‪@JLWarren‬

Рет қаралды 1,360

breakfasttacos

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 59

@BarrySchanz 2 ай бұрын

Bridge the Divide is JL Warren's channel Good showing

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Yes JL is awesome!!!

@sticks1990 2 ай бұрын

Couldn’t get through this, felt my brain melting from the terrible convo management

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

LOL

@youarevictoria4981 2 ай бұрын

They do not even have the tomb, let alone a rock that may or may not have been at the entrance.

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Great point!

@beedub_ 2 ай бұрын

JL single-handedly owning the whole room, easily able to define every fallacy he cites and clearly breaking down the nonsense presented against him, while being constantly muted and talked over by absolute morons. Love to see it 😂

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Yes he did well.

@zgs12212012 2 ай бұрын

Another great video from BT!

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Thank you!

@ianchisholm5756 2 ай бұрын

'Why would Josephus have to be there to be a witness?'

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Honestly I don't remember what you are referring to at this point and I'm sorry

@benduhova1643 2 ай бұрын

That babbling sounds like the ape monsters in the C64 game flash gordon

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

I don't even notice it anymore lol

@GentleGiantJoe 2 ай бұрын

How pathetic. They mute any opposition to the point of completely killing any progress of talking. So much so that the whole chat room just becomes a circle jerk of religious doctrine. And they wonder why their such a dead group of guys who can't get anywhere in life. Barth is still doing the same things he has for years it seems. It would be more hilarious if it wasn't so pathetically sad. Barth sounds like he's drunk driving again while chatting.

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Yes it was very sad/d.

@Beldiin 2 ай бұрын

They couldn't put their opposition to the sword like their forebears did. Mute is all they have.

@lumpheadthump 2 ай бұрын

Tacitus wasn’t around either.

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Great point!

@alexanderingraham8255 2 ай бұрын

I’m going to need a definition for Chico’s understanding of what “pseudo-industrialism” is and then a lot of citations showing that it applies to the Romans…

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

LOL

@alexanderingraham8255 2 ай бұрын

I’m fairly certain Paulogia and Dr. Bart Erhman (sp?) did a whole video debunking the empty tomb claim.

@Uryvichk 2 ай бұрын

It's the worst argument I can think of. First, there wasn't a tomb. Second, even if there was, there's literally a more plausible alternative suggested in Matthew: Someone stole the body. Unless they can completely rule out ANY possibility of the body being stolen, they can never get to the interpretation of events they want even if they're spotted an empty tomb (which, again, should not be conceded to them as they haven't earned it). "But the disciples wouldn't-" Oh? When did anyone say disciples? Could've been random tomb robbers. Could've been Joseph of Arimethea having the body relocated because he only wanted it in his family tomb temporarily. Or if it was disciples, it could've been just one or two of them acting on their own, so the others didn't know about it. Unless they can formulate a plausible argument for why a man rising from the dead is more likely than "tomb robbers stole the body to be carved up and sold as reagents in Egyptian necromancy" (an actual problem at the time), they got nothin'.

@Nocturnalux 2 ай бұрын

@@UryvichkWe know grave robbers were common enough around that time, they are even mentioned in a first century early Greek novel, Callirhoe, in which the female lead is presumed dead, entombed, found alive by grave robbers who then kidnap her. Upon finding the missing tomb, her fiance, who thought he had accidentally killed her, is shocked but soon realizes it was grave robbers who took her. Grave robbing is also mentioned in The Golden Ass, in which we are told rich families in Thrace even hired people to watch over their deceased before burial as robbing the dead for their parts, for sympathetic magic purposes, was just that common. While these are fictional accounts and written as such, and do not take place in the Middle East, they do show that robbing the dead was a common enough feature in the wider region that you could easily weave it into your story.

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

I wouldn't be surprised if they did.

@sticks1990 2 ай бұрын

If Chico can barely speak coherently. Why is Warren expecting him to be able to understand what’s written in Scripture?

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

LOL

@Christfollower4 2 ай бұрын

Tacos when are we getting the Unitarian guy vs the whole room of trinitarians? 😂

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

I'm not gonna lie, I have no idea if I deleted it or not lol.

@Christfollower4 2 ай бұрын

@@realBreakfasttacos fair enough

@Christfollower4 2 ай бұрын

@@realBreakfasttacosif you find it I’ll be sure to watch let me known

@orinjayce 2 ай бұрын

Worse than flat earthers

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Always

@peterwyetzner5276 2 ай бұрын

The idea of "recorded somewhere in history" isn't very compelling- the idea of keeping records about "everything", and turning those records into historical accounts, didn't exist in the ancient Mediterranean; what we have is a relatively small number of books about things that interested the authors, mostly wars; and most of those societies didn't have extensive record-keeping. For example, it's generally believed that the sources of the Roman historian Livy were books commissioned by important families to describe the deeds of their famous ancestors.

@realBreakfasttacos 2 ай бұрын

Great point! Someone would have wrote about zombies though.