Thank you for the information. The content is exactly what I need for a guide.
@janetgarner73263 жыл бұрын
So glad I found this recorded webinar, just struggling with the focus of my scoping review at the moment!
@davidofili91533 жыл бұрын
Comprehensive and highly helpful. Thanks for making the recording available
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@atikahbalqisf3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! So glad that i found it saved on youtube. I’m conducting this scoping review for my master degree and it’s really helpful. Thank you
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@sangduanginggeaw83022 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this presentation. It was apparent and helpful.
@donnamac Жыл бұрын
Thank you this has been so helpful as I embark on my dissertation.
@ndasowachitule90802 жыл бұрын
Very useful information and well presented! glad I found this!
@JBIEBHC2 жыл бұрын
So happy you found this information useful! You may find more free resources that help you at jbi.global/scoping-review-network/resources
@annahlesunyane46413 жыл бұрын
Very useful information. Thank you very much for the recording
@andersonfujihara1485 Жыл бұрын
That was very helpful. Many thanks
@p.j3573 Жыл бұрын
Very useful, thank u so much.
@subashpalanisamy31773 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing such an informative session
@munukon64183 жыл бұрын
Nice presentation and very informative. Thanks for the update.
@abolfazlmohammadi7393 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing! Very informative.
@abrahamkuot83814 жыл бұрын
Great presentation; thanks for recording it.
@JBIEBHC4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@kudzanayinemiahchigangaidz92542 жыл бұрын
Very helpful information
@dataunud15083 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. It is very helpful
@MeducationAC9 ай бұрын
Great presentation! Thank you
@pamelaphipps467216 күн бұрын
I am new to Scoping.
@sharadaregmi22354 жыл бұрын
Very helpful!
@JBIEBHC4 жыл бұрын
Glad you think so!
@dimasdimasalang Жыл бұрын
Thank you, JBI. What is the minimum number of articles for a scoping review?
@JBIEBHC Жыл бұрын
Hi Dimas, There is no specific minimum number of studied included in a scoping review. However, scoping reviews typically aim to cover a comprehensive range of studies that are relevant to the review questions. The number of studies may vary widely depending on the specific research question and scope of the review.
@tanvirrahman2724 Жыл бұрын
Worthy to watch for my scoping review. I have a query - Should i include abstract articles for my literature review? I have selected 24 articles for final review and 6 of them are Abstract articles.
@JBIEBHC Жыл бұрын
Hi Tanvir, Scoping reviews do allow for a broad range of evidence. Conference abstracts as a type of grey literature can be included in a scoping review if they are relevant to your review question and meet your inclusion criteria. Sometimes reviewers might limit it to particular study designs. For example, if the review question is about mapping a concept related to clinical trials, they may only need to include clinical trials.
@sini39928 күн бұрын
Thanks for the video! I need to assess the risk of bias in my scoping review. Which tool can you recommend if I want to display all my results in one tableau? As the review includes a variety of kind of studies that seems quite difficult... Thanks for your help!
@JBIEBHC4 күн бұрын
JBI guidance doesn’t recommend conducting critical appraisal for scoping reviews. journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/recommendations_for_the_extraction,_analysis,_and.7.aspx. As you mentioned, it can be quite challenging due to the diverse range of studies they encompass. Please feel free to contact jbisynthesis@adelaide.edu.au if you have any further queries!
@callmeadocter4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this presentation, it was helpful to answer a few that I had. could it be possible to provide the links that were mentioned in the presentation for references in the results section about PRISMA-ScR checklist and related documents? Thank you in advance.
@JBIEBHC4 жыл бұрын
Glad you found the webinar useful! Thanks for your request; more links to resources have been added to the video description.
@iffatzafar37853 жыл бұрын
I would like to know what form are you talking about at 29:21?. Is it an automated tool to download a table form of the finalised studies?. I am a bit lost for this form?.
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
Here Andrea is talking about data extraction. In scoping reviews, the data extraction process may be referred to as “data charting”. Guidance on creating your own data charting form can be found here, wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/11.2.7+Data+extraction. Additionally, this article by Pollock et al (2021) does describe how to develop a data extraction tool that is relevant to your scoping review: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jan.14743. Good luck!
@faroukgarba68772 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this. A very informative video. Just to clarify, we have both the scoping review protocol and the main scoping review which we can both publish?
@JBIEBHC2 жыл бұрын
Glad you found the webinar to be informative. Protocols may be published prior to completing a review, as they pre-define the objectives, methods, and reporting of the review and allow for transparency of the process. For more information, please see: jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/3283910908/11.2+Development+of+a+scoping+review+protocol
@rodolfobastianvallekendall2 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for this information. Do you officially recommend any kind of software?
@JBIEBHC2 жыл бұрын
JBI SUMARI provides support for the entire scoping review process (from protocol to report) and is designed using the methodology discussed in the webinar. You can try JBI SUMARI for free. sumari.jbi.global/
@isabelomalley65932 жыл бұрын
We have 407 studies included in our scoping review. I understand we can put the results of individual sources of evidence in an appendix (Tricco 2018, Item 20), thankfully. I'm looking for guidance on how to decide which individual studies to include in the manuscript. I know it will depend on our research question, but are you aware of any similarly large scoping reviews that you recommend we look at for examples?
@JBIEBHC2 жыл бұрын
Hi Isabel, Dr Lyndsay Alexander recently completed a scoping review with 555 included sources of evidence. You may find the advice she gives from her experience useful. Watch: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iqvCgWiYja19kKM
@isabelomalley65932 жыл бұрын
@@JBIEBHC Thank you!
@pamelaphipps467216 күн бұрын
Could you tell me about the research question, I'm confused. Do I create the question, is it the publication authors' question? How is the question created and by whom please?
@JBIEBHC10 күн бұрын
Hi Pamela, The research question is the question that guides the conduct of the scoping review, not the publication authors’ question. The review question is identified and created by the review team. Please check the JBI Manual of Evidence Synthesis for details at jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355862667/10.2.2+Developing+the+title+and+question Alternatively you can reach out to jbisynthesis@adelaide.edu.au if you have further questions.
@Fanclub909 Жыл бұрын
Hi I am new too
@Sr-fu5sw Жыл бұрын
Hi. Could u pls teach how to do the there step search for an example using PubMEd
@JBIEBHC Жыл бұрын
Dr Pollock outlines the three steps for searching in a short video at kzbin.info/www/bejne/bIW3qmCpptGKkK8 You may find this useful. Also, guidance is provided in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis at jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
@clementinepouliot34683 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing! What data extraction tool would you recommend for a scoping review ?
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
We are glad you found this video useful! First of all, you can find the latest methodological guidance for data extraction for a scoping review at wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/11.2.7+Data+extraction JBI SUMARI is software that you can use to conduct 10 different types of reviews, including scoping reviews. You can see how it facilitates data extraction at kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJPcgJemdpZ0qpo
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
There are no formal data extraction tools that we make for scoping reviews. We generally find extraction in scoping reviews is an iterative process, therefore, your extraction tool is subject to change. This article by Pollock et al (2021) does describe how to develop a data extraction tool that is relevant to your scoping review: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jan.14743
@clementinepouliot34683 жыл бұрын
@@JBIEBHC Wow thank you for your quick answer, I'll look into it !
@JBIEBHC Жыл бұрын
@myszku1Hi there, please try the link at pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33543511/ to browse this resource.
@chinnyebisi97202 ай бұрын
What year did JBI refine and defined scoping review methodology?
@JBIEBHC2 ай бұрын
JBI’s first guidance on scoping review was published in 2015, with major updates and clarifications published in 2020. You can find JBI's latest guidance for reviewers in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. There is a chapter devoted to scoping reviews: jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355862497/10.+Scoping+reviews Here are some references: Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141-6. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119-26.
@shadialhag66163 жыл бұрын
Hello, is it possible to send a more clarification on this topic, for example,pdf file, what is JBI ?
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
Hello, JBI is an international research organisation that develops and delivers unique evidence-based information, software, education and training designed to improve healthcare practice and health outcomes. You can learn more at jbi.global. Useful resources for JBI Scoping Review methodology include jbi.global/scoping-review-network and the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Chapter in synthesismanual.jbi.global
@prashantabhowmik76702 жыл бұрын
Data charting template link does not work. Could you please provide some links to get the template?
@JBIEBHC2 жыл бұрын
The link to the template in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis is in the Scoping Reviews chapter (Chapter 11), Appendix 1: jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/4687579/Appendix+11.1+JBI+template+source+of+evidence+details%2C+characteristics+and+results+extraction+instrument
@jamess55423 жыл бұрын
Are there sample papers that one could peruse, especially in disciplines such as psychology and social sciences?
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
Hi James, JBI Evidence Synthesis publishes scoping reviews and scoping review protocols, however they focus more on healthcare. The journal is at jbievidencesynthesis.com
@hgVelvet3 жыл бұрын
Can scoping reviews include both quantitate data and qualitative data? Or would a mixed method review be more apt in that case?
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
Scoping reviews can include both quantitative and qualitative evidence in the form of peer-reviewed articles, guidelines, websites, blogs, etc. Deciding on whether this approach, or a mixed methods systematic review is more appropriate depends on the research question. If your question is about the feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness of a particular topic, then a systematic review (such as a mixed methods systematic review) would be more appropriate. If you would like to read more about how to choose between a systematic review or a scoping review, a very helpful article by Assoc Prof Munn is at bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x You could also have a look at the short 'Ask JBI' video, 'Should I undertake a scoping review or a systematic review?' On our channel.
@hgVelvet3 жыл бұрын
@@JBIEBHC Excellent, thank you for this answer and for these really helpful videos.
@Djibril213 жыл бұрын
Hey every1 :) can somebody guide me on whether scoping reviews are inferior than systematic reviews
@JBIEBHC3 жыл бұрын
Hi Almas, scoping reviews are not inferior to systematic reviews; they just ask different questions. For example, if a reviewer wants to know if something is clinically effective, appropriate, meaningful or understand the experience of that intervention or concept, and they want those results to make clinical or policy change, then a systematic review is the right approach. On the other hand, if a reviewer is more interested in the identification of certain characteristics/ concepts in papers or studies, and in the mapping, reporting or discussion of these characteristics/ concepts, then a scoping review is the better choice. I hope this helps. There are resources that you may find useful at the JBI Scoping Network at jbi.global/scoping-review-network
@Djibril213 жыл бұрын
@@JBIEBHC thank you very much for your informative response :) i follow JBI religiously. Keep up the good work !