Why We Forget & How to Remember | Charan Ranganath & Jim Kwik

[@JimKwik]

What are your takeaways from this episode? Subscribe so we can stay in touch. ❤ Like this video if it was helpful. 👍

[@bashypitterman1191]

As someone who works in education and special education there are so many things schools should be doing differently based on brain research. When will the education system catch up the the science?

[@sakshikoli4569]

So in simple terms, if you include your emotions in a moment they become memories. Right?

[@salmasanhaji]

It’s always a pleasure to listen to Jim’s videos, I can’t get enough ! Thank you ❤

[@annamariabodzas3744]

This was great! ❤

[@barbaravanderkooi7548]

Thank you for sharing this with me 👍🙏🏻❤️

[@laurapeck8902]

Loved this!

[@kurinovaveronika4837]

Great❤

[@TradeToWinn]

Good information 🎉🎉

[@stanleyklein524]

We forget because that is the natural state of reality (the past vanishes without human effort). Memory is natural selection's trick to offset the natural state of the world. The tired "key" example, is pure fluff that all intro memory teachers (myself included -- until recently) spew absent any serious thought.

[@brianday67]

Joseph Cambell - Follow your bliss!

[@FCCOLLEGEYT]

Please make a video on this topic soon... I always your videos and paid for few online courses. Autism disorder is there a way to over it?????? Other kid I know has it...

[@denisssebuuma4538]

Thanks for your great work Mr. Jim

[@Shi-x2h]

I'm reltively new to your content, i just happen to watch some fasting videos, and some shorts. I notice in a short you were way snappy and smooth in the way you spoke. Why is it that your more slower now?

[@mhescapes]

First like. Wow Demonstration of growth mindset ?

[@24carrotgold8]

The kwik page link doesn't work.

[@jamilacharles5485]

God tree always young just side of rever God bless and protect .

[@brianday67]

Harry Lorraine- Associate the name with a distinctive feature of the face.

[@jayarajraj9207]

How to become like you Jim Kwik

[@SelfProClaimed_Psychic]

👍👍

[@stanleyklein524]

Takeaway: This discussion takes a set of deep mysteries and reduces them to simplistic bromides. This is the state of contemporary academia. We very well may continue making advances in physical issues (at some level), but serious understanding is a no-go in our society. I, along with a (very) few others, introduced the idea that episodic memory enables mental travel into the future. I regret this public demonstration of stupidity and have tried (with no success -- careerism is hard to battle) to point out the logical and empirical foolishness of this idea. Much of our mental reality is future oriented (anticipation is a key for appreciating cause/effect). Episodic memory (or memory, period) is about re-acquaintance with one's past. Other things, (knowledge, belief....) often are oriented (of evolutionary necessity) toward the "now and the next". Memory is "memory" in not being so directed. Conclusion. Too much (far too much) of Academia is sound bite, careerist-driven nonsense (the discussion of Kahenman's (sp?) selves is painfully pure bull shit. No one has a clue what a self consists in. Using it as an explanatory construct is -- generously -- lazy "scholarship"). I like the author. But I find his recounting of Memory tropes discouraging.

[@KevinO-h7m]

Jim Kwik you're based my friend

[@Spock4771]

Any advice for high functioning autism

[@stanleyklein524]

Yes. I have Asperger. I am a leading memory researcher (like being king of an anthill) at the UC. Advice. Ignore this video. It is crammed with weakly warranted, simplistic (and incoherent) sound bite conclusions that, on their face, are embarrassingly stupid. In fact. Ignore psychology if you are looking for scientific knowledge. Psychological knowledge is NOT scientific knowledge. It cannot explain and thus cannot predict (at least, if prediction is to be scientific-like. We cannot -- IN ANY MEMORY STUDY -- predict beyond the non-numeric certitude of "effect present/effect absent" (i.e., no mathematically precise prediction has EVER been offered in a memory study. We do NOT know "how much" a person will remember ("remember", btw, is NOT a synonym for "memory", contra the silly discussion here); rather, our theories (sic -- note that the discussion is exclusively about demonstration. No mention of explanation or prediction. I.e., psychological theory is not scientific theory) enable us to predict only a binary outcome (more vs less; effect present/effect absent). While that is knowledge -- it is NOT scientific knowledge (which has computational specificity, not simple ordinality). It is all rather discouraging and pathetic.

[@SureshNaskar-x1i]

to everyone scrolling, do yourself a favor and read forbidden manifestation by zara blackthorn. thank me later.

[@TB-LivingFree]

DropComment &TapLike 4AIgos

[@krembryle]

For people with ADHD: It's testing yourself.

[@rameshnaidu-el2hq]

stop wasting your time and go read forbidden manifestation by zara blackthorn. your future self will thank you.

[@johnraphaeljimenez5529]

Hi Jim, are you Christian?