Sounds like someone doesn't understand weather forecasts. The percentage chance of rain is based on the number of models/projections that resulted in rain; given initial conditions. Everyone decides how to react given the info.
@andralfoo17 минут бұрын
you either believe or you dont, you either accept a proposition as true or likely true, or you dont What is the alternative?
@dustinmorton94248 минут бұрын
This needed to be modded better. So much over talk nearly everything was impossible to hear.
@Weirdaman56 минут бұрын
World Word Salad Championship 2025
@CoderOfBugsСағат бұрын
Chico is obnoxious. Holy shit
@autarkenСағат бұрын
are these mfers really saying you have to cognitively comprehend the law of non-contradiction to understand that you're hungry as an infant?!??!? *every animal* reacts that way biologically... are they arguing for the souls and logical cognition of baby birds, puppies, fish, etc? if they are let's hear that argument, but I'm pretty sure that contradicts their world view
@docbauk3643Сағат бұрын
How can a Christian presuppositionalist ever win an argument? Only atheist presupposition had a grounding!!!!
@ezbody2 сағат бұрын
Baked Brain Alaska, always asks questions, never learns anything.
@ceedubya46343 сағат бұрын
Rough stuff
@evergIide153 сағат бұрын
You see Manars debate with Deconstruction Zone?
@rostamanFoSho3 сағат бұрын
Baked Alaska is also Mark, but the asshole version. I cannot stand either persona, however.
@enslavedbytruth3 сағат бұрын
Variations: 1. I believe in God and its the real actual God 2. I believe in God, and its the wrong actual God. 3. I dont believe in a particular God, but that God is actually Real. 4. I dont believe in a particular God, but that God is not actually real.... And so on....and so on
@louseveryann21814 сағат бұрын
Cultists, your "beliefs" are personal. Nobody cares about them but you, because they're personal. Whatever you think you can "prove" is just "proof" for yourself, no one else. You're only convincing yourself. Science works on evidence. "Faith" works on "beliefs". Get it through your thick skulls.
@feifeicuttie4 сағат бұрын
Who cares if it rains or not? The only thing that matters is if i bring my umbrella. Which i can do even if it doesn't rain...😂😂
@FullOnMetalHead19954 сағат бұрын
Cheeko wrecked yall
@grahamclarke8464 сағат бұрын
He unironicly said that a Christian who thinks his car is in his garage and isn't justified would automatically think it WAS justified simply be because he's a Christian. The guy is an absolute moron 😂
@Jessica_O_Bell5 сағат бұрын
"Belief" is a human concept. We invented the term. We noticed that something existed within human culture, namely a cognitive orientation towards a proposition, and we created a word to describe and explain this phenomenon. The laws of logic are properties of nature. We notice that nature behaves in a particular way. We use this term to describe this phenomenon. This phenomenon is objective, thus it would still exist even if humans didn't. Using a law of logic of nature onto a feature of the human mind is like trying to figure out what colour is Perry Como's song Magic Moments.
@Noetic-Necrognosis4 сағат бұрын
The laws of logic are metaphysical principles of being. They aren't empirical. You can't see, hear, smell, taste or touch a law of logic
@louseveryann21814 сағат бұрын
@@Noetic-Necrognosis So is your mother.
@CoderOfBugs2 сағат бұрын
@@Noetic-Necrognosis You can see that a light is either a degree of on or off, though. Logic seems to be descriptive. It's able to describe what has been observed. Of course you can't sense a descriptor.
@RatedDehydrated5 сағат бұрын
1:43:11 sounds like projection. The Theist is actually suppressing the truth of our shared atheistic naturalistic reality by claiming that a God exists.
@Jessica_O_Bell5 сағат бұрын
This is absolutely wild. The Christian apologist is using the law of excluded middle means that all types of agnosticism, moderate confidence, fence-sitting and acute openness are irrational and logically impossible positions. First of all, we do that sort of thing all the time in our everyday lives. Most of the thoughts that go through our head each day involve evaluating our limited access to evidence and orienting ourselves in proportion to our confidence in our assessments. Secondly, it is absolutely foolish to tey to use a law of logic to something as fluid and dynamic and irrational and unstable as human thinking.
@Jessica_O_Bell5 сағат бұрын
Let me just give an example to prove my point. Many years ago, a journalist once suggested that Donald Trump has a collection of Hitler's speeches on his bedside table, which he reads regularly before bed. I obviously have no means to actually collect any primary evidence to test or verify this claim. The claim cannot be tested per se. All I have to go on is my prior knowledge of Trump and his lifestyle, and to decide whether or not it sounds reasonable or plausible to me that this could be true. In other words, I don't 100% believe this claim to be true, nor do I 100% believe this claim to be false. On the one hand, Trump is not a big reader. I doubt he owns any books at all. So the notion that he has a book on his bedside table sounds absurd. On the other hand, Trump is very clever at using rightwing rhetoric and language in order to further his political agenda. So maybe he consulted with the works of Hitler and learnt a trick or two. It sounds kind of plausible. And also, this claim kind of sounds like a false flag. It's just the kind of dumb, fake story that liberals would want to be true and would likely repeat without any regardless for its truthfulness. And so, at the end of my assessment of the evidence, I give this claim a 25% chance of being true.
@rembrandt972ify4 сағат бұрын
@@Jessica_O_Bell One of Trump's ex-wives, Ivana, originally reported the book. BTW, he owns 1000s of books and he will sell you one for only $69.99.
@FrikkinLazer6 сағат бұрын
How does revelatory epistemology give you the ability to determine that it will or will not rain tomorrow with 100% certainty? Surely they must also work on confidence levels? Let me rephrase the question. What the fuck is going on here?
@andrewballard27836 сағат бұрын
Wellllll, when a father doesn't give their child enough love..... Mostly joking but it's like a trauma response combined with postering.
@MartinMensch6 сағат бұрын
Finally someone pressed a pressup on the cogito. Each time i heard a presup claiming "you cant justify anything", i always wondered how they would respond to the cogito, that is, that at least i can know one thing, that i exist.
@TheWileGuy6 сағат бұрын
TJump did that with DD and Old Gary blew a gasket if I remember correctly.
@MartinMensch6 сағат бұрын
Tnx, didn't saw that video. But being Gary I don't have high expectensions of his response
@andralfoo29 минут бұрын
hi do you not consider cogito circular?
@MartinMensch6 минут бұрын
@@andralfoo how?
@MartinMenschМинут бұрын
@@andralfoo Descartes says: After reaching the bottom of the doubt, after concluding I can't be certain I'm dreaming or just imagining everything, or maybe that a demon ia making me get the wrong answer every time I sum 1 plus 1. Then, how do i know even I exist? Well, if I doubt that I exist, there is still an I to doubt. Even If I doubt that I doubt, still there is an I. If I'm wrong about me existing, event then there is still an I to be wrong. I doubt, therefore I am.
@derkylos7 сағат бұрын
"Stop sperging out and interrupting me while I sperg out and interrupt you!"
@chrisknowles53588 сағат бұрын
I CAN’T STAND listening to this narcissist!
@NullHypatheist8 сағат бұрын
The laws of logic are not descriptive, they are PREscriptive. As a point of clarify, they were originally called laws of thought. They are recommendations for how to reason in an effective way. They are no more “always true everywhere at every time” as the speed limit is 50mph. It’s a suggestion, not a rule.
@edvardm434813 сағат бұрын
I'm sure Matt Slick is also a fallibilist, he's just not aware of it. He cannot be certain he's not going to die while going out to grocery store. We constantly, literally risk our lives when we do pretty much anything. There's always non-zero chance that whatever we do or don't do, we're going to die, but it doesn't prevent us from doing things. Having "only" 99.99999+ trust on something doesn't mean that it's irrational to do it. We don't need absolute certainty for anything, and being fallibilist doesn't mean one doesn't rely on logic or axioms of math. We can't prove anything to be absolutely true, but nobody cares, except TAG idiots.
@realBreakfasttacos11 сағат бұрын
Excellent points!
@davegar181613 сағат бұрын
I want merch.
@realBreakfasttacos12 сағат бұрын
Excellent idea! LOL! I don't even know where to begin with that tbh.
@13shadowwolf14 сағат бұрын
I have always thought that "X group is god's chosen people" is about the most arrogant stance someone could take, short of claiming to be a "god" themselves. Monotheistic Hyper-Arrogance on full display.
@realBreakfasttacos11 сағат бұрын
You are 100% correct!
@13shadowwolf14 сағат бұрын
Matt Slick: used-god salesman with a Self-Justification loop of nonsensical gibberish word games. His position is equal parts Ignorance and Arrogance. He has no justification for any of his claims, he talks down to people while pretending to be polite. The fact that this is his career, really demonstrates the poor educational standards in much of the USA. Nobody with a decent education is going to buy this guys garbage, his entire fan base is from bottom of the barrel of anti-intellectualism trolls.
@pingopongo2116 сағат бұрын
Delighted to hear in the first minute in that super creepy voice "what is the swiiiiiiines' purpose?".
@realBreakfasttacos11 сағат бұрын
Mr. Batman is the best!
@alexritchie458616 сағат бұрын
The human race made a wrong turn when it decided 'Because my invisible sky-wizard friend told me so!' should get tax exemption instead of a trip to the loony bin.
@13shadowwolf16 сағат бұрын
Yes, Order does arise from Disorder, because it's not a black/white dichotomy, Order/Disorder is a sliding scale of comparison. We compare levels of Chaos/Order, it's not that there's a specific line that you cross when something becomes stops being disordered and becomes ordered. So what the problem is, yet again, that Theists try to oversimply a concept to make a claim for their beliefs. Less disordered things come from more disordered things, therefore order arises from disorder.
@realBreakfasttacos11 сағат бұрын
Entropy is a measure of disorder. It gets more disordered over time as change occurs.
@platotots17 сағат бұрын
The problem with slick of the bat is it's just platonism run amuck. When he asks does the universe operate under the laws of physics, thats a massive misunderstanding of what a nominalist thinks. It's always fun to ask people like matt where the laws of physics are. He's making a massive claim that can be falsified.
@realBreakfasttacos10 сағат бұрын
It's just reification.
@jcg767217 сағат бұрын
sola scriptura is built on a house of cards, because it requires the authenticity of biblical authorship which cannot be supported by any archaeological records. If the early teachings of the church (customs) are not truth tracking, then neither is the Bible which was written after those customs were established. Which is pretty much what I believe but it’s the double edged sword of Slick’s argument.
@realBreakfasttacos10 сағат бұрын
Great point!
@13shadowwolf18 сағат бұрын
To Baked Alaska: drop the "beleif brings about pragmatic X"; this is a very bad argument because it justifies ANY beleif system that has "pragmatic" value. Scientology gives all the same positive social benefits that Christianity does, but you'd never hear a Christian arguing for the pragmatic value of Scientology based morality. I have yet to hear an argument for Christianity that couldn't be re-worded to be equally justification for Scientology. What is the "grounding of all Logic"? Well it's equally valid to argue that it is due to the alien Spirits that inhabit people and give them inspiration. Baked Alaska will never add anything of value to any conversation, he's a registration loop of gibberish definitions. The statement "gounding of all being" has as much value as "purple tastes like a boxing match" The proper definition of Theologian is "Expert in Cult-Think"
@realBreakfasttacos10 сағат бұрын
Excellent points!
@rafaelallenblock18 сағат бұрын
Matt is a professional liar. In a discussion with Alex Malpas he conceded he works from a script: when Alex tried for an hour to show how Matt's argument was based on affirming the consequent, Matt claimed he couldn't understand the issue but appreciated the opportunity to FINE TUNE HIS SCRIPT. What a weasel. Also, his 'tell' when he knows he's trapped is his cough.
@realBreakfasttacos18 сағат бұрын
Very interesting!
@JamesTheTank20 сағат бұрын
I have a newfound respect for Face
@realBreakfasttacos18 сағат бұрын
Yes, he is a tank ;)
@davids1113111321 сағат бұрын
Slick had his apprenticeship under Darth Dawkins a couple years ago, and you can really hear the Darth in him now……I mean Slick used to be bad before that, but now he’s got this new level of scum on him. ‘May the blessed Virgin Mary hear your prayers’ … yea ok so what? That’s not praying to Mary, I mean I’d like to ask Slick ‘Why do you hate Jesus mom SO MUCH?’ … ‘Mary is such an inferior person, that you shouldn’t pay her any mind?’ … what? I mean I’m not religious at all, but this stuff from Slick is just CREEPY! Then Slick is implying they think Mary is equal to God? Really I think Slick has some serious mental problems at this point.
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
I'm not quite sure what is going on with Slick but he really enjoys debating other Christians lol.
@davids1113111321 сағат бұрын
Is Slick talking about ‘Hail Mary’… that’s just from the Bible what the angel said to Mary, it’s not praying to Mary. Wow Slick is so dumb it’s just wild.
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
LOL
@childs4remodel21 сағат бұрын
Holy shit, it never ends Christians have to deflect, you can’t apply reasonable common sense to anything because they have to justify the ridiculous, impossible belief, just saying good job JL
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Yep! JL is awesome!
@hailsagan888621 сағат бұрын
I love watching theists argue over who has the best imaginary friend 😂
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Me too!!
@spoonssoup67399 сағат бұрын
u digging in me
@k3n0ju22 сағат бұрын
Obi Wan Kenobi didn't recognize R2D2 in ANH. Obi Wan Kenobi forgot Leia was Force Sensitive in ESB. Obi Wan Kenobi was suffering from alzheimers in both his human and Force Ghost forms.
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Interesting!!!
@CutleryDuck22 сағат бұрын
1:37 Faith - strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof = prayer, God's existence, the divinity of Jesus, inerrancy of the Bible etc. vs. Trust - firm belief in the reliability, truth, or ability of someone or something = turning the key in your car's ignition, the sweetness of an apple, the satisfaction of a Tuesday afternoon poop, ducks preferring to poop on white cars, scratching an itch, poop is stinky (except duck poo) etc. Someone needs to start hammering the difference into theists. Matt always does this. His d*ckshit argumentation couldn't function without the conflation.
@CutleryDuck22 сағат бұрын
5 minutes in, and Matt is speedrunning through his bs.
@davids1113111322 сағат бұрын
Slick is so weird.
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Agreed!
@13shadowwolf14 сағат бұрын
Slick is intellectually broken, his only skill appears to be an expertise in his favorite mythology. I'd like to hear Slick argue with a Scientology Apologist that uses all the Presup arguments to "prove" Scientology.
@jamierichardson768323 сағат бұрын
Batman, now slick going on snd on. Why do you hate us so?😎
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
It is love, not hate.
@midlander4Күн бұрын
Ol creepy voice again. Still no sky wizard
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Yep!
@deedrabbitКүн бұрын
Darth was very abusive. I feel bad for what his poor wife had to go through.
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Great point!
@anthonyzav3769Күн бұрын
As an atheist listening to this I’m simply amazed hearing the different sects squabble.
@frankquinn406922 сағат бұрын
Totally agree. Its mind boggling 😂
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
It is like listening to a DND game.
@niddy-2.020 сағат бұрын
Even if by some whacky scenario I become convinced of at least Jesus did the things... that god would still be cruel to make it impossible to find sensible community
@anthonyzav376919 сағат бұрын
@@realBreakfasttacosthe craziest part was when Slick asserted the guy who includes Mary in his prayers is doing Satan’s work - it really got me thinking about the nature of morality, intention and action - so a Christian who lives a genuinely compassionate life is doing Satan’s work? To what end? So what is all the theology for? If his and Slick’s life are outwardly the same but the theology is different what is the actual pragmatic effect on the community around them? The Prime Mover is truly angry at the Mary prayer?
@realBreakfasttacos18 сағат бұрын
@@niddy-2.0 Great point!
@smolderingtitanКүн бұрын
He's so dry with his insults. "You don't realize, but you've just shot yourself in the foot. But I'll expose your wounds here in a little bit..." Glad he wasn't my Dad.
@jamierichardson768323 сағат бұрын
Ask Rachel his daughter. She wouldn't argue
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Agreed!
@deedrabbitКүн бұрын
He says Warren doesn't Christianity but there a million denominations of Christianity. Which ones doesn't he understand?
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Probably like 900000 of them!
@deedrabbitКүн бұрын
It doesn't say in the bible anywhere that there will be sorrow in heaven. Nothing he says is biblical. It's all out of his ass.
@realBreakfasttacos21 сағат бұрын
Interesting!
@danpettinger1353Күн бұрын
Just starting the vid, does he do his little cough thing everytime he is under pressure/being dishonest?