Johhny Depp trial: Witness booted off stand during testimony | LiveNOW from FOX

Gina Deuters, whose husband works for Depp, told jurors in a Virginia courtroom that Heard and her friends appeared to be having “a wonderful time” and offered her the pill.
But her testimony was cut shortly after she admitted she had watched part of the trial before taking the stand.
The judge abruptly dismissed her from the witness box and told the jury to disregard her testimony entirely.
Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! kzbin.info?su...
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox.com/
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.

[@ForTheOmnissiah]

If Heard doesn't lose all her roles for what she has done, the double standards in our culture are too far gone to be repairable.

[@burn_learnearn_welding7101]

She won't all she has to do is gobble some jiblits and she can keep her roles.

[@supaslime2938]

@@burn_learnearn_welding7101 😂😂 👏🏽😂Jiblets

[@afrosworld1796]

@@burn_learnearn_welding7101 i dont know if she will ever be an A-listed actress again maybe one or two more big movie because of some contract bs but after that she will probbaly be just another pretty face that any actress could play in mid to low end movies like Megan fox. i take that back im sure she can be an A llisted actress...….on the hub or onlyfans with her great ti.. I mean teeth in all lol. i can hear it now " yo have you heard that heard has an onlyfans now".

[@jennifergabbard2773]

Completely agree.

[@Cloudminster]

So you think this trial will be that tipping point?! 😂… Hilarious. Let’s not mention what your nation has done outside the USA or the mass of hypocrisy that’s happened over the years…it all rests on this celebrity trial 😂

[@rocket_turtle7494]

This judge has so much patience given the circus her courtroom is turning into

[@vanhattfield8292]

She is the one allowing it to be that way. she is 100% responsponsible.

[@arakano]

@@vanhattfield8292 Well, maybe 90%.

[@halibut1249]

The concierge guy Romero prob pushed it the most. He's driving his van while testifying in a big court case. Is that considered texting and driving? Probably. He's gotta take his eye off the road.

[@defeatSpace]

@@vanhattfield8292 the case is a result of absurd actions, the courtroom has been a circus from the start and it can only be a circus by the nature of this case

[@Vera-xu3xw]

Wtf else does she have to do 🤣

[@kylesharby4025]

*For those with questions: Yes this was Johnny's friend and an immensely important person for his side. In the court was Eve (journalist and Amber's girlfriend) who illegally doctored a photo of an old social media post to make it look current and showed it to Amber's attorneys in an attempt to get her kicked from the courtroom. It was successful because John's friend is honest about seeing a few clips since it's everywhere. However, this is before the judge found out of the doctored photo used by Amber's team, and Eve was also kicked from the courtroom barred from return.*

[@ashleighmackenzie8670]

Wow thank you so much, appreciate you explaining mate. She’s British, we tell the truth under oath. Such a shame for johnnys side.

[@reneestewart9425]

Why do you think the main stream news only reports positive for Amber and always leave out sentences here and there that’s very important to Johnnys innocence and reputation. His reputation why is the main stream news still contributing to that????

[@therealbabytooth]

Weren't the clips she saw from the uk trial?

[@hylogibbon]

@@reneestewart9425 I don't believe that is true. I've seen mainstream news show good and bad from each point of view for this trial. And I haven't seen too much taken out of context. I;m not sure what news you're referring to.

[@JadesOfGrey]

Can you link to a video or article that talks about the doctored photo? I don’t see it anywhere

[@Hokutenyu]

Lets get real. Which witness hasn't watched TV and clips of the testimony? She is probably the most honest of them all for admitting it

[@OdaiNekromos]

jeah it's funny that they film and stream it, it gets blown up everywhere and then you are forced to go out of your way to ignore all of it, lock yourself if a bunker and wait? xD

[@InsaneTriller93_]

If you have been called to testify its done before any of the trial starts to ensure that they make sure they don't watch any of the footage, Not really hard to stay away from something that you are going to be apart off its like all your friends know about the surprise birthday party they have set up for you not knowing you already KNOW ABOUT IT nobody is suppose to tell you and you ain't suppose to know literal simple facts. If you are testifying in a court and you know you're going to get that time don't tune into it it aint that hard to refreash the YT page or change the channel...

[@EdgePitSwing]

@@OdaiNekromos Locking yourself in a bunker is not the same as not clicking on a link to a video. lol

[@OdaiNekromos]

@@EdgePitSwing but you know how other people are: "have you seen this, nevermind i tell you anyway" xD also was mainly just joking ;D

[@freshair4306]

They all watched it, she was just beeing honest

[@amandashare1281]

I could never understand why Johnny Depp lost all of his film roles because of this trial but Heard was allowed to keep hers. If its right for one then it should be right for both. Problem is a man has a bigger problem proving domestic abuse against a woman!

[@IlDeimos]

Because its Hollywood. Hollywood is filled with liberals that take a woman's word as fact, and assume she is telling the truth, and always assume the Man is lying. Disney especially, they are as far left as you can get. In their eyes, Women can do no wrong, and all men are bad. Its sad. Don't get me wrong, Johnny is also a liberal, and I don't agree with his politics either. But what they are trying to do to him is wrong, and I never want to see him lose his career, even if I don't agree with his politics. He is a great actor, he made Disney billions. The pirates movies would of never made as much as they did without Johnny. I hope he also goes and sues Disney.

[@amandashare1281]

@@IlDeimos Unfortunately I think you are right!

[@PennywiseTheDancingClown274]

Some feminist protest men help groups for these kind of situations Edit I should change some to fake

[@mtngrl5859]

She won the UK court case that's why. It's likely the bar was different there or the term abuse more encompassing.

[@Detroit_Dawg]

Because in the previous trial, the judge ruled in favor of Amber Heard and he lost his case.

[@makaylahollywood3677]

If Johnny doesn't win this case- our society's trust will be weakened..people deserve to live in peace without false accusations and crap lawyers dismissing cruelty. I don't care for the judge.

[@edsloan8535]

Wait till they spend enough time together for that time of the month to align with one another.

[@dbj1852]

The judge is doing a good job she can’t in good faith allow that persons testimony to stand since she violated the rules. The judge has to overthrow it.

[@apapz3245]

Well it’s all hearsay, you can’t use hearsay in court, so that’s one thing

[@AlertPhase0]

Big no no to watch testimony and give it. Judge was right.

[@joeyricefried9621]

It’s Hollywood. Calm down

[@roberttrout1352]

If he loses this case it's because people purposely ignored evidence and didn't want to hear or accept the truth.

[@apapz3245]

It’s all hearsay, you can’t accept hearsay as evidence in court

[@CanadaBoyRocks66]

If Johnny loses this will mean the end of mens lives because all women will say he raped and beat me then we men get are lives ruined

[@TheGreatGadfly]

Agreed. Neither are people I would aspire children to idolize, but she is clearly at fault in this case.

[@carladombroski1638]

“She was clearly at fault”, are you joking?? It takes two people and he has displayed plenty of narcissistic behavior. They know how to push each other’s buttons and are doing it in front of the whole world.

[@CanadaBoyRocks66]

@@carladombroski1638 women always lie about being raped and beaten so JD is innocent

[@hockeygoon8649]

The way the lawyers on amber side are trying so hard to silence people says alot about their client

[@Nator316]

No actually it makes them look immature and aggressive, Not because you can Object, Hearsay means you have to actually do that for everything.

[@rekcusdoo]

If she watched the trial, she should should not be giving testimony as it can't be trusted to be accurate.

[@rekcusdoo]

@@Nator316 - That's a silly statement. The lawyers are there to make sure the other side obeys the rules. Hearsay does not obey the rules.

[@Bollibompa]

@@rekcusdoo Schhh... You can't be reasonable against total ignorance.

[@Carts45]

@@rekcusdoo if you actually look at both the lawyers on Heards side an the reviews of there firms. Youd know that theyre both from low reviewed firms meaning there not good people or good lawyers lol. To them everything is hearsay INCLUDING there own questions lol.

[@jennifergabbard2773]

I'm with Johnny on this one .Amber Heard is vicious and she's crazy.

[@iffybaker5013]

Who knows, we WERENT THERE!

[@jennifergabbard2773]

@@iffybaker5013 you don't have to be there Amber Heard has a reputation that precedes her

[@anonymouslee8287]

@@jennifergabbard2773 Who daughter is this? Du pont, Chrysler, Heinz, Trump...

[@jennifergabbard2773]

@@anonymouslee8287 😄😄😄

[@markee063]

She reminds me of my 2nd x wife. She was so mean-ass crazy the judge saw clean through her. I got the kids. She can have the f*ck'n house.

[@avzeolla3960]

In this day and age of the internet, fair and impartial juries and unbiased witnesses are harder and harder to come by.

[@CodCats]

yes, imagine you were falsely accused of rape and the girl had a good scheme, would you trust 10 random americans, i'd be pretty nervous

[@helloworld2784]

I like her.. she was honest and stands for Johnny. Was excused after Amber's team showed a misleading screenshot from an old Instagram post.

[@alwaysyouramanda]

Their “peers” especially-! They google themselves daily!

[@draculathevampire934]

They probably get paid

[@jakebrandt5882]

@@draculathevampire934 every juror in every court in this country gets paid. That's literally how it works.

[@UncleDaniel]

lol the fact she admited so easily she watched it online, just shows the women is honest

[@jonathanlgill]

She's under oath. She's not supposed to be dishonest.

[@cc-vv8pf]

That doesn’t mean anything. So many people lie. Wake up!

[@HeyNana777]

@@cc-vv8pf Exactly, there’s typically always someone lying in court anyway considering one side is saying something is true and the other side is saying it’s false. So not sure why they think being under oath has ever made lying non-existent. Being under oath means nothing if no one will be able to prove you lied anyway. She could’ve easily denied it and she didn’t. A liar would’ve for sure.

[@martinliu5480]

@@cc-vv8pf That would be perjury, the consequences would be prison sentence if you're found out so it's probably best if you are honest.

[@cc-vv8pf]

@@martinliu5480 literally no one gives a crap about the oath.

[@adrijonorge9816]

"Tell the world, Johnny, tell them, 'Johnny Depp, I, a man, I'm a victim too of domestic violence'. And see how many people believe or side with you" .

[@marysalvi242]

@Adrijo norge sorry for your pain and the added burden of the myth that males cannot be abused and any and all ways. You say you "are" in that your still in the relationship & you don't have to answer because it more of, yeah, for many of us it takes getting outside help, so no judging here, I promise. Either way I hope you are safe, hope it is in the past and just giving tip, trust your own feelings in any situation. Wishing you happiness from this moment on..take care ~ Many knew Johnny was the abused one. He needs to follow up with getting professional help to guide him to balance his own actions: he's very kind person and I understand it's easier for some of us to develop into that side to maneuver through childhood environment & turn the suppressed emotions into self-destructive ways; makes sense to dull the hurt and also the fear of releasing emotions. In my first session, "but what if I get angry and start smashing stuff." I knew I had a lot inside. I'm now 73yrs old, doing okay. Oh and no I never did smash thing in my docs office. ~ ☮

[@barry3839]

Screw Johnny Depp, hope he loses.

[@AliCat1912]

That is perhaps the most damning and telling words she has uttered in all of this.

[@jennifergabbard2773]

It's refreshing to see a man actually have the backbone to come forward and call out domestic violence on them. It's not just women who get abused, plenty of men do and they're just too embarrassed to come forward. So good for you Johnny Depp.

[@helenjob]

We do now!

[@raymondchapman5990]

It's disgusting that Ambers legal team falsely cropped a 2 year old tweet photo and used it in court to get Dueters kicked. It is proven they lied but regardless the judge asked her if she watched any and she said yes...clips. So if Dueters had said no I think Ambers legal team would have really f'd up and I'm so disappointed Dueters said she seen clips...but at the same time it proves she is an honest person. They may have stricken her testimony but the jury heard it. I cannot believe all the court did was just kick that asshole Barlow out...there should've been some contempt charges. I just have a funny feeling Johnny will still lose this case and I do so because the way the judge seems to allow Ambers team to get away with shitty treatment of the witnesses and this sneaky fake tweet bs they did. Amber Heard is a disgusting, lying, manipulative piece of sh** !

[@youniverse6841]

Not all is bad. By doing so, they also exposed the honesty from Depp's side versus how far Amber's team would go to make Depp's team look bad. Lies and more lies. Clearly, someone is DESPERATE!!!!

[@youniverse6841]

But I agree too. That judge is biased af. I can't stand her.

[@adelgado8917]

Nah he's got more creditable witnesses than her and even people who had worked for amber talked nothing but negative things about her, doctors issued statements and more. He's going to win.

[@asj3488]

He's not gonna lose at all.

[@asj3488]

@@youniverse6841 amber has no witnesses. Nothing. She's been caught in so many lies under oath by this judge. Are you even watching repatable news or live feeds??? Seriously. The judge isn't dealing with B's though. Or making it where amber can contest her ruling at any point. This judge has shot down 99 percent of ambers awful dumb lawyers objects and even has asked. How do you know that he hasn't said anything yet or finished his sentence. She literally has made a fool of ambers lawyers it's beyond amusing. There's no way she's winning. She's not favoring amber either

[@SavageFrenchies]

This trial is going to wreck Ambers career. If he actually wins which he should she will be unemployable. The risk of her getting a role in a movie will be to much. So she will lose 50 mill probably what she is worth and she won’t get roles in movies. She basically has destroyed her entire life thanks the her narcissism and the need to smear this kind man. She’s just like my ex it’s sad to see him go through this knowing exactly how he was treated and how amazing he treated her. He just got to the point he couldn’t take it I don’t blame him for getting angry at times.

[@shredx81]

She’s worth $8M.

[@hotcrazycatladyme168]

Amber Heards net worth is like 2 million, not 50 million. She can't even afford to pay the 1.5 million she owes the ACLU for her divorce settlement. Elon had to pay half a million for her, among others. She's broke. Johnny won't get any actual money out of this, but he will get his reputation repaired hopefully, so that's something. 50 million? HA HA HA. She's a horrible actress. She's not A list. Never has been.

[@xaf0163]

the cruel reality of it all is, she will make out just find, and will probably be employed again. johnny’s roles were dropped immediately the second that snake opened her mouth, but she’s still landing roles in the midst of all this. even if she loses, her life will be fine

[@glorioskey]

I can see quite a few people would boycott any future movies of hers.

[@lindahollingsworth2567]

She isn't worth anywhere near 50 million.

[@jaym3566]

AH's team with the help of Eve Barlow, journalist and current girlfriend of Amber, doctored an IG post of Gina's from 2021 to make it seem current. They committed FRAUD against the court by doing this. They set Gina up and she is honest so admitted to watching clips. She was rightfully dismissed for this. But it doesn't excuse what AH's team did. Eve was also live tweeting from the courtroom, passing notes, etc. The judge was not happy and banned Eve Barlow from the courtroom for the rest of the trial. She thought she was part of the legal team because the lawyers said she was. Even tried to say she's not really a journalist which is verifiable BS. This went very bad for AH's team.

[@DirtyLifeLove]

Thanks

[@lindakay1700]

They should allow Ginger back to testify!! This is horrible that amber gets away with FRAUD 😡

[@ayeshiajackson7364]

I have a question.. Is it possible that Johnny's lawyers can bring this up when they verify it was fraudulent to the judge or will the judge hear nothing of it? OR ...IF AH wins can there be another trial once the court DO find out it was fraudulent?

[@jaym3566]

@@ayeshiajackson7364 They did bring it up and Eve Barlow was banned from the courtroom for the rest of the trial. Things like this can create cause for appeal, but it's hard to say as of now.

[@Steger13]

Yes and now she is ban from the cort haha

[@justlucky8254]

Judge: Does anybody have any follow up questions? Lawyer begins a question. Judge says "doesn't matter ".

[@benzirzow3994]

Lmao I know, that made me laugh so hard

[@helloworld2784]

That's not the type of question she was expecting, since that's already been answered.

[@warden_is_better32]

You must not be a good listener.

[@juliannedispain1637]

AH's friend was using her cell phone during the proceedings too. Should focus on that part as well. I am siding with Johnny Depp.

[@Steger13]

Yes and give the judge misleading Twitter twit and made her thing it was twitted a few days ago when it was a twit from the UK trial

[@jjuglimu8876]

The judge is doing a great job! She’s calm and very patient with everything that’s going on and e with these lawyers always objecting every minute it seems like!! Oh man can you imagine if it was Judge Judy!!😳😬😬

[@anotheryoutube4635]

This judge is a joke.

[@austinweathermon5117]

You have no idea how much I wish this was on judge Judy. The damn thing would have been well and over with 😂🤣😂

[@anotheryoutube4635]

@@user-fu9dd5vc6x Clearly you've not watched any of this trial because that's all this judge does with objections.

[@xXCybranXx]

How did this judge become a judge

[@dbgreene9020]

The judge has no idea what she's doing

[@HKragh]

In my opinion every witness should be asked this question, and then only the ones who deny having watched clips of this, will be dismissed. To me it feels like current procedure is a filter that promotes dishonesty

[@ilikebacon.6483]

When Johnny wins the case he's gotta turn to Amber Heard's whole legal team and say "This is the day you will always remember as the day you almost caught Captain Jack Sparrow"

[@nickhufflepuff9604]

This is the day you almost didn’t have to pay Captain Jack Sparrows legal fees.

[@missyidontgiveacrap9939]

Almost “caught”? What?

[@beepboop5491]

😂😭 Oh that would tickle me like nothing else could, he wouldn't say it but it sure as hell would be amazing

[@tedlaporte2001]

Ok, ok.... Now that's a good 1😎

[@vaalak.4245]

Copied someone else's comment I see

[@iuyklklk4165]

Can I ask, if this lady was asked to leave because she had seen the trial online, when then was the ex employee from tmz allowed to testify having also admitted to seeing the trial?

[@katiemurray48]

I think rebuttal witness have a different standard of rules because they weren’t instructed to not watch the trial and are coming in for impeachment

[@viccccccc9947]

He was called as a rebuttal witness, meaning he didn’t know he would take the stand before recently. Once he was contacted by the lawyers he was advised not to watch any of the trial

[@pattybowden506]

@@viccccccc9947 actually He contacted Camille. But you are right about him not knowing he would be testifying. Only after he saw what was being said about TMZ did he make that call.

[@cosmicdreamer1387]

But I thought he said he was there in person sat in the gallery

[@iuyklklk4165]

@@viccccccc9947 oh I see. Thanks for replying.

[@blessedbee186]

They are reminded several times to NOT look at the trial or anything related!

[@silverkitty2503]

these people do not seem the brightest

[@silverkitty2503]

@Joshua Illingworth witnesses

[@michaeleverest3487]

She didn't. The defense team presented an image to the judge that turned out to be manipulated by the Amber Heards friend. The judge found out a day later and barred Amber Heard's friend from the court. Get your facts right!

[@milesfargo5714]

it was proven it was about the trial in uk in 2021 they hid the time and date on the post rofl.

[@petekdemircioglu]

If they still are doing it Thats a statement about not being burdened by laws. Like their sociopath golddigger friend. Soulmates.

[@Americanwomancirca1969]

My heart just aches for Johnny Depp!!! Praying that he wins this case!

[@EbonyJ-rt5bb]

💯💪🏽

[@dbabini1]

Depp is not a victim, he participated in all the debauchery and shamelessness right alongside his dancing partner AH.

[@frenchfries6631]

@@rah2209 how do know?

[@justme9723]

@@rah2209 she abused him first. It took a lot from JD if he hit her back. I mean how much can you take ?

[@remnantstudio]

@@rah2209 Yea, provoke and manipulate him enough to do (Even though he controlled himself I believe) and then say "They're both guilty of abusing each other". You sick puppets of that witch literally baffle me.

[@suziewhattley3917]

A tiny victory for Amber's side, but that short haired blonde attorney was so excited she was yipping like a terrier. The judge had to tell her "I heard it the first time". Amber's team are like a mixture of toddlers, mean girls, and the sneaky boys who spike drinks.

[@indiecindy3053]

Rule 615 of “federal rules of evidence” means the witness may be excluded for having watched any trial testimony. It would give a witness an unfair advantage to know what was already said in court so they can adjust their testimony. Whether a witness would adjust their testimony or not or whether they heard just a little bit or not are both irrelevant because it’s the fact that they heard anything submitted to the court during the trial. If an attorney is looking to get damning evidence from witness thrown out of trial, they will look for ANYTHING to strike that witnesses testimony from the record. That way the jury doesn’t hear evidence that could destroy their defense. So yeah, that was dumb on her part, she screwed up and that’s evidence the jury won’t get to hear. Juries don’t always get to hear ALL the evidence… only the evidence that fits within the “rules.”

[@knightartorias1825]

This is in the Fairfax County Circuit Court, not federal court. They will be using Virginia's rules of evidence, not the feds'.

[@Mr25thfret]

Not dumb on her part. Totally dumb on Johnny's lawyer! He has also let so many objections float by it's ridiculous.

[@justlucky8254]

Crazy how that works, especially in this Era of information. Whats the difference between watching a show, reading an article or just conversing with a friend or stranger who disseminates the same info? Until court proceedings are concealed until conclusion, people will always hear this, that or the other by some means.

[@TheMarcosmdu]

Thank you for the information, I didn't understand what had happened and since I don't know your rules or those rules in particular, I needed an explanation like this. thank you!!

[@knightartorias1825]

@@TheMarcosmdu FEDERAL COURT RULES DO NOT APPLY IN STATE COURT PROCEDURE.

[@SurplusMarket]

I don’t understand…why broadcast the trial like some kind of reality TV show if you don’t want potential witnesses to watch it?

[@saritatambayong4002]

Yeah. I mean I get the jury have to get no outside influences. But witnesses just to have answer questions according what they see and heard. It shouldn't mattered if they already formed an opinion that Amber's defense team are silly, or that last witness the doorman is adorable, etc.

[@alexgall8785]

Every time session ends Judge asks everyone not too tune in to anything pertaining too the trial. Then why broadcast it everywhere.

[@irok2017]

There's a lot of speculation that the main reason for this trial is so Johnny can clear his name and expose amber heard. If the trial wasn't public, we wouldn't be able to see what's going on, we'd only see the outcome. Having it publicized ensures the public sees what Amber has done

[@beachstreet101]

The judge tells you not to watch anything on the trial. It’s expected that these adults can follow simple rules and control themselves and not watch. It’s not that difficult. I know a lot of people that haven’t watched this trial. They’ve heard of it and are aware it’s on but they’re not tuning in.

[@pathetic2399]

Exactly. This shits everywhere. Hard to avoid if you’re using the Internet

[@CodeMonkeX]

So every witness that has watched a clip of the trial is not allowed to testify? That seems like this will be a short case.

[@ofidiotabagista5259]

That's a weird situation considering the trial is being broadcast and KZbin is suggesting clips all the time.

[@michaelkorody6159]

@@ofidiotabagista5259 probably because you, me and many others are all getting the same clips bc we keep watching all these vids ab the case haha

[@rekcusdoo]

It depends on the type of witness. An expert probably wouldn't be excused, but a character witness or witness to the events definitely would as they can tailor their testimony to match previous witnesses.

[@rekcusdoo]

@@ofidiotabagista5259 - She was probably told she isn't allowed to watch the trial until she testifies. She obviously didn't care.

[@th-sd6ni]

@@rekcusdoo yes, she was stupid af.....i have no doubt in my mind someone (probably one of jd's lawyers) already told her ahead of time

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

Johnny is winning in spite of loosing this witness. It's so sad that people are literally paying money to destroy another human being. This case hits close for me. I have lost my so called family and friends because of lies told by my sister when my mother died. Sadder still, I don't have the money to fight it and win back everything she took. However, I'm going to try anyway.

[@APC629]

Stay strong, brother

[@_garebear]

*losing

[@APC629]

@@_garebear I respect the hustle for correcting one's mistake but let the man have this one, ya ass.

[@private4720]

Good luck, best wishes to you. Keep your head up. Whats done in the dark always comes to light! She will get hers

[@g.w.hampton5525]

Ok now that you mention it... I went through the same thing when my parents (married for over 60 years) died within months of each other and my half-siblings, nieces, and nephews (my mother's previous marriage) conspired to ruin me out of jealousy. I was the only living child of my father and inherited because of that and while they were financially compensated ( my snake of a half-sister got 100k off the top) even though they completely ignored my parents when they fell ill and were failing they couldn't stand it that once again due to my love for my parents and kind nature (I took care of both of them while working full time) I inherited the house and property where I grew up.... Just because you're related doesn't make you family and I learned that the hard way. Blessings to you and I hope things turn around for you. 💓

[@Edith1517]

In my opinion Johnny already won because he has shown whether they are both wrong, that Amber is an aggressor and a liar. She tried to benefit from a profile as domestic abuse survivor championing for women. She was envious of his career and tried to destroy his career indirectly by not naming him the in article. She will not be seen the same way. He is taking her down with him. He is going to clear his name to a degree. We know the public decides to support a celebrity or not. Amber hopefully will be cancelled as she tried to erase Johnny.

[@danielbianchi3479]

Screw Amber, very crazy & jealous of Johns success!

[@flappdabass5329]

Hopefully cancelled? F you and your cancel culture.

[@TonyMontana-ip5dn]

We support JD period man is not the abuser period she is so what he smokes weed drinks and does cocaine time to time dont we all

[@imagewavesurfphoto4567]

I had Mirtza once. I think there’s a cream you can use for that now. Clears it right up.

[@W47689]

@@TonyMontana-ip5dn you got that right scarface 🤝🤝

[@jravell]

I have a couple of questions. Why was that front part repeated? And how is the jury expected to unhear something just because it’s struck from the record?

[@Caitlin1928]

They can't unhear it, but they're just supposed to not take it into account at the end of the trial.

[@lliamdavis6950]

to make the video longer as to make it more appealing to the youtube algorithms is my guess.

[@midsummersnight3848]

They won't! So dumb. They're supposed to pretend they didn't, but theyre human. Also, having it struck from the record benefits just incase their is a mistrial/retrial and they have to go back and look at the text/dialogue of what was said. But yeah, i totally agree with you.

[@judechauhan6715]

Not unhear it but not use it as part of their verdict or justification for their decision.

[@drvelocci]

@@midsummersnight3848 i believe it will still show on the courts version of the record, but the text will have the strike through font, hence the name

[@raquelb731]

He still has that lie about that makeup she was using in 2015-16! She said she had to carry it in her purse at all times because of bruises. The makeup co, said that particular line wasn’t even released until 2017 December at that. Statement from an employee Friday via social media. With adds showing release date. I pray that comes back to her. Zero credibility.

[@leahhuntz6236]

Surely the lawyers wld know about this by now? It basically throws her entire story out the window..even further

[@chamelxon]

@@leahhuntz6236 someone actually met up with his lawyers to tell them about the makeup thing so they know about it now

[@mollymarie5472]

Right!!!

[@helloworld2784]

@@chamelxon How did you know? Where can I read this?

[@chamelxon]

@@helloworld2784 someone on tiktok

[@jaredgambeski2991]

the judge here isnt upset with the witness but actually furious at Ambers legal team as a whole. This is basic law and even for an undergrad, ESPECIALLY when claiming someone a "key witness" to your defense. Theres NO way this question was not asked regularly by her team. They are either that negligent or attempting to make a witness without disclosing this. Shady by the whole team with a complete disregard for due process. Judge wasnt having any of it

[@nw6070]

All these rules are pathetic . She could have lied and said she hadn’t watched and all would be fine ? Law system is a joke . Should be based on factors of reason and logic not on what a witness claims . It should be taken for granted anyone may have watched prior testimonies therefore it’s an obsolete factor.

[@paracosm-cc]

@@nw6070 i think at that point she is still under oath so if she lied and they found out she would be in big legal trouble

[@KimmieWrangler]

From what I’ve seen on Court tv & a lot of other media is that Ambers friend that was sitting right behind her legal team, was on her phone when she should not have been & looked up that witnesses profile & seen a tweet that she put out & showed it to Ambers lawyers sitting in front of her! The tweet was about Johnny & Ambers court case from 2021! BUT the defense did not check that part out & showed the judge the tweet & that’s when the judge asked the witness that question! After she was thrown out, the Prosecution team looked it up & seen that it was in fact from the past trial & they showed the judge & she then threw Ambers friend out of the court precedents & scolded the defense team! But of course the jury doesn’t know this & they just know what they saw & that was a key witness of Johnnys being dismissed for watching stuff on the internet!

[@amywilkins543]

She looked furious

[@joannt2298]

I’m confused at your comment, wasn’t this witness called by the plaintiff’s (JD) team?

[@KimmieWrangler]

It’s pretty sad that Ambers friend even had her cellphone out when she knew better! And to show Ambers lawyers a post from 2021 & to have acted like it was from this trial just to get Johnnys witness kicked out of the court! And Ambers lawyers did not even check it out to see if it was true till Johnnys attorneys did so & by then it was to late! Reporters from Court tv that were inside the courtroom said that the judge was mad at the defense for doing that & Ambers friend was then thrown out of the courtroom & told not to return! I wished that the jury would have been in the courtroom to hear & see this!! That was a key witness for Johnny! And then she lied about the make up palette that she said she covered up her bruises with, the company named Milani put out a statement & said that they didn’t come out with that make up palette till 2017! Not 2013-2015 like Amber said! And it’s all over the media about it! But of course the jury won’t hear about it neither!

[@imagewavesurfphoto4567]

pretty sad, yes you are. you wacky obsessed Johnny fan.

[@r.assawa7840]

I'm 100% on Johny's side in this case. But to play devil advocate, the judge specifically asked her whether if she watched any witness testimony this past week, so if she did not then she should've said no, regardless of the post the defence's team show the judge ( since it's an old post from 2021).

[@eritakahashi1765]

@@r.assawa7840 yeah regardless of if Amber's side had found that post she shouldn't have testified right? Because she had seen clips. I dont know how yoy can't since it's everywhere

[@BIOL6895]

They never specifically mentioned it was the Milani brand. Likely, they just used it as a prop. Not defending Amber, just saying we can't use that as evidence that she lied or whatever.

[@eritakahashi1765]

@@BIOL6895 I think the issue is during the opening the lawyer was talking to the jury holding up the Milani compact and saying things like Amber used this product. If it's not the same they should at least say a product like this. I mean they could definitely say that's what they meant, but it's not a good look

[@kronosblade3002]

Where the bleep is Judge Judy? Have this done in less than 30 mins.

[@andrewsercer9538]

What Salsal said. Plus, Judge Judy is a small claims court Judge ... the $50 MILLION at stake in this case would exceed her jurisdiction by many many factors.

[@flolacandola9396]

Lol 😂

[@amandabuller8627]

Johnny Depp ❤💙💚💛💜💖 needs justice

[@irandude1655]

Why do they ask is she has been watching. Of course she has been watching. I have nothing to do with these people and even I have been watching . LOL

[@jadelee6555]

She was dismissed because Amber's current girlfriend Eve Barlow provided false information to Amber's legal team. She hands Rottenborn her phone with a tweet from last year and lies to them saying it was from this week.

[@wastykobbyjnrofficial]

And the legal team couldn't verify that tweet?? I mean the Date and time??

[@shirleneblok3712]

How did the judge allow Eve Barlow to pass the phone to Amber's lawyer?

[@jack7195]

Only because Eve/Eva Barlow, Amber Heards friend/girlfriend, falsified an Instagram post😂she got exiled from the court, did not paint Amber and her legal team in a good light, they're screwed even more than they were

[@erook2019]

This is all done online, everyone in that room and outside of it has seen clips of testimonies, why is that even a rule that you can't do so?

[@davidogletree1411]

If they dont "TRY THEIR BEST" to make sure the trial isnt effected by the media because then they have to restart the trial because it could be deemed unfair. Doesnt mean they were successfull.

[@toditron]

A witness cannot corroborate evidence with his/her testimony if he/she is influenced by other witness testimony. It is of course difficult to avoid catching a clip, or at least the title of a clip, if you go online at all, so it may seem overly cautious, but the court has it's procedures and will almost always err on the side of caution.

[@kirstymiller9332]

I'm just seeing this for the first time. Given future contex, I have a wow. A very sincere, honest and respectful witness. What a shame.

[@dave.willard]

So now if Depp looses this case his lawyers have an excellent case for a mistrial. LOL.

[@RandomUsername34]

If witnesses watching testimony is reason for booting the witness, then maybe they shouldn't be broadcasting this live all around the world....

[@Eskolol]

Or you simply refrain from watching or reading about the case as the judge orders to.

[@dorsia6938]

@@Eskolol it's the number one news story in the world right now. There are more people tuning into this than the fkn war in Ukraine. In a normal court case it's an easy thing to avoid but this is like saying you can go outside but you're not allowed to look at the sky.

[@jakebrandt5882]

@@Eskolol you stop it with your reasonable thoughts.

[@PlgDctr]

Uhhhmm, no? A law is a law, if AH's lawyers were interested in witness's testimony going through, they should've instructed her to NOT watch anything related to trial. If you don't want your witness to be relieved - you make sure he doesn't do something he's not supposed to do. You can't resist watching some internet clips - your testimony is getting thrown out of court. It's as simple as that. Very unprofessional or shady on AH's legal team part.

[@audreyvann5336]

Witnesses and jury members are very clearly instructed on these procedures if there is any coverage at all expected on local news, newspapers, online, etc. This is not some new, unknown, unheard of situation. Even without live coverage, high profile cases have always been covered in daily reports by reporters/media.

[@CharlotteGalashan]

Why did they ask if she’d watched any of the trial leading up to her testifying? What prompted them to ask her that. I haven’t heard them ask any other witness if they have watched or seen any other testimonies?

[@cariboucreates7988]

They pulled up an instagram post from the uk trial clipped the date out and made it seem like it was a new post. Which in my opinion is fraud upon the court or whatever it is called showing false information and they got away with it they think

[@itwasaliens]

She doctored an old social media post and showed it to Amber's attorney in an attempt to get kicked from the courtroom. It worked. Edit: It was actually her girlfriend that edited it to get her removed.

[@bonter1983]

@@itwasaliens where did you find that information?

[@itwasaliens]

@@bonter1983 just reading though other comments on here.

[@JamesKaplonek]

@@itwasaliens wrong. It was Amber's girlfriend sitting in the front benches who took the picture off Instagram, removed the date from it, and used it to get the witness removed unfairly.

[@sadrahman3242]

Look very carefully - The reason for this witness being 'booted' off the stand, was that the Heard Team illegally received a cropped information (date cropped off. Item from the London case). This information was handed to the Heard lawyers by so called lawyers team on the first row behind the wooden rails, and this person was Amber Heard's girlfriend, who twitting and using her device to upload information to social media. She was later found out and moved to the rear of the Court but then she abused her privilege by continuing to use her device to inform Social Media. Amber Heard's girlfriend was then barred by the Judge for the rest of Trial.

[@TimV777]

What was the photo about?

[@sadrahman3242]

@@TimV777 I think it was an old tweet that Gina Deuters (in the stand) sent about the trial in London but was modified with the time-stamp removed. The defense team was trying to get Johnny Depp's witness of the stand stating that she was tweeting about the case.

[@avzeolla3960]

This is very significant because moving forward opposing counsel could ask each hostile witness as the first question - Have you watched any clips? Yes? Dismissed. These are subpoenaed witnesses, not jurors. Interesting.

[@namanmahendra6596]

Could you kindly elaborate?

[@heathermiller76]

@@namanmahendra6596 apparently not, unfortunately......

[@HiddenAgendas]

the court really wants to protect amber

[@kps.77]

Perhaps with modern (not so modern it's been around 15 years) It should be part of the standard pre-questioning, to ask - have you watched, read, seen or heard any testimony regarding this trial prior to taking the stand.

[@flolacandola9396]

True

[@DiamondWhite91]

Lol it seems Amber’s defense was stalking the witness’s social media.

[@erindbs5519]

She should have called saul

[@ancient_technique]

fr

[@WendyHernandez-cc7fr]

I swear if she somehow wins this trial it's just sets a bad example of how you can get away with anything!!

[@abelis644]

Have you heard of a phat phuck named tRump who's been getting away with murder for decades?

[@geoffair6461]

The witness was hardly " booted off" the Witness stand. I do wish People who write headlines use appropriate wording.

[@jv-ep2tc]

Booted = clicks

[@peterb2272]

She was immediately 'excused' and all of of her testimony discarded. That in the ultra polite legal world was very much the equivalent of being "booted" out of court.

[@TheJeffro451]

Judge: Does anyone have any follow up questions? Lawyer: yes, have you seen… Judge Rock: it doesn’t matter what your question is!

[@n16161]

I lol’d too.

[@Pink13F]

Thank you Trevor the song and signing is nice and soothing. It's amazing how different you sound from talking you have a nice voice.

[@heidicrimmings9615]

Love for Johnny

[@taylorellison2719]

How did Elaine suddenly get wind that this person had seen things online? Why did they wait until she got on the stand?

[@wavyremix]

Amber's friend, Eve Barlow, (who is sitting in the front row of the gallery during this testimony) was looking at this witness' instagram and believed she saw a post made during this trial that referenced Johnny's legal wins on an earlier date. This would imply she had knowledge of witness testimony, which would disqualify her. The post was actually from 2021 and made during another trial, but nobody noticed apparently. Some people claim that Barlow manipulated the post somehow to hide or obscure the real date; perhaps she took a screenshot and cut the date off. Barlow immediately sent this post in a text message to Heard's attorney, after which he halted the trial. You can actually see Barlow with her head down followed by Rottenborn, Heard's attorney, checking his phone and consulting with his team in real time in this video. So the impetus for the line of questioning was based on bad facts. When this was discovered, Barlow was banned from attending any further court proceedings (the judge's order is under seal so we don't know the reason she was banned for certain, but this is likely why). Regardless, the damage was done and a very important witness for Depp's team was removed, because she ultimately messed up by watching parts of the trial online.

[@myfirstpony96]

They can strike what they want but a jury will not forget anything said objected to or asked to forget . They hear and see they won't forget just because a person says to . Lmao

[@killmonger4169]

Umm we are talking about Americans right? Lol we believe anything we’re told by people of power lol

[@myfirstpony96]

@@killmonger4169 oh jeez ! So you think all Americans are ignorant and brainless zombies? Is your name Biden or Trudeau?

[@codingvio7383]

Why can't they wait until the trial is finished to upload footage of court? Wouldn't such measures prevent any witnesses from watching trial footage and having it influence their testimony?

[@Asidebar]

witnesses are ordered by the court not to watch

[@lenafamily7730]

Thats what perjury charges are for

[@robovac3557]

It's America. They're not that smart.

[@queenofswords6463]

Exactly. And since she needs the internet to do her day job - a court trial isn’t a holiday, how do you avoid the constant bombardment of “what’s popular in the world”? I doubt she intentionally viewed clips, rather they were pushed at her by the media controlled nightmare the internet has become.

[@reaganolivia7755]

@Dracco Princes let's not say "how crazy women can be".

[@Nick-kw9oz]

This just goes to show how greasy and underhanded AH, her friends and her team is for doing something like this.

[@moderndayaphorismswithUncleRay]

In this day and age. Can you actually not be influenced in one way or the other?

[@justjulia8007]

Never mind Eve Barlow tweeting live from the courthouse with a phone she wasn’t allowed to even have, getting herself banned 🥴

[@WaldoGotchubent]

Lol she was politely excused … “booted off” … come on man

[@melonmelon7427]

Once the jury heard something they can't unhear it, no matter what they are instructed to do, struck and so on. It still remains in their memory and nobody can actually quantify how much of that was struck and didn't play a part in their decision making processes.

[@troybradley2575]

*Quantify

[@melonmelon7427]

@@troybradley2575 I have predictive text activated. Thanks for pointing it out.

[@troybradley2575]

@@melonmelon7427 No problem, I have it too and i hate it! Can’t wait to be done with iPhone

[@jocelynannmc]

@@troybradley2575 You know you can turn it off right?

[@troybradley2575]

@@jocelynannmc how

[@arunallen1277]

How on earth did the lawyers not notice the post was from 2021?? Anyway, one of their own also got dismissed, I hear, for use of mobile phone in court, so it's all equal.

[@Texas240]

It wasn't a lawyer, it was a journalist friend of Heard's who thought she was part of the legal team but was really just a spectator.

[@NightFlame89]

@@Texas240 they did. They just cropped the date out so they could use it.

[@dexseesall9828]

How can you not see ANYTHING on this trial?

[@Asidebar]

by obeying the rules and not watching!

[@leahmurray666]

If u are a witness instructed not to watch any, u just dont watch any ! Its important. If it comes up on ur phone or computer, turn it off !

[@Curtis006]

basic self-control

[@nw6070]

Great so now witnesses can just enjoy watching And then say in court they didn’t and all is good ? The law system and its logic is pathetic . Let’s keep the ones who claim no and kick out the ones who admit to it lol

[@Curtis006]

@@nw6070 well that would be perjury, so, ya know, not the best idea

[@pencilsniper]

Why are they looking up things about people or witnesses in the case while it's ongoing? Isn't that grounds for contempt?

[@yomilalgro]

I love this judge 💯💖

[@sylviacruz2249]

She’s trying to avoid a mistrial.

[@KD-oy8qt]

@@sylviacruz2249 how would a mistrial happen? Real question not so familiar with us law

[@sylviacruz2249]

@@KD-oy8qt hi. The judge is cautiously avoiding errors in legal proceedings. Also she instructs the jury to avoid discussions and independent investigations to avoid jury misconduct. These are statutory reasons for mistrials.

[@remrettgorden2566]

Hence the reason why we do not broadcast the hearing in the UK. The risk of prejudice is so high!

[@margotrobbie8582]

Which prejudice

[@luki13]

I’m watching this part right now and I am confused about why the judge even asked her if she had been watching the trial before being in court.

[@maggie1292]

Because witnesses are forbidden from watching, reading or talking about the trial prior to their testimony. It keeps them from hearing or knowing what others have testified too and prevents their testimony from being influenced by what others have said. If she heard what he said on the stand she could just repeat that instead of basing her own testimony on her own first hand knowledge and memory.

[@christenbrown11]

@@maggie1292 makes sense! Is there a special rule for expert witnesses? Just because I’ve seen the doctors refer to other doctors testimony from the day prior, etc.

[@maggie1292]

@@christenbrown11 Yes, expert witnesses are the exception to the rule

[@stephaniegamble3571]

More people are getting thrown out of this trial and courtroom.. This is a JOKE. I have never seen anything like this

[@silverkitty2503]

yup

[@harleyanne3720]

Crazy town.

[@Asidebar]

it's SOP people get kicked out for violating the rules.

[@dyloak6450]

Yes!

[@nateriver5841]

In the age we're living in, it's IMPOSSIBLE for someone not to be bombarded with information online. Especially if in the news an article says that *your name* will testify then facebook and google will most likely push those notifications of the trial to you

[@rosscarroll6735]

It's definitely not impossible. She didn't scroll past something in her newsfeed, she admitted to watching clips.

[@SuperLaborn]

I just love how Amber’s gf cropped a photo abs showed the lawyers, only for them to jump on it. Then for the lawyers to look ridiculous because it was the wrong date then Amber’s girl got kicked out 😂😂

[@lindaaycoth7332]

Sad

[@MLMLW]

If you're talking about this girl she was a friend of Johnny's, not Amber.

[@BLU3W0LFx]

@@MLMLW No they're talking about the girl in the front row behind Amber's team in the black jacket. She was looking through Georgina's instagram during this and cropped a photo and sent it to Amber's lawyers for the them to make a move only to find out the date of the photo was back in 2021.

[@MLMLW]

@@BLU3W0LFx - Ah, ok. Got it. Thanks for the clarification. 👍

[@davidchadwick5423]

But, some damage has been done against Johnny as all the jury now knows is that one moment Georgiana is on the stand, the defense asked to approach the bench, they had a pow wow, and then the jury is dismissed for a while. The jury doesn't know about Barlow. So hopefully, big picture, it won't be that big of a deal; but in the micro, it is, unfortunately, a minor setback for Team Depp. ugh

[@l-train7876]

How did they find out?

[@keri117]

I love judge penny! She's very fair with people, and she's so classy and sweet!💞

[@technomage6736]

"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: Just pretend you didn't hear that." 😒🤦‍♂️

[@patrickbahnak884]

When was that lol

[@loucifer9618]

@@patrickbahnak884 You see the OP's facepalm emoji? That's meant for you too.

[@patrickbahnak884]

@@loucifer9618 thanks for the compliment

[@mariascoolstuffimportexpor5383]

Amber is a shame for the female gender.

[@vixlet9122]

💯 agree

[@BenjaminGoose]

And the female sex (ie the biological one, not the societal one).

[@1chienandalou]

Amber is a shame for humanity

[@Demane69]

It's a reflection of the sickness within our society. She is but one example in a countless many.

[@keepitreal477]

How in the world can you expect Noone to have seen clips of this trial, its every where.

[@reflection8578]

How did they know to ask this?

[@barrientosmrthaolbarriento1485]

Blessing to JD !!!Really nice guy inside out 💛💫🙏🙌

[@AhJodie]

Why is this tape looped?

[@margotrobbie8582]

Wym by looped

[@AhJodie]

@@margotrobbie8582 played more then once within the video.

[@inmyopinionnnn]

2:11 he got up like “yah not gaining up on my friend” 😭

[@DanielDemers]

Why would she do that??

[@fetomy]

the fact that Amber's team is constantly trying to discredit all of the witnesses with all their power but with completely irrelevant stuff, like this or Dr Curry with the muffins just proves that they know they have zero chance of legitimately proving her innocence and or his guilty.

[@darleneabutler6230]

J

[@kimporter1744]

God bless Johnny!! We love you!💘

[@alwaysyouramanda]

Imagine wasting everyone’s time like that-!!? Ooohhhh how embarrassing

[@alwaysyouramanda]

Oh- what’s worse-!? The JUDGE got it wrong-!! It was an old trial-? But she ASKED

[@cadencecasey8159]

i mean, how can you not see anything about the trial though?

[@jeffjones3040]

She isn't being questioned as to be a potential JUROR!!!! I have never heard of a WITNESS being treated as such!

[@michaellovett8773]

A subpoena to appear as a witness states you are not to see, hear, or inquire into the testimony in the trial. Prevents manipulation of questions asked and answered by the witness.

[@jeffjones3040]

@@michaellovett8773 ... Actually, I believe ya!!!! Cause that is how the system works. Idiotic. Keep knowledge of the trial, out of the trial, right?!?!?!? Makes total sense!!!

[@wheresthebeefwherestheprob9951]

You couldn't pay me to watch anything with Amber Heard it now! I will boycott every movie she's in! What Amber Heard has done (lying about being abused by Johnny Depp just to destroy him) will definitely cause harm to Men and women who are actually being abused! If the court finds in JD favor then AH should be made to give every single penny she has left to shelters that protect ACTUAL abuse victims! And of course give every penny back to JD that she took!

[@blackice8634]

"Oh I believe this is the first time you've heard of this" LMFAOO

[@samxdxsoza]

Why did you air it online if you didn't want her or anyone to see it

[@wesseljordaan7781]

Not a very 'bright' witness, I sit in South Africa and know that if you will be called as a witness you are not supposed to watch/listen to anything to do with the trial! YAWN 😴

[@silverkitty2503]

@Joshua Illingworth it was both and she should would have been told not to watch it numerous times and the lawyers are just saying 'this is the first time we have heard of this' meaning they would have instructed her not to watch. She seems like an idiot tbh.

[@henrycole8705]

If you cannot win a case on the truth, you have witnesses eliminated

[@testtube43]

And yet Amber said 'I have not been smirking' making it clear she had been reading or seeing comments about her behaviour during the trial.

[@russellsmejkal304]

How did the opposing Lawyers even know about that

[@berretta9mm158]

"Your Honor, this is the first we've heard of it..." It was either purposeful or INCREDIBLY INCOMPETENT of them to not know she was watching parts of a trial she was testifying in, and for not simply ASKING her this before she testified. Any other judge would have castigated them HARSHLY and publically for tainting the jury (who, no matter what the judge says, cannot "unhear" what a witness like this has said), and been FURIOUS at the wasted time. Heard's lawyers impeached the witness illegaly - fraud and witness tampering. They should be in jail. WHAT???? The Heard team "forgot" to ask one of Depp's "key" witnesses whether or not she had been following the trial through "computer video clips" which, if she was on Heard's side, would allow her to bolster testimony others had made AGAINST Depp? There is a REASON the participants who testify are told NOT EVER to watch prejudicial - or any - coverage of the other testimony! Her team of "Lawyers" are like High School students who are pretending to be lawyers - and they very much reflect the personality of Amber Heard: they lie, manipulate, ask petty questions about a forensic psychologist having "dinner and drinks" with Depp as if the two of them were alone in a love nest, instead of in the company of his security, his legal team, and anyone else involved in evaluating her use as an expert witness - not unusual AT ALL in a case this high profile, and droning on and on for an endless time about her husband bringing morning muffins to her office before she talked to Amber Heard. What in God's name does this have to do with ANYTHING, except a little kindness? I can't understand this judge at all - I would have lost my patience with her "legal team" within an hour of the first day of their senseless, useless, and unprofessional B.S. If he doesn't win this case, then our "wokeness" about men just being "violent" and "toxic" by the very fact that they were born male, will be the end of us, and "justice" for men is already dead. Between the two of them, it appears the crazy and violent one is HER. Why is it people have such a hard time believing that WOMEN are fully capable of insane acts of emotional, intellectual and physical acts of violence AT LEAST equal to that of men? The fact that he drinks and gets high has NOTHING to DO with whether or not he is violent. If someone is violent, then they will be MORE violent when intoxicated. If they are passive and kind, the chances are great that they will be even more so when inebriated. This man appears to have the patience of a saint - and she has used that against him, and is trying to destroy him in every way - she seems to be just pure evil. Her legal team is lying, manipulative, petty, and vicious - just like her. It's a great match. I am a man - and have both witnessed it happening to other men, and had it happen to me. Men are taught it is shameful FOR THEM when a woman abuses them and discouraged from ever discussing it - or even ADMITTING it - let alone reporting it. I hope Heard is DESTROYED by this trial, and her team of lawyers never gets a case again.

[@vinujawijesuriya4833]

it was from the old trial the photo was dated in 2021 they got found out for using an old photo to get her out the chair

[@majormarketing6552]

You do not need a book to say what you said

[@scarlettmauner475]

mans really let up some pent up frusturation in this comment lmfaoo

[@denaturner8871]

Let me know when you're done with that soapbox, there are several people in/ around the neighborhood that have things to say & they don't have a soapbox so I offered to lend them the KZbin Comments' soapbox. 😁

[@carolineboyden6101]

Yes. But I have a problem with ‘at least’. It doesn’t make sense. Everything else I agree with

[@joffymushtaq8804]

people is where the power is. Johnny has gotten far more out of this and it will last 'till the end of time. If Johnny was loved before, that love has multiplied by zillions now! Let's just all thank poor poor Amber. 😍🤗🤗🤗 justice for jonny from India .

[@TheDuckAndRogerTheHorse]

Evidence used to take to judge was from way before this trial and the left out the date. It was however the right judgement based on her vocal testimony when asked by the judge and accepted by Depps team. This also ultimately resulted in Eve Barlow Ah's "friend and journalist" being booted out of court for the whole trial. For sitting in the space reserved for legal council and live tweeting from inside the court room which the Judge had explicitly banned.

[@Richard0915]

Good job with the title

[@crimsoniron937]

These days you can't help but to hear or see something about everything. The only way to stop that is to put witnesses in sensory deprivation chambers until they're called up to bat.

[@Texas240]

Right. You open any app on your phone or web page on your computer the cookies are going to hit you with things that are relevant to you, like info on the trial. It's another case of the laws not keeping pace with technology. Basically, it's put on the witness to stay away from all technology for the duration of the trial. Any witness that says they haven't seen anything of it is simply lying.

[@Eclecticajewels]

Well, they could sequester the jurors and restrict cell phone, TV, and internet access. So, no you don’t need a sensory deprivation tank. Shielding a jury from outside information and influence can be done. It’s just sometimes judges trust that people will be honest and follow their instructions. Not that hard to do.

[@Texas240]

@@Eclecticajewels - sequestering every jury would greatly increase the cost of trial and increase the likelihood that witnesses might compromise themselves to get out of the trial and avoid the inconvenience.

[@crimsoniron937]

@@Eclecticajewels It was an intentional facetious statement but thanks for the attempted condescension. That being said, hopefully you can understand large words. If you need an explanation, here's a quarter, call someone who gives a sht about you.

[@BenjaminGoose]

It's been strict like this for a long time, and with good reason.

[@brittanyadams217]

I have a job where I have to make determinations/decisions based on laws, after conducting interviews and reviewing evidence. I have to remain neutral to both parties it sounds easy but many people can’t do it. It’s human nature to have feelings and lean more towards either party based on feelings and situations from your past or the likability or dislike one of the persons involved. Also I know they are not supposed to watch anything on the trial but how can ppl not see any of the trial it’s everywhere rn!!!!!

[@kamsolusar8529]

They have to lie obviously.

[@agapereign]

Today is the first day I’ve seen anything related to this trial.

[@sarahalyass6421]

Also how did the judge knew the witnessed watched anything?!!!

[@stemster972]

because its an american circus we dont get this type of fun in the uk

[@JunkBondTrader]

What good is striking the record in a jury trial? Can someone explain? They can't unhear things.

[@paddotk]

Why do we see the first part twice?