एक गलती वकील को बहुत भारी पड़ा , How not to argument in HC!

[@minecraftsaurus5765]

For people who do not understand why the judge screamed so much, the mistake made by the lawyer was that he made Speaker of Assembly as a party to writ petition in Sr. No. 6. This is extremely sensitive topic. Speaker of Assembly cannot be ordered by any court to create a law on any matter. Judiciary cannot cross that line. It is good that the the Hon'able judge caught this blunder. By mistake, if this writ was accepted, this judge would become a laughing stock in whole world and get impeached within a month and lose his job. This lawyer realised his horrible mistake after reading the writ.

[@maheshbtmohan]

Thank u

[@subesingh3536]

Thanks! I thought he has typo... but ye to blunder nikla 🤣

[@maheshbtmohan]

Sir u think the lawyer did it purposely?

[@naveents1732]

Thanks a lot, I was searching for this comment.

[@shakti.rathore]

Was it a mistake or was it a clear deliberate attempt to take undue advantage of the process of law?

[@praveenchandra4352]

Hard hitting but , much needed step by the Hon'ble Judge, bcz whenever I deal with petitions from there for the purpose of drafting SLP etc. the drafting standards are really, pathetic sometimes, Mr. P.N Lekhi sir, used to say while arguing cases before Delhi High court, that Sanctity of the pleadings is of prime importance.🙏...from a leagal learner.and Advocate.

[@-SACR3D-]

It is a lesson for every advocate, junior and senior alike. A lesson in Due Diligence (when drafting), Consequences (of making such errors before the Hon'ble High Court), and Proper Conduct (when the advocate is at the receiving end in such situation). Irrespective of the unfortunate incident, if the Hon'ble Judges frame guidelines on the matter, it'll be beneficial for the whole fraternity and that is how this profession grows. Thank you for sharing, @Law Chakra.

[@shakti.rathore]

As a layman. What it looked like was that it was a deliberate attempt to misuse the exclusive powers of hble high court.

[@hemantsirohi]

Judiciary needs such judges for fair justice. Pleadings are needed to be carefully drafted.

[@wtf2090]

Just a thought if lawyers stop saying me lords infinite times may be there will be time for 💯 more cases every year

[@lianmawii]

Lol that's funny but definitely a valid point to ponder👍

[@appa232]

😂😂👏👏👏

[@jyotiprasad1366]

माननीय संभवतः वकील के बहस से खिन्न हैं, लेकिन जिला परिषद्, नगरपालिका आदि में उपयुक्त नियम उपनियम का अभाव भेदभाव और भ्रष्टाचार को बढ़ावा देता है। इस पर न्याय देने के बजाए????

[@therisingstar1728]

Make a legal submission Establish your legal right Take orders from the court !!

[@LearnEnglishinashorttime]

To err is human, To forgive divine! However, Advocates should be well prepared before Argument!

[@just4usantu]

Why....ಒಂದ್ ಕ್ಷಣ ಜಡ್ಜ್ ಮಾತು ಕೇಳಿ ತನುಮನ ನಿಶಬ್ದ ಆಯ್ತು ಮರ್ರೆ.,. just one word..,why.... I'm totally speech less.great sir🙏🌧️🌱💚🥰🍫

[@AshishSharma-bj8hh]

Same behavior was adopted by justice arun mishra in supreme court against young as well as senior lawyers. Later he has to apologize to the bar when Supreme Court Bar Council decided to bycott him.

[@saurabhjadhav2332]

Self भी बोल रहा है और Depend भी।।।।। वाह रे वकील।

[@kaypee9187]

Sir, is it possible to cite the case in hearing in the video. It will help a student to study the case in detail.

[@ashokdadhich5967]

"भाषण बाजी " अंग्रेजी की अनिवार्यता कम से कम हो जरूरी है कूछ फैसले करने के लिए हो जो इन्टरनेशनल हो लेकीन भारतीय फेसले हिन्दी मे हो

[@narayanrao8339]

Judges to the possible extent keep their irritation under control regards

[@bastelejhakday2184]

If I am not wrong he made party to some representative of legislative assembly , courts cannot specifically direct legislative assembly to create any law , they make observations or give guidelines.

[@LawChakra]

And in legal world making such mistakes is very kiddish on part of the lawyer.

[@souvikroychoudhury5965]

That means that his mistake was that he made a few individual MLAs respondents in his Writ Petition. Would this Writ Petition have been maintainable if he had only made the State respondent ?

[@prabudhatapase6714]

Yes anna

[@yourfoodsafetyconcerns3171]

Seems speaker of assembly is made respondent no. 6. Which is a big mistake. No court can summon him, it is why Hon. Judge became angry.

[@ss10483]

Advocate did not come prepared. Technically several things were wrong. Advocate clearly wanted adjournment so that he can keep dragging this case, but was caught by judge.

[@chivalrynvalour]

Not all people can handle power. The Judge who is yelling is totally unfit to dispense justice and is an aberration

[@onedayclasses7659]

Very एग्रीसिव this is not good for new lawyers Mr counsil is accepted his mistake

[@thomasraj7205]

The careless and vindictive constitutional submission to fix assembly by honble court orders will tarnish the Judges bench image and create issue reflecting both had they not scrutinized. Thats the reason may be to fire top to bottom.

[@lesd3510]

Just imagine the blunder committed by lawyers. The implications of the blunder would have been chaotic. This should be used as a case study for lawyer's both new and experienced.

[@Shrie]

i have saw this judge screeming in other video too. he is talking like he never did any mistake in his entire life. this is wrong .

[@Shrie]

​@@GokuBlackRoseSSJ3read my above comment again.

[@parikshitsomani]

Such anger should be shown to heinous offenders like rapists & murderers… Unfortunately they get bail and roam free.. But a hard working lawyer like this must surely be excused with a warning at least..

[@zimmilama3463]

Bcz of the silly mistakes like this from lawyers or investigation officers rapists & murderers walk out freely...

[@parikshitsomani]

@@zimmilama3463 this is not a criminal proceeding… also if lawyer makes a mistake then murder accused will go to jail not walk out freely…

[@RajxSarkar]

​@@parikshitsomani Murderers and rapists get bails and roam free because of the police. Most of the times police don't do proper investigation and collect evidences. Courts only decide based on evidences provided to them. So, you should blame the authority for these not the courts.

[@bharattata]

@parikshitsomani the lawyer is not innocent, he made a blunder it would have resulted in a constitutional crisis had the writ been accepted. The lawyer filed the Speaker of Bihar Legislative assembly as a respondent to the petition. If the writ were to be accepted then it would have meant that the Patna HC ordered the legislative branch to form a law, which is a line that can’t be crossed

[@slashnroses3962]

Jab kuch pata nahi ho to bhaunk mat jhaantu

[@raisajms3676]

जज का व्यवहार सही नहीं है

[@ashokkamble697]

Advocate was misleading the court. Judge is right to reprimand him. That's experience.

[@ashokkumarchaudhuri7039]

This was a serious issue but could have been kindly handled,,,

[@prabhatpathak6326]

Whats the problem in name of ranjit prasad chaudhary as respondent??

[@sayantansarkar4560]

Half the people here are talking about how the judge is the devil incarnate, please understand the mistake the lawyer did was not an ordinary one, had that writ been accepted it would have caused a constitutional crisis which would have tarnished the reputation of the high court and completely obliterated the judges carrier. The judge has every right to be angry because the lawyer threatened the boundaries of the Constitution itself simply to mislead the court and gain more time. The court cannot order the legislative wing there are boundaries the judiciary cannot cross. This was a complete blunder on the lawyer's part and he deserved the dressing down he received. So my dear illiterate commentators dont comment about shit you have no idea about and fk off💀💀💀💀

[@MaheshYadav-ek3rp]

The court of this type of judge must be biacotted.Behaviour of this judge is is condemnable.

[@zimmilama3463]

Wat about the petition filled by this lawyers??? Go through the video once again.. Lawyer tried to mislead the high court.

[@praveenchandra4352]

Bcz judges are also human beings, not Robot, they may be unhappy like us, the least one can say that the counsel had a bad Luck.

[@chaudharysolutions6594]

While it was a big mistake judge should consider the case because courts are for justice not to injoy kingship. These judges are resultant of so called great collegium system.

[@advocateanuragsinghsomvans2115]

I think lordships forget their dignity with bar ......they screamed lot this shows that how our judicial system works ....Lordships believe in concept that no one can do any mistake

[@freedom5941]

They thought they were in a bar

[@Haritsa-N]

That's how the judiciary & military works. If they don't keep it bottle neck, a country can't be run. You think politics is the only thing running this country? Politics is on the screen. Behind the scenes are judiciary, military and IAS/IPS running the system. Just to stick to the fact of the matter here, your comment is so blunt. Did you even understand the occurrence that aggravated the judge? These are not things you just share your opinions so lightly without having the understanding of the backdrop. The lawyer himself understood the gravity of the mistake & said it was a "blunder" on his part. If you think the judge's action was condemnable, don't you believe that the council is more learned than you, to have defended himself, rather than pleading for apology?!?

[@binubinu5000]

Pl make video on ban of ict for all group b & c posts in CBIC

[@dsvikas]

Our judicial system needs a PR it seems. A layman like me does not understand why the judge got so much upset. Someone should explain this situation so that a common man like me understand this whole issue.

[@freedom5941]

Chilaaaao matt

[@Val_kyriee]

do you think making the Speaker of a Legislative Assembly in a matter such a this as one of the respondents is tenable? You do not need to be a lawyer to understand this if you know the constitutional position the Speaker enjoys.

[@UzairAli-vx4dm]

See in this matter the lawyer has made a huge blunder by making speaker of legislative assembly a party in a writ petition seeking the guidelines to make a law according to the doctrine of separation of powers the exicutive, parliament, judiciary work independently no one of them can intervene into another 's work So the court cannot give any sort of direction to legislature to make law

[@Truth_seeker_24]

The judge has to deal with multiple cases in the day and be 100% focussed on lawyers arguments etc. Can the lawyer not even get the basics right? It's a lesson for him. He'll not repeat that again. Such lawyers & investigative officers (police) do similar mistakes (intentionally or unintentionally) even in cases with rapists, murderers etc and thats why they get away with it. Judge cannot sentence a rapist if prosecuting lawyer doesn't provide/present the material properly as per law.

[@argh_a]

Can you please explain exactly what happened?

[@ashokdilliwalashow]

Very interesting

[@amitlohani382]

Kaise kaise lawyer ha preparation kuch nhi ha sirf client ko lutna ha uske bad agar client khud apni pairwi kare to judge sahab ko bura lagega ki lawyer kis liye ha shame

[@Bijay.Kumar.Behera]

speaking in between while a senior is narrating to you, shows you don't want to listen to them rather you want them to listen to you, that means you are saying " Who are you ? You are nobody" if that's the case then you are digging your own grave.

[@brajagopal7016]

Ye har baat pe mylord bolna jaruri hai kya😂😂😂

[@pearlr4805]

The young lawyer made a mistake. Judge shouting at him is not acceptable. Judge knows that the lawyer cannot shout back at him. Simply a show of power.

[@star07yt13]

Lawyer did a huge blunder if honarable judge passed the order in this position within a month he might be evicted and it can also cause constitution crisis in whole country. There is a difference between judiciary , executive and legislature, judiciary is independent but there are some basic rules which advocates should follow and judge can't pass order to the parliament or speaker, it was a huge blunder

[@mehulrajopadhye]

He made the speaker a party. Its a really serious blunder

[@mpov9]

वकील की सिर्फ एक टाइपिंग मिस्टेक की वजह से जज साहब ऐसा कर रहे है , वकील बहुत महत्वपूर्ण बात रख रहा था , संविधान के नियम को लेकर ।

[@terenceburrows6685]

Agar honble judges ne petition me galti nahi pakdi hoti to jaahir hai respondents ko notice jaari ho jaate. Aur aise me assembly speaker ko bhi notice jaari ho jaataa. Jo ek gambhir samasyaa paida Kar deta aur is ka puraa dosh honble judges par Jaataa. Is liye judges naaraaz ho rahe hai

[@atulkothari1999]

Why this Judge is screaming !! So bad behaviour, highly condemnable !!!!

[@beachbuggyracing9305]

How judge can be your lord?

[@asheeshverma6359]

Not fair at all at the part of judge. Lawyers contention was polite and was raising a legal issue regarding salary and pension of employees of different zila parishad. At least lawyer should have been given opportunity to rectify his petition.

[@NitinKumar-ql7iq]

bro he made a speaker of the assembly a party on writ sr. 6😂😂. Judiciary cannot interfere with the matters of assembly, there is a line that judiciary mus'nt cross.

[@raw8155]

@@NitinKumar-ql7iq mustn’t*

[@adityadwivedi7672]

Do you even understand what was happening? Ya jo muh me Aya bol diya ?

[@ujjvalw2684]

This is not the way to talk. Cmon

[@sanjaypal9202]

Too much shouting by the Judge. May be this is the adverse consequences of the Court proceedings being streamed into public domain through online.

[@firebrand3515]

Who was the Prime Minister responsible for the 73rd and 74th amendments in 1993?

[@shyamfile]

जज का यह तरीका बिल्कुल गलत है । रिट डिसमिस करना है कर दो , इस तरह बोलने का हक किसी भी जज को नहीं है।

[@LIONroars14]

He has...u r using his time.. That's why he has the right.. Court time belongs to Judge

[@shyamfile]

तुमसे सीखने की जरूरत नहीं है, अभी बच्चे हो कानूनी दाव पेच में।

[@lalitasharma6687]

​@@shyamfile job nhi chali jati kya judge ki and majak bbta woh alag

[@anubhavsinha1984]

Not great behaviour… there may be a mistake about the drafting… but why should ppl be treated like this. The lawyer was making cogent arguments. This is a thing in courts… many a time matters are dismissed on technical grounds without looking at substantial issues. But talking properly is a prerequisite ….

[@mintusaren895]

Order order vashist muni. By syiest

[@thelogicless9040]

Court speaker ko oder nai de sakte aur is lawyer ne speaker ke against hi case kardia. Agar court speaker ke against order dedeta to is judge ko kabhi promotion nai milta besti hoti vo alag.

[@abhayraj14]

bhai judge ki nokri jaati aur assembly desolve kerne ki nobat aa jati, waise bhi assebly speaker wohe bante ha jispe aaj tak koe offence hua he na ho

[@ashokdadhich5967]

आई हिन्दी भाषा बिचमे स्थाई ना होतो हिन्दी भाषा बिचमे बोलने की अनुमति हो बहुत जरूरी हैं लेकीन अंग्रेजी जीतनी नहीं तो भी तवजू ज्यादा दे भारतीय न्यायपालिका हिन्दी को बडावा नहीं देगी तो कोन देगा

[@rahulhivlekar3920]

Poore Bharat ki nyaypalika kyu Hindi ko tavajju de? Hamare Maharashtra mein ham kabhi Hindi ka yeh sthan manzoor nahi karenge... Aapke UP ya Bihar me aap karein jo chaho wo...

[@rajmanisingh1873]

अगर इतना गुस्सा courreption पर होता तो कुछ लोग का भला हो जाता है

[@devanandnayak6774]

"Making assembly speaker as respodent". I didn't understand what happened

[@debasistripathy701]

The Justices can't call speaker to court. They will get impeached by Assembly.

[@legalknowledge139]

I think speaker ko party banaya

[@asmitaray2307]

Everyone make mistakes in their lifetime so must respect and understand

[@prateekjainllb]

Such kind of mistakes are non-pardonable, have some sympathy before such lawyer will lead to constitution crises in the country, making the Speaker of the House as Party, is a legit? do he has any stand to be a party of a Writ petition? So think before you speak.

[@ankur1242]

He is not clearly argument. Because he has not able to explain what he wants to shortly in my point of view.

[@Achilles....]

I think judge wants to ran away from writ petition and got a decent chance ... Hell with judges...

[@ramavatartiwari4356]

Mere W.P ke kesha 2017 se pending he koi sunbai nahi ho rahi he me pensanar hu kya kiya jaye upay bataye

[@prabhatpathak6326]

Name of lawyer??

[@tapandas2831]

Why do some people don't like arguing?? They are weak in reasoning power

[@vaibhavkumar9340]

Aur is judge ko misconduct ke adhar par hatana chaiye

[@documentin9171]

So many "milords" "milords"... that's so so annoying... kindly penalize him for each "milords" the advocate says...

[@chahal840]

What actually happend ? Anybody ?

[@shravankumard3008]

He added speaker of legislative Assembly. There was no reason to involve his name. Speaker would not have any power in this issue.

[@himmucool92]

Speaker can't be made party, had judges given judgment whilst the Speaker of the legislative assembly had been party, it would have created a great constitutional crisis. That's why judge did what he did.. Besides the lawyer made him party knowing he cannot be party to any thing like that.

[@pravin33554]

Why other than judge all lawyers not able to speak proper/ Fluent English Sh is श not स

[@rajendrabareto8065]

The lord should be taken away. The judges are really acting like a lords as if the lawyers are slaves. Comeon they can say in better manner also.

[@thesuperstar4470]

What was the mistake

[@nagabhushanamaravanthe2452]

Many commentators here below are sympathetic about the Counsel and made casual remarks on Judges because they were shouting. But the reality is, the innconcent looking Advocate was trying to create constitutional crisis by making the Hon'ble Speaker of the Assembly as a party, that too innoccuously making party no.10. Had the court admitted the writ, definitely it would have created a crisis and Judges would have made to face the music for crossing the line. 😢

[@naickerkandan4326]

🙏

[@ankur1242]

Who is respondend no. 6 and 10

[@AdvocateChamber]

Nepotism.

[@lalitasharma6687]

Koi hindi mei batayega yha hua kya hai

[@kaustubhponkshe6186]

I am not a law guy, but did not understand , why Judge got angry suddenly ?

[@lohitganguly2695]

Arrogance, arrogance and arrogance. Inferiority, inferiority, inferiority. I am a lawyer. Such judges should be thrown out. They should be impeached.

[@nehusingh826]

Judge buddha ho gays isliye sathiya gaya hai 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@atulaggarwal7279]

Ye bhul rahe hain ki ye bhi vakil the

[@ashutosh.r]

😂🤣 vakeel bnne k baad judge ni bnte hai ( kuch cases me bn skte hai ) . Judges ka alag exam hota hai Judge PSC-JPSC

[@arpantyagi8148]

@@ashutosh.r Ashutosh ji aisa nahi hai a high court lawyer who has practiced in high court for 10 years is eligible for being a judge through collegium system. And most of the judges of different high courts and supreme court were lawyers by profession...

[@ManishKumar-kl5ow]

@@ashutosh.r LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS VERY DANGEROUS THING.

[@souvikroychoudhury5965]

@@ashutosh.r With such knowledge about law and Judiciary, you have come here to comment🤣

[@saaaaa222]

@@ashutosh.r High Court and SC Judgea are not appointed through any exams. Most of them are lawyers and District Judges.

[@Uvam-y6t]

Judge is guilty of judicial ethics and hence in contempt

[@Indianweddings]

These judges think themselves they are lords. Take any strict action against any lawyer but they don’t have to scream like this. If lawyer has made a mistake then as a judge you are making a bigger mistake

[@star07yt13]

The mistake which lawyer did was huge. If judge passes order in this position there can be constitutional crisis in country, he was angry for this reason

[@SonuKumar-dy7kr]

You are preaching without understanding the grave mistake made by the lawyer. Due to this mistake of the lawyer, the reputation and job of the judge earned throughout his life could have been in danger and he would have become a laughing stock. His anger is absolutely justified.

[@Indianweddings]

@@SonuKumar-dy7kr did you see how the other judge’s behavior I understand the lawyer made a mistake then take the strict action but this behavior or screaming is not good as a judge

[@prasuncdas]

Who was respondent no 6 & 10?

[@pratiroopp]

Same question here

[@5tyyu]

MLA & Speaker of house

[@Samriddhi-ne5ml]

Ye Buddha mere bich m bahut bolta h 😁😁

[@vraghuraghu4688]

Wn he apoliges y u not permitting judges this is rude talking , wt happen wn u talk like this for public

[@debasistripathy701]

Lawyer re Judge ke liye gaddha Khoda tha speaker aur MLA ka name leke. Constitutional crisis ho jayega.

[@praveenchaand9473]

Is judge drunk how can he shout like this in crowded court

[@anupammishra2790]

@law chakra beta behas jordaar hi hoti hai vakeel jordar bahas nhi karega kya tum karoge uski gakti yh jo writ dali thi woh galat thi.... Court are made to do healthy argument only... If u listen proprely even judge has said we were impressed by your argument... So before making thumbnail u should see what to write or not..

[@anupamchandramitter4214]

Justice should be tempered with mercy. Your Lordships sometimes commit mistakes and that's why the appeal Courts are there.

[@Indianweddings]

Is it mandatory to speak English in court, why don’t they speak Hindi. Judges I understand are also human beings but still they need to stay calm.

[@5tyyu]

These lawyers r not polished & weak in english. Pathetic

[@jellu798]

Well Is this an Indian court ???? Why the hell are they trying to destroy English.Neither the incompetent Judge nor the illiterate lawyer could Speak the language nor they have sensible approach.Indians couldn't design their own jurisdiction system & trying to imitate Britishers. My Lord ---- hahahaha This man is Lord in India ,funny guy.

[@Pommy8740]

Bhashan dene Aya tha ..rashan leke gaya

[@vikaramsinghrathore1020]

यह अपने देश मे केसे केसे जज सहाब है जो बोलने का तरीका भी नहीं जानते वो क्या किसे न्याय देगे 😂😂😂😂😂दुर्भाग्य है देश का इतने वीडियो देखे कोर्ट के कोई भी जज सहाब वकील की बात सही तरीके से नहीं सुनते हैं ❤❤❤