Thank you for making this video. I'm strugling with my chemistry exam. This helped me a lot :).
@Carbaminohemoglobin2 жыл бұрын
yo how can you watch this while taking your chemistry exam 💀
@AS-lj5yu Жыл бұрын
@@Carbaminohemoglobin lmfaoo
@dramoyoedward92292 жыл бұрын
Everything is very clear and well understood!!
@lellam-z9l Жыл бұрын
God bless you sir
@whynot53318 ай бұрын
It's amazing how they conveyed the concept 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻in just first 4 min
@UgwuwnyiMichael21 күн бұрын
1st year medical student here🇳🇬🇳🇬
@ronberasa58689 ай бұрын
Thank You. Very well done..!!
@commonomics10 ай бұрын
that was actually really helpful
@henriemate8 ай бұрын
I was having trouble understanding this, thanks
@EMNE-zi322 күн бұрын
TnX! I have an exam tomorrow.
@fequalsmalol Жыл бұрын
yo bro thanks a lot man
@mrzombie4573 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much.This helped me a lot 😭😭
@karthikkeyansmk272710 ай бұрын
i have a doubt that in the given example at the beginning, sir you said according to le chatlier principle the system moves towards the equilibrium. in first container there are 4 chlorine in dissociate form and 4 chlorine in precipitate form,but after the system distrub and move to equilibrium, 3 chlorine in dissociate form and 6 chlorine in precipiate it is not a equilibrium at all pardon explain me
@Winternightsknight2 ай бұрын
In the 3rd container where equilibrium is established there us a increase in amount of PbCl2 which means 2 Cl ions combine with 1 Pb ion to form that(keeping in mind mole ratio) so we are left with 2 Cl remaining with 1 Pb + K ion with it's dissociate Cl ion
@MasterCivilEngineering3 жыл бұрын
Master in engineering here🇺🇸
@elizabethelson11242 жыл бұрын
Thank you 😁🙏
@spurti3 жыл бұрын
Could you make a video on prefixes and suffixes of all the functional groups based on their priority!!🥰
@princesiddiki73543 жыл бұрын
I have a doubt Should it be Ksp=X(4X²+0.1)? Plz clear that for me
@julcernine3 жыл бұрын
4X² is avoidable as the value is too small
@theamazing41762 жыл бұрын
he ignored to write (0.1+2X) from the beginning cuz 0.1+2X is approximately equal 0.1 since 2X is a very small number comparative to 0.1 but he couldn't do that for the X cuz we only ignore something when it's very small comparative to the other thing hope that it become clear for you bro😅😅
@julcernine2 жыл бұрын
@@مُغلق-ي2م لا أخ. انا لست عربيا. فقط اسمي باللغة العربية. 🤣🤣🤣🫂🥺😞
@julcernine2 жыл бұрын
@@مُغلق-ي2م انا من بنجلاديش. انا لا اتكلم العربية. لقد استخدمت مترجمًا عبر الإنترنت😛🙃. من أين أنت؟
@julcernine2 жыл бұрын
@@مُغلق-ي2م باهر. شكرا لك ايضا)) 😌
@abhinavneupane93502 ай бұрын
nobody couldve explained better
@mayukhpurkayastha26493 жыл бұрын
Sir you invented my imagined machine Shakti Prokriya Karan yantra or power acceptor large yantra or machines. This power acceptor help new type quantum computer