Kramnik being Bullied

[@noname-dt6sv]

kramnik's pathetic

[@chesswhizzard]

Stop bullying Kramnik! Let's start a "Kry for Kramnik" fundraiser!!

[@kristof80able]

Ban this compulsive cheater finnaly, In TT today cheated again.

[@surejsingh8099]

what are you kramnik bot or something?

[@MrFootofDavros]

Kind of weird yet another short about this being made today as I just discovered Kramnik was actually correct about the 24 seconds thing (although I'd say 23). Danya said on this podcast he'd shown he could open the engine inside the missing 21 seconds but that is not the case. Given that Danya was given this platform to push a false narrative, it's conceivable to see some "bullying" is indeed taking place.

[@chesswhizzard]

Stop talking tosh otherwise I'll get Kramnik to punch you

[@giulianovelli6774]

The point is that 21 22 24, is kind of a meaningless difference, doing the same thing will always take some second more or less than another. Kramnik saying is 23 not 21 frankly is ridiculous in itself, it takes 21 literally to say Naroditzky lied, but based on this (non-)logic everything can be lie i.e. I say “yesterday I worked all day” and someone tells me I lied because I actually had a 15 minutes break.

[@HarshVTandon]

@@giulianovelli6774 Don't argue with an idiot, he will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience

[@MrFootofDavros]

@@HarshVTandon LOL. The idiot here is ironically parroting something he read elsewhere. Which is basically the situation here with clowns 🤡 who simply repeat without actually looking for themselves.

[@MrFootofDavros]

@@giulianovelli6774 It's not meaningless if, rather than simply seal clapping the Kramnik is mad mantra, you actually look at it. e.g. Do you actually understand why being over 21 seconds is important? You are absolutely correct though that it doesn't prove anything conclusively. However it does prove that the missing 21 seconds were not when he was opening and running an analysis on an engine.