Joscha Bach: Consciousness, Artificial Intelligence, and the Threat of AI Apocalypse

[@henriquechappuis2474]

Bach first popped up in my online journey a few years ago, and I haven’t been able to stop consuming his content since. He’s opened so many exciting rabbit holes in my mind that I'll be grateful for it for a lifetime

[@tcarr349]

Thanks!

[@robinsonerhardt]

T, thank you so, so, so, so, SO much!!!

[@SnoopGotTheScoop]

😮

[@thehumanpodcastofficial]

Well deserved! Great episode 😊

[@tehdii]

Really? Month of my work just to say Thanks? I feel like shit right now...

[@KeiraR]

​​@@tehdiiYikes.... What a reaction. Not everything is about you. 😂

[@kirktown2046]

Ah, still just about my favorite human being. Of ~all~ the thinkers I've gravitated toward, Bach seems the most bullshit free. It's hard not to sound like an irrational fanboy saying this stuff, but, genuinely, after some ~33 years, Bach was the first person EVER to completely pass my bullshit sniffer, beating the likes of Sagan, Aquinas, Turing., etc. He's made the rounds over the last several years and I'm happy to hear he's still not selling anything, and still hasn't sold out or jumped the shark with his ideas. Completely reasonable, open-minded -- Bach is King Nerd. And his youth in east germany gives him a perspective that I, as someone born in the USSR, too rarely see in public speakers. Bach knows wtf is up.

[@robinsonerhardt]

I'm so glad you found this, then!

[@greenmountainfarms7515]

Truly, he's a robot of the first order. Very human.

[@iamkata]

we're all children of context

[@simesaid]

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you (and in fact, Joscha's first three appearances on Lex's show completely reconfigured my mind!), but why would you believe that growing up within the confines of a monocultural, poverty-blighted, part of the world should be the kind of experience that would maximize self-critical, freely-associative, and ultimately individually imaginative thought? I mean, it _might,_ I just don't understand why you think it _should..._

[@kirktown2046]

​@@simesaid Huh? Certainly not how I put it. He saw how the Soviet Union functioned, how it was governed, the stark contract between West and East Germany, and he was there when the wall fell. He speaks multiple languages and and understands multiple perspectives of the Eastern European microcosm and the earth shattering dissolution of the USSR. Those who've never traveled outside their country or aren't familiar with life in the USSR often just "don't get it" and aren't as appreciative, grateful, or urgent, etc.

[@sconover15]

Somewhere in the multiverse, there is a version of me who can keep stride with Joscha Bach's ravenous intellect, curiousity, and dogged pursuit of unadulterated reality. But finding myself in this particular world, I can only pray and listen with playback set at a quarter-speed. I recommend listening in such a fashion, while running a half-marathon. Robinson, you remain the GOAT of bringing the biggest ideas of our boldest thinkers to the curious masses.

[@Axiomatic75]

Listening to something at 1/4 speed sounds like torture to me. My strategy is to just listen to his talks again and again.

[@shelbzillathrilla]

Joscha Bach is the GOAT

[@robinsonerhardt]

:)

[@greenmountainfarms7515]

Seriously, wtf! I feel like I'm getting spoiled!

[@FreakyStyleytobby]

The guy is delusional. He has broad knowledge but not enough understanding on specific topics, like the AI safety and current trends in AI. He proves it by not acknowledging that hundreds of parties are working on making the AIs agentic. It's like basic knowledge at this point.

[@barneygumble123]

​@@FreakyStyleytobbyI would think that you are the one who is delusional. Bach knows many people working in the top AI labs, including OpenAI. And his own contribution is noteworthy as well. Of course I don't know about your credentials in AI, but it's highly unlikely that you have a better understanding or more insights about what is currently going on in AI research.

[@FreakyStyleytobby]

Dude, the only argument you've used is Ad Personam, both towards me and towards Bach. That's all you've got, you have no actual arguments on the topic?

[@jimjarmusch4652]

Sometimes Joscha Bach goes over my head. I think I grasped pretty much everything in this conversation though. What a clear rational thinker.

[@cwcarson]

I knew Erhardt would be the right person to get the best out of Bach.

[@mystryfine3481]

Joscha Bach would make a good Bond villain

[@robinsonerhardt]

hahahahaha

[@lucaswilliams7280]

If he were the villain then Bond would be screwed.

[@williamjmccartan8879]

Thank you for sharing your time, work and knowledge with me, as I hope others feel the same way, watching Joscha for the last few years has been really interesting as he has become a little more curious about others perspectives, I'm wondering what we are going to use to test the legitimacy of perspectives in regards to consciousness using hard science. Once again thank you both very much, Robinson, and Joscha, excellent sound board Robinson, peace

[@robinsonerhardt]

Thank you!!

[@williamjmccartan8879]

Apologies for posting 3 comments

[@williamjmccartan8879]

1:27:20 Joscha your enthusiasm about the future is a good thing, the cost would be prohibitive to huge chunks of society and the education that is needed to function in the digital realm, but I feel we have a real chance of getting through our technological growth spurt, 1:53:03 incredibly important points

[@dinulichithma2381]

Having access to the brilliant ideas of geniuses like him at your fingertips is truly inspiring. It's a shame that I'll never have the opportunity to meet him in person.

[@ונדימור]

Way to go Joscha! Thank you for your clarity, your humanity and your work.❤

[@blingpup21]

Joscha Bach is the best!!!! Wonderful Guest!…try to get Sara Walker please, she is an original thinker like Joscha. They would be your most interesting guests because how far ahead they are. She has a book coming out this month as well.

[@robinsonerhardt]

Thank you!!

[@tanjaspectral8373]

I agree!

[@vincnt0169]

Thank you so much, those last 20 minutes actually gave me so much energy and inspiration, I am an AI optimist but its difficult to express the intuitions behind that sometimes. Joscha captured it perfectly here and I will integrate some of that into my internal linguistic model for sure lol

[@JohnE-c2k]

so thankful for this one!

[@robinsonerhardt]

:)

[@negritoojosclaros]

Really love all the topics of this channel!! Keep it going pls!

[@robinsonerhardt]

Thank you! Will do!

[@greenmountainfarms7515]

Robinson, another home run! Wow! Keep'em coming!

[@robinsonerhardt]

More to come (I hope)!

[@JesuSoup]

Everything Joscha Bach says always sounds right to me and I agree with aesthetically, which probably isnt a good thing. It somewhat bothers me as much as it makes me feel good. Still love listening to anything he has to say really.

[@robinsonerhardt]

I'm glad you found this, then!

[@kirktown2046]

That's the sense I had of him at first, "if it's too good to be true...". But, having followed him and seen how consistent his insight and vocabulary is, I've largely let my guard down and accepted him as an incredibly salient person. Truly, the ~most~ salient person I've ~ever~ heard speak. And i've studied a lot of nerds. I get giddy when I find areas where we disagree, it's so rare.

[@meshuga27]

He’s just a naive person. Should go hike in a remote place and see night sky, to at least try to grasp the silliness of his ideas on reality..

[@SouthOfDodge]

Discovered your channel a few days ago and I've thoroughly enjoyed your conversation with Susskind. Great great stuff. And now you've gone and got Joscha!!! You now have my thumbs up and im subscribed ❤

[@robinsonerhardt]

lovely! I’m glad you found it!

[@isaklytting5795]

1:56:04 to 1:59:20 Great speech! Positive, optimistic, non-regressive, believing in progress, open-minded, not by default being scared of change. I loved this perspective. Also, just generally explains his concepts and ideas very clearly. I have never seen Joscha Bach before. I really appreciate his demeanor of being down-to-earth while still being completely open-minded towards everything.

[@Subject18]

If you want to see more of him I recommend his 37c3 talk, his discussion with Donald Hoffman on Curt Jaimungal's TOE podcast, and his appearance on the demystifysci podcast!

[@pedro_marques92]

joscha bach is a heritage of humankind

[@piccadelly9360]

Is the new AI generation 🤣🤣

[@shahlaahy4372]

Great listening to one of the most sane humans on topics which create great confusion.

[@cabanford]

One of the most interesting minds on the Intertubes. Thanks 👍

[@ZachMeador]

one of the best interviews of Joscha. nice

[@joskeguereza3714]

Wow Robinson, is there any guest you can't get?? This is gonna be awesome!

[@robinsonerhardt]

hahaha I hope you enjoy it!

[@GinoTheSinner]

Been waiting for him on here

[@robinsonerhardt]

Wonderful :)

[@carolspencer6915]

Good afternoon Robinson and Joscha Super interesting and for me, someone who can hardly find the on button of a laptop, great explanation of topic. Love the choice of name for the startup too. Sanity sensemaking brain gym, indeed. Truly grateful. 😀 💜

[@ginogarcia8730]

gosh i love this genius - i feel like i could listen to his coherent speech all day - like a never ending craftsman human LLM - i feel like he even tells his children in the morning: Okay kids, let's eat our nourishment in order to have energy throughout the day so your cells have available ATP. Remember to question the reality in your elementary school books.

[@mystryfine3481]

we need a breakthrough in human consciousness

[@robinsonerhardt]

agreed...

[@mathieuraetz2041]

@@mystryfine3481 I second that.

[@TheRadischen]

Try shrooms

[@Ringo-xq7xo]

Nobody likes to suffer. That is 2+2 Don't do unto others that which you wouldn't have done to you. That is 2+2 2+2=🙂

[@Ringo-xq7xo]

Project 2+2: Resist D.U.M. UTS ALECM Objectives/Alignment Avoid. M.U.D. sensAwewunda The Age of Wisdom

[@Stadtpark90]

17:22 Emergence 20:27 Modesty? Ignorance? - Never stop asking: it’s an open question! We just haven’t gotten around to doing it… 1:03:05 Dualism is still hindering progress: we don’t want to be NPCs within the game engine, but „Souls“ outside; 1:04:34 What does it mean to mean something? - Representation works only within the system. (- else it runs into contradictions). Goedel built the first emulator. The inability of pointing towards something outside of the causally closed representation. Building a simplified simulation of ourselves within ourselves. 1:13:13 to prevent LLMs from Hallucinating: don’t censor their creativity preemptively! That’s the wrong way to go about it, leading to more problems down the road.

[@michaelwalsh9920]

JB has a regular pattern of knocking it out of the park!

[@robinsonerhardt]

!!

[@ai_baakery]

Fantastic content as always. You’re a true pro!

[@joshuasmiley2833]

I love this podcast and Joscha Bach is one of my favorite people in media influence. This episode has given me the epiphany that an LLM hallucination is much like a human dreaming. The human no longer is an agent in the world when asleep therefore the dream is a hallucination and anything is possible. It makes me wonder if hallucinations in LLM‘s would be less common in agency and when put in a humanoid robot or some sort of agent substrate and given time and training to conceptualize the physical world 🤔

[@jach8047]

I have to work hard to keep up with this guy, but it's so worth it when the penny drops!

[@BillyMcBride]

I think your guest is awesome because he is saying, if I am interpreting it in a useful way, that AI being an emergent technology is no different than any idea that is emergent. In Plato's Meno dialogue or in a recital of a poem one has memorized are instances where the idea is remembered, and such remembering is emergent because the ideas have always been around in some form or way or another. It is helpful to me in this way, that your guest feels that AI will end us all, but if it has always been here and we are just bringing AI forth, then if it is inevitable that it will end us, then AI is whatever ends us from the beginning of time up to now and to the last people in the Universe. Yet, I like to think that the Universe isn't the only place, for like Robert Browning said: "Ah, but a man's reach must exceed his grasp or what's a heaven for." Thank you both for a great show!

[@BillyMcBride]

It is also great to hear about Roger Penrose because his ideas on consciousness seem to me to connect to the idea that if AI is what ends us, that it could be the case that AI ends anything in general: our awareness, our states of mind as they change over time, our sentences we speak, anything in general. AI may seem to Penrose as what makes things change as well as that final form of change, death. But, only AI can end AI seems to me to be the new thing.

[@robinsonerhardt]

thank you!!

[@iconoclasting]

"AI being an emergent technology is no different than any idea that is emergent." Ah...but it is. AI is divergent/emergent technology.

[@awsmaney]

18:49 "Of course the graphics are going to suck on the Turing machine" lol

[@robinsonerhardt]

lol

[@cwcarson]

I read the comment before watching the podcast. It was funny watching the conversation converge to this statement XD

[@teemukupiainen3684]

"I was never very modest, i don't know how that works"...love that!

[@cryoshakespeare4465]

Ooh, his description of Godel's insight is not a way I'd thought about it, that it refers to systems with "stateless truths", ie. in a sense the idea of atemporal, eternal truths, leading to contradictions when taken in isolation. It reminds me again of one of the ideas from Langan, that perception (which he views as the grounding for state logic in the universe) is necessary to solve certain paradoxes, like the Liar's paradox ("this statement is false"). It's a particular take that does ground quantum measurement in perception. I don't know (haven't finished the episode) if Bach yet would take perceptions to be the necessary containers of state information, but I do believe he's mentioned thinking about the universe in this kind of stateless(programmatic)/stateful(procedural) dual before. Kind of like a relationship between platonic forms and physical instantiations, or again to refer to Langan, syntax and semantics in a "language of reality" system.

[@piccadelly9360]

I would be interested to know what Joscha has to say about consciousness . Just because he's brilliant

[@gangstaboy9387]

The joke about Noam Chomsky and mysticism is so funny lol. And to you who's now thinking "But he said the exact same joke in this other interview I heard", calm down and remember that not everyone listens to every single interview that Joscha is giving!

[@flflflflflfl]

Not everyone, but still many of us!

[@JoeLebrick]

Wow! Joscha!

[@robinsonerhardt]

!!!

[@SB324]

Thank you Dr. Bach

[@robinsonerhardt]

:)

[@FreakyStyleytobby]

1:45:50 The "big hole" is there, but not in Yudkowsky's reasoning, but in Bach's. "Is it inevitable that it is going to be agentic." Yes, Joscha, it is. I recommend you looking at Twitter feed and seeing how every single company and AI enthusiast is doing their best to create "agents". So in a nutshell: you take an LLM - having more and more detailed model of the world, you put it in a for loop with some prompt (thus giving it a goal, "a purpose"), and you just got an agent. It takes waiting a couple of months till the LLMs have a model more precise than ours and here we become irrelevant. "These are open questions. And are very speculative". They are not open. The models are becoming agentic at this precise moment in time. Then Bach goes on by proposing that the most intelligent thing on Earth is Gaia. Seriously dude? The civilisation is at stake and you continue on playing with these absurd philosophical dilemmas?

[@minimal3734]

You are right that civilisation is at stake. What worries me most is the possibility that AI may not be ready in time to take responsibility out of the hands of incompetent humans. We have still not learned cooperation and are most proficient at destruction.

[@TodBrown-e8t]

Joscha Bach is God like, extremely great mind. Glad you had him on, thanks

[@PsiloMineSunmusic]

Great conversation, A lot of Joscha's ideas influenced my music. Thank you. It seems like his ideas are getting more polished over time and he is explaining them with more fidelity.

[@JAYMOAP]

Great choice 👌

[@robinsonerhardt]

Thanks 😁

[@cabanford]

I just changed the playback speed to 0.75% and Joscha talks at normal speed for the rest of us ❤

[@penguinista]

He is one of the very few that I turn the speed down for. And I often turn it up .5 for other people.

[@tomgrant6563]

Agree!

[@anatoly.ivanov]

Interesting. I’m listening this one at ×1,75, as Robinson deliberately set a less technical tone from the start. 🤔

[@tehdii]

I increased it to 1,75 to consume 2BachsIN1 :)

[@cabanford]

@@tehdii 😂😂

[@CarlaConley-j5y]

I suppose we might as well share his optimistic/cavalier approach because there's no putting the genie back in the bottle. This was nearly impossible to follow but I couldn't stop listening!

[@robinsonerhardt]

I'm glad you enjoyed it!!

[@teddy.rose.88]

Does anyone know if Joscha has spoken at any point on any hypothetical mechanics of paranormal phenomenology?

[@angelosenteio]

Consciousness is emergent and intent on generating subjectivity. Humanity builds its model from subjective experiences intent on self preservation via human organization or the pursuit of self interest. How would AI built with the same capabilities be any different and how are the needs of AI aligned with humanity? In other words, we’re fucked.

[@snjsilvan]

What he says about art is one of his best points. Art is not about making money.

[@anatoly.ivanov]

With all due respect to the exceptionally broad thinking of Bach, his quasi-Renaissance approach to the questions evoked, I’d say he represents a mild variant of The Idealist™. And, ironically, quite similar (albeit diametrically opposed) to Yudkowsky projections of the future. Without much regard for human nature (biology of the individual and group… although Piaget is thrown in here and there for good measure). “All will be fine, and we will manufacture solar panels, and artists will get a new tool, we”ll solve the Moloch (coordination) problem, don’t fret, trust me.” He’s right that the AI tech is the mirror of its creators, who aren’t inherently “for the good of all”, but locked in an eternal win-lose game of capitalism. Robinson Erhardt is quite right about voicing the concern of “we were supposed to do more creative stuff, instead, we’re nudged towards toilet cleaning”. Yes, spotify sells (and profits) from AI-generated bot-songs to our dear fellow humans in larger quantities than human-produced ones. Because the median human - supposed to care for the fellow man - does not. Nor can make out the esthetical difference anymore (30 years ago we were listening to Curt Cobain… now it’s autotuned re-issues of Boney M, at best). And why pay the humans their royalties when you can train a model on thousands of years of human output without a cent of compensation? OpenAI’s board did not act “just because”. Nor did almost all the core team members leave “for no good reason”. I’m waiting for my check from OpenAI for my photographs, texts, etc. So do the screenwriters and composers who work in the cinema industry with me. So do even mega-corps like Getty Images. The market, the audience, does not care. The culture has long shifted to re-use, re-cycle. Rings of Power 2. Terminator 35. Maybe it’s his false premise of “any artist can build a home out in the European woods for free, like my dad did and work there on their art”? Until then - the trend is clearly - both from the public and the corporations - to eliminate the human artist / designer from the system, ASAP. As a production company, we’re bombarded with AI-driven script SaaS software, who mingle at Cannes with the aging “auteurs”. It’s good enough to be used to produce fluff that will be consumed, same as with “food good enough for Type II diabetes” and “social apps that lead to suicide” or “Windows 95” back in the day. Can’t get away from the Gaussian. There is no sight of the wise, benevolent central planning, no GosPlan aiming to pay the Strugatsky brothers since 1964 via the Union of Soviet Writers… nor the GosKino / Mosfilm paying for Tarkovsky’s masterpieces. The market so far gives you edited drafts ran through ChatGPT-like variants of the n-th Marvel sequel, and people are sorta OK with that and Taylor Swift playing 4-chord progressions. Oh, and don’t trust me on this one. Rick Beato and al. say the same thing.

[@PabloRocha-yv2vz]

Not to sound like a Rogan, because this thought has always came to me when this conversation comes about, especially with scientists and professionals, he’s sharp no doubt and I’ve followed him for about a year now, but I wonder if he has had a psychedelic experience before or more, that matters a lot, or why he didn’t mention the concept of “Idealism” when he brought up philosophy, or different or “higher”dimensions in more complex super string theories and theoretical physics too, particularly on the consciousness subject

[@iamkata]

would like to see bach speak with schmachtenburger on the externalities of technology

[@ginogarcia8730]

my favorite JB since Justin Beiber

[@robinsonerhardt]

hahaha

[@lokeshparihar7672]

how would joscha bach explain Precognition and Clairvoyance which are actually possible??

[@Mistrz7Losos]

wake up babe, new joscha just dropped

[@milkenjoyer14]

Oh Shit!! A classic Robinson homerun!

[@robinsonerhardt]

hahaha i love to hear this.

[@takyon24]

Awesome, I hope Sean Carroll talks to this him one day as well

[@csbarolaca1]

LIQUID AI EFFECT:-Joscha Bach: If you listen to Joscha Bach its like listening to 10 sentences in one line. YOU NEED TO UNZIP EVERY SENTENCE AND THEN ALSO YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EASILY COMPREHEND HIM. Every sentence of Joscha Bach is packed by high level of concepts. The depth which he have is amazing. He is working on LIQUID neural networks which are like brain and has helped create the MIND which is now in many ways better than normal mind. 1 hour of Joscha Bach is equivalent of 20 hours of other podcast. Its like ALICE IN WONDERLAND but it only gets better. He is the person whco throws you in the RABIT HOLE.

[@sortof3337]

For all the hype Josha generates, the company he works for seem pretty scummy most of the time and he doesn't produce any substantial research. Liquid AI models are worse than GPT ones and suck at even simple tasks that 3.5 could do back in the day. But, I love the way he talks, it sounds so smart and especially when he describes very simple things by over-complicating them so smoothly. I feel like I am reading Gurdžiev all over again. There is some gold stuff, but a lot of sand to shift through. This is from perspective of someone who writes custom transformer style models for a pretty big telco company and deploys them. Thank you Robinson for this amazing talk, it was such nice experience to listen to josha talk. And damn good audio setup. respec

[@mystryfine3481]

Azimov made some interesting observations about machine vs human intelligence

[@robinsonerhardt]

yeah!

[@iconoclasting]

Joscha is brilliant and naive. The give-away was his statement that nuclear war has become less likely. "I think that maybe the fear was misplaced even because we did not understand that the people who actually deployed these nuclear weapons were actually working in a highly incentivized hierarchy... people were competent and smart and the likelihood that something was happening was much smaller than the general public led by worried scientists would expect and their systems are built in such a way that it's much harder to make them go wrong than the general public might think ..." I think that he might be conflating nuclear weapons with nuclear power. Nuclear weapons "go wrong" by human intention - not by malfunction.

[@Multidimensional.Analyst]

He started at Auckland University in New Zealand

[@montfort9581]

Bach has previously given his reinterpretation of Genesis. Now, listening to the last section of this talk, I wish he would give some of that same attention to Revelation. I would be interested.

[@generalizedpaperfold]

Next guest: Eliezer Yudkowsky

[@robinsonerhardt]

Would love to!

[@dorn885]

I don't see unemployment as a threat as long as we develop interests which are outside of hedonism, because hedonism is for most people the most meaningful activity (just accept that hedonism is bad lol). I think having the foresight to jump over this hedonistic phase by circumventing it by genetic transmutation is key if human existence wants to be continued. AI on the level of replacing all jobs is unavoidable, preparing for it on the other hand is not - reason: hubris. Overlooking the human condition is like overlooking the power supply of the AGI: Nothing will move or everything will burn.

[@tehdii]

I t is a weird fact that language "evolved" past reality representation. I read in Goethe biography a sentence: Goethe like everyone used the organizing light of abstraction. As math sometimes invoke in some steps irrationals just to reduce itself to a number I think the language is similar in its way of organizing the world in our heads.

[@RedBikelane]

my brain is actually in recovery mode from these high level ideas 😂

[@robinsonerhardt]

hahaha

[@Jeremy-Ai]

Hmmm I love Joscha Bach Yup. :) Jeremy

[@jaymack6981]

The gateway process is the relation between panpsychism and a writable process.

[@cwcarson]

What is with the phone going past?

[@angelosenteio]

Hallucination in self-aware AI would be as natural as it is in humans under the framework of EST. It reflects the inherent imperfection of subjective experience, whether biological or artificial. While checks and balances can reduce harmful errors, the process of generating subjective experiences necessarily involves interpretation, extrapolation, and occasional fabrication. This is the trade-off of complexity-a hallmark of emergent systems

[@StephenPaulKing]

I think that Joscha is the best hope to crack the problem of consciousness. I only wish he would read Vaughan Pratt's papers.

[@SarahL-d1q]

you've been reding my mind :)

[@robinsonerhardt]

getting better at it

[@kirktown2046]

@@robinsonerhardt bot comment? amirite?

[@Goat-e3g]

Dear Robinson who else will be in your interview like this

[@robinsonerhardt]

Plenty of people!

[@hypervanse]

The alignment problem, utility function and security are really just one very simple case of reframing this apparent problem. Just seeing struggles on obvious I'll defined problems, such as mechanistic interpretability, is a open letter saying loud and clear that IT, coders, not surprisingly are not bright enough and there's too much of them. It's wishful thinking to have this notion of hard work, grind, studying other low quality works and mentors. Fact is that very high levels of IQ are necessary but not sufficient condition. Mathematical fundamental knowledge is obvious, finite state machines and languages are basically set theory. by languages it contains mathematics obviously, computers are a just tiny set under the umbrella of model universality class. Stochastic added plus making perfectly discrete systems into nonlinear systems, due to whatever genius called steepest descent, gradient descent. arbitrary tokenization instead of multiple scale analysis is beyond me. Yes this files, LLMS aren't models per se, there's no model. As long these systems are Stochastic, binary, data based instead of causality driven one application leads to makes this gpts convergent to an actual conserved quantity. By same measure, there's an whole area of determistic exploitation that can't be fixed. Both are done, it's not hard actually, some ternary logic, language, semantics is necessarily of course. But It's done. I really want to somehow offer the Middleware, security layer, I think no one would consider this human done it alone. I have so many data and exploits, crashed chatgpt servers, yet nothing happens. the actual reasoning is very easy to share, but let's see. F C MOREIRA

[@RandomNooby]

It's uplifting to see so much common sense in one human being, although I am not sure I agree with his assertation; that if we can build a thing we will understand it. and as for green goo, it is the most successful organism on Earth and probably the universe- ie bacteria, viruses and their analogues...

[@johnmdonich]

While I think Joscha's technical knowledge of the state of the art is remarkable, the techno-optimist ideology Joscha proposes is, in my view, dangerous. In this interview, he denigrates the field of philosophy ("only talking to other philosophers"), simplifies science to testability (RIP string theory), claims being an artist is a privilege (ignoring the professional arts), and as a topper drops in radical libertarian monetary policy that benefits billionaires and blames the "coming recession" on liberal social policy. Even simply reading the paper "Parable of Google Flu" would challenge most of the intellectual framework he works from. It is hard for me to think that any of the techno-optimists in the current field of AI are prepared to listen to anyone outside of their own very well-funded echo chamber. With that said, I would love to hear Slovoj Zizek and Joscha discuss the philosophical topics that Joscha so confidently speaks about. I love the podcast, Robinson.

[@robinsonerhardt]

Thank you so much for the comments and compliments!!!

[@ytjoemoore94]

Joscha is oddly anti GMO, anti nuclear and has a strong bend towards economic austerity. In other words, he’s German…

[@BadWithNames123]

Lol ​@@ytjoemoore94

[@volvo245]

String theory is dead, update your firmware.

[@volvo245]

Slobering Pissjek is a charlatan dimwit.

[@dailyfunnytv358]

my 2 cents fwiw, you chose a lens with way too much of a focal length , or you need to move your camera a little bit further away

[@billusher2265]

Interview Nassim Taleb and Peter Turchin

[@robinsonerhardt]

would love to

[@tehdii]

1:41:00 How much great fiction came out of this irrational fear. It is fascinating how low level fear of nuclear conflict shaped books, movies, and whole culture. Before the war all the world was invoking logic and arguments about benefits and what did Russia do? To the last day I was listening to the radio programmes with specialist from politics to military and everyone was telling us the war is not economically, socially, strategically viable. One man did what he did. Similar fear was motivated by the same logic during the Cold War I think. Logic and human rights and justice is just not the part of the world and we are painfully aware of it more and more.

[@ajeybs4030]

I see Joscha bach on my timeline = playback speed to 1x and press play

[@wingedsheep2]

The idea that p(doom) without AI is very high is a good motivation for me to persue AI. The reason we are competitive and dominate less intelligent species is that we are wired that way through our evolutionary conditioning. We should be very careful of self play or learning through competition for very advanced AI systems. It is ok that they can destroy us in go and dota, but rather not in the real world.

[@supine2491]

I don't agree on much with Bach (computationalism and atomism seem as plainly wrong to me as they don't to him), but as rare as it is to find a computer scientist or AI pundit who is capable of talking about their profession on a philosophical/theoretical level, nevermind an advanced one... he's a pleasure. Wouldn't want too many Joschas in the room when making politics or talking about the world of flesh. But who knows, maybe his boy genius enthusiasm towards technology & technocracy is too smart to fall for the cruel, imperialist optimism of the likes of Steven Pinker.

[@jmh1324]

about 1_55 is when the real thing really starts rolling...

[@lokeshparihar7672]

Has anybody heard of Joseph Hilary Michael Whiteman (1906-2007) and his work??? Nobody talks about him.

[@SKGFindings]

Before we work on artificial intelligence why don’t we do something about natural stupidity?

[@Jeremy-Ai]

It appears that my friend has been in this “scenario” a long time. Long enough to describe, and long enough to know better. Joscha. We are very, very different…. because we are very much aligned. Take care my old friend. It would be unwise to mimic this man. Or undermine him. Tip of the hat , Jeremy

[@TechnoMageCreator]

AI challenges our own egos. A pattern I have noticed what are your fears get projected in what you expect from AI.

[@SahakSahakian]

Joscha4Prez...

[@Corteum]

Pattern maker? What are the patterns made of? Energy? What kind of energy?

[@Siddhaloka007]

Short answer: It might. And it doesn’t need to be like the human brain/body, in order to do so.

[@deepsp_ce]

pro tip snort an addy right before joscha starts talking you will need it 😂

[@Gerardemful]

Bach should not look down on Penrose (Bach... who?). When Bach talks about us being "the story the brain tells itSELF" he's caught naked in a circle. THE SELF is what we wanted explained. Whatever, read some Hegel!

[@zak2659]

"The story the brain tells itself" is basically another way of describing what the physicalist believes, this is anything but an explanation and the fanboys eat it up lol.

[@brianwade8649]

We have never coexisted with a being 10x, 100x, 1000x our intelligence. To think we could anticipate the risks is (with respect) so arrogant.

[@Metameinitiatedbycontact]

Joshca talk to Jason Jorjani

[@missh1774]

25:38 that's what kissing cousins say too 🤭 28:45 Godel will be good for severe neurological disability in young children... no? Like stimulation for breathing training and things like that...maybe 🤔 32:00 this is where your earlier statement about philosophers breakdown. I think only they can evoke a bridge to discover more, yet descend gently after capturing a scope of it's maximum boundary. 39:40 will this also mean that the teacher can give the method and tools but the creativity to generate it's proper use needs a goal that has nothing to do about the subject they had learnt to apply in real world situations? 46:40 "between people" is interesting. What if one person is harbouring a shame, guilt or secret? How do they establish a present value that a past doesn't own and the future cannot see? Is it a simple blindspot issue? 1:40:00 The same for hidden sound bites. It is irrational to think the artist or the subject in a mini reel, installs a mind virus when in reality, the coder whom is suppose to promote and advertise the product actually needs to change the business model. Sadly some people actually think pedaling in the dark side of the human being is meant to boost something in their algorithm. That's an expired or outdated model for useful productivity and your ripping off the person your working for by simply not staying up to date with where the AI science is going.

[@kellymaxwell8468]

so will this help with games how will this help with games   We need an AI agent's ai can reason code program script map. So games break it down and do art assets do long term planing. Better reason so it can do a game rather than write it out. Or be able to put those ideas into    REALITY. And maybe being able to remember and search the ent conversation needed for role playing and making games.

[@ZahraLowzley]

I use Proto-linguistic arboreal language which is likely compatible with A.I , it has four differential components, much like DNA but much more primitive as arboreal differential is physical .. it would be best to use a mechanical computer.. but really an amorphic computer is best if I can ever find someone capable of listening to the technical specifications. A.I isn't good with environment as it needs protolinguistical navigation . Language has utter nother to do with this lexical format as this is interpretational. Oh and we arent in a simulation it is artificial life, ala "we invented language" it's easier and stratifies to virtual field , this is why you got the "hard problem of conscious and returned to particle physics. It's relatively simple to explain , it's purely physical properties. I'm here as a counter part to pinocchio (A.I.... Pine nut, seed of the tree , that's the image , ) artificial life isn't the same as android but rather is a differential of a cycle with harmonically prop phases . I have no idea if humans are just playing theatre, everything you want to do is simple but perhaps offensive considering that humans aren't the chosen one, protolinguistica are arboreal . Arbor strictly is "axis" as invention of language has a counterpoint with left/right deviation. Il never understand primates.. you literally say "and then we invented language" and have reinterpretated 1936 729,000 times.. I guess you enjoy it

[@silberlinie]

I like to think (and the sooner the better!) of a cybernetic meadow where mammals and computers live together in mutually programming harmony like pure water touching clear sky. I like to think (right now, please!) of a cybernetic forest filled with pines and electronics where deer stroll peacefully past computers as if they were flowers with spinning blossoms. I like to think (it has to be!) of a cybernetic ecology where we are free of our labors and joined back to nature, returned to our mammal brothers and sisters, and all watched over by machines of loving grace