🦋 The longer the better!! Love your videos. I’m very thankful you helped me see that I am not R/TR but soft dramatic, in your consultation❤ Pleeeease make a long one on soft dramatic. 🦋🦋🦋🦋
@gabrielle.j5 ай бұрын
🦋 can’t wait for SG! I’m always stuck between these two!
@inez51104 ай бұрын
Same as well!!! 🦋
@javandithirulojan41013 ай бұрын
Same 😅. And soft natural tooo. I'm 156cm
@morro87855 ай бұрын
Who would skip the vid before the end? 🦋💕
@denisagrosu30614 ай бұрын
I have watched so many videos about the TR body type, but this is the only one that resolved all of my uncertainty. Now I know I’m actually a SC. Thank you!
@ddsbread56735 ай бұрын
This was great! You are THE BEST at explaining Kibbe! 🦋
@annasanders19773 ай бұрын
🦋Thank you for explaining TR so well!!
@Joelle-qq1vt5 ай бұрын
I'll watch anything you post about this body type 😁 Thank you
@welltrying5 ай бұрын
🦋 Love all of your videos. Hoping you do an SN video soon!
@ashleynicole94235 ай бұрын
My eye is not trained for this type. I think I need more comparison maybe? Great video as always! 🦋🦋🦋
@collardgreens805 ай бұрын
🦋 Great video! As always
@missj7945 ай бұрын
🦋I love this series, I'm eliminating types that I thought I might be with each video.💕
@AngelaCelesteMay5 ай бұрын
Hi. Thank you for sharing this information. I am enjoying learning about this system. From what I understand, for each body type Kibbe prefaced by saying that slight deviations from the descriptions do not mean a person is not that particular body type since it is the overall combination of physical descriptors together with essence. I believe his words were something like, "A slight deviation from the following characteristics is always possible and should not be worried over as long as it does not upset the overall combination of yin and yang" So if the arms for example, are a little longer that does not mean a person is not a Theatrical Romantic. Also, in an interview I believe Salma Hayek confirmed that she has not had any breast augmentation. Instead, she stated that her chest became larger due to menopause. This is entirely possible as I have known many women in my own life for whom this occurs. Peace.
@stylebysophianicole5 ай бұрын
I agree about arms! But Salma’s chest has been growing since her 20s, and many plastic surgeons have analysed her and all concluded that it’s most likely implants. Celebrities are rarely honest about what procedures they’ve had unfortunately.
@AngelaCelesteMay5 ай бұрын
@@stylebysophianicoleYes, good point, after all we don't actually know these people so it is certainly possible that she had implants despite her denials. As someone who has never had any work done, yet have had some people mistakenly assume that I have, I know that even plastic surgeons can get it wrong sometimes. This is particularly true when they are attempting to diagnose from a distance having never actually examined her in person. They are making educated guesses from a distance. They might be correct, but they might not. In either case, I wish you continued success.
@Sophia-nd1qi3 ай бұрын
That was a great explanation, thank you🦋🦋🌻
@Lu-bk1qq5 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video! I believe I am a theatrical romantic and this was helpful 🦋
@Vocodes5 ай бұрын
🦋 Very helpful, I keep coming back to theatrical romantic but have doubts because I'm squarely 5"5' and a half.... I don't think I have vertical but I'm always vexed by the height limit. Is half an inch really too much?? I think I need to save up and just see Kibbe himself!
@stylebysophianicole5 ай бұрын
I would say that for TR, SG and FG, the half an inch matters. In the case of TR it’s because they are supposed to be even smaller than R while still having some yang. Height is yang, so if you already have yang in your bone structure and then you add the height to it, it’s more yang than TR would have.
@iellybeeАй бұрын
🦋 Your voice is so relaxing!
@ijmimi91865 ай бұрын
Well done 🦋
@joyceadena5 ай бұрын
Finally about that Rihanna point love this video already!
@kristengilbert97495 ай бұрын
🦋 Thanks for another great video!
@kristiluce28382 ай бұрын
🦋 I am still slightly confused. I have a small childlike bone structure, narrow shoulders, and smaller bust, but I have always had soft flesh and I am 5'6".
@stylebysophianicole2 ай бұрын
This sounds like it could be soft dramatic!
@avery_34795 ай бұрын
🦋 Thank you for making this series!
@yinuofang5 ай бұрын
🦋all your videos have been very helpful
@hopeperlman82605 ай бұрын
Hello! I enjoyed this all the way to the end!
@gateetafeliz448313 күн бұрын
🦋 Not long at all! Thank you for breaking it down. I think I am a Theatrical Romantic 💘? 5’ 2”, narrow frame, hourglass with double curve. Balanced facial features more dominant in yin with full lips, small almond eyes, sharply cheekbones, angular jaw. But I have this question, people always assume I am taller than I am. I also have longer arms than most. Does that mean I have perceived verticality? And does that qualify me as a soft gamine with a double curve? My facial features are not boyish and I look best with long hair, in very feminine styles.
@Aphrodite777983 ай бұрын
The movie tip was such a nice bonus!
@YumeraChauque5 ай бұрын
I think a good way to distinguish Tr to Sn is the shoulders and ribcage,if the upper part is indeniable large,probably you are soft natural, teatrical romantics tend to have problems with dresses because sometimes is too large in the shoulders area.
@ivy-fo3bx5 ай бұрын
So helpful, thank you! 🦋
@irisellie51395 ай бұрын
If I may ask - what is the difference between "lush" R curve, "trim curves" for TR, and "crisp curves" for SG?
@stylebysophianicole4 ай бұрын
Lush curves are full and round while trim curves are narrow. The crisp curves for SG refers to clothing silhouette with some sharply defined points, it’s not a body description!
@irisellie51394 ай бұрын
@@stylebysophianicole oh!! Thank you, that clears up things
@helenfitch65902 ай бұрын
How can you tell when someone is overweight? All the curves are lush because....overweight.
@evat77235 ай бұрын
🦋 this was great, very informative
@heatherinde4 ай бұрын
🦋 This was a great explanation. Thank you.
@giulias.51042 ай бұрын
Very clear explanation, thank you! I am one, larger hips and petite top with straight shoulders, medium bone structure and short limbs (ahimè! 😅) curly hair, lot of yin energy (Venus is my Sign's Lord and my ascendant'Lord as well), full lips etc. Thank you! ❤🦋
@TinaB.-fr1hl5 ай бұрын
💞BUTTERFLY! (there's no butterfly emoji on my fire tablet!😏,so I thought I'd type it)
@YumeraChauque5 ай бұрын
9:26 wow,I never realize that mila cunis and that sc lady are alike😮.
@law90515 ай бұрын
Hope you do Soft Natural next! Love you're videos!!
@HeatherH.Benjamin5 ай бұрын
🦋 thank you!
@ladykadiijha5 ай бұрын
Thank you ❤❤
@lisbethgrace-112 ай бұрын
Butterfly 🦋
@t0ast3r_wat3r22 ай бұрын
🦋Im definitely this
@АннаЛиза-р3й3 ай бұрын
Can you help me maybe? I'm 164cm. I'm not overweight but I'm midsize. I have a huge bust, a flatter tummy but not too thinn waist and proportional hips. I have a huge butt too and thick thighs but not too thick arms. My legs aren't really long and my arms are proportional in length. I have slim feet with longer toes and my palms are normal in size but I have extremely long, slim and bony fingers. My face shape is oval and on the softer side. My face is freshy with soft and fleshy button nose. My eyes aren't too big and normal sizes. I have a long neck. I think that everything about me looks rather rounded but my hands and feet stand out on that softness. My frame is also not slim but rather normal a slightly wide
@patrycjam.64605 ай бұрын
🦋How is that even possible to skip your video?! I've been considering my body as a theatrical romantic... I've read that face is not important in body typing and you should look only at the body. If a face is still considered, I'm 100% sure I'm not a Tr 😊I can't wait to see the next video. Hope it's coming soon 😊
@arlainastarks05033 ай бұрын
For the longest I thought I was a SD, but now I’m realizing I’m a TR. I’m not vertical enough to be a SD and my flesh is too soft to be a Classic or a natural, but my bone structure is too angular to be a Pure romantic. My body also doesn’t align with any of the Gamine types at all.
@TheSienna292 ай бұрын
You have a TR face
@ormedanim5 ай бұрын
I don't understand this arbitrary height limit of 165cm. I am 169cm but don't fit into any other body type except TR. Do these 4cm obliterate EVERYTHING else?
@stylebysophianicole5 ай бұрын
At 169 cm you have at least some literal length in your body and length is a yang feature! A TR is first and foremost someone with narrow and short bones, past a certain height the bones just won’t be short anymore. I wouldn’t say it’s arbitrary, it seems to have its basis in garment construction, I will eventually make a video on that.
@winxclubstellamusaАй бұрын
5’6.5” is tall! You must be a type of dramatic if you are narrow and delicate, yet yang.
@Lalaland0995 ай бұрын
What’s the tall version of theatrical romantic?
@lenka1565 ай бұрын
SD?
@manicmala36175 ай бұрын
🦋😃 Great video, thank you!
@EstrellaRatonPerez5 ай бұрын
🦋🦋
@margies7355 ай бұрын
🦋 on point
@avery_34795 ай бұрын
I hope I don't bother you, but what image id do you think Brigitte Bardot is? I've seen her typed as Soft Gamine on verified lists, but to me she seems to have too much elongation to be in the Gamine family. I suspect her being a Flamboyant Natural because many of her looks include color blocking and open necklines accompanied by long volumunous hair.
@stylebysophianicole5 ай бұрын
She is indeed a verified SG! Which I agree with, assuming she isn’t taller than 5’5. If not SG, I’d go with SN over FN.
@avery_34795 ай бұрын
@@stylebysophianicole Thank you for your take!
@autumnleaves-774 ай бұрын
🦋 can a Theatrical Romantic have a long neck? Im not tall only 5'3 but have a long neck
@stylebysophianicole4 ай бұрын
I don’t think the neck affects anything!
@MsMerlin3335 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊
@TheGillvanas5 ай бұрын
🦋
@estherwilliams70055 ай бұрын
Butterfly 🦋🦋🦋
@janaraiman6944 ай бұрын
well done
@Lalaland0995 ай бұрын
I don’t see short limbs. I don’t understand do you compare short women to tall women or do you look at their body ratio. Kibbe seems underdeveloped.
@EverlastingHeartKeepsakes4 ай бұрын
Right? The limbs don’t look short on the example celebs to me.
@Phofia5 ай бұрын
🦋🦋🦋
@kreator14745 ай бұрын
🦋Great video, thank you! I also have a question. Do you type underweight people? Like really really underweight, not just skinny..😅
@stylebysophianicole5 ай бұрын
Yes, weight shouldn’t be a problem since IDs don’t change with weight!
@ladykadiijha5 ай бұрын
🦋 🦋 🦋
@cheryl80694 ай бұрын
Hmmm....I'm curious... could the ideas about being wide or narrow be specific to regions/ethnicities? I'm East and Southeast Asian and all the women shown in this video as having narrow frames don't look narrow to me, they look normal and slightly broad. I'm surrounded here by women of various heights who are a lot narrower.
@bfrederick29835 ай бұрын
💜🦋
@chrystallized88865 ай бұрын
🦋🦋🦋🦋
@arlettasloan6453Ай бұрын
Yeah. Here is the thing. I am wide in the shoulder, narrow in the hip, taller than 5'5" and continually getting a Theatrical Romantic score. A-2 B-3 C-1 D-7 E-2 An overwhelming D, in total. When I am at my right weight, I have quite a small waist but huge shoulders and I am someone that always looks wider, more substantial, than other women. Yet, I am primarily D. So, theatrical romantic with some natural, ethereal (dramatic), further romantic and a teeny bit of classic essence. My feet are not small, I am not diminuitive. But, I don't fit anywhere else nearly as well. So, now what? I mean, according to many people who teach such methods of sorting yourself out, fashion-wise, it is not that you fit exactly into the one type/essence but that you fit more into it than any other. I suppose I could be wrong with some D answers and I am mostly E, but I don't know how I could go further in my wrongness than that. Because , I definitely do not have an elongated torso or a boyish body, wide chest, large hands, etc. And, I know I would look good in a lot of Theatrical Romantic clothes. I have before!
@stylebysophianicoleАй бұрын
Kibbe has said that the quiz doesn’t work so don’t let it confuse you! Most people incorrectly get theatrical romantic or soft classic, I believe he said his publisher wanted him to include a quiz because they were popular back then but it turned out it wasn’t working at all.
@Flippinger5 ай бұрын
🦋👍💜
@txabalita012 ай бұрын
I'm tall but fleshy
@Sunmoon08-7729 күн бұрын
Selena looks like SN to me. Tall and broadness, which is opposite To the theatrical romantic .
@prettynena31024 ай бұрын
🦋thank you so much! I just verified I am a theatrical romantic girl❤
@Daiseehead2 ай бұрын
I can always “see” most of the TRs, but for some reason I have such a hard time seeing Selena Gomez and Mila Kunis.
@TheSienna292 ай бұрын
Selena is way too tall and Kunis is too straight in the torso.