker, and green advocate should be required to purchase an EV and leave the rest of us that have to work for a living alone.
@ricksterallain8 ай бұрын
The idea that they're going to ban diesel trucks from my industry is hilarious.
@eldontyrellcorp8 ай бұрын
It's really weird that the vast majority of the politicians still use ICE cars while they force us to drive EV's.
@briansture43538 ай бұрын
Anything that uses compressed air is very noisy, and the air won't last long.
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
Funny how most of these people drive gas powered vehicles, isn’t it?
@skibugy8 ай бұрын
Why is the contrast so dark on this video?
@anthonytruta27458 ай бұрын
We don't need compressed air vehicles! Our politicians run on hot air and look at all the problems they've caused..
@D-AGB8 ай бұрын
It's not hot air, it's methane gas from all the bullshit they spew.
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
🤣👍🤡
@Secondwind20108 ай бұрын
Unlike EVs compressed air does not work well.
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
@@Secondwind2010 anything that uses batteries in their present form is anti - environment, and obsolete. Also it supports our current worst enemy, the Chinese and Creepy Joe. And don’t they make delightful bonfires, if unpredictably? I for one don’t want to spend my time sitting in truck stops waiting for my golf… I mean my car to get charged up, I have better uses for my time. Sorry if you don’t.
@jameshunter71818 ай бұрын
True, and I would have more trust in one of these vehicles than a politician
@garyclack38078 ай бұрын
You have to remember this is Jeep talking
@craigtillman59888 ай бұрын
Right. I was excited until I saw it was from Chrysler.
@hagestad8 ай бұрын
@@craigtillman5988 you mean stellantis?
@jameshunter71818 ай бұрын
It's not, it's STELLANTIS.
@mesmith29228 ай бұрын
Jealous?
@g4do8 ай бұрын
The compressed air engine is decades old and had been pushed aside and suppressed. As well as self changing electric vehicles, radio wave ignition, atomic propulsion, and more . Don't be fooled. Blessed is he who reads .
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
Ok if you really thought that atomically powered cars were actually seriously considered, then you should love the burning EVs, and the fact that they are hard to extinguish. All of the examples you mentioned have been tried and tested and proven unworkable, not repressed and the fact that we are discussing them proves that. Keep your golf carts on the links and leave the streets to real vehicles.
@robertkubrick37388 ай бұрын
Even more blessed is he who reads AND understands what they have read and sadly, that isn't you and the 16 people who liked your post besides you.
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
@@robertkubrick3738 Nor, sadly, are you. You bloviate and say nothing but how wrong we are, yet offer no proofs, solutions or evidence. I have knowledge of the “suppressed” technologies you have mentioned and in all cases have found them wanting for various reasons. If I know of and have learned about them, then how suppressed were they? I would suggest that you be the one to make any of them actually work and get back to me. Then we will have something to discuss.
@robertkubrick37388 ай бұрын
@@markvincent5992 I was replying to the OP, not You. I even reference their "Blessed" spew, but you missed even that. You evidently do not even have the concept of reading comprehension or knowledge of how YT comments work. I'm removing the like I gave Your post because I don't want to be associated with someone as oblivious as you. Your likes were 5, now they will be 4.
@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev12178 ай бұрын
I'm thumbing you up about the compressed air technology is not actually new.
@jeffnewman96548 ай бұрын
This is a great video to demonstrate that you can say whatever you want on KZbin
@Slay0lot8 ай бұрын
I’ll stay with gas. Thank You!
@ricksterallain8 ай бұрын
Nah, if someone actually comes up with something better then I'm in. Gonna be hard to beat though, the energy density in gas is unmatched.
@aftonline8 ай бұрын
You will still be buying gas - just less of it. It's just another type of hybrid that doesn't use batteries.
@Slay0lot8 ай бұрын
@@aftonline nope. I’ll stay with gas. Thank You
@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev12178 ай бұрын
@@ricksterallain _"Gonna be hard to beat though, the energy density in gas is unmatched.""_ ... ...this is why petrol will never die, and also because: We have been greatly and heavily deceived by the claims hydro-carbons are from 'fossils' + about peak oil grand deception by the serious scoundrel top level swindlers. ***Oil is abiotic, the earth will never run out.*** I strongly advise you and encourage you to search for this title on here ***"Fletcher Prouty Explains Invention and Use of Term "Fossil Fuels""*** which is on "The Auto Channel" - do ensure you read the description for the video to learn of the credentials of the man talking. The clip is an excerpt from a longer interview.
@mrviper2374 ай бұрын
Shut up bot
@mRS44588 ай бұрын
Click bait!
@NBWDOUGHBOY8 ай бұрын
120 Miles per Gallon Sounds like a Pipe Dream.
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
Are they rolling out the 100 mph carburetor again?? Lol
@LyricsQuest8 ай бұрын
A gallon gas is about equal to 8.25 kwh (33.6 kwh per gallon) of useful work at 25% engine efficiency. 120 miles per 8.25 kwh, is about 69 wh/mi. At 35 mph, with a low enough coefficient of drag (Such as tesla's) and small enough frontal area (Cross-sectional area), and reasonably good regenerative energy capability with braking, 69 wh/mi is possible to achieve. However, at highway speeds, energy usage per mile scales up dramatically as energy consumption is square to velocity (Since power consumption is cubic to velocity thanks to the Navier-stokes equation).
@Brian-om2hh8 ай бұрын
My Kia eNiro does the equivalent of around 180 mpg. Charging at home, I can cover 1000 miles of town and general driving for less than £40.
@robertkubrick37388 ай бұрын
@@Brian-om2hh That's what they tell you anyway. BEV companies play fast and loose with the numbers and range in real world combined driving is 100 miles less than advertised for all makes.
@palmtreeshenanigans8 ай бұрын
@@LyricsQuest I get 80mpg with my 2l diesel if i rive at 35mph all the time,
@drewthompson74578 ай бұрын
I looked this up. According to Peugeot, this was shelved in 2014. It's a normal engine, with a boost from air compressed during braking. They said on a subcompact, they got 55 mpg, not what this video is claiming.
@gyogimiller25187 ай бұрын
apples to oranges🤪
@NBWDOUGHBOY8 ай бұрын
Hold on. If this is the case Why did they go all EV with Dodge If they had this in the works? Something sounds off with this.
@Yeths108 ай бұрын
True
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
They did it because the elites in charge told them to. Stellantis is just another way to say FIAT ( fix it again, Tony) which is synonymous with 💩. They can’t sell FIAT junk here under its own name because WE ALL KNOW WHAT 💩 IT IS! The only abnormality is Ferrari which has separated from the 💩. EV Dodges are going to sell like month old fruit. Hopefully this will rid us of FIAT et al. forever.
@sgtbrown42738 ай бұрын
As a master Air Compressor technician, i'm just gonna simply say NO! Compressed air is not cheap by any means, especially industrial grade air. This has to be hands down, one of the silliest ideas I have ever heard in my life. Almost half of the world's electricity is used to compress gases, let that sink in.
@litchar8 ай бұрын
When Stellantis comes out with their new B.S. "engine" you'll be able to drive 1000s of miles on just this video alone.
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
If we can develop an engine that runs on BS, then between YT and the politicians we can run virtually forever!
@markbarber78398 ай бұрын
Jeep Wrangler 120mpg......bs
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
If you can find a steep enough hill…. maybe. Or maybe take it up to 100 miles above earth and drop it. I’m figuring it took about 20 miles for it to get to the aircraft, so ….. 120 mpg. It’s the only way to get that mileage.
@dougikeith74938 ай бұрын
Compressed air, more like hot air.
@michaeldomanski93528 ай бұрын
yeah right!....i'll believe that one when i actually see it on the production line....NOT JUST SOME PROTOTYPES!
@jpdanzig8 ай бұрын
Given Stellantis-Jeep's sterling reputation for reliability -- what could POSSIBLY go wrong?
@onlineaccount8 ай бұрын
Its as simple as this, a city car or van needs to be electric, a car or van doing lots of miles each day on the motorway or highway in America needs to be petrol or diesel and go to an area away from the city so the last part is covered by the electric vehicle. Lorrys or large heavy use vehicles need to be diesel or electric powered by a diesel like trains. You simply can't apply electric to all scenarios
@Brian-om2hh8 ай бұрын
So what happens once oil runs dry, in (say) 25 to 30 years?
@onlineaccount8 ай бұрын
@@Brian-om2hh No more chips
@colombard1408 ай бұрын
❤❤😂😂 When air is compressed it's known as "HOT AIR" !,😂😂
@jamesmyers92857 ай бұрын
I will buy this in a heartbeat. I bought a new 2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee Summit with the Hemi (last year's availability) instead of the 4xe plug-in which added about $6,000.00 to the base cost of the vehicle.
@ward1tony8 ай бұрын
Tata has been working on a compressed air motor for years.
@Lonner_IsTaken8 ай бұрын
Compressed Air Car gives me a very big tempting, I still go with gas cars tho, but if Compressed air engine prototype goes well in the future, guess time to make a real life fictional flying Star wars automobiles and sell it to the customers! I'll be rich!
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
I’ve had my flying car on order since the 1960s and like Tesla’s true self driving car purchasers, I am still waiting!
@actualfacts10558 ай бұрын
Engineers should decide the future not stupid politicians.
@hcbides1618 ай бұрын
I think the future will be hydrogen
@bobdeverell8 ай бұрын
No doubtful for cars. It requires too many miracles to happen The molecule is small and leaks easily. First miracle: We need a cheaper way to generate hydrogen, it doesn't grow on trees, than reforming. Second we have to find a cheaper way to compress and store. Third, we need an efficient way to transport compressed hydrogen. Fourth decompression loses too much of the stored energy, we need a solution. Fifth we need to find a cheaper way to convert hydrogen into electricity for the motor, else find a way to burn hydrogen in an ICE without damaging the engine. No we may see a hydrogen world, but not in my lifetime.
@markmiller89038 ай бұрын
The future is gas and diesel.
@Brian-om2hh8 ай бұрын
That's what General Motors also thought back in the 80's
@Brian-om2hh8 ай бұрын
@@markmiller8903 Not according to Shell UK. They stated in their last business report that they plan to cut production of petrol and diesel by up to 40% on the lead up to 2030, if necessary. Shell were one of the organisations who lobbied the UK government to bring *forward* the original 2035 ban on new ICE sales to 2030.
@robertkubrick37388 ай бұрын
No it won't. But the Toyota ammonia engine would provide the same benefits with a liquid at ambient pressure fuel.
@Scorpion-wy8jy8 ай бұрын
Like a turbo or supercharger those use compressed air and are already out?
@JF-xq6fr8 ай бұрын
Finally!!! A technology more advanced than the "Chrysler Turbo Encabulator."
@tilkanash8 ай бұрын
Around 15 or more years ago Ford promoted a 'Future" pickup called the Tonka (looking and based on the toy) with a very similar air tank and regeneration system and included a "Launch Mode" where the ICE would together with Air on take Off. I personally and many of my friends were ready to buy them due the performance and fuel savings. Unfortunately Ford never capitalized it.
@MikeBaxterABC8 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure the 120 miles per gallon, is rated with a full tank of high pressure AIR, pumped in from a land based compressor. THEN start testing the 120MPG rate. They played a still picture, of the land based compressor a few times.
@frankieatworld73218 ай бұрын
I think it can work. I even saw LIVE an air powered driven small bus drive on compressed air. Yes, the air coming out of exhaust is extreme cold air. Cooling down the planet 🙂 I wait with my next Jeep purchase to get this generation recuperating with air or even charge at home with some compressed air. You get for free an hot and cold energy source that comes with compressing/decompressing air.
@arielhermoso42626 ай бұрын
@frankieatworld7321 : The vehicle can be air conditioned, using the COLDNESS of such "exhaust compressed air"- just like the "water mist" air cooler in the market today... Option for future "compressed air car" : 1) Fabricate your own heavy duty air compressor, similar in design to those being used in PORTABLE jack hammer, utilized in concrete road demolition... 2) It should be portable, can be easily loaded in car trunk, gasoline or diesel powered - "noise proofed" efficiently, its vibration cancelled... 3) A manual "on- off" switch should be provided, so the driver can RE-CHARGE the compressed air tank, while cruising the highway... 4) Or the "exhaust dry air" (like PCP air gun), should be re. cycled, CATCHED by the 2nd TANK - and RETURNED to the 1st TANK, by the built. in "electric motor", installed at the 2nd TANK... Thus, the car will become a "near perpetual machine" (NPM) in set up - or HYBRID as commonly called today....
@frankieatworld73216 ай бұрын
@@arielhermoso4262 Jeep is announcing hybrid technology on it now. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpbLnXhrf9V3o6M
@phil17588 ай бұрын
If you believe this, you'll believe that you can get a suntan in Antarctica 😅
@tomaszw77498 ай бұрын
Just count it. 40l air tank under 100bar of pressure powering 4 stroke 2l engine at 2000rpm will last 2 minutes. Prapably less due to leakidge. And under 100bar of pressure engine will produce no power and it will be droping during emptying tank. Droping pressure will take so much heat from the engine that after 2 minutes it will be frozen.
@peteralflat2818 ай бұрын
An engine that will literally destroy the EV industry. The entire EV industry is in shock and terror. 😅
@TobaccoRowe19608 ай бұрын
Free Air Supply for Air Tools, NICE!
@MarcLandy048 ай бұрын
Possibly. Sounds very promising an invention and no explosion fire hazard etc...don't need trendy; need practical and safe.
@gezza5718 ай бұрын
The Compressed air concept has been around for ages. A European inventor has a piston version, and an Australian inventor has a rotary version. All 100% run on compressed air. No govt assistance in Australia as far as I understand. But then ...... you can't tax air can you? If the politicians were serious about , they would be promoting this technology
@bobdeverell8 ай бұрын
Many technologies can be made to work, but that is not the issue. Some simple costing shows why compressed air cannot compete in range, performance and cost .
@charlescarmichael11248 ай бұрын
Looks like the 120 per gallon is a combined thing.
@stevenboyd59698 ай бұрын
As Jeep sales decline, they better do something fast or else..Bankruptcy is a good possibility.
@andrewdouglas30918 ай бұрын
Why doesn’t Stellantis also use its suspension as an air compressor. Think about it. It’s going up and own all day. You could use it as a compressor. Look at BMC’s Hydrdolastic system in the 1960’s it was Marvellous. Suspension could contribute to efficiency. Thanks.
@Gemuk-man6378 ай бұрын
It takes far more energy to compress the air than charging batteries.
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
True and having an I/C vehicle is far faster and easier than waiting for an EV to charge or burn 🔥
@Gemuk-man6378 ай бұрын
@@markvincent5992 This scenario is the same, choosing between a steam or gasoline powered car in the early 1920s but unfortunately steam powered cars died out quickly.
@rlu19568 ай бұрын
Who is ChargeDrive? I mean?
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
A group of dimwits who have trouble with truthfulness
@Nikonhermit8 ай бұрын
This thing, if it works, would be game-changing. And game-changers don't come from Jeep.
@mrMacGoover8 ай бұрын
Not to mention that all over north America the electrical grid will need trillions of dollars in updates just keep up with the demand.
@vanessapride2508 ай бұрын
I think we need to look at all options to see which is best rather than assume one is better than the other
@ThatMichaelTGuy8 ай бұрын
Kinda like a Supercharger..?
@joshgessinger45098 ай бұрын
Id buy compressed air before EV sounds like a great idea or option over EV’s.
@howardbardsley17058 ай бұрын
Sounds like a maintenance nightmare to me!
@joshhawn3988Ай бұрын
so Jeep GM and Toyota all came out with this at the same time huh?
@brianpreval56028 ай бұрын
this sounds good and way better than electric which is just a nightmare!
@logancampbell60918 ай бұрын
i think it will be a great day when instead of buying a new electric or compressed air of H2O car....we can buy one of these motors for what we currently drive and retrofit them, like my 2008 X5 poke a new efficient motor in it id be happy that would save all the old cars from the scrap heap!
@RaymondR1278 ай бұрын
It it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
@davidkennedy48458 ай бұрын
If one wants to halve emissions, drive half as much!
@MrSapplease8 ай бұрын
I’d keep a rickshaw…..as a backup!
@MrLeslloyd5 ай бұрын
New it was a joke when they said it would have a lock up clutch as a feature,my 1986 Holden Commodore had that feature.
@HectorMartinez-gy8kp8 ай бұрын
What about fords flucxcapistor engine
@user-bz9cb8bp2y8 ай бұрын
I doubt it can beat my old diesel 60mpg from an engine with 227 thousand miles on the clock... And best bit it cost £100 for the car 8 years ago.... I doubt your overpriced tech can beat that 😊❤️🇬🇧
@Brian-om2hh8 ай бұрын
Only one problem I see. You'll be forking out a packet in ULEZ charges before so long, meaning that cheap vehicle will begin costing you big style....
@AlexRadiobomb8 ай бұрын
Great direction. 👍
@otownracer8 ай бұрын
That tech has been used for years by UPS trucks.
@markbarber68698 ай бұрын
Just can't get away from burning oil.
@tonyh63098 ай бұрын
Looks like overblown hype. Compressed air storage is a feasible alternative to batteries, but I expect it would cost far more and/or the efficiency would be horrible. They show 100bar, 40l of storage. With very slow and/or good heat exchangers (ie. large/heavy) compression could be 'nearly' isothermal, meaning the compressed air doesn't heat up (otherwise efficiency suffers). It would, theoretically, store 402Wh of energy - close to a Gen 2 Prius's 502Wh useable energy from a 1310Wh battery. When the compressed air is used to power the vehicle the heat that was removed from the air as it was compressed has to be returned, otherwise the exhaust air will be very cold (not a big problem) and the efficiency will be seriously reduced. Use the compressed air slowly enough then much of the required heat could be extracted from the ambient air. However a petrol engined hybrid has the advantage that it will typically have waste heat available that could be used for this purpose. Theoretically, given that waste heat will be well above ambient the air motors could even recover some of that otherwise wasted heat energy in the engine's exhaust and water coolant. The relatively small temperature differences mean the efficiency of energy recovery won't amount to much (3% would likely be a very good result). The cost and complexity (and weight penalty) to achieve a decent efficiency would, IMHO, kill the idea. As to the 120mpg (European mpgs likely as US gallons are 20% smaller), that seems improbable. The Prius can achieve over 70mpg in the right conditions so 120 is a very big stretch. I'd love to be proven wrong though. [Edit] And whilst a failure might blow your garage doors off, it probably wouldn't burn your house down...
@bassbari03158 ай бұрын
OK... You have my attention... Now... Show me a functional model and explain all it's worts an I'll think about it... After 5 or 10 years I'll let you know if I'll park one in my garage
@davidkennedy48458 ай бұрын
There was a van powered by compressed air, I think it was in France about 10 years ago. I can't remember if it was just a prototype but even then there was discussion of tank integrity coping with significantly higher pressures and limited range. Refilling was not done on the vehicle.
@arielhermoso42626 ай бұрын
@@davidkennedy4845: Maybe, they were silenced by MONEY or "gifted" with bitter "silence"...
@stevephone49578 ай бұрын
Well they have obviously been taking some pointers from the airline industry. Planes have been flying for years on compressed air NOT Jet Fuel. So why not the same technology in cars !
@bobdeverell8 ай бұрын
Toy planes maybe. Real planes..no.
@Brian-om2hh8 ай бұрын
My first question. How will all this air be compressed, and how much energy will be used to do it?
@davidkennedy48458 ай бұрын
Powered by magic! There is a cost to everything. No means of propulsion is energy efficient.
@pplebite88448 ай бұрын
I'm game for a Compressed Air option, I'm also for Hydrogen. As long as it's not an EV. Seeing EVs explode in China and other places around the world would be comical, if it weren't so tragic.
@jbmoney3578 ай бұрын
I'll never buy another Jeep as long as I fuckin live.
@dougikeith74938 ай бұрын
It must be nearly April 1st, ha ha
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
Taint funny McGee!
@markvincent59928 ай бұрын
April Fools! Lol
@Nigelrudyardmusic8 ай бұрын
Yes, Jeep often leave the auto industry in shock, but not for innovative reasons. "Stellantis, in its relentless pursuit of innovation ......." 😆
@robertkubrick37388 ай бұрын
Stellantis quality is a problem, I wouldn't buy one. If Toyota gets the bugs worked out of the ammonia engine, I would buy one of those. I have a new Toyota Hilux 2.4 Diesel that gets 47mpg when gently driven, 39mpg in hilly stop and go. I have bought 3 Hyundai Accent 1.6L diesels that get 60mpg. We also have a Toyota Fortuner 2014 model that gets 20-25mpg but it has been totally reliable, it's also the perfect size in my opinion and we don't want to replace it with the land yaht size Fortuner. We will not buy a BEV. If I have to change the dies in my rear end and poop a combustion engine car we will do that instead.
@epc578 ай бұрын
You can't get heat from a compressed air engine so no good for cold climates. They have been using compressed air engines in India.
@MW-bi1pi7 ай бұрын
My first thought when he said compressed air in a car; the Shark blowing up in "Jaws".
@jasonthomas3698 ай бұрын
Please pray for whoever developed this… and watch the news for their “untimely passing”
@vijjreddy8 ай бұрын
IF YOU CAN BELIEVE THIS, YOU CAN BELIEVE ANYTHING
@Ken-qq6gp8 ай бұрын
This will never happen BUT it's better than Jeeps prehistoric 4XE tech
@ronaldingleby81588 ай бұрын
Air engine cannot be more than a woopy cushion. A scuba tank of compressed air lasts a diver 25-45 minutes based on depth. Cars suck in 1000s of times more air to run.
@MrFialdark8 ай бұрын
No
@JohnDoe-md2sb6 ай бұрын
Always wondered why they never developed/perfected electromagnetic engines instead of scattering themselves on fuel, EV, hydrogen and the sort. I honestly think it's because it isn't as profitable. 🤔
@ibmikkelsen58318 ай бұрын
Sounds very intressant!!!😊😊😊😊😊😊
@eugenet66328 ай бұрын
I am definitely considering to get EV, but only if I get one for free and $500 monthly payments to me so I am getting paid to deal with that range anxiety it comes with
@thomasandrews77278 ай бұрын
There is no range anxiety anymore. It’s no longer an issue unless you’re considering driving more than 200 miles in a day. And even then the charging infrastructure has improved enough not to worry.
@eldontyrellcorp8 ай бұрын
😅
@thomasandrews77278 ай бұрын
Oh yea and once all the adapters to the NACS are available with the software updates, then charging will never be an issue again. Unless you really live out in the middle of nowhere! EVs are a better option currently for about 40% of American drivers. Soon that number will be closer to 75%!
@eldontyrellcorp8 ай бұрын
@@thomasandrews7727 Well it may be a solution when a true revolution happens with the batteries (a lot lighter, lot more capacity, way cheaper,...). Until then we just notice that most car companies are somewhat dropping EV's and go back to ice's. Like stellantis which will present 40 new ICE cars models. Difficult times for EV's. And PPE, the biggest EU party, will probably drop the 2035 date or move this date further because it's not realistic at all. We'll continue to drive ICE cars for decades, I'm 100% sure. I'm not saying no to EV's. But not now. Way too early. Nothing is really ready and EV's use phone batteries at a giant scale. Not revolutionary at all.
@thomasandrews77278 ай бұрын
@@eldontyrellcorp the time is now, the technology is ready, and improving all the time. Stellantis can’t sell ICEs either because their build quality sucks. I started with a 12 Volt, drove it for 8 years with no problems. I’m now on my 4th year with my NiroEV, fantastic car, and much cheaper to own/operate than any comparable ICE. When you say nothing is “really ready” take it from someone who lives everyday with a BEV, you couldn’t be more wrong!
@n5sdm23 күн бұрын
Everything gasoline and diesel is a compressed air engine.
@mrm44008 ай бұрын
I would much rather buy a "compressed air engine" car. EV's are not just too expensive and not sustainable, but the spontaneous combustion issues with EV's was the last straw for me. People die or get injured and houses burn down because of these fires. It is therefor too risky to drive or to park an EV. The sooner EV's disappear the better for all.
@marks66638 ай бұрын
why do you attribute statements to people that were never made? I challenge you to provide the source for this quote. We both know you made it up.
@zachariahwalter40368 ай бұрын
So we’re just skipping over the possibility of this turning into a pipe bomb in the event of an accident? Yes that’s what I want directly under my kids car seat a 1,200 psi tank of compressed air. I mean you wouldn’t need to worry about suffering that’s for sure.
@Roxanne-q5f2 ай бұрын
Tesla Would say Making Simple Complicated😂😂😂
@jeaniefreeman61688 ай бұрын
Them seems to be a lot of negative comments about this and that makes me wonder why ??
@ChiragMohin7 ай бұрын
The air engine is an engine most probably make EVs obsolete. Gm knows some problems and trying to fix it.
@ld85168 ай бұрын
****sounds great. Wonder what the HP and Torque produced?
@duxburyrealestate8 ай бұрын
What you think Formula One race cars run on ?
@socksumi8 ай бұрын
I'm going to predict a cost of at least $100k or more. Ask me then if I'm going to buy one.
@BrentWShort8 ай бұрын
Real solution is a riddle….Based on antiquated system,but technically has not been invented yet….Zero emissions,high horsepower/very efficient mileage,very high thrust to weight ratio,simple to produce with few moving parts….Very few….Composite block with variable performance features….What is it?
@theahmedmamun7 ай бұрын
I will buy jeep wrangler
@freethinker49914 ай бұрын
Electric car sales in Canada go ballistic - registrations explode by 57% second quarter 2024🥳🎉💖
@andrewmainprice21798 ай бұрын
It will take years before it becomes reality
@RichardKollins-kn1xn8 ай бұрын
Is the technology related to the Scuderi engine? This is great technology.
@mattingray56518 ай бұрын
Probably too complicated to make. Hybrid gas-EV is still the best option, IMO.
@gug19708 ай бұрын
55 miles per gallon !?! : 1:52 - everyone in europe yawns. Sorry, but my 18 year old diesel golf does nearly that.
@James-sp2iw8 ай бұрын
It sounds like a time 💣 driving on a sunny day and the next thing is dark and for some reason you can't wake up .......dead
@geriatrictrippin8 ай бұрын
I wouldn't buy anything Stellantis is involved in making. And Stellantis will never compete in the high end auto market as they claim their plastic Jeeps already do. 😂😂😅
@michaelschuenemann35058 ай бұрын
The Death of theLithiumDeathTrap - HURRAH-HURRAH and HURRAH !!!!
@amandamyers45457 ай бұрын
Compressed air engine still need lubricant oil all engines burn oil (oil bypassing the piston rings) where does that burn oil go. And EV charging stations are powered by coal
@DM-ki1bs8 ай бұрын
If there is no 3rd 4rth or 5th party making any money off this invention it will never happen. by that I mean big corporations, politicians and the treasury through taxes.
@robertlindsay98268 ай бұрын
Compressed air is a very expensive form of kinetic energy. Try again jeep