We really do need your support, so please download Dragon Champions from patron.me/kingsandgeneralsDC and get 500 dracoins, 250.000 gold, 500 energy, 100 autobattle tickets or 10 shards of Korkrim!
@vertabun4274 жыл бұрын
When you blow through that Raid: Shadow Legends cash too quickly
@jithinjohn30224 жыл бұрын
Please make one on India-Pakistan 1965 war.
@brokenbridge63164 жыл бұрын
Nice job with this video. I would love to see more video not just on battles that happening in India but all the wars fought by the British to take various colonies in India, Africa and elsewhere. Can' you make video's on that? Please?
@ravindrasathyajith20124 жыл бұрын
Sri Lanka(Ceylon) was not under the control of The Dutch. The Kandyan Kingdom controlled the majority of the country .. Only major seaports and forts was under Dutch rule
@abhisheknanda99564 жыл бұрын
Thanks guys can you make a series about it and include anglo-maratha, anglo-maratha, anglo-sikh,paika rebellion and Indian rebellion wars?
@kalakhatta86524 жыл бұрын
And from this battle, the metaphor "Mir Jafar" came to be in the Hindi language. Calling someone "Mir Jafar" means to call him a traitor.
@miu65304 жыл бұрын
It's the same in bengali
@Hi5Ripon4 жыл бұрын
We Bengalis coined him the same. After all its him we sold Bengal
@saad.awan..4 жыл бұрын
i think its common in Pakistan, india and Bangladesh, mir jaffar has become symbol of treachery
@nickgallucci81174 жыл бұрын
your foolish to blame him ...what you fail to realize is anybody can be bought ....the British gave him an offer he couldn't refuse and you would have done the same if the offer was given to you ...... Money Talks .... and it still does the talking to this very day .
@kalakhatta86524 жыл бұрын
@@nickgallucci8117 nobody is blaming anyone.,.I just stated a fact
@jbcheema98834 жыл бұрын
"Mir Jaffar" is synonymous with any traitor in sub continent.
@Liquidsback4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like that could be the name of a Disney Villain.....
@sabirahmed84154 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I wanted to say
@karandullet3804 жыл бұрын
Liquidsback you guessed it right he was a villain if didn’t betrayed the sub continent wouldn’t be under British control
@sakshampandey73424 жыл бұрын
Also Jaichand and Man Singh
@farhanahmed25084 жыл бұрын
The Jagat Seths too!
@alialzuheiry82204 жыл бұрын
Mir Jafar....the lying treacherous uncle some people have but do not need.
@Hi5Ripon4 жыл бұрын
We Bengalis curse him for betraying his own Bengal
@Omegaeon14 жыл бұрын
Thank God i have awesome uncles...
@cs-mi8ur4 жыл бұрын
@@Hi5Ripon *bengali Muslims
@Hi5Ripon4 жыл бұрын
@@cs-mi8ur Of course I agree our forefathers made a greatly wrong decision to join Pakistanis in the name of religion, only to get shoot on their heads at the end
@Hi5Ripon4 жыл бұрын
@youcometome9 I do agree that our Bengalis made a terrible attempt to join goddamn racist Pakistan
@igorhezer-gerbely71004 жыл бұрын
90% of the comments: Commenting about Mir Jafar meaning traitor as a slang in subcontinent.
@jupe20014 жыл бұрын
I doubt the majority even knows who Mir Jafar is, let alone being slang for a traitor.
@minhajulkarim14034 жыл бұрын
@@jupe2001 Everyone knows who Mir Jafar is (atleast in Bangladesh and West Bengal). If you think otherwise ask a Bengali.
@nktthegreat4 жыл бұрын
Many of them know about mir jafar. Islamic history and Colonial history of the subcontinent is shoved down everyone's ass here. Part of the reason why Indian intellectual elite have no idea about the pre- Delhi Sultanate history and have an existing Western Civilization based inferiority complex. At the beginning of the video, India is being described as one of the oldest civilization. That's about it as far as Indian historians' knowledge regarding the original civilization.
@Tpoleful4 жыл бұрын
@@jupe2001 In Bangladesh Mirjafori is a commonly used word for betrayal. I learned the word before I learned who he was and what he did.
@ndndsksnnd78894 жыл бұрын
where do pajeets poop now since they cant go out due to coronavirus and they dont have toilets at home
@saffatbokul38584 жыл бұрын
"Mir Jafar" is still used as a slang, which means a traitor.
@robleyusuf25664 жыл бұрын
Bengals had the means to protect their territory but it was the traitors who destroyed them and traitors themselves did not last.
@sadvenom78264 жыл бұрын
Like calling someone "judas".
@hushamnoor61124 жыл бұрын
Of course a tratior forever.
@lukezuzga64604 жыл бұрын
That's a great fact to learn, thanks. Kinda like the "300's" "Judas" name still meaning nightmare in Greek.
@sadvenom78264 жыл бұрын
Luke Zuzga Ephialtes
@Liquidsback4 жыл бұрын
Seems like rain always delivers victory to the British/English and defeat to the French.....
@theanglo-lithuanian17684 жыл бұрын
Our whole country is rain and thunder. Russia has cold winters, we have intense rains and storms. (E.g. Spanish armada of 1588). History is strange...
@Fenniks-4 жыл бұрын
A good example is the battle of Agincourt 1415
@TheNeerajgoyal4 жыл бұрын
Napoleon lost two hours due to constant raining near Waterloo.
@ThePalaeontologist4 жыл бұрын
Goddess Taranis watched over the British that day ;) tea and rain gods be blessed. Bring the weather with us.
@jackrees92524 жыл бұрын
God is English after all
@miniatureben35584 жыл бұрын
Siraj: *C'mon attack the British we outnumbered them* Jafar: *Sorry not right now I'm filming for Aladdin where I became the general who betrays the sultan*
@Tareltonlives4 жыл бұрын
Siraj: One thing I pride myself on Jafar, I'm an excellent judge of character.
@arijitmondal98144 жыл бұрын
😝😝😝👍
@miniatureben35584 жыл бұрын
@N R yes he is the grand vizier but he still acts as a general
@Tareltonlives4 жыл бұрын
@N R "That's SULTAN vile betrayer to you"
@tacrossover4 жыл бұрын
@Fahim Hussain very funny
@triptisingh14314 жыл бұрын
I love how the Indian subcontinent is united by their distaste for Mir Jafar
@ishanbajpai69403 жыл бұрын
@@jayakrishnan26 Actually he is known given that he is specifically mentioned in the history books as a traitor.
@ishanbajpai69403 жыл бұрын
@@jayakrishnan26 I mean we have a lot of other well known traitors too, like Jay singh.
@KiranSingh-zr8jr3 жыл бұрын
@@jayakrishnan26 Maybe you are not from Mainland India. From Northernmost or Southern region
@amarendrakumar3 жыл бұрын
@@KiranSingh-zr8jr Mainland india😂😂😂. Keep your bullshit to yourself. Southern or nort eastern, everything is india. There is no concept of mainland here. Go to Taiwan or hongkong and play this crap there.
@chao57653 жыл бұрын
@@amarendrakumar You might be from Mainland India,the place from where other traitors like Jaichand and gangu brahmin come from.
@abdm13114 жыл бұрын
From this day in Bengal no parents named their son as name Mirjafar , mirzafar now a synonym of betrayal and it's continuing till now .
@salehinkibria83774 жыл бұрын
watching this is utterly gut wrenching as a bangladeshi. we grew up hearing stories of mir jafar's treachery. but seeing it animated just makes it all the more real. the humiliation of plassey and the subsequent colonization haunts us to this day. the haunting reality we face is that we have no one to blame but ourselves for the events that transpired at plassey. we can only hope to learn from our history. otherwise we are doomed to repeat it.
@trollhippo83654 жыл бұрын
West Bengal +Bangladesh combined was the richest country in the world before British looted it .
@sealofapoorval74374 жыл бұрын
I know man. I feel you. Best we can do is learn from the Past and grow and move forward
@dickdrapper54914 жыл бұрын
@@trollhippo8365 How did the British "loot" it? From what I have read they just replaced one set of rulers with another.
@sekharapramod78194 жыл бұрын
@@dickdrapper5491 After Mir Jafar was deposed, Bengal was all but annexed by the East India company and all her wealth was looted and taken back to Britain. The farmers were forced to grow commercial crops over wheat and rice, and none of the taxes the Bengalis payed were used for the benifit of Bengal.
@dickdrapper54914 жыл бұрын
@@sekharapramod7819 You have sources that show the Indian economy changing from a Hindu ruler to the British? The British mandated crop choices?
@LeoWarrior144 жыл бұрын
Little known fact, Mir Jafar's treachery was possible in due part to his pet, a talking parrot.
@ajithsidhu71834 жыл бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals pls do one o 1st anglo sikh war pls
@gj12345678999994 жыл бұрын
Kings and Generals ha I get it. He made a joke from the Disney movie Aladdin. Jafar was the name of the villain and he had a talking parrot. 😆
@ajithsidhu71834 жыл бұрын
@@gj1234567899999 jaffar😂
@sagarsaxena63184 жыл бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals you got played.
@Tareltonlives4 жыл бұрын
"With all due respect, Your Rottenness, couldn't we just wait for a real storm?"
@94.darshanugalepatil514 жыл бұрын
Whether it was Mir Jaffer or Maratha Mysore Struggle ..... Indians have defeated India !
@diwakarjha89014 жыл бұрын
Mir jafar wasn't Indian he was Muslim.
@vip1298704 жыл бұрын
Mir Gaffer was an Afghani warlord, he did not see himself as Indian. Yes he had Hindu generals but he wanted to impose Islam on everyone so it is good that he lost. Otherwise, India would look worse than Syria today.
@NortheastIndiaindetails4 жыл бұрын
@@diwakarjha8901 what
@NortheastIndiaindetails4 жыл бұрын
@Baby Sama 48 indian is not a race or ethnicity
@mrblackmamba1173 жыл бұрын
@@diwakarjha8901 being indian isnt a religion.. its ethnicity.
@arkadeepkundu47294 жыл бұрын
Brits approaching Calcutta by ship: Sir, there's a fort in the way One drunk sailor: *Hic* Hold my rum! *Hic*
@jimtim88054 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha..love the comment!! Although the Battle of Plassey really saddens me but that part of drunken soldiers was really weird, stupid and hillarious.
@ayon86423 жыл бұрын
Fort William
@anantambisht48953 жыл бұрын
Its false
@poncedeleon29644 жыл бұрын
Battle of Plassey is a very sad event for my country Bangladesh. We remember the day every year as we lost independence for 214 year (1757-1971) because of that war. That may be one day war but the impact is so high that all South Asian countries(Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Nepal, Bhutan and a little bit Afghanistan) fall into British hand for 200 year. Siraj-ud-Daula was very young when he sit on throne. He was just 23 year. Just think what a 23 year old understand about politics. His close minister betray him who should be support him. The Fun fact is 100 year later The Great Indian mutiny(The deadliest war in British Indian history) start the same day from Bengal
@lordgawain4 жыл бұрын
100 not 200 for the area such as punjab haryana and present pakistan area and jammu kashmir
@poncedeleon29644 жыл бұрын
@@lordgawain Yes you are right. Sikh kingdom fall into British hand after second Anglo-Sikh war in 30 march 1849. British did not take subcontinent in one day of course. It take almost 100 year to conquer subcontinent. Also many native state was not directly control by British. British give them protection and control their foreign affair
@lordgawain4 жыл бұрын
Yes its not taken over in one day but the britishers had already reached the sutlej river by early 1800s thats why Treaty Of Amritsar (1809) was signed
@aybakaltamish81034 жыл бұрын
21 year old Mehmed Al fatih conquerd Constantinople and ended the Byzantne empire. 16 year old Muhammad ibn Qasim conquered Sindh and Multan and brought Islam to eastern Asia. Age really doesn't matter if you are smart enough, and have Allah's blessings. Nawab Siraj was just unlucky that traitor scum mir zafar was his commander in chief.
@Saiful224 жыл бұрын
@@andyc9902 Firstly Mohan Lal is nor Bengali. Yes Mohan Lal was brave and honest man. He done what a honest person should do. It's not right to judge a person by only his religion. There are traitors and dishonest person in everywhere. But you know what's more Ironic? Except Mohanlal, Almost all Hindus support British rule in Bengal. Many Radical Hindus still support British victory. But I hope everyone should improve them self and be a good man rather than hate other people just because of their religion, race or color
@DamnedHistory4 жыл бұрын
After watching this, I now realize that the antagonist from Disney's Aladdin was named Jafar! Woah!!
@fishnujish15113 жыл бұрын
Sultan betrayers together strong Jafar: 🐒🐒🐒
@farhanahmed25084 жыл бұрын
İ was just reading William Dalrymple's 'The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, And The Pillage Of An Empire'! So awesome to have this video from you, Kings and Generals! 💖
@farhanahmed25084 жыл бұрын
@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND 'An Empire' here refers to the Mughal Empire. Read it, it's a really good book. The Company subjugated each and every fragment of the Mughal Empire: from Hyderabad to Carnatic, from Bengal to Awadh and Punjab. İt dominated the whole Indian subcontinent.
@farhanahmed25084 жыл бұрын
@UCeUNO1zhSdg4p5pAHl8DOCw The pillaging of the Sassanid Empire was much worse: because it involved the expulsion of the native populations, in later periods. But then again, the dynasties that set themselves up in Persia were far from the colonialism that the European Empires of the eighteenth century practiced. The succession of dynasties in Persia made it a bastion of culture and stabilised, if not boosted, the region's economic influence. The East India, on the other hand, for example, in India, sucked every last gold bullion from Bengal. The British very well knew that it was the Company's evils in India and loot and pillage that enabled the British to carry on their country's administration despite the government sinking in debts in the financial crises of 1773.
@farhanahmed25084 жыл бұрын
@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND (Just on a side-note, you really shouldn't sympathise with any form of colonialism. İt looks really bad and brings into question whether you're biased towards a particular people or not.)
@AnindyaMitraDigitalStoryteller4 жыл бұрын
@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND Farhan wasn't spouting anti-white propaganda. Ilhan Omar and her squad seems to have taken up that gauntlet. Btw don't comment without background info it makes you sound stupid
@neutralfellow97364 жыл бұрын
@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND But the company was not an empire, it was literally a corporation.
@maxkennedy80754 жыл бұрын
*When the mango trees start singing the Grenadier’s march*
@intahermahim90844 жыл бұрын
are u british
@maxkennedy80754 жыл бұрын
dark satan ye
@ls2000764 жыл бұрын
@@maxkennedy8075 When the when the waters of Medway start speaking Dutch.
@ndndsksnnd78894 жыл бұрын
the pajeets today still worship their british overlords
@AbrahamLincoln44 жыл бұрын
"Tow row row row row for the British grenaidiers"
@abcdef276694 жыл бұрын
Benedict Arnold about Mir Jafar: "I already like this guy!"
@Themain1ofall4 жыл бұрын
Just like Alexander Arnold - Liverpool
@christophermercaldi86163 жыл бұрын
Brutus: "Observe"
@indoroyale78483 жыл бұрын
Ouch 😢
@kapildeshpande87314 жыл бұрын
The amount of detailed research done for making the video is greatly appreciated.
@sealofapoorval74374 жыл бұрын
This is so frustrating to watch as an Indian. There were so many avenues were we could have turned things around and kept our sovereignty and watching this even animated breaks my heart. Thanks to Kings and Generals channel for making this video very detailed and accurate providing a good insight into what happened. Love the channel. If only I could go back in time...
@Error1113 жыл бұрын
Mughals were turks
@Persev4443 жыл бұрын
The seal icon has my "approval". The peoples in this region of world have been made to fight neighbor vs neighbor to the enrichment of others like Clive. Clive looted 200,000 lbs sterling and his East India co. extracted ~45 trillion pounds from your homeland. Billions of people were impoverished and millions of lives lost over 2 centuries lost to greed and warmongering against your own brothers. The people that capitalized on India divisions in the past have returned ( legacy heir). They offer similar cassus belli ( border lines, resources,jealousy, religion, form of gov. I.e. the usual reasons) to go to war again. No need to go back in time. The nawabs this time are not local governors but nations with surging economies. History is playing out again now. This time instead of subjugation and frustration the outcome will be extinction in the form of mushroom clouds. What can be done to resist the cycle of war on the behest of the overseer?
@maltesimusfraterdemassimo72152 жыл бұрын
@@Persev444 clive got about 240.000 pounds and a jagir of roughly 23.000 per annum. the 240.000 pounds are worth about 28-40 million pounds today.
@davidthompson4383 Жыл бұрын
It's alright, the British made India great in the end.
@dizzyb111 Жыл бұрын
@@Error111 1. They were Turkic but not Turks. 2. At that point they had been in the country for hundreds of years, married local women and ruled a very diverse population. They became Indian just as the Aryans have thousands of years ago.
@sharadowasdr4 жыл бұрын
Clive razed Chandernagore to the ground. That used to be the most prosperous European town there. Clive destroyed nearly all of the 2500 French and Bengali buildings. Only three structures still stand from that period.
@AlcaturMaethor4 жыл бұрын
Huh, how? I mean he didn't have that many men, it seems e a daunting task for his force to destroy 2500 buildings in a reasonable amount of time.
@adityaraman89014 жыл бұрын
@david edbrooke-coffin Tell that to Arabs invading your land
@muhammadeisa14592 жыл бұрын
@@AlcaturMaethor if there are records of him doing that, then we can only speculate as to how.
@marajevomanash2 жыл бұрын
How easy is it to destroy something!
@EvanLax954 жыл бұрын
“Armed with matchlock rifles” is a misnomer. Matchlock muskets are smoothbore and lack rifling in the barrel, and thus are just “guns”.
@mcRydes4 жыл бұрын
probably the case, but theoretically there's no reason you can't rifle a matchlock. In fact such weapons really did exist, although I have no idea if they were used at this battle or not.
@midshipman86544 жыл бұрын
Michael Rhodes you are correct, though they may have been using just muskets, not rifled muskets in this engagement. However, the models kind of look like Jezails, and private individuals sometimes had rifled muskets around the world. (Not as much government made till later.) Think Kentucky long rifles, German Jagers and the aforementioned Jezails.
@sakshampandey73424 жыл бұрын
@@mcRydes Indian matchlocks were heavier and used larger bullets, much like the Jezail of the Afghans. This allowed for more range, stability and more damage. Using the rests attached to the guns, a soldier could further stabilise his gun, improving aim and effectiveness.
@jameswills63204 жыл бұрын
Muskets not guns
@neutralfellow97364 жыл бұрын
Erm, matchlock means just the firing mechanism, you can absolutely have a matchlock rifle. In fact, rifling was invented by Euros already in the late 15th century, when only matchlock ignition existed.
@avidiptodey64984 жыл бұрын
Please consider making this a series. Would like to have more videos on early modern indian history.
@avidiptodey64984 жыл бұрын
@@ndndsksnnd7889 The Englishmen made sure they didn't develop india . They were only interested in draining the wealth and natural resources of india. And also india has come a long way since then. How about knowing stuff before you make stereotypical comments and sound dumb? 99% of indian households now have access to toilets and basic sanitation. Grow up dude. Get you head out of your ass so at least you can poop. India already has places to poop.
@chayanlaskar88564 жыл бұрын
@@ndndsksnnd7889 which country are you from first tell me.... If you are from England then let me tell you we have 20times more toilets here in India than your country
@chayanlaskar88564 жыл бұрын
@@ot23234 now India has 99.99% toilet coverage
@chayanlaskar88564 жыл бұрын
@@ot23234 and looks like you guy's are very much concerned about India! Then try to help if there are some problems...stop taunting Get a life
@gobimurugesan24114 жыл бұрын
Only good thing happened to India by British is allowing education for lower castes
@akarshsp65123 жыл бұрын
Dear Kings and Generals team, It's nice to see that your team is are covering history of major battles or Dynasties of India, mentioned below are few of the interesting content you can create 1. Anglo Mysore wars 2. Gupta Empire 3. Vijayanagara empire 4. Maurya empire 5. Hoysala empire Looking forward for these interesting content. Thank you & Good Luck!!
@abcdef276694 жыл бұрын
Marathas raids in east be like: "But wait! There is more!"
@Raut-warrior4 жыл бұрын
@Akar Acharya what has karwa chauth got to do with this
@sealofapoorval74374 жыл бұрын
@Akar Acharya I'm pretty sure they don't celebrate it in South India too. What's it got to do with anything?
@Raut-warrior4 жыл бұрын
@Akar Acharya TN was not attacked but parts of it like Thanjavur and the Jingee Fort were captured and ruled by the Marathas
@BIGMrighthere3 жыл бұрын
Those raids devasted the Bengal Subah. Nothing but mass rape and genocide.
@мувн-ш4ы3 жыл бұрын
@AJ no
@FaozulAzim4 жыл бұрын
After the execution of Nawab Siraj, his wife Lutfunnesa was imprisoned here in Bangladesh (my country) by the British fearing that she (or any of Siraj's family) could rebel against the British.... Siraj's descendants still live here in Bangladesh and their financial situation is not very good...
@farhanhyder73044 жыл бұрын
That's sad
@umaransari97654 жыл бұрын
Rafi la Rider do they hold any title? Here in Lucknow we still have Nawab of Awadh but they are like businessmen and hold no power
@SHUBHAMSG4 жыл бұрын
There was no Bangladesh at that point of time
@FaozulAzim4 жыл бұрын
@@farhanhyder7304 yes it is
@FaozulAzim4 жыл бұрын
@@umaransari9765 they are now common people, and very few people know about them, their past history regarding Siraj Ad Dawlah
@chinmaykanade4 жыл бұрын
Hume to apno ne loota,gairo me kahaan dum tha!Meri kashti bhi doobi wahaan jahaan paani kam tha! I was looted by my own people,the outsiders never had that power! My ship survived the deep water,but ironically sank where the water was shallow!
@lukezuzga64604 жыл бұрын
So good to still have videos from Kings and Generals coming during these trying times! Thanks Guys, keep making em and we'll keep watching!
@ArunSKasrk4 жыл бұрын
Those who want a video on chola empire like here.
@chronikhiles4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that'd be incredible.
@gobimurugesan24114 жыл бұрын
Especially raids of South east Asia. Many people don't believe Indians had powerful navy during 11th century.
@ArunSKasrk4 жыл бұрын
@@gobimurugesan2411 There were powerful navies in the erstwhile kingdoms of the present day parts of India. For example navy of chola, navy of the zamorin etc.
@Neil63934 жыл бұрын
Yea I would love to know more about south indian empires...I am from delhi and the only thing we learned in school were mongols or british empire. I get why we need to learn about mongols and british and they were very significant in our history but that doesnt mean the rest of history should be neglected.
@rizwantalukder56594 жыл бұрын
Nobidy
@mdmahbubulalam21704 жыл бұрын
Here in Bangladesh and all of indian sub continent Mir jafar(cursed be his soul) is the synonym of traitor while young nawab siraj is still a hero.
@Tareltonlives4 жыл бұрын
"I'm off to fight in the French and Indian War" "Cool. Which one?"
@jurtra90904 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@babyyoda99543 жыл бұрын
This comment deserves more attention
@ericthompson34023 жыл бұрын
Right?
@godzilla981ify4 жыл бұрын
I love the India videos, there's always elephants and this time armoured elephants owo
@umaransari97654 жыл бұрын
@Александр nope they arent always useless, but since they advent of Gunpowder weapons and Artillery they are very dangerous to use
@bluemountain41814 жыл бұрын
@Александр If they were so useless why did people keep using them?
@riseALK4 жыл бұрын
@@bluemountain4181 Prestige, availabilty, show-off. Joking aside, they were used as draught animals mainly to pull cannons, even by Europeans in WWI. Trains and motor vehicles is what made them finally useless on the battlefield.
@milindgaikwad34984 жыл бұрын
Elephants were the tanks before gunpowder arrived on the battlefield. When properly trained, manned by the right men and armored at sensitive areas they were killing machines with huge swards on each tusk. After gunpowder however, with thunder of a big gun they became a liability.
@akashsasidharan97474 жыл бұрын
@@milindgaikwad3498 exactly , even Seleucius used them to great effect , he was gifted 500 elephants by Chandragupta maurya who was his son in law. Seleucids were the successors of Alexander in Persia.
@FaozulAzim4 жыл бұрын
After the death of Siraj, Mir Kashim, the Son in Law of Mir Jafar, attempted to fight off british in Buxer war (not chinese one) and he failed. And that was actually the very last nail to the coffin.
@rrt_xoxo56324 жыл бұрын
And the British took over India slowly and rest is history.
@FaozulAzim4 жыл бұрын
@@rrt_xoxo5632 yes, it make me very sad
@rrt_xoxo56324 жыл бұрын
@@FaozulAzim As a Bangladeshi, indeed a treacherous history.
@mohammedhassanakbari67224 жыл бұрын
@@rrt_xoxo5632 Baqri az Karnatak Gharawi az Banaras Nang-e-Dein Nang-e-Mazhab Nang-e-Maslak Nang-e-Qaum Nang-e-Millat Nang-e-Dunya Nang-e-Akhirat
@Aester4 жыл бұрын
The death of Mir Kashim is a grim one too. At his death bed the guy was so poor that his only property ( 2 shawls left) had to be sold just to afford his funeral
@kellenkinzel63764 жыл бұрын
I have personally always been curious about how the British were able to create such a stronghold in India, now I know. I knew that the British were in India for a very long time, I just didn't know how it all started. Simply incredible how strategic the British were at capturing land and keeping it for such long periods of time. Robert Clive simply out-mastered his opponents, which included the Bengali forces, the French forces, and the Dutch forces. Remarkable skill for sure.
@daemonzap14813 жыл бұрын
Mostly from this video it was Indians that ended up defeating themselves and handing themselves to the British. If they acted properly they would've easily won. I mean c'mon a force of 60,000 versus like 5,000?
@zeeafraud78983 жыл бұрын
Although we can validly remark at the victories and strategy of colonists, the implications of these victories on the people who were colonised must also be understood. Clive was a great commander, but away from the battlefield was an unpleasant man to say the least. For me that's what makes colonial history interesting; Plassey was a remarkable victory from Clive but also arguably the darkest day in Bengali history.
@MyPunksta3 жыл бұрын
The English spent over a 100 years understanding the politics of the sub continent and only put in their foot forward when the subcontinent was in a state of flux. They didn't have superior military technology (infact they reverse engineered Indian rockets and used them in America) but used deception and diplomacy to win.
@jbstarkiller46266 күн бұрын
@@MyPunkstaSounds like your coping🤣
@jbstarkiller46266 күн бұрын
@@daemonzap1481numbers don’t always win battles🤦🏻♂️ the Europeans defeated vastly larger forces then themselves all the time.
@rohandanielisaac81074 жыл бұрын
Do more of these Kings and Generals! Indian battles have so much intrigue and tension!!
@brokenbridge63164 жыл бұрын
I've always heard of this battle. But I have no idea of the details behind it. Wow the British sure got lucky. I wonder what if this battle had gone differently. The history of India would have been quite different. My compliments to those who made this video a reality.
@Naeem72224 жыл бұрын
These white people would have stormed the subcontinent for jobs
@nkl73454 жыл бұрын
Probably even more street-defecation
@ShahanshahShahin4 жыл бұрын
@@nkl7345 lol British made India like that
@gk45784 жыл бұрын
@@ShahanshahShahin lol yeah British still force Indians to shit in their streets
@HaggisOfDeath4 жыл бұрын
@@indiafirst3676 The only 'glorious' areas of India are those that had their infrastructure built by the British. We might all find Imperialism distasteful these days, but the rampant lies spread about Colonial powers irritate me to no end. As with most things it was not all bad, nor was it all good. The intelligent person would take what was good and leave what was bad (and that actually might be why Britain prospered so much in those days, there are countless examples of the British simply 'stealing' good ideas from other cultures; from military doctrine and Martello towers to a tea based beverage and the humble curry, they took the good achievements of others and combined them to make themselves GREAT ... Britain).
@Boatswain_Tam4 жыл бұрын
Yes! More 18th century warfare please! So many interesting battle to cover.
@Sharma-o2n6 ай бұрын
*Read the battle of assaye* it was harder than the battle of waterlloo
@maxschaeffner90054 жыл бұрын
Great video! As an American i hate how we never learn about these British pre revolutionary war conflicts, because they add so much info about Britains geopolitical situation and how the colonies fit into it
@ramz_teccyz20552 жыл бұрын
This was more to do with a private company in Britain the EIC rather than the established military britain had led by the monarchy.
@Anglo_Saxon1 Жыл бұрын
@@ramz_teccyz2055 But it did all get so colossal that the Crown had to eventually assume control as far as I'm aware.
@Anglo_Saxon1 Жыл бұрын
The situation in the American colonies was much different to Asia because we classed the colonies as literally an extension of England/Britain.
@chezburger1781 Жыл бұрын
@@Anglo_Saxon1 yes victoria became empress of india and the company was disbanded, i remember it being due to the power the company had
@Anglo_Saxon1 Жыл бұрын
@@chezburger1781Yes,EIC Having a private army etc.
@ayeshajaved60984 жыл бұрын
Thank you kings and generals I am a huge fan of yours. This battle is discussed in my 7 grade history book. Love from Pakistan
@muhammadmunim45304 жыл бұрын
@Brock Lesnar yes we knew about maratha empire ,we also knew at that time there were also nawabs of hyderbad, nawab of bengal,nawab of audh etc, tipu sultan of mysore ,sikh empire , durrani empire and a small area under mughals
@UniquePicsels3 жыл бұрын
@@swapanzameen6302 and how they captured land till peshawar
@nktthegreat4 жыл бұрын
And hence came the term "Mir Jafar" in the subcontinent implying a traitor. Troubling times laid ahead for India. Troubling times indeed.
@mohammedhassanakbari67224 жыл бұрын
Baqri az Karnatak Gharawi az Banaras Nang-e-Dein Nang-e-Mazhab Nang-e-Maslak Nang-e-Qaum Nang-e-Millat Nang-e-Dunya Nang-e-Akhirat
@anantambisht48953 жыл бұрын
@@mohammedhassanakbari6722 kya back raha hai mulle.
@Torus21124 жыл бұрын
I get the feeling Clive would've been right at home commanding a Roman legion.
@Pitbull000004 жыл бұрын
@ASCALON He didnt
@lukehaddad51854 жыл бұрын
@@swapanzameen6302 he committed suicide? Why and how?
@tylerdurden37224 жыл бұрын
@@swapanzameen6302 ...like on a suicide mission? Seems legit
@iuliusconstantcornelio20184 жыл бұрын
@@lukehaddad5185 He felt grief for all the atrosicities he committed in India, so he killed himself.
@mayur43054 жыл бұрын
@@iuliusconstantcornelio2018 he committed suicide because he was found guilty of corruption with private trades so he yeeted himself out before govt hanged him
@JohnnyElRed4 жыл бұрын
"... that saw Britain and France, the two largest colonial powers..." Portugal: "Excuse me?!" Spain: "I beg your pardon?"
@Liquidsback4 жыл бұрын
Talking about the new powers.
@Tareltonlives4 жыл бұрын
"Go back to bed, old man!"
@RodolfoGaming4 жыл бұрын
The thing i rate here is the absence of a 'am i a joke to you'
@liamlecarpentier29734 жыл бұрын
JohnnyElRed Spanish and Portugal was declining by this time and GB and France were the new super powers
@anjusanal4 жыл бұрын
@@DCDVassili no
@1337codaddict4 жыл бұрын
Man I swear this channel reads my mind. Whenever I’m looking battles up this channel has always *just* released a relevant video
@dukelord90054 жыл бұрын
Only Maratha could defeat the Britishers in a full fledged war. Maratha and Mysore forces under a Persian managed to defeat British in battles.on the other hand the Overwhelming majority of British victories in India depended on strong participation of its local Indian allies. A unified India under Maratha or the Mughals would have made the subjugation of India a very very difficult prospect.
@ThePalaeontologist4 жыл бұрын
There is a difference between fighting thousands of miles away from home and on your home field with all the advantages the home field gives. The British and other Europeans e.g. French were fighting at very long range relying on _ridiculously_ long communication lines back to Europe. The British were relying on a few generals and admirals to keep control of the situation. 18th century strategy for European Empires was difficult, more difficult than it might first appear. The news relaying back to their home capitals was very slow; for example, it was a month or longer round trip for news to get back and to from New York to London in the 1770's. It was the age of sail, and you were only as fast as 18th century naval architecture and wind power allow you to be (and that is before considering losses to storms, uncharted rocks, pirates, tornadoes, typhoons, uncharted reefs, disease outbreaks and navigational problems) They were doing very well to even seen a small fraction of their true military power. If the entire British Army arrived in Maratha and Mysore territory, game over. Sorry but what you said is deluded and wrong. The British only had to ''rely'' on local native forces because they could not send their full strength to one place. They were scattered all over the world. It is a problem they had in the American War of Independence. If it were just the rebels they were fighting in the world, it wouldn't be a question of victory or defeat. They'd just obliterate Washington easily (and to be fair they had kicked his backside thoroughly for years and had him on the run from New York, chasing him all over the place, nearly catching up with him like ten times; kept giving them the slip though, living to fight another day, which is all he needed to do really) The British had to keep massive forces elsewhere, and also at least *half the British Army* in England, in case France and Spain invaded (which yes, they were planning; see Treaty of Aranjuez 1779) Britain often had to keep large forces at home just in case their rivals in Europe tried any shit while their main armies were away. Ironically, they learnt that lesson *the other way round* e.g. they once sent almost their entire army to what is now West Germany, fighting the French. It was a large conflict, which Britain was just one of many allies in. The problem was, when Britain's main armies were away, Scottish Jacobite rebels attacked England and got as far as Derby in the Midlands of England, before turning back. For a while, it looked like London itself might fall to the Jacobite clan warriors, and some rich people in London panicked thinking the city was lost. Stories of thousands of Scottish warriors burning through England, reached London (that didn't really happen, mostly the Jacobites just got drunk half way down the country, argued about what their strategy was then went home whereas Bonnie Prince Charlie - whom was more Italian than he was anything to do with Scotland, particularly not Highland Scottish lol - then had to go back to Scotland with his army) He wanted to take the throne back for his dethroned familial line. He was a prince in exile, wanting to use the Jacobites to get the throne. He failed. Anyway, the British government realised it didn't have enough regular soldiers to defend London, and so it sent spies out to infiltrate the Jacobite camps, and learn information as well as to spread misinformation. Soon, the Jacobite rebels thought it was true that 10,000 redcoats were waiting for them outside the gates of London. That was a force which would have likely destroyed their 7,000-8,000 strong host, if it caught them on a field of it's choosing; so the clan chiefs convened and then decided to go home, with what loot they already had. Problem was, it wasn't true lol The British *were* bringing back multiple regiments from Germany, and this would eventually be like 20,000-25,000 soldiers coming home as soon as possible (which would have absolutely annihilated the Jacobites anyway) The main worry was that the Jacobites would have burnt down the capital and humiliated the British government, so they raised as many militia troops as they could (about 5,000-6,000) and drew in every last soldier they had around in Southern England to defend the capital. Defences were improved etc. Ironically, they'd probably have enough armed yeomanry/militia and garrison soldiers to mount a pretty sturdy defence if the Jacobites came (but most likely, the fighting ferocity of the Highlanders in melee, would overrun the defences in a general overview of tactical situations) The government was rushing regiments back home, and with a furious vengeance and anger. However, it would take time to sail them back to Britain. It was a lesson that Britain took very seriously, always making sure it had strong garrisons that would be enough to crush rebellions or repel invaders, while other field armies fought around the world. It worked well for Britain (but obviously the catch, was that they had to keep large forces at home, training but otherwise being taken out of Britain's offensive capabilities, standing idle) It was not helpful when Britain urgently needed to send more men elsewhere. Britain later absolutely crushed the Jacobites at Culloden, though the victory was mostly won by Lowland Scots serving in the British Army. Most of the English regiments were still either in West Germany or were on the way home from there. The Duke of Cumberland (called, ''Butcher Cumberland'' to this day by some Scots, and certainly by many Highlanders back then) led over 8,000 government troops into the Highlands to crush the rebels. He did, and Culloden ended it. But not before the Highlanders spent weeks leading the government forces on a wild goose chase through the rainy glens and hills of the Highlands. They'd melt away, into the heather and hills, and avoid giving battle. When battle came, the Jacobites fought fiercely, though the new model bayonet drills, superior organisation, equipment and training of the British troops, made it a very one-sided British victory. The terrifying Highland Charge, did some damage but the British lines held bravely and they defeated the Highlanders. Cumberland's brutality against the Jacobite survivors remains very controversial (he basically just said bayonet anyone whom identifies themselves as Jacobites) His troops went over the battlefield, shooting and stabbing any Highlanders who declared their allegiances to their rebel cause. Then Cumberland went after their homesteads and destroyed many Highland residences, and banned kilts, tartans and bagpipes. Later British governments would allow the Scottish to celebrate those cultural heritages and Queen Victoria famously loved Scotland, promoting tartans, kilts and bagpipes and often staying at Balmoral Castle in Scotland, as part of a public relations exercise to improve Anglo-Scottish unity. The Victorians were keenly aware of how harsh Cumberland had been, and wanted to right some wrongs. In fairness, though, the Jacobites had *invaded England* so it's pretty obvious how the British government in the mid 18th century would react to that - with fire and blood. Anyway, there you go. Learn history properly before making such comments.The British were not at full force. If they were, the Marathas and Mysoreans would lose anyway. Making up for numerical shortages, they obviously turned to native Sepoys. So? Every European Empire did in India. They were all dealing with the same logistical nightmares and had to find ways to solve the problems they had with manpower. They were better trained, better-equipped and better armed then the Mughals, Marathas and Mysoreans. Britain had *four* wars with Mysore. Yes, Mysore did better earlier on but it didn't last forever. Britain destroyed the Mysorean Sultanate, dissolving it after the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War. Mysore couldn't even stop a fraction of Britain's true strength. Most of it's successes were against smaller British forces and during times when Britain was fighting on a global scale against 5 different major powers plus their smaller satellite allies e.g. in the Second Anglo-Mysore War, during the broader timeline of the events of the American War of Independence, there were 80,000 Mysorean warriors of the Sultan, basically joining thousands of French troops in attacking British outposts and forts. The British were busy in North America, the Caribbean, the North Sea, West Africa, Gibraltar, the Mediterranean, the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean, the Far East and in India. Everywhere the British and French met, they fought. Plus Britain was fighting Spain, the Dutch Republic and many others. Pirates constantly threatened British shipping in the Atlantic, Caribbean and Far East. So Britain had to devote a lot of naval power to that. Speaking of which, most British warships never even went anywhere near India. They were busy elsewhere. 2nd or 3rd line units like smaller 3rd rates, 4th rates, 5th rates, 6th rates, gun-brigs and sloops etc would be sent. The biggest and best ships in the Royal Navy were saved for elsewhere. It was up to the EIC to deal with most problems, until they were reprimanded and absorbed by the British government much later on.
@dukelord90054 жыл бұрын
@@ThePalaeontologist you took the trouble to type such a long reply mentioning lil bits of history which is known to almost all. I considered all that when I said about unified India being strong enough to fend off small to mid sized EIC forces . There's no way whole British army would have been transported to east indies for capturing trade ports, colonial factories or far away spice lands. One has to be the moron of the highest order to think that was logically possible.i never said Maratha or mysorean forces were better than regular English professional soldiers or they had better tactics or training. Britain arguably had the best trained army during the 17th to 19th century but that did not mean that they would be all deployed to India. So I standby on my comment that a unified India under a India imperial rule like the Marathas or Mughals would have better thwarted British encroachments. For a historical example one can see British conduct in India during the reign of Jahangir , Shahjahan or Aurangzeb. The British could mostly harm Mughal shipping lines through piracy. But on land mughal dominated.
@curious_one11564 жыл бұрын
Did a faction of the Marathas not turn against Mysore ? 1799 ?
@BS-cc4ks6 ай бұрын
To be honest, India being unified under the Maratha or Mughals seemed like a more unlikely and impossible concept than Britain unifying India. Their organizational problems were severe.
@ghuzh23984 жыл бұрын
Mir jafar now means traitor in Subcontinent. Talk about legacy.
@Liquidsback4 жыл бұрын
Basically the U.S. equivalent is Benedict Arnold.
@salmaaktar25473 жыл бұрын
And in Bangladesh, Siraj means Idiot.
@kaloyannikolchev54824 жыл бұрын
Love Kings and Generals . Been subscribed since y’all had 20 k subscribers
@KingsandGenerals4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for being with us
@featherlessbiped5934 жыл бұрын
Yes this channel is so big now. Now I am finally graduated and will get a job and then become a Patreon , that is my wish since last two years.
@rudman974 жыл бұрын
Wow! As a Indian Bengali, I feel proud that a piece of Bengal history is presented today....GREAT পলাশীর যুদ্ধ...... "বণিকের মানদণ্ড পোহালে শর্বরী দেখা দিল রাজদণ্ড রূপে"
@mohammedhassanakbari67224 жыл бұрын
Baqri az Karnatak Gharawi az Banaras Nang-e-Dein Nang-e-Mazhab Nang-e-Maslak Nang-e-Qaum Nang-e-Millat Nang-e-Dunya Nang-e-Akhirat
@queenelizabethii43314 жыл бұрын
I hate Indians, just like Churchill.
@bhabanishankarbehera69084 жыл бұрын
@@queenelizabethii4331 nobody cares
@queenelizabethii43314 жыл бұрын
@Aidda Stop pooping where you sleep.
@queenelizabethii43314 жыл бұрын
@Aidda That is why we conquered you.
@waverider16744 жыл бұрын
Need to appreciate the bold and daring moves of Robert Clive which secured the victory at overwhelming odds against larger armies
@cypher13084 жыл бұрын
I don't think Clive won because of his skills, he won because of treachery of Mir Jafar & the lightening, lucky dude !
@Fuad_3 жыл бұрын
@@cypher1308 Thats also a skill
@MyPunksta3 жыл бұрын
Yes lying and bribing is a skill not many have
@TheBucketSkill3 жыл бұрын
@@cypher1308 Either way his monumental win meant subjugation for CENTURIES. A crazy feat!
@waverider16742 жыл бұрын
@@MyPunksta In war no one is an angel. Remember even Krishna too lied and tricked the Kauravas into many missteps like naming an elephant as Ashwathamma, asking Bhim to kill it and shout that he had killed Ashwathama thereby making Drona come to grief and drop his bow, blah blah blah. You can be lucky once but not many times. Robert Clive is no angel but clearly he had sheer courage and balls. He began the ending of the Islamic rule in India inadvertently.
@Cancoillotteman4 жыл бұрын
So a man named "Jafar" actually was a traitor plotting against his sultan ? Who might have guessed ? XD
@salmaaktar25473 жыл бұрын
As a Bengali I would say, if you read history, you will understand that Siraj is one of the stupidest creatures on earth.
@harshkulshrestha94403 жыл бұрын
@@salmaaktar2547 true
@YAZ137863 жыл бұрын
@@salmaaktar2547 what is his stupidness🤔
@saadadantor8083 жыл бұрын
The Thing is Shiraj Was Helpless His Grand Vizier,His Own Aunt Ghoshati Begum conspired Against him! What could he do? And it was not a long time that he was on the throne! He had no idea that the 2 closest person of his would betray him!
@YAZ137863 жыл бұрын
@@saadadantor808 the invisible enemy is more dangerous than visible enemy . It is very hard to detect cheatings . u know that many rulers and great people like Tippu sultan , Bahadur shah , bagat singh , and many freedom fighters are caugt and executed by traiting .
@Hi5Ripon4 жыл бұрын
RIP Sirajudaulah as a last great independent ruler of Bengal 💔
@kangkanlahkar90454 жыл бұрын
Not at all there were Maratha, Mysore and Punjab who fought bravely
@kangkanlahkar90454 жыл бұрын
@md ziden FYI-Not my Maratha. There was not alliance between Maratha and Bengal. However in 2nd Anglo Mysore war, Maratha did allied with Mysore against British
@Hi5Ripon4 жыл бұрын
@Hernando Malinche Of course he might have been imperfect, but at least better than that demon called Mir Jafar
@intahermahim90844 жыл бұрын
@Hernando Malinche ur a idiot
@khurmiful4 жыл бұрын
Great? Tell me any Great ruler who couldn’t hang on to his army?
@Big_E_Soul_Fragment4 жыл бұрын
It's all fun and games until you hear "RULE BRITANNIA" playing over the horizon
@aquilatempestate95274 жыл бұрын
Yep, then you stop the games to sing-along.
@karandullet3804 жыл бұрын
The 225677th Fragment of the Man-Emperor of Mankind well and your ministers starts betraying you and starts rupturing your supply lines
@bhaskarbharali58534 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@jasjrock64244 жыл бұрын
the mugals were muslims that conquered the place originally you left that bit out
@karandullet3804 жыл бұрын
Aidda that gotta hit him hard
@shekontekon97994 жыл бұрын
02:52 "Honorable" East India Company?
@yllbardh4 жыл бұрын
good catch....lol nothing honourable about that....
@blacktemplar94994 жыл бұрын
That's the official name of the company, the Honourable east India company
@MrKirmajerelod4 жыл бұрын
one of the best in those times.
@HumaTheGreat4 жыл бұрын
Honorable? LOL
@Daneclaw4 жыл бұрын
@yllbardh The official name was the Honourable East India Company stoopid.
@poeticider4 жыл бұрын
Local to me is Powys Castle, Clive of India's estate. If you ever visit there you can find Clive's impressive collection of Indian (mostly Mughal) arms and armour. Thank you for bringing alive the history of an iconic local figure!
@fishnujish15114 жыл бұрын
263 years before I was born, a man went off to war to fight the East India Company. He left with his brother. The man saw the Black Hole of Calcutta, then the Battle of Plassey. At Plassey, he was hit by a British musket ball. Yet he fought and was killed in hand-to hand combat with bayonets. His brother was one of the Bengalis retreating under Mir Jafar. He escaped back home, founded a family with a Bengali woman in the quiet river village of Mathbaria. There they lived until the Bangladeshi Independence movement, My grandad had to move because he was Hindu. He moved away to Calcutta, the same place where his ancestor's Prince had locked up the British nearly 2 centuries ago. My dad grew up there, and he lived there till I was born. Now I live in Britain. This story means nothing to you, random viewer, but to me, it's the reason I walk the Earth today. And to me, if that one guy had decided to stay with his brother in battle, I would have not been born. So I thank him.
@Muigai-i5e3 жыл бұрын
whats up with indians loving white men after all they put you through
@bigmoose73 жыл бұрын
@@Muigai-i5e thats just racism we arent in 1783 anymore dumbass
@Mephisto434 жыл бұрын
Top ten Anime Betrayals. 😭
@OptimusDelta4 жыл бұрын
As Bengali we still use his name as a slang who threw our freedom at the feet of the british people.
@NoName-sz5lu4 жыл бұрын
@Hernando Malinche by freedom it means our wealth was contained in our land. Not directly transferred to London.
@NoName-sz5lu4 жыл бұрын
@Hernando Malinche I think you'll find the answer if you search about the industrial Revolution and from where the money and other materials came from mostly. And the famines after famines in Bengal for lack of wealth and crops as they were forced to cultivate specific crops needed for the British. We can go on and on but I don't want to. Just wanting to point out that it is much better to be ruled by a dictator of your country than of a far off land on so many levels.
@NoName-sz5lu4 жыл бұрын
@Hernando Malinche that's why the British spent a lot of time not sailing all over the world and fighting for lands. Because, they were not profitable.
@kamrulhasan34684 жыл бұрын
lol Siraj knew Jafar is a conspirator but as he was a big fat teddy bear he tried to hug their conflicts out and thought something would hit Jafar at the last moment and he will fight for Siraj
@ghanshyam19904 жыл бұрын
Beautiful narration and illustration. Thank you for covering the military history of the sub-continent. As per the combatants; Nawab Shiraj-ud-Daula is remembered as a young patriot who fought to maintain sovereignty and Independence but as you pointed out was trapped in a den of snakes. And as for the traitor Mir-Jaffar, he's widely remembered and synonymous with treason, conspiracy and fifth columnism.
@redrose-gd8fu4 жыл бұрын
Nawab was a looser
@ghanshyam19904 жыл бұрын
@@redrose-gd8fu - No doubt he lost, however, sometimes losing a battle can make one a hero also. It was a matter of principle.
@Khalistan9994 жыл бұрын
Should do a video on the Anglo-Sikh wars
@gursimarsingh55053 жыл бұрын
Yes! We would see how traitor, totally sold dogras led to defeat of sikh army, the army which had capability to capture delhi, and even Calcutta.
@mohammedHassan-nn9iv4 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on four Anglo-Mysore wars. Very interesting wars, one of which (1st Anglo-Mysore war) being the first and the only defeat by the British in Indian subcontinent. ( If you exclude 1st Anglo- Afghan war)
@kangkanlahkar90454 жыл бұрын
You should see the other side of coin. 1st Anglo Maratha war resulted in Maratha's victory. Ranjit Singh defended his kingdom.
@abhisheknanda99564 жыл бұрын
1st anglo-mysore, 2nd anglo-mysore, 1st anglo-maratha and 1st anglo-afghan war were the one where British were defeated.
@LKG6444 жыл бұрын
@@abhisheknanda9956 lol even chero a small kingdom have defeated British in Jharkhand
@jevinliu46584 жыл бұрын
I just realized that the Maratha tokens look like pacman figures going to eat everyone up. Somewhat accurate, I guess.
@ShahanshahShahin4 жыл бұрын
Actually the Flag of Maratha Empire was all Orange/Saffron (Sacred colour of Hinduism/Bhuddism) you can quick search on the browser "Maratha flag".
@cypher13084 жыл бұрын
@@ShahanshahShahin Hindus all over the India usually had same flags. That was the Flag of "Hindu Swaraj", Hindu Self Rule.
@brucewayne41284 жыл бұрын
@@ShahanshahShahin Wrong, Hinduism adopted Maratha flag not the other way around.
@ssm75933 жыл бұрын
@@brucewayne4128 correct 👍
@experimentsandunboxing98454 жыл бұрын
Please make video on Third battle of Panipat.
@themoneyman80114 жыл бұрын
This is one of your best! I love how you handle potentially controversial topics with humble neutrality. Please create more videos on Great Britain's imperial wars.
@farabi12174 жыл бұрын
For us bengalis that day 23june 1757 was the last day of our independent and also the most shameful and heroic day . We lost our freedom because of our own people's betrayal. But still our nawab fought till the end but he just got berated by his own family members specially his auntie ghoshate bagum.
@amitr4385 Жыл бұрын
Bangladesh came into existence in 1947..dnt cry
@AverageHandEnjoyer-jp3xu9 ай бұрын
@@amitr4385Bengal was independent during the period of Bengal sultanate and Nawab rule. 🤓
@amitr43859 ай бұрын
@@AverageHandEnjoyer-jp3xu I think u were rules by East India ..that should explain u what is independence....
@davidwoods74084 жыл бұрын
That was great. Something else I didn't know! Keep em coming!
@jayeshkukreti33304 жыл бұрын
One can still feel the presence of French in Pondicherry , such a magnificent city!
@heronofalexandria914 жыл бұрын
10:53 when that music plays you know it’s going down.
@gajiburrahman73784 жыл бұрын
8:45 Allivardi Khan was actually a very competent ruler of Bengal. He defeated six invasions by the Hindu marathas. But the constant invasions had such a terrible impact on the economy of Bengal, that eventually he concluded it would be easier just to pay tribute to the marathas instead of defeating another invasion.
@gajiburrahman73783 жыл бұрын
@@ayansengupta6592 He paid them tribute and gave them Orissa in order to stop them from continually attacking Bengal. Repelling all those maratha invasions had a bad impact on the population and economy of Bengal. Allivardi Khan decided it would be just better to pay them off and give them Orrisa. That way at least they would be left alone. It worked.
@flashldn1552 жыл бұрын
They should have slaughtered the Marathas
@vizviz72405 Жыл бұрын
@@gajiburrahman7378 hmmmm i understand economy is extremely important in same way Marathas lost to abdali in 1761
@EthGemsnStuff4 жыл бұрын
This comment might get some hate but i feel like it was Britain that united India u need a common enemy to get together! Love the channel!
@faizanraogaming4 жыл бұрын
haha, basstaards looted everything
@wondertraveller99284 жыл бұрын
Well mughals were our common enemy before the British. So technically we were United but not as a single nation.
@B0lld4 жыл бұрын
I think video should titled invasion rather then conquest.
@ridwanrahman60634 жыл бұрын
Britan created India as a modern state before that I don’t think there was a United Indian identity
@nihitshrivastava25024 жыл бұрын
But it did get divided into three(not counting Afganistan) so yes... But actually No.. it was the hardwork of a lot of leaders ( specially Sardar Patel) that the modern India shape the way it is.. even some states Join India after it's Independence like Sikkim and Goa. So I would say you are half Correct. Peace.
@rudman974 жыл бұрын
Sirajuddaula was caught on the night of that battle at a place near his capital Murshidaabad, called 'Bhogobangolar ghat', which is a ferry site on the Bhagirathi (Ganga) river. Folklore is that, he was escaping in disguise of simple dresses but guards caught him by seeing his royal shoe, which he forgot to change after fleeing the battle.
@aikalahamjie70794 жыл бұрын
Nice and informative...i skipped some crusade videos but this really caught my interest...cant wait for more...Love it
@hobo84204 жыл бұрын
mir jafar's betrayal of the nawab was eerily similar to the betrayal of Maharana Sanga by Silhadi, who defected with 35k troops to the moghuls. Wack
@hobo84203 жыл бұрын
@alauddin husain shah lmfao seethe
@MrJames84753 жыл бұрын
“He suspected the British of being part of a coup to overthrow him, though in fairness he was probably right about that” Historians: Do you have any idea how little that narrows it down?
@hamzasubhani97803 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The first Pakistani President Iskandar Mirza was grandson of Mir Jafar.
@anantambisht48953 жыл бұрын
That is why pakistan is a snake no doubt.
@hamzasubhani97803 жыл бұрын
@@anantambisht4895 In what sense?
@Mahfuz-kc7qe3 жыл бұрын
Stop spreading fake news stupid.. Mir Jafars descendents as still in kalkatta. Living in humiliation till date
@hamzasubhani97803 жыл бұрын
@@Mahfuz-kc7qe You can google it
@mayukhmitra58193 жыл бұрын
@@Mahfuz-kc7qe Yes but no. Mir Jafar had many wives. If Nawabate of Bengal was still there, then the person living in Calcutta (Abbas Ali Mirza) would have been the rightful heir. But, Iskander Ali Mirza was a Bengali (He was from East Pakistan) and descendant of Mir Jafar
@pierrerust24234 жыл бұрын
Very detailed and well-documented video once again ! Congratulations Kings and Generals ! Looking forward to watching the next episodes.
@chiranjitsaha31404 жыл бұрын
I live in Calcutta.....this is thing I was waiting eagerly....Battle of Plassey was really the most important turning point for british.........Thank u very much😄.....Please cover the whole Indian war history.
@anandraosindhe4 жыл бұрын
Chiranjit Saha if British would have not arrived all Bengali’s would have been Muslims by now. Already now 70% of Bengalis are Muslims including Bangladesh and West Bengal population
@mr.profundis38044 жыл бұрын
@@anandraosindhe and that's had nothing to do with arrival of British. Muslim population suppressed hindus in 1840s, due to higher population growth.
@22vx4 жыл бұрын
Thus began the Anglo-Indian tradition of enjoying a plate of sliced mango fruit after a military victory. Good stuff, K&G - Thanks! OK I may have made up the sliced mango thing.
@Tareltonlives4 жыл бұрын
It's the Company: it's all about the tea
@abhisheknanda99564 жыл бұрын
Next plz do anglo-maratha wars,anglo-mysore wars,anglo-sikh wars,anglo-nepal war,anglo-bhutan war,anglo-afghan wars,paika rebellion and Indian rebellion.
@captaintyrrell64284 жыл бұрын
*Indian Mutiny
@gobimurugesan24114 жыл бұрын
It will be like countries in a new continent fighting each other. Wait it's subcontinent... 😁
@rechalnorbu47404 жыл бұрын
What about Anglo sikkim war
@pradeepchoudhary16274 жыл бұрын
@@captaintyrrell6428 Indian war of independence* speak the right term you brit.
@Isnapthesky3 жыл бұрын
That's the thing about betrayal, it never comes from your enemy but from the one you trust the most.
@akibislam56562 жыл бұрын
Muslim mir madan and hindu mohanlal That was a heart touching line. Imagine the brotherhood in 1757 compared to that of now in India
@kshatriyapa Жыл бұрын
It wasn't brotherhood. It was just a temporary political alliance.
@mayanksinghsikarwar72 Жыл бұрын
@@kshatriyapa loyalty doesn't know any religion, my friend.
@123kanad4 жыл бұрын
The Clive House in Dum Dum Cantonment, Kolkata is in ruins now
@okishira9274 жыл бұрын
It's sad thing
@aaravtulsyan4 жыл бұрын
@@okishira927 its a bloody great thing
@jpweek58853 жыл бұрын
Clive slit his own throat in the end. That is also a bloody great thing.
@flyingafrinak69583 жыл бұрын
Good news
@bclassic24744 жыл бұрын
Mir jafar has become synonymous for traitor here in bengal.
@amaantariq23484 жыл бұрын
all over south asia pakistanis call nawaz sharif as mir jafar lol
@abhinavbhat58824 жыл бұрын
All muslims are mir Jafar trailtors and two faced
@amaantariq23484 жыл бұрын
@@abhinavbhat5882 okay jai chand
@amaantariq23484 жыл бұрын
@Ęxtřəmé Hűñteŕ everyone forgets the treasonous hindus of bengal the bhadralok
@bclassic24744 жыл бұрын
@@amaantariq2348 with mir madan only Mohan lal a hindu general of nawab died fighting while covering yhe retreat of siraj.
@napoleonbonapartelempereur95024 жыл бұрын
I am from Murshidabad. My Bengal was at that time RICHER than Entire Britain.Bengal contributed 12%World GDP according to the Economic Statistics or British Economist Angus Madison. Victory at Plassey made the fortune of British. British were opened to ENORMOUS WEALTH of BENGAL. This Wealth aided them to win over the French in Seven Years War and in their Industrial Revolution. Love to French people for always helping us to fight against the British. J'aime la France ,les français et la langue française beaucoup ❤️ ❤️❤️❤️ Vive la France 🇫🇷🇫🇷 Vive l'Inde🇮🇳🇮🇳
@inderpreetsingh74294 жыл бұрын
Um that might be a little bit exaggerated
@trollhippo83654 жыл бұрын
@@inderpreetsingh7429 It isn't . Bengal Subah during Mughal Rule was the richest area in the world .
@napoleonbonapartelempereur95024 жыл бұрын
@@inderpreetsingh7429 There is nothing exaggeration here. Go nd Search about the Angus Madison Historical Economic Statistics and Bengal Subah. India was always the RICHEST CIVILIZATION of the world along with China. Bengal was heart of her contributing half of Indian GDP in 18 th Century.Because of British Colonization India became so poor. India used to be called 'The Jewel in the Crown of British Empire'. This might still be an exaggeration to them who always believe in white supremacy but in reality it is not.
@vip1298704 жыл бұрын
World has changed a lot since then. Jagat Seths (Jain Bankers) were the richest in India and the World.
@mf112104 жыл бұрын
I agree Bengal was quite rich at that time. This is why Bengal was under attack by the Mughals (13th - 18th century) and their Indian Army again and again!
@jabronjunklove7604 жыл бұрын
"Mir, Jafar, wherever you are I believe that the Siraj does go on" . -- Celine Dion. . . . .of Bengal
@ihatemotionblur_32553 жыл бұрын
this battle is just so majestic and aweful. Reading the way that the battle played out is just so wondrous
@metalheadtaz2 жыл бұрын
Robert Clive was a brilliant general. Astute military leader. What a guy! What a battle!
@disrxt4 жыл бұрын
The 'Honourable' East India Company? That bunch of homicidal maniacs seems to have had a dry sense of humor.
@saptsagn36974 жыл бұрын
@Talûn-karkû The Warchief yeah, traders totally need to build Forts in India.
@jamesturner44784 жыл бұрын
@@saptsagn3697 It's called conquest. Are Europeans supposed to apologise because we're better?
@jamesturner44784 жыл бұрын
@anonymous opinions The overall effect of European colonization especially on India was positive.
@saptsagn36974 жыл бұрын
@@jamesturner4478 That's what Western media tells you
@rogerreyne18774 жыл бұрын
@@jamesturner4478 white guilt can be dreadful
@DavidSaintloth4 жыл бұрын
Did you just say "honorable eat India company" without vomiting??? Impressive.
@KingsandGenerals4 жыл бұрын
It was the official name
@tentathesane80324 жыл бұрын
that was literally their name lmao. only the english could be so ostensible
@EnoshII4 жыл бұрын
who would win, an Indian fort or one drunken Englishman?
@khalilderbali66284 жыл бұрын
One drunken Englishman of course
@abhisheknanda99564 жыл бұрын
Who would win an alliance of Indian empires with the British or one tiger boy. Spoilers if they ever made videos on anglo-mysore wars(1st,2nd,3rd and 4th)
@anjusanal4 жыл бұрын
Well it's just a story but hey, stories are fun!
@shoshankosen12804 жыл бұрын
Both will win. But naive Bengali will lose!
@SteymarStark4 жыл бұрын
@Ęxtřəmé Hűñteŕ what about Plassey? :D
@batoorkhan40264 жыл бұрын
Thank you Kings and generals. Was waiting eagerly for videos on subcontinent. ♥️
@saebaryo82934 жыл бұрын
I am a resident of kolkata or you can say Calcutta. Amazed to see you did good research in making these videos . Continue making these...we're in support of you.
@shoshankosen12804 жыл бұрын
Most of the Bengali people around the world learned a hard lesson from this and moved on. I have met many English people in my life and none of them is anything like Captain Clive or any other English warrior at that time in Bengal. They are mostly nice, intelligent & peace loving people. Painful events like Battle of Plassey tore us apart but it also made us more resilient. Let's continue to live with peace and love for all races. Whether you are Bengali, English or Spanish, all races are equal in the eyes of God. God bless us!
@nathanremix58004 жыл бұрын
British Empire In World History Book : 🙂 British Empire In British History Book : 🙂 British Empire In India History Book : 👹
@ahzam28624 жыл бұрын
Which world history book praised British? Or any colonials for that matter?
@nathanremix58004 жыл бұрын
@@ahzam2862 most of the west
@Dustz924 жыл бұрын
@@nathanremix5800 Change that to English speaking west please. Certainly not in lots of European countries
@samichaudhry99294 жыл бұрын
Charlie Read *the British weren’t needed in India*
@ahzam28624 жыл бұрын
@@nathanremix5800 I asked about world history not the self obsessed countries.
@golazomedia5314 жыл бұрын
Hello Kings and Generals. It's always exited to see your new video comes out. Could you please deliver the memorable Battle of Surabaya (against the Great Britain)? It was probably the toughest, hardest, and bloodiest war in history of Indonesia in the aim of protecting its independence. Indonesian, which is just declared their freedom, fought with very limited armament but precisely it evokes a sense of nationalism. We commemorate it every November 10 as Hero's Day and remind it as "the rise of the wounded bull".
@curious_one11564 жыл бұрын
Also, the Anglo-Mysore wars.
@arijitbiswas22374 жыл бұрын
Very nicely presented.... Kudos to the creator of this video
@ztemaxgaming86204 жыл бұрын
Was waiting for this for forever!
@jaforreza43393 жыл бұрын
This is a very small battle compared to others! But this small battle is so much significant that it changed the history of Indian subcontinent for the next 200 Years approximately
@rdatta3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video and treatment of the battle and the Carnatic wars leading up to these events. What has always bothered me is the incredible discrepancy between the force sizes and the small scale of losses. Clive only lost 22 men in a whole day of fighting and the Bengals losses were less than 2% of forces. Mir Jafar's actions clearly influenced the day but wouldn't the Bengals also had reconnaissance, scouts and an understanding of the lay of the land. They seemed to have quit far too easily.
@mayankkamboj40259 ай бұрын
Exactly my observation too. From watching many medieval war videos, and playing some games like EU4, I felt that having such a decisive numbers advantage meant you'd almost certainly win. Seems like that's not the case here.
@Bostonite19854 жыл бұрын
I am from Madras (called Chennai now). It is really sad to see people of Madras taking sides with Robert Clive on his mission from Madras to Calcutta as part of his army. Back then no one in South gave a damn about what happened in the North, East or Western part of India and the consequences of taking sides with the British. But then we did not have a choice as we needed British support to fight against the French who were hell bent on colonising South India.
@Aeyekay04 жыл бұрын
Great video, interesting as always, keep up the good work