The adoption of Buddhism post-Kalinga war is a myth. Ashoka had turned to Buddhism long before the War of Kalinga. He probably did it for political intentions as the Amatyas of Magadh were not happy with how Ashoka gained the throne. In their eyes, Ashoka's brother Susheema was the rightful heir as declared by Bindusara.
@JohnAdams-vd5dc Жыл бұрын
The West will never acknowledge this because of their anti-Hindu agenda.
@arpan9937 Жыл бұрын
Plus it was not something like conversion at that time it was just another sect of dharma in ancient India. He the made Buddha the main deity of the empire.
@WolfofAsia012 Жыл бұрын
also later Buddhist scholars wanted to show Ashoka in Bright light and pecaeful cause he embraced Buddhism. They also wrote extensively about contrast of Ashoka after and before accepting Buddhism to show that Buddhism leads to peace, In reality, history might be much brightening
@Contractor48 Жыл бұрын
Jay vardhan Singh is the most based history channel.
@AshfaqurBF Жыл бұрын
I hate it when H!ndus keep changing their statements on Ashoka's conversion. At first, I saw innumerable H!ndus, who never knew about Ashoka's conversion. When it was proven that Ashoka really converted, the H!ndus started to deny this. Then, the H!ndus started to say "It was Ashoka's wish" Then, after a few months, H!ndus starts to claim that "Ashoka converted before Kalinga war" Answer me this: If Ashoka really converted before Kalinga war, why did he k!ll Budhhists? Also, do you have any source backing up your claim? Or, its just a claim from your ego?
@supremegodemperordonaldtru3563 Жыл бұрын
There is a common myth that Ashoka was nearly entirely forgotten in the millenia after his passing until recent history. However the truth is Ashoka was a revered figure in Sri Lanka for 2300 years. Ashoka was never forgotten in SL where even today kids are named "Ashoka" and after his children "Sanghamitra"/"Mahindra"
@عليياسر-ذ5ب Жыл бұрын
Ashoka: Why do they want to be deviants or do they want to be slaves of the Scythians?
@akhripasta2670 Жыл бұрын
Ashoka was never forgotten He was well alive in Odia & Bengali literature
@SerCrispinCole Жыл бұрын
not just in lanka, ashoka is still remembered and he is an important part of indian history. and not to forget ashoka chakra on our flag, the emblem and much more
@Informativeeye Жыл бұрын
India did not had handpump.
@manjunathareddy654811 ай бұрын
Ashoka is a common name in India too! Stop stealing our culture
@stephenschroeder6567 Жыл бұрын
Great presentation! Thank you for your efforts. All empires fall - there are no exceptions.
@Thomas-lg6jx Жыл бұрын
Roman Empire still going .
@JoeWithTheHoesBiden Жыл бұрын
Maniot republic succeeded Byzantium which succeeded east Rome which succeeded Rome and that created modern day Greece so nah, Rome is still going
@m.aryaanamiri2755 Жыл бұрын
@@JoeWithTheHoesBidenthe ottomans and holy Romans succeed Rome.Holy Romans because of the Pope's recognition.And ottoman because of the ecumenical patriarch's recognition and the right of conquest.
@riderchallenge4250 Жыл бұрын
lol no empire lasts long@@Thomas-lg6jx
@JoeWithTheHoesBiden Жыл бұрын
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 no, they never fully conquer rome maniot peninsula still hold on until 1770s where it become vassal, then maniots declared greek independence in 1821, causing the formation of greece from maniot peninsula turkish try to take maniot republic many times but fail in disaster
@cjthebeesknees Жыл бұрын
Same reason Rome and Byzantium (eastern romans) collapsed.. 80% infighting and division from within and 20% mix of outside forces, complacency and decay.
@christiandauz3742 Жыл бұрын
The Roman Republic wished it had Industrialized back in 500 BCE Then they would have taken over the entire world
@prasanth2601 Жыл бұрын
@@christiandauz3742 Same goes for other empires too
@arishemghoul9571 Жыл бұрын
@@christiandauz3742I am pretty sure that goes back to every empires
@Thomas-lg6jx Жыл бұрын
Still going
@user_____M Жыл бұрын
The Roman state lasted for over 2000 years since its founding, and you're comparing it to a historical "nothing-burger" that collapsed almost as soon as it was formed. A comparison to Alexander the Great's empire would be fitting.
@yarnaiyar Жыл бұрын
Never seen such a detailed video about Great Maurya empire. I hope you will make more videos about indian history in Future. Love from india❤❤
@Knowledgia Жыл бұрын
There will be definatelly more!
@eukgiergios Жыл бұрын
Yeah I want more on the Mughals
@ulrich4717 Жыл бұрын
Isn't there any production of historical video documentaries in India?
@eukgiergios Жыл бұрын
@@ulrich4717 Yeah but their mostly in Hindi and Urdu. Also their Biased.
@reddragon100 Жыл бұрын
There are few mistakes in video for example chanakya encountered chandragupta as young child in magadha as he was leaving not adult
@akbrahma7739 Жыл бұрын
Funfact : Chandragupta Maurya had an army 2 times the size of the modern Indian army today, back in 300 BCE. It is believed that 1 in every 5 male was part of his huge army.
@akbrahma7739 Жыл бұрын
@Iamnotracistlmao yes that's what I'm saying 600,000 is 2X the size of modern Indian army in 2023.
@mubasharnaseer3999 Жыл бұрын
Back then army and peasantry were the only two common professions. All the others like teachers, doctors etc were just a handful of people.
@muk4609 Жыл бұрын
@Iamnotracistlmao Agreed. This is the most likely scenario. Moving large armies in those times without locomotives would be a daunting task.
@MORTIS-n5o Жыл бұрын
Still i think Indian army with respect to our population is smaller than the Chandragupta Maurya's army with respect to their population. 6L is a lot for comparison Pak's army today stands at 6L@Iamnotracistlmao
@saifsid9512 Жыл бұрын
I think you are wrong. At that time, population of subcontinent would have been lower than current army personnel of India. So it’s impossible that you claim.
@GarudAtma Жыл бұрын
Whatever was gathered from archaeologists' research papers and books from half-destroyed texts says that Shunga wants to serve the emperor but all his fears came to reality when he saw the king openly talk about disintegrating the armed forces. Shunga knew that we were not able to defend the sub-continent from foreign invasions. Shunga after removing the Brihadat got recognized by Southern kingdoms. As he was practical and a shield of the sub-continent in return.
@pacewalk7396 Жыл бұрын
That's a pure lie
@ashrithrao06 Жыл бұрын
@@pacewalk7396Shunga’s rebellion was supported by the Ministers and was welcomed by the people as they were scared advancing enemy forces including Indians, Yavanas, Shakas from all directions.
@pacewalk7396 Жыл бұрын
@@ashrithrao06 source . Or R u making things up?
@ashrithrao06 Жыл бұрын
@@pacewalk7396 The Indo-Greeks, called Yavanas in Indian sources, either led by Demetrius I or Menander I, then invaded India, possibly receiving the help of Buddhists.[ref] The text of the Yuga Purana, which describes historical events, relates the attack of the Greeks on the capital Pataliputra, a magnificent fortified city with 570 towers and 64 gates according to Megasthenes, and describes the impending war for city. "Then, after having approached Saketa together with the Panchalas and the Mathuras, the Yavanas, valiant in battle, will reach Kusumadhvaja ["the town of the flower-standard", Pataliputra]. Then, once Puspapura [another name of Pataliputra] has been reached and its celebrated mud[-walls] cast down, all the realm will be in disorder." However, the Yuga Purana indicates that the Yavanas (Indo-Greeks) did not remain for long in Pataliputra due to strong resistance from Indian warriors.
@ashrithrao06 Жыл бұрын
@@pacewalk7396 Pushyamitra Shunga’s action had popular support. This action of Pushyamitra Shunga has been criticized as treachery to his king. But the fact is Brhadratha as a king had failed in his duty and even blocked the efforts of his senapati to save people and hence forfeited the loyalty of his subject. (At this time Magadh was on a war with Yavanas nearby Mathura) Pushyamitra Shunga did not have any selfish motive behind his action. Even after having earned recognition as Chakravartin by performing not one but two Ashwamedha sacrifices, he was content with the modest title senapati and he never assumed any imperial title. The very fact that he chose to behead the king in full view of his assembled armies proves that Pushyamitra Shunga was assured of their support. The popular feelings can be gauged from the fact that centuries later the great dramatist Kalidasa chose to celebrate in his play the lives of the members of Pushyamitra Shunga’s family.
@skylinelover9276 Жыл бұрын
Even the greeks describe India was realy hard to conquered due to their elephant warrior... The only Hellenic kingdom who conquered a piece of land of india are the Indo Greeks
@justaguyfrom Жыл бұрын
yeah the indo greeks were basically a mix between north indian and greek's so they were well aware about the strategies of the subcontinent.
@massalleh5255 Жыл бұрын
But the Turks and the Mughals had it easy
@pappipappi14 Жыл бұрын
@@massalleh5255they came india after 1500, at that time powerful indian king support them😂, if indian kings had a good relationship mughal and turks are done😂
@massalleh5255 Жыл бұрын
@@pappipappi14 Turks came before 1300
@massalleh5255 Жыл бұрын
@@pappipappi14 more like subjugated
@Ohiotag Жыл бұрын
Great Thanks for making a video on the Maurya Empire! I have always wanted to see something like this!
@campones... Жыл бұрын
Master knowledgia, bring to us more videos about acient india. Thank you for your videos Salve 🇧🇷✌️
I'm Indian , ngl it's pretty boring and distorted , and it's aesthetically unappealing .
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
And it's a very communal thing to speak about history here
@CavaleiroAgiota3 ай бұрын
Um irmão brasileiro...
@kirtigupta9753 Жыл бұрын
Chanakya the Great deserves a separate video . There's a very long TV series in India which details his life , achievements and the astute war tactician he was.
@himanshusahu6910 Жыл бұрын
@@sys9208because neo Buddhist not believe in this thing,neo Buddhists theory don't work in mainstream.chanakya was mentioned in Buddhists records as well as Jain records...also in mudraraksash...!
@VICTOR-ok3mg Жыл бұрын
Chankya was fictional character made by Brahmins
@VICTOR-ok3mg Жыл бұрын
@@himanshusahu6910give me the proof of ur chankya
@itsoblivion8124 Жыл бұрын
@@VICTOR-ok3mg arthsastra,roman traveller Justin, mahavamsa, divyavadana and vishnu purana all have mentioned Chanakya
@PahadiSher Жыл бұрын
@VICTOR-ok3mg There is no mention on Chanakya by Hindu records only by Buddhist-Jain ones, but it is Brahmin invention. Typical mootranivasi quota taker. Like bobachaap, you are also invention of UC.😂
@Knowledgia Жыл бұрын
Every time you watch our videos it helps us a lot. Your constant support means a lot to us! Thank you! Consider supporting our work and Join this channel to get access to perks: kzbin.info/door/uCuEKq1xuRA0dFQj1qg9-Qjoin You can also directly support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/Knowledgia
@mint8648 Жыл бұрын
It was because of a big government, a top-heavy, overbearing, bloated bureaucracy that could not sustain the welfare programs. There was too much taxation, and archaeological excavations from Mauryan sites do not reflect an era of particular prosperity for the common people.
@reddragon100 Жыл бұрын
Great video but just one small error I want to tell. Chanakya didnt meet him as adult. Chanakya meet chandragupta in Magadha after he was insulted by Nanda king for his ugly looks & manners while leaving & on the run, he saw a boy playing game of 'kingship' outside the palace & took him away to Taxila for further studies.
@death-istic9586 Жыл бұрын
Hi.
@indrajeetsinhjhala4213 Жыл бұрын
Ashoka was already a buddhist during Kalinga war correct your facts before uploading
@alland5308 Жыл бұрын
P
@anasevi9456 Жыл бұрын
great video, thank you on the overview on the Mauryan arc.
@Maurya1008 Жыл бұрын
The ocean of knowledge that was lost from Nalanda and Taxashila would have given more understanding about the period.
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
Ofc , also as far as I know most of the information we have about Ashok is from srilanka or Kalinga itself
@YashKumar-n7s9k5 ай бұрын
@@Kmr571-l8y lie 😂 sri lanka
@Kmr571-l8y5 ай бұрын
@@YashKumar-n7s9k ?? Buddhists sources ?
@Chahaman_हर्षित_00 Жыл бұрын
Pushyamitra Shunga was Commander in Chief of the Maurya Army. When he realized, that King Brihdrath was unable to resist Greek invasions and support Buddhists despite their support for Greek Soldiers, couldn't control and slayed down the King.
@عليياسر-ذ5ب Жыл бұрын
No, he just wanted to control power
@Dekay-Viper Жыл бұрын
yes Samrat Pushyamitra Saved bharat from Indo Greeks ⭐
@Zayn_Priyadarshin Жыл бұрын
@@Dekay-Viperland mera Fer khilji theek tha mongol se bachaya padmawati k hand maari Saalon shunga ko uske bete ne kutte k mout maara Uske baad kushan king ne invade miya
@pacewalk7396 Жыл бұрын
@@Dekay-Viperno, he was a snake. Gaddar
@kor25973 ай бұрын
One of the best kings of India
@chakraborty1989 Жыл бұрын
4:50 Ashoka started to follow buddhism after Kalinga war due to "remorse" is a propoganda piece similar to Constantine's miriam bridge miracle. Both of them are already Buddhist/Christian but need a convenient plot to go public with their "true" faith.
@Caligulashorse1453 Жыл бұрын
I do believe Constatine was a Christian now, although not as strong one if you actually study his life, you see both his many failures and his successes he understood the reason why the eastern Roman empire succeeded more than the western Roman empire was not just at economic viability, but it’s moral one too and a society without morals collapses in on itself, and what was happening in the western Roman empire, was exactly that…. greed
@Caligulashorse1453 Жыл бұрын
I also would like to point out the fact Constantine‘s mother was a Christian Helena and Constantine himself was never truly involved in the persecution although his father was they didn’t straight up, kill Christians they just got rid of their churches and buildings unlike glarius or Diocletian, who literally tortured them of course the story of Christianity does not revolve around Constatine the Empire was allready, mostly Christian in the eastern Roman empire, even before Constatine the only thing Constantine did was end the persecution it was already a unstoppable religious force in the east and it would eventually spread to the west I mean unlike any other religion in the world christianity started from mass murder of people who follow the faith and people kept converting…. So yeah
@kanishkkumar5431 Жыл бұрын
What is ur source. ... There is nthing like ashoka converted before. Kalinga... He spreaded budhhism it's all matter and ruled india in peace
@digitalbath6057 Жыл бұрын
@@kanishkkumar5431apparently sources are the rock edict he built.
@gigachad6844 Жыл бұрын
Tell me you're brahman without telling me you're brahman.
@wajidhussain5305 Жыл бұрын
The Sub-Continent and Europe had the most impressive history when it comes to different dynasties ruling and conflicts
@jorndoff2002 Жыл бұрын
Not Europe. India and China.
@TheBakuganmaster99 Жыл бұрын
Even china also. China was great back in the day. ❤
@nationmatters91911 ай бұрын
Lol, Europe 😂
@firstconsul0018 ай бұрын
Correct@@jorndoff2002
@vetiarvind8 ай бұрын
Indian sub-continent, European sub-continent and the Chinese sub-continent are the 3 major historical civilization zones.
@AntiquaRelic7 ай бұрын
One of the most underrated empire in asia
@JIJCrow Жыл бұрын
As a South African I find Indian history so interesting,oh and it wasn't just Ashoka,it was Ashoka the Great,please respect the title
@blazer9547 Жыл бұрын
Ashoka is fine in repetition.
@analyticphil8621 Жыл бұрын
its fine
@TheAztecGamer123 Жыл бұрын
It's fine. It's similar to how people don't refer to Alexander as Alexander the great all the time
@JIJCrow Жыл бұрын
@@blazer9547 I watched the whole video,nowhere did they refer to him as The Great,how come no one does this with Peter the Great or Frederick the Great?
@JIJCrow Жыл бұрын
@@TheAztecGamer123 All of them start by referring to him as Alexander the Great and proceed to call him Alexander throughout
@Atul__Maurya Жыл бұрын
Great video, few corrections.. Just like Alexander ashoka is also known as ashoka the great. Ashoka began practicing Buddhism before the kalinga war and Buddhism was never a separate religion in ancient India. It was a part of sanatan dharam.
@itsoblivion8124 Жыл бұрын
It was practiced simultaneously in India like shinto Buddhism in Japan where Buddhists offers worship to shinto gods
@Atul__Maurya Жыл бұрын
@@itsoblivion8124 bro, gautam buddha was born a hindu and till the arrival of the invaders in northern india Buddhism was never really a seperate concept. It was just a sect of the larger sanaatan dharma.
@itsoblivion8124 Жыл бұрын
@@Atul__Maurya I know. People used to worship both religions simultaneously. Bodhgaya temple is built by gupta dynasty
@kd5055 Жыл бұрын
Andhbhakt source??? Trust me bro.....
@itsoblivion8124 Жыл бұрын
@@kd5055 maski minor rock edit. Further,divyavadana and mahavamsa also said he converted to Buddhism two years before kalinga war. Only text that mentioned ashoka converted to Buddhism after kalinga war is mudrarakshas which was authored 1200 years later
@mraj7371 Жыл бұрын
Can you make a video about Cholas and Nanda Empire
@nijadbahnam9859 Жыл бұрын
Ancient India is mysterious since a lot of chronicles of the time just recorded the list of kings and weren't as story driven like Greek , Roman or Persian peers about the accomplishments of the rulers .
@karandullet380 Жыл бұрын
Most of them got burned as well due to forgine invasions
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
There were relentless foreign attacks like from the Persians , centralasia , Turks later on colonial powers etc . Most of them destroyed everything nonetheless
@AbhinandanABS Жыл бұрын
Samudragupta is the most deadliest warrior & the greatest emperor of india. he hailed from the Gupta Empire
@AshfaqurBF Жыл бұрын
The same guy who r@ped women of his enemies
@antarakmit4114 Жыл бұрын
@@AshfaqurBF dont bee-hive the haters onto your camp.
@justaguyfrom Жыл бұрын
@@AshfaqurBF yes and what he did was right those who have powers deserve to do what they want with them there is no wrong and right for those who have power above others.
@@essaadeel3676 nah, Gupta's were far better than Mauryan Empire cause they had a better economy and military compared to Mauryan Empire and is considered to be the Golden age of Bharat. If you don't believe just search it, in which era India was in its Golden age.😎😎
@DrPrashantGajbhare Жыл бұрын
Indogreeks were Mauryan relatives and ally . Shunga was also relative of Maurya in his zeal to rule he destroyed pan India Mauryan empire . Shunga was opposed by satvahan kings also for breaking Mauryan empire. Few Mauryan princes survived and rules minor kingdoms still many years
@dkh8703 Жыл бұрын
Mauryan map doesnt shows Gedrosia as it was handed over to Chandragupta Maurya by Selucus Nicator 1
@dwarasamudra8889 Жыл бұрын
Yes, and Kamrupa (Assam) was also part of the empire, at least under the empires influence anyway
@vishalmaurya296110 ай бұрын
@@dwarasamudra8889 not kamrupa, but it is known as Lauhitya as per arthshastra ... Chankya says tht emperor goods importing from lauhitya so maybe lauhitya(kamrupa named in gupta period) was part of Chandragupta empire
@ritiksharma7281 Жыл бұрын
Nice, Shunga Empire was also a prominent empire in Indian history, would you please make a video on it
@zuesmaya8167 Жыл бұрын
Shungas weren’t important at all, they can just be seen as a small transitional phase to protect eastern half of India from Greek invasion.
@arpan9937 Жыл бұрын
@@zuesmaya8167 So protecting the subcontinent is indeed important.
@user-vy5uy9fo8p Жыл бұрын
@@zuesmaya8167 Shunga brought India back from the clutches of Buddhism, that is achievement enough. Patanjali was the Amatya of Pushyamitra Shunga.
@riderchallenge4250 Жыл бұрын
Shungas were important bcz due to buddhism all became too peaceful to fight. After shunga new superpower Guptas became the main Indian Empire@@zuesmaya8167
@kanishkkumar5431 Жыл бұрын
@@user-vy5uy9fo8p yea....butcher of budhhists Pushyamitra sunga is great ruler for peacful hindus .. Sound obvious
@prasanth2601 Жыл бұрын
The Mauryan empire has to be the greatest empire the world has ever seen at that point of time. Encompassing a huge land mass with huge manpower and having good trade relations with Rome, Persia and egypt made the empire incredibly rich. If only India stayed united like this in medieval period it wouldn't have fell to invaders.
@kalenooc4938 Жыл бұрын
Bros is doesn't know Persian empire
@riche1601 Жыл бұрын
Not the greatest world wide at the time but in India yeah
@mint8648 Жыл бұрын
They didn’t know rome, they did know greece and macedonia though
@YouDouchebags792 Жыл бұрын
Indeed , Megasthenes called the city of Patliputra the greatest city in the world.
@arpan9937 Жыл бұрын
@@mint8648 Well the Romans were not a great power at that time.
@allaroundyoo11 ай бұрын
The internal challenges within the Maurya Empire, ranging from administrative inefficiencies to economic struggles, created a fragile foundation. Simultaneously, external threats in the form of invasions exacerbated the empire's vulnerabilities. The intricate dynamics of governance complexities further fueled the decline, showcasing the delicate balance required for the sustenance of any formidable empire in ancient history
@Hheshipoohbccdruiojbdssdgvbb Жыл бұрын
Bro please make more videos on indian history like bappa rawal and karkota Dynasty ❤
@TusharBedi Жыл бұрын
It’s Maurya not Moira. Pronounced Maw-Ree-Ya.
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
That's at least ok What about cha - noo - kya 😂😂😂😂
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
He also has many other names if he faces difficulty in pronunciation the name Like kautilya or vishnugupt
@deidresable11 ай бұрын
We use english here so moria is correct
@samarthpawar15042 ай бұрын
@@deidresable except it's not an english name. English doesn't have enough alphabets to write hindi and sanskrit words correctly. Hence the confusion.
@depekthegreat359 Жыл бұрын
As an Interracial person and man who is part English,Sri Lanka and Indian through my ancestries,really this powerful empire was rightfully suffered the collapse through this truth,good friends!!!🙏
@fakestar4610 Жыл бұрын
Chandragupta story is interesting when I read it from a boy playing game with his shepherd friends in streets of Pataliputra in Nanda Empire to eventually becoming the king of same empire. Dream goals from rags to riches
@depekthegreat359 Жыл бұрын
@@fakestar4610 Yeah good friend,that is extremely so correct and the Nanda Empire was so powerful during his ruling years,mainly by helping many good people and the nation on the whole!!!🙏
@CultfitDelhiNCR Жыл бұрын
@@fakestar4610he was a scion of a suryavanshi Kshatriya race.
@Uzair_Of_Babylon465 Жыл бұрын
Great video keep it up you're doing amazing things 😁👍
@sivaprakashs908211 ай бұрын
tamil nadu was never conquered by north kings due to strong military base of all three tamil kings chera chola pandiya...joint military base deployed near " thakkolam " (present near chitoor).
@AbhinandanABS11 ай бұрын
Kharavela of odisha conquered you 🥱
@cameronpillay805011 ай бұрын
@@AbhinandanABSu triggered huh 😊 even today yr north indian political parties cannot conquer the Tamil South 🐅🐅🤫😊
@bhanupratap106311 ай бұрын
Read about Battle of Manacuad.
@cameronpillay805011 ай бұрын
@AbhinandanABS I think u tried to spam bs and KZbin deleted your 💩 comment..thanks KZbin 🤣
@AbhinandanABS11 ай бұрын
@@cameronpillay8050 sad that youtube didn't save you from sri lankans 💁
@ShreeGayatriYadav5 ай бұрын
Ashok before Buddhism 😈 Ashok after Buddhism 🤡
@AdityaGupta-yi7oe Жыл бұрын
Reason for the fall of Muarya Empire, one word "Buddhism", not hate intended, but it is what it is
@pacewalk7396 Жыл бұрын
Nah , it's cuz of Brahmin snake pushmitra sunga
@AbhinandanABS11 ай бұрын
Yeah, as budhism breds weakness. Glad the shungas saved us from the greeks
@pacewalk739611 ай бұрын
@@AbhinandanABS lol, buddhism doesn't breed weakness, brahminism does by dividing the society. most buddhist countries couldn't be conquered by islamic invaders
@AbhinandanABS11 ай бұрын
@@pacewalk7396 mongols in china, arabs in afghanistan & hindus in indonesia. All of them replaced the buddhists & now are islamic..
@pacewalk739611 ай бұрын
@@AbhinandanABS that's not even 50 percent of Buddhist countries. And Indonesia was more hindu before converting to Islam.
@hnsingh68889 ай бұрын
Started by bharamin (Chanakya) Ended by bharamim ( shunga)
@PANDITDADDY-kq9uf8 ай бұрын
Yeah, Brahmins have been pretty significant throughout Indian history
@PANDITDADDY-kq9uf8 ай бұрын
@@Darius-_ Yeah, 👍
@ancientbuddhistindia8421Ай бұрын
WhatsApp history 😂 no bramhan at that time always tried to put nose in Great things
@King_ofNight8 ай бұрын
Wholesome documentary 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
@Aryan-wl1pu Жыл бұрын
If we believe in the benevolent version of Ashoka and his rule, we can see that it does not matter how one rules the empire, with compassion or with sheer might, there will always be rebels and one’s creation will be erased by time. In the popular version, Ashoka chooses the path of righteousness, lays down an excellent form of governance, and makes sure his own sons and daughters are not spoiled. In fact, he goes as far as sending his own son to Sri Lanka to spread Buddhism. He ensures that his children grow up to be moral and virtuous, but they lack the skills and qualities of a great ruler. Perhaps this is just another example that shows the cyclic nature of history: “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” Let's see ow long will the democracy that we modern humans cherish and that grants us a relatively peaceful life continue to thrive before it begins to decay.
@pikachue602 Жыл бұрын
Agreed
@muk4609 Жыл бұрын
Very True
@Aeyo Жыл бұрын
It has started decaying of democracy that is.
@samhunt6300 Жыл бұрын
The Great Depression of the 1930s, characterized by economic hardship and widespread unemployment, did not necessarily lead to the emergence of universally strong individuals. Instead, it spurred a diverse range of responses, from resilience and innovation to despair and hardship. Powerful leaders or figures in history haven't always resulted in periods of prosperity and peace. For instance, the strong leaders who led their nations into World War I and World War II were responsible for immense suffering and destruction, rather than good times. Periods of prosperity and economic growth, such as the Roaring Twenties in the United States, did not uniformly produce weak individuals. Many accomplished and resilient individuals emerged during prosperous times, contributing to cultural, scientific, and technological advancements.
@AdityaRaj-ru9br3 күн бұрын
Remember things a guy Chankya single handedly destroyed Nanada Empire which Alexander couldn't conquer because of small army secondly Ashoka was in real sense the great he was first in world to build hospital for Animals and wells and spread peace although no ruler in history hasn't killed innocent lives
@meghashyamkata3138 Жыл бұрын
Can you make a video of chola Empire of India
@reddragon100 Жыл бұрын
Great video ❤ but just one correction. Chanakya meet chandragupta in Magadha after he was insulted by Nanda king for his ugly looks & manners while leaving & on the run, he saw a boy playing game of 'kingship' outside the palace & took him away to Taxila for further studies. He didnt meet him as adult in taxila. No source says such things.
@todyrodgers1169 Жыл бұрын
Never heard of it despite being a history nerd, why such things aren't even discussed in the history books amazes me.
@howiehall4622 Жыл бұрын
Same here. I did not know that much of what is now India had been united that far in the past. Always love learning new things.
@ImperialDiecast Жыл бұрын
not knowing about ashoka and the mauryas is like not knowing about the ming and tang dynasty
@howiehall4622 Жыл бұрын
@@ImperialDiecast Ah yes! The Ming Dynasty was formed by that guy from Flash Gordon and the Tang Dynasty is famous for inventing the powdered orange drink that the astronauts like. Gosh I love history!
@abhishekgiri6172 Жыл бұрын
@@howiehall4622check about the Gupta Empire their ruling period is called Golden time of India
@vikram_shahi Жыл бұрын
The western history book writers doesn’t bother to talk about
@lerneanlion Жыл бұрын
And eventually, the Mughal Empire suffered the same fate after Padishah Aurangzeb passed away. Am I correct with this?
@Rio-Arya Жыл бұрын
He was the first reason for death of mughals he was cruel to his non Muslim subjects which lead to rise in Rebellions most famously the marathas with whom he wasted his life fighting
@lerneanlion Жыл бұрын
@@Rio-Arya Correction: He executed all rebels regardless of their religions.
@Rio-Arya Жыл бұрын
@@lerneanlion yeah buy he was cruel to non muslims. It's a fact
@lerneanlion Жыл бұрын
@@Rio-Arya He needed to appease the ulama who put him on the Peacock Throne. They can put him there. They can also overthrown him. I know that it's not even a good excuse but if your supporters gained nothing in supporting your cause, you can expected them to turn on you. And unlike the rebellions that happened somewhere else, you might ended up becoming a prisoner in your own home because they always stayed close to you, literally.
@user-vy5uy9fo8p Жыл бұрын
@@lerneanlionaurangzeb pretty much sealed the fate for mughals, disastrous campaigns against marathas, rajput rebellions, jaat and sikh rebellions. Pretty much ended it within 50 years.
@rajsarkar3865 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for making Indian's first & largest empire ' The Great Mauryan Empire ' ❤ love from india
@ashwindeva711111 ай бұрын
They have waged war on tamil kings called 3 vendhars(chera chola and pandyas)but faced a defeat such that ashoka didnt dare to march towards them. He is intelligent to maintain friendship with them.Please put video on The PANDYAS the having the pride of the longest ruled kingdom in the world.
@hopeundertheblacksun11 ай бұрын
Lol what? Southern kings accepted Ashoka as their suzerain. They were servants to Ashoka
@ashwindeva711111 ай бұрын
@@hopeundertheblacksun really you kid, can you show a king who praised his slave in any of his inscription.🤣🤣🤣 pure North Indian mindset hence proved. Do you think Is ashok had no guts to call them as slave instead of friend in his inscription . As a follower of chanakya they will.not accept as weaker one as friend only a person more power them if you not read it go and read it first.
@hopeundertheblacksun11 ай бұрын
@@ashwindeva7111 bro stop smoking weed. He describes them as friendly vassals in his edicts have you even read them?
@hopeundertheblacksun11 ай бұрын
@@ashwindeva7111 so south indian little kingdoms had more power than the entire Indian subcontinent? Mfw
@ashwindeva711111 ай бұрын
@@hopeundertheblacksun yes it's not about the count and number it's all about determination and love for country bro. Don't you have heard about a indian soldier defended 300 chinese soldiers. Its all about strategy. If you have doubt when malikafur looted indian. His poet has specifically mentioned about the loot that they carried treasure of 6000 elephants and more from pandya kingdom alone thousand of horses full of treasure i am talking here only on notes from other kingdoms not fro our own inscriptionand poet because you will say it as myth right🤣🤣. At period of raja raja, they had 60000 elephants 2lakh cavalry and 3 lakh standing army hence they shifted capital to place called gangaikonda cholapuram. There is saying that cholas navy makes the bay of Bengal to look like lake that too from foreign author.
@camilofernando7952 Жыл бұрын
I love how Tamil Nadu and Kerala in the South, have still maintained their independence and unique cultural identity !
@akhripasta2670 Жыл бұрын
Were Ally of Maurya like Kamrupa
@greaterbharat4175 Жыл бұрын
False ,chola themselves declared they are north people related to aryavart Not to mention Brahmin dynasty is arya chakravartin Dynasty was also ruled by Brahmin ( and all Brahmins linages origin from north India) North has influenced very much
@cameronpillay805011 ай бұрын
@@greaterbharat4175🤮🔫
@starrynight434518 ай бұрын
Because there was no civilization there
@cameronpillay80508 ай бұрын
@@starrynight43451no wonder every one hates north indian poojeets ..
@LaylaHatun-q4n Жыл бұрын
Chandragupta Maurya defeated all satraps of Alexander in India and his former General Seleucus and also made a marital pact with him. He was one of the greatest emperors of India and yeah its Chanakya not Chanukya 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@عليياسر-ذ5ب Жыл бұрын
Scythians: Ha-ha-ha. We, the descendants of Ashoka, will defeat this person
@akhripasta2670 Жыл бұрын
@@عليياسر-ذ5بCopium No European civilisation back then except Greek.
@History_Teller125011 ай бұрын
The only Greek that Chandragupta Maurya fought is Seleucus I Nicator...
@eLeft66 ай бұрын
Seleukus had more important wars to fight to the west. He didn't commit to the war and agreed to give up some eastern teritorries for an alliance. At the end the alliance paid off, since Maurya sent him 500 war elephants which he used to win battles against the other Greeks to the west.
@rowlattgamer3355 Жыл бұрын
Started by a brahmin and ended by a brahmin. What an irony
@debasishgoswami9896 Жыл бұрын
💀💀
@None2o Жыл бұрын
🤣
@r.49968 ай бұрын
Stop this hate bro
@doki1146 Жыл бұрын
Will there be a video about Mughal Empire and Chola Empire 😊
@rationalsamrat3247 Жыл бұрын
Please make a video about King Shivaji and King Sri Krishna devaraya aswell . I wish you could make them in mini series .
@fjordsiekl1492 Жыл бұрын
Make more videos on Indian history please.
@maddogbasil Жыл бұрын
*Historia can you make a video on the Horn of Africa*
@dhilkathiravan Жыл бұрын
Those Beautiful TAMIL LANDS :)
@sahilsingh6048 Жыл бұрын
Ewww
@171_indranildutta66 ай бұрын
Lol Dravidian sthu
@16tanphat88 Жыл бұрын
Can you make Why mughal empire collapse please
@linguaLatinae Жыл бұрын
And Vijayanagara
@TheChosen2030 Жыл бұрын
They collapsed, because of infighting
@doki1146 Жыл бұрын
@@TheChosen2030and the Sultan was a joke when the Persian attack
@prasanth2601 Жыл бұрын
Stretching the empire into South resulting in draining of resources. Internal struggle like communal violence, Puppet states not paying taxes, Rise of new empires in deccan, Punjab along with durrani invasion from afghanistan and ultimately succumbed to Great British Empire.
@tootsie40 Жыл бұрын
They collapsed cuz they were mozi fucks son
@சண்முகபிரியன்-வ8ஞ Жыл бұрын
Pls make a about legendary cholas ❤
@sathishamethshan9152 Жыл бұрын
This great man's son mihindhu and daughter sanghamiththa bought Buddhism to sri lanka and people with various field experts becoming spiritual and technological bridge that lead a golden era to sri lanka ❤❤🔥🙏
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
I have heard the people of srilanka have origins from ancient Kalinga ? Is that true ? And one philipines guy told me on internet that Kalinga was very popular in South Asia and SEA , like they call the name Kaleng
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
And there were islands like lankadweep , sumatradweep, jambudweep etc interconnected through trade and all
@debodatta739811 ай бұрын
You are a liar, Prince Vijaya was a Buddhist before Ashoka was even born and he and his followers brought Buddhism to Sri Lanka
@saikrishnak8631 Жыл бұрын
So, basically Ashoka = future Hadrian ??? both of their great grandsons were trash. but the thing is Rome was saved by Septimius severus, Aurelian and Diocletian while the mauryans werent.
@runajain5773 Жыл бұрын
And before romen were republic whereas mauryan monarchy
@georgiopasca2720 Жыл бұрын
You can't compare both because rome has many Dynasties and Maurya itself a dynasty you can compare subcontinent though
@riderchallenge4250 Жыл бұрын
most of Indian and Chinere empires were family dominated and had one family rule except some like delhi and vijaynagara@@georgiopasca2720
@user-vy5uy9fo8p Жыл бұрын
The equivalent of Rome is not Maurya but Pataliputra. The supremacy of Pataliputra ended with the Guptas.
@user-vy5uy9fo8p Жыл бұрын
@@georgiopasca2720Not the subcontinent but Pataliputra starting from Haryanka dynasty(3rd dynasty) to the imperial Gupta would be a better fit to Rome.
@ariapinandita9240 Жыл бұрын
Next... Yunan civilization in Indochina... After the fall of the Saka dynasty in India/Jambudwipa, our ancestors (Saka-Yavana, Malaya-Kamboja-Champa) moved to the Yunan region in Indochina (Mekong-Irrawaddy river)... After that, they moved to the Sunda Islands (Saptadwipa)... 1. Saka-Yavana = Sunda-Javanese/Sunda-Jawa 2. Malaya-Kamboja-Champa = Melayu/Malay The year when Aji Saka/Ajivaka arrived at the island of Java commemorates as the 1st Saka year... Now, this calendar system is still used today on the island of Java Indonesia (hybrid with the Hijriyah calendar/Sultan Mataram calendar/Penanggalan Jawa/Javanese calendar) together with aksara Aji Saka/Hanacaraka/Javanese script... It is believed that Aji Saka/Ajivaka is our unifying figure, born in Kali Serayu region/Bumi Majeti and introduced aksara Hanacaraka (Javanese script), Saka calendar, and agama Tirta...
@ariapinandita9240 Жыл бұрын
Muria-Keling war/Maurya-Kalingga war causing massive migration of the people of Keling/Kalingga to the island of Java. Furthermore, migrants and natives built a kingdom together with the name Medang Keling/Medang Kalingga which was later called the Mataram kingdom... Yups... This happened after the era of the Sunda-Galuh kingdom in West Java...
@saanjanibaar8085 Жыл бұрын
Boring made-up story..
@CultfitDelhiNCR Жыл бұрын
To tell you the truth ...sakas didn't conquer India .there were thousands of kingdoms in india and they could barely scratch or dominate a few because some native kings were there friends .
@ariapinandita9240 Жыл бұрын
@@CultfitDelhiNCR Thank you brother about the information... Btw, can you tell me about Aji Saka/Ajiwaka/Ajivaka (our unifying figure in Indonesia) and whereabout Kali Serayu river/Bumi Majeti? The story I described above is only a folk tale in the Sunda region (West Java, Indonesia) which has not been proven by archaeological evidence. Especially after the fall of the Malay Champa dynasty because they lost the war against Dai Viet... Regarding the place names Kali Serayu/Bumi Majeti, Kosambi, Pallawa, etc we also don't know whether there really are such place names or are they just legends... Thanks 🙏
@ariapinandita9240 Жыл бұрын
The sources I use are purwa/purwacarita books, wayang golek Sunda and stories from word of mouth (folklore)... We also don't know whether Aji Saka/Ajiwaka/Ajivaka (va = wa in Sanskrit) existed or was just a legendary figure...
@hariprasadreddy66287 ай бұрын
can you make a similar video on SathaVahana Dynasty?
@aanchaallllllll Жыл бұрын
0:45: 🔍 The Indian subcontinent in the early centuries BC was a land of empires, with the Nanda Empire being a prominent one. 3:28: 📚 The Maurya Empire expanded its territory under the reign of Bindusara and his son Ashoka, who faced challenges but eventually stabilized the empire and focused on annexing the territory of Kalinga. Recap by Tammy AI
@itsmemasud4 ай бұрын
Never seen such a detailed video about Great Maurya empire
@KrishnkantSingh-qk8tk3 ай бұрын
There are many other already on youtube
@vkk2040 Жыл бұрын
Its a myth (and ancient propaganda) that he converted to Buddhism after being remorseful of war. He kept fighting wars after accepting Buddha Also, There was not any distinction between what is Hindu and Buddhist. Both had same gods too. Its more so a case of Buddhist teachers spreading a myth for their own
@tertmade9769 Жыл бұрын
I think of this as well, also their were other older religions, they were minorities during Ashoka's reign, such as Brahmins, Ajivikas, Sramanas, and Jains Even their were the Mlecchas, basically heretical outsiders
@vkk2040 Жыл бұрын
@@tertmade9769 See it's hard to determine whether Buddhism was the majority Buddhists Hindus and Jains worshipped and included in their legends the same gods. Many early Buddhist were Brahmins and Buddhist kingdoms were often accompanied by Hindu law as such matters were not written concisely and those written were contradictory and unhelpful. Many kings even used only Brahmins for coronation and priestly duties. All people maybe had accepted Buddha as another deity/learned man. But they had also at same time not left other things including respect for Vedas despite Buddhism being atheistic Only in modern world are things expected to be very well defined
@ananthapadmanabhan6340 Жыл бұрын
But they functioned in two separate ways.
@vkk2040 Жыл бұрын
@@ananthapadmanabhan6340 Now when they're well defined Earlier, in lives of normal life, brahminical laws and customs were dominant, and also Buddha was accepted as a learned man No Buddhist king in India ever patronised only distinctly Buddhist artists and monks. People just lived and carried out worship, rituals and festivals Same gods were present in Hindoo and Buddhist legends,thus you praying to a God couldn't even set you apart into two. Also highly doubt that people were exactly sure which legend about a God was Hindu and which one was Buddhist
@ananthapadmanabhan6340 Жыл бұрын
@@vkk2040 Most sects in Hinduism is mainly under Brahmin Orthodoxy, whereas Buddhism and Jainism doesn't have it
@Hari-pi2tx Жыл бұрын
Please make a video on Satavahana Dynasty
@emperor4770 Жыл бұрын
Its Cha-na-kya...not cha-nu-kya Pronounce correctly.
@iii09888 ай бұрын
It's Cha-nak-ya
@x0lopossum Жыл бұрын
0:21Dhana Nanda sounds like an infamous name. 2:45 Chandragupta's trait in Civ 6.
@reddragon100 Жыл бұрын
Chandragupta was born as poor boy in pataliputra in Nanda empire and become emperor of same empire. From poor boy roaming outside of nanda palace to emperor. Rag to riches
@satyaambler Жыл бұрын
Dhana nanda is a greedy, moneyminded & debauched emperor.
@Cool-zc9ps Жыл бұрын
PS. Seleucus waged war. Chandragupta fought, defended, won and conquered.
@History_Teller125011 ай бұрын
There is a common misconception about Seleucus I Nicator. This misconception is that many people think he invaded India. This is simply not true. After Alexander III of Macedon died, his generals divided his empire between them. One of those generals was Seleucus I Nicator, he recieved all of modern-day Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. A few years later, Chandragupta Maurya, the founder and first emperor of the Mauryan Empire, attacked the Seleucid Empire to re-capture the Indian lands that Alexander III of Macedon had conquered. After a war known as the Seleucid-Mauryan War that lasted 2 years, Chandragupta Maurya won and re-conquered those lands. In the subsequent peace treaty, Seleucus I Nicator recognised the Mauryan right over those lands and in exchange recieved 500 war elephants as compensation for the loss of those lands. After the war, the 2 sides then became allies by marriage. Berenice, Seleucus I Nicator's daughter, married Bindusara, Chandragupta Maurya's son. So you see, it wasn't Seleucus I Nicator who attacked the Mauryan Empire, it was Chandragupta Maurya who attacked the Seleucid Empire...
@skysedgeproductions6170 Жыл бұрын
Budhism ruined Mauryan Empire. The kings turned cowards. Later Budhism led to fall of Afghanistan Pakistan to islam and Tibet to China.
@playhouse5732 Жыл бұрын
Could you please make a video on the rise and fall of chola empire
@KaalRig8 ай бұрын
There is some big reason why foreigners knowingly pronounce Bhartiya(Indian) names wrong
@amritYADAV5666 Жыл бұрын
I belong to Patliputra ,Bihar😍,
@kanishkkumar5431 Жыл бұрын
I belong to ang desh (malinipur😉
@kanishkkumar5431 Жыл бұрын
Aao kabhi haveli pe ..janeman😆 krte h kuch
@_natureisgod Жыл бұрын
Kalinga kingdom please make a video on it❤
@sachithaillangage3168 Жыл бұрын
Great Ashoka king destroyed alexander's empire and conquered India into one kingdom. After that, he converted to Buddhism and spread around the world. He saves India. What a great king.
@cameronpillay8050 Жыл бұрын
He couldn't conquer the Tamils 😂 do yr research before you enbarass yourself
@marcus.the.younger11 ай бұрын
He didnt destroy Alexanders army It was a stalemate because of the internal conflict between his army Alexanders army composed of people from different race, ethinicity and religion
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
@@cameronpillay8050 they were vassals
@cameronpillay805011 ай бұрын
@@Kmr571-l8yproof ? Typical cringe north indian 😂
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
@@cameronpillay8050 yo dude , I am not from north or your Hindi belt I'm from the region of former Kalinga 💀 The same kingdom who denied Ashoka for free trade and had a war and paid a big toll. And I don't side with Ashoka because few years later another king kharvela brought the glory back to Kalinga . But you gotta admit he was a powerful man and Tamil was his vassals .
@skull99crusher16 Жыл бұрын
Can you please make a series on rise and fall of maratha empire please
@anuragtumane5227 Жыл бұрын
It is shown that the Mauryan empire has been made so vast by Ashoka, after Chandragupta Maurya.
@patkub3214 Жыл бұрын
I like how regardless of size, religion, origin, population or timeline... No Indian Empire has conquered most Southern part of Indian Continent for some reason or another.
@realchad7200 Жыл бұрын
Can you say the reason
@comradebear9477 Жыл бұрын
Everyone did. But Lemurians go REEEE if someone says this so people just avoid controversy
@cameronpillay8050 Жыл бұрын
#tamiltigers 🐅
@bilimsanatduzen2074 Жыл бұрын
Great understanding thanks alot
@kirtigupta9753 Жыл бұрын
Chanakya was the greatest war tactician, economist, public administrator, international foreign policy expert the ancient world has seen. Every economist and foreign policy expert must read the treatise " Chanakya Neeti"
@vktlogistics4193 Жыл бұрын
Would really love to see a video about satavahanas
@cameronpillay8050 Жыл бұрын
Would really appreciate a series on the Cholas. ❤
@DRAGON_BBX Жыл бұрын
Pushyamitra Shunga 🗿
@strategicfops7896 Жыл бұрын
we need a video on Chola empire
@derpydude2739 Жыл бұрын
I was just watching the Extra History Buddhism video where they talked about the Maurya Empire too. Weird. 😂
@allahkiammikogandmarekutta6154 Жыл бұрын
Did you hear about Magasthenes the Greak envoy of Selucus sent to Chandragupta's court at the capital of Patliputra by Selucus. Megasthenes wrote in his book "Indica" that Patliputra is the greatest city in the world.
@mint8648 Жыл бұрын
Yes he also said there was a rigid caste system despite no evidence of endogamy until the Guptas
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
Waiting for History of India Part 2👀
@terrorist... Жыл бұрын
Turk Brother ❤
@Anonymous-y5i6 күн бұрын
265 BC- ASHOKA CONVERTED TO BUDDHISM 261 BC- Kalinga war happened... 4years after converted to Buddhism Kalinga war happened
@howiehall4622 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting topic. I don't know a lot about the history of India (other than modern history) and it is cool to learn something new! I am wondering about Ashoka. Did he wield an orange lightsaber?
@FromPlanetZX Жыл бұрын
He inherited most of the empire which his grandfather had conquered.
@Sikandar55555 Жыл бұрын
King Ashok did not turned Buddhist after Kalinga war. But he was already a Buddhist practitioner before he went to annex Kalinga modern day orrisa state
@hopeundertheblacksun Жыл бұрын
Emperor Ashok*
@ashrithrao06 Жыл бұрын
Reason of Mauryan decline: Ashoka was the biggest reason. He left his Kshatriya dharma and duties of a warrior and lived like a monk for his entire life and this was continued by his successors. It took one Chanakya to build the whole empire but his teachings were forgotten by his own disciple’s successors. The idea of Chanakya was to create a King who can unite the entire Subcontinent of Indian Culture and protect it from outsiders. And Ashoka’s successors failed in it. The Indo-Greeks were very much becoming stronger through the local support and the Nomad Scythian (Shaka) raids were becoming more frequent. Kingdoms like Satavahana in the south declared independence and were also becoming more stronger. Basically the entire Mauryan kingdom was surrounded by enemies in all directions, it has to do with Ashoka’s peaceful policies. Ashoka was a ruthless leader who crushed every rebellion in Mauryan empire through lots of blood. His peaceful policies made the empire militarily weaker. At the end, the last Mauryan ruler wanted to disintegrate the army when the invasion of enemy was highly possible at any time. Pushyamitra Shunga the General of the Army was loyal to the crown but couldn’t see the Mighty Magadh Empire losing to someone militarily, so Shunga had the support of the Ministers and overthrew the Mauryan king and established the Shunga Empire which succeeded to protect the Magadh Empire from any Foreign Invaders from the West & North-West. Interestingly the people of Magadh Empire hugely supported the Shunga Rebellion against the Mauryan empire as they know the enemies at the border was waiting to strike at any time. So, Ashoka’s peaceful policies led to the destruction of the greatest empire ever founded by the Greatest Guru of India. No followed Chanakya’s principles after Bindusara. Edit:- Pushyamitra Shunga beheaded the last Mauryan Emperor Brihadratha when Magadh was attacked by Yavanas and a long siege of Magadh was going on by Yavanas. Brihadratha a non violence preacher constantly interfered in the strategies of his General Shunga and his soldiers. This led to killing of the king because the Empire was under siege of the Enemy and your own king is making your soldiers lose.
@hopeundertheblacksun11 ай бұрын
Ashoka was a brilliant ruler but yes his peaceful policies led to incompetent successors who destroyed the empire
@गांडीवधारी8 ай бұрын
If Ashoka would not leave his Kshatriya dharma then we would be the super power in Asia , Middle East until the Constantinople
@ziscode19814 ай бұрын
@@गांडीवधारी my thought exactly would have been cool af
@NikSha-dc2if Жыл бұрын
Pushpmitra Singha was a patriot and fortunately he saved the country from western invaders ...
@pacewalk7396 Жыл бұрын
He wasa traitor
@akashhazarika2782 Жыл бұрын
Ashok was never the Great it was the buddhist literature that made him the great. Only if realised the real dream Guru Chanakya and his Grandfather Chandragupta, the vision of an Undivided India. Chanakya/Kautilya always knew how a divided India would make it easy for foreign invaders from the northwest to prey upon a vulnerable India, and which actually can be witnessed withon the next 1000 years with the muslims, he predicted that back whenit was greeks back then. Alas, only because of Ashoka it all fell. Akhand Bharat became a lie , a great reason is “Ashoka the Great”
@pacewalk7396 Жыл бұрын
Only a baztsrd will say something like this about Ashoka the great
@akashhazarika2782 Жыл бұрын
@@pacewalk7396 ashoka is the reason why india is into pieces...and only a bastard will disagree
@debodatta739811 ай бұрын
You are a liar, Prince Vijaya was a Buddhist before Ashoka was even born and he and his followers brought Buddhism to Sri Lanka
@MelkorTolkien Жыл бұрын
There's a lot of cool stuff about Ashoka, some urban Legends and myths too. But that would need its own video.
@FOOTBALLSHORTSHD_7 Жыл бұрын
Pls can you make a video about The Chola Empire❤
@brokenbridge6316 Жыл бұрын
nice video
@jattmoosewala83 Жыл бұрын
Chanakya is a mythical character created by "mudrarakhshas" book published under the name of vishakhadutt, after the 700 years of chandrangupta. A greek scholer called magasthenease in chandragupta's court wrote a book called "indica" and didn't mentioned about Chanakya. It is usual brahmical trick to take over the credit of warriors. Moreover, Chandragupta maurya was a jainist.
@ruyam21 Жыл бұрын
Yes he did. He mentioned Chanakya as Kautilya the same way he mentioned Chandragupta as Sandrakottos and also mentioned his book Arthashastra.
@jattmoosewala83 Жыл бұрын
@@ruyam21 lol
@Vrsan-rw5ph Жыл бұрын
No he is not fictional
@vanshbeniwal1662 Жыл бұрын
Don't spread fake information He is a globally accepted figure by historians
@vanshbeniwal1662 Жыл бұрын
Don't spread propoganda The indica book written by Greek historian megasthenes is lost We were only able to recover a part written by other historians from his book He might be mentioned in the part which is lost
@SJking-gk4go Жыл бұрын
Chandra gupta mauriya, and his dynasty eventually failed, for reasons that were deliberately hidden at that time. He being a ruler ordered buddist monks, to rearrange rig veda, and write mahabharat and puranas, suppressed buddism and jainism to promote vedic culture. He used the same tactics that the romans used to bring all tribal religions under one umbrella. Basically convert to have a larger empire. He was responsible for introducing so called *class system * he even took buddist teaching and incorporated into the b.gita.etc. His second wife was a child bride of greek descent which explains the greek stories hidden in hindoo books. Before anyone trying to debate me and defend a character like him do research first. He was an very dangerous man.
@Kmr571-l8y11 ай бұрын
Kalinga s know how dangerous he was ... And nowadays his myths are bunked like he was already a Buddhist and many more
@debodatta739811 ай бұрын
You are a liar, Prince Vijaya was a Buddhist before Ashoka was even born and he and his followers brought Buddhism to Sri Lanka
@srikanthbethi8807 Жыл бұрын
Indian ruler Ashoka realized the importance of peace & development 2100 years ahead of rest of the world. World learned lesson only after World War II. Early enlightenment of Ashoka & spreading of Buddhism is the main reason for India falling to Muslims & Western powers a thousand years later. As entire subcontinent was relatively peaceful for thousand years which didn’t invest heavily in upgrading military capabilities.
@عليياسر-ذ5ب Жыл бұрын
Ashoka: Where is peace, O servant? I was helping the caste system and waging wars between them, and this is peace. I am doing this because I am one of the Scythians, and these are an invading people.
@pacewalk7396 Жыл бұрын
Muslim invasion came 1000 years after Ashoka. Kuchvi
@srroyalrevolt7566 Жыл бұрын
Hello Knowledgia please rectify your video. Kalinga war happened around 261 BC. Ashoka converted to Buddhism 2 years prior the Kalinga war. Check on Charles Allen book on Ashoka he clearly mentions his conversion predated Kalinga War.
@santoshdevanallikar7480 Жыл бұрын
Ashoka was already Buddhist before he invaded Kalinga. The narrative thst he became Buddhist due to his remorse at Kalinga is a fake narrative
@kanishkkumar5431 Жыл бұрын
Just like this narrative of recent bjp propaganda. ... Now budhhist became wrong to u. ......going in islamic direction
@prakashamit201111 ай бұрын
Chandragupta Maurya was born in Patilputra. Not in present day Afghanistan as this video suggests. And Buddhism is just another sub-route of Hinduism. Just like many, you can choose to worship budha or Ganesha or shiva or Krishna etc etc
@atharva70693 ай бұрын
Just a minor correction, Aria (herat) was ceded to the mauryan empire of India by seleucus nicator in the end of Seleucid-Mauryan wars, your map doesn't have that.