I have always been amazed at the quality of researchers in LUMS. Such detached intellectual analysis of our past is absolutely necessary. When we study someone else's ideas, we do not immediately have to either support them or criticize them. Thank you, Dr. Rahman, for this analysis.
@omarsiddiqui77964 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/epKwn6OIabV4n7s
@SAVETHEHUMANRACE19524 жыл бұрын
We are not capable to understand the invisible matters of Almighty Allah I don't know who shaped the man Sir Syed Ahmed Khan
@SherSingh-mk9th3 жыл бұрын
WOW! Sir Sayed Ahmed Khan was an enlightened and logical being of his time. He was far ahead of his time. He seems a very logical person.
@niharikasinghsays4 жыл бұрын
Hello sir I am from India, I am an atheist, this is such a beautiful insightful lecture. Thank you so much.
@jamalhussainarman22495 жыл бұрын
Today, I understand why Britain give Syed Ahmad Khan the title of "SIR".
@alisyed29134 жыл бұрын
Spot on
@Thatbeautifulgirl54 жыл бұрын
And same title was granted to Iqbal as well😉
@challengeworld85594 жыл бұрын
You have yet to get to the point.
@SAVETHEHUMANRACE19524 жыл бұрын
@@Thatbeautifulgirl5 guide why they were give the title of sir
@AbdulBari-to5mm3 жыл бұрын
@@Thatbeautifulgirl5 اے نبی! اپنی بیویوں سے اور اپنی صاحبزادیوں سے اور مسلمانوں کی عورتیں سے کہہ دو کہ وه اپنے اوپر اپنی چادریں لٹکا لیا کریں،اور اللہ تعالیٰ بخشنے واﻻ مہربان ہے سوره احزاب آیات 59
@imtiaz47876 жыл бұрын
It's really enlightening, Taimur sir. Your videos have huge impact and it has certainly altered the way I used to perceive things. Great job, sir. God bless you and I am hopeful that someday your videos will be guiding the many.
@khalidrasool72336 жыл бұрын
Imtiaz Zahoor (
@usamaakbar63493 жыл бұрын
The only person whom i can listen 24/7 . Mashallah
@tabinda29226 жыл бұрын
Sir make a video on Abul kalam azad and his predictions
@bacusiitk5 жыл бұрын
Kalam was the only visionary person of that time....
@SAVETHEHUMANRACE19524 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/door/Fo1kNcMHvWp1x46b4xXFHQ
@AbdulBari-to5mm3 жыл бұрын
اے نبی! اپنی بیویوں سے اور اپنی صاحبزادیوں سے اور مسلمانوں کی عورتیں سے کہہ دو کہ وه اپنے اوپر اپنی چادریں لٹکا لیا کریں،اور اللہ تعالیٰ بخشنے واﻻ مہربان ہے سوره احزاب آیات 59
@gentleman72704 ай бұрын
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan Was Preparing Muslims for Agnosticism
@Taimur_Laal4 ай бұрын
@@gentleman7270 I think he was just trying to reconcile science and Islam.
@naziabaloch27436 жыл бұрын
You are not vlongging the video but teaching the thousands of students about fact ... Thanks Sir Taimur for these Informative videos❤
@mrsporty96693 жыл бұрын
Lot of new things from M.A.Jinnah and Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. It's amazing. I don't know what to believe ! !
@jamilppo9 ай бұрын
Very nice lecture ever delivered in Pakistan.
@alifarhan18385 жыл бұрын
Sir you have solved one of my biggest questions, I have been swinging between leftist and rightist ideologies but now I am clear
@AbdulBari-to5mm3 жыл бұрын
Brother kia tha ?
@dsantosh78825 жыл бұрын
Apki video dekhkar. Aisa Lag raha ki ab Muslims modern aur reform ho rahe. Hai yah ak achi Suruwat hai . I salute to you sir for good informational lecture.
@ramanbeniwal283 жыл бұрын
Ideology of Sir Syed Ahmed khan was very progressive and no doubt why he became so famous. Thankyou so much for sharing his thoughts.
@sattarahammed5894 жыл бұрын
Secularism is solely a Islamic concept even at the time of prophet (pbuh). Jinnah followed that kind of secularism, neither theocracy imposed by mullah nor extreme secularist views like Mustafa Kamal and other Western religious phobe leaders.
I think when Quran says "Who believe in the unseen will be successful in Akhirah". So why people relate it to science. Science deals with matter only not with the unseen things. Islam never rejects science and science never discussed religion. So these are different terms people can go on with both with no issues.
@fadingtraditionsandculture42784 жыл бұрын
Sir Sayyad Ahmad khan, the great, I salute you
@AbdulBari-to5mm3 жыл бұрын
Unho ny deen ko buhat noqsan ponchaya
@ghazalgeetguru53232 жыл бұрын
Umda explain kia hy prof sb
@asmatmohmand15814 жыл бұрын
I am pre.medical student. I didn't know anything about Pakistan Studies but now I am taking interest in Pakistan Studies😒😞💔💔
@itachisensei33066 жыл бұрын
sayed ahmed khan and jinnah were highly secular and progressive..Md. Ali Jinnah was considered as the ambassador of Hindu Muslim unity in the 1920s.. But what made him change his mind is still a mystery.And not only Islam extremists but also Hindu extremists believe that darwin's theory is false . by the way, i am from Orissa and i really like your interpretations.
@AlaHazratAhmadRazaKhan Жыл бұрын
The great sir syed ahmed khan
@quamrulhassan82055 жыл бұрын
Unbelievable. He was a man of modern age. Salute from Bangladesh.
@javedzehri38672 жыл бұрын
Excellent, marvellous
@tyson66956 жыл бұрын
it makes so much sense.sir u just cleared all the misconceptions and reservations i had about jinnah,and muslim league.thank u soooo much
@muqaddasfatimah67463 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for such enlightened information. Stay blessed Sir 🙏❤️
@imangujjar53675 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much to help us in solving this confusion.
@bennchmarks4 жыл бұрын
“And (remember) when your Lord said to the angels: ‘I am going to create a human (Adam) from sounding clay of altered black smooth mud. So when I have fashioned him and breathed into him (his) soul created by Me, then you fall down prostrate to him.” (Quran 38:71-72)
@nishan63925 жыл бұрын
While I admit this is an amazing interpretation of islam, I do see a few issues. 1)Thinking there is no difference between science and quran, and curtailing a philosophy in that way does not solve certain issues. Also, questionng Hadith and praising quran based on the idea that Hadihs were written later, makes the time, quran was written, auspicious and a fixed point in time. Which is a dangerous idea and that essentially imploded 2)The contradictions Jinnah had can mean another thing, as an enlightened "british" he wanted to rule a place, which again is a problem. Personally I think Gandhi, Nehru and Jinnah had tons of issues and at the end Punjabis and Bengalis mainly had to bear the burden. We Bengalis are still bearing the burden in a fascist regime in the form of NRC! I would like to hear from you about a few other things 1)How to interpret stalin 2) A note on partition 3) A note on Gandhi and Nehru 4)Why Pakistan became an islamist state and India is becoming a fascist nation 4) Is there any way we can achieve peace in the subcontinent, like say EU 5) What do you think about "On the eastern question" and Lenin's comment on Pan-islamism? I love your videos and I seriously wish I had a chance to sit in your class, and that is one of the reason, I would be hating partition :-\ If only India and Pakistan had free passage and I could sit in your class without having to worry about a visa!
@kamranmahfooz125 жыл бұрын
Quran is central to us dude. I see no contradiction in Quran and modern world. From India
@nishan63925 жыл бұрын
@@kamranmahfooz12 good for you.
@HaiderAli-co9jl5 жыл бұрын
@@kamranmahfooz12 There are many contradictions as Islam is an old pagan religion
@artandsoul8603 жыл бұрын
Long year before I was searching this history very well... Thanks a lot from India
@AliRaza-yf2eh3 жыл бұрын
I am student of physics . I like you because your work is very helpful to abolish superstitions set in our surrounding densily Carry on God bless you
@kumailbadami83283 жыл бұрын
Thank you very for making an intellectual video with reference. But at 21:55, the claim is made that Quaid-e-Azam's interpretation of Islam is based on the Islamic interpretation of Syed Ahmed Khan, but no reference was provided. Similarly, at 23:19, Quaid's response was negative to scholars who were following TAQLEEDI approach towards religion. If possible, please provide above mentioned references as it is the main part and climax of both the videos.
@crickettales6764 жыл бұрын
Sir I m your top fan, but I'm really sorry that u couldn't manage to justice with the conflict ... Nonetheless, it was much informative.... U must have read that Jinnah was much impressed by iqbal's n azad's version of Islam. Moreover, Iqbal's view of Islam was totally opposite to sir syed's one.
@jamilkhan7154 жыл бұрын
Well done. Continue with the topic so that you could educate the people!!! Take care!!
@drmohdashrafmatt51396 жыл бұрын
Gamdhi sahab has written a lot against perwez and sir Syed rahimhullah - Taimur must hear javid Gamdhi or read his book Meezan
@zubaidagillani53595 жыл бұрын
Sahe bol rhy Ho...
@globexhelp99114 жыл бұрын
Ghamdi sab is a good scholar but its not neccessarily right everytime.
@thehumorousfilms35254 жыл бұрын
Why are you praising syed ahmed by giving him the title of rehmatullah ?
@AbdulBari-to5mm3 жыл бұрын
@@thehumorousfilms3525 kia sach ma Gamdi sab ny rahamtula Likha ha ?
@virendrasharms11635 жыл бұрын
I, studied at Aligarh Muslim University. Hindu, used to study in complete safety. In, many courses like m.b.b.s.and engineering non Muslim students out numbered Muslims. It, was a good place to study.
@Khan_et_al6 жыл бұрын
Traditional Scholars issued 69 fatwas against Sir Syed.
@naturedude486 жыл бұрын
And?
@suzuya_965 жыл бұрын
69 seems a nice number
@crickettales6764 жыл бұрын
@@suzuya_96 😂😂😂
@SAVETHEHUMANRACE19524 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKXHinaon9eFqNE
@SAVETHEHUMANRACE19524 жыл бұрын
Well
@bashirahmadkhan29755 жыл бұрын
Sir Syed Ahmad khan not only reject the Ahadees but also contradicted the Quran in his writings.... Because the existence of Jinnat, Hazrat Ibrahim a.s thrown in fire, Hazrat Musa's a.s miracle of stick , Hazrat Isa a.s birth without Father all are described in the Holy Quran.
@AllamaMashriqi6 жыл бұрын
Majority of Muslims Opposed the Partition of India The majority of Muslims opposed the division of India, which is evident from the fact that most Muslims ultimately did not migrate to Pakistan and stayed back in their homeland (India). Muslim leaders who opposed the partition of India continue to be ignored or misrepresented, which confirms that a false history is being taught.
@shehzadshah41042 жыл бұрын
Occam's razor Dr.Rahman; the cleaner explanation is that the contradiction lies within Sir Syed's thought as well, & the simple reason is that his priority was Muslim loyalty to the British within a separation from Hindus, not a consistent political philosophy.
@madihasohail49904 жыл бұрын
THANK you sir you have cleared my ambiguities
@nadeemriaz253918 күн бұрын
Well presented Taimur sahb. Do you have any pdf copy of Tafsir ul Quran by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan?
@Taimur_Laal17 күн бұрын
Thank you. Sorry. I don't.
@salmanpsd2626 жыл бұрын
If sir syed is in this era most of his research has gone to a point where quran and science met
@chanderkumr83666 жыл бұрын
Great lecture....👌👌
@fatimarana78806 жыл бұрын
You very clearly said in part-1 of your video that when Jinnah referred to Islam as a system for Pakistani state, he was influenced by Sir Syed and it would clarify the apparent contradiction in Jinnah's speeches. You did not touch upon. let alone prove, as to how Jinnah's Islamic content was informed by Sir Syed. Did Sir Syed ever talked about Sharia as basis of the constitution ? Or Sir Syed wanted a state based on Islamic Principles ? Where is the link between Sir Syed and Jinnah's speeches ? It means Jinnah talked about Islam based on his own understanding developed over the years.
@47humza6 жыл бұрын
Great source of knowledge
@santoshmaurya48316 жыл бұрын
Good Lecture.
@khialking5 жыл бұрын
100 %good analysis Agree with you sir
@QIKZBB6 жыл бұрын
Golden lecture sir!
@asfarazeem Жыл бұрын
Sir with huge respect your information about Ghamidi sb is incomplete.
@MitrasenS5 жыл бұрын
Sir, I wish to meet you. Please let me know where is it possible? Outside India/ Pakistan off course.
@rajahamza48554 жыл бұрын
Lahore nust university
@talhagaming72043 жыл бұрын
qatal krna hai hamary teacher ko
@KAMALHOSSAIN-lz5hx4 жыл бұрын
Iam student of aligarh muslim university he was great educationist
@dexter-wg3je4 жыл бұрын
Jab hum Aristotle or Socrates ki sayings per believe kr lety hn per Hadith per per believe kerny ma kia masla ha ???
@AhmadKhokharr5 жыл бұрын
Sir can you please give us the referencenes in the form of links or please specify the names of books or other material in which all these things are written.
@zubaidagillani53595 жыл бұрын
Bahe ghulam ahmad pervaiz k lectures youtube per mojood hen sun lo
@AllamaMashriqi6 жыл бұрын
In Pakistan, the foundation for fundamentalism, extremism, and hate towards non-Muslims was laid by the All-India Muslim League. If you are unsure on this point, read the types of slogans that the Muslim League used and what their leaders and supporters stated to gain support for the partition of India (and creation of Pakistan). Pakistanis still shy away from accepting the truth. -Nasim Yousaf, November 07, 2018
@kumailbadami83283 жыл бұрын
I would to comment on symbolic representation of Quran the idea given by Syed Ahmed Khan. Sir, you have mentioned at 6:17 that Syed Ahmed Khan started looking at Holy Quran from new perspective, that is symbolic representation of Holy Text. I found this point interesting so thought I should share it with you and learn from your feedback/ suggestion/ comment. The idea of viewing Holy Text as symbols particularly prepositions or descriptions is first started with Charch who were Kristian Philosophers who were unable to philosophically prove the existence of God so during the Reynaisaaance period. So, they realised that philosophical ideas adopted from Greeeek Philosophy is not going to help them prove philosophical or logical basis of their religion so they finally came up with symbolic representation of Holy Text. It helped Charch during Reynaisaaance period to convince that religion is still relevant. Syed Ahmed Khan got this idea from them and used similar interpretation of Islam. So, it was not a new approach. It was done previously couple of centuries ago by Kristian Preeest Philosophers. However, it doesn't mean there is no symbolic text in Holy Quran. It is there to but exceptional (which is also supported by intellect) not general. Quran is a book of Haq (reality), not symbolism. So, it was natural for scholars at that time and at this time, to show their response because it was coming from Kristian school of thoughts, may be modern interpretation of Holy Bybal. This is how I understand. Wanted to share background of symbolic representation of Holy Text.
@northman76364 жыл бұрын
I LOVE YOU 😍 SIR. SYED AHMAD KHAN ♥
@AbdulBari-to5mm3 жыл бұрын
Wo deen ko noqsan ponchany waly thy
@kamranmahfooz125 жыл бұрын
It was not Syed Ahmad khan's fault. He had just overestimated science which was getting popular at that time. He still is a great man.
@hep20224 жыл бұрын
Sir koi books bata dein Sir Syed ki jaha ye sare points detail me milein
@hinajunejohinajunejo284 жыл бұрын
Kia app sir sayed ki books k name beta sekty hain..I wanna to read please,,,
@gulsherahmed64575 жыл бұрын
Sir aap se be inteha moddebana darkhawast hai ki gulam ahmed parvez or unki thought pr bhi ek video zaroor banayye
@aadilyousufkashmiri32526 жыл бұрын
Please make videos on Bartand Russell , please make
@ejazahmedrizvi17144 жыл бұрын
قرآن اور حدیث برابر کی حیثیت نہیں ہے، قرآن واضع طور پر حدیث سے افضل ہے
@Taimur_Laal4 жыл бұрын
Ejaz Ahmed Rizvi I agree.
@stephenhawking91555 жыл бұрын
Wow I am amazed k ajkal k zamanay mein 1 reformer ka rehna itna mushkil hai magar Sir nay us zamanay mein Islam ko reform kia or Quran ki taseer likhi. Matlab agar hum sab log ikhatay ab bhi hojayen to Mullon ka khatma kar saktay hain jaisay us time pay Sir nay kia
@unmeshpatel48085 жыл бұрын
Salute to you, Taimurbhai.
@khadija48015 жыл бұрын
Sir Syed actually promoted the esoteric interpretation of Islam which exists since the time of Prophet Muhammad and a small sect in Islam have been practicing it since the last 1400 years .
@mohsinafzaal75505 жыл бұрын
Excellent.......love it!
@muzammilnisar95844 жыл бұрын
Aur ziada confuse karny ka shukria🙏.
@remedify36334 жыл бұрын
🌹🌹 Brilliant analysis 👍🏼🌹
@n6962n6 жыл бұрын
sir me phr bhi puchna chahta hu ap kia smajte hein sir syed ahmed khan ke barey me.
@aliasgharjaffri39164 жыл бұрын
Hi Sir, i really like your way of teaching, you are a great inspiration. Which book should i read to study Sir Syed comprehensively ?
@beats1274 жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much !
@chupapi58583 жыл бұрын
What is the source that sir Syed ahmed khan said all this?
@wasimahmed55822 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir for enlightened me..
@alirazasyed27636 күн бұрын
Yar Taimoor we are still afraid of to advocate sir Syed.
@awaamkiawaaz40675 жыл бұрын
Kindly boks ka Nam btaien jaha y sab likha Howa hai or page mention Kar dain pls plz
@iqraiqra58274 жыл бұрын
sir i have a question. secularism ki had tak to baat theek he samjh me b aati he lekin farishton ka mojud na hona ya vahi ka nazool na hona aur baqi b jin cheezon ko tamseeli bina pr kaha gya he us k barey me aapki kya raye he. aesa b to ho sakta he vo baten metaphoric na hon aur jin cheezon ko science proove nhi krti ham usey mojza samjh lety hen lekin jesy hi vo cheez aqal ki grift me aati he ham usey maan lety hen phir vo mojza nhi rehti. to ye b to ho sakta he k science hi us level tak na pohnchi ho jo un cheezon ko explain kr saky. jesy waqat k sath kafi cheezen proove hui. like waqa e miraaj mumkin he physics isko kisi had tak manti he ab. to aap apni raye den is pr plz. please i want to listen your answer. please answer my question.
@n6962n6 жыл бұрын
sir har bar kr trah great
@wasikhan74235 жыл бұрын
Salam Sir Sir Plato education system ka bar ma aik lecture karo please
@javedzehri1213 жыл бұрын
Resounding success
@zeebahashmi71604 жыл бұрын
Well explained brother
@rehmanahmad66024 жыл бұрын
Sir ap biref ke sath Bacha khan pa video banaye .hum apke video ka mantazir han .
@Entertainmentwithlearning3 жыл бұрын
Original version of Hinduism is"Arya Samaj" which was revived in your West Punjab
@arifshahzad46984 жыл бұрын
Beautifully explained very thing, Thank you very much Taimur Sab.
@waqarkhan89763 жыл бұрын
Sir plz recommends book
@mukhtarktalnikar41744 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot explaining so well
@shagbutt59696 жыл бұрын
Kindly Water Crisis pr bhi video bnae.
@Ben_Kaushalesh6 жыл бұрын
Why Pakistan did not recreate Aligarh Muslim University in Pakistan like India recreated Punjab University and many other institutions after partition?
@modoodfareed58745 жыл бұрын
Sir Karl marks ki political thoughts pe b video banao???
@mansoorzaman66014 жыл бұрын
Sir..what is the name of this book ..from which u have taken the lecture
@mariammeer63386 жыл бұрын
Wow...You make things really easy.One question is badly stuck in my mind that how sir Syed could interpret quranic verses that way?He didn't see or observe all that to comment with such surity.Few verses are clear cut mentioned and they can't be just metaphors.
@tabishpoet64852 жыл бұрын
U can get ans by molana ishaq
@asgharkhanutmankhel94686 жыл бұрын
یہ تو معاملہ وہی ہوا جو اج عمران خان کے ساتھ ہے۔۔۔۔ ایک طرف مدینہ کی ریاست اور دوسری طرف عملی زندگی۔۔۔۔!
@sohailanwarvohra98382 жыл бұрын
Well explained
@wehayat90502 жыл бұрын
As usual a through provoking video.
@shaneali22124 жыл бұрын
Great sir...
@xman75443 жыл бұрын
Sir what you wanna say Can you plz clear jinnah contracdition
@qurat-ul-ainfirdous12324 ай бұрын
Wah bai sir syed sahab! Puray Quran ko he mahawra bnna deya.
@haidernasar56316 жыл бұрын
Please sir book name bta day jisma ya sb lika hai
@hindavinama94414 жыл бұрын
Ser yahan bharat me do qaumi nazariye ko lekar badi bahsen hoti hain lekin ham nahin jante ki pakistan men ise kis tarah dekha jata hai meri ajizana guzaarish hai ki aap do qaumi nazariye par bhi kuch video banaen ki jisse ham sab talibe ilm faiziyab ho saken. Shukriyaa