A person who was unable to get one delegate in the primaries is now leading the ticket. Truth is weirder than fiction.
@joshuablaz6 ай бұрын
It's SO funny to me that he did it via Twitter. No speech, no major statement, just have the intern fire up the bird app.
@deesus10856 ай бұрын
3rd primary rigged. Amazing.
@quietus136 ай бұрын
Remember, vote democrat to save democracy! 🙃
@GettingSchwiftyy6 ай бұрын
@@quietus13 it's so pathetic. Now they roll out kamala bc no legitimate candidate wants this, yet it's an existential crisis.
@glennmitchell91076 ай бұрын
President Biden didn't have to campaign to win his election in 2020. Why do we think Kamala Harris needs to campaign to win her election in 2024?
@tsufordman6 ай бұрын
Agreed, her best strategy will be to quietly smile, and that will probably be enough to beat Trump.
@sanniepstein48356 ай бұрын
@@tsufordmanshe doesn't have to beat anyone. Dems plan to cheat.
@cjg19796 ай бұрын
Off topic, but does anyone else find it hard to shift to the video after listening in the car for years, and seeing the people behind the voices? LOL Love you guys and all you do!
@obieserious6 ай бұрын
Yes!! I was thinking Veep this whole time. Its playing in the background right now 😂
@costcolawschool6 ай бұрын
i remember noam chomsky. he wrote that book manufacturing consent. then he went around manufacturing consent to throw unvaccinated people into concentration camps during covid and didn't really seem concerned about feeding them, as i recall he said that was their problem. but hes such a loving tolerant guy, he'll even let his employees wear free palestine pins after he forces them to take 4-6 covid vaccines to keep their job. he's so tolerant, don't question it.
@GettingSchwiftyy6 ай бұрын
@@costcolawschool I never got the love for him. Interesting, smart guy, but when he talks he's so partisan that he loses any credibility. Also his views on the evolution of human language are ridiculous. He should've used his brains on an actual science or business enterprise
@GettingSchwiftyy6 ай бұрын
@@costcolawschool I guess he never read the toxicological literature on what happens to thimerosal. Hint, it crosses the blood brain barrier and accumulates there with half life in the order of years.
@LegalAutomation6 ай бұрын
I'm not exactly a "one issue voter" but to me this is what I consider: Which of the choices in front of me will increase government spending and expand the the regulatory state the least? Kamala Harris has the propensity to increase government spending and expand the regulatory state more than Donald Trump. Therefore, I will vote for Donald Trump.
@excellentcomment6 ай бұрын
Exactly. Trump's rule was 2 regulations must be eliminated for every 1 new regulation added.
@excellentcomment6 ай бұрын
Exactly. Trump's rule was 2 regulations must be eliminated for every 1 new regulation added.
@Watcher41876 ай бұрын
@@excellentcomment And his Judges are devastating ABC agencies. No way Kamala would put anyone on the bench who would remove power from un-elected bureaucrats.
@paulsnow6 ай бұрын
If libertarians believe all laws should forbid harm to others, Abortion becomes the question of when the government is required to protect the fetus/baby from harm This is why libertarians like Ron Paul can be anti-abortion.
@JohnKerbaugh6 ай бұрын
Another pillar of libertarianism is, the further away from the problem you are the less qualified you are to make proper judgment.
@toomanycatsfive6 ай бұрын
Agree… I found their suggestion that a libertarian couldn’t possibly be opposed to abortion a bit presumptuous. It has been and remains a point of contention within the libertarian ideology… “do whatever you want as long as you aren’t harming anyone”… abortion substantially pushes the bounds of that, or at least leaves ample room for debate.
@Justin_Beaver5646 ай бұрын
It's a private property issue. Your body is your private property and not the government's. Private property is essential to a free society. Objectivists and Libertarians understand this concept.
@paulsnow6 ай бұрын
@Justin_Beaver564 So the babies don't have private property rights? The government has no right to protect a human life from its mother? Plenty of libertarians oppose abortion for this reason. It is not so clear cut.
@JohnKerbaugh6 ай бұрын
@@paulsnowdiscussion of Rights circles back to when you should recognize them which is the core of the dispute. When should the government intervene inside a woman's or anyone's body? Whose rights supersede the other, in a thousand scenarios? When does consciousness begin? Does someone on kidney dialysis right to life supersede someone they could abduct and take their kidneys? If the government has the right to intervene inside someone's body, why couldn't it do so for any number of causes?
@marynewsom60376 ай бұрын
“Thank you for Andy Levying me.” 😂 love the Red Eye throwback!
@SamuelStoudt6 ай бұрын
In the vast world of podcasting Peter might be the most irritating human I have ever heard.
@dbassman276 ай бұрын
I'm a Canadian, (and believe me, we have our fair share of problems), but to say I'm aghast at what is happening in America would be a considerable understatement. You guys are in serious trouble right now.
@darthvader65336 ай бұрын
How exactly is this different from previous history
@dbassman276 ай бұрын
@@darthvader6533 I don't think I have yet witnessed the amount of collusion between the Dems, the elites, the MSM etc in order to get Biden out and their candidate in. Matt and Walter have covered this extensively, and IMHO, are two of the few who have the courage to tell the truth about what is really going on.
@TugHillGuy6 ай бұрын
I used to watch a lot more baseball when I was younger and I remember hearing Jim Leyland's last name repeatedly pronounced "Lee-land" and not "Lay-land."
@Anderson333336 ай бұрын
What part of the 11 page federal constitution of "few and defined powers" gives Congress the power to make laws on abortion? To just say Congress has the power to make laws and impose it upon the states is to ignore the Constitution as a meaningful document and abolish the concept of federalism. It's true that the radicals in both sides would prefer to impose their view on everyone everywhere. But this is actually a power play not a reflection of rights anymore than they are willing to wage war on the entire world to impose the same. Separate from the Constitution of limited power there is no right to govern other people and other states. Just a separate from the right to wage war on other nations there is no right to govern people and other nations. You cannot expect to have freedom without law.
@SunTingWong6 ай бұрын
Where did cancel culture come from? One symptom of TDS is short term memory loss. Trump first mentioned no tax on tips a month or so back. He said a waitress gave him the idea.
@excellentcomment6 ай бұрын
Have you seen the $5 bill on which someone has written in red ink, "Vote Trump no tax on tips"?
@tvh3006 ай бұрын
Great conversation, thanks for sharing. Also, ReasonTV needs more of Katherine's perspectives. Always interesting to hear thoughts on topics.
@phenom5686 ай бұрын
So what exactly is Reasons defense of abortion? Nick says its an individual right but what about the second individual? At least the first individual in most cases made a conscience decision to create the 2nd individual. If your argument is that its not an individual, its a clump of cells, then does that mean someone can kill it and they should not be held accountable? When does it become an individual? If you say "at birth" then why isn't "viability out of the womb" not an equally viable answer? If it is, then you must be in favor of an abortion ban at some point. And before someone accuses me of something I'm not, I don't consider myself pro anything. I find the idea of abortion abhorrent but I don't see a viable way to police it. Throwing pregnant woman in jail until they give birth is not an option for obvious reasons. I consider abortion a societal failure that should be addressed via a change in the culture not through the power of the state.
@pwhqngl0evzeg7z376 ай бұрын
This is a tricky question honestly and I was thinking of it a bit on the way home, and I have some assorted thoughts. One frame could be that the unborn is less of an individual, which makes some intuitive sense to me, especially early term, though it's a rather brutal position. Another that I'm leaning more towards is the idea of parental rights- in variably controversial cases like school choice and gender-affirming care, I think it makes sense to defer to parents, who know their children best, so I would apply the same idea to abortion; a mother likewise knows best the fitness of her household for raising the child etc. That might be called the principaled answer- another might be consequentialist, along the classic lines of Prohibition Doesn't Work; if you want to prevent alcoholism, you don't outlaw alcohol. Abortion is very bad and should never happen, but I don't think outlawing it will make it less frequent or safer.
@JackVz6 ай бұрын
as a man i don't want to pull out or pay child support so that's my justification
@Essy3116 ай бұрын
@@pwhqngl0evzeg7z37 I think when considering parental rights, it must be in the context of parental duty. When parents don't provide basic life-sustaining care to their children, their rights are removed. The issue of abortion is more akin to the parental duty to feed your children, clothe your children, and not kill your children than it is to the parental rights issue of school choice.
@Justin_Beaver5646 ай бұрын
Why are you conservatives here?
@JackVz6 ай бұрын
@@Justin_Beaver564 liberalism needs restraint and reason to work or it becomes a backwards and dystopian death cult like Germany and Russia
@frankbieser6 ай бұрын
Speaking as a Texan, GW Bush was a good governor only in that he wasn't governor very long. For over a century, there was a tradition for people to publicly protest around the block of the Governor's mansion (a few blocks from the state capital). GW ended that, and to this day, state troopers are posted around each corner of the square block of downtown real estate the mansion sits on to prevent protestors from assembling anywhere near the mansion.
@payleryder456 ай бұрын
Do you think there is a particular value in protesting a public figure at the place that he sleeps and where his children live as opposed to his office?
@frankbieser6 ай бұрын
@@payleryder45 For the average citizen sleeping in their own private property? Of course not. But for a politician sleeping in a house paid for by the tax payers where there was 100+ year old tradition of allowing protest around it? Absolutely. I would argue a very important value if you value a (relatively) free society.
@payleryder456 ай бұрын
@@frankbieser I suppose my question gets to this point - is your purpose to communicate a political position to the government official, or is it to keep him from sleeping and to terrify his young children?
@frankbieser6 ай бұрын
@@payleryder45 You're missing the point my friend. This is the sort of thing politicians sign up for when they decide to run and take political office. If they don't want to expose their family to the ugly side of politics, they should do something else. And as I pointed out, 100+ years of Texas governors tolerated it just fine, understanding the principle at stake. It's not like protestors were out there at all hours of the night with bull horns. They were largely just standing around with signs complaining about him during the day. GW didn't like the optics when those protests were on TV, so he put an end to it claiming it was a security problem.
@macsnafu6 ай бұрын
"Matt Welch is leaving as I say this!" ;-)
@darthvader65336 ай бұрын
Calling the consistent, constant desire to limit murder as radical or knee jerk is wild to me
@TugHillGuy6 ай бұрын
I live about an hour and 40 minutes from the Baseball Hall of Fame, but have not yet been there. I'd like to go there at some point - maybe for next year's induction ceremony.
@99guspuppet86 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ at moments I love everyone of them and especially Nick
@obieserious6 ай бұрын
34:00 Safe, legal, and rare. Heard.
@payleryder456 ай бұрын
That was the lie that they told thirty years ago when people were more morally serious so that they could still get elected. Now they're going to demand drive-thru late term abortions paid for my Medicare for All TM.
@innernouter6 ай бұрын
Reason is a dumpster fire. Bunch of kids in the smoking section repeating to each other " this sh*t sucks". Nice job Nick, fantastic leadership.
@toomanycatsfive6 ай бұрын
Exactly. And maybe libertarians weren’t referenced or appealed to at the RNC b/c they’ve increasingly made themselves irrelevant as a political movement. And I say this as someone who has strong libertarian ideological leanings.
@William-B6 ай бұрын
KMW’s rant at 2:50 is 🤌
@oswarz6 ай бұрын
Not any Democrat? Yes there is. The fools should have let RFK, Jr. take the mantle! He's more like them than they realize.
@joericher106 ай бұрын
Ummm - off topic but...I was taken aback by your ad for Senolytic. Here I thought libertarians were opposed to the use of force and fraud. Don't you feel your reputations are worth more than this? Matt spoke the ad but no one demurred. My trust in you all has gone down. It's not lost yet...
@smotpoker816 ай бұрын
Jim LEE-lind
@payleryder456 ай бұрын
Does Reason have any purpose other than as a public mutual masturbation society for people with strange personal lives and aristocratic pretensions?
@keith629706 ай бұрын
Nothing makes sense anymore.
@edkalski23126 ай бұрын
Didn't Kamala solve the border crisis?
@payleryder456 ай бұрын
I think they're going to go with "It wasn't her responsibility, and even if it was, there is no crisis, and even if there is a crisis, those people coming over the border are good actually and also shut up."
@GeraldHanks-qo1qc5 ай бұрын
Yes she is 100% the blame for opening the border, nothing but TREASON