Kodak i60 35mm Camera - Overview and Loading

[@danielcoburn7696]

😅 funniest camera review I’ve watched on KZbin

[@honainseoul]

This video saved me using my first camera haha thanks for all the info!

[@kencarnley7101]

I purchased one of these re loadable plastic cameras. Mine is labeled AGFA. Included a pouch to carry it in. Works as well as a disposable camera.

[@Cynthiadollful]

thx！！！almost buy the 400 one

[@StorytimeAdventures-jl9wv]

Amazing

[@jcravath]

Hi! great video - would 400 iso be ok if i was shooting at the break of day? just before sunlight ..

[@aengusmacnaughton1375]

Nubs -- not just a critical part of any plastic camera, but a great name for a pet Gila monster!!!

[@paulaoteromompean2464]

If we compare this camera with the kodak m38, which one would be better to buy?

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

Photo quality is the same. Choose the camera that looks best to you.

[@ultraelectromagneticburniq439]

What's the best option between these three: * KODAK Film Camera M35 / M38 * Kodak Ultra F9 Reusable Film Camera * Kodak I60 Reusable Film Camera Thanks!

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

All deliver similar images in quality, so, in my opinion, pick the one that is most attractive to you! - Mike

[@fudenosuketombow7668]

Does the i60 logo and the silver grid square design in front of the camera made out of sticker or is it printed on the camera itself?

[@paimonsaidEHE]

should i buy this or ultra f9? or they have the same quality?

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

Quality will be the same.

[@pakhrimanarul]

Ektar m35 vs i60 what u prever

[@TPSKurochi]

What film would you recommend for this one guys? Ive used Gold 200 and Porta 400, both worked okay, but not very good indoor without flash. Would using a 100 ISO be best? Cheers

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

Gold 200 or ColorPlus 200 would be great!

[@gabrielatiquet6005]

can i use 35mm film for this cam?

[@frankdiscussion2069]

yes

[@LLambert-g6v]

That little number aint changing, what now?

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

The frame counters break very easily. You can still use the camera but will have to manually keep track of how many frames you have shot. :(

[@LLambert-g6v]

@@FilmPhotographyProject I think it may have had something to do with the way the film was loaded. I know the film was moving because the rewind dial was turning. I'm so new at this!

[@camilam1997]

I have the same problem! And I just bought it yesterday. Now, when I took a photo I realized that the number didn't change :(

[@camilam1997]

@@FilmPhotographyProject unfortunately, I opened to see the film and I rewind it... is there any problem if I still use it?

[@1987productions]

woohoo!

[@TheStockwell]

Just a question: why do so many otherwise great photographic channels bother to review cheap plastic cameras? By "review," I mean: list all the specs without showing sample images - or saying whether the plastic contraption is worth paying money for. Is it a legal obligation? 🤔

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

Do not know. Can't speak for the "otherwise great photographic channels" Have you found any "otherwise great photographic channels"? (LOL - Mike)

[@toonman361]

I live near Rochester, NY and see the Kodak building frequently. I am not sure why the persist in releasing new products that are regressive and inferior in quality to their previous products. Kodak has become the de-facto standard in how NOT to operate a business. This camera is technically no better than one you can purchase at a dollar store. I actually have. Developing film is around $10 a roll + tax. It would be better buying the Fuji disposable where you mail in the whole camera. Why, just why waste R&D money on such a nothingburger product?

[@aengusmacnaughton1375]

The plastic-fantastic Kodak cameras released over the last few years only have the Kodak name on them. They are products from China (not slamming China) -- most of them from the Reto company (if you look you will find identical cameras with the Reto name and other names). So Kodak has wasted nothing more than a lawyer's time to sign a licensing agreement to use the Kodak name on these cameras, and hopefully Kodak gets a penny or two everytime one is sold. I actually have the H35 half-frame camera, and it is fun to use (like an old box camera -- no thinking required!). I do have to say that the plastic, fixed-focus lenses of the Reto-made cameras produce images a lot better than the plastic-fantastic cameras of 20+ years ago (think the "Time" camera and similar)....

[@toonman361]

@@aengusmacnaughton1375 Thanks for your personal experience. I like the idea of photo imperfection. Perfection is all to easy to achieve in modern technology. But of all people to waste their time on this junk, why Kodak? They are the embodiment of poor judgement, well, them and Polaroid.

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

The Kodak plastics are made by Sino-Promise who has licensed the Kodak name. Check out this confusing website - www.kodak.com/en/consumer/product/cameras/film/i60 - Main page reads copyright Eastman Kodak but the click tru ( kodak.meta-is.com/kodaklicensingproducts/contactus ) reads Meta Imaging Solutions.

[@kencarnley7101]

Think these were all made by one company and made in China. They come in different camera brand labels. Mine is an AGFA. It is a disposable camera that you can re load which makes sense to me.

[@michael_fassbender]

is the lens plastic?

[@FilmPhotographyProject]

Yes, it is.