Joe Rogan & Candace Owens ARGUE Over Climate Change

[@mustbewilson]

Climate change shouldn't be a right or left subject. Just an issue.

[@ethantaub8846]

JESSE WILSON yup, I’m right/conservative but believe in climate change, it’s scientifically proven

[@thegoat-ishere4414]

JESSE WILSON Too bad Big Oil Business corrupted one side of politics to be ‘skeptics’ of the science of anthropogenic climate change (in reality they are usually just denying).

[@actionjackson1173]

Its weird how it became that way.

[@EasternManiac]

The far right and far left cannot budge in their beliefs. So annoying. I’m right, but if something is proven or makes sense, I tend to believe it.

[@soka227]

Its so fucking weird that its a right and left issue

[@jessicaclark7130]

I think Joe got another forehead wrinkle during this convo

[@randyyoung9892]

Joe's a moron

[@ChocoDee_Hz]

Every time her mouth opens

[@JozVerse]

Jessica W lol

[@gauravbasu98]

She believes science is not real, I believe she is shit!!!

[@ramishbutt6715]

@Very Fake News CNN Are you stupid. Scientists around the globe are saying so and warn us. Look up the greenhouse effect and look up a graph There you go

[@brbosen]

Joe Rogan's patience and willingness to listen to people he disagrees with is so refreshing.

[@brawnerbandwidthmusic2529]

I’ll give Joe credit every time when he’s critical 👍

[@jaguaranmusk3703]

Joe Rogan needs to get himself educated around this subject. He and others in the comment section need to know how deep the rabbit hole runs. For starters, begin your adventure with Al Gore's professor. I promise you, it is damn good ride and it will change you completely whenever they start whining about climate change.

[@stacychew4175]

She’s is very nice to look at but not that bright. He has more patience than I.

[@jack.20f74]

@@stacychew4175 Oh bc you've seen one video of her talking about a topic that she barely knew about and Rogan stuck to because he wanted to make her look bad. Okay Stacy.

[@chrisjoshua69420]

all of us as human beings needa strive to be like this honestly

[@Kixkboxer]

Rogan: have you done your research on climate change? Candice: No

[@Pow_FIsh]

when the subject is a psyop being less educated is better.

[@vhufeosqap]

@@Pow_FIshbrainrot

[@Pow_FIsh]

@@vhufeosqap how many boosters vaxxie?

[@vhufeosqap]

@@Pow_FIsh 300

[@Pow_FIsh]

@@vhufeosqap its good you're ashamed you should be.

[@Sev826]

"Yeah the climate changing, the weather was different yesterday" PACK IT UP BOYS, SCIENCE HAS BEEN DISPROVED

[@madhatter4173]

She formed a very strong opinion after one night of 'deep diving' into a couple of articles. I'm not from the US and a touch confused...is she actually considered as bright over there?

[@Sev826]

@@madhatter4173 I'm not from the us either, but I think a lot of Americans would not consider her bright. But a lot probably would, which is a tad frightening

[@yovonne7]

🤣🙌🏼😂😂

[@josuke6869]

Tis fucking hilarious comment man 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@jordanp8063]

Science never proved anything. If you believe science leads to objective truths you're a sheep

[@bubba_swag5258]

Why did I choose to click on this and feel pain for 20 minutes.

[@caitthecat]

Cuz it hurts so good.

[@edwingeorge6094]

I don't know, I feel a little better about myself.

[@robertodegolladojr992]

Because its a woman

[@rhythemandpoetry]

Because attempting to understand others means more to you than holding your opinions higher than others.

[@piggamer3154]

All of these comment replies are massive copes. Dont let them tell you this video isn't pure pain that hasn't brought out anything good to think or feel about yourself or anyone or anything

[@brandon9089]

THE PROBLEM IS: she’s disbelieving as a DEFAULT. that’s insane. the DEFAULT should be neutral. “i don’t know” is so much wiser than sure disbelief by default.

[@cl20999]

Very well said. We all have bias and skepticism but you can't just begin every topic assuming it's a conspiracy and a lie.

[@otaviolimirio1]

Nobody knows. It's not even a consensus in the scientific community. She's totally correct in just giving her opinion and saying what she believes or not. Believing is different than knowing. Joe, on the other side, has been pushing her all time to agreeing with his stance.

[@codmott286]

@@otaviolimirio1 Believing is not different than knowing. Belief just means you think you know. If you dont know how to perform open heart surgery you dont say "i dont believe it's possible". You say "i dont know wtf im talking about so I'm going to stand back and let the experts handle this". She's somehow trying to have it both ways, by saying she neither understands the subject but also has enough information to flat out reject it, which makes no sense.

[@y2kblackout]

No, that's not the problem and disbelief should be the default. The problem is that she doesn't understand and confines to maintain her default position.

[@codmott286]

@@y2kblackout disbelief should NOT be the default. By saying you dont believe something you are giving an affirmative response. You can never affirm something without knowing, so your default answer should always be "i dont know".

[@PPSainity]

The backpedaling is off the charts. As much as she claims she does not want to die on that hill, she sure is coming off as a victim on it.

[@hoon_sol]

It's called "backpedaling", as in when you pedal a vehicle backwards instead of forwards.

[@PPSainity]

@@hoon_sol thanks, you can rest easily now that I fixed that typo on a 2 month old comment.

[@hoon_sol]

@@PPSainity: There's a big difference between a typo and a misspelling; in the former case you know how to spell it but made some error while writing it (like missing a character or hitting a different character, or maybe an extra space, and so on), whereas in the latter case you think a word is spelled in a different way than it really is. So me correcting you on it should ideally be welcomed by you, since you have now learnt how to spell it correctly. But thanks, I'll sleep quite peacefully tonight indeed.

[@PPSainity]

@@hoon_sol whatever gotta tell yourself my dude.

[@hoon_sol]

@@PPSainity: I'm just stating the facts. Saying "backpeddling" is an extremely common misspelling of "backpedaling", and not something you accidentally type when trying to spell "backpedaling" instead. That's the big difference between the two. Now show some gratitude for the correction, so that you don't embarrass yourself to others in the future by making that misspelling.

[@sirbluntalot324]

She must've graduated from Ben Shapiro's speed talking academy

[@DJMarcO138]

Emphasis on the speed. They're legal meth heads. Probably hopped up on adderall or something. They sound like every meth head or coke head who's ever thought that what they have to say means something.

[@sirbluntalot324]

@John Burton I kno that you kno that I kno that IF that wasnt sarcasm that was about as racist as you can get while simultaneously being as ignant as you can get...n you kno I kno you kno you ain't no racist...so ima chalk that up as sarcasm.

[@DJMarcO138]

@John Burton "credit to her race" sounds pretttty fuckin' racist bro, lol.

[@DJMarcO138]

@John Burton there's only one race, you twat...human. And saying "credit to their race", is like saying "they speak well for a _______". It's at best a backhanded compliment, but in reality, just racism.

[@DJMarcO138]

@@KnockManJo speaking super fast and saying absolutely nothing of substance isn't verbal dexterity.

[@jeffreygandara4412]

Sometimes the best answer is “I don’t know”

[@deem10]

Jeffrey Gandara takes humility, she doesn’t have that

[@joelmusso1242]

@@deem10 Agreed. Everyone is an expert about their uneducated views on all things.

[@khazarhay]

not when its global warming, the answer should always be yes there is

[@budgetsneakerhead3291]

Climate change should be discussed between two scientists

[@acohen1980]

How thick are you dweebs?...there is not one iota of credible peer reviewed scientific data which show a connection between global warming & global climate change...NOTHING.....local and regional weather/climate variations ..yes...and that's been known since the mid 19th century......but that has nothing to do with global warming trends......the IPCC are frauds....pathetic, amateur frauds who have stolen billions of research funds from legitimate scientists.....thus the US, China, Russia, Australia et etc will continue to build coal fired power plants cos they have nothing to do with global warming PS: it's the Sun, silly......ha ha ha ha

[@710xela9]

i watched this stoned & it made my high go away

[@TheReal5limeB4by]

Alex Ignacio Jovel 😂😂😂😂

[@alecnolastname4362]

Second.

[@downhilldaddy9346]

Alex Ignacio Jovel yea cause rogan is like an jr. high principal

[@KP-sh9he]

Facts rogan act like you gotta straddle the fence all the time

[@sanpeter3377]

Alex Ignacio Jovel I was gonna watch this while high, saw your comments, now I’m not gonna watc it.

[@PhoenoEnt]

The scary part is 60 percent of Americans will believe her instead of the 97 percent of scientists who actually have grounds to speak on.

[@BIGBLUEGMEN]

The even scarier part, your comments is true regarding most important things. People will listen to the opinion they like versus scientist and subject matter experts.

[@mattc5647]

All contrarian republicans. All our institutions are corrupt, America is collapsing, according to them. So the only people who truly know whats going on are Alex Jones, and facebook memers.

[@safertobeanonymous2224]

@@BIGBLUEGMENworse People now choose the reality they believe to be true Choose what’s true based on what they believe…..

[@JohnSmith-jt3bh]

Yeah just like they listened to Fauci and got the jab to save their lives and not kill grandma

[@TeutonicNordwind]

NO. Scientists who don't buy into the hoax aren't allowed in the club any more, thus sustaining "97% of all scientists support..." (the silly hot) What's scary is people like you

[@dsilva2012]

This is weed arguing with coke.

[@ternell25]

😂😂😂

[@dANNNimal]

Under rated comment.

[@davei2938]

LMFAO

[@mattdrewdrums]

Nah. This is logic arguing with ideological bullshit.

[@jvq9053]

😂

[@Rapture749]

This is exactly the reason why I don't have a political party. You begin to identify with the party and always side with it even on issues in which it's wrong in.

[@jonlosius7939]

You’re doing great. Keep being you, and don’t fall under the tribe mentality curse.

[@corny165]

Never a truer word. Even thoughtful, clearly intelligent members of each group fall into the same trap. Candace said one truism in this clip but the significance was lost on her...at 4:48 she said "instead of looking for what you're searching for why don't you look up what you're not searching for". She's right. You could easily justify the opposite viewpoint of that was your goal and this betrays a real truth. In todays age a layperson can find evidence to corroborate any viewpoint they wish to hold. Confirmation bias and a limitless database of knowledge, opinion, spin, etc make it a simple matter. Did you ever watch a flat Earth video? They pull 'facts' from everywhere. It's almost convincing. Almost!

[@letBIGGIErest]

FACTS

[@vexxvortex1882]

that's not true. That's called identity politics and you shouldn't play that game. They play it a lot in the west but just because someone sides with a party that doesn't mean you believe everything one party does.

[@Burt_Sampson]

I don’t have a political party either but I’d never vote Democrat. I’d rather not vote at all

[@noloveforthehaters]

"Arguing with a smart person is hard. Arguing with a stupid person is impossible"

[@TheAmsmith13]

Don’t argue with a stupid person. They’ll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

[@arthursullivan681]

Absolutely 💯 💯 💯

[@aktharchowdhury9839]

Why do the media give this unqualified dumbass a platform to spout bollocks.

[@Connection-Lost]

@Michael Larkin Joe's level of informed is "It seems like we pollute a lot and that's probably bad". Meanwhile, Candace is trying to point out the FACT that every single climate prediction has been wrong, and in some cases the opposite happens.

[@rm_con]

“Arguing with a genius”

[@shannontreiber1070]

She couldn’t just said “I don’t know.” That’s it.

[@ljdamann54]

-there is no evidence Joe: here is some evidence - I don’t believe you .... Politics

[@chrisordonez9896]

No just Candace

[@destroyermaker]

People

[@lovinmclovin5290]

She's wrong about Global Warming... but her point is she has an opinion and she doesn't know much about it but if someone sits down with her she can change her mind. Nothing wrong with that.

[@ljdamann54]

Lovin McLovin but Joes point is that if you don’t know.. don’t have an opinion... she “claims ignorance” at same time as “it’s a hoax”, those 2 can’t be mutually exclusive ... it’s a problem in political commentary and people in general

[@davidfuller9373]

Tobias..no Candace just makes everyone that's in a debate with her she makes the look dumb lol 😂..

[@DdotRay86]

Candace Owens: "As I travel around the world and see different parts of the country"

[@Bigfoot985]

Lol

[@jackwestcott4469]

She travels the same world where NFL teams are World Champs.

[@thegreywarden9983]

I mean...that isn’t an incorrect sentence. You can travel around the world AND see different parts of the U.S. I don’t agree with her, I’m just saying it’s not a bad sentence technically speaking.

[@KeepSpace.3PL]

Honestly Candice is an idiot

[@Damon1987]

Perhaps the key word here is.... And

[@petebagi]

“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” - ― Daniel Patrick Moynihan

[@ox3505]

Russian Bot8269 but we are making it worse

[@ox3505]

Joe Rogan : Excuse me sir, but I do believe you've dropped your wallet. This chick : Doesn't look familiar to me. Joe Rogan : What? I just saw you drop it. Here. This chick : Nope, it's not mine. Joe Rogan: It is yours. I am trying to be a good person and return it to you. This chick : Return what to who? Joe Rogan : [facepalms, then shows Patrick his ID] Aren't you Patrick Star? This chick : Yup. Joe Rogan : And this is your ID. This chick : Yup. Joe Rogan : I found this ID in this wallet. And if that's the case, this must be your wallet. This chick : That makes sense to me. Joe Rogan : Then take it. This chick : It's not my wallet.

[@EB-du3vh]

O X that is debatable and not proven fact you are aware of that right? The common belief is more co2 equals higher temps which is true but do you know how many factors go into the temperature of the earth ? It’s not just co2 lvls lmao

[@ox3505]

E B I do know my handful share of information about he topic i took a university course on it it’s real man we make it worse

[@ox3505]

Russian Bot8269 because everyone has a car and everyone wants cow meat plus pollution in the ocean ruin coral reefs all of which contribute to the decrease of co2 reduction

[@OlivierGaffuri-wc2dl]

I am embarrassed for Candace. Not her finest hour….

[@Valdemar135]

She never had a even a finest second.

[@supremo7217]

​@@Valdemar135Climate change is real, but not in the way you think it is, we didn't cause it one bit. Our real problem is actually plastic pollution, and the individuals has so little to do with it also, it's the big companies like Coke who throw ot massive amounts of trash in the seas like 70% of trash are from companies alone.

[@lukekubik2277]

⁠​⁠@@supremo7217so youre saying climate change is real and humans are causing it, great input!

[@devantethedcguyreactstoo252]

yeah but this is old and she may know but didnt want explain how she really felt about the topic.

[@dahbajanman7044]

Not here finest hour? What about her saying Europe colonizing Africa was a net positive for Africans?

[@rileyrussell9321]

she literally said "the weather is different today from yesterday" did she not learn in sixth grade the difference between weather and climate 💀

[@lolitah8560]

I almost lost it bawhahahahaha

[@anidynamic]

Welcome to Trumpworld. What happened to intelligent conservatives? These are not conservatives, they are Trumpers.

[@sly6757]

@Real Progressives Allowed exactly

[@lukehumphrey5236]

😭😭😂😂😂

[@charlestremblay9028]

@Real Progressives Allowed even if weather and climate mean the same thing, it’s still really stupid to compare the weather which varies everyday to the climate which is an average of the weather of a region or of a period of time

[@jameshartman3630]

When she said “the weather was different than it was today” that told me she had no idea what climate is

[@danielbaker7213]

So can you explain to me why it went from global cooling, to global warming, then too climate change? Why does the name always change?

[@TheTinyTimmyTimTim]

@@danielbaker7213 Because that's how science works. Once you are confronted with data that changes the reality of what your talking about, the name shifts to more accurately reflect that data. edit: also, if your goal is to convince laymen, people without no scientific background, that this highly complicated issue IS an issue, your going to try to use a name that will translate the best to the common population. Global warming was too inaccurate and reductive and confused the morons who went "OH BUT SOME PLACES ARE COLDER" so they changed it.

[@the_illegitimate_jedi3479]

@@danielbaker7213 THAT'S what your argument is?

[@bboybreezi2417]

@@danielbaker7213 did you skip science class in school 😂

[@kenwie9097]

I remember learning in middle school science class weather is the day to day state of the atmosphere and climate is the long term state. She lost all credibility on the issue when she failed to understand that

[@Welcher7]

YOU DARE QUESTION JAMIES SOURCING SKILLS?!?!

[@Texasmade7739]

chris wells young Jamie checked her quick

[@Downsey1989]

She isn’t smart enough to understand what Joe is saying. Which is clear by her continuing to say “yeah yeah yeah.” And interrupting him!

[@eladc1987]

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein

[@debrahoffman2031]

Einstein was a shill to market on. He even admitted Tesla was smarter.

[@FuturePast2019]

Albert thought the Milky Way was the universe. Human stupidity can be read every day about climate change. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qGrMmKKlgbyheJI

[@lucasloucetios164]

Debra Hoffman ayyyy 🤣🤣🤣 your idiocy is beyond measure innit ? Roger Penrose was just awarded the nobel prize for his mathematical models that prove the existence of black holes as a prediction of Einstein's theory of general relativity. Meanwhile you’re an oxygen thief 🤷

[@jinibeckets9938]

Ooooooh. Einstein.... The guy who was ridiculed by the "scientific consensus" and his "collogues" for his theories and who famously said “Why 100? If I were wrong, one would have been enough." in response to them trying to discredit him even though he was later proven correct?... That guy? So much for consensus and Majority.

[@basedmod2139]

@@darianjohnston1658 what the fuck are you talking about? Have you ever read a single physics paper in your life?

[@LeeKao]

He is so patient, this is almost like therapy.

[@quantumofhate]

I THINK I NEED THERAPY AFTER WATCHING SOME OF THIS......

[@LeeKao]

@@quantumofhate I wish someone in my life would speak to me so patiently about my worst thoughts and ideas

[@troyrichardson6575]

Please tell me you're being sarcastic?

[@aloha_ohana]

@@troyrichardson6575 I hope he is. She was pretty patient putting up with him interrupting her the whole time. What's funny is they both agree for the most part but Joe felt the need to act like there was some conflict to boost ratings, lol

[@nikk2472]

@@aloha_ohana Oh Dave you silly little dolt.

[@justjulian9242]

Joe was low key irritated and I’m all for it 😂

[@rahulmahbubani1392]

Exactly only a fool needs evidence. Why is research so goddamn important can't you just feel how horrible the climate has, I mean it's no brainier

[@xmidgewon736]

I wish I had Joe's patience...

[@stupacx3192]

He keeps it cool though

[@DDogg43777]

rahul mahbubani Climate Change isn't about how you feel climate has been changing, it's more about global changes across larger scales of time. So saying you feel it's gotten hotter isn't a good argument for climate change. Instead, point to all the scientific evidence of climate change.

[@DXDJXD]

Joe was HIGH KEY irritated ahahaha

[@ElHajjMalikElShabbaz]

She said nothing for 20 mins,.... she's gonna be an excellent politician...

[@antoinecharlesdegaulle580]

Lol

[@jenniferlorence185]

She is just like TRUMP. Or imitating Trump.

[@hunali7343]

Because he is forcing the question.

[@antoinecharlesdegaulle580]

@@hunali7343 he is trying to understand why she thinks that way

[@hunali7343]

@@antoinecharlesdegaulle580 she said i haven’t formed opinion and I don’t believe it in. He is like it’s science and stuff she told him she does not have an opinion.

[@remzino9733]

She can’t tell the difference between climate and weather that’s concerning

[@ktpast]

I literally thought the same thing 😂

[@EastlakeRasta7]

image calling winter climate change lmfao

[@heidibutler4662]

HAHA i cackled when she said that. she can’t have an “opinion” on something when she doesn’t know how to define it properly.

[@ewp1]

Very true a basic biology high school class would give the difference between the two.

[@NatsdadsamI]

Neither can scientists apparently. Where did "global warming" go? Climate change is real, the climate changes all the time, that's nothing new. Have a look at pictures of the sky during the industrial revolution, then comment on whether or not you think what we're doing now, has the ability to "bring the sky down" so to speak. Co2 takes up 0.04% of the atmosphere. How can something that occupies that much space in the atmosphere, cause the sky to fall? Millions of people and fish piss in the ocean every day, does that change the flavor of the ocean? No, it does not, because even the fish, of which there are billions, who piss in that ocean every day, is not a large enough part of that ocean to change any aspect of it. Same idea with Co2 and the atmosphere. Search for yourself.

[@shawnh4454]

"I don't believe in global warming" "Based on what?" *shrug*

[@ihatcher]

Based on the fact that we are going through a cooling period for the last 15 years lol

[@shawnh4454]

Lmao.

[@mezzaninex]

A B You probably shouldn't use articles written by Christopher Booker. He believes in intelligent design and denies evolution and he also claims that asbestos and second hand smoke don't increase your risk of developing cancer. He is what you would call, a complete fucking moron.

[@LEDGER0404]

Read above and I have lots more!

[@AwesomeBlackDude]

Who's more corrupt in Congress between the Republicans and the Democrats? " When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations it's so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear is how corrupt the Democrats are. So why don't we break it down by president and the numbers. Obama (D) - 8yrs in office. zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. so the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as "scandal free" they aren't speaking wishfully, they're simply telling the truth. Bush, George W. (R) - 8yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences. Clinton (D) - 8yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. one conviction. one prison sentence. that's right nearly 8yrs of investigations. tens of millions spent and 30yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime. Bush, George H. W. (R) - 4yrs in office. one indictment. one conviction. one prison sentence. Reagan (R) - 8yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences. Carter (D) - 4yrs in office. one indictment. zero convictions and zero prison sentences. Ford (R) - 2 1/2 yrs in office. one indictment and one conviction. one prison sentence. Pardoned Richard Nixon. Nixon (R) - 6yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences. Johnson (D) - 5yrs in office. zero indictments. zero convictions. zero prison sentences. So, let’s see where that leaves us. in the last 53 years Democrats have been in office for 25 of those years while Republicans held it for 28. in their 25yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That's one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership. In the 28yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That's more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren't really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn't found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford. So, those only serve to make Republicans look even worse. With everything going on with Trump and his people right now, it's a safe bet Republicans are gonna be padding their numbers a bit real soon. So let's just go over the numbers one more time shall we. 120 indictments for Republicans. 89 convictions and 34 prison sentences. Those aren't "feelings" or "alternate facts" those are simply the stats by the numbers. Republicans are, and have been for my entire lifetime, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency.

[@brodiegreen]

Good on Joe Rogan for pushing her on her BS

[@aswinprasad1011]

Candace clearly doesn't know anything about climate change. She's too stubborn to admit it

[@Skate2rev]

actually she admits it several times..right there this here video

[@materialqal]

@@Skate2rev but her responses were always I don’t know therefore I don’t believe it to be true when it could’ve just been I don’t know

[@Liza.Wharton]

well, she wouldn't have a career if she admitted to not knowing about anything now would she

[@lilcheo5658]

@@Liza.Wharton yea

[@brianvice1144]

Yup. Another person too proud to say "I Don't Know" She's like "I don't know anything about it but I have a stance on it"

[@shannong014]

Her problem and with many ppl like her is that... she speaks before the other is done speaking. Which means it’s absolutely impossible for her to have listened and retained anything that was said to her. What’s the point in doing an interview if you aren’t going to have a conversation (aka listening/responding; repeat)

[@jororc56]

It also keeps the other person from speaking their point of view.

[@oppie2363]

"Think about who we were in bed with, Saudi Arabia... Trump came in and said NO!" Yeah, this claim didn't age well.

[@Zarrakon]

Horribly.

[@Ragnarok1979]

In bed as far as what? If it's selling arms to Saudi, then it's been done by previous administrations multiple times over the years

[@oppie2363]

LoweRider Her claim is that Hillary Clinton was in bed with the Saudis *and* that Donald Trump changed that. Even supposing that he is doing exactly what past presidents had done*, you need to meet the other half of the claim: how did "Trump came in and said NO" with regard to the Saudis? Saying that he continued with business as usual with the Saudis does not meet that burden. *Ignoring, for example, that past presidents weren't making those sales over the objections of Congress in the wake of one of the most significant international human rights scandal of the past decade. The action is hardly the same when the context changes that much: it's one thing to buy some jewelry from a pawn shop, it's another thing to buy from that same pawn shop 10 minutes after the cops tell you that the pawn broker is a fence for local burglars.

[@AngryVet44]

She obviously ignored the picture of trump holding that light sphere with the king of Saudi Arabia and all the gifts they gave him🙄but she’s a talking head being paid by the Koch Brothers to deny everything true and blame liberals for the world’s woes. www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/world/middleeast/trump-glowing-orb-saudi.html

[@Larrypint]

trump made the biggest weapon deal in the last 20 years with the saudis(most radical islamic country in the world)

[@heckald]

"Bill nye is a science influencer." Says Joe unironically...then years later argues with people with PhDs about the efficacy of vaccines.

[@jonathannorton563]

@heckald The Pfizer trial data says the ARR(Absolute Risk reduction) of their Covid-19 shot was less than 1%. Nobody can question that or has questioned that.

[@NeonRadarMusic]

Ignorance = Not knowing something. Stupidity = Not knowing something and having an ego about it.

[@micahhull5126]

So Joe is stupid!

[@drtimoshea4087]

exactly. like joe's doing here.

[@xxraneenxx3]

@@drtimoshea4087sit down Candace

[@watching1513]

@@drtimoshea4087 the delusion is strong with you, young one 😅

[@robinstheel6884]

@@TNTobin Ignorance is a lack of knowledge or understanding. Deliberate ignorance is a culturally-induced phenomenon, the study of which is called agnotology. "knowing better but doing the wrong thing anyway." Immoral describes people who can differentiate between right and wrong but intentionally do wrong anyway. Irrational would also describe such a behavior.

[@tylerforde87]

I can't even listen to this. How did he sit there for 2+ hours. That martial arts discipline must be something else

[@MaximusTheChosenOne]

Lmao that was funny

[@hepwo91222]

He was being rude to her and condescending. Newsflash, anthropogenic climate change is not a proven scientific fact, its barely a theory.

[@jakjam300]

@@hepwo91222 Newsflash, it was 65 farenheit a few days ago in Antarctica. Newsflash, the UN report *made up of scientists* confirmed that we know that we are accelerating climate change at a dangerous rate. Newsflash, the only people who gain from denying climate change is oil companies who trash the environment.

[@tylerforde87]

@@hepwo91222 I'm on the side of Joe where I don't know enough about it to have an opinion on it. I don't care how many scientists say things or how much evidence they claim to have. I don't know therefore I won't claim to know and I don't care to know. Humans will be killed off but the earth will be just fine. I couldn't literally not care any less.

[@hepwo91222]

@@jakjam300 you have been brainwashed by the MSM and globalist politicians. Anthropogenic climate change is unproven, it fails the scientific method every... single... time. Also the climate models are based on incomplete data due to our inability to predict the movement of water vapor more than a few hours/days. So maybe one day when we can solve Navier-Stokes equations we can predict future climate but as of now, we cannot.

[@TheHotYogini]

As an old Yogi once told me: If someone is actually sleeping you can wake them up, but if someone is pretending to be sleeping you can never wake them up.

[@danielreardon6453]

Just tickle them

[@nataliealvarado9753]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@louiseFISHER-g7t]

Ask Irish people about global warming, they can’t wait for it 😂😂

[@darrenlally9386]

I’m Irish but what do u mean by that

[@Stanley_Baby]

@@MarkStoddard😂

[@Stanley_Baby]

I wish it would hurry up, not that it’s real of course

[@mbn9629]

Bless the patience that Joe Rogan has.

[@bluepearl_22]

If anyone would have the patience for this, it's Joe. Remember, he basically lives with 4 women in his house lol.

[@time4ThePlumber]

30 women wouldnt give me the patience to prepare for this bitch. Big annoyed by her haha

[@CashensPowerwashing]

well said J B

[@peterschmidt644]

What patience? The filthy pervert is trying to convince her of a vile lie, that he, in all his stupidity believes. He's a scumbag, period. Don't tell me you're a moron that believes this rubbish also? LOL You Are, aren't you? LOl LMFAO LOL LOL HAHA JAJA LOL LMAO

[@sandraragle5334]

She’s right, one volcano in one day puts out more carbon than all man made in one year. Also he is twisting words around

[@travisgowen5044]

The fact she can't understand the difference between "I don't believe in it" and "I don't know enough about it" is mind-blowing.

[@mTheoriexboxl]

She is knowing the difference. The facts just dont fit her agenda

[@andreaserik6069]

Rogan is clearly wrong here about The climate change issue and is forcefully argueing with faulty facts. You could say hes bringing forth the globalists agenda. See the respons and links to real scientists about this climate change debate: Hello Andreas! Thank you for your inquiry. This is a curious petition which seems to have been hastily put together and not well vetted. "Mickey Mouse" was one of the signatories. (attached) It has some similarities to a similar petition of some years ago with 15,000 signatories - of which Adolf Hitler had signed. blog.friendsofscience.org/2017/11/20/the-petition-of-more-than-15000-scientists-more-fakenews/ As many commentators have noted, most of the signatories do not work in climate science assessments but rather in fields like biology. While there is a component of climate change impacts on biology inherent in that field of study, climate change is measured on very long time scales of 30, 50, 100 and millennial time scales. We do not have sufficient data to make pronouncements about climate change like those made by this group. William Briggs, statistician, has written a biting critique wmbriggs.com/post/28490/ There is much debate in the climate community - the Spilman Law firm hosted this debate: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqqxdJ9tg9-dl68 We have hosted annual events since our inception, hoping to encourage open, public debate and to inform people of the complexities of climate science. friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=308 Dr. Judith Curry states that climate change is not a clear or present danger. wattsupwiththat.com/2019/07/16/climatologist-dr-judith-curry-climate-change-is-not-a-clear-and-present-danger/ Unfortunately, the media love frightening headlines and many environmental groups drive donations with ever more catastrophic claims. We are in favour of open, civil debate on climate and energy policies and full cost-benefit analysis. A group of international scientists have stated there is no climate emergency. kzbin.info/www/bejne/faG5c3tjfb5ohdk I hope this is helpful information. Best wishes, Michelle Stirling Communications Manager -- Friends of Science Society P.O. Box 23167, Mission P.O. Calgary, Alberta Canada T2S 3B1 Toll-free Telephone: [phone] Web: friendsofscience.org

[@AllThingsFascinate]

@@andreaserik6069 nice propaganda

[@travisgowen5044]

I'm not here to argue climate change. I'm just pointing out how much it says about someone when they would rather have an opinion about something they clearly know very little about, as opposed to having the courage to say they don't know enough about it to form an opinion in the first place. That is our current political landscape in a nutshell.

[@mTheoriexboxl]

@Andreas erik Im german and human made climate change is the consens here. But nice try strange youtube guy

[@stevehardy7584]

There's a word "Fremdschämen" in German. It's a mixture of feeling acute embarrassment and deep shame for another person.

[@Sam-cr5wn]

Steve Hardy literally how I feel Rn 😂

[@kakashisensei8419]

We call it "second hand embarrassment"

[@yobama9890]

@@kakashisensei8419 we call it cringe

[@dannyb20vtec28]

It’s called cringe in america

[@kevinchang5465]

There is a word in Spanish come mierda Google translate for this. Thats whats going on here. GW is real

[@strongstyle6779]

Rogan schooled her. Sometimes saying "I don't know" is the smart answer.

[@essay2426]

Climate , health etc are super politicized! Apologize to the queen

[@strongstyle6779]

@@essay2426 queen of what? Conspiracies and fake news?

[@mr.x6313]

Wrong.

[@Blakey_B]

"the climate changes everyday!" Honey, that's the weather. Not the worldwide climate

[@sitrep2418]

She didnt say that. She said it always changed.

[@johndowns3839]

@@sitrep2418 But how much does she really know about it? She'd be utterly lost two minutes into a climate science examination. You know it and I know it.

[@tln25]

Show me the evidence that humans affect the total temperature of the planet. Oh, and do it without NOAA adjusting data. And go.

[@foxxy2583]

@@tln25 www.ucsusa.org/resources/are-humans-major-cause-global-warming www.eea.europa.eu/themes/climate/faq/how-do-human-activities-contribute-to-climate-change-and-how-do-they-compare-with-natural-influences rses.anu.edu.au/research/research-stories/humans-have-caused-climate-change-180-years www.edf.org/climate/9-ways-we-know-humans-triggered-climate-change And I'm sure, even with all this statistical information and scientific explanations, you will still come up with some bullshit to say it's fake. And if you do, why don't you provide evidence as to why it's not caused by humans.

[@kalminmequel]

@@sitrep2418 correct she didn't say the climate changes everyday - she said the climate always changes. It's not unusual to see mis-quotes. "So what you're saying is.."

[@MadGoat360]

Is everyone allowed to have their own opinions? YES Are everyone's opinions valid? NO

[@slevinchannel7589]

Exacrtly. Hence why i recommend 'Some More News' ( even though this month right now wasnt his Best).

[@erikh1041]

I disagree, everyones opinions are valid, and deserve to be heard, but not all opinions are correct

[@slevinchannel7589]

@@erikh1041 THATS LITERALLY WHAT HE MEANT.

[@erikh1041]

@@slevinchannel7589 whats ur problem? Calm down dude

[@MadGoat360]

@@CrackedConker Who hurt you?

[@richardmg9]

paraphrased: "It's just you and me talking, I wouldn't say that in the public eye" -Candace Owens on literally the most popular podcast on earth

[@Claire90409]

Wow. Her saying we don't need to care about the environment even a little bit, then laughing. She seems so immature and lacking in empathy.

[@leishlam8363]

Bless her heart. Joe has the patience of a Saint.

[@vershawn79]

Leishla M I cussed her out about 1,363,839 times.

[@billybobthornton5144]

He was ready to jump across that table tho..

[@CobosOrale]

She has identity issues please excuse her. Ppl like her help nobody.. annoy the enlightened and mislead the seekers.

[@liecrusher3506]

@@billybobthornton5144 and do WHAT?

[@billybobthornton5144]

liecrusher give a hug and say why are you saying these stupid stupid stupid things.

[@getschwifty7413]

Joe: “you have this opinion with no evidence” Candice: “that’s what a Opinion is” Joe: “or you can do research”

[@callumrock11lol76]

She’s never heard the term “well educated opinion” but then again she probably doesn’t know what educated means

[@Justin33B]

@@callumrock11lol76 education doesn’t mean you’re right. Just like college these days teaches bs 20% of the time.

[@scytheblade7151]

Research.... every right wingers Kryptonite

[@xNazgrel]

Do research never means do and actual scientific research on your own. Now it's time for aliens.👽

[@xNazgrel]

It's proven bro. I am right wing, conservative, anti-communist, anti-sjw, anti-big state and I believe in climate change. It's proven by science. Not flat-earth bs. Serious stuff man. m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/oGfMdmlon9Spg9E 👽

[@durd3nt]

gosh, her ignorance in response to Joe's relentless effort to meet her halfway makes me angry

[@johngalt3118]

That's my problem with these conservative pundits. I start listening to them and their debates (other debates, not this one), and I think "Hey, this is actually a pretty reasonable person. They're making good points." But when you dig deeper into their ideas, you find that their viewpoints are all driven by ideology. They're not actually interested in the truth. They're just professional debaters that sound good talking about conservative viewpoints.

[@edwinrivera6549]

Or maybe we don’t wanna pay into with our taxes? I don’t mind a few cuts to to this money pit. Is it valuable? Sure but not at its current price tag.

[@odosjaka7014]

@Shane Jones No one’s saying it can be stopped overnight, but science overwhelmingly tells us we are partly responsible for the speeding up of the process. Do some research friend

[@TJHooper123]

@Shane Jones So your argument is that because it's such an issue, the effort isn't worth the reward, and we should just carry on about our day? So when you let your house get so messy, I assume you just decide to not clean it anymore.

[@foofyastralpunk5875]

@@johngalt3118 Thank you, so well said. I completely agree.

[@TheDiddler69-U]

This reminds me of the movie: Don’t Look Up.

[@Pow_FIsh]

yeah don't look up was specifically about this. Problem is, Candace is right. Climate Change is nonsense.

[@TeutonicNordwind]

HOW DUMB

[@MountainHobbler]

She flat out admitted she would give two different answers depending on her audience.

[@ahmedcruze3532]

Lmao... Fake person alart, even tho she said she's not fake.

[@feleciajohnson6086]

She has no credibility now.....

[@JBPVFL]

Wait, you can give two different answers, and that could just mean answering differently, not giving opposite answers.

[@kensuke0]

@@JBPVFL Different: not the same as another or each other; unlike in nature, form, or quality.

[@clinch2clench]

That is the oxford definition, the Webster definition would include "partly unlike" either way her answers would not be opposite. Joe was triggered, he started out by attacking her in a passive aggressive manner for saying "like". It lead to profanity during an assault on her intelligence masked behind an example of "what he would say." i agree with her on most subjects but i still can't stand her , Ann coulter or ben Shapiro.

[@slinkoplush3323]

I think Joe disarmed her with his deliberate slow pacing of speech and his tone of voice in this exchange. Candice is used to more confrontational exchanges and I think it threw her off.

[@mrfoodskater]

If you don’t listen to the facts lmfao

[@strafer8764]

I think having to think more deeply about it threw her off

[@mystercraig]

Nice observation 👍🏼

[@slinkoplush3323]

@@mystercraig Cheers bud. I try.

[@yankeedoodledandy11]

He's still wrong though. Climate change has always been. It's not something new.

[@ammanchuhan2391]

She seems like the kinda person I couldn't spend an hour with.

[@keeeiif]

hour?! more like a few minutes

[@ammanchuhan2391]

@@keeeiif I stand corrected

[@HipixOFFICIAL]

Her and Tomi Lahren both.

[@kpllc4209]

Not if she has clothes on.

[@ammanchuhan2391]

@@kpllc4209 yooooo. maybe too far

[@hacccccc978]

9:09 "I dont go to colleges to talk about global warming" No, but you are on a podcast millions people watch. Tf is she saying hahah

[@zeebazil]

You're aware that she didn't come on this podcast to talk about global warming right? Joe asked her a question and she said she doesn't believe it's real. Is she just not supposed to hold an opinion..

[@roryobrien3947]

@@zeebazildid you watch the video at all?

[@zeebazil]

@@roryobrien3947 what's your point?

[@Furious316]

That man’s composure is something to behold

[@alextorres5665]

Of course cancel culture will make you compose.

[@Tommyboy6426]

@@alextorres5665 this was before cancel culture

[@Mageblood]

Tommyboy 6426 nah, #MeToo was a thing before 2017 even

[@thechainsaw1234]

@@alextorres5665 8

[@Rubio_Eric]

@@alextorres5665 weed helps too

[@wizard4203]

Candace: "science has been politicized" Joe "no it hasn't" LOL he had to learn the hard way

[@louiemoreno6358]

Don’t argue with stupid people because they will drag you to their level and beat you with experience. Mark Twain

[@steveharveyhd5289]

It’s difficult to argue with geniuses. But impossible to argue with morons.

[@insanegenius5321]

Which one is the stupid one? I hoping your talking Candace

Insane Genius I can assure you Candace Owens isn’t the idiot here lmao

[@wbucrash6492]

@ you're right it was you

[@louiemoreno6358]

@@insanegenius5321 Candice is the moron who can’t listen to any perspectives besides trumpsters

[@yahyashah8289]

“I don’t want to die on this hill” Proceeds to die on the hill 😂

[@javierharo285]

Bruh 😂😂

[@nyboy76]

So you even know what that means???

[@Dylanbolton69]

Jeremiah Hessian yeah I think he knows what it means

[@goldenheartOh]

Well, Joe kept pushing her back up the hill.

[@hepwo91222]

Candace doesn't make a good argument, but Joe arrogantly saying anthropogenic climate change is scientifically proven is not true.

[@amorgod7776]

You've come a long way Joe Rogan... You've come a long way

[@The_WARDen1591]

Candace Owen's argument at its essence: I did minimal research on a vast topic over the course of ONE night, now I do not believe in this incredibly complex scientific issue as a result of my own scientific ignorance which I admit to having. And though I admit I do not have a scientific background I believe I am intelligent enough to denounce the opinions of thousands of scientists because I did some reading on the topic ONCE.

[@ranjdall]

Lol “I did a deep dive one night”

[@Supertoddy96]

@LeJon Brames it goes both ways between liberals and conservatives, easy example is the BLM movement, "get rid of systemic racism" yes beautiful, but solve it at the root of the problem with low income neighborhoods, not just the racists in power (there will always be racists, thats their beliefs/opinions as long as they don't affect others i dont care) there is more helping minorities than whites plain and simple such as scholarships given to exclusively blacks, thats a racist act, imagine if it was the other way around etc, actions of people 50-100 years ago is not my responsibility, nor anyone alive today who didn't take part in racism because they didn't do it, now do your research on the mission statement on BLM, theyre anti white supremacy, what white supremacist groups are going around terrorizing towns cities etc or stopping minorities from doing anything, none, except maybe the 1-2 rogue evil people who claim to be W/S

[@ianmcintosh8307]

@@Supertoddy96 your comparing someone who doesn't believe in a potentially earth saving idea for almost no reason other than the democrats believe it, with people who want to take up for those who may, and many have been treated unjustly. it seems to me that in both situations the left is like lets help were we can and the rights like fuck it dont bother me none...it was only 60 years ago they were draining pools if a black kid touched the water in it so to believe there isnt ground to gain for equality still(tho its obviously much better) is foolish.

[@focusdecorating3637]

Shes right though. Modern day science is super corrupt. Scientists doing research only get funding for mainstream projects where they funders need to see results to fund their BS agendas. This is true. Look at The Hadron Collider project disaster for one, its proved nothing yet they want to now build a new bigger one.

[@volcryndarkstar]

"I'm not saying this publically, I'm just talking to you." -Candace Owens on one of the most popular podcasts in the world

[@xh0rsex]

@Julie She's not even a bulb. She's like trying to screw a shoe into a light socket...

[@teejay3193]

Her point being is that she is respectfully engaging in the topic at hand because its just the 2 of them talking. As in, she means that she isn't trying to persuade anyone whatsoever during this exchange.. Its obvious only Joe Rogan is trying to do the persuading. @JULIE & JAMES! Are you this ignorant? Bc Joe clearly proves he is the one with the agenda by getting upset that she "as an influencer" is stating she doesn't share the same beliefs as him!!

[@xh0rsex]

@@teejay3193 It may have been just the 2 of them talking, but it wasn't just the 2 of them listening to the conversation, unless she just drew a blank and forgot that their conversation was being recorded on one of the most listened to podcasts...

[@volcryndarkstar]

@@teejay3193 Joe's point is that as an influencer she can't just state her feelings as if they're more important than facts because she has a responsibility as a public figure not to misinform people.

[@MrArtillian]

@@teejay3193 lol, so you disagree with his point that you shouldn't be opinionated on something you know nothing about? yeah he's the bad guy here.

[@s1nski]

She was proven wrong multiple times, she just refuses to change her language which is all JR was really asking. She's just tap dancing and being stubborn

[@nicaee]

It hurts the ego to admit defeat

[@kmankx1592]

Proven wrong when, her point was she doesn't need to have a specific opinion not that global warming was fake. People are so stupid, cant just let people be skeptical smh

[@s1nski]

@@kmankx1592 she does have a specific opinion though, she says that she does not believe in global warming. Which is an opinion, specifically on the truth of the subject... lol

[@kmankx1592]

@@s1nski nothing specific about saying you don't believe in something

[@s1nski]

@@kmankx1592 do you even know what the word "specific" is then? Re-read what I previously replied dude, it's not that hard.

[@jonsmith7504]

Sorry Candace you wrong on this one and you cant just take the L

[@ln812]

This is legit the definition of anti-intellectualism.

[@Silverheart1956]

Dear LN, Which one ? I would say both ! DZ

[@F1fan4eva]

Dn Zach saying I don't know, as Joe does, and looking into it yourself, and forming an opinion based on a high number of professional subject matter experts is anti-intellectualism to you? Our species is fucked!

[@yazzyyazyaz]

Lies through her teeth anytime Joe calls her out. Classic idiot behavior.

[@alowitiousmckay5563]

@@yazzyyazyaz which lies? Be specific, please.

[@Silverheart1956]

Dear@@F1fan4eva, I agree that we should always consider what the experts think; that is certainly a valid consideration. However, science (and truth) is not determined by majority or consensus. (Argumentum ad populum fallacy). We can all think of instances in history, where the consensus was wrong. The "follow the crowd mentality" is not the way to make a decision, particularly when politics is involved, and this has become a political hot topic with millions of dollars of grant money at stake for scientists who work with the politicians. We all agree that scientists are humans beings, subject to many temptations, and we all know how dirty politics is. I think the data is also an important factor to consider, and probably should receive priority over consensus, if there is any question of disagreement. There is also a question of objectivity of the data we do have. If the acquisition of the data has variables and extraneous factors that is not adequately controlled, then the raw data can be misleading and manipulated. There are questions of data manipulation due to the accusations that old data sets do not match the more contemporary "adjusted" data sets. There is also the question of data driven conclusions vs model driven conclusions. Models lose their predictive power as they are projected farther into the future. Consider the predictive power of hurricane projection models, short term vs long term. Climate change has many more extraneous variables than predicting hurricanes. Question: Dear@@F1fan4eva, if the famous "hockey stick graph" of Mann, Bradly and Hughes, is an accurate prediction of the increase of warming, and their graph exhibits a dramatic increase to the end of their graph in the year 2000, then what do you think the graph should be now in 2020 (20 years in the future from the time the graph ended) ? Consider that the graph does support an increase of about 1 degree in since 1900. It would seem that at rate of increase, as shown in the graph, we should have increased in temperature another degree in the last 20 years (to 2020), if that graph is an accurate, predictive model. That is 2 degrees since 1900. Shouldn't a two degree change have dramatic effects ? Many scientist think so (climate.nasa.gov/news/2458/why-a-half-degree-temperature-rise-is-a-big-deal/). Do you think our current data supports this prediction, twenty years later ? If this rate of increase continues to increase "proportionally" according to the prediction of the model, then in the next twenty years there should be an increase of 2 to 3 degrees which perhaps would be devastating. If so, we may only have 20 years left. Is this your assertion ? I see many questions that are unsettled and I am not sure the predictions of the models are completely accurate. I do favor active, open debate on the issue between the scientists of both sides (and those in-between). It does appear the politically correct side is suppressing this kind of open discussion which is a form of anti-intellectualism. I do favor taking precautions and moving on to become more eco-friendly. It certainly won't hurt and can push our technology forward. (Electric cars are cool and faster !). Be well and open-minded. DZ

[@rockyp3917]

Never believe a word from anyone who says "I have read a SHIT TON of articles"

[@ruubs9615]

Or in one night! While it takes scientist their whole life to understand it. This lying fake poser says its not true because she read it one night! Unbelievable

[@rockyp3917]

@@ruubs9615 She thinks that she is the second coming of Einstein 🤣. Joe was very generous in calling her Intelligent.

[@edaboodie6346]

Never use absolutes.

[@NigelGrab]

@@edaboodie6346 that's in itself an absolute haha

[@michaela1843]

Haha

[@gmnboss]

She's just throwing out word salads

[@richardshiflett5181]

She is copying Trump.

[@321cast6]

Try watching this 4 times i bet it makes less sense from her point of view with more replays

[@the_endgame]

@@321cast6 hahahahaha what??? You are out of your mind.

[@Stanley_Baby]

You believe we are causing sea levels to rise 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@CMDNRECORDINGSLTD]

"That one night that I did a deep dive into it" 😂😂😂😂😂😂 I'm sure you did Candace lol

[@EcuChris]

I'm really tired of all these "I'm going to say what I feel and influence a lot of people, but I'm not an expert" types.

[@TheTinyTimmyTimTim]

Thats the entire right wing grift, and the most egregious is Jordan peterson's brand of "I'm going to say things that have an obvious implication, then when you ask me if that's what im implying, im gonna say your putting words in my mouth and lying because lefty's are evil".

[@darioam3329]

@@TheTinyTimmyTimTim Jordan Peterson is completely different from Candace Owens. Unlike most people he has changed the world for the better and he has improved a lot of people’s lives including mine. Is he perfect? No. Are all of his thoughts inherently correct? No. Has he made the world a better place? Yes. Hope you understand where I am coming from. Cheers :)

[@TheTinyTimmyTimTim]

@@darioam3329 Thats fine, and i'd never equate Candace and JLP. Unlike candace, even If I disagree with JLP, i can tell he's an inherently intelligent individual unlike candace who's a talking points machine and is only just clever enough to dress it up as if they aren't talking points and some huge revelation she's "woke" too (ironically enough). Problem with JLP is he steps outside his expertise way too often. Dude has almost no actual political knowledge or analysis, yet almost everything he's done recently in public (his tours, speeches, debates etc) is about american politics that he doesn't understand, as a CANADIAN no less. He speaks in airy homilies, somehow translating an anti-trans language stance into an entire political philosophy and it forces him to embarrass himself in front of guys like zizek because he's now wedded to an awful ideology within a paradigm he doesn't understand.

[@sloklubolisen2577]

@@TheTinyTimmyTimTim He’s never really said anything that’s “anti trans” though. One of the reasons he rose to fame is because Canada wanted a implement a law that forced people to refer to others by their preferred pronouns and he protested that since it’s a huge infringement of free speech. He publicly criticized that and was then labelled transphobic. I’d argue no one can really go out of their “area of expertise” when arguing politics, he just approaches the political issues from the perspective of a clinical psychologist. You could argue that he isn’t well enough informed to speak on specific political issues but I think he does a pretty good job of answering questions by using the knowledge that he actually knows something about. Unlike Candace Owens who seems to just parrot right wing talking points.

[@cgates2]

@@TheTinyTimmyTimTim I don’t think Peterson originally intended on becoming a U.S. politics pundit. I think he got asked what his thoughts were on the topic so many times that he started to FEEL like it fell into his area of expertise.

[@maskedasmr4992]

Her smug answer “not even a little bit” while laughing when asked if she cares about the environment is wild.

[@Durram258]

Because its undeniable that the climate change fanatics have a larger agenda than caring for the climate, given that the people who are loudest about it are the worse individuals for negatively impacting the climate, using private jets, powerful cars, overly large homes which are always heated with lights on even when they arent there. Lets also not forget about the fact that the same billionaire advocates are buying beachfront property in areas which are being said by these lot to be underwater decades from now.

[@maeannengo4908]

@@Durram258 Caring about the environment isn't just about Climate Change. It's also about basic stuff like Pollution and Deforestation.

[@Durram258]

@@maeannengo4908 Yeah very true, and youll never get anyone who thinks theres no problems with deforestation or pollution, resolving those two issues isn't the same as tackling climate change on a larger scale, especially when the apocalypse lot cant even tell us what we have to be so worried about and when they wont challenge china on it, its just a joke, another group of fanatics whining about another issue without presenting very good arguments.

[@maeannengo4908]

@@Durram258 They have been telling us why we have to worry about climate change. Severe storms/hurricanes, severe drought, severe snowstorms, melting land glaciers which causing rising sea levels.

[@Durram258]

@@maeannengo4908 Yeah and yet we haven't seen anything out of the ordinary, and its not like storms are an issues when you can just avoid living in storm hot spots. The rising sea levels clearly isn't an issue given that all the wealthiest people are buying sea front property in the areas they themselves say will be underwater within decades, why are banks and investors also giving loans on these properties, think about it.

[@michaelt8680]

She’s out of her depth here and she’s scared to be wrong.

[@youmadbrah8450]

Nailed it

[@masonm.2618]

Michael T Joe always argues with conservatives on topics they admit they don’t know a lot about, did the same thing with crowder on pot

[@Positiveenergy68]

She’s not wrong. Read this article from 1989, it’s all about the money! apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

[@Michael-vs6nc]

Mason M. Yeah but all she had to say is that she is wrong and you can not make a statement and say you don’t believe in climate change and have blatant disregard for scientific evidence

[@Positiveenergy68]

Kalub Litzinger There isn’t any iron clad scientific evidence. There is more evidence that disproves man made climate change. The climate has been changing for millions of years and in the last 100 years it hasn’t even changed by 1 degree.

[@michaelnorton1140]

She made absolutely 0 points in the full 20 minutes.

[@TakeOneGoodLookAtYourself]

It's not as if you would be able to understand her arguments even if you had listened with full undivided attention anyway.

[@lovelybitofbugle219]

​@TakeOneGoodLookAtYourself She said she doesn't understand the science.

[@saintsoldier530]

“I wouldn’t die on this hill” *dies on hill for 20 minutes*

[@SliceofBread123]

This felt like an hour, not 20 minutes... my god

[@saitohshihomi5649]

m3lon San, What Does Candace Owens_Farmer mean by her statement to Joe Rogan: " I'm Not So Sure, I Would Die on the Hill for It" ? I am so very Sorry, I do not Understand.

[@fartpimpson3843]

@@saitohshihomi5649 the fuck is wrong with you?

[@helenrichards2762]

Yyyeessss that's fucking hilarious!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@digitaldecoy2072]

Not true. Joe is arguing that we must all be scientifically agnostic... She is creating a hypothesis based on data too... This is America and the coversation is more about her belief of disbelief... Joe was so busy trying to convince her to stand on the fence that he didn't bother to take a beat to consider whether or not there may be truth in her Candace's suspicions that climate change has been hijacked by politics and people who can capitalize off of it... Just pause and think about how big the green industry is and how much money and trash is made from it. In NYC there are home owners and landlords who are removing perfectly good fixtures to update to green fixtures... Do you know how much money and garbage (that isn't biodegradable or recyclable) that generates? Candace's reservations are valid. But, instead of examining her point further Joe decides to try dragging her for saying she doesn't believe. Stay on the topic and destroy her argument instead or deflecting and attempting to assassinate her belief, or lack of belief system...

[@davidholle6569]

A device that pulls CO2 out of air .... Tree: " Am I a joke to you ?"

[@Greenthumbn1576]

I tell my fuance this all the time... They cut down millions of trees that will help us to replace it with machines. This shit is idiotic. I believe this is a contributing factor why our earth is caving in. Tree roots are strong and hold so much together. We are parasites to this earth.

[@nbdb23]

Apparently not enough people know about the function of trees, sad

[@GomiBombs]

its literally like the movie idiocracy, everyones like " it got electrolytes thats what trees crave"

[@user-kx7do4fh2j]

@@Greenthumbn1576 and sea

[@gavbrown9808]

Human beings cut down CO2 eating trees to make way for C02 producing humans! 3 billion people on earth till middle of last century. Over population is the reason for climate change

[@HKRalf]

Shes basically sayin "i have my opinion ino im wrong but im keeping it because im too shallow to accept facts".

[@chelecovers6893]

She's paid not to accept the facts. She's a right wing grifter.

[@j_f82]

Lots of people do the same shit lol

[@sinbadsailor1963]

The so-called facts from the global warming doomsday cult is data that was fraudulently “adjusted” to prove their case. The 1930’s was always the warmest decade in recorded history until the temperatures were adjusted downward by the cult.

[@lorenclark9267]

She's a brainwashed shill who profits from spreading this nonsense.

[@sinbadsailor1963]

Tol, R. S. J. (2014). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A re-analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 701-705. doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.045

[@anthonymiller9961]

This is one of the wildest back and forths

[@SwainerGamer]

She clearly doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate and its hillarious

[@hepwo91222]

Whats hilarious is how Rogan believes in this so passionately. C02 is still a whopping 0.04% of the atmosphere, but yeah, its going to cause the apocalypse, its laughable.

[@bobbobson9952]

@@hepwo91222 What's hilarious is your reasoning, oh it's only 0.04%, it can't be dangerous. How about you try to research the effects of even extremely small overdoses and/or on environmental scale instead of living in your small minded echochamber.

[@hepwo91222]

@@bobbobson9952 small minded echo chamber? Climate scientists have to prove global warming is happening with evidence. I can debunk the feeble "science" with a few points, climate models are all worthless due to our inability to solve Navier-Stokes equations, climate has always changed before man was here and will after, and C02 levels are still extremely low at 00.04%, not significant.

[@hepwo91222]

@@EventualWarlord climate changed more strongly before man. The miniscule 00.04% C02 is still insignificant, anthropogenic climate change is about as impactful as the individual investor buying 1 share of Apple would be to the stock market, has virtually little to no impact.

[@JohnSmith-gv2os]

hepwo91222 science’s job is never to prove anything. It’s responsible for the gathering of data, experimenting, and coming up with hypothesis’ and theories based on these experiments. Science is however used to disprove other established hypothesis’ and theories for which there has never been any scientist thats ever disproved climate change.

[@Will1SAG]

"Theres a big difference between measuring Co2 levels in the atmosphere and deciding whether theres an after life" - Nice work Joe 15:22

[@DaveBooda]

Candance: "You and I are having a conversation 1-on-1" KZbin: 3.9M views

[@godsgreatestwarrior]

Can'tdance

[@ramelep]

She exposed herself when she said : I look up the other side. This is the VERY thing she doesn’t do. And when she does She only does it to Debate. To pivot and come across Intellectually sound.

[@Classified141]

"I'm open to learning!" (presents evidence) "I just like don't believe that"

[@asevarasto]

I've been thinking, how can so many scientist be so sure about human based climate change? We have gathered less than 200y data from the climate and earth's co2 levels? I mean the universe is 14billion years old, even earth is 4,5billion years old. Sure they have drilled samples from antarctic, but remember that some documentary that had some specialist explaining and showing that drill sample how our climate has always had differences and co2 levels follow earth's climate with 300-500y delay. And for that political side, is human really the main cause? co2 is natural gas so it shows up everywhere so i guess it is easy to blame and gather money from the people because we emit lots of co2 with our everyday lives. I think we don't have enough data from human based co2 emissions to climate change to prove that. There are also lots of natural things that happen in the core of our planet, seas and space that might also cause differences in our climate and emit co2, if it causes climate change. Human industrial era has just started compared to how old earth is. Can it really have that fast impact? I'm not anymore so sure about this whole argument so can anyone enlighten me?

[@the_endgame]

@@asevarasto the Antartic ice cores can be dated to millions of years old. We have been in the Holocene period which has been one of the most stable and confortable tempature periods in human history (200,000+ years). Our Carbon is altering the atmosphere to change the temperature just enough to raise the oceans to wipe out almost 90% of coastal settlement. Most populations are on the coast. The planet will be fine in the long run, but contributing to climate change with CO2 is a threat to our civilization. Not to mention all the other damage we are doing to earth's ecosystems and niche biomes. Most large mammals will go extinct because of us, maybe in 100 years max. Here is the UN website which has links to papers and conferences. You can research individual scientists and programs, as well as how they are funded with this knowledge. unstats.un.org/unsd/envstats/climatechange.cshtml

[@bonesix]

he did't present evidence ;-)

[@kanyesassistant]

its yeshau not jesus they didn’t get to be able to because this stupid repuplitard can’t understand that if she doesn’t know something, she should say she doesn’t know. How can you talk about the science and say you’re open to learning but argue against all the actual evidence available

[@henrywolf8618]

Will never show my name, KZbin, just stop. Science isn't a dogma...the "facts" of science are the current most factual view of the world. Note *current*...further research could always tip our view of the nature of reality

[@ginorako2176]

Albert Einstein: “The Difference Between Stupidity and Genius Is That Genius Has Its Limits”

[@joewilliams5278]

There is a limit to stupidity. Its called death.

[@sheikmutanabi3003]

That’s not the limit to stupidity, that’s the limit of everything

[@joewilliams5278]

@@sheikmutanabi3003i feel as tho stupidity would be included in "everything"...

[@overprime3978]

Derrick Henry why are you trying to sound smart when you know what he’s getting at. Who are u tryna impress lmao

[@falsofacu]

This is a fake quote, he never said this.

[@solitario7713]

Why not just be smart and take care of the place we live in?

[@M3LLY999]

emanuel rodriguez being smart isn’t the wave🤷🏾‍♂️🤷🏾‍♂️

[@solitario7713]

@@M3LLY999 true

[@marukochan13]

We have one earth after all.

[@georgeaguilar3414]

emanuel rodriguez she kinda said something along the lines of that with the recycling or whatever

[@Andrew-1974]

emanuel rodriguez.... too much money to be made by fucking the earth, its that simple

[@MrJedabak]

Joe: “Global warming is real. Climate change is real.” Candace: “Yeah, the climate changes. It was a different weather yesterday than it was today”. Oh my god.

[@yorkieluv3708]

"The climate changes. It was different weather yesterday than it was today." LOLOL

[@michaela1843]

I don’t many conservatives that like her a few people prop her because she’s an “empowered woman” but her ignorance is incredible

[@yorkieluv3708]

@@michaela1843 I really don’t get it. And she’s been on Twitter since the election telling lie after lie and supporting the accusations that the election was rigged.

[@darealfabio4]

that line there was when I walked away...........she needs to slow it down, and think before speaking

[@danembo7362]

“I read a lot about it”

[@BingeThinker1814]

@@michaela1843 She also gets propped up because she's a person of colour promoting conservative viewpoints. She's a grifter who has to stay on character at all times. Who knows what she believes behind closed doors, tbh

[@yanyeniffer8217]

when she says "shit ton of articles" she means facebook memes

[@robertodegolladojr992]

😂

[@zacharychilcott7119]

@Anstapa Solivagus right

[@shredvansshredquarters]

@Anstapa Solivagus absolutely right

[@theinternetisconfusing5438]

wrong. theyre from Twitter

[@nottootrashy3492]

Usually when people say that and say that they don't remember the statistics, it means they didn't read about it at all

[@wonderboi9415]

Joe: You're wrong Candice: right, yeah

[@Ivan5642]

Basically, it's no surprise to me anymore that most people are dumb as rocks..

[@picallo1]

@Alexis S She's allowed to have an opinion. I love Joe, but she's entitled to her own personal opinion. Like she said, she doesnt preach it, she doesnt give talks about it and she's not spreading it so whats the problem with her having her own beliefs??? I have mine, you have yours etc.

[@j-pvezeau5797]

Stan what's your opinion about dark matter and the Higgs Boson?

[@picallo1]

@@j-pvezeau5797 Well considering the Higgs Boson helps explain how to obtain dark matter I think its pretty fascinating. But its just theory. Lets see how it pans out. And thanks for helping me prove my point entirely. People can have an opinion while having very limited knowledge on a topic. Thats why its opinion.

[@larryhackleman2093]

@Alexis S your attitude towards Candice shows clearly you don't believe she should have an opinion. Get real before you reply.

[@captnfloyd]

Candace is always correct. Just accept this fact already.

[@stephanien463]

“I don’t have an opinion on it.” LITERALLY NEXT SENTENCE “I don’t believe in it”

[@Power_Cosmic27]

She was a liberal 3 years ago. She's still in her conservative honeymoon phase, and is paid handsomely to support those views. I doubt she will hold the same views once they find a better shill with a larger reach.

[@gamerdude1246]

@@Power_Cosmic27 Like Lauren Southern

[@kevinfryar2120]

Its comical! Do you believe in gravity? Science doesn't need your faith.

[@nemo2341000]

She's also stated that this isn't a point she's put much research into. I don't think it's fair to call her dumb because she doesn't know much about an issue she hasn't researched much yet. But then has much more informed decisions on a bunch of other topics. So because she doesn't know much about one given topic she stated she hasn't put much research into, she's stupid altogether? I think that's a little unfair of a statement to make. Dumb on this topic, sure. Or at least hasn't really formulated her thoughts about it yet I think the way that you attempt to measure intellect, is dumb in and of itself. It's been 2 years, I'm sure she's had time to formulate her thoughts about the issue. Also if you actually listened to her argument, she stated the does believe in climate change, just not to the extent others do. For instance, I believe the climate changes all the time, I just don't think Humans have much effect on it. I do know we have a certain degree of effect on it, but how much? All of it? Some of it? How much do Humans actually contribute to Climate Change? What can Humans do to stop it? I don't think there's much the U.S. can do to stop Climate change, at least the technology just isn't their yet. Are renewable methods just aren't cost effective enough and aren't that great compared to fossil fuels. Now there is nuclear energy which burn a lot cleaner, but for some reason many don't want to go that route. It would be cost effective, clean, and a better power source. Even if we went back to the stone ages and completely replaced are energy with crappy alternatives that cost more but are cleaner, We still don't know if that would make any significant effect on climate change what so ever. China will continue what they're doing, other impoverished country's will continue to do what they're doing because environmentalism is a luxury of the rich. Those country's could not afford (Neither can we) to change all of are energy sources for crappier alternatives that cost much more and require more maintenance. If some poor family in Zimbabwe have to burn couch chips to keep their family warm, they're going to do it. Regardless if it raises carbon emissions by 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002% in the future. Also, carbon emissions aren't necessarily bad for the planet either and have been around since the earth has been. It has been aiding in plant growth. After multiple studies done, the research shows that Carbon dioxide actually help with plant growth by aiding the photosynthesis process. Carbon Dioxide is actually essential for keeping earth Habitable, But it is a balancing act. Too little and the earth becomes below freezing, too much and the earths temperature can begin to rise. What I generally don't agree with people on is the extent of which we effect it, and the solution for attempting to keep it balanced. I don't believe the technology is quite there yet for us to make much of a change on it as of yet. But there are also many other green house gases that seem to cause this effect as-well such as methane, Chlorofluorocarbons, and nitrous oxide. Also, the changing of the greenhouses effects are hard to predict. So anyone telling you the world is going to end in 2021, is probably an idiot. I don't believe the world is ending any time soon due to this, and I believe the best solution currently is to wait for better technology to become available. I believe there are currently far more pressing concerns than climate change.

[@nemo2341000]

@@Power_Cosmic27 You got all that off of a 20 minute clip?

[@Gaucho215]

“Why have an opinion on something you have no data about? “ This question should be at the center of any discussion.

[@deusmuerte6832]

Another good question, a you sure your opinion is made on correct information?

[@Yodontdoit]

She did fucking say she didn’t know enough nd Joe kept pushing

[@OneTheBlue]

That's because she continues to express strong opinions on this topic about which she is ignorant. @@Yodontdoit

[@OneTheBlue]

Yes, it is correct to say that one cannot discuss a topic without relevant data. I don't believe you can find an example of someone expressing a meaningful opinion on a topic about which they possess no information. @@deusmuerte6832

[@Yodontdoit]

@@OneTheBlue well Joe has since changed his stance on climate change to something similar to hers sooo

[@Halfandhalf32536]

Claims she's open to learning yet dismisses every fact that is presented to her, makes sense

[@strafer8764]

@Jay Young doesn’t a fact have to be proven for it to be considered a fact by definition?

[@Tbonethe1nfinite]

@@strafer8764 Yeah but what qualifies as proof? Mainstream science has been bought and paid for. You simply can’t trust mainstream science that’s funded and controlled by rich people who sinister agendas, and that’s what most people simply can’t understand. Just because something has been “scientifically proven”does not make it true. Statistics can be deceptive, data can be manipulated. Information can be illusory. All warfare is based on deception, magicians use these simple tricks all the time, sleight of hand, etc. It’s closed-minded people in this comment section who can’t grasp why other people don’t share their perspectives. It takes a stunning amount of arrogance to assume that other people have to believe what you believe just because it’s the “scientific consensus” and not even stop to consider that maybe people have good reasons to distrust mainstream media and mainstream science. It’s like these people don’t understand what lies and corruption are, and assume that mainstream science is somehow pure innocence and uncorrupted in any way.

[@Tbonethe1nfinite]

@@ijustifymylies What a stupid thing to say. bRo ChIlL oN tHe WeEd. EvErYtHiNg IsN't A cOnSpIrAcY bRo. Do you even have any idea how stupid you sound?

[@ayoiawe]

@@Tbonethe1nfinite Your logic is used by vaccines truther, flat earthers. That's not the fault of mainstream science. Yes most things are paid for, most research have an agenda. But with all of that, it is a cop out for many people who want to become selective with how they interpret science. Science is not about proving something is right but proving something is false. The one that cant be proven false becomes scientific theory or what people call scientific fact. As of now, no one has been able to disapprove that climate change doesn't exist. The argument shouldn't even be if its real or not. I expected the disagreements to be how bad the effects are. And even if its just a natural thing. We sure shouldn't be adding to the problem by polluting the atmosphere, the water, killing ecosystems by cutting down trees without replacing them all just to satisfy our never ending needs.

[@Tbonethe1nfinite]

Welcome to reality. The government and mainstream media are in bed together and push retarded agendas like mass-vaccination. I don't get sick, I don't need vaccines. I don't eat dead tortured animals; I fast, drink water, and eat organic fruits and vegetables. Your ignorance and disease are of no concern to me. Freedom and truth are what concerns me, the two things the government tries to bury underneath a pile of bullshit which they call "facts". Be your own scientist; stop eating dead shit filthy animals burned to a crisp in a frying pan like an idiot, fast like Jesus did for a few days, watch your body heal itself. Drink organic green smoothies. Watch how your body no longer catches invisible viruses. Educate yourself.

[@christiannoriega428]

I think what happened here is that Joe was trying to discover why she pushes for or against certain changes that include climate change, but she didn't pick up what he was really asking. I think her reasoning is that she is looking at different motivations and causes that come from the people that push to help climate change. She's likely looking at a whole different perspective on why these policies are pushed. It's not necessarily about if it helps the environment or not. Joe is just confused on where her stance is and what she is trying to accomplish and he thinks it's based on climate change itself. That's also why she is confused on what he was trying to get from her. If he got across that he was trying to find her reasoning and motivation for what she does, then they would have gotten further in the conversation.

[@dogol284]

This should be a textbook example of Confirmation Bias She asks Jamie to search for what confirms her point of view. That’s the reason people like flat-eathers and global warming deniers exist.

[@codmott286]

well it sounded like she said to search for things to contradict your own point of view, which is smart. Problem is the only view she is interested in contradicting is yours, not her own.

[@VasileSurdu]

She had a point though, I mean if they would pull off and sites that contradict Joe's beliefs then it would help the conversation

[@codmott286]

@@VasileSurdu It would have been disingenuous though. She would have said "see! see!! There's a dispute!" and then completely tuned out everything when he went back towards pro-climate articles.

[@mlm82]

well this confirmation bias also applies to the climate alarmists. They have no clue... But climate will magically be fixed by adding an ever increasing amount of communism.

[@codmott286]

@M B G Global Warming absolutely happens and is the biggest risk, however you idiots would go bezerk any time it was cold during a historically warm day and say "SeE, sO MuCh FoR gLoBaL wArMiNg!!" so we had to make sure you numbskulls understood that it is indeed overall CLIMATE CHANGE, but the heat is going to be the killer.

[@horatiohuskisson5471]

He should’ve said to her “facts don’t care about your feelings”

[@NYRCH1926]

Funny, if the right did that the left would cry 24/7 even more than they already do.

[@user-dt3kf2iw8i]

@MetalAficianado Pretty ironic, it must be opposite day.

[@manofmeidan347]

@@user-dt3kf2iw8i Same party that doesn't believe in science!

[@Tony-qt4zv]

​@@manofmeidan347 yet the left that screams defund the police but give them more training? riot for "equal" rights yet buys products from and supports china? wants to vote for a man who will die, then have a woman who jails people for smoking weed but smokes weed herself? Which party is more hypocritical and loony?

[@horatiohuskisson5471]

Tony you have no idea what you’re talking about, I bet you think Ben Shapiro is the leading intellectual philosopher of the day. Defunding the police means that we can reverse the militarisation of the police that happened when most US forces returned from Iraq and Afghanistan and needed to sell their equipment. Now we has small town police forces with SWAT teams and armour trucks. In every major city, the police budget dwarves every other area, if some money was spend on impoverished communities rather than the occupying army that is the police force today then perhaps crime would lower.

[@Liam-uh3pr]

“This wouldn’t be the hill I die on” *Proceeds to die on hill

[@saitohshihomi5649]

Ahoy and Aloha, I am so very Sorry I Do Not Understand What is The Hill, Where is The Hill that WE Are Not Going to Die On? Please Clarify my ignorance!?

[@Liam-uh3pr]

@@saitohshihomi5649 she says she doesn’t believe despite knowing absolutely nothing about it. That’s the hill and joe Rogan was the one to finish her.

[@Jianju69]

@@Liam-uh3pr How exactly did he "defeat" her? By claiming that 97% of scientists believe in human-caused climate change?

[@sownheard]

@@Jianju69 by confronting her on the topic and instead of just letting it go she continues to defend her position fully aware that she knows without the knowledge. She is a drifter she spins the points To confuse the viewer fully aware of the fact that she is just trying to score political points.

[@bcallahan4673]

@@Liam-uh3pr that's half true. analyze the video and what was said. she claimed to be of the opinion that global warming wasn't a concern to her in the context of being in an international agreement where trillions were involved. joe Rogan then said, why have a belief on something you know nothing about. the difference in the understanding is the word opinion and belief, they are not the same but are used similarly to literally and figuratively.

[@JWhite9723]

Candice- “I don’t know about this topic” Literally has evidence helping her with the topic Candice- “ yeah I don’t believe it” GENIUS GUYS 🤣🤦‍♂️🤣

[@harrypeterson9287]

Evidence? Wasn't Florida supposed to be swallowed by the rising ocean years ago according to the science and evidence? The ocean hasn't gone up even an inch since this calculated hysteria began. Funny how not even a single ocean front property in Florida has been affected.

[@tomchilds9385]

Bruh she just said the weather is different every day when talking about climate change I can’t even...

[@mrwoody1413]

@Gerardo Argueta some people get it! Most people just believe what they hear on mainstream media. Of course the climate is changing and yeah, humans contribute a SMALL part of that but these people don’t understand that around 95% plus of the climate change is due to the sun but whatever..

[@dylanabela4058]

@Gerardo Argueta Wrong. 417 ppm is likely the highest it has ever been in the history of humans on Earth. On top of that, it is likely the highest concentration seen on Earth. The last time the atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high, sea level was 50 to 80 feet higher than it is today and 3.6°-5.4°F warmer than pre-industrial temperatures. There is a delay in the physical response of a forced increase in carbon dioxide to temperature and sea level, meaning this acts as a benchmark for where we are likely headed into the future.

[@Mighty67Thor]

Its climate change deniers best argument 💀💀💀

[@rafcam819]

I started laughing out loud💀

[@chesuschrust4776]

@@mrwoody1413 Lmao fucking smooth brain

[@JoeRabone]

Her logic is “I don’t know wether or not you own a dog, therefore I believe you don’t own a dog”

[@serclintalot4497]

Is that what she said? Pretty sure her wording would've been "I don't believe you own a dog." Literally speaking there's a difference between "I don't believe you own a dog" and "I believe you don't own a dog", even though we interpret them the same. "I don't believe" means you have no belief either way (you don't know), "I believe you don't" means you believe the contrary. For some reason all of us interpret them the same way. I never considered the difference until she pointed out they may have a difference in linguistics. Either way she definitely should've said "I don't know" to be clear.

[@Detrahere]

More like "I don't know whether you have a dog or not, BUT, there's a dog house in your front yard, there's some dog toys and chewed up rags lying around, there's some dog shit in your backyard, the cats stay the fuck away from your house, oh and I hear some barking coming from your house. Hmmm, nope I don't buy it. You don't have a doggo."

[@sub-zero5433]

she only exists so that the right can point to her and say “seeeee? our policies aren’t racist. a black person supports them!!” a sad existence, indeed

[@sub-zero5433]

@@serclintalot4497 dude the entire video she’s like “I don’t know anything about this, but here’s my detailed opinion. very obviously trying to push the right’s climate science denial propaganda while also giving herself an out if she’s ever called out about this video

[@serclintalot4497]

@@sub-zero5433 The video only exists because he interpreted "I don't believe" to mean "I vehemently oppose" and decided to grill her on it. Yes, she should have just said "I don't know" but she tried to end it several times, he got more aggressive, and she got defensive. Regardless, what does it matter at this point? It's not like the left has any viable solutions other than griping about it and pointing fingers at the other side.

[@sethkohn5517]

Jesus lady, I'm a conservative, and I would always listen to the data before I dismiss something.

[@DeegTobias]

She is plain arrogant and opinionated while being absolutley clueless.

[@TeutonicNordwind]

And you are brainwashed