Scientific Proof of GOD

  Рет қаралды 1,289

Ziv Ritchie

Ziv Ritchie

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 12
@savtamarlene
@savtamarlene Ай бұрын
Dr Gerald Schroeder who has a PhD in Geology and another in Physics and who is a ba’al t’shuva (one who repents and observes Torah mitzvot) has lectured extensively and written many books on the subjects for several decades.
@koshermedia
@koshermedia Ай бұрын
He has talked about things that may seem similar if you dont read my entire book or watch the entire video on you tube. But actually this is an entirely differnt class of proof. No one has discovered this before.
@seanvandiijk2889
@seanvandiijk2889 Ай бұрын
@@koshermedia Baruch HaShem!!
@seanvandiijk2889
@seanvandiijk2889 Ай бұрын
The scientific proof of G-d it's incredible simple, it's actually ruled in the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics. I'm still working on that super resumed version and I have some draft "papers". I watched a video some time ago sadly I couldn't find it anymore about Entropy, and the example they use is a Rubik's cube that randomness cannot generate life in the same way if someone starts to randomly trying to solve the cube, with each move the entropy increases. One of the scientists who tried to explain entropy from a certainly not believer in G-d perspective is Brian Cox with his example of the sand castle, but he is not taking into account the grains of sand are being re-arranged in a different way when he builds a new structure for the castle, so that classical entropy is not what life is about. Life is Quantum Entropy and there is little to none investigation about that in relation to life.
@davidbrauner2848
@davidbrauner2848 4 ай бұрын
Scientific Proof of God
@yehudiswilks
@yehudiswilks Ай бұрын
This video is fascinating but I can't read so much information so quickly. I would have really enjoyed a voice over along with the video slowed down.
@MarkA-hi9ks
@MarkA-hi9ks 4 ай бұрын
Ziv, does your theory (measurements) take into consideration elliptical orbits? Also, I was wondering if the planetary orbits around the sun correlate to the electron orbits around a nucleus. Thanks.
@koshermedia
@koshermedia 4 ай бұрын
Thanks Mark. I always consistently use the average distance when calculating eliptical orbits using the most simple way to measure average: (largest value + smallest value) / 2 . I did not get into correlating the orbits of the planets and moons to the orbits of the electrons. I really just want to keep this simple to validate the proof of G-d with only a high school level of science knowledge. But a friend of mine, Rabbi Moshe Genuth wrote a more complex book on the ratios of the electrons orbit based on the teachings of Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh in The Torah and Science Series.
@MarkA-hi9ks
@MarkA-hi9ks 4 ай бұрын
You looked at the sun, earth and moon. Did you look at any other elements in our solar system? Would we expect to see this same pattern (1, 3, 4) in other solar systems or other scientific systems/disciplines?
@koshermedia
@koshermedia 4 ай бұрын
Mark, that is very thoughtful. I only checked the sun, moon and earth. It would be interesting to check other planets. Maybe you would like to do that. All of the measurements are available on Wikipedia. I do not know if i would expect the numbers 1, 3, and 4 to appear there also. The sun, moon, and earth have much more importance to people and are mentioned in the Torah Hebrew Bible and kabbalah, and are connected to our calendar, so it is much more expected to show meaning.
@Ashurah1112
@Ashurah1112 4 ай бұрын
How did you calculate probability with a sample size of one? You know the sun, Earth, and moon weren’t always at these precise distances, right? And at some point in the future, they won’t be again…
@koshermedia
@koshermedia 4 ай бұрын
Great question. I use classical probability to proove this. Probability is different than statistics. Probability is always a sample size of one. Statistics is when you would compare many different things and you would need a large sample size. Probability is just a mathematical equation. I measured the distances now. The variance over time is a very very small variance over time. But either way, it does not affect the probability, it just means that you define the question more precisely by saying, "What are the chances that these measurements would be like this (at this time period of a few thousand years)." And you get the answer; 1/1,080,000,000,000,000,000,000
The Judeo-Christian Origins of Modern Science
55:36
Discovery Science
Рет қаралды 60 М.
Cheerleader Transformation That Left Everyone Speechless! #shorts
00:27
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
Каха и дочка
00:28
К-Media
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
How to treat Acne💉
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 108 МЛН
Dr. Jordan Peterson: How to Best Guide Your Life Decisions & Path
3:51:11
Andrew Huberman
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Roger Penrose's Mind-Bending Theory of Reality
1:18:31
Variable Minds with Andréa Morris
Рет қаралды 716 М.
How To Speak Fluently In English About Almost Anything
1:49:55
EnglishAnyone
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
Pre-Algebra Final Exam Review
1:56:08
The Organic Chemistry Tutor
Рет қаралды 251 М.
A Conscious Universe? - Dr Rupert Sheldrake
1:22:44
The Weekend University
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН