JET ENGINE FUNDAMENTALS

[@k_a_bizzle]

So glad this guy went on to narrate every movie trailer in the 90s. What a legendary career.

[@hopefullylost4012]

One of the most valuable jewel found in the internet. The best learning experience about jet engines. The old school presentation was a truly top gun teaching in the subject matter. Thanks so much for sharing.

[@johns.1898]

Is it? There's plenty of mistakes in this

[@DumbledoreMcCracken]

This is the dumbest explanation ever. It creates the illusion of understanding in the viewer, without any real understanding

[@betabilly]

3rd graders in the 1950's could comprehend this, Today, any kid over 9 years old would lose interest very quickly. Wake up schools! Your 21st century public school academics, radical agendas coupled with your liberal mindset driven by a total lack of moral purpose in education will end the high level of civilization we always strove to achieve.

[@jubuttib]

@@johns.1898 Such as?

[@johns.1898]

@@jubuttib I'm not gonna re-watch it to answer you

[@tiagomascarenhas2357]

The best explanation ever of a phisycs topic. Good old XX century style, when content mattered more than superficial entertainment.

[@michaelbauers8800]

Love these old educational videos. This is very clear on the basics of jet engines. Wish I had found it years ago.

[@TheLuminousOne]

they are the best

[@jeanounou]

Never too late brother. Long as you still breathing, it ain't ♥✌✌

[@jukkatakamaa7274]

@@jeanounou ...reminds me of this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIqYiJ1_q954jtE

[@lindsay5985]

Finally, a competent and comprehensive explanation! It's sad so many of the modern videos on the workings of jet engines, with their CG animations (some with the blades actually spinning the wrong way), are actually so superficial in commentary and content, they fall so short when compared to this video - one that must have been made ~40 years ago, but with actual in-depth knowledge of the topic. What a difference it makes.

[@BoleDaPole]

Kinda lied in my application to Boeing saying I'm a jet engine specialist, first day on the job is tomorrow and this video is really teaching me something. Wish me luck 🙏

[@alext8828]

How'd you do??? Hey, tomorrow's Sunday, you liar.

[@njez7563]

@@mmm365 bro was joking 💀

[@Milkmans_Son]

You'll be fine since Boeing doesn't make engines.

[@brucebanner52]

Just remember bro: Like a gun, Like a hose and Like a balloon. You'll be climbing the ladder in no time 🙏

[@datopperharlee2628]

Good luck

[@ELCADAROSA]

I attended the USN Gas Turbine Systems school back in 1984. While this video wasn't one that was used (as I remember, anyway) it brings back memories of the training and experience I had. DD, DDG & FFG ships had GE LM2500 main engines. DD, DDG & CG-47 ships had the Allison 501 K-17 engines for Ships Service Gas Turbine Generators (SSGTG). R-R-B-R-R-B-R

[@bubblehead78]

A superb lecture, not just the best on jet engines, but one of the best lectures on any subject.

[@vatodad]

I really wish that you were correct in your assessment but there was one major error and numerous minor errors. Please read my comment for details.

[@michaelbauers8800]

@@vatodad Well, people watching this, probably are not going into aeronautics engineering, or that sort of thing. They are probably happy to hear the basics of jet engines. It's like with any technical subject. You will find the simple explanations will be somewhat misleading, but that can't be helped as complicated things are really complicated with many devil is in the detail stuff. Of course if you can do better, you should make your own improved video ( I am not being sarcastic, youtube can always use more videos, as people trying to understand may watch multiple videos.)

[@Wqk14xhddv7]

Priceless Instructional Video Extremely well Presented 👍 ...

[@petcatznz]

Superb, absolutely spot on presentation with perfectly paced detailed and fluid delivery. I was hooked from the start to finish. Thank you for posting.

[@rajasekhar9675]

This is an awesome lecture. One should definitely hear this! The jet engine concepts are easily grasped and one can learn the style of presentation too.

[@longfade]

Fantastic! This has the same quality of the old Jam Handy instructional films from the 30’s-50’s. Prelinger archives has tons of stuff like this; absolutely fascinating explanations of commonplace things mostly taken for granted.

[@alext8828]

Yes. Those were great.

[@amitpatil5151]

Good

[@jimmartin618]

Absolutely fantastic presentation. Wish I had seen it as a teen ( when it was obviously produced)... Might have changed my future. Thank you for this education, many, many years later.

[@tlg065]

@jim Martin me too

[@Graham_Wideman]

If you had seen it... you would have had a... reaction?

[@shearthrust8542]

@@Graham_Wideman IF he did , u could call him a newtonian

[@strikef16falcon58]

I found this to be a excellent presentation explaining the basic principles of how a turbine engine works, and the various types of turbine engines .

[@kerrickakinola7398]

An excellent lecture. Love the old-school productions. Explains with just enough depth for an introduction course. Love it!

[@dabneyoffermein595]

Someone with a PhD must have done this presentation. There is no way to keep it all straight unless you are just a flat-out genius, such as what the inventors at Rolls Royce must have been. OMG, this is crazy.

[@vidyasagarkotha1132]

An Excellent Video, Great Lecture, Inspiring & Pumping, must watch by all the Aerospace Propulsion Engineers

[@pavelow36]

best jet engine learning in the internet. thanks for sharing this.

[@sturman8]

Thank you very very much for this wonderful and eye-opening explanation about jet engines!!

[@stachowi]

This was SO good! I'm jealous of who could watch this back in the 1980's...

[@DGKFBGMd33Zy3]

If all my professors were like this guy I would’ve had 5 Nobel prizes by now

[@JV-tw6lt]

It is really basic and simple presentation to be honest. It is important to not exaggerate anything to obscene levels.

[@DGKFBGMd33Zy3]

@@JV-tw6lt who told you that it’s actually very important to exaggerate things.

[@JV-tw6lt]

@@DGKFBGMd33Zy3 I see a lot of fools online who are in the majority typically. They elevate people to god level one moment and drop them down to ground at the next. To avoid this one needs to be highly civilized, humble and rational minded.

[@rockapedra1130]

These old school presentations beat the pants off our more modern ones. I wonder what went wrong.

[@mileswelch5136]

Govt got involved

[@Triple_J.1]

@@mileswelch5136 its always been involved.

[@tenhendee5479]

Preference for stupidity

[@krishnannarayanan8819]

Entertainment and trying to keep the viewer's attention due to modern dopamine addiction and low attention span ruined it.

[@helihoot]

I worked at a model company back in 83. We built a model very similar to that one. It was a PW F100

[@aaronwith2950]

This is truly priceless to anyone trying to understand these topics.

[@mattb6646]

I have no reason to learn this but it's interesting as hell regardless. I'm a machinist though, and we do occasionally do work for a turbo company called Borg Warner, not for jet engines but smaller engines

[@aaronwith2950]

@Matt B Yeah I am a Airplane mechanic and I learned more here then I did in multiple weeks of my training.

[@fredfred2363]

This answers so many questions I had! Thanks for uploading it. 👍🏻😀🇬🇧

[@simflier8298]

I thoroughly enjoyed this class! So detailed! Learned a lot!

[@nlabanok]

Worked at P&W from the late 80's thru the late 90's....I took a textbook directed version of this course but, either way, it is very nice coverage of the basic engine architecture as well as the thermodynamic & aerodynamic principles of jet engines. Fun product to work on....as a mechanical engineer, there are few jobs where you can get your hands on this much horsepower right out of school.

[@francarcia3962]

my Dad tested Jet engines at P&W 60s, 70s and components in the '80s. He hung out in the back of the field near the fence for years

[@highlandermachineworks5795]

We're you in Middletown, East fartford, Cheshire. Or another state? I was in Middletown for a short time

[@nlabanok]

@@highlandermachineworks5795 in WPB, FL

[@mattapple2105]

Very good explanation how a jet engine works !

[@Chris_at_Home]

This reminds me of the class I had when I got a job on the assembly floor at P&WA in 1977. I assembled JT8s and JT9s. I’ve been in test cell control rooms. Some of those guys in there are probably working for the customer. We used to see someone from the airplane company and the airline buying that plane.

[@allanben9795]

Never have jet engine fundamentals been presented so simply. This is a very useful video

[@dennisp4395]

I think so too. I got me some ceiling fans i can use. Swap out the fiber for some metal blades i found in the junkyard. Or just cut up a ton of soda cans. Couple of 55 gal drums and a mister spray. There ya go! Redneck Air lines. Book early 👍 🤣🤣 Seriously though, it was quite educational from simplistic to a more complex explanation. Loved it. They just aren't making them like they used to make them

[@mikeconnery4652]

The best and most through explinations

[@sonumbaeng]

Nice video covering the basics. 👍👏.

[@alext8828]

I put JP-7 in my car and it went around the block in 3 seconds. That stuff is great.

[@Stu-SB]

This is Gold ! YT is amazing for educational clips like this, I save these in a dedicated playlist

[@dabneyoffermein595]

No wonder these engines are so Jet-A starved.... fuel is just eaten up at such a fast rate that the wings and other fuel reservoirs are massive and very heavy. It's no wonder that these engines have to be MASSIVE to be able to move enough air to lift tons of mass into the air (weight of the passengers and airframe itself). Can you imagine all of the physics of an airplane having to come together and work flawlessly while human beings are being moved from point A to point B in these dangerous air-vessels? Lift, thrust, compression, pressurization, hydraulics, cooling, heating, comfort, electronics, weather, speed, materials, metallurgy and a myriad of other things all have to come together and work flawlessly., without fail. No wonder these high-speed air vessels fail every so often just on their own (not including pilot faults).

[@abomarsyr103]

better than most school lectures today who agrees

[@MichaelDavis-zu2ko]

This is a great informative video. I like this man's demeanor.

[@Mark_Ocain]

Wow, this is pretty good!!! A primer before people go to channels like AgentJayZ LOL

[@jcguilarte]

Excelent explanation , it can not be found nowadays, something has been lost in modern teaching

[@bigm9190]

Reading the comments reveals a lot about the people who watch YT videos.... THIS VIDEO IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL AUDIENCE NOT FOR ENGINEERS! If you throw Thermodynamics, aerodynamics, work, energy, momentum at the common mortal, he will stop watching. This is a well explained PRINCIPLE of how jet engines work! It is well spoken and shows in a simple way how this works.

[@Rwalt61]

A good example of turboshaft engines are the RR/Allison 250C engines that power the MD500 or Bell Jet Ranger helicopters, a sweet sound on start-up, I must say.

[@sajjadhossain2497]

Very informative and eloquent. Thanks

[@icon520]

THIS IS A TRUE, INSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE, I LOVE IT, AND ALL A JEWEL OF KNOWLEDGE WITH AERO SPACE TECHNOLOGY ...

[@JK-sh2ij]

Great vid. Absolutely rocking comb-over.

[@leokimvideo]

Everything goes in the inlet of the engine, the rain, the snow, the ice AND the birds 🤕

[@jeromewesselman4653]

Not if the cats get em first! Yummm

[@supersst838]

mostly air though

[@sharoncassell9358]

That's what you call the sh*t hitting the fan. It's for the birds.

[@skivvy3565]

The history of the jet engine is actually fascinating, especially when you consider it was turned down for years during the war and the developer had basically no funding and had to work in a derelict workshop

[@ghostdance56]

Actually it was the Nazi's who developed the jet engine. No one else on earth even knew the technology existed.

[@TheLuminousOne]

Awesome video. Modern videos can't compete.

[@orunabho]

What a comprehensive lecture. Marvelous to say the least. 🎉🎉🎉

[@kpec3]

Jet engines don't suck! I love them...

[@aaronwith2950]

Lol they do but, that's not the way your meaning. (Suck, squeeze, bang, blow)

[@ELCADAROSA]

Oh, no ... Jet engines do suck! And they blow! 😁

[@kpec3]

@@ELCADAROSA 😂

[@Nurhaal]

Surprised at some of the terms. Perhaps I'm just younger and there's newer terms now? The After Burner is also called a 'Reheat'. The after burned section is sometimes referred to as a 'Flame Tube' or 'Reheat Section' or 'Reheat Tube', since it's literally just a tube. An empty can. Though it does use a jacket. The C-D Nozzel exit is also called an 'Ejector'. If the C-D nozzle is a variable one its a 'Variable CD Ejector'. Flame holders are briefly gone over here and I don't know if the description was adequate? The Flame Holdsr purposely causes turbulent air that spirals and stalls, for mixing and for maintaining the flame. Air that is super sonic will blow out the flame. Why? Because the Flame can only ignite so fast - there are two terms here, Flame front and Flame Propagation. It might surprise people to know but... for those of us Americans whom love our guns? We can tell you that we actually prefer slower burning powder better than faster powders for the charge. The slower power allows pressure to build and ultimate leads to better performance of muzzle velocities in most cases. The jet engine is no different. We are simply shooting a stream of air out the barrel instead of a bullet. The limit, though, is in reverse. If the air + fuel mixture can only propagate the flame front so quickly, then we need to slow down the air that's being ignited like we want to reduce the burn rate of an charge for a bullet. If we don't, the air will be moving too fast and out run the speed in which the flame propagates, and thus you have a flame out. Flame holders are of use in Combustion Chambers as well, depending on the engine. They're primarily to agitate and cause turbulence for more adequate mixing. The CD variable Nozzle and the Tube jacket are not just for accelerating or decelerating the ejected air stream. Ambient pressure can cause back pressure to occur and the bleed air from the jacket, provided by the bypass air, as well as the use of the variable nozzle ejector, all try to balance out that possible back pressure to ensure more efficient 'ejection' of the air stream. Remember, your goal is to not only throw as much air out the back as possible, Thrust = MxA of course... but you also want to make sure that you're imparting as much of that thrust to the engine's structure itself. It makes no use if you're throwing out so much thrust but have the thrust be diluted due to going off in all directions. You want to make sure all that thrust is pushing on your engine in the one, singular direction so that you're getting the maximum physical reaction out of that thrust mass.

[@gaoxiaen1]

Would you want a faster-burning powder for short-barreled handguns?

[@Kennedyumale]

Thanks for this wonderful explanation.

[@MASTERETALKS]

Thanks for this informative tutorial.

[@srthebox4946]

This explains a very complicated concept in a very easy to understand way without glossing over information

[@anthonyxuereb792]

Rolls Royce employed three spools on their large engines if I'm not mistaken=Low-Intermediate-High pressure.

[@jackholman5008]

Got it from GE

[@andyharman3022]

The Concorde engines were 3-spool. Bristol Olympus.

[@anthonyxuereb792]

@@andyharman3022 Thanks

[@krishnannarayanan8819]

The Trent 1000

[@aaronwith2950]

Are there any that used 4 spools?

[@joshuaking1516]

A really good documentary .one which I enjoyed watching a lot

[@skycorrigan6511]

What year was this made? It's so fascinating to me to see these older videos

[@FractAlkemist]

Excellent video! Explained so much in detail and easy to follow. Best I’ve seen of all the youtube jet videos. Yet the one question I’ve had for years remains unanswered. With a rocket, it’s easy to see that the combustion gases push against the rocket nozzle itself, thus transferring thrust to the superstructure. With a turbojet, ALL the videos and explanations just say “Newtons Law”, gas jets out the back and gives forward thrust. But exactly WHAT is the exhaust gas “pushing against”? The best I can imagine is most is pushing against the forward structures of the combustion chambers, and a good portion is also effectively pushing against the compressed air at the last stage of the compressor. I imagine the compressed air forms a stationary front, just aft of the final blade wheel. And since exhaust gas cant really ‘push’ against air (another gas), it is actually the spinning compressor blades “generating” the “thrust” as they maintain 20-40 ATM compressed air pressure. Thus the “thrust” is actually ultimately generated in the main rotor itself, and transferred to the superstructure by the bearing system. I recall on commercial flights, at takeoff, the engines whine higher and higher and higher - then there’s a sudden ‘boom’ and solid roar - I think that is the stationary compressed air front forming and reaching static equilibrium with the combustion front. Anyone can comment on this?

[@derrickwilliams1902]

I learned a lot from this lecture.

[@scudfarcus4343]

This video has orders of magnitude more instructive value than all of the turbo encabulator videos put together.

[@deanschulze3129]

One question I have about this explanation is why the combustion exhaust all seems to go out the exhaust. The combusting gases would go in all directions, so some would go forward too.

[@to-tt7fc]

Nothing better than this. I call the approach Simplistic Conceptualization. Offfical term ? Everything is good but the concept is even clearer when slowly emphasizes that in supersonic mode, the convergent/divergent principle is reverse. Also air enters into the engine front end needs to be subsonic. That explains why the nozzle throat is that way and why the nozzle opens in after-burner (supersonic) mode.

[@famousbangla7689]

Yes Boss! Every action has a same reaction.

[@murugan_kovai]

This channel deserves multi million subscribers..

[@noArguments]

I really happy to got recomendation from KZbin for this video only. 🔥🔥

[@kennethdefreitas3120]

This is great I learned a lot 💯👍🏾

[@xXDiver12Xx]

This video explains literally IT ALL!!!!!

[@sl6840]

I love instructional videos like this, and especially this authority voice :D

[@1089S]

Outstanding presentation!

[@supersst838]

nice presentation of axial combustolators

[@bhuuthesecond]

Good watch. Learned a lot. Didn’t know all those veiny outside tubes carry lubricant and air. And how a turbojet engine basically has one moving part lol. Though I wonder how the pneumatic starter gets it’s energy?

[@Yabbagabbagool]

wow this is super easy to understand thanks!

[@MichuNeo]

39:53 British vs American moment ;) Great video, cheers!

[@jmhowlett]

Great video, his explanation of how a jet engine works has really helped me understand why jet engines takes thousands and thousands of gallons of kerosene for a 5 hour flight to cross the country. Plus once the plane is high up in the sky in a oxygen rich environment it takes more fuel to burn hotter.........Gosh, no wonder why jets are so expensive, it's because they are more complex than a combustion engine car.

[@knocksensor3203]

I thought high up in the sky , was oxygen Deficient 🤔

[@jmhowlett]

@@knocksensor3203 your right, my mistake lol. That's why they have the oxygen masks fall down in an emergency, and down close to the ground is where all the oxygen settles.

[@RaimoJackson]

Great document!

[@westoniii]

I'm gonna fall asleep so hard to this later. Thanks for the upload, excel spreadsheet videos stopped working after a while.

[@jerrynakoja4331]

Great lecture I love it

[@davidkartwright9003]

Using a bullet recoil as an example of jet propulsion ... nice

[@Tiagomottadmello]

Very, very cool vídeo ! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@10000words1]

That cop really looks like he means business

[@jg-bd3hr]

It’s an oldie but a goodie.

[@AluminumOxide]

It was made in 1988!

[@halamish1]

Excellent presentation

[@horstebreedow8608]

I learnt a lot from this video, I thank I'll be a jet mechanik

[@Mia-di9nx]

Very pleased that this was recommended to me 👌

[@danedgar1539]

Found it! I watched this when I was in high school and have been looking for it for a long time!

[@hatchsyoutube]

A visually, educationally great presentation! one constructive criticism: there seems to be a conspicuous absence of any information on the turbo encabulator. Otherwise though, it’s Huell-Hauser-level gold :)

[@gaoxiaen1]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_encabulator

[@faizalhana2285]

this one here is truly a gem

[@phrodendekia]

I did not know all this engineering wass behind my F100 engine. What a noble pickup truck 😂😂

[@dineshsingh-gb6un]

Esme Sara khel right quantity of fuel (input )+ parts aceept that input without any problem , and exhaust and sound comes in a right sequence

[@bobikzielarz]

I need this video because i am building a mig and flying to the edge of the armosphere.

[@tonygovender3805]

Thank thank , this is an excellent video.

[@daniellong415]

Im 47 years old and today watched this for the first time. Call me a slow starter!

[@AngryHybridApe]

Are there any videos of compression test only using simulated spin up?

[@djackmanson]

I thought for a second this would be a sales pitch for people who wanted to generate inverse reactive current for unilateral phase detractors

[@andyharman3022]

Using cardinal grammeters, no doubt.

[@01menyou]

What would happen in a vacuum? On the earth, the issuing thrust pushes against the atmosphere. In a vacuum, what does the thrust push against?

[@Triple_J.1]

It doesn't have to "push against" anything. In a vacuum, a rockets fuel and oxidizer is burned and converted to hot gasses which expand and are propelled through a nozzle. The acceleration of the propellant mass creates an equal and opposite reaction that is thrust. A Jet engine (turbine engine) is an air breathing internal combustion engine and it cannot operate in a vacuum. Only a rocket that brings along its own oxidizer can operate in the vacuum of outer space.

[@01menyou]

@@Triple_J.1 I realise the difference between a rocket and a jet. My question is about the action of the thrust. The thrust is a gas and so pushes in all directions at once. Inside the engine against the internal surfaces, and outside against the atmosphere. The fire hose in the video shows the reaction of the operators, to the reaction of the water hitting the atmosphere. My misunderstanding, is that in a vacuum the thrust would empty into nothingness. I've seen a video of a balloon powered, toy car. When released the car shot off, as you'd expect, across the floor. However, when a vacuum cleaner hose was directed across the balloon's discharge flow the car remained still. The thrust was sucked away and the reaction to move the toy lost.

[@mytube001]

The exhaust gases are thrown out of the engine backwards. Momentum is always conserved, so an equal momentum is imparted to the engine in the exact opposite direction - forward. No atmosphere needed. The jet engine needs air to operate, but that air can come from a tank and then the engine would operate fine outside of an atmosphere (the air tank would not be practical at all, but that's an engineering problem, not a physics problem).

[@01menyou]

@@mytube001 OK. Imagine it would be possible to engage reverse thrust while the plane was stationary. Which direction would the plane roll?

[@alext8828]

@@01menyou No. You got that a little wrong. If you sit in your office chair and throw books at your co-worker, your chair (if it's on a nice smooth floor) will move the other way. Did you think those books were pushing on the atmosphere? That "reaction" is what pushes a jet engine forward. They decided not to throw books out the window so they throw hot gas out instead. It's one of the most important and misunderstood principles in physical science.

[@m.alfatehmurkaz7247]

Very informative

[@joydasgupta9445]

Where can I found the full series? What's the name of the professor?

[@avitor500]

Yeah, that would be great to find the full series.

[@andyharman3022]

This was a video shown to new Pratt & Whitney employees for training. Late 1980's would be my guess.

[@DrHarryT]

I love how every jet mechanics instruction represents the gases flowing out of the end with speed represents thrust. Exactly what is thrust? It is the pressure [rated in pounds] opposite the escaping gasses induced on the case of the engine which is then transferred to the airframe or whatever it is mounted to. The "reaction" is the escaping gasses not "action" The "action" is the expanding ignited fuel that causes expansion. The compression compounds the air [oxidizer] into a smaller space in the "combustion chamber" thereby amplifying the pressure is said combustion chamber. The combustion chamber is connected to the body [framework] of the engine and subsequently whatever the engine is connected to. The pressure inside the combustion chamber is equal everywhere except the end where the exhaust gases escape. There is a pressure resistance penalty on the exhaust side of the combustion chamber to drive the compressor shaft turbine. Nevertheless even with the pressure penalty the pressure in the combustion chamber is equal except for the escape end [exhaust] of the chamber. This means that the pressure in the combustion chamber is equal on the sides of the chamber but the pressure being much greater on the front of the chamber creates an opposing force with respect to the intake/exhaust ends of the chamber causes the chamber which physically connected to the airframe though the body of the engine to move forward. The volume and speed of the gas flowing out the back of the engine is just a representation of how much pressure is being generated in the combustion chamber after the compressor turbine penalty and is therefore just a byproduct. Again the action is the ignition of the fuel in a confined space causing gasses to expand. As in a gun the equal and opposite "reaction" is twofold where the gun pushes back and the bullet [mass linked to the exhaust gases via a barrel] is ejected from the end of the barrel.

[@ChoChan776]

It really just depends on what frame of reference you're using. If you're viewing the entire engine as a "black box" from the outside, then gases exiting the engine are indeed the action, with force on the engine and in turn the airframe are the reaction. Of course if you break it down further and look into the combustion chamber you can call the gases exiting the chamber the "reaction" to the "action" of burning the fuel. In the same way you could consider the gases impacting the turbine blades an "action" and the turbine rotating a "reaction". In the end it is exactly as the video describes. It's not a complex problem. Exhaust gas velocity must exceed desired vehicle speed to impart acceleration. Without that excess of exhaust gas speed, you will never get any thrust.

[@christincherian4315]

Can you give an idea about the actuator variant for operating the 3 stage VGWing and VIGW

[@pabloalvarez8737]

I love this Jewel 💎

[@RGWv]

Do you have a presentation for a turbo-prop engine such as the PT-6?

[@lawneymalbrough4309]

This is morw than I was taught in m1 abrams mecha ics class. It's turbin engine puts out 1500 horsepower.

[@joe18425]

That thumbnail though. I keep thinking is rik mayall 👁👄👁