My Psychiatrist said that she went form ZERO cases where kids thought they were meant to be the opposite sex to 8/10 children she sees. We are putting this in our kids heads. These are things that should be dealt with organically
@HelenaOlivier-l4q5 ай бұрын
Strange thing, Jessica - I am a white South African, and honestly the only places here where this is becoming prevalent, is in Liberal white communities. Most black people would think you are crazy if you mention such a thing. It is interesting how Africans are liberal/leftist when it comes to economics, but extremely conservative on topics such as family.
@PickupsAreNotTrucks5 ай бұрын
It’s sick. Our kids are being brainwashed by a communist party in the US. I live in ND which is super red and I also live out in the boonies and there’s a kid in our children’s small school that claims to be “trans.” This nonsense has spread everywhere. I don’t care what anyone does as an adult but, I draw a line at kids and I cannot believe we are not all in agreement on this.
@keinegotter5735 ай бұрын
My therapist said the same. 100% social contagion.
@cuppycakey50135 ай бұрын
That’s terrible but not surprising. It’s all about attention now. Btw, WE aren’t doing this, THEY are.
@sue83445 ай бұрын
Becky Weiss did a great video on IG where she says if she was a few years younger she might have gotten sucked into the trans ideology . She’s always been a tomboy and if someone had said to her ‘you’re really a boy’ at a vulnerable time in her development , she might have believed it. It’s so unfortunate that young girls are now questioning their gender just because they don’t fit into the stereotype of Barbie loving girls.
@DougWilkerson-uy1mh5 ай бұрын
This is why Joe is the king. They agree for 70% of the interview and disagree on 30% yet the conversation goes on. People get to listen and decide for themselves.
@humantwotwentyone6414 ай бұрын
And Matt bruh.
@kyrrilcrepeele13534 ай бұрын
They were really dancing around the conversation. Matt's position was marriage is a religious union to create offspring and people who want to be together and 1 arent man and woman or/and 2 dont want kids can have that same legal union without calling it marriage. Law stole the name marriage.
@New_Age_Drifter4 ай бұрын
Did you check the video after the 2 hour mark? Joe spends a good half hour building a straw man on Matt Walsh's conservative view on marriage vs gay marriage. It's pathetic. Joe can't argue for shit without relying on logical fallacies or exceptional hypotheticals for a general argument; it's like listening to a 90s teenager point of view. I don't think Joe has challenged his views since then, it's embarrassing to hear a grown man like him argue purely from emotional outrage. Dude is a Karen for any liberal views he holds.
@pablohiteshew24574 ай бұрын
Matt kicked his ass.
@MercuryRisingFast4 ай бұрын
meh... he kept cutting off Matt. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Gay marriage isn't marriage. It's something else, but it's not marriage. What does the state have to do with marriage at all?? Does it make you more in love? What rights? No one is stopping gay people from doing anything. We just don't care.
@ThinkTink215 ай бұрын
Please Matt, we need a sequel "What is a baby?"
@kookpatrol74905 ай бұрын
Yes!
@thinkitthrough35 ай бұрын
Cool. Let’s test that. What’s a baby?
@roadkingthor84215 ай бұрын
@@thinkitthrough3 Human offspring.
@Consconservative5 ай бұрын
@@thinkitthrough3 a baby is a stage of animal development in which the animal is highly dependent upon its parent or parents for survival.
@jaydonaldson34105 ай бұрын
@@Consconservative so a baby puppy?
@amykopsala68763 ай бұрын
Thank goodness for Matt Walsh! Thank you Joe for interviewing him!
@annoythedonkey5 ай бұрын
I was put on lupron as a kid for precocious puberty, I’m fighting my second rare cancer diagnosis in the last 16 years. I’m not likely to survive this time around and partly blame the lupron for my current situation. I really wish I could scream it from the rooftops and talk to people about this risk, I vividly remember how that drug made me feel, it made me feel so terrible both physically and emotionally. Please if you are a parent who has a kid who’s transgender and is considering “treatment” I beg you to consider what the drug can do to your child in the future.
@curlsncoilsnwaves73245 ай бұрын
Interesting, this is why we won't treat our daughter with medication for precocious puberty. I'm so sorry for your experience!
@OwenHarris-dq6pw4 ай бұрын
You will make it! God bless you for telling your story!
@sabiaottley53184 ай бұрын
I think gender is targeted because there’s an attack on the nuclear family.
@loormaria4 ай бұрын
I pray you will beat the cancer this time around. God bless you abundantly!
@sr.bootsnpants6644 ай бұрын
I'm sorry you went through this. I hope you can stay longer to warn others. Thank you for your sentiments..
@davidcartwright30974 ай бұрын
To think there are people in this world who would argue that an 18 year old didn't understand student loans and can't possibly be trusted with a beer, but a 5 year old can determine their gender.
@Aireck1744 ай бұрын
I think this is all working up to democrats arguing 5 year olds should be able to vote.
@robertpirtle76424 ай бұрын
My personal opinion is that it's a cult of people who have been brainwashed by pedophiles and other kinds of sexual predators. I believe it's people doing the devil's work intentionally or unintentionally, either way it's evil. They've taken advantage of weak-minded people and it slowly affected the intelligent ones over a few decades until this point. There's a lot more I'd like to say about it but I don't want to make too long of a comment. Again it's just my personal opinion.
@unclemikescomedy4 ай бұрын
I feel less uncomfortable hearing that a child is being put on medication or is smoking cigarettes than I do about a child choosing their gender through medical intervention.
@taylorrichard37704 ай бұрын
@@unclemikescomedy You're an abomination. Or, you're just a comedian, per your handle.
@ZacharyMoore-ij6fg4 ай бұрын
Exactly bro, WOKE America is out of control.
@MiindGames5 ай бұрын
Matt exposing this issue absolutely helped me snap out of the Bay Area/LA liberal brainwashing. I came back to Conservatism thanks to this nonsense. God bless.
@crunchywashere35135 ай бұрын
The very god you can't prove exist and has these views, sure buddy
@tippsish5 ай бұрын
@crunchywashere3513 It's basic English terminology. It's basic biology. It has nothing to do with religion. Nice try though
@crunchywashere35135 ай бұрын
@@tippsish Well, if it was that simple, why would gay people exiat ? Let alone trans ans everything that is "abnormal" ? And the fact that they exist is fine by me, and not by Matt. Why ? Because of the Bible
@knowthycell5 ай бұрын
@@crunchywashere3513you can’t disprove it. But It can be proven that a person with certain chromosomes is a man.
@rt191875 ай бұрын
Respect.
@larissag22185 күн бұрын
I’m a nurse practitioner student who unfortunately chose a university cleverly disguised as a university. Unbeknownst to me my second semester in, my professors remove the masks and every piece of teaching, case study, simulated Patient interaction, even exams, are trans/NB based. I just wanna get through the $75,000 program so I keep my head down, but even if you APPEAR to look like you’re not following this, the professors will bully you. I’m close to a straight a student with 28 years of medical experience under my belt and I have never seen anything like it. We’re not learning end of life care, bariatrics, oncology, cardiovascular care. We are only learning about transgender and non-binary healthcare. I’m glad you guys had a deep dive into this issue because it’s gotten so out of hand.
@clownfishcanjuggle5 ай бұрын
They need to redo this interview in the current political climate. It has only gotten crazier.
@nifftycat5 ай бұрын
Totally!
@charaznable80725 ай бұрын
What is a Banana?
@brettmuir56795 ай бұрын
Obama Identifies as a black man even though he is half white. Who says you cannot self identify your race? Rachel Dolezal got beef for it and she had to be cancelled
@brettmuir56795 ай бұрын
Isn't this episode 11 days old?
@clownfishcanjuggle5 ай бұрын
@@brettmuir5679 na, it is an old one uploaded to the library. Look at the show number versus his current show number.
@bobbrown2005 ай бұрын
I think joe is speaking about individual people. Matt is speaking for the society as a whole. Individuals are allow to not have children. But for society not having children is a detriment to society.
@mgband5 ай бұрын
Some would argue that having fewer children would actually be better for society as a whole.
@casmatori5 ай бұрын
@@mgband Well no, because that is slowly eliminating the society.
@Nathanaelelliott5 ай бұрын
We actually need to start having more kids otherwise our societies are going to collapse. Replacement rate has went down all over the world and some think part of the open border crap is to ensure we still hit replacement rate but idk it seems like a lot more than that.
@gorgo49105 ай бұрын
@@mgbandyeah Japan is doing great…
@theantitheist15 ай бұрын
@casmatori it's what we need. This is why we are fighting for resources, why there's so much crime, and so on. To many people to keep any type of control of.
@joefrank34395 ай бұрын
I don’t agree with Walsh in all subjects, but he is a great man fighting for a great cause! He speaks for all the people who can’t for fear of losing one’s livelihood
@lisareiter53685 ай бұрын
Matt is pretty smart on most topics…except for saying fat people are gluttons and food can’t be addictive. I have seen too many KZbin videos of people who lost weight once they gave up carbs.
@doid43544 ай бұрын
@@lisareiter5368 well fat people a lot of the time are gluttons. if people are able to stop at some point then it means it's a choice
@sethflix3 ай бұрын
People in fear of losing their livelihood should surrender ALL over to God's will, and serve God by speaking their heart and conscience despite the consequences. Damn the consequences! Full steam ahead!
@Prince_SheogorathАй бұрын
Matt Walsh is still a circumcising genital mutilator of baby boys that doesn't think that men should have autonomy over their own so-called "PRIVATE" parts. He's an ass. An immoral one at that.
@axegrinder8917 күн бұрын
@@lisareiter5368he’s never said food isn’t addictive he just thinks people try and use too many excuses
@jayhalley26423 ай бұрын
Walsh and Rogan together impossible to get better. Two of the best.
@Nothingmakessense19823 ай бұрын
I love they both have morals and stick w what they believe even if the other disagrees
@joshuawells18084 ай бұрын
I like both of these guys. And I enjoy how they don’t get super emotional, or enraged. It’s more focused and thought out.
@ancientnpc3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for this. One thing Matt hinted at but did not expand on is that one of the motivators for the people behind this is "age of consent". Once you lower the age of consent for something as major as genital surgery, you open the age of consent for everything related. This is a long game to normalise child abuse of all types. Think it through people. Why do you think they are inventing terms like "minor attracted person". This is about normalising the word my post will be deleted for.
@Under-Kaoz3 ай бұрын
@@ancientnpcBut yet they want to raise the age for so many other things. Including making college a requirement acting like 20's are kids. When HS should already teach many basic skills that could get you jobs... as it once did. They were basically what we call community colleges and trade schools now. Now you just play sports, learn languages, and play music or get good grades all in hopes to pay the college machine more money for indoctrination and 60% of unused degrees.
@allwaystherebel4 ай бұрын
What I think Matt failed to say: marriage was initially intended to be within the confines of the Church. The government adopted it legally to monopolize and incentivize with tax breaks. More government intervention. As far as everything else, moral relativism leads to a “freedom” of chaos and hedonism.
@OffGridInvestor4 ай бұрын
Actually it was religious in general. The first Christians were converted pagans who were married under their pagan religion and then had a second Christian marriage to the same people once they converted to Christianity.
@scootmcgoot5704 ай бұрын
Well unfortunately the govt has 💩 all over marriage and incentivized single motherhood. The more children you have out of wedlock the more taxpayer funded benefits you can receive......but NOT if you are married
@christiansoldier774 ай бұрын
@OffGridInvestor Wrong. The first Christians were Jews and it was God who created marriage from the very beginning with Adam and Eve
@athenametzger92694 ай бұрын
I was surprised by Matt not hitting that home. To me that’s an unforced error on his part in the dialogue. He’s too smart to leave that out-maybe there’s another reason, like an agreement with Rogan?? The Biblical framework/covenant for marriage and family is, to me, irrefutably the best design, but flawed humans mess it up through sin, selfishness, abuse, etc. When God is left out of the marriage, and divorce becomes rampant, you end up with the trainwreck American society faces today.
@DarinTWright4 ай бұрын
@@athenametzger9269 Matt didn't push the Christian perspective on the subject because he knew in Joe's eyes that would immediately discredit his argument in it's entirety. While marriage is an extremely important tenant of Christianity, it is not JUST a Christian and/or religious issue. Marriage exists in virtually every culture and religion on Earth. Focusing solely on the Christian point of view would lead to Joe, and thousands of others who hold his same perspective, not even considering the points Matt was trying to articulate about the importance of traditional marriage to society as a whole. Coming from a Christian Conservative, we have to learn to argue on subjects such as this without even bringing theology into it. In the eyes of many people who are on the fence about certain hot topic issues such as abortion, the moment we bring our personal religious beliefs into it they feel that we aren't thinking logically, and are simply spouting religious rhetoric at them.
@jasonpopielarczyk75115 ай бұрын
I love the fact that as much as Joe pushed, Matt never really backed down.
@pr77655 ай бұрын
Joe "Whatabout" Rogan
@EDUAROSOLAS5 ай бұрын
You mean when Matt Walsh pulled a random number out of his ass and Jamie had to correct millions down to a few thousand? If you are that far off with basic facts, you have zero business being anywhere close to this conversation. What a fucking dunce.
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@jasonpopielarczyk7511 did you love when Matt thought that millions had been on therapy when it was thousands? He did a documentary and was off by many orders of magnitude. You failed your sanity check.
@BPoweredLove5 ай бұрын
While I don't agree with Matt on THAT subject, I admired Matt's patience. Very impressive indeed.
@pepefrog74565 ай бұрын
@@TheFloridaBro BRO (my b) i dont think the average joe checks the numbers, why do u think people say shit with so much confidence lmao. they just hope they are right.
@chadeppard51614 ай бұрын
Thank you Joe Rogan for having Matt Walsh speak truth to the world.
@swebilbo3 ай бұрын
and thank you for totaly own Matt on gay marriage....
@leoreaboi97463 ай бұрын
Embarrassing asf why self report
@kdLsmarckee5 ай бұрын
The original air date should be in the description
@trickhealey5 ай бұрын
I clicked “more” and scrolled down to the bottom and saw the release date of nov 6, 2022
@justanotherhuman29615 ай бұрын
total control
@AndyDavidson-n9n5 ай бұрын
This is still incredibly relevant.
@MrXxsoulessniperxx5 ай бұрын
It is. Maybe it's time to put the m3th pipe down.
@ccampbell72145 ай бұрын
I think it's some hack reposting these podcasts to KZbin off Spotify... They do it to Mr Ballen as well ..
@kevincquesnel5 ай бұрын
We need more people speaking up like Mr Walsh. You should be proud of the work you’ve done sir and your family should be too. Keep fighting the good fight. God fearing, hard working, law abiding citizens are on your side. Period
@Heartwing374 ай бұрын
💯
@Cannibalizee4 ай бұрын
Matt should stick to what he knows, which is politics and religion, and leave psychology and psychiatry alone. He doesn't really believe in either and that's just dumb. Even catholic church exorcists believe in mental illness.
@boblinux3704 ай бұрын
@@Cannibalizee You don't need to understand psychology to understand reality. Also, the reality is, no one understands psychology, even the pharma companies don't fully understand how their medications like anti-depressants work. Don't allow credentialism to rule your thought patterns.
@Jane_sian4 ай бұрын
If you have to fear your God you should rethink what you are praying to ... Fear evil, fear humans, fear your destructive potential. God isn't a human God doesn't have human emotions nor expectations....
@frapestyle4 ай бұрын
God-fearing 😂😂😂😂😂 Yeah what a solution 😂😂😂😂
@Majinblaze5 ай бұрын
The definition of "marriage" that Joe proposes here is actually the definition of "Civil Union." The two are not interchangeable because they have different origins and purposes. Matt is 100% correct on this - even if he couldn't quite articulate it in this session. Marriage is the recognition of spiritual AND legal union - coupled with the expectation and opportunity to form a new family unit. A civil union is the recognition of two individuals who love eachother and want to dedicate themselves legally to that coupling. There is a REASON that gay people want "mariage" and not "civil union" - and that's the connotation that the term brings -- To set out on a journey of building a family together and becoming parents for the next generation is such a big deal to human beings (since time immemorial) that we have always gone out of the way to celebrate these unions in a big way. A civil union doesn't get the same treatment societally because it is, literally, just designed for the happiness of those involved. It brings with it no such glorification, because it's not a proclamation of one's willingness to further the species and/or participate in societal customs. It's just two people saying "this one's mine." The problem, as Matt tried to explain, is that modern society has completely lost touch with this fact - and is treating them interchangeably. The result is that marriage as an institution has been degraded of all of it's value and is treated identically to civil unions - The only noteable difference now is that mariage comes with a few extra legal benefits. More and more young people are so disillusioned / removed from greater society and no longer see the value of marriage. Young men especially, since signing those papers essentially gives the women absolute control over their lives - with the opportunity to ruin them entirely and walk away scot-free. When marriage is degraded to "just a legal document" that "says you love eachother," more and more young people are asking "well...why is that needed then? Why sign my life away unnecessarily?"
@GaelynCunningham5 ай бұрын
Yeah, I was little bummed at Matt's response here. Definitely lacking. I thought he'd have a better grasp and response than that.
@kaitlynhope12685 ай бұрын
You articulated this very well! I agreed with Matt Walsh on every point he made but it seemed like there was a bigger point that he was trying to get across that he just couldn’t find the words for.
@Leo4gzs5 ай бұрын
Excellent. I was thinking about this while watching the episode.
@cayceesmith26505 ай бұрын
Wow! That last part was a little rough. I was married for 16 years, was narcissistically abused, and when I finally escaped, left 3 business that we had built together, a new house on an acreage, boat, cars, trucks, RV's, etc. I got no cash, no alimony, no child support. Our daughter and I were homeless for two years while I dug us out of the hole. So no, marriage is not a contract that allows a woman to ruin a man and take all his stuff.
@Sweaty_Grandpa5 ай бұрын
@@cayceesmith2650 yes it is.
@HeWhoRoamsAimlessly4 ай бұрын
Society needs more discussions like this.
@ryu210gonzales95 ай бұрын
I left this on when i ran to the store and now my cat is a conservative and has been telling me the benefits of converting to Christianity for the last hour.
@ryankenney3095 ай бұрын
So your cat has a brain 😂
@ellenwelch82675 ай бұрын
Haha 😂
@TomRouton5 ай бұрын
Smart cat
@muximus27715 ай бұрын
What is a cat?
@michaelblaes98475 ай бұрын
Please stop lying. We all know that your cat doesn't even like you and would never spend an entire hour talking to you.
@davidolyott55035 ай бұрын
Very interesting commentary on marriage. Thanks Joe for having the courage to host these type of discussions. Props to Matt for being able to so clearly explain his position.
@davidtomkins42425 ай бұрын
Shame his arguments didn’t follow logic and joe exposed the gaping holes in his backwards, religiously dogmatic thinking
@jeffhatmaker8175 ай бұрын
Although I understand your sentiment, what kind of world are we in whe we have to "thank" someone for stating obvious facts?
@aaronflynndevereux18325 ай бұрын
They seem to have a disagreement on what the fundamental purpose of marriage is. Joe seems to think it's about individual happiness and matt seems to think it's about the way individual relationships and society interact to make a stable environment to raise kids. Both are right in their own sense
@adamfuller56405 ай бұрын
@@aaronflynndevereux1832it’s the liberal worldview (individual Liberty, personal happiness) vs the conservative worldview (societal stability and cohesion, tradition and connection).
@davidtomkins42425 ай бұрын
@@aaronflynndevereux1832 agree, it's the order in which they view it. Joe thinks a marriage solidifies a loving bond between 2 people, who are then in a position to have a baby. Matt thinks you decide to reproduce and so get married to provide a stable environment in which to raise a baby. Joe doesn't regard the desire for baby-producing as a pre-requisite for marriage.
@mynamejeff48835 ай бұрын
Glad to see that they are uploading all of these back onto KZbin.
@nik07nik5 ай бұрын
Back? they were never here.
@mynamejeff48835 ай бұрын
@@nik07nik Yes they were. Before the Spotify deal. Maybe not this specific one, and there are several that were done while Joe was only really on Spotify but all you could usually find on KZbin were things on the clips channel. It is nice to see Joe's podcasts back on KZbin.
@yobabybubba5 ай бұрын
@@mynamejeff4883This one was originally on KZbin. I've reached a point at hour and a 1/2 in realizing I heard this before and I can't believe I stumbled upon your conversation here By the way, I just googled it a little while ago and yes, this was from 2022.
@Kayrunningandcoffeeaddict5 ай бұрын
@@mynamejeff4883 Yes!!!!!!
@ToackАй бұрын
Joe Rogan not getting Matt's point for a straight hour is amazing
@Daagon309Ай бұрын
Matt Walsh is clearly a devout Catholic and says it multiple times during the interview (Having four kids, the reason behind why he has his podcast is to create a cultural space, mentioning the church and marriage connection unprompted (read, for Catholics). The Daily Wire was started by a devout Jew who had a very similar argument with Rogan on marriage in a separate episode (Ben Shapiro) and also features Jordan Peterson who is also a devout Christian (Peterson will never directly mention his religious influence because he's a Canadian, and Canadians see that as taboo to discuss openly, unlike Americans). Joe Rogan is not religious, though he's a spiritual person. He was raised by hippies. Joe and Matt have fundamentally different values in how they were raised and see the world very differently. Marriage is now a state institution and not a religious institution, and this is a gap that many religious people simply don't wish to give credence true, no matter how true it happens to be. I'm impressed they were able to have a civil conversation about these differences in viewpoints, though Matt could have saved us a bunch of time by just saying "I believe this because I'm a Catholic." because he regurgitated all the talking points of the Catholic church and continued to politely avoid Joe's verbal sledgehammers.
@ashtree14414 күн бұрын
@@Daagon309except Matt said and argued it outside of religion, because of the societal and cultural effects, which is what Joe seemed unable to grasp
@nonosays5 ай бұрын
Marriage has never been looked upon in any society throughout history as merely a construct of Man, it has always been seen as a creation of God and Nature and merely recognized as such by Man. This is so fundamental it defies any disagreement. It is because man and woman alone carry the procreative potential that marriage has been seen as the building block of society. It is a new thing to say now Marriage is a lifestyle choice based on individual feelings. A formal acknowledgement of a gay union might be a good thing, but it can never replace the purpose of Marriage for society. This is a fundamental change in the way society has been ordered since recorded time. We will, as Matt suggests, see in time what this change has yielded for society and our civilization.
@Josh-m5u5 ай бұрын
The whole second half of this podcast really put on display how joe is only able to see reality through a hedonic lens.. from devorce, to the choìce of childless union, to people prefering same sex relations... everything he said was on wants and feels... total hedonism. Marriage is duty not choice. Sex for pleasure is an immoral selfish act. No one is born gay, some kids just never have their narcissism checked by a strong father and a loving mother in a proper marriage and so they come up with warped perceptions of sexuality and self to societies detriment.
@chloesanders36315 ай бұрын
Once it gets to that point though, the source of degradation will likely be skewed and/or ignored completely by the majority. Not trying to be a negative nelly, it's been a pattern of human history to twist said history for one's own personal gains
@snu38775 ай бұрын
Conservatives were laughed at/derided for saying the legalization of gay marriage was the beginning of a slippery slope. And here we are. Once gay people achieved their goal, they had to figure out where to turn their attention and funds. They chose trans rights, although many gays are either unaware of that or furiously backpedaling away from that.
@CipherDiaz5 ай бұрын
Its not that clear cut. The idea of marriage that we have today came in through christianity. Roman law, greek law, asian law, ancient egyptian law -- they were all different. Marriage in roman and greek terms had nothing to do with love. In fact, up until the middle-ages the very idea that you married for love was regarded as absurd. Your parents picked for you, often in a strategic way to join families and obtain wealth. So the idea of romantic or "love" based marriage is a relatively new notion. Christianity did not care about the love aspect either until the age of the chivalry. People really need to read history, including the darker aspects
@MsJom1235 ай бұрын
@@CipherDiazindeed. That is the individual level it affects. The societal is less children. We are living that out heavily at this point. The west is well below replacement level at this point. The need in a society to at minimum keep replacement rate cannot be understated. This is why couples that marry and don’t have children actually do hurt other people. The economy suffers, the social programs become more burdened, the next generation of workers disappear and on and on. Then amplify those problems even further by saying anyone can get married and it doesn’t matter at all. The two same sex cannot naturally have children and that won’t help. Then if they do decide they want children they will have to use surrogacy or something. In this method they are intentionally depriving the child of either the actual mother or father. In some cases both. (This is especially egregious as a child has a right to be raised by their biological mother and father. Does that always play out, unfortunately not. In cases where the parents did something to lose those rights for the safety of the child or something. However as a society we shouldn’t start with that.) And that is all to fulfill their desire to have kids. A good thing in it itself but done in the most selfish way possible. Certainly marriage as it has historically been defined is better for everyone it impacts.
@jfuriouse12345 ай бұрын
Official Rogan quote “people shouldn’t be expected to stay married for life” lol Joe, that’s what he’s talking about.. Marriage doesn’t matter anymore, he’s explaining why that’s happened.. And yea, if you make a contracted commitment to a marriage, it should be hard to get out of..
@davidtomkins42425 ай бұрын
It used to be hard to get out of as recently as the 50s and 60s. You were shunned by your close society. It caused misery for everyone involved - those who stayed in loveless cohabitation, kids growing up with parents who hate each other or live in fear of their parent, and those who were ostracised by their church and village/society. We changed divorce laws for the better
@jesseryan32565 ай бұрын
Gay marriage has only been legal in the US for less than 20 years so explain the increasing divorce rate and other things they discussed before it was legalized. Marriage may not mean as much as it used to but I highly doubt gay marriage caused as much of that problem as Matt is saying. Realistically it’s the lack of thought before actually getting married and then the easiness of modern day divorce.
@gurugru59585 ай бұрын
People sometimes get into marriages that turn out to be incredible abusive... at the very least, it should be easy for people to get away from that.
@sameash31535 ай бұрын
@@gurugru5958 I don't know why people say this like it's some kind of own. Most hardcore stay-married-for-life advocates acknowledge the "Three As" as acceptable reasons for divorce: abuse, addiction, adultery. What is being criticized is no-fault divorce, where neither of the above are present.
@gurugru59585 ай бұрын
@@sameash3153 Yeah, I can agree with that.
@harloss98395 ай бұрын
Joe keeps asking "what's the damage to a straight relationship because of a gay relationship" Matt Keeps answering "the damage I'm talking about is to society and the safe and best environment for child rearing NOT to my existing marriage or any other individual relationship" then Joe obviously doesn't listen and just asks the same question again...
@ThePossumone4 ай бұрын
Yes - Matt looks Big Picture not his own personal inconvenience
@nedhill12424 ай бұрын
@@ThePossumone Exactly and if you look at countries and cultures doing better than America they are all traditional, homogenous, and in so many ways, if not completely, culturally opposite of America. And as America has become more secular and progressive we have declined. The irony is every country progressives point to as superior to America, their cultures are the exact opposite of America and often Catholic. And they love brown and/or Muslim cultures that are radically traditional, which is what they despise about America. Their cognitive dissonance is epic.
@ThePossumone4 ай бұрын
@@nedhill1242 interesting isnt it how deceived people can be
@nedhill12424 ай бұрын
@@ThePossumone It proves how easy it is to brainwash people. I’m 58 years old. People I went to college with back in the 80s would never ever have been on board with today’s radical agenda back then. But now whatever the Democrats tell them to think they rabidly defend. They love to mock conservatives and libertarians as being brainwashed, but we actually believe in objective truth, science, reality, data, science. They are the ones that believe things that are objectively false. We can prove what they believe is factually incorrect. But they still will not change their mind. It’s literally 1984 and precisely as Yuri Bezmenov described. During pride I I got into fights on Instagram with very radical & privileged very attractive white women in their 20s and 30s. They loved saying go away old white man. And of course they arrogantly thought they were being funny and profound. I would immediately point out that they have a soft privileged life thanks to old white men. Everything they use and enjoy daily and take for granted was invented by an old white man. They have the right to vote because of old white men. They have freedom thanks to old white men. The reason they can even have a pride parade and the rights enjoyed by homosexuals today is because of old white men. So show some respect & appreciation. The combination of the media selling out to the far left and the radicalization of the public school system by way of teachers union is what got us to where we are today.
@bruno97644 ай бұрын
Which countries?
@rassclat1224 ай бұрын
I have recently met someone who identified as "they", not a bad person but... They had a traumatic childhood What a surprise.
@theironforce30005 ай бұрын
For anyone wondering why this got uploaded now? this is an old episode? Etc. They are uploading the great majority of the back-catalog on KZbin again. Prob has to do with signing the new Spotify deal Joe did several months ago.
@hdca185 ай бұрын
ok thanks. This is what i was thinking.
@SVW19765 ай бұрын
Spotify exclusivity is over. It's that simple.
@slapppp8155 ай бұрын
Thanks
@Lemonbonbon5 ай бұрын
Yes Spotify wouldn't upload the more "controversial" episodes. More censorship.
@edgar96515 ай бұрын
Good that they release the episodes. But I think it should be clear in the title that this was from years ago.
@charlaporter77734 ай бұрын
2 men I love to listen to and respect...and this is another reason to respect them!! This is how 2 people who disagree sit and have a discussion
@lizevandeven79045 ай бұрын
Thank you Matt for graciously standing firm.
@Oded20023 ай бұрын
This is a model of how different sides on sometimes very emotional social issues should be able to discuss their views. It was respectful and I, for one, appreciated Joe's probing, but respectful questioning of Matt Walsh on an issue that they disagreed about. Matt is clearly coming from a conservative Catholic perspective and Joe Rogan presenting a rational secular perspective. I think the audience learned a lot about both the issue that they agreed about, the trans issue, and the issue that they disagreed about, gay marriage. This kind of dialogue can bring us all together, rather than tear us apart, when it focuses on the issues rather than attacking the person. This is how we used to argue issues in the 1970s when Republicans and Democrats could live with each other rather than trying to cancel each other out. Kudos to Joe Rogan.
@cherylg90744 ай бұрын
Great conversation about marriage. I converted to Catholicism to be married in my fiance's church. 15 years and 3 children later, he wanted a divorce. We got pregnant by choice, and one of the reasons for that choice is that we could afford 3 children with both of us raising them, and we could parent them together. When he divorced me, he left me to raise those 3 children alone. All 3 children are now grown and have mental health issues, both from their abandonment by their father, and because I needed to leave them home alone to work because my income was now all we had to pay housing costs, food, clothing, etc. It was too much for me to provide for them alone. I never wanted the divorce, but was forced to accept this life he chose for me when he decided to leave us. I 100% agree with Matt that divorce is too easy. Both parties should want it. If he was going to have to be unhappy in our marriage, maybe his unhappiness would have been much better than the damage done to these children who had to be raised in a single family household with the economic struggles and lack of supervision that single parent families have.
@MelissaDisha4 ай бұрын
Well, a according to Jesus. Divorce is not recognized. So if your ex sleeps with anyone else he's an adulterer. He can't marry again either. However YOU can marry again because he broke the covenant of Marriage which frees you.
@thefinaldispatch4 ай бұрын
Did you stay intimate with him? If not, time to look in the mirror. Always two sides to every story
@furiousg3orge4 ай бұрын
@@thefinaldispatch It’s disturbing that this is your knee-jerk response to this woman’s comment.
@rayflores98544 ай бұрын
Afford lol Having children should not be about what you can afford. This is "boss girl" mentality and exactly why we are declining in replacement rate.
@MercuryRisingFast4 ай бұрын
@@cherylg9074 get childsupport
@imaginedmountains23115 ай бұрын
Originally aired November 6th, 2022.
@denisea.90334 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@lyt484 ай бұрын
Damn! Why haven’t they put that in the description! This is so confusing!! Thanks for sharing though!!
@karihouke9744 ай бұрын
Yes. Today Matt has 6 kids.
@adammustafa33304 ай бұрын
@@karihouke974 Fuck sake. That's too many kids. Everyone and their goddamn kids.
@karihouke9744 ай бұрын
@@adammustafa3330 yep. The more the merrier.
@jamiesimmons31044 ай бұрын
This is why many on the left love to play games with the language. The more we tear down definitions, the easier it is for them to make the words mean whatever they want.
@jameskozy72543 ай бұрын
They mess with connotations as well in order to subconsciously sway opinion
@deadfall03245 ай бұрын
My father would always tell me “silence can make a man speak” just nod and listen when someone talks and they will tell you a lot, maybe more than they intend
@deligeorgieva85355 ай бұрын
nice to see a friendly calm debate between two respectable men
@goon69324 ай бұрын
So who do you think won?
@chef76584 ай бұрын
does that matter actually? i think this was a good conversation on its own and good points are made. maybe judge the video on that fact instead of a winner/loser situation. @goon6932
@deligeorgieva85354 ай бұрын
@@goon6932 i actually don't have a bias. I'm a longtime Matt Walsh fan and although I agree with lots of his opinions, i also agreed with Joe most of the time here so. There's no winner, just a really good podcast
@tmusa20023 ай бұрын
This was a debate?
@deligeorgieva85353 ай бұрын
@@tmusa2002 you're right, i guess I can't really call this a debate. they weren't trying to win the argument, they were just stating their opinions and reasoning behind them
@dudedarkness5 ай бұрын
I absolutely love that there was a debate on a sensitive topic and both men remained gentmanly (not a word) and cordial. This is something we need to see more of in the political and professional arenas. Great work!
@Absrod4 ай бұрын
Agreed. Gentlemanly is a word btw
@Tanav7772 ай бұрын
I can’t get enough of listening to Matt Walsh ❤
@chrisgunther1095 ай бұрын
On marriage I don't get why Joe keeps going back to "well it's their choice." Matt's whole point is "it's not good for society." There are a whole lot of personal choices that everyone can make which will lead society to absolute ruin, and the vast majority of them would not effect you personally in the immediate.
@fredricks87015 ай бұрын
Gay marriave will lead t0 "societal ruin"? 🙄
@ExpertContrarian5 ай бұрын
Because it’s their choice. You have no actual proof that is bad for society. Most marriages could be argued as bad for society. So should the government evaluate each and every single potential marriage to see whether we will be harmful and be the ones to decide whether it can happen? Why do you want more government oversight and tyranny?
@tashavdlinde62605 ай бұрын
No, I don't have a problem with gay marriage, but I do believe that's where the slippery slope began and that there wasn't a line drawn ever since.
@Viralboatuk5 ай бұрын
100% agree jow ruined the conversation on the topic
@cynthiag15575 ай бұрын
That's the beauty of your personal political beliefs. I"m a centrist, libertarian but right leaning libertarian and while I think it's wrong to teach this gendered confusion to children, if you are an adult in a same sex relationship, and want to get married, then you should be able to get married. I"m all for people being treated respectfully and equally unless they give me, or society as a whole a reason not to treat them respectfully or equally.
@TheTexasBoys5 ай бұрын
Noah Webster's 1884 dictionary defines marriage as "the act of uniting a man and woman for life; wedlock; the legal union of a man and woman for life." It emphasizes the legal and lifelong union between a man and woman.
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@@TheTexasBoys great for 1884, what's that matter now?
@mepatton4 ай бұрын
@@TheFloridaBro There is no justification for changing it now, and no authority to do so. Unlike the approach taken today where a cabal of ideological nitwits changes the definitions of words in online dictionaries on a whim, to suite their ideological predilections, the original compilers of dictionaries worked diligently to clarify definitions that expressed the observable and documented meaning of the word as used in society. They took their role seriously.
@TheFloridaBro4 ай бұрын
@mepatton an appeal to definition for a cultural construct like marriage is the lowest form of argument you could make, if it can even be called an argument. That was the definition in 1884 for those particular, very serious men. Their definition doesn't extend to the infinite future.
@mepatton4 ай бұрын
@@TheFloridaBro You're entirely wrong. The definition laid down in 1884 was mostly definitely NOT "the defition for those particular, very serious men," it was the OBSERVABLE RECOGNIZED DEFINITION of society as far back as they could document it. You demonstrate no comprehension of how dictionaries came to be, and no awareness that the English speaking world is not the only society which has recognized what marriage is. You will not find any significant different in the understanding of what marriage is in any society in the history of the world, regardless of the language they spoke. Marriage isn't a "cutural construct" as you #RegressiveleftistDipshits use the term. It is an observed action ("to marry") and an observed state of being ("marriage"). No one sat down one day and made up what they thought it should be at the time; both the act and the state of being predate written history and are present in all civilizations.
@justinhill23784 ай бұрын
@@mepattonin 1884 the word gay meant something totally different also.
@1000sister5 ай бұрын
I think Joe doesn’t really buy that the family unit is the basic building block for society to be good. Having a high quality society is not valued these days maybe because we have not experienced it recently.
@woodandwandco5 ай бұрын
The family is the fundamental building block of the society. Society is the larger family. If the society is not a single family, it is low-quality. A fractured society is a larger, fractured family. Families are a form of social embedding as old as evolution itself. Social embedding is a prerequisite for a high-quality society of any lifeform we are familiar with. Unfortunately, the enemies of all-human potentiation figured out a simple trick: convince children their parents are ignorant perpetually by embedding subtext in family-focused media (cartoons, children's edutainment films, holiday films, social dramas, etc.), by redirecting their interests away from the norm perpetually by funding novel socio-political constructs (feudalism, industrialism, communism, capitalism, techno-feudalism, etc.) The modes of governance are shifted generationally and intentionally to perpetuate the permanent disabling of families emerging from poverty or providing legitimate socio-economic instruction across generations. It is an old technique, as old as society itself, but the majority are too plugged in to the constructs to figure the totality of the system out.
@chrisyoung619013 күн бұрын
I find it hard to believe that Matt Walsh did not go to college. I would jave thought he had a degree in journalism or psychology or something. It's emblematic of how important common sense is
@Joyloulou5 ай бұрын
This was such a DEEP AND POWERFUL conversation. I love Matt Walsh and Joe Rogan. I am a Catholic Convert ex feminist
@TommyGunz3275 ай бұрын
Matt is 100% correct about the marriage issue. Joe is clueless like usual
@Joyloulou5 ай бұрын
@@TommyGunz327 is not Catholic yet but I did include him in my Rosary Prayer today with Father Rocky on Relevant Radio❤️🙏 I am asking Our Lady’s Intercession for his conversion. He is a good hearted man and seems just on the edge of realizing that he has a desire for a Faith Life. God changes hearts…I WAS a liberal and in my conversion to Catholicism I truly understand the disorder a mysogyny underneath homosexuality (I was bisexual and through conversion as well as Jungian type work I totally have been healed of same sex attraction)…see Mario Bergner’s book “Setting Love in Order” and Leanne Paynes book “The Broken Image”. Gay men were either molested/ or absent father/ overbearing mother…there is always a deep family of origin issue or molestation (even with Lesbians). In Lesbians there is some mother hunger absence of maternal love absence of father too.
@sebastiangaraycocheagomezd4735 ай бұрын
@@TommyGunz327really? How so?
@RallyTheTally5 ай бұрын
Based. I'm a Baptist but I agree with that.
@aljan50475 ай бұрын
@@TommyGunz327 Joe took the pride month to heart 🤣
@alexandertrossen55615 ай бұрын
I love how intelligent and pragmatic MEN speak with eachother. There is a certain type of respect and accountability that makes the conversations blossom and become very contemplative. Each participant is evolving mentaly right in front of your eyes
@lisareiter53685 ай бұрын
That’s what I was just thinking. I sent this to my son as an example of good conversation.
@rgCA_011235 ай бұрын
❤
@christopherrobbin8475 ай бұрын
Men remain civilized with other men because with every interaction there is a threat of violence, so typically they will both maintain their composure
@nik07nik5 ай бұрын
Except when Joe expects Matt to answer for an entire religion. He have never treated a Muslim this way on the show.
@austinfonk89455 ай бұрын
@@lisareiter5368great idea 🙏🏻
@mhedden0335 ай бұрын
I didn't realize this was from 2022 until Matt said he only had 4 kids.
@shinkablack5 ай бұрын
Haha
@JAMONCT5 ай бұрын
Back when Joe did not care about the woke mob…. Cant remember the last time he had a figure like Matt
@dr.dawna.lancaster6385 ай бұрын
😁
@YujiroHanmaaaa4 ай бұрын
Joe doesnt give a shit about " woke mob" and anti woke warriors + maga cult @@JAMONCT
@timothyvenable3336Ай бұрын
Wish Matt Walsh would bring the real issue to light. The real problem is a heart problem and people rebellion against their creator
@cainfrittswallace78954 ай бұрын
Got to give Joe and Matt credit for being able to have a reasonable discussion on points that they very firmly disagrees with and be able to come out at the end disagree and be civil about it, the world needs more of this we're allowed to disagree and still be civil!
@ambersolomon79425 ай бұрын
Matt Walsh is a true inspiration and love his work with the Daily Wire. Fantastic episode!
@crunchywashere35135 ай бұрын
Matt is a clown at best
@xandyrwlkyr25635 ай бұрын
@@crunchywashere3513 No, I don't always agree with him. But, he is very serious about his convictions and for the most part they are based on sound reason and data. Clown is the last descriptor you could append to such a person.
@amostlyreasonableguy5 ай бұрын
@@crunchywashere3513yes, when I think of clown I think calm, rational person with consistent values who can articulate them well in an even tone of voice
@adrianharry53365 ай бұрын
Quite interestingly EVERYTHING Joe Rogan said to defend homosexuality is what Trans advocates use to defend transgenderism. It’s quite remarkable that each generation is swept up by something new with the EXACT SAME SENTIMENT, P3dophilia 🔜
@adrianharry53365 ай бұрын
@@crunchywashere3513how so?
@patrichohl-uv7be5 ай бұрын
My favorite episode. Matt Walsh speaks the truth. Every parent in Portland needs to watch "what is a woman"
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
How do you know what he's saying is "truth"? Because you agree with him?
@patrichohl-uv7be5 ай бұрын
Yes
@thzzzt5 ай бұрын
Especially those parents than don't understand that Portlandia is intended as a comedy.
@johnv68065 ай бұрын
@@TheFloridaBroit's biological fact. How do you know you're human?
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@@johnv6806 I understand the principle, but there is more of a social element to how people choose to present themselves. There is such thing as a biological woman, and there is such thing as a trans woman. Trans species might not be too far behind, depending on how technology/biological sciences advance.
@michaelceklosky79113 ай бұрын
Love both these men, Matt is super respectful and this is the first time I've been unhappy with Joe's interruptions during major points!
@markemilyshepherd79814 ай бұрын
I’m sure KZbin is throttling this video. It should have millions of views.
@patrickbateman16604 ай бұрын
You guys say this about EVERYTHING. SHUT UP. This is from a 2 year old podcast that reuploaded. Not everything is conspiracy
@blueninja875 ай бұрын
Bring Matt back for a another conversation Joe!
@ShimonFrankel4 ай бұрын
What more is there to talk about?
@blueninja874 ай бұрын
@@ShimonFrankel Updates. Plenty of things. Cmon now. That's what makes joe Rogan podcast #1. He brings people back for more conversations.
@johnnyfreespeech58154 ай бұрын
@@ShimonFrankelThe usual stuff of course. UFOs, conspiracies and cults etc... it would be great to see Matt and Joe discuss the legitimacy of Bigfoot identifying as non binary.
@ericshaunfield93045 ай бұрын
Statute of limitations for medical malpractice in most states is 2 years. The high being 5 years. If the statute of limitations was raised. Especially for minors so they have a solid decade after they turn 18… and absolutely NO doctors would do hormones, puberty blockers, or surgery on minors.
@ericsmith15085 ай бұрын
The problem is that it isn't "malpractice" to do a transition surgery or medications. These are procedures that are fully legal for the doctor to do, and as long as the end results are technically correct, then it isn't "malpractice." If the puberty blockers blocked puberty exactly as intended, if the surgery went as expected and was performed correctly, then it isn't "malpractice." From a legal standpoint, that is. From a moral standpoint, it is evil, ritual mutilation in the name of Satan, and should absolutely be stopped, not just in minors but in adults as well!! I said what I said. 🤨
@BDFigMom5 ай бұрын
THIS!
@Orangeisactually5 ай бұрын
@@ericsmith1508 let’s make it malpractice then 😎
@terryfinley49795 ай бұрын
That’s a great point.
@akboyz15 ай бұрын
@@ericsmith1508That is factually incorrect. When treating a patient you have to have to determine: the right patient, right medication/procedure, the right dose, the right time right route. This is typically used for medication administration but is true for any aspect of the medical system. Deviation from it does constitute malpractice. You can't suggest that A: a child can consent to any of this, or B: that a practitioner is not liable for their actions that have long term harm so long as they did their buchery well.
@Anh-Cali2 ай бұрын
I am Strong Catholic and love Joe for being extremely open and professional in talking to some one with an opposite view!
@johnnunn86885 ай бұрын
Hate to see Joe using ‘she/her’ for a man. Matt has it right.
@Whyexes4 ай бұрын
Weird how he can acknowledge how the movie shows the insanity of the position but then Joe also plays ball.
@funonoldwheels71503 ай бұрын
@@WhyexesRogan is still a lefty in his heart. A more reasonable lefty, but a lefty nonetheless
@maddieburke3174 ай бұрын
Joe I’ve been a nurse and NP for over 40 years. Among the saddest times I have seen are childless couples that lose their spouse. It is heartbreaking! I am now a widow and so thankful for my children and grandchildren. It is the way of nature
@Chongfjongdong4 ай бұрын
Very selfish thought pattern you have
@stormfath3r7544 ай бұрын
@@ChongfjongdongShe is literally expressing empathy for widows, and her gratitude for her situation. Who hurt you my guy?
@Nellsbells794 ай бұрын
❤ I agree
@Nellsbells794 ай бұрын
that’s selfish? It is heartbreaking and if you have a heart you’d agree.
@tylergardner24663 ай бұрын
Jesus still loves you@@Chongfjongdong
@Jfidelis14 ай бұрын
Marriage is not primarily for the couple's personal fulfillment (as Joe seems to believe). It's to maintain a stable family of a father and mother for their offspring. In other words, it's about the kids.
@petesmitt4 ай бұрын
Those on the left try to muddy the water by stating not everybody is fertile or want to have children in a marriage; the key issue with a man and woman joining in marriage is that there is the potential for children; this potential is of course impossible with gay unions.
@linnforfreedom4 ай бұрын
Yes! Thank you! It's about creating a safe space for children where both partners are required to put in the effort necessary to sustain and maintain the family.
@reklanora4 ай бұрын
What are you about. You don't need marriage for two consenting adult who made the baby to give it a stable family. Neither that being married is going to provide that stable family for sure. Marriage is just a man made invention, a word.
@Neelinmact4 ай бұрын
Do you really think that your father and mother married to fulfill a duty ,, they didn’t even knew that you will be a duty that they would have to first produce and then raise ,,
@joekinnear46714 ай бұрын
Marriage exists for tax reasons. Dont be ridiculous. Actually loving somebody and marriage can be two separate things, otherwise protestants and divorce wouldnt exist. Being gay and in love at the same time is possible, depsite all the rhetoric and hate matt walsh and his type spread.
@mikelabor76887 күн бұрын
Another excellent interview. Matt is a solid guy, well worth hearing him out.
@angelodimas19625 ай бұрын
Dude I'm getting chills listening to this... So glad we have people like Matt big fan had to catch this episode.
@swampypolitics95745 ай бұрын
Kids and humans have never before in history had so much access to " mental health care".. and yet it's getting worse. This should scream volumes
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@swampypolitics9574 kids and humans? What a strange set of categories lol.
@swampypolitics95745 ай бұрын
@@TheFloridaBro as in kids, the main point. And humanity in general.
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@@AlCapwnd-tb5ow Obama care bro
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@AlCapwnd-tb5ow idk if I do, it was meant to be funny bro. I'll "lol" to alert your funny side next time.
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@AlCapwnd-tb5ow well look at us, guess we just aren't funny
@Cacuofa5 ай бұрын
Saying you are 5 when you are 38 is less crazy than a man saying he is a woman. At least sometime he was 5 and knows what being 5 feels like. You can’t say you feel you are a woman’s because you like the color pink and fashion shows. I don’t understand women who are in favor of this. Doing this only serves to demean and diminish the real significance of being a woman to frivolous, material ideas.
@beanybabyrabie4 ай бұрын
This is SUCH a good point. At some point all these males had a moment where they though “well I feel this way which is different than some of the guys I’ve observed, women must feel this way too therefore I am a woman” SMH
@xJessiGirlProxАй бұрын
It’s really wild, the achievement that documentary has been for Matt. I’ve followed him for years, since I was a teenager, when he was just writing blogs on sites like The Blaze and doing videos in his car. I just knew him as “oh it’s that Catholic guy Matt Walsh that always spits facts in his blogs” and I followed him on FB. Then he joined the DW and has done great there, but wow, to think that now he’s the guy who created a documentary (of great quality) that’s really become a cultural, historical accomplishment, that became a widespread phenomenon amongst not just those on the right side of the aisle, and was actually very compelling, whether people want to admit it or not. QUITE the achievement!
@Damudean4 ай бұрын
What other people do in a marriage to you doesn’t directly affect you. But it does diminish what marriage is and it’s importance overall
@beanybabyrabie4 ай бұрын
It DIRECTLY impacts society
@scesfizia4 ай бұрын
@@beanybabyrabieIt really doesn’t, I think the disgusting things done in the name of Christianity have impacted society
@scousiered31244 ай бұрын
@@scesfizia One does not negate the other. A marriage confers benefits. The reason for those benefits was an assumption that the marriage would result in a family (when nearly all had families if they could). If that is not now the assumption, why are we conferring benefits? Because people are in love: so people not in love should be punished..? So I get it. It's a status that the church and state allow marriage for the benefit of the children. Easy divorce does devalue marriage: no-one goes in thinking they are in this for life anymore and will jump ship when it becomes not worth it. So it has been eroded from all sides.
@scesfizia4 ай бұрын
@@scousiered3124 What are you babbling on about? No relevance whatsoever.
@jameseverett49764 ай бұрын
@@scesfizia "in the name of"? what does that even mean? Oh, right.... it means you can throw an infinite chain of blame at something or someone you have a bone to pick with, because somehow or some way there's a connection that can bemade with literally any 2 entities, organizations, names, institutions, or ideas. Like all white people were born "in the name of" slavery? Or all mice are killed "in the name of" Sylvester the cat. The funnest ones though are whenever good intentions go awry, [as they always do sooner or later] then Christianity - a set of general beliefs that revolutionized society & brought us out of the dark ages, and is the foundation of modern legal philosophy - is to blame. How do you blame a vast set of ideas, though? Are all the doncrines of Christianity to blame for marriage problems? Would it be better to not have marriage in the first place, no families, just let all women who get pregnant abort their kids or fend for themselves? Which brings us to the final and inevitable question: If Christianity is to blame for X problem, do you have a better solution? Can you teach us your solution, so that the situation you're blaming on Christianity, can be eradicated and prevented from happening? Have you thought out your solution sufficiently, so that it is actually practical and works consistently, without causing other problems that are even worse? Like, have you tested it out, and proved it's efficiency in both solving the problem, and not creating other, more severe problems?
@dyelmode5 ай бұрын
Matt is so well spoken, his way of explaining with a dry sense of humor just gets my goat
@lasagnasux49345 ай бұрын
A lot of people don't get his humor. Like the time he off-handedly and hyperbolically called anime 'satanic' all kinds of news outlets were railing against him over this obvious joke. And it's Matt, so once they started attacking him on it, he doubled and tripled down.
@jedicodm43415 ай бұрын
Matt Walshes documentary should be put into school systems
@noless5 ай бұрын
It was better than I thought it would be. Funny, tragic, scary
@salty792222 күн бұрын
Wow this episode was a clash of the minds and I LOVE IT!!! I am sorely missing conversations like this.
@Local_Shark_Enthusiast74625 ай бұрын
I wish the film was on public places for those extremely misinformed people this film is aimed for. Love your work Matt 🫶
@patrickboyle9324 ай бұрын
Matts not in the business of informing people. He's in the business of making money by talking about things that he is entirely unqualified to talk about.
@billmara72155 ай бұрын
This is a great conversation by two thoughtful people and no hatred. Thank you both.
@macngeeseyt60296 ай бұрын
Sweet baby gang come on!
@jflesh86735 ай бұрын
GAAAYYY…
@guitardadsinc5 ай бұрын
@@jflesh8673how … dare you… insult thy sweet baby gang!? We will find you. 😢
@jflesh86735 ай бұрын
@@respectforthefdeadd it’s the gayest thing you can refer to yourself as and it’s Matt Walsh..
@robertfrancois60645 ай бұрын
😆is Matt the sweet daddy? Who came up with that? I’m not here to tease anyone but that’s awfully gay
@JenniferMiller-sx1xn5 ай бұрын
@@robertfrancois6064it’s just an awesome troll
@SumBoarding18 күн бұрын
Matt is so awesome, Dudes humor is gold asf.
@frankperdue65855 ай бұрын
I know they always switch around, but the Matt Walsh ARMS AGAPE is the greatest thumbnail EVER
@garrett8925 ай бұрын
Marriage has become more of a legal status for taxes and protections under the law than a sacred union between two people. Society is slowly devolving.
@jimbob94075 ай бұрын
Do you know why the tax incentive is there?
@musemuser7775 ай бұрын
Orwellian nightmare now...
@DeadEyedTye5 ай бұрын
Genuine marriage stopped existing well over 30 years ago if you didn't notice.
@dewindae30595 ай бұрын
What Joe calls marriage and what Matt calls marriage are two different things.
@drunknluv785 ай бұрын
I understand both sides. Matt is explaining the reason marriage exists while Joe is explaining why people want to marry. Both correct in their own way.
@mitchc35695 ай бұрын
Joe Is NOT a Texan.
@edjackson43895 ай бұрын
That's because the true definition of marriage isn't clear. Unless you're speaking of the legal aspects
@DarkLawify5 ай бұрын
@@edjackson4389 No it is perfectly clear. It is just people outside of the religious context in which it should remain, don't believe the sacramental value of it. Have your civil unions, I have nothing against that, but to call them marriage... is pushing it.
@dino_spamonie5 ай бұрын
@@mitchc3569I was slamming my head against the wall listening to Joe explain what he thinks marriage is
@badshodi4 ай бұрын
This country is getting worse by the minute. Thank goodness for people like Matt that fights this craziness
@nrg6245Ай бұрын
Matt Walsh is so chill and dope but what he’s tackling is so deep and dark in America so it’s such a contrast of a podcast. Thanks Joe and Matt for spreading awareness ❤
@darkerthanblack64135 ай бұрын
I love how honest matt walsh is
@jessm86965 ай бұрын
It’s so refreshing
@bradgilbert67185 ай бұрын
Just a few minutes in and I love that he calls him Bruce.
@celebritarian5 ай бұрын
@@bradgilbert6718did Matt call Joe Bruce, or the other way around? I didn’t catch that.
@AlexStein-q3d5 ай бұрын
@@celebritarianhe called caytlin Jenner Bruce 😂
@Orangeisactually5 ай бұрын
@@AlexStein-q3dbased Matt
@Flavorful_Chunt5 ай бұрын
The more sense that Matt makes, the deeper Joe has to spin some hypothetical that represents a tiny insignificant minority. This is the most obnoxiously bleeding heart Joe has ever been. I’m shocked he didn’t start crying.
@caseyjudson10625 ай бұрын
no, I don’t see this happening at all.
@tomservo56075 ай бұрын
You have to remember Joe is a Progressive, a huge Bernie Saunders supporter.
@retiredjournalist11105 ай бұрын
Now draw the parallels to te COVID vaccines - no long term studies, don’t ask questions, you’re either on the right side or the wrong side
@retiredjournalist11105 ай бұрын
Great interview! “six genders and no personality” 😂
@levi54595 ай бұрын
I started crying
@jakobiner60835 ай бұрын
Matt walsh is great!
@jeffbraun50043 ай бұрын
It is funny how I agree with Matt Walsh on his "What is a woman" piece, but I don't agree on his marriage stance. Great discussion :D
@A.E.Shepherd5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for giving Matt Walsh a voice! This is pivotal to break this spirit on world. It's helping us stop the tailspin we're in.
@networth005 ай бұрын
A marriage is a RELIGIOUS thing and should be done in a church WITHOUT government involvement. There should be NO license to get, no lawyer when you get "divorced". Hire a lawyer if you have kids and cannot settle things when you split. Why do gay people want a religious ceremony?
@ellenwelch82675 ай бұрын
@networth00 EXACTLY!!!
@durangojoe11235 ай бұрын
It's coercion and appropriation. "He who controls the language, controls the Masses".
@davidcorreia39015 ай бұрын
@TotalViolence-sw1bo which according to doctrine, is immoral. A priest makes an oath to God. If that God says, "no man (woman) may lay together as man (woman) than that pastor/priest is NOT honoring their oath. Outside of forcing a church to preform these acts.... it's nobody's business whom you marry.
@kabtheslab5 ай бұрын
No, it isn't. The history of marriage extends far beyond religious ceremony.
@thomascolbert26875 ай бұрын
@@kabtheslab You do know that humans have always had religious ceremony? Even Neanderthals and Cro-magnons left evidence of religious funerals. No doubt they had religion in their bonding as well.
@Tizniz5 ай бұрын
So glad to see Matt on the biggest podcast on earth!
@sharonrose621024 күн бұрын
Great job Matt Walsh! Man that was intense questioning 😂 both of you, great job. 2:59:40
@THEORIGINALBIGKAHUNA5 ай бұрын
It’s damaging to the institution, not the individual. Civil Unions and Marriage - 2 different things that can coexist
@jimferris94475 ай бұрын
Joe gets hung up on that topic in an attempt to be compassionate. Someone like Matt Walsh or myself see marriage as exclusively a sacrament between one man and one woman. Someone may be attracted to or love another of the same sex, but no bond between them is a Holy Sacrament of Marriage.
@shyloevans92415 ай бұрын
Then you are arguing semantics
@THEORIGINALBIGKAHUNA5 ай бұрын
@@shyloevans9241 no.
@reubenoakley58875 ай бұрын
Civil unions were always a trojan horse
@matthewabln69895 ай бұрын
@@shyloevans9241Changing the definition of marriage to assuage sodomites is a semantic argument. Sexual deviants can and could file government paperwork for civil unions. Hijacking marriage as an institution was the point. Look around you, the same fluid, subjective thought process has rotted other normal institutions. I refer you back to the initial discussion on gender.
@northshore10005 ай бұрын
Joe: A gay marriage doesn’t hurt a straight marriage or straight marriages. It hurts society at large. Marriage expanded to people of the same sex then opens marriage up to whatever anyone wants. And a critical, historical institution loses its foundational purpose. The institution is a whole different thing.
@myriamsy74 ай бұрын
Parfaitement résumé 👍👏🙏
@KaronaG4 ай бұрын
Very small minded thinkers flooding this podcast's comments, eh? lol
@orderfirst89075 ай бұрын
I went into my local supermarket. I asked. "What is a shopping cart?" The other shoppers became triggered and started screaming at me. I had to leave. The shopping carts in the parking lot started chasing after me. I have been stalked by shopping carts ever since. Thanks, Matt Walsh.
@benfaubion5 ай бұрын
Just don't ask "what is a hotdog" you will be sued left and right by the food manufactures.
@dr.dawna.lancaster6385 ай бұрын
@@benfaubion Or what is peanut butter... that could get you FDA censure.
@teslainvestor17434 ай бұрын
Matt is so calm even though Joe barley lets him speak. Great show
@georgewashington8955 ай бұрын
1.3k 7 days. They are trying to withhold this gem from the masses
@freetobeabigot5 ай бұрын
It doesn't show up at the top of the page. I had to search for It.
@michael54325 ай бұрын
It's because youtube unbanned a bunch of these older videos and put them back online.
@Skulldugger_Mike5 ай бұрын
@@michael5432 and u have the facts for that?
@Skulldugger_Mike5 ай бұрын
like can we stop repeat this...be glad its on YT and spotify
@freetobeabigot5 ай бұрын
@@Skulldugger_Mike what?
@jenmon84595 ай бұрын
Joe and Matt are two of my favorites! ❤
@drnealsworld15 ай бұрын
best calm debate ever. tone was perfect 👌
@SVW19765 ай бұрын
I watched a conversation between 2 people. The debates over Joe.
@KellyNora-p8q5 ай бұрын
They agree.
@kaylaashley209121 күн бұрын
I'm just saying I never wanted kids so wasn't trying, ended up having one, and I now want an army of them. I don't know what happened but the bond I felt was unlike anything I've ever felt before. I also do believe some people just aren't meant to be parents. If you don't feel that bond the moment that child hits your chest you don't need that child or at least not until you speak to someone to make sure you are mentally fit, maybe you just have postpartum and that's perfectly okay but get help for it, please. These babies are precious and make your life so much more interesting and worth fighting for!
@williamconn12595 ай бұрын
I'm on Matt Walsh's side.
@tykeabad94483 ай бұрын
me too
@ginger70984 ай бұрын
OMG! Joe Rogan, giving new meaning to the word obtuse. I don’t even agree with Matt Walsh on this issue, but how can you not see that he is talking about the cultural impact, not how it affects his own marriage?!?!
@FlorentinaBray4 ай бұрын
Yea obviously, but Rogan is arguing the point that not everyone has to see everything the same.. because how how people that get married but cannot conceive.. so their marriage then also becomes pointless? Even Abraham in the bible had a hard time conceiving with his wife.. but their marriage wasn’t irrelevant…
@robj25834 ай бұрын
What is the cultural impact of allowing gay people to marry? In your opinion
@ChrisWhite.fishing4 ай бұрын
Rogan is looking at MICRO level, making up some hypothetical "what if cases", that represent 0.0000001% of society, when Walsh is talking about fundamentals at MACRO level. Redefining fundamentals (like marriage), which are foundational for, clearly decaying society, because of that, by pondering to some miniscule population of sexual deviants is clear sign of shallow and hedonically dogmatic blindness.
@Neelinmact4 ай бұрын
Well can’t you see that Joe rogan is talking about impact on individual because of how there sexuality and love is being denied through ultra conservative values
@27manduh3 ай бұрын
@@Neelinmactexcept no one is denying their sexuality or love, just refusing their insanity. If they don't want folks talking about it, then why are they doing everything they can to make folks talk about it?
@LaoWatsonSmith5 ай бұрын
5000 views in 10 days. Nice suppression YT I appreciate it's an old drop. Other old drops from the same day are pushing 500k already
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
Maybe no one feels like throwing up their last meal.
@whitway125 ай бұрын
No, this is purposeful, the current administration has weaponized the FBI and the DOJ to police and censor free speech - there was a senate hearing in which it was made evident that at one point there were not only ex FBI members working for Twitter, the FBI was spending a staggering amount of time in their offices. Why? It wasn’t for a field trip that’s for sure.
@user-bj1mx2ip1c5 ай бұрын
@@TheFloridaBroChrist is king
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@@user-bj1mx2ip1c maybe, but a dead one.
@TheFloridaBro5 ай бұрын
@user-bj1mx2ip1c lol who deleted my comment? Yall get your feelings hurt when people challenge your opinions? Let's try it nicer for your tummy. He can be a king all day, but it doesn't matter if he isn't alive anymore.
@chrisfitzpatrick91083 ай бұрын
I was a foster kid from the day I was born. It doesn't happen at 11. Thumble Skinhead is the king of bringing up non sequitors and then ranting so that by the time his pot hole shuts, it's hard to address the initial point.
@SancLunatic5 ай бұрын
The debate on marriage was really good. Its one of the rare debates where even though I may agree a little more with one side, both Joe and Matt articulated their arguments well.
@ccoddington4 ай бұрын
Seemed like Joe tried to steamroll him at certain points but Matt showed great patience.
@JohnnyPiper5 ай бұрын
Matt has really grown in the last 5 years. I now appreciate him so much. Joe, I believe that you are an important PLATFORM, and I thank you so much.
@Factrillion4 ай бұрын
This is the first ever JRE episode I have seen whole. Both were calm and respectful despite having a major disagreement. Well done.
@erinsnider76417 күн бұрын
Joe did a brilliant job in the marriage conversation 👏👏👏