She turned the tables even after the judge gave her her a hard time

[@LCplLudwig]

What do you mean sustained shes right. Your only argument is the drone operator cant be identified by photo like a soldier on the ground can which makes this a PR stunt.

[@WickedWeaseification]

That part of the scene was nonsensical altogether. An objection must be followed by the type of objection it is before a ruling by the judge. i.e. Hearsay, Speculation, or in this particular case, Testifying. That could be a sustainable objection with the way she phrased the question and it would be up to the judge to decide. Considering this judge's attitude, I doubt any objection would've been overruled.

[@KahnSig]

​@@WickedWeaseification I know in some jurisdictions they just have you Object without the underlying reason. But for most cases yeah

[@KingMovie100]

It feels like an attempt to attract attentions

[@JayGoTexas]

We can just randomly say objection?????? 🧐Objection..... for what🤔???? 👩‍⚖️that doesn't matter im sustaining it....⚖️

[@JasperJanssen]

@@WickedWeaseificationand if it was an objection for testifying, the “I think the jury understands” should by all rights have gotten her a month in jail for contempt.

[@pedrojm13]

I “hate” to say this but being an Army vet in Iraq, I will never see drone operators in US as “part of the battlefield.” Sorry guys. At least the Navy is in water close by offering support. But being able to go home every day, is not a deployment.

[@TheLitRight]

Even the Navy are in danger. Just ask the Russian ship that was sank off the coast of Ukraine. Drone operators are glorified video game players - they’re as much “veterans” as a Call of Duty player, but with even less credibility because at least the CoD player earned their killstreak. There is a zero percent chance these guys would ever be fired upon by the enemy. They’ve got more casualties to crack whores on the strip than from jihadi’s in the Middle East.

[@garlord43]

I get that sentiment but I got a hard time agreeing hole hearted with you because by that rationale Air Force pilots would be in the same field as drone pilots since they arnt in the direct fight right ?

[@theskirata7034]

@@garlord43A fighter jet pilot on deployment doesn’t just drive home at the end of the day, does he?

[@rj8579]

​@@garlord43 tf you talking about? Airforce pilots literally flies their jets to the battlefield and drops whatever they have to on it. They even have a slight chance of having a dog fight with the other country's pilots. And they definitely don't just drive their car going to work and back home everyday.

[@garlord43]

@@rj8579 well if we use our brains for anything more than a second u could probably understand what I ment. I’m talking about the similarities between them not being directly on the battlefield as compared to marines army navy which have feet on the ground. I simply asked if because they weren’t on the ground in the belly of wars like the other branches wouldn’t they be under the same view.

[@thegimpygamer]

If I remember right the Air Force chick was high when she killed them. It isn't so much a accident as negligence

[@IVibratorz]

Yeah and killed like a dozen people while high as fuck. This whole episode was her using the 'she was a woman' argument to get her off. Then got ripped into by the female JAG judge for making all woman in the military look bad for this.

[@janschnell2217]

Still no different than deployed personnel that need "stimulation through doctors" they are most likely all high while killing people of different skin colors

[@muhammad-dq6jg]

WOW. WOULD IT WORK THE OTHER WAY?

[@skleemike]

She wasn't "high" - but was basically taking "adderall" (like much of her colleague) to get her through long back to back shifts

[@BalticLab]

You'd be surprised to find out that accidents also can happen when you're high. Otherwise being high might be an excellent accident prevention. :-D

[@jackwyatt4184]

I work construction in 2002.we Built The hangers that that the drones were parked in. That was in creech nevada I also built the building in Nellis Air force base Las Vegas that the operator's worked in to fly the drones worldwide. I'm retired now but I sure did love construction. I miss it.

[@YayaSinwar-d1g]

😂😂😂 the most tone deaf, besides the point, missing the forest for the trees , completely inane comment My God , either your as empty as a cave up there or you're one of them Islamaphobes. 😅 My God how could anyone start to fantasizs about building drone hangars under this video 😂😂😂. Talking about dead civilian's, must be one of them "war is hell" , Geno supporters

[@charafdine1345]

Yeah I think you shouldn't disclose that info though 😂🤣

[@boogierhea6515]

I also think you shouldn't share that info, surprised how it's still up since it's possible national security, just like a lot of other people who feels need to share our bases or location of assets for our foe's to get, my great grandfather was in both navy and army and wouldn't talk about anything he did that he was known as possible national security risk, or something secret or top secret even after the half a decade rules of declassified information.just food for thought thanks for your service and support to our nation

[@dough9512]

Were you paid combat pay?

[@kathleenschaefer7012]

​@@boogierhea6515 Those three dots to the upper right side allow You to report things you think are inappropriate for what ever reason.

[@Oldguy9302]

“ I think the jury gets to the point” The way that the judge would grant a mistrial with a new jury would make that woman’s head spin

[@AaronBaker-g8g]

It’s a tribunal it’s a gd court martial not civilian court all the judges would have to agree and only one took offense and even if the one who did she can’t just order the others to declare a mistrial please do some damn research before you speak

[@Oldguy9302]

@ I was a paralegal for JAG for 23 years. One judge can absolutely order a mistrial. It does not have to be unanimous in that case that the overseer is upset. If you pissed off the head honcho, guess what. They absolutely supersede the rest of them. That’s why there’s a head judge. You’re not just wrong. You’re stupid.

[@Oldguy9302]

@ I was a paralegal for Jag for over 20 years. You’re not just wrong, you’re completely ignorant of the procedure. The head of the court martial i.e., the overseer, is the only person with the authority to declare a mistrial with prejudice, that does not need the approval of the other members.

[@antoniocalderon3190]

The judge doesn’t even try to hide her bias.

[@suitdark3]

What season and episode is

[@thementlegent9592]

Tell me you don’t understand how the military uses drone pilots without telling me you don’t understand how drone pilots are used.

[@22espec]

Wow, Captain Kirk would have hated this kind of war wherr you can go to your job sit around for a few hours killing enemies and then return to your house

[@wirebrushproductions1001]

It's only different in scale from WW2 bomber crews who could destroy a city, return to base, and then spend time at the pub.

[@22espec]

@wirebrushproductions1001 obviously you only saw the movies and tvshows about them but those from bombardment crews have more PTSD that any other soldier in the war, many developed alcoholism problems. Some may argue that's the reason the drone program.should exist yet at the same time, an easier way to make war has born.

[@johncasianos4796]

She killed innocent people, while the military prosecution were going about it the wrong way, the accused did indeed kill innocent people. She was guilty.

[@Usernam321]

Above saw she was high AF and did it. Not the as an accidentally death due to circumstances beyond their control

[@thepacifist702]

All American soldiers are guilty. Each of them. Terrorists.

[@donder172]

Pretty sure that's a warcrime. Shouldn't that be dealt by a military court?

[@canyonblue737-8]

It is a military court. The judge and jury are all military.

[@mdaiken82]

You can’t even see their prejudice beyond your own prejudice!!! Constitutional traitor is what you are called!

[@minnesotasteve]

It depends.

[@robinnico7564]

what court do you think this is genius?

[@Nightfighter82]

It is a military court. You are entitled to a civilian lawyer if you can afford one.

[@DennisWaweru-zq5cf]

Name of the movie?

[@csocseszrocsesz]

It's a series, The Good Wife.

[@santhini1296]

Why is it that we cant get any dramas like this through our cable network!!! M still watching superwoman!!!!

[@pavamanabhyudhay9481]

Which series is this

[@KingMovie100]

Follow my account to see

[@KingMovie100]

@@pavamanabhyudhay9481the good wife

[@nateleonard5882]

Hardly anything is on cable anymore. Got to get streaming services

[@djs12007]

@@pavamanabhyudhay9481 This is "The Good Wife" and it played on CBS for 5 seasons.

[@azmattasaduq-oi5rf]

Name of the series

[@jonasnielsen2914]

The good wife

[@franzbuhlmann1099]

Command rank in the military feel entitled to do as they please, at any time! That is one reason there were so many officers lost in wars like Vietnam due to friendly fire! They will never learn. The only time the military cries foul is when the enemy uses the same tactics!

[@ampm9771]

But americans never make a movie how they staged regime change in Iran in 1979 and how US Airforce General Huyser flew to Tehran jn 1979 to oversee the regime change and total destruction of Iran.

[@OGSynGaming]

I do have coworkers that went to Iran about 20 to almost 30 years ago and they hated the commands from the US because all they did was recover oild rigged sites

[@brianhildreth9099]

There are definitely glaring omissions, partial truths and edited time lines, when it comes to western stories and films set in 1979 Iran... I'm far from an expert, just a history sponge. Unfortunately, from a young age, most kids, no matter what country they are raised in, are taught history through rose colored glasses and/or biased sources... The gritty, dark, tragic truths are rarely told. Which is mainly why history tends to repeat itself. It's not just America though. Fortunately, at least for those of us that WANT the truth and want to learn, there are writers and documentaries these days that are trying to bring us that. They aren't Hollywood Blockbusters, but they're out there. I wish more people cared, but they don't.

[@YayaSinwar-d1g]

​@@brianhildreth9099 good job with the aboutism 😂😂😂😂😂

[@YayaSinwar-d1g]

Or central American countries around the same time 😮😮😮 It's ok , what goes around come around

[@Sayitlikitiz101]

America doesn't need to destroy Iran. Its people are doing a fine job on their own. Also, please have some self-accountability. Take care of your own sh*t.

[@safiremorningstar]

I think this is an episode of The Good wife but I'd still like paragraph person to come and tell me the story including the ending.

[@derekc2425]

Think this was one of the earlier cases, which is why she only looked at the gender card and not the omfg thing her client did.

[@franky7872]

The judge sure seemed like she was rolling some papers

[@sniffles8655]

The judge is insufferable in this entire episode.

[@therajajogtherishi]

What show?

[@m.abhishekvarma3655]

The good wife

[@ronaldkasujja1590]

Which movie is this?

[@Pewpewpew99]

Suits S3E11

[@ronaldkasujja1590]

@@Pewpewpew99 why do you lie? I don't know this part in suits

[@csocseszrocsesz]

The Good Wife

[@ArnoldPalmer-c7u]

The good wife

[@jurgenmarx4082]

I don't like it when videos are mirrored, it's a sign of incom****nce.

[@mrroboshadow]

Ah yes kangaroo courts Ya put on the show but the award has already been given out

[@louisemillerdasa5210]

Being charged alone 😔 because you pulled the trigger accidentally 😒 is disgusting 🫣. Merritt mustn't be denied on the military court 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 part 2,3,4,5-10 please 🙏 🙄

[@Usernam321]

Wtf are you talking about? She did it high as fuck. Pulling the trigger due to your own decision making (in her case self impaired/negligent) is not the same as doing say as a result of being given direct order to do so. Brain dead/bot comment

[@ricardovasques293]

HOW MANY OF THIS SO CALLED DONEPILOTS ARE NOT IN THE FEAL THAT BOMB KILLED AND WATCH KILLING AND STILL NOT THERE BUT STILL HAVE PTSD AND HIS LIFE DESTROYED?????? TOO MANY WORK WITH THE BRAINS ITS THE SAME THEY SEE THE SAME FEAL THE SAME BUT ITS JUST GAMERS ISINT SHAMEFUL!!!!

[@DAGREATBOOG]

Why the fuck were we in Afghanistan is the question

[@jamesedmond3351]

So baby bush and trickey dick cheney, could make mega-large bank. Just like his daddy bush made large bank, in Kuwait.

[@096_raqeebhaque8]

can somebody explain the context behind this scene

[@paulheydarian1281]

Just watch the show for yourself.

[@elianmustafa]

​@@paulheydarian1281what's the name of the show

[@gaminglife701]

Hold every innocent civilian death accountable. Treat every human fairly. Don't sweep it under the rug like others before, instead dig out the previous cases. This show is portraying wrong ideology

[@AB-ov1zm]

Propaganda 101 justifying civilian killings

[@King_of_69s]

Not really in the episode the woman still ends up prosecuted but the show clearly tries to treat it as the reason is she is a woman

[@ReDWaVemoopsy]

A woman or not ,12 people died because of her and 6 of them were children

[@ReDWaVemoopsy]

Ah she was on drugs too 😂

[@FGJasper]

The judge getting mad over the truth?

[@jlaufangyt]

Railroaded into a kangaroo court

[@charlesfinney180]

She was impaired while operating the drones😢

[@rudyvargas9518]

That judge is grumpy..

[@jamesedmond3351]

She hasn't been getting her tube steak lately.

[@AwethentiquePtyLtd]

Militaries of the world would save so much lives and money if they all had to do their battles and wars in Call of Duty

[@bradguthrie1941]

Original Star Trek, Season 1, episode 23. A Taste of Armageddon. Computerized war between two planets.

[@AbE-z3n]

"someone else did bad things too and dont got a punishment therefore nobody should ever be punished" is that her arguement? these shows and their non existing logic....

[@jackiemowery5243]

Lawyers don't use logic. They do/say whatever they need to to win their case.

[@Iamashadowwitch]

That is the thing about the law or at least the court unless someone can come up with this argument or something similar during the trial the jurors will think her point makes sense and will rule in her favor as long as it kinda makes sense and there is no point against it it's good enough that's why people even do public trials with jurors cause they aren't trained to see all the directions as a judge hopefully is and can be kinda tricked into agreeing with the accused

[@Reaper-bd9bl]

I think she was trying to say her client isn't being given the same level of leeway as others on the battlefield. Things do happen on the battlefield that unfortunately lead to accidental deaths. You can't always make the right call. Idk what the details of this case were, so I've no idea if the argument is reasonable or not.

[@houstoneuler]

It's called selective prosecution, which is an abusive form of discrimination

[@NixonAngelo]

Y'all are funny. Arguing over a hypothetical imaginary TV show about who's more important and who's more dangerous😅

[@vortec2k2]

This show has so many things wrong with it.

[@juliosegura1970]

SUUCH A GREAT SHOW

[@kierstyrubyhendrix6978]

The music on this video clip is way too loud! In video production, the music is supposed to support the words, not dominate them!

[@XDemNotYetARep]

The music is to avoid getting the clip taken down by KZbin due to copyrights that’s why is at higher volume.

[@romanewilliams9563]

A sword has two sharp sides!

[@TheKrispyfort]

No, not all swords are made with two live edges.

[@jamesedmond3351]

depends on the sword.

[@yunsha9986]

Bch thinks he's the lincoln lawyer or Harvey Specter

[@tracyessig5980]

She lost the case

[@utiub86]

"accidentally"

[@lorenmoore1416]

Mirror image video.

[@abdulayesha-o2u]

Episode and season

[@VSastrocompasss]

Adult. Many men and women. :f

[@annie9924]

Sadly, these military women have to be like this to get respect in this men's world.

[@nduduzoblose4355]

They don't have to be But they choose to be There are many ways to gain respect

[@celestialveins]

And we're supposed to pretend she'd still have respect if she acted any other way. Meanwhile we see it time and time again.

[@haroldpierson5271]

The Mrs Florick character sure doesn't act masculine. Say what we want, It's all about choices. We choose to alter our response, We choose to alter the circumstances. Period.

[@willstar8095]

You guys took out 50k iraqi kids under the age of 5. Just in the last Iraq war. Yes, 50,000. Under 5yo And thats the number youve agreed to. Unicef and other groups say thats a hella low ball. But lets call it 50k. Is that what you thank your people for? "Thank you for your service" How tf did that serve you?? You guys are weird man.

[@King_of_69s]

I can't find the 50k kids you refer to can you put in a source? Most of the deaths I can find it was due to sanctions placed or displacement of civilians though. You also have to understand they still went out and fought a war for the country's interest. Also threat of death or imprisonment if failure to comply with a lawful order in a combat zone.

[@lolc23x]

why is she mad at the last statement? the reality of the severity of stupidity? cant accept common sense? or is it not so common in the past few years 😂😂

[@zero-ui1ew]

The absolute entitlement to convert the word civilian to afgan as if only american lives matfer

[@zeeone4492]

Hollywood's glamorization of war crimes

[@MattHare714]

I say.. keep my family safe, I don’t care how you do it.

[@salehac7]

How does invading Afghanistan and murdering Afghan families help protect your family though? Same question for unaliving thousands of Iraqi children. Make it make sense.