Jinnah and Hindutva's Origins Narrative of Muslims in India - A Book of Conquest -

[@shivangawasthi]

PM Narendra Modi never called Indian Muslims as 'outsiders'. However, those who enter our (Indian) borders illegally, be it from Bangladesh or any other country for that matter, are aptly termed outsiders. What else should they be called? Conquerers?

[@ronaldofanclub9417]

😂But why?? Prove it why would people go to India?? Pakistanis, bangalis and even Indians go to Europe Illegially.

[@shivampatil23]

​​@@ronaldofanclub9417 ask your East Pakistani brothers 😊 Who, kicked your army in 1971 😂

[@ShwetaRoy_22]

Maybe you didn't hear his election campaign speeches.

[@shivampatil23]

@ShwetaRoy_22 mamta didi bangali should shut up on this topic. Not a single election took place without BLOOD BATH in WB.

[@adarshwanderer5704]

He did call Indian Muslims outsiders

[@AA12434]

Hidutva is major movement that has united hindus across caste. This is why muslims are afraid of hindutva. Remembers, this motherland was divided by muslims because hindus were weak and divided. Rise above your caste and unite as Indians. Dont make mistakes our ancestors made.

[@sabrinakhan8217]

To begin with, there was no Indian motherland before the British and no Hindusthan before Ghouri. South Asia is a region like Europe and never a natural country. Tell us under whose rule Nagaland, Tamil Nadu, Kerela, Mizoram, Manipur, Kashmir, Sindh, Gujrat, Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, etc, were one nation? NEVER! What do these regions have in common? NOTHING. They don't even understand each other language and culture if you remove English and British given cinemas. Even today, British given armies are keeping this unnatural Ekta at gunpoint. The very word India is a European invention, just like they invented the word Africa. The word Indoo aka Hindu was a Persian invention given to people of Indus Sindh ( now in Pakistan). There's no Hindu or Indus valley at the East of Sindh. You are Gangudeshis, who were always attacked and plundered by the kingdoms of Northwest ( current Pakistan) like Maurya, Kushan, Dahir, Ghouri, Abdalli, Ghaznavi etc. Don't forget that 1.5 provinces out of 4 of current Pakistan were part of Afghanistan and were taken by the British on a 100-year lease. Mauryans alone killed 30 million Ganga Jamnis. Ask your history from oppressed South Indians. They hated the Indus Valley and its kings and refused to call themselves "Hindus" until Indra Gandhi bombed Tamil Tigers twice. I am not even going to talk about the Burmese, Chinese, and Tibet regions of so-called Northeast India captured by the British. Its a no go zone for over 70 years for even "Indians" and under strict surveillance. It was Mahmood Ghouri who named his newly acquired land Hindusthan and its over 50 polytheist nations as Hindus. The term Bharat and Hindu nationalism were concocted by Vivekananda, Dayananda, Gowalker; Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj, Hindu-Maha-Saba, RSS, VHP, etc., in the late 1800s, A new identity and history were invented by making wild, hegemonic, and fraudulent claims over the history, religions, and civilizations of historically, culturally, racially, religiously, and linguistically separate South Asian nations. Under neo-Brahmanist ideology, all of southasia under British rule was fantasized as their 10,000 year old “One Hindu Nation" Bharat where Brahmins are ruling class.

[@amish2394]

yeah thats why rss has never had any dalit chief ever, and rss refused to hoist national flag after independence, you rss members are no1 castiest on earth, why did your savarkar foormed govt with jinnah, did you know shyama prasad mukherjee was in the govt of muslim league in bengal, infact savarkar supported 2 nation theory, plus arent u ashamed of some british bootlicker sarvakr

[@navneetparmar3084]

Kuch bhi 😂 savarkar aur jinnah ne kitni provinces me milke coalition ki sarkar bnayi thi congress ke khilaf? Kitni baar savarkar jinnah ke defence pe aya ? Google kr pta chlega ,Hindu mahasabha ne khulke british ko support diya quit India movement ko khtm krne me shyama prashad jaiso ni letter like the viceroy ki kaise crush kiya ja skta hai movement ko aise he valabh bhai patel ne ban nhi lgaya, kiya kya in groups ne desh ki azadi ki liye ? aur kyu jab subhas bose jab president bne unhone clear ban lgaya koi hindu mahasabha jaise communal groups ka member hoga usko congress se nikal diya jayega , bhagat singh ne bhi clear ban rkha tha aise groups pe , koi to reason hoga in sanpo ko door rkhne ka , mai koi dogla admi nhi hoon Islam aur violence ka direct relation hai mai manta hoon aur hindutva Islam ki sasti copy hai mera dhrm vasudevaya kutumbkum wala hai ye Hindu rastra tumhara sasta jihad hai usi ki ghatia nakal hai ,to khudko koi top na smjhna pakistan barbad hua kyunki state ne religion ke bhrose power retain krne ki koshish kri , inlogo ne pehle Hinduo ko mara phir bangla ko phir pakistani baluch pathan sindhi ho gye ab ahmdiya shia aur bhi pta nhi kya kya ye nafrat rukti nhi hai transform hoti chli jati hai to is galat fehmi me mat rehna hindutva ne kisi ko unite kiya , bajrang dal koi gau rakshak koi kuch modi ne khud gau rakshak ko gunde mawali aur smaj ko khtra btaya tha u tube pe video dekh le

[@Ja_Ni287]

​@@navneetparmar3084and u believe that we got freedom by quite india movement?? U don't even know why hindus mahasabha didn't supported Gandhi's quite india movement but blabbering nonsense 🤦🤦🤦🤦

[@gytsixp]

Bull SHIT

[@gouravgarg3791]

Okay so Jinna demanded separate nation because of Gandhi and Nehru's Hindutva far right policies.. right?

[@RahulYadav-fz2xc]

Iska koi jawab hi nahi de rahe bhai 😂

[@amish2394]

he didnt even said that, kuch bhi tum gobarkhor bhok dete ho

[@kanika0846]

@@gouravgarg3791 bolti band 😂

[@shubhamjain2312]

Nehru was a staunch critique of hindutva and far right ideas. First read about him.

[@GSR356]

All the duckHeads will go silent now 😂

[@sanjaychauhan1116]

Bro RSS and other hindu groups openly tells that indian muslims were converted, they are not mughals but the I$lamist and left parties tells them ,no mughals were ur ancestors and they ruled hindus for 800 yr ( u should watch videos of owaisi and glorification of mughals, invaders who destroyed our temples). Here majority of muslims thinks that there ancestors were mughals and they praise them and call indian hindu culture ,ancient architecture as inferior. Tum apne country me jo log gazani and others ko hero mante hai unko criticise karte ho but wahi hum yaha kare to hum facist ban jate hai. Edits : In this video i see that he is not replying to most liked comments who are challenging his narratives with facts, bas lallu pallu ko reply kar k apne aap ko khus karta hai ki mai hi correct hu .whether its pakistani liberals or extremist , they will never accept that there is a problem with teachings of i$lam that its a war mongering religion,it doesn't respects other religion, its anti women religion .More than 90% muslims majority countries are non democratic and they doesn't give freedom to other religion to practice and preach their religiin. We hindus 🚩and indians 🇮🇳 are the biggest victims of their cult

[@WTF_whatthefootball]

the fact that wrote i$lamists instead of islamists tells alot about ur mentality

[@QabilAGhor]

There is no doubt that there are MANY Muslims in both India and Pakistan whose ancestors came from Afghanistan and Central Asia. This was due to three reasons: First Muslim armies from various dynasties brought hundreds of thousands of soldiers from Afghanistan and Central Asia who eventually settled down in the Subcontinent. The second reason was that Muslim dynasties encouraged immigration from these areas, and the new immigrants were given land grants as an incentive. Finally, the Mongol invasion of Central Asia and the Middle East forced many Muslims to seek shelter in the Subcontinent.

[@QabilAGhor]

My own DNA analysis shows that I have 21% non-Subcontinent DNA, including Afghan, Central Asian, Arab, Persian, Anatolian and Levantine DNA. Keep in mind that as people keep marrying within one country, the percentage of foreign DNA is halved with every generation. For example, if a Persian man marries an Indian woman, their children would have only 50% Persian DNA, grandchildren 25%, and great grandchildren on 12.5%. After 7th or 8th generation, that Persian DNA wouldn't show up in any test, but the haplogroup, which is rare in India, could still show a foreign male ancestor.

[@InfiniteForce1]

​@@QabilAGhorput it simply... tere ammi ne badey maje liye... Bahut logo ne usko khoda 😂😂😂

[@hello64879]

No need to care Dharmik people are son of the soil under whom India's contribution in world GDP was around 32-35% Those invaders from outside dropped that to 24-26% Than British looters made that only 2% of world GDP Dharmik culture is true culture of Indian subcontinent Desert creatures just came to loot our money

[@seeker911]

If the stories of Muslim persecution was fabricated, there would have been still sizeable number of Hindus in Sindh and Pakistan as is the case with Muslims in India. Zia was the end product of the process set in motion by radical and highly fanatical Muslim religious and political leaders such as Shah Walliullah, Dehalavi, Syed Ahmed Khan, Iqbal, Jinnah and many more Muslim intellectuals who wanted to become the leader of the Ummah. They laid the foundation of hate on which Zia built his anti Hindu and anti India narrative. Just ask yourself one question. Would Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan have been as highly religiously fanatical and socially backward as a society if it's population would have been Parsi, Jews, Hindu, Buddhist or Jain.

[@Yalla12347]

Maybe yes and maybe no. You have not experienced communist powers ridding you of your culture and beliefs to the core. You have not experienced a nation wide shut down of your temples and murder for things like wearing a bindi. If this had happened to you while you were in Afghanistan and Pakistan, either you would have abandoned your cultural and religious identity and embraced it or you would have clutched to fundamentals and have been radicalised to fight of the powers. No matter what invasions you mention, you can not compare the Indian experience to the bloodshed and brutality of those in central Asia. People in Pakistan consequently experienced the radicalisation as a innate defence mechanism when they felt that anything and everything that was linked to their religious identity. That is true that had USSR not been controlled till Afghanistan, they without a doubt would have entered Pakistan. Please note when I mentioned communism earlier I was not solely talking about Russia’s invasion of Afghanistan but in fact the impact of the communist ideology. Buddhists are peaceful people. We have clearly seen them being radicalised and decimate civilians in Myanmar.

[@jahangirkhan9803]

The number of Hindus in Sindh In 47 they were 8 lak and now 60 lak

[@shivampatil23]

@@seeker911 TRUE 👍

[@DataCrusade1999]

What you're doing is called post fact rationalization. You deliberately picked Muslim majority country to justify your line of thinking. But what do you have to say about Myanmar where Buddhist orchestrated a mass deletion campaign against Rohingya Muslims. There goes your theory of Islam begin inherently bad.

[@zakymalik6920]

😂😂😂 Shah Waliullah Muhmmad Iqbal and Sir Syed Ahmad Khan extremist seriously 😂😂😂

[@balendrasingh2696]

There're no parsis in Persia.. tells everything about invaders not trying to convert the population.. Abrahamic religions are not ours, our religions are those originated in our region like hinduism buddhism jainism sikhism etc..

[@TheFinlandanand]

Parsis are Zoroastrians. There are plenty of them in Iran.

[@balendrasingh2696]

@TheFinlandanand plenty of? 0.033 percent of total population 🙄 that too according to 2011 census.. There are more zorastrians in India than in iran.. 😂

[@TheFinlandanand]

You are right here of course. Not plenty. But not none. That was all I was reacting to.

[@balendrasingh2696]

@@TheFinlandanand Imagine a country where your religion was 100% and now you've to run to some other countries to save yourself.. and some people saying atleast 0.03 percent of population is still there.. Imagine if I had to face 0.03 percent of hindu population in India. Or Muslims had to run from Saudi Arabia..

[@MuhammadAzhar-v3d]

Everyone is free to believe in what one wants to. So, it does not matter if that concept is native or not .

[@rajveergaur6607]

Do a survey and majority of Hindus will say that muslims living in India are native to this land and converted during Mughal or other central asian rulers. And oppose to it majority muslims will claim they are descended of Mughals, Turks, Afgan, central asian come to India as rulers.😅

[@Ajay_GangadharSingh]

@@rajveergaur6607 in which period the indian subcontinent was being rule by a ruler living in Central Asia..!?

[@sujeetsingh9032]

@@Ajay_GangadharSingh Mughal central asian hi the

[@Ajay_GangadharSingh]

@@sujeetsingh9032 Uzbek the... Humare reply ko thik se padho

[@sujeetsingh9032]

@@Ajay_GangadharSingh 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Uzbekistan central asia me hi aata hai. Bhai aap great ho apna checkup jaroor karalo.

[@socratology]

Brahmin are outsiders they accept it... Buddhists (dalits) and are native.. when will leave their land..😅

[@RS-mp7so]

Ye 26/11 ko bolte hai bahot bura huwa,lekin hafiz shaheed ko terrorist nahi bolte, o isliye nahi bolte hai kyo ki har pakistani 26/11 andar se happy fill karte hai.

[@TruthPrevailz]

Yea jihad lagta hai inko killing innocents. Like imran khan called Osama Shaheed. Shows the filthy mindset of pakistans elite.

[@Yalla12347]

Tum sathya gaye ho agar tumhay yeh lagta hai.

[@nimeshmarker]

Strange why do most Pakistanis attempt to equate Hindu nationalists with Islamic nationalism? And are all Hindus nationalists? As a non fanatical Hindu I never had an issue with Indian muslims. Except when Pakistanis attempting to drum beat that they are the spokesperson for all Indian Muslims? And this is after Jinnah plainly dumped the Indian Muslims without a credible leadership in modern India. Why should we even care what Islamic governance or Islamic rulers were trying to impose on India who they ruled for a short period? Please try and stop trying to paint how entire India was rosy under Islamic governance and Hindus, Muslims and everyone was all peachy, it was not and was rejected.

[@DKS-75]

To begin with we as Indians never wanted the country to be divided but now I feel it was done for the better. Muslims in general and Muslims from the Indian subcontinent in particular have shown that they can't live in equal footing with people from other faiths, if they are in the majority. When the country was divided Muslims accounted for 20% of the overall population, if you take the figures now from the 3 countries they account for over 33% ; and it is for sure if you look at the population growth numbers of Muslims in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, Hindus would surely have become in minority by the end of this century.

[@yashsingh0010]

Hindus dont say Muslims are outsiders, but the problem is they are not following the culture of India, Burkha is not India it is Arabian. Just like Tajikistan reject Burkha similarly, Burkha is not Indian. Follow Indian culture if you Indian.

[@rudraksh04]

Bro i don't know about sindh's history but i'm from haryana india and there are folk songs about the abuses and violence done by Mughals to local hindus specifically about aurangzeb. One song i will recomend you is (jaat lutere ragini) it is haryanvi language so it will be dificult for you to understand but i think you listen to it. And you should also research about kalanor's (haryana) history that is mentioned in the ragini as well In yesterdays podcast and in many other previously done podcasts you and sometime the guests try to humanise the mugals but except akbar no mugal ruler was secular some just collect jazia tax from non muslims but some did much worse than that. The whole militarization of sikhism was also because of the atrocities of auranzeb. That is why i think you should reflect the way you see the mugal empire. I dont know the situation of pakistan people but my region' people always thought that were oppressed even before the british came and that was the reason of formation of sikh umpire under maharaja ranjit singh and the jat state of bharatpur under maharaja sujarmal and the maratha umpire under shivaji and i think these people were the first freedom fighters of india. By the way i'm only 19 so i have much to study still and i welcome your opinion as well if you read this comment. Love your work and i hope and wish that our countries will have a peaceful relationship in future

[@maryamw-d7l]

I apologize on the behalf of those Muslims who oppressed your community. They definitely weren't following the Islamic way of ruling people. I know mughal empire wasn't perfect (no ruling party is) but oppression is never acceptable in Islam. Which is probably the reason for the downfall of the empire. I don't see anything wrong with humanizing humans. Instead of dehumanizing them we can hold them accountable for thier wrongdoings (if they're alive) or learn from thier actions.

[@ShwetaRoy_22]

Mughals expanded their empire they came to India by defeating and killing Muslims. It's geopolitical war not religious war.

[@rudraksh04]

@maryamw-d7l No worries . I as a hindu also believe that if a muslim does something bad that does not make the islam bad. Islam just like any religion is a way of living life peacefully and living life the right way and i also know that what Mughals did had nothing to do with islam and it had nothing to do with you that is why you don't need to apologize for anything that you didn't do.

[@vlmeda]

God bless you kid. At such young age if you can express like this I am happy for my Bharath.

[@rudraksh04]

@@ShwetaRoy_22 i am not saying that what did was religious to them or that it had anything to do with islam . I am simply sharing the history of my people and the history i am talking about is from the time when they were ruling not from the time they were conquering.

[@kratosgod-ci4tq]

I'm always baffled by how out of touch with reality pakistan's intellectual class is. Ofcourse Pakistan is in the state it is in right now.

[@arifsaleem5467]

So are we, so baffled that how out of touch with reality most Hindus are and they still believe that Hinduism is more than seventeen hundred years old.

[@arifsaleem5467]

I also wonder how far from reality all Hindus are and how they still believe that Hinduism is more than seventeen hundred years old despite the fact that Hinduism was invented centuries after the decline of Buddhism in the region.

[@kanika0846]

@@kratosgod-ci4tq trueee

[@Yalla12347]

This is coming from someone that believes the entire world was hindu and then people just changed it.

[@arifsaleem5467]

@Yalla12347 They also believe that vedas are older than the universe, they claim that the traces of pre BigBang vedas are embedded in the CMBR.

[@trilokyamohanchakra6351]

1:04 LoL, Pakistan was made for muslims, Hindutva is about preserving Hindusthan and stopping Gazwa-e-Hindh, how can they be same!? Never 2:02 koi bhi indian subcontinent ke muslim se poocho woh bhi yehi bolenge ki, " hum toh ji arab hain"

[@ShwetaRoy_22]

Indian subcontinent m kaunse Arab hai . India ko to Turks and mongol n conquer Kiya tha Arabs kahan s aa jayenge

[@priyakanjilal7748]

Khud ko arabic bolne walon ko khud Arabi nhi aati. Aur quran wo translation se padhte h ya maulviyon se😂😂😂

[@ronaldofanclub9417]

@@ShwetaRoy_22 Yes Qasim was an Arab, but yes mostly were Turks who can be called Mongols, Turks are from Mongol race.

[@ronaldofanclub9417]

Arab hay Nalaik, Arbi aati nahi Arab hay. Is Tarha to may Mughal hon, mughay Farsi, ya Turki nahi ati to may abhi apnay ap ko Turk kahon?? I am from Quetta and we have Uzbeks here who speak corrupted Turkish, we dont even call them Turks, we call them Uzbeks. In balochistan here, we have balochs here who are actually from Arab race, but we dont even call them Arabs, we call them Balochs. Is terha dekho to sarray Insaan Admi hay kukay pehla Insaan wo tha. If you call yourself with Past races then you are a NALAIK.

[@ronaldofanclub9417]

@@priyakanjilal7748 Indeed

[@yashsrivastava5486]

Just Visit temples of Kashi ,Mathura and Ayodhya and you can see how much Muslims invaders/rulers loved hindu temples. And please also read about the havoc ransacked by Baktiyar khilji in Nalanda University and how much ilm and Wisdom was lost their.Its a pity that BJP have not even changed the name of the city Baktiyarpur , named literally after the person who rained fire in that place.

[@lanoklom9697]

Please provide a list of temples broken down by Hindu rulers? The list will be endless. The breaking of temples was part of Hindu culture, hence why invaders continued it. Temples were never broken in Ancient Egyptian culture, hence despite completer takeover of Egypt all their ancient temples are still there.

[@yashsrivastava5486]

@lanoklom9697 yes,kingdoms in different parts of India were at lockhorns with each other ,but there is almost no evidence of hindu rulers destroying temples especially descreting idols which are of more importance and value to us .South Indians are mostly Shviates and North Indians are mostly Vaishanavi ,but idol worshipping is common in all india . Hindus are polytheists and idol worshipping isn't a sin .And everybody know how much intolerant in islam towards idol worshippers.And there are plenty of other places of worships of other religions which are descreted or turned into mosques going towards west of India .Just google the kashi Vishwanath temple and the pics will show how much Islamists are tolerant to our temples.

[@yashsrivastava5486]

@lanoklom9697 And islam cannot at any level can mix up with culture of India or the tribal or regional traditions .India to its core is very polytheistic in every way and islamic elite cannot under the garb of British rule could place islamic rulers of India as pious for Hindus .There is way too much evidence and grief that defies it.

[@lanoklom9697]

​@@yashsrivastava5486 All cultures have moved passed paganism, idolatry and superstitions (except for yours). Buddhism and Sikhism evolved out of these ancient practices, while cultures outside of Indian, when unable to find answers, have even chosen Atheism.

[@advancecsinterviewquestion7155]

lol, if you represent intellectual class of pakistan and muslims then there are no hopes for Quam,

[@priyakanjilal7748]

Can a muslim ever be truthful towards the true history of bharat

[@amish2394]

do pajeet can be truthful about their attitude towards shudras, and about destroying buddhism

[@priyakanjilal7748]

@amish2394 😂😂 typical ignorant talk. Carry on the rant . Suits you completely. You are a muslim who uses the name Amish to sound oh so Hindu. But alas ...gets caught

[@indian9428]

@@amish2394 King Siddhartha was born Hindu kshatriya and you can practice your faith in Land of Hindu's whom you are calling pajeets .. In Muslim nation you are kaffir just like all others see what is happening in Bangladesh with Budhist .. and try to practice Teachings of King Siddhartha Gautama in Muslim land and then you will realize were you are safe and BTW im also an OBC i have never seen any so called uppercast treating me like what pak Hindus are treated ..

[@AbhaySingh-qb1td]

​@@amish2394nice try mujeet ohh sorry saar half Arab,Aalf Turk, Aalf mangol, 🤣 btw you are also shudra ‼️

[@Ajay_GangadharSingh]

@@priyakanjilal7748 never everrrrr....!!!

[@momobhai3792]

Why do you guys form your opinions about hindutva from non-hindutvavadis and leftists? Its like learning about islam from "ex-muslims" on the internet. Some recommendations; 1) Dayanand saraswati 2) Bal tilak 3) Veer savarkar 4) Sitaram goel & Ram Swaroop 5) Konrad Elst 6) J sai deepak 7) Anand ranganathan These are some that i know. ✌

[@kanika0846]

@@momobhai3792 great recommendations brother! 💟

[@TruthPrevailz]

Anand is an atheist.

[@satyamgupta6986]

New Orleans attack per video banaaiye😂😂

[@shrawins]

I think you should consider. India that is Bharat and India, Bharat and Pakistan by J.S. Deepak. Excellent books and def worth the read.

[@Indus720]

Lol, He Promotes Pakistani liberal narrative and any rightwing Indian views is against Pakistan state as well as liberal narrative.

[@shrawins]

@@Indus720 best I can do is suggest. If he wants to create just another echo chamber, he is free to do so. P.s. He regularly responds to people in the comments, I have interacted with him plenty of times. So that suggests something on the contrary.

[@Indus720]

@@shrawins Ok, So try your luck and ask him to also quote from SR Goyal and KS Lal’a work on Islamic conquest on India.

[@amish2394]

lol j sai joker, your new found father, 🤣🤣🤣he spreads so much falsehood, that even a 6th grader can debunk him

[@UUuu-n4m]

​@@Indus720 pakistani and liberal These are opposite words because pakistan is an islamic republic by constitution and laws which discriminate against non muslims By the Law of the State and Government level

[@sant.76]

You can't even pronounce names of Savarkar and Golvalakar. How can you explain Hindus, your hate from childhood has closed your eyes and mind, even when you are are very liberal from Islam's perspective.

[@RajStraw]

True

[@mdadnan2831]

Jhaatu of someone can't pronounce td doesn't mean that savarkar and golvarkar was freedom fighter they were cowards hindu 😂 maafi Nama

[@chmazhariqbal]

So, your judgment is based on the fact that he can't pronounce the name? How unfortunate.

[@ajaygarwa9662]

​@@chmazhariqbalhindutva kya hai?

[@lanoklom9697]

And your daddy Major Gaurav Arya can not pronounce Muslim names nor knows anything about the religion, yet makes countless videos on it which millions of Indians watch.

[@shivampatil23]

I Gave up explaining HINDUTVA Ideology to Pakistani 😅😅 Let them cry 😂😂

[@ms10J23]

Let them be happy in fool's paradise.... Indians should treat them as kapil sharma show.

[@anuroopchatterjee1746]

Bhai tu hi is channel ki har video pe comment karta hai phir bolta hai 'i gave up' 😂

[@shivampatil23]

@anuroopchatterjee1746 I gave up explaining HINDUTVA ideology. Pura pada Karo, mere bhai ☺️

[@amish2394]

@@anuroopchatterjee1746 bhai ya nalla berozgaar hai,

[@Zainn_Aly]

read the book somnatha by romila thapar you will understand that histroy in a better way!

[@karolbagh3793]

Islamic Expansion has no permanent friends or Enemies, no permanent name or face, no permanent democracy or dictatorship (🇧🇩🇵🇰) Only Expansion is permanent.

[@henrykissinger6157]

Bjp ko kya target kr rha h , tumare heroes ki kahaniya tumne hee btai h ki hindus ke bhagwan ki murti todo

[@TruthPrevailz]

They will never accept your comment. Lol

[@chiranjiv3313]

True

[@VRM33]

Majority Muslims of Indian subcontinent are descendants of native Hindus. Foreign origin Muslims are a small fraction. May be you are of foreign origin. 😂

[@adamSmith23446]

Thank you for making us natives, now also accept our new faith, as that's our right and we are on our own land 😂

[@divyanshsharma4248]

​​@@adamSmith23446 Why we accept new faith Hamare dada pardada darkop nahi thee talwar ke daar se jinhona katna karwadiya😂😂

[@manu_thind]

​@@adamSmith23446Good argument 😀 but they still won't accept it.

[@FreddieMurphy746]

​@@manu_thindWhy should they accept it. If u have made a mistake then why should u want others to make the same mistake? Is that a way to seek validation?

[@manu_thind]

Wo toh proud sindhi hai bro, shehzad ke aur videos nahi dekhe

[@kalakhatta8652]

isko koi india se reply to sunna nhi hai to bs bolta jata hai...you want an answer invite j sai deepak

[@VELOCITYGAMING19]

iski aukat ke bhaar hai bhai deepak sir

[@Hnky_edits]

Forget it...chill. they'll try to spread what they think is right over one book rather than finding out because it is in their mindset that bjp rss is bad. Although they nothing about rss bjp...🤣 so chuck it

[@kalakhatta8652]

@VELOCITYGAMING19 agreed bro but their is no one better than j sai who can counter them

[@kalakhatta8652]

@@Hnky_edits I can give a pass for BJP coz its a political party and they will use whatever narrative necessary to get success but RSS is different

[@karolbagh3793]

ANCIENT INDIA, also known as BHARATVARSHA, encompassed a vast territory that has been reduced over time due to various invasions, empires, and colonialism. Here's a rough estimate of the territory lost: 1. Pakistan and Bangladesh: These countries were part of ancient India but were separated during the 1947 partition. 2. Afghanistan: Ancient India extended into present-day Afghanistan, but it was lost to Islamic invasions and later became a separate entity. 3. Tibet: Tibet was an integral part of ancient India, but it was annexed by China in the 18th century. 4. Nepal and Bhutan: These Himalayan kingdoms were once part of ancient India but gained independence over time. 5. Myanmar (Burma): Ancient India's territory extended into present-day Myanmar, but it was lost to the Burmese empire. 6. Sri Lanka: Although not physically connected, Sri Lanka was culturally and politically part of ancient India. 7. Parts of Central Asia: Ancient India's influence extended into present-day Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Xinjiang (China). The territory lost by ancient India is estimated to be around 20-25% of its original size. Here's a rough estimate of the original territory: - Ancient India: approximately 10 million square kilometers (3.9 million sq mi) - Present-day India: approximately 3.3 million square kilometers (1.3 million sq mi) Keep in mind that these estimates vary, and the concept of a fixed territory is complex in ancient times. Nonetheless, it's clear that ancient India's territory has been significantly reduced over the Centuries.

[@QabilAGhor]

There was NEVER any country called "India" or "Bharat" until August 15, 1947. One has to go all the way back to Mauryan Empire to come anywhere close to what is now India. But the boundaries of Mauryan Empire are simply based on names mentioned in ancient texts and it's not clear if those place-names were actually part of the empire. That is why there are many different maps of the extent of the Mauryan Empire, none of which include southern India. The word "India" is derived from the Sindhu, the Indus River, and for Persians who named it "Hind," it simply represented a region around the Indus River and beyond. This was later adopted by Arabs who then distinguished Sindh from Hindh because Sindh had become part of the Omayyad Empire. The word "Bharat" was also some region in India, like Siberia in Russia, which never had any boundaries. Even when the British ruled the Subcontinent, it was called the British Raj, Burma was part of it, and the Viceroy of India also handled affairs of the Trucial States which are now UAE, Bahrain and Qatar. The Subcontinent was always a region, like Europe, which consisted of various kingdoms, the Western regions of which were often part of the Persian Empire, Greko-Bacterian Kingdom, Omayyad Empire, and later Afghan kingdoms, all of which left their mark (and progeny) in this rich cultural mix. Since the area that is now Pakistan was closer to Afghanistan and the Middle East, it was more influenced by them, both culturally, religiously and ethnically. India always has had dozens of ethnic groups, just it had many kingdoms. To say that there was some "Hindu" ethnic group would be historically and scientifically wrong. Because of conquests and migrations (mostly due to Mongol invasions in Central Asia) ethnic makeup of the Muslim population in the Subcontinent began to change around 1000-1200 AD. It was also state policy among Muslim rulers of India to encourage Muslim immigration from Central Asia and sometimes the entire armies consisted of Mamluk soldiers. Immigrants and soldiers were given land grants, so they could survive in their adopted homeland. Over time, these immigrants married locals and were so fully assimilated into the local culture that it was hard to distinguish them from the native population. Thus the "ethnic mix" among Muslims was not the same as among the "ethnic mix" of the larger Hindu population. Since Islam rejected the notion of "caste," "Muslim" became an identity by itself. I know that both Indians and Pakistanis try to create an Indian or Pakistani identity but make a terrible mistake by confusing religion with ethnic and national identities. Each person has many MANY identities. One can be Hindu and be American, British, Indonesian, Surinamese or Guyanese. It takes hundreds or perhaps thousands of years for national identities to develop. Hardly any country now has just one ethnic or religious group. National identities are lot more complex and have to do with commonality of purpose, ideals, and culture rather than ethnicity. This is why even the UN speaks of "self-determination" rather than imposition of an identity on any group.

[@_Ironhide]

@@QabilAGhor [Vishnu Purana 2.3.1] उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य: हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम् । वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम: भारती यत्र संततिः ।। The country that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhāratam (India); there dwell the descendants of Bharata Bharat/India/Indica/Hind is a civilizational state. Always was, always will be. 12 Jyothirlingas, 51 Shakti Peeth and various Vishnava temples, Tirthas, Holy rivers, Holy cities and home to all Dharmic Beliefs in the world comprises the sacred geography of Bharat.

[@QabilAGhor]

@_Ironhide If you read the text closely, it only describes it as a region, not a country. It says, "Next hear from me, descendants of Bahrata, the names of inhabitants of different COUNTRIES it goes on to list many names). These and many other NATIONS , dwelling in the east and in the north, can be only thus briefly noticed." (Emphasis is mine).

[@jailbreaker-wz]

Can you review "Hindus in Hindu rashtra" book by Anand Ranganathan

[@Piyush-kh1rw]

I don't think he will react to it otherwise Pakistanis and Muslims will not accept the hard reality at all.

[@bronxbull]

You guys were desperate all these years to associate yourself with Mughals and Turks and Persians, now that you have failed you want to call yourself locals. When the Mohajjirs ran desperately to Karachi, they showed the world that they are outsiders.

[@subhampadhi2813]

In light of your argument emphasizing that Muslim invaders did not aim to convert Hindus or propagate Islam, I have a few pointed questions to raise: 1. If the intention was not to impose Islam, why did the majority of Muslim Invaders enforce the jizya tax on non-Muslims? 2. How do you reconcile this claim with the contrasting historical narratives from Persia, Egypt, Iraq, and other regions, where the spread of Islam often followed a distinct pattern of religious and cultural transformation? 3. What unique offerings or attributes of Islam led to voluntary conversions in India, especially when local religions already had well-established practices and philosophies? 4. If Islamic invaders were truly progressive, secular, and just, how do you explain cultural shifts such as marriages being conducted at night or the rise of practices like the ghunghat among non-Muslim communities? Do these not reflect an underlying fear or socio-cultural imposition resulting from invasions? 5. Finally, why were numerous temples destroyed and mosques constructed atop them? This practice, evident even today in some locations, seems to contradict the narrative of tolerance and progressiveness attributed to these invaders. 6. If the Muslim invaders were not intent on religious conversion, why were there instances of forced conversions documented in several historical accounts, particularly during certain rulers' reigns? How do you justify these actions within the framework of tolerance? 7. Why were Hindu and Jain places of worship targeted for destruction, while structures of other faiths, such as Buddhist monasteries, were occasionally spared? What does this selective approach signify? 8. How do you explain the systemic marginalization of non-Muslims in administrative and political roles during certain Islamic rule periods? Was this not a strategy to consolidate power and influence? 9. Why was the Sharia law implemented in governance during certain regimes, often superseding local legal systems, if the intent was not to impose an Islamic framework on the populace? 10. How do you interpret the deliberate rewriting or omission of pre-Islamic history and heritage in several chronicles by court historians? Was this an attempt to erase local identities and establish cultural dominance? 11. If Islamic invaders were indeed secular and progressive, how do you justify the large-scale slave trade, including the enslavement of women and children, often justified under the pretext of religious wars? 12. The practice of building mosques on demolished temple sites is well-documented. Was this merely an architectural preference, or does it signify a symbolic assertion of dominance over the indigenous culture? 13. What were the underlying socio-political motivations behind the classification of people as dhimmis and the associated restrictions on their religious practices? 14. How do you address the legacy of policies such as iconoclasm that were employed to dismantle deeply rooted cultural and religious symbols of the native population? According to me, it is true that a number of individuals converted to Islam through the influence of Sufi saints, whose teachings emphasized spirituality and Islamic brotherhood. Notable examples include Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, who inspired many in Rajasthan, and Sheikh Nizamuddin Auliya, who left a significant spiritual legacy in Delhi. However, historical evidence suggests that the majority of conversions were not purely voluntary. Many were driven by indirect pressures such as the imposition of jizya tax on non-Muslims, which created a financial burden, making it difficult for local populations to sustain their livelihoods. Artisans and traders, in particular, faced systemic discrimination, often being coerced to convert as a precondition for conducting business or accessing opportunities. This socio-economic marginalization, combined with the fear of exclusion and oppression, significantly contributed to the spread of Islam in several regions. And to understand this you have to study the spread of Islam around the world, and it is violent except in Indonesia. Now, addressing your argument on Hindutva, it is imperative to clarify that, barring the actions of a few miscreants, the Hindutva ideology does not assert that Indian Muslims are foreigners or Arabs. Instead, it emphasizes that everyone in India is inherently native to the land and has the right to practice their beliefs freely. However, this right is accompanied by a critical caveat: it must not undermine or harm the foundational identity of Bharat, which Hindutva regards as Hindu. It is also essential to note that within the Hindutva framework, the term "Hindu" is inclusive, encompassing Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, and others who share this cultural heritage. This interpretation aligns with the Supreme Court of India’s definition of Hindus, reinforcing the pluralistic and unifying intent of the ideology. Moreover, unlike monotheistic religions like Islam and Christianity, Hindu philosophy, according to the Rigveda says, "Ekam Sat Vipra Bahudha Vadanti." which signifies the inclusive and pluralistic philosophy of Hinduism, acknowledging that while there are various paths and interpretations, they all lead to the same ultimate reality or truth. This shloka is often cited to emphasize religious tolerance and the coexistence of diverse beliefs (also I don't fail to understand the negative parts of Hinduism, but it is in many cases more inclusive than any monotheistic religion, and also I don't believe in any GOD). One advice to you lena hai toh lena warna gaand marana, pakistaniyo ko abhi bahut time lagega reality ko samajh ne me hi and itna critical thinking karna tumhare aukat hi nahi hai, Whenever I listen to the intellectuals of Pakistan, I laugh a lot, and I wouldn't have commented on your video if it were not targeting India and Hindutva.

[@kanika0846]

@@subhampadhi2813 you're spot on bro!

[@ProNoooob97]

You explained far better than the host... ❤❤

[@RG_11_12]

"One" book in, brain out! Irrespective of region and race.

[@arpanmalik6730]

Spot on mate 👍🏻

[@sujeetsingh9032]

In gadaho ko ye baat samajh nahi aaegi, intellectual liberal muslim is basically cover for real fundamentalist muslims.

[@nitishfrankenstein4886]

1:21 And In the much loved, Dr. Ambedkar's book on pakistan. But seriously read that book,"Pakistan or the Partition of India" by Dr. Ambedkar.

[@rajveergaur6607]

Kindly Review a book- Pakistan Or The Partition Of India. by Dr B R Ambedkar.

[@sujeetsingh9032]

To muslim kahan se aaye lucknow se? Islam is an expantionary religion spread through sword. And yes muslims were originally outsiders who converted local indians. Bharat was,is and always will be a Hindu rashtra which includes all cultures originated in bharat which are Sanatan , sikh , jain, budhism, charvaka and other small and regional cultures of India. And yes though it should not have but division of Bharat was same as removing tumour from diseased body, but weak nehru couldnt even completely do the transfer of disease which will eventually come back to bite in our ,

[@BasEkKafir]

Its biting every day. Daily case of love jihad, conversion racket and terrorist attack by people belonging from shehzad ghias religion

[@anuroopchatterjee1746]

75 years and still waiting for that disease to bite our a**

[@shivampatil23]

@anuroopchatterjee1746 Which disease, are you talking about?

[@sabrinakhan8217]

Maurayans from Northwest ( current Pakistan) killed 30 million gangudeshis

[@Zainn_Aly]

this is what happens when you graduate from whatsapp university with gold medal i.e your ability to think ends here ! kya ap janta ho bohot sa hindu mahrajao na b mandir loota tha ? mandir tooda thay aur muslamano na un mandir ko tootna ka rooka tha! apko pata nai q k apki political parties apko batani nai chahti asli sach! kya ap raja sahib dutt k bare jante ho? wo aur us waqt sa musalmano k subcontinet sa trade k zariya relation tha ! jo pahla masjid india ma bana tha wo south india ma wo ek hindu raja na banaya tha jo muslim businesmen ata tha arab sa unka lia aur wo islam sa impress ho kr muslim bana aur uski janta b muslim bani abi kafi muslim talwar k zor pa hoya honga but wo rajao na srf apna sa hukumat sa wafadari badhaane k lia kia tha islia k wo log baad ma bhagawat na kare !

[@chemistryguru0007]

Yaar islam actually brutal hee he kitna jhuth bologe

[@hagemurutv2277]

Pajeet you brainwashed

[@TruthPrevailz]

Islam was spread by the sword across the globe. 100s of books on spread of islam are available

[@henrykissinger6157]

U have still muslim mindset who is against hindus , bhai hindutwa se kitni nafrat h tereko

[@ammarmubashir6568]

Koi logic ki baat karay ur tmhain pasand na aye to wo tmharay against bias hojati hai waah bhai. Isse behtar hai apna brain kholo ur truth find karo phr argument likho don’t put allegation of biaseness

[@Hnky_edits]

​@@ammarmubashir6568 obviously, yeh bjp rss narrative ki baat hai hi nahi....muslims bahar se hi aaye the! Khudko itna confuse karte ho ki pata hi nahi tumlogo kaha se aaye ho😂 is not our problem

[@VELOCITYGAMING19]

@@ammarmubashir6568 logicc🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂

[@arifsaleem5467]

​@VELOCITYGAMING19 Hanuman tried to swallow the sun, logical. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@sonusonu-qv4op]

Mohhamad fly on gadhi Miraj is logical ? ​@@arifsaleem5467

[@Indus720]

Gauri, Gazani, Nadir Shah, Bin Qasim ,Abdali and all conquerors of India and But Sikhan is hero of Pakistani youths.

[@Zainn_Aly]

then in 1026 why hindus of multan supported ghaznavi and local muslim of gujrat resisted the attack and there are various incidents where hindu kings have also attacked temple plz read the book somnatha by romila thapar

[@GSR356]

⁠@@Zainn_Alyromila thapar is fake as it can be, it’s like telling you to go and read “The Satanic Verses” as it’s reality about Muhammad.

[@Indus720]

@ I only read Naseem Hijazi and Iqbal on Sultan Gazani.

[@Zainn_Aly]

@@Indus720 naseem hijazi is considered as a fictional writer he is not real historian he has written history purely on bases of his imagination !

[@Zainn_Aly]

@@Indus720 if that is the case then please do some reasearch about who killed muhammad bin qasim!

[@indigenous_clips]

Bro I think u got it wrong.. Chachnama originally was written by Chach who was official minister in King Dahir's Darbar..He wrote Chachnama. This Chachnama was the main reason for Dahir's defeat actually..

[@sandeepshelar5560]

Bhai history student hoon C mat bana logo ko

[@YashSharma-ig1hp]

just read all the book of vikram sampat

[@rishavdeo4164]

Yes bro

[@Hnky_edits]

They won't😂😂

[@satyamgupta6986]

He will never make a video on him😂😂

[@shivampatil23]

They will call him a godi media person 😂😂

[@Indus720]

Lol, He Promotes Pakistani liberal narrative and any rightwing Indian views is against Pakistan state as well as liberal narrative.

[@kanika0846]

This video is wrong at so many levels! Completely biased. Couldn't even watch it till the end. Leaving my dislike

[@arifsaleem5467]

😂😂😂

[@arifsaleem5467]

I sympathize with you, you definitely got a sensitive but-t. 😂

[@TruthPrevailz]

It's ok. Pakistanis are pretty uneducated about indian politics

[@upadhyayabr5131]

Hindus hv more than five thousand years history.More than Ninety nine percent of Muslims in India from Hindus.How Pakistanis trying their different origin?Can never be otherwise

[@rahulkhaleej]

Ex Muslim sahil ❤❤❤❤

[@dhruvverma2951]

🙌🏼

[@shahanarif4295]

Gobar bakht spotted 😂😂

[@satyamgupta6986]

👍

[@siddharthm4095]

Yes

[@arifsaleem5467]

Cowcola stench detected. 😂😂😂

[@JaipalNehra]

Most of the Indian muslims are converted from local Indian people.

[@nikhil1412]

Gore bhi kabhi kabhi accept kar lete hain ki unhone galat kia. Yeh kaunsi mentality hai bhai natives ko hi samjhao, ki tum native log galat kar rahe ho.

[@ProNoooob97]

It's a "Peaceful" Mentality..

[@amish2394]

uski videos dekho usne inn sab ko ghalat kaha hai, tum gobarkhor bas bhokte hai

[@Indus720]

@@amish2394 Yes, He is blaming Indian rightwing for brutality of Islamist conquest 🤣

[@RONY234-m3o]

Bhai gaan me dum hain toh j Sai Deepak ka book ka review kro

[@mohitpal6652]

problem is that more than 90% of the muslim of the sucontinents consider qasim, ghazni,ghori , mughals as their hero

[@Siddhi-94]

1947 मैं पाकिस्तान बनाया हैं अब तो भारत के नाम लेके चिल्लाना बंद करो... ओर आगे कैसे बढणा वो सोचो... भारत मैं पहले देश ओर बाद मैं धर्म हैं ओर पाकिस्तान मैं पहले मज हब (इस्लाम) फिर देश तो देश कैसे आगे बढेगा.. मैं भी हिंदु(सनातनी) हु पर हमे धर्म से पहले देश हैं ओर ऐसी सोचं मेरा धर्म शिखाता हैं गर्व हैं मुझे धर्म... भारत मैं 80% हिंदु (सनातन) हैं फिर भी हम धर्म आधार पर नहीं बल्की सर्व धर्म समभाव ऐसी सोच रखके सेक्लुलर देश की पहचान बनाई यही यही सोच हमारी... जय भारत 🇮🇳

[@siddharthm4095]

Haa sahi baat hai

[@shivampatil23]

So TRUE ❤

[@QabilAGhor]

Why is there is not a single Muslim in Modi's cabinet? Typically, in almost all democracies, governments always try to make their government inclusive. Even in Syria, where there is an interim government, there is a lot of pressure from Western government to include minorities and give them a seat at the table. Why is there no pressure on India. Pakistan also tries to have at least one or two Hindu or Christians in the federal and provincial cabinets.

[@vikkyghale912]

​@@QabilAGhor jab religion dekhar ministers banaye jaate hain to Pakistan jaise countries ki tarah growth hoti hai.. aur dusri baat tumko kya lagta hai modi ko sirf hindus hi vote karte han??? Ye soch ke nikalo baahar

[@QabilAGhor]

@@vikkyghale912 There has to be diversity and inclusivity at every level of government. It is not just voting. You have to prove to minorities that they are part of governance and they have a stake in the success of the government. I see vitriol against Indian Muslims almost every day on Indian social media. Obviously, Muslims have been sidelined, discriminated against, and made to feel as outsiders. What this means is that India is on a trajectory which would result in a holocaust.

[@sant.76]

Read Vikram Sampath. Bro these books are at very scratching level about India and Hindus.

[@TruthPrevailz]

He won't be able to read it.

[@amish2394]

except some rw fools nobody takes that idiot seriusly, he has been debunked numerous time

[@shirshendughosh5900]

Brother, in India generally Hindus never think Muslims as outsiders, rather Muslims themselves feel that they have originated somewhere in Arab or central Asia, and the reason is the Muslim ulemas who makes them feel like that..Unfortunately these has increased more now a days, as Muslims be it Bengalis, Biharis or Malayalees they will dress more like an Arab instead of their local customs and traditions…

[@kanika0846]

He thinks india is like pakistan

[@ravindramorey5433]

This is real strange. You are confusing national identity with religious identity. National identity is basis for nation state. Probably now pakistani whose forefathers demanded and got seperate state for Muslims have suddenly woken up and realized that we are indian originally so we should not be consider ghuspethia if we or bangladeshi illegally migrate to india? Strange logic

[@jumper030281]

I used to be a subscriber to TPE. But commenting on his videos makes shehzad think me a troll because I ask shehzad to do some original research, hear some voices from the Indian audience ( right wing perspective ) . The false equivalence that the Islamic right wing is equal to the Hindu right wing . That Muslims in India inspite of occupying some of the highest offices in the country, being the third largest owners of property in the country through the WAQF, having the freedom till now to operate some of their personal laws in accordance with Sharia... All this happens in a country that is majority hindu. Thank heavens for that because otherwise like Pakistan, Afghanistan , Bangladesh and even Iran where the mindset of the common people and the influencers is to pull themselves to the bottom of the sea rather than rise up to enlightenment and prosperity. You guys are more concerned about other communities rather than working on yourself and fixing what's wrong with you. The Hindu right wing is the resistance to an onslaught that has been constant , overt and covert over centuries. We can convert to your religion but to what end ? Not one country or community exists on earth where you guys are in majority , practice your religion to the T and are happy. So what ideals are you talking about ?? But simultaneously almost all countries where Muslims migrate to seem to develop islamophobia. And people like shezad then bury their heads in the sand.

[@kumar2748]

They won't understand...

[@seventhquarter]

It's never about reading volume of books all the time.. There lies a very subtle difference between how one grew up on anything reading books that might have captured one's own subconcious mind, and the the reality behind.🙂

[@LACHIT-w9t]

The All-India Muslim League was founded on December 30, 1906 in Dhaka, British India (now Dhaka, Bangladesh) by several leaders, including: but in contrast RSS founded in 1925 only.

[@JaysaiDeepak]

Jinnah, who organized Direct Action Day, was a man of nationalism. When all Muslims stood together for one country, was it communal for a Hindu to stand up for his Hindu community?

[@RohitKaul-TheRealOne]

My dear Shehzad, rather than relying on Indian woke historians, I would request you to read the writings of Savarkar, Ambedkar I e the source and not rely on tertiary sources. In addition, I would recommend reading books by Vikram Sampath, Jai Sai Deepak, Sanjeev Sanyal, Manu Pillai and I would love to hear your critique and rebuttal

[@sarthakjain3493]

Islamic conquest of india is bloodiest episode of history

[@TruthPrevailz]

For pakistanis its jihad😂😂😂😂

[@SSwathi-ge5wj]

As a lover of History (especially Bhartiya) I can 100℅ conform that you are right😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@SSwathi-ge5wj]

'Shambhaji Maharaj again refused to accept Islam. His tongue was t*rn out and the question was again put. Shambhaji Maharaj had called for writing materials. In it he wrote:- "I will not accept Islam even if the Emperor (Aurangzeb) bri*es me with his daughter." After that he (Chattrapati Maharaj) was put to death by tor*ure.'

[@gibreelfarishta8037]

Consider ‘The New India’ by Rahul Bhatia

[@shekharsandhwar2977]

You are a good speaker, friend. A suggestion is not to draw parallel. You have limited and convenient research on Hinduism but the pretension is as if you know everything . I understand demonising and paralleling islam and Hinduism must be giving you creative solace, and it also mitigates the guilt of islam. Have some primary research of Hinduism before passing the narrative... But I don't blame you, being pakistani carries some limitations and propoganda both. Let the good sense prevail on you...

[@rgyalchanhussain9966]

16:40 Shows how inaccurate and intellectual dishonest Chach Nama is . At that time Baghdad was neither the provincial capital of the Governorate under Hajjaj's control, Iraq ( that was Basra) or Empire's capital ( Damascus ).

[@VenkataPradeep24]

The only way this region could progress is to destroy the veil behind which the exploiter is hiding. Kudos bhai, you're one of the leading light in that direction.

[@mystery1967]

Chhupte nhi chhupta bayan e dard dil ka😂😂😂😂 religious hate bahar aa gae bhai ki Hindutva ? What is hindutva

[@robinchaulagain206]

The way you bringing things into action looks so intelligent intellectual ,so constructive so hopefully and so good and maturity in talking . So much sensitivity in talk.

[@ThePakistanExperience]

🙌

[@jailbreaker-wz]

Bro what happened in New Orleans :-(

[@Zainn_Aly]

Everyone condemns such incidents ! all human life matter

[@UUuu-n4m]

​@@Zainn_Aly not according to islam

[@parullgossain]

Every time Shehzad is running low on funds, he makes a video around India and indians fund him generously. Smart boy Shehzad.

[@ThePakistanExperience]

Read the comments then make this argument - paisa kamana hota toh godhi media type videos banata

[@ProNoooob97]

​@@ThePakistanExperiencepr jo bna rhe ho vo bhi koi critical ya rational content nhi hai😂😂

[@parullgossain]

@@ThePakistanExperience because I have seen the comments I know that the majority views are Indians. My comment earlier was just an observation about the insane Indian participation.

[@omerashraf9357]

You should make a video on the first Kashmir war

[@shubhammittal9003]

Bro hindutva is just a Sanskrit word for Hinduism..like mamta in Sanskrit is matratv ,bhaichara in Sanskrit is bhratva ..so hindutva is just hindu ess or the philosophy of Hinduism.. Jab hindu koi lafz hi ni to hindutv kaha se aa gaya ....please let me know about it..

[@ammarmubashir6568]

Brother don’t mind galti bhee hoskti hai. Aj kal jis sense main use hota hai banda ussi se relate krrha hota hai. Like aj kal log jihad ko sirf killing ya suicide se relate krrhay hotay hain islye shayad galti hogaye ho

[@Hnky_edits]

​@@ammarmubashir6568jihad ka matlab mujhe bhi pata hai aur usse aaj jaise use karte hai voh bhi pata hai..... Vahi agar mai puchu ki hindutva se kya problem hua hai...bomb blast? Murders? Bas sanatani ko serve karne ki baat hoti hai😂 people are not liking it only bcoz they talk about the rights of sanatanis apart from other minorities

[@Akhsunadhruv]

​@@ammarmubashir6568pr bhai tum mano ya na mano muslim invader hi the jinhone hindu rajao ko haraya or rule kiya or aaj jitne bhi mulsim h india or pakistan maximum converted hai jo ki pehle hindu the

[@amish2394]

keep yapping, hindutva means culture nationalism, and its ideas are not even indian, they were borrowed from europe, read guru golvalkar, his ideas are exact opposite of the nonsense definiton u have given

[@shubhammittal9003]

@amish2394 who told you guru govalkar has the authority anything to say about hindutva?? It means what laden did on 9/11 in the name of lslam ..will u say he was teaching the lesson of islam??

[@abhidelight]

I have read editorials of Dawn news daily for 6 _7 years. I read books. Saw hundreds of podcast of all types. As Shahzad brother said, my final conclusion is exactly the same. Thanks.... big thanks Jinnah. I am from India 🇮🇳

[@beyondinfinity3658]

Left & right both wings in Pakistan are still confused about their origins with the history of Islam.

[@Carryminatiroastvx3dw]

After Sindh conquer Arab going to Punjab where Lalitadiya defeated him and after they'll go to Rajasthan and Gujarat where Nagbhatta alliance defeted him ki||ed Al-Junyad...835 Mihirbhoja led Kanuaj Force defeated Ummayad in Kutch and re-capture Sindh cities. Bro Indian are struggling against Arab from Centuries. Why are u not mention it..

[@Yalla12347]

Beta start kahan sai hua tha? The only recorded history on this matter is Chachnama and Futuhul Buldan by Balaazari. It clearly states that ships were sacked by pirates which were going from Sri Lanka to Arabia. The pirates took the money and women and then took refuge in Sindh under Raja Dahir. Raja Dahir despite being the ruler of the region refused to provide any support to the arabians and simply stated “we cant do anything about it”. Yeh kahan sai start hota hai woh bhul kyun jatay ho.

[@Carryminatiroastvx3dw]

@@Yalla12347 are mere bhai..Yashovarman was a descendant of the great king Harshavardhan, Chalukyas, allies of Nagabhata, descendants of Pulakeshin II. Both were known for their intellectual pursuits and great leadership. They earned wide recognition for their well-governed kingdoms and prosperity. Chinese traveller Hiuen Tsang was highly impressed by the administration of both and the welfare of their kingdoms. isme se Kisi ke pass bhi Arabiyo aurto ke liye time nhi hoga..aj agar TTp ne Saudia kuch kr diya to Arab Pak ko invaid kr dege..Converted hone bad dimag or history dono karab ho jati hai.

[@Hashu-d3h]

People don't know the Hindutva and what is this it's become complicated for any person who follows any Abrahamic faith here are other points is the Hindu religion or buddhism Sikhism and Jainism is different in many aspects to Abrahimic religion and the hindutva is not suddenly originated in india the 1st Book which has this name is Anandmatth which is book came in 1800 how under Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah's reign were against the Hindus and how horrific atrocities happend written by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay or Chatterjee And the Vinayak Damodar Savarkar expanded it and explain this also refine it The hindutva movement is the movement which is want to unify the Hindus and fought against Cast hierarchy and end any kind of thing which lead to discriminate on any level even though The savarkar opinion was as hundred and hundred of years As kushan ,Hunds and may tribal came and we accepted eachother faith and mix it under one umbrella if muslim do same and we both accept eachother gods or prophets and mix in under one religion this can end the Hindu muslim rivalry yah Hindutva is kind a different then the hard liner islam hindutva ia different it's not against any religion its for the saving our

[@kanika0846]

@@Hashu-d3h thanks for saying this bro! 🫶

[@Hashu-d3h]

@kanika0846 thanks for reading this long para 😅

[@kanika0846]

@@Hashu-d3h it's fine! Not that big, someone else has also typed out an even bigger para, hugee. Good that we can give a strong reply to these people. ✨

[@deepanshu41515]

Bapp rawal ka baray mai bhi video banao jisne bin qasim ko iran thak bhaga dia tha

[@DineshSingh-rt4nz]

Muslims are outsiders they are very different

[@vvk594]

Does your historians ever speak of Hindus kings - Ashoka, Sri Krishna Deva Raya, Cholas, Satavahanas, Kakatiyas, Kalingas, the great Marathas, Northern India Rulers Maurya Dynasty, Rajasthan Rulers, Gujarat Kingdoms etc. Your history is totally silent on The Hindu kingdoms with great temples and architecture

[@niharsena3829]

1st mosque in india is in kerela ie established in 629 ce where as mohammed bin quasim battle in sindh in 708ce

[@mverma5619]

Sadly have seen this channel shrinking in the past months; the same topics ad infinitum.. If it wasnt for Indians commenting , it would be dead. There is only so much religion and politics that one can listen to. Please have better and less divisive topics

[@ThePakistanExperience]

I don’t think I’ve ever discussed Mohammad bin Qasim before this week

[@anikroars]

I think the real narrative of Hindutva is understood in a narrow way. Hindutva yehi kehta hain the moment they are converted to something which makes you think you are not related to your roots then..

[@DrWasim]

Pakistan 🇵🇰 zindabad❤ I’m so glad we got our own country. I would never want to live in the far right India of today.

[@Carryminatiroastvx3dw]

What are Lalitadiya Muktipida, Yashovarman, Nagabhatta, Dantidurga, Mihirbhoj doing.. Arab are not come Play chess & Ludo with him 😢

[@politics4270]

Kindly tell about zajiya

[@Yalla12347]

The fact that you cant even pronounce or even write the word, shows your ignorance about it. News flash bro, you people are still paying it, but now not 2.5%, its 30%.

[@pranjul.k.aryagupta]

​@@Yalla12347 Nah! The tax we're paying is not for our protection to practice our rights as Hindus... Neither it's according to any shariat or islamic law. Infact it's according to the Constitution of India

[@Yalla12347]

@@pranjul.k.aryagupta so you are telling me if you dont pay your taxes and openly walk around and avail public amenities, and just go to your mandirs and masjids, you will not be put in jail? This is what propaganda does to your brain. The problem you have is simply that it is categorised for “non muslims” who are called protected minorities or “Dhimma”. What you fail to realise it that muslims have their own taxes “Ushur” and “Zakat”. Please also note Jizya is only for the able bodied MAN who earns. A woman despite earning will not pay it. A old man who does not work will not. Children will not. A man who cant earn will not. In exchange you live life as normal, avail all public amenities and go to your temples as you were doing. You have been so brainwashed because anything associated to the word “Shariah” just has to be hated or considered evil. Get out of the rock Sharma jee. Its 2025.

[@Yalla12347]

@@pranjul.k.aryagupta please tell me if there are any repercussions for not paying taxes and living life as usual in India. Your only problem is that it is associated with Shariah, apart from that there is practically no difference. What you fail to understand is that muslims have their own taxes which they oay “Ushur” and “Zakat”. Time to leave the propoganda.

[@Yalla12347]

@@pranjul.k.aryagupta the tax is not solely for a specific religion but in-fact for all other than muslims. If you had cared to check muslims have their own tax “Zakat” and “Usher”. Also the tax only applies to able bodied men who are earning. No on women (even if they earn), children or old people. Just because it is part of a system associated to a religion, you want to hate it. Furthermore it is not compulsory. If a state decides not to impose the tax then that is well within its scope. Also please educate me if there are no repercussions for not paying taxes in India and you can just avail all public amenities and spend life as usual. The hypocrisy is unreal.

[@gytsixp]

Gen Hamid Gul the celebrated ISI DG said prophetic words in 2014 - Modi is the best thing that happened to Pakistan since 1947 Partition . How TRUE

[@riteshkaushik]

I love this guy, as he discusses ideas and thoughts - which is most intelligent & wise. ❤

[@ThePakistanExperience]

❤️

[@indigenous_clips]

Dahir was brutal..Bcz of Chach..That's why Jats and Baloch(although they are ethnically jats) of Sindh helped Kasim to defeat Dahir because Dahir persecuted Jats on advice of Chach

[@QabilAGhor]

There was also a religious angle to it. Dahir was Hindu and he had suppressed Buddhists who were in the majority. Buddhists also sided with Qasim and saw him as their liberator. I have put forward a theory that it were mostly Buddhists in the Subcontinent who eventually converted to Islam. The vast Hindu majority did not. The evidence of that is that Buddhism has virtually disappeared at least in Muslim majority areas of the Subcontinent, and these were the areas where Buddhists were the majority before the arrival of Islam.

[@indigenous_clips]

@QabilAGhor Jats were too Buddhists ..Pakhttons were too

[@QabilAGhor]

@@indigenous_clips Funny you said that about Pashtuns. Last few days have been having many discussions with Afghans who somehow think that they are ethnically superior to Indians and Pakistanis---even superior to Pakistani Pashtuns.

[@QabilAGhor]

@@indigenous_clips My point was that besides caste, Dahir was also probably prejudiced against Buddhists because of their religion.

[@QabilAGhor]

@@indigenous_clips I know you are Indian, but except for in Punjab, where there is a bradari system, Pakistanis don't really care much about caste any more. There have been so many mixed marriages that it is impossible to put people in a particular caste. When Pakistani leaders are selected. I generally find out about their caste from Indian media. 😄

[@DesiChilean]

13:12 Muslim iNvaders to kiye the sare zurm .. galat wo nahi the is baat me ... galat ye tha ki angrez bachane nahi aaye the .

[@LACHIT-w9t]

What came Ist ? Demand of separate land for muslims or Hindutva. Pls check history. Demand for muslim nation came first. The Hindutava came as reactionary force. Gazawahind came so Akhanda Bharat idea came.

[@RiazPalijo-g2e]

Pakistan k history textbooks mein Bin Qasim hero hai lekin uss k bawujud Pakistan mein Sindhi Muslims Raja Dahir ko hi hero maantay hain. Pata nhin kion sirf Sindh k log hi Bin Qasim ko lutera, qatil hamla aawar maantay hain. Iski kia waja ho sakti hai?

[@sonachenab]

Very informative. Thanks.

[@ThePakistanExperience]

🙌

[@NawabRoadStars]

Superb representation bro! We all are INDIANS, irrespective of our borders and respective religions!

[@ThePakistanExperience]

🙌

[@berzerius]

Great book review. It illustrates important points about Pakistani State's manufactured history and of the simplistic views of some RSS fans. But, it's not very helpful in saying much about the overall picture of the Muslim conquest and rule in India. There is often repeated narrative that muslim rule wasn't that bad because they married hindu women, and they had some hindus in important posts. What is missed is that for most of this period, the local religions were subjugated and humiliated systematically. Some even enslaved people who could not pay jaziya. It was either live as a slave or convert and join the opressors. The overrepresentation of turkic, persian and other foreign people at top positions as a state policy was actually what started the division Even before the British came in. By converting to Islam, and changing your culture to a "superior" foreign culture, and by shunning local identity, a person could gain the favour of the ruling elites and climb the social ladder. Wherever this attitude was prevalent, we see greater cultural polarization among muslims and non muslims.

[@jailbreaker-wz]

Can review on tipu sultan book of vikram sampath

[@deepanshu41515]

Humne toh hamesha hi koshish ki dosti ki pakistan sa. Apna dost samjha. Par harr barr unhone dhoka dia. Abb toh pay back time. H. Modi ji is just a consequence of pakistans actions

[@AbhaySingh-qb1td]

Thankyou jinna 😝

[@kanwarpreetbaweja1698]

Awesome talk … loving this new generation of Pakistani thinkers making the effort to unlearn indoctrination & trying to figure things out for themselves 👍👍 Best Wishes

[@ThePakistanExperience]

❤️

[@Nmpdestruction]

Shehzad you should advocate for the sharia. It’s the only thing that can fix Pakistan and you know it

[@SSwathi-ge5wj]

I am not a Hindutwawadi. I am a rational thinker. But I disagree with some of the points in your video.

[@ThePakistanExperience]

Disagreement is welcome

[@HumanityFirst-z8c]

You are a short sited person trying to equate arbi muslim & Hindu ideology

[@akbob6466]

If you track your lineage to Arabs, Turks and Mongols then you have answered your question yourself.

[@AmrinderSinghHundal]

I reached home and got Chachnama with me. The myth of Muslim invader theory or Muhammad bin Qasim the first Pakistani theory is busted in Chachnama itself. Though it is mostly hagiographic account of the Sindh Invasion, but irony can be pulled out from its comfort and shown to all by reciting it only. According to Chachnama, when Rai Chach took control of the fort of Sikkah, before proceeding towards Multan,he appointed a Muslim noble, named Amir Ainaldullah Rehan Madni, to be temporarily in charge of affairs of Sikkah. Hence proving that Muslims were very much part of the societal fabric of Sindh(Hind) before Qasim even arrived.

[@ThePakistanExperience]

Yes 🙌

[@TruthPrevailz]

Are to ye invaders ko glorify kaun karta hai ???😂😂😂😂 only pakistanis. Ye shehzad no pakistan ki history text book author Karni chaie. Lol

[@ramchauhan8819]

What is India Today is because of Pakistan and the uncompromising attitude of Indian Muslims. From Nehru till Manmohan Singh Congress fought for secular values. Pakistan continued to bleed India some way or other and simultaneously Indian Muslims were supported all the while to grow. However they took it otherwise and started engaging in anti national activities like SIMI (Student Islamic Movement of India) and Indian Muzahiddin and indulged in terror activities which fanned anti muslim sentiments l. Another aspect which resulted in rise of Hindu activism and BJP is uncompromising attitude towards three main pious hindu places of worship on which mosques were believed was constructed were Ram Janm Bhoomi, Kirishan Janm Bhoomi and Varansi kashi Shiv temple which they couldnhave volunteered to Hindus. They were unsupportive and uncompromising. Result frustration among Hindus and rise of anti muslim sentiments. Believe me still majority of Hindus are very liberal we visit all famous majars in India in Delhi and Ajmer and others as well. I can write essays on it. Why today's indian society is so much divided. Anyway thanks

[@hagemurutv2277]

Pajeet you brainwashed RSS is real danger

[@saadahmad438]

Never have I been this early to a video

[@ThePakistanExperience]

❤️

[@ThePakistanExperience]

I am early to replying to you too 😂

[@trilokyamohanchakra6351]

Ab berojgaar aadmi karega bhi kya😂

[@shatnermohanty6678]

Arey , program shuru ho gya I'm late to the party 😁

[@ShyamKumar-zb2mw]

Are you saying that Muslim invaders did not ever desecrate temples and build mosques over them? If that is the level of denialism that you profess - isn't that too a revisionist history?

[@arifsaleem5467]

Hindus desecrated Buddhist temples or converted them into hindu temples. What about that?

[@hagemurutv2277]

Pajeet you brainwashed RSS is danger