Canon 24-105mm is the ONLY Camera Lens You Need

[@mondobytes]

Love my 24-105 lens! Even at F4 the bokeh is still creamy and since I use an FX3 F4 isn’t a problem since I can crank it to 12,800 ISO and be fine in low light situations.

[@connormccaskill]

Oh yeah man! A Sony + 24-105 is a killer combo! Making me jealous ha

[@mondobytes]

@@connormccaskill there’s room for one more. 😉 “One of us, one of us”

[@MrFreddGG]

@@mondobytes totalmente, la gente se vuelve loca y se obsesiona al solo querer tener lentes 1.8 o 2.8. Teniendo lentes tan buenos como el 24 - 105

[@mikehunt576]

no decent low light performance though guys, better off with a tiny toy camera!

[@justesmond]

I have the Canon RF 24-105L IS. I have come to love this lens. I also have the 28-70 as a photo lens, but nothing beats the versatility of the 24-105. If I were honest I'd say that the f/4 aperture was the thing that gave me pause using the lens. But as I have gained more experience, I realize that the Canon L series 24-105 lens is very sharp and is about as close to the perfect walkaround lens in the Canon lineup.

[@connormccaskill]

I totally agree!

[@dje7917]

That lens if soft

[@StormRider1145]

hello , is 28-70 much sharper in yours opinion ?

[@JaredHoyman]

I had the 24-105 EF 10yrs ago on my 6D and it produced amazing images that i have framed in my house. I have been shooting with the 24-70 2.8 rf for the last couple of yrs on my RF cameras and I still wonder if i should have saved $1k and just went with the 24-105. On a side note i have the 70-200 f4 rf and i cant recommend it enough. Super light and just stays in my bag all the time. Totally worth it.

[@connormccaskill]

I mean both the 24-70 and 70-200 pretty much cover everything you would ever need, but yeah there is something special about the 24-105! It's cool to hear that you enjoyed using it for photography! I mostly use it for video work

[@arb009]

@@connormccaskillgreat video on this lens. It’s on my list to buy. So i have an R6 mark 2 and I am into portrait photography. Do I get the 24-105 f4L, 70-200f4L or 28-70 ISM STM

[@ReubenLiu13]

I own two RF24-105s and they've come in really handy for documentary-style and "live broadcasting" scenarios. It's a must have in any production kit especially in situations where you don't have the time and luxury of switching lenses.

[@connormccaskill]

Exactly

[@Graham-uw4op]

want to sell one?

[@davey_gravy]

In 2023 I think an f4 less is a great option! So versatile and underrated. Great video dude!

[@connormccaskill]

Absolutely! Thanks man!

[@ChristopherGoetting]

The lovely thing about the R6II (or other modern fullframes) is that you can shoot f/4 in a dim room at ISO 12800 and not even notice the ISO is that high unless you look at the info view. If you do care about the bit of grain thats there, just bump the correction slider to 5 or 10 and call it a day. The f/2.8 isnt going to get you much more out of focus in the background, so if that's really what you want you need a prime (or the 28-70 f/2) anyhow. I love my 24-105, but did just pick up the 24mm f/1.8 for a lightweight walkaround alternative (or for gimbal, since I pretty much exclusively shoot with that at 24mm anyhow, and a 50mm if I want something else).

[@connormccaskill]

Appreciate your input man! Thanks for the comment

[@cosmindanes9435]

What do you mean by "bump up the correction slider"?

[@ChristopherGoetting]

@@cosmindanes9435 noise correction in Lightroom

[@ushirogeri8085]

"The f/2.8 isnt going to get you much more out of focus in the background"... really?

[@pruett89]

I got this same lens when I bought my R6 and I totally, 100% agree! It can do it all and gets really great results!

[@connormccaskill]

Yeah man! It’s definitely not the most exciting, but it is just so reliable ha. Thanks for the comment 🤙🏻

[@croaker4747]

R5 mk I user: The RF 24-105mm 2.8 is actually the perfect all around lens. Expensive, but pretty much one and done for most applications. Seriously, best lens I’ve ever owned.

[@afriquelesud]

In your limited use case, perhaps. There's a big world out there. Can you shoot a lion 400 yards away with that? As you cannot walk up to it and ask it to smile, or say "cheese!". 😂😂

[@Am94514]

@@afriquelesudIt depends on your work bro if you love wild life go get 500mm or whatever don’t be mad about what we love about this 105mm lens 😅

[@damasovi_travels1244]

I still do not get it why people say "boring" to describe a lense, it is not a Ferrari you know! This is a dream lense for me, covers like 98% of my images and not as expensive as a F2.8 and also not as heavy. Cool video and bad jockes that I like! lol! my gf keeps saying "dad jockes" and I am dad so like! Cheers from Mexico

[@connormccaskill]

Absolutely! The weight difference is a big deal for me because I use a gimbal. I appreciate you commenting!

[@adude394]

After 2+ decades of DSLR only, I finally added mirrorless to my gear bag, the R5 and R6 Mk II. The 24-105 EF has been my favorite all-purpose lens for some time now. Versatile, lightweight, and a great walkaround lens. The first two RF lenses I got were the 100-500 and 200-800, which have been excellent on both camera bodies, and I used my 24-105 EF via the EF > RF adapter. I decided that I wanted the RF version of the lens (not the newer Z version that costs quite a lot more, and which I understand is quite heavy). Mine should arrive tomorrow, and really looking forward to putting it through its paces!

[@arb009]

Any updates on the lens ? Do you recommend ?

[@adude394]

@@arb009 Love it! I've had good results with it on the R5, R6 Mk II, and also on the R5 Mk II I recently picked up. I'd absolutely recommend it as an excellent do-it-all lens.

[@arb009]

@@adude394 i’m glad to know the lens is really great. I have the R6 mark 2 and I’m looking for a lens gnats great for indoors and portraits photography… Would you recommend the 24-105f4L or 70-200 f4L? Also what niche are you?

[@adude394]

@@arb009 I'm really just an avid hobbyist, and I particularly enjoy bird/wildlife/nature/landscape photography. Regarding the two lenses you list, I guess it boils down to what you plan to use it for. For me, I think that the 24-105 would be the one for indoors/portrait photography. OTOH, I know that I've seen professionals post on YT singing the praises of the 70-200 in the same situations. Full disclosure, I have added the 70-200 to my wish list on B&H, though I don't expect to move on it until next year. I would think the larger one would give you the advantage of the added reach if you were shooting outdoors.

[@danielcharlesfilms2897]

I used to shoot the hell out of my EF mount 24-105 f4 canon on my Ronin M. Honestly so underrated!!

[@connormccaskill]

Very underrated!

[@MadXDax]

used to be really into photography wanted to make it my career but my old camera stopped working and i figured seeing as how old it is i could probably get better pictures on my phone but I've quickly come to realize this just isn't true, i miss the feeling of holding a camera controlling so much more features, so i went a head and bought this exact setup, the EOS r6 mii with the 24-105 lens i always appreciate your advice and help keep it up.

[@baracskatibor1898]

I would be interested in your opinions. How is this lens paired with the Canon R100?

[@MODESTYXO205]

Would you recommend the Sony a7iv,fx3, zv-e1, or Canon r6 m2 for vlog/doc content? I also like to take pictures occasionally. great content

[@connormccaskill]

Hmmmm, difficult choice man. probably the Sony a7IV if you're trying to do all of those things. the FX3 is a wonderful doc camera, but the photos are lacking.

[@MODESTYXO205]

@@connormccaskill thanks for the feedback what's your take on the r5c

[@connormccaskill]

The R5c is an interesting camera. It’s solid, but requires a lot of extra things to make it work well. Personally not my favorite

[@TimLucasdesign]

I would argue you get better Bokeh with this lens than the 24-70 f2.8 because at 105, the extra telephoto is more beneficial than the extra stop.

[@danny8888]

Yup! Canon 24-105mm F4 have been used before, very useful in any situation! 👍

[@Uisci81]

I just ordered this lens, can't wait to use it. I have the 15-35 and the 100-500 and Iv found myself needing something in between when I couldn't reach enough but 100-500 was complete overkill and an obstacle to use in the location I'm at.

[@paullucas898]

You haven't switched to Panasonic full-time? Still have a place for the R6ii?

[@connormccaskill]

I switched to the Lumix for all of my YT content, however, I still use the R6 for my commercial work primarily because the guys I film with are all on Canon. Keeps it simple to use one system

[@david.stachon]

It basically lives on my a7siii. The sony version is not parfocal, but pretty damn close. I zoom with it all the time when shooting video and it does a great job.

[@connormccaskill]

That’s awesome 👏

[@Gnat7322]

I love how you gave examples thank you!!

[@connormccaskill]

Of course! Glad you enjoyed

[@amirchar]

How well does the f4L of this lens do in low light/dusk or dawn?

[@connormccaskill]

For me it has worked fine, but you have to be comfortable raising the iso a bit.

[@klaymoon1]

Amazing video! May I ask you which lens and camera did you use to shoot this video when you are holding 24-105 in your hand?

[@connormccaskill]

I think I filmed with the LUMIX S52X with the 35mm prime lens

[@klaymoon1]

@@connormccaskill That's a fantastic video quality. Thanks!

[@dalopcor]

I've just bought an R8 with this lens, to replace my old 77D and a bunch of lenses (17-50mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8 and a 70-300). I'm excited to test it this weekend.

[@grzegorzcaputa]

I mostly use the 24-70mm sigma art 2.8 lens with my Sony a7c

[@connormccaskill]

Nothing wrong with that! Great choice still

[@alexmelia8873]

I have the kit 24-105 f4-7.1 and I am eyeing upgrading to this lens. I’d like to keep the f4 at longer focal lengths and the clicking control ring for aperture would be nice bs the smooth ring on the 4-7.1

[@efreutel]

Very well done review. Great videography and photography. Many thanks 👍👍👍

[@ginamariephotography]

Does the original R5 have the crop thing? Thanks in advance!

[@jelsbabez]

Hey question! What would you recommend for low light scenarios?

[@AryanSharma-dl6uj]

Sir, I have a doubt. For example, when we click a photo of a person, will the entire body of the person with this lens and does it create a good blur effect? I’m talking about the 24-105mm f/4 lens.please reply me I have canon R7

[@Jashandeepsingh-tx5ov]

Great video, which camera and lens did you use in this video?

[@connormccaskill]

I used the Lumix S52X with the 35mm 1.8

[@kthlnmae]

Great video! Can you please share a link of the gimbal you were using? 😊

[@connormccaskill]

Absolutely! - DJI Ronin RS3 Pro: amzn.to/3qPJoB9

[@connormccaskill]

Although I have a video about the new DJI gimbal if you care to watch

[@cajaledu]

Is it loud when focusing? And if it is, is it noticeable in videos?

[@lindamast1250]

I'm hesitating between purchasing a lens, namely the RF 24-105 f4 and the 24-240 f4 - 6.3. I want to use this lens for travel. On the one hand I think the 24-105, but if I want to photograph an animal a little further away, I don't have enough zoom, but on the other hand I read that the 24-240 gives somewhat blurrier corners and has to be cropped in lightroom. due to vignette at 24mm. I need help choosing.

[@SolidBrixStudios]

I dunno man, RF 24-70 f2.8 has been the perfect workhorse lens for me. If I need more reach, 1.6x crop mode gets me to 112mm…

[@connormccaskill]

Fair enough man, the 24-70mm is a solid choice for sure

[@mr.s4849]

My Panasonic 24-105 f4 (OIS) for my S5 is almost the only lens I use. When it gets super dark I might switch to a 1.8 prime.

[@connormccaskill]

That’s awesome 👏

[@koobs4549]

I have three 5D bodies (Mk 1, 2, & 4) the 24-70L f/2.8, 50 f/1.2L, & 70-200 f/2.8L is. I decided to sell them for a Leica Q2 or Q2M but wanted to keep the Mark iv body & 50mm f/1.2 L. I think I’d be much better off selling the 50 too & getting a 2nd hand 24-105 f/4 is instead. It should be able to cover everything I won’t be able to do on the Leica.

[@connormccaskill]

Jealous of that Leica ha! But yeah that could possibly be a better option for you

[@koobs4549]

@@connormccaskill I ended up selling almost all of my Canon gear, including 3 digital models, 3 Canon film cameras, a Leica M3 with 2 lenses & a ton of accessories, & a Rolleiflex TLR. That was enough to cover almost all the cost on a 2nd hand Q2M (within $800). I did end up keeping my 5D mark iv for color work & now I’m looking for a 2nd hand 24-105mm.

[@connormccaskill]

Wow, that's a lot! Do you feel like it was a solid trade? @@koobs4549

[@MarioBenites]

Thank you for this video. One question: What camera and lense did you use for this video? Excellent color grading!

[@connormccaskill]

Thank you! I used the Lumix S52X with the 35mm 1.8. It’s all linked in my description if you want to check out everything I use

[@MarioBenites]

@@connormccaskill I knew it wasn't a Canon camera! 😁 And I am happy because I have Lumix S5 Mark II with Sigma 24-70mm f2.8. The colors of this camera are amazing, I made a night test here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aKfSfYGvas55bpI

[@connormccaskill]

Yeah I’m really happy with the colors from Lumix

[@CandidProductions]

Would you say this lens would be very good for a canon rebel t7 body?

[@blaspayri]

thanks for your interesting point of view. I got the Canon RF 24-105L IS as a kit lens with my R6II. I just watched your video for some kind of validation and comforting. It is practical for exterior shooting, where you can reframe with ease and it is stable. I'd like a faster lens though, and there is the lack of choice from canon: the small prime lenses are cheap and seem nice and do some macro, but they have a slow autofocus for video. And the pro prime lenses are big and heavy, expensive, but they are faster and have a responsive AF. And the faster zoom lenses are really front heavy, expensive and cumbersome, though good quality. SO there is no perfect lens for my purpose (gimbal work with moving subjects dancing).

[@lordnelson63]

Subscribed. I just moved to the mirrorless world (R6 II to be precise) and while initially wanted to keep my EF lenses, decided not to and move to the RF glass world. I will be going to Greece in about a month, and want to minimize the number of lenses to bring (just 2). I am definitely bringing my RF 14-35mm F4, so the decision is which second (and my "on-camera") should I bring: My RF 24-105mm F4? Or should I bring my RF 24-70mm F4? Given I am on a vacation trip, I think having the extra focal length would be beneficial vs having a wider aperture. Thoughts? Your video is convincing me more to bring the 24-105 F4 given the extra focal length and size/weight.

[@connormccaskill]

Yeah I think the extra reach will be more beneficial for you!

[@edualapont]

I agree on everything but for gimbal I prefer the canon 17-40, lighter cheaper and with internal zoom,

[@connormccaskill]

Fair point! I guess I can just get away with it because the DJI Ronin 3 is just so strong

[@sara_b]

I was thinking about buying only this lens for my R6 mark II and this video sealed the deal! I hope it'll be just as good for some product shots and food photography as well

[@jessejayphotography]

RF 24-70 f/2.8 better overall imho.I just use crop mode for extra reach when I need it and it becomes a 38-112mm

[@connormccaskill]

That’s definitely a fair argument! I think the lighter weight of the 24-105 personally works better for me

[@jessejayphotography]

@@connormccaskill yeah, the RF 24-70 is a jonky boy.

[@JakeHolder]

LUMIX s5ii or the r6ii? I cannot make up my mind and you are showing canon lenses while your description says you use a lumix 😂 please help

[@connormccaskill]

I use both! But I’d pick LUMIX personally rn

[@JakeHolder]

@@connormccaskillyou’re awesome

[@templeoftarot]

Is the auto focus quiet on this lens for shooting video?

[@imagemakerssociety]

I'm going to photographing a couple. I will be photgraphing them inside an old theater and some outdoor shots as well. Mostly shots close range up to maybe 15-20 feet or so. I cannot decide between this 24-105 or a 35mm 1.8. Any thoughts, suggestions? Someone please help! lol :)

[@ThiagoMatuo]

Not only the aperture, check also the sharpeness, that makes a huge difference, but be aware of how much noise your camera have on low light. I have an APC-C camera and anything more than f3.5 in low light means a lot of noise and a lot of work in post processing. Today I use two lens, a 50mm f1.8 and a 100mm f2 due to low light situations and to be honest, I don't mind to be moving around taking the photos and as a beginner, I also feel that I learn a lot doing that. For you, I'd go with the 35mm f1.8, but also having a 50mm would be great.

[@MrJonbennett23]

Question: i own the Rf 24-105 F4-7.1 lens. i like to shoot 50mm & 85mm detail video shots (real estate) should i upgrade to the F4 or do you think there is much difference in the cheaper F4-7.1 lens

[@connormccaskill]

I think a constant aperture is an amazing upgrade for any zoom lens. I think it’s worth it if you can spare the money

[@shinan6760]

What about the STM version?

[@therandomranch]

What gimbal is this? I did not see in your links? Thx

[@connormccaskill]

Here’s a link to the gimbal - DJI Ronin RS3 Pro: amzn.to/3qPJoB9

[@connormccaskill]

But I’ve updated my gimbal since then. Consider checking out my RS4 Pro video

[@therandomranch]

Thank you. Will look at your video too.

[@Jashandeepsingh-tx5ov]

Nice video quality,which camera and lens did you use

[@connormccaskill]

Check the description

[@eitanslivko8600]

thanks this video really helped me pick out what lens i need

[@connormccaskill]

Glad it helped bro

[@2bfrank657]

In this age of high performance digital cameras, it seems weird to me how obsessed some people get about a single stop of aperture. I've heard people say that "f/2.8 is a must" in low light, despite it only being one stop faster than f/4. You'd think low light photography would have been impossible back in days of 100 ISO film! Besides, f/2.8 isn't anything special when compared to primes. The 24-105 f/4 is probably what I'll buy when i switch over to mirrorless - looks like a really nice lens 👍

[@jamesdaleyuk]

Subscribed! Great video. Do you have a video or information on the gimbal that you use?

[@connormccaskill]

I do! Here it is kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXfXiICYebeFoMk

[@kenji_streetbomber6998]

Its ok if i used it on my canon 90d?

[@connormccaskill]

This lens is on RF mount so it won’t work on the 90d

[@micheleastolfi6708]

is it worth to upgrade from EF version? i have a r6 mk ii, mainly video, THANKS

[@crisisactor420]

I've been using an A7iii with a Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 for B-Roll footage at work. I'm old and boring and shoot mostly sports, so I still use a nice camcorder, not sexy but gets the job done. Finally pulled the trigger on an A7iii for myself and bought the F4 24-105 G OSS along with it... I wanted a long focal length but 70-200 seemed like overkill. Also I got a good deal on a barely used one. It was a big purchase and I was honestly regretting not going with the 24-70 off the bat. BUT the more I use it, the more I love it. Eventually I'll buy the 24-70 because I will need better low light shots when Soccer season starts up for me. I will say for people totally brand new to mirrorless, I wouldn't get this lens. Yes I love it, just wish it wasn't the only lens I have.

[@BoReynolds]

I'm actually using the EF-L version and I STILL love it on my R50 and M50-2

[@vimalneha]

Useful insights and many pro photographers have said that, something makes it not ignorable. I would highly appreciate it if you could make a comparison with 24-105 2.8 lens

[@lilmoldavite]

Is this lens good for photography I’m trying to get this lens for my r50 cannon

[@alvintelin]

wait for the sigma one. its made for apsc camera.

[@jeroendehaas3897]

Which gimble do you use?

[@connormccaskill]

RS4 Pro. I have a video on my channel if you’re interested

[@zee9493]

Does this lens works with canon eos 550d or not!

[@gurbigurb1289]

Would this be a good lens for canon r8?

[@connormccaskill]

Absolutely

[@gintokigriffiths1086]

whichg lens was filming this video

[@connormccaskill]

I think the LUMIX 35mm

[@HoseVilelaLetona]

What is your gimbal?

[@stevenwaldstein2249]

Clearly an under valued lens in both Canon EF and RF and Sony FE mount where I have owned it. It the first lens I buy for any system and then grow out from there. Easy to recommend and also affordable. Take care.

[@filmsby_AD]

what gimbal do you use?

[@connormccaskill]

I use the RS4 pro. I have a video on my channel you can check out

[@sydneychuka4304]

This video feels different now that the 2.8 version is out

[@TheMikey2003]

Is this the usm or stm lens

[@VlogCity]

The Honda Civic of lenses. Is it sexy? No. Does it have amazing stats? No. But it'll get ya about anywhere ya need to go

[@connormccaskill]

😂

[@cas818028]

I actually use this thing on my r50 and I have captured some amazing shots with it

[@dvdaltizer2]

I hate this lens. Use it constantly 😂

[@connormccaskill]

Haha

[@samuelwebster2769]

I'm also using it to much lol

[@dccd673]

I’m in the same boat.

[@tronziebit]

😬 I can't ignore it is F4, and stinky, but so versatile, you can't overlook it. I would seriously consider it. Thank you for sharing.

[@connormccaskill]

Haha the f4 is definitely stinky. What is your go to lens rn?

[@indyjones720]

I’ve owned this lens for a long time and it’s the only lens I use…even for professional work. I’m don’t own any other lenses. Maybe one day when I’m rich and famous I’ll buy the 2.8 version but from what I’ve seen, the IQ isn’t much different.

[@connormccaskill]

It's just so reliable

[@Ingwar-h9s]

thank you. you give him chance 😃

[@Matt-dx2mk]

I believe (not positive) that if you shoot on an m50 like me, and use the viltrox speed booster instead of the standard adapter, 1. you get the range of 27-120, but you also get to drop the f/stop to 2.8 which is awesome :)

[@lubanestube]

excellent lens!

[@connormccaskill]

It really is the GOAT ha

[@francoisgs1]

Thanks

[@jondemetrius]

Love it!!!

[@truthseeker6804]

if you want less noise in low light, dont use log in low light. massive difference.

[@connormccaskill]

Ah good tip! I'll have to mess with that

[@MustafaShaheen]

Beard lookin good, brother.

[@connormccaskill]

Ha thanks man! Hope you’ve been well

[@briantorsell]

I never thought I'd see Buffalo in the same list as Maui, lol. There's not much going on here.

[@ichimichael111]

good vid

[@connormccaskill]

Good comment

[@petrub27]

you live in chatanoonga

[@connormccaskill]

I don't, but I love Chatt so I try to visit every once in awhile

[@Lubo54]

👍👍👍EXCELENT

[@pietwijdenes7646]

I can really find youre opinion in mine!

[@connormccaskill]

Awesome

[@GDoggProductions]

.....Do you still rate this lens in 2024 ? 😅

[@SeguraCine]

😚😚😚😚Good goal, I'll buy it

[@nycekix]

@1:15 the flip flops with the pants!??? UNSUBSCRIBED!

[@afriquelesud]

Stupid comment from someone that don't understand how we shoot in Africa. Try creep up to a pride of lions, or a rhino, or a hippopotamus, an elephant, leopard with that tiny toy. Reach starts at 600mm, then can go to 1200mm. What is 105mm going to afford you? Taking indecent shots of sparrow cloaca? I sometimes wonder why some live in such small worlds, that they neither see nor imagine beyond their own small back yards. Get some exposure!!

[@CalProd]

I enjoy your content, brother 👏 new sub from me

[@troyflatland5299]

“Lens stabilization has become a necessary necessity” lmfao wtf did you make it through kindergarten?

[@Hardik1515]

Koi gift kr do bhai 😢❤😅

[@troyflatland5299]

Saying New York but meaning Buffalo is embarrassing

[@mattburke8284]

Go Bills

[@thatboypat07]

Almost got this lens but I need a fast versatile lens so I went with the 24-70 2.8 canon of course

[@connormccaskill]

Definitely still a great option! Are you more of a video or photo shooter?

[@thatboypat07]

@@connormccaskill mainly photographer but i been merging into the video spectrum. But I got the 24-70 when the canon r first came out. Bought this and the 85rf 1.2 but I broke my 85 😭😭💔💔

[@connormccaskill]

Oh no! Sad day. Good you still have the 24-70 to keep you going