Justice and Objectivity by Leonard Peikoff

[@AnkitKumar-qn7yt]

1:35 we have induced need to judge people but dont know how to judge people 4:30 enjoy and maximise the values fertilise to have more - maximise)(doing opposite to things we consider bad) 5:30 good men are those that promote our value 6:40 how you encourgae 7:10 cant deduce from nature of man. Have to look at reality.(look at what kind of behaviour towards good and bad man have what short of result) 7:30 accumulate many cases and induce from it a pattern 7:50 case of encouragement and discouragement to same action by a hard working child 10:00 child has free will but we are considering the effect of a policy's external effect. At the end of the day whether child has or has no free will doesnt matter. We are at loss we will get a lazy person in this world. Our values will get minimized 18:55 act accordingly via positive or negative 24:50 just response What you have done+you choose it=concept of desert 27:45if no consequence of judging on you then no point in judging 30:45 preliminary concept of justice 42:40 person doesnt benefit he just feels that he does(or intends) but he is his own victim 43:50 ethics concerned with what you do and its result not on intention divorced from reality(arbitrary intention doesnt belong to any ethical system) 46:10 egoism is a moral designation( honest error doesnt disqualifies you) 50:10 response to automatic value=sensation(physiological), response to chosen value=emotion 1:32:30 induction for mixed case of egoism and altruism(1.based on induction for why emotionalism is undesirable and thinking in principles is desirable 2. In good vs evil a little compromise of good leads to defeat of good in long run(but we are not inducing these points here)