SONY FX3 - Still Worth It In 2024?

The Sony FX3 was released almost 3 years ago... so is it still worth it in 2024? Or should you save your money for something else?
Presets, Templates & Free Stuff: beacons.ai/meshna
TOOLS TO MAKE BETTER VIDS:
Artlist - All my music and SFX: bit.ly/Artlist-Meshna
CAMERA GEAR
Main Camera for Photo (Sony A1): geni.us/Mesh-A1
→ Budget Version (Sony a7IV): geni.us/MESH-A7IV
The Camera I Film These Vids With (Sony FX3): geni.us/Mesh-fx3
→ Budget Version (Sony FX30): geni.us/Mesh-FX30
All Time Favorite Lens (24-70): geni.us/2470GMII
→ Older Version: geni.us/Mesh-2470GM
Favorite Wide Angle Lens (16-35): geni.us/1635GMII
→ Older Version: geni.us/Mesh-1635GM
Best Budget Sony Lens: geni.us/Mesh-2070
Favorite Prime Lens (35mm): geni.us/7H2j3
Astro Lens (20mm): geni.us/Mesh-20G
Telephoto Beast (100-400): geni.us/Mesh-100GM
Portrait / BRoll Lens (50mm): geni.us/Mesh-50-14
STUDIO SETUP
Main Key Light: geni.us/Mesh-300B
Cheaper Light Option: geni.us/Mesh-200x
My Studio Microphone (w/ cloud lifter): geni.us/Mesh-SM7B
Travel Tripod: geni.us/Mesh-PDTripod
BUDGET OPTIONS
Budget Sony Mirrorless: geni.us/Mesh-6400
Budget Canon Mirrorless: geni.us/g1SL1
Vlogger Camera: geni.us/Mesh-ZV1
---------------
Note: I earn a small commission from qualifying purchases when you click the links above. This is a no cost to you, but helps me to keep the lights on and making great videos for your eye holes.

[@picjv]

I got my fx3 in 2022 for $3200 and it’s still my favorite camera!!

[@kylemeshna]

That’s a killer deal too

[@WOZCINEMA]

How much should I be planning to pay for a new Sony FX three? Also, which lens would you recommend for an all-around cinematic? I’m shooting cars, car, commercials, exotic muscle cars and I need low light, loving and dynamic range cameras for This and lens.

[@logankahler6802]

The Eric Hartman cutaway had me rolling. I’m so glad I stumbled upon you man. Your content is 👌

[@kylemeshna]

Hahaha cheers fam. Glad you enjoyed that one

[@arminbaldon5347]

Great Video! I'm currently using the GH5 and looking to upgrade to a new full-frame camera. I'm torn between the S5iix and the FX3. Do you think the extra cost for the FX3 is worth it? I’ve watched several footage videos from both cameras on KZbin, especially in the music video genre, and I find Sony’s look much more modern and cinematic.

[@EdsonSantos-qm3wc]

just got a package with a FX3, GM 70 - 200 2.8, Sigma 24-70 2.8, 3 Tough 160 CF, Rode wireless mini- mic set up with Lavs, Two 1tb SSD's, XLR Handle, Sony Mic, 4 Sony batteries, Cage, and a camera bag for $4500. Stoked to see this Vid!

[@kylemeshna]

holy heck. what a haul!

[@ShubhamTotu]

Where in the world you got that pack!

[@woodellproductions]

yeah Im gonna need a link pls!

[@seanpatrickrocks]

Where did you get that package from? 🔥

[@ellingworth95]

Bump

[@jeansebastientlebreton]

Im waiting 😮 very helpfull🎉

[@NZOMV]

great vid!

[@TheBrandonLeeCook]

What is a good hybrid camera that has FX3 features?

[@paulchiu]

Do you know the base ISO or ISOs for HLG2 / H:LG3? thanks.

[@BrandonColePhotography]

It will be better to save your money and wait a few months for the FX3II or A7SIV

[@OmniVisionElite]

Probably won’t see anything until earliest mid 2025…

[@gnsmovies8849]

1:14 AYOO THATS BIG COTTONWOOD sorry got excited.... great video btw

[@hancynunez8038]

I don’t think it sucks for photos at all. In a pinch it gets the job done and does a phenomenal job at getting amazing images even in its current form factor. Out of convenance if I need to shoot both video and photos I just bring the FX3 and it does both well.

[@gonzovi]

Thanks! I’m just starting out to make content for my music. Super helpful!

[@iDealMedley]

My only complain is that it's optimise for only 10bit. Missing features from the cheaper FX30 like variable shutter. Wish it's more flexible

[@Edwin--]

Thanks for the interesting video! I have the feeling that we have plateaued a little when it comes to camera tech, which is a luxury problem. And where it does develop, it is tech that the far majority of users does not need, but where camera companies try really hard to convince us we do. Does the average video shooter need a global sensor, 4K240, 8K60 or 8K120 fps? We don't see any real progress in dynamic range for the past years, which tops out at 15-16 stops for full frame, and 16 bit colour. Raw video is there, but only used by a handful as the file sizes are prohibitively large. We mainly see processor upgrades, but what do most people need beyond sticky autofocus on a stationary or gently moving subject? For those who need superfast, there are specialised cameras (A9III, A1 etc.) I think the A7S3 and FX3 mark the beginning of where the tech currently plateaus, where cameras got really great, and they will be good cameras at least for another 5 years. I don't see 8K taking over anytime soon, especially considering that 95% of all KZbin videos is watched in HD or lower resolutions, and not even 4K. People like to say these days a product is 'long in the tooth', but that is a judgement of age and not performance. And the performance of all these cameras is absolutely still there, even 3 to 4 years later!

[@TravAlligator]

Very well rounded and practical comment, appreciate it! 1) Could you throw some light on APSC vs Full-Frame? In which scenario should one consider APSC over a FF and vice-versa? I mainly shoot videos - travel videos, time lapses, product unboxing, or cooking videos indoors. 2) I've waited too long for the Canon R5 II, Sony A7 SIV or a FX3 II and can't wait any more. I've shortlisted Sony ZVE1, Sony A6700, Sony FX3, Canon R5 and Canon R6 II. I love the Sony's Auto Focus but my eyes love the Canon Colors. I love the Canon's Body (Ergonomics) and Menu system but don't know how good or bad is the Auto Focus compared to Sony. How good or bad is Canon's low light performance over the Sony models I've shortlisted? Long lasting battery when shooting 4K is important to me too.

[@Edwin--]

@@TravAlligator 1) There are 2 main differentiators between Full-frame (FF) and APS-C, low light capabilities and lenses. 

In FF, if you take the Sony A7Siii and FX3, they have excellent performance in low light, due to their high second native ISO of 12,800 if you were to chose those specific cameras. That is not a major difference though, and that difference can be somewhat negated by fact that some sensors are capable of shooting higher resolutions, and sample this down to 4K. This creates additional sharpness, and reduces some of the pixellation/grain caused by high ISO’s. So for a dedicated lowlight camera like an A7Siii and FX3, there is a real difference in low light, but between a FF Sony A7iv and an APS-C FX30 or A6700 which all shoot oversampled 4K that difference is really small.

Secondly, many of the dedicated APS-C are much smaller, while there are now options available that certainly give you a nice shallow depth of field. Think of the Viltrox 75mm f1.2 the Sigma 56mm 1.4, which are really excellent APS-C lenses.
All day in a backpack, that will certainly make a difference.

Do realise that the far majority of R&D of camera companies is with FF and that most products brought out are intended for FF. So FF is where the main future growth is. 2) With respect to your second question. Personally, I find R-mount problematic. The lens choice is limited, and the lenses are really expensive. The Canon R5 is an excellent photo camera, but despite its firmware updates still overheat, and still has a 30 minute recording limit. I would consider this camera unsuitable for your purpose. The Canon R6 II is a much more compelling option, but still with a limited choice of very pricy lenses (not seldom more expensive than the body). Between the ZVE1, A6700 and FX3, my first question would be whether you like to shoot with a viewfinder. If the answer is “yes”, the A7Siii has by far the best viewfinder with 9.4 million dots. A6700 is the best hybrid camera. It has the same sensor as the FX30, and shoots great video, but would also be good at taking photos with the EVF. 
The ZVE1 is a more consumer level camera with an EVF, with a very good sensor that is also used in the A7Siii and the FX3. The body is a bit plastic, it has a single card slot, but it has really nice vlogging features if that is what you are into. This camera will be great in low light, but the 12 megapixel sensor is low resolution for photos (the photos will look great though). In warm weather and during long recording, this camera may overheat. So it’s intended for shorter video clips, like under 30 minutes. The FX3 is an entirely different beast and twice the price. That is a prosumer video camera, with the audio top handle, and a fan, built for all day use. It’s a workhorse camera. If you want to shoot video all day, this the camera to choose. The A7Siii and FX3 set the standard for good AF, and the A6700 and ZVE1 have picked up with that. Be careful that the A7Siii and FX3 do not have Eye-AF for animals in video, which the A7iv and the A6700 do have. So if that’s important to you, chose those. Battery life is not that much of a consideration. Most Sony cameras do about 2 hours on a single charge, but the FX3 and FX30 are certainly a bit more power hungry than the other cameras. To sum up; If you need an EVF: choose the Sony A7iv, A7Siii, A6700 or the Canon R6 II (or (not) the R5). If you shoot a lot of low light; Sony A7Siii, FX3, or ZVE1 If you want to shoot photos next to video; Sony A7iv or A6700 or Canon R6 II If you want unlimited record times and a body to match that; Sony FX3, FX30 and A7Siii For your application, I would actually recommend you the Sony A7iv, with the new Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 Mark II (or Sony 20-70mm f4) lens, and then add a fast prime of your choosing later for lower light shooting. Has an EVF. Gives you great 33 megapixel photos. Is fairly lightweight. Shoots oversampled 4K30, with great sharpness in the images. Low light performance is decent because of the oversampling. Huge lens selection in all price categories. Has the nice connectivity with the mic in the hotshoe (Multi Interface Shoe) Only downside is the 1.5x crop when you shoot 4K60, but then gives same sharpness as FX3 and A7Siii which is still a great image. Furthermore the sensor is a little slower, so for fast action you may see a little bit of rolling shutter. This is not an issue though for static shots, which likely are the main shots in travel videos. For the A6700 the same considerations apply, but body is smaller (a benefit) but less nice in the hand (a bit of a brick). The Sony A7iv is the most versatile camera, and the FF lenses you will buy hold their value well and can be used on other future Sony bodies you may desire. Buying APS-C lenses are less good of an investment, as not all can be used well on FF bodies (the mount is the same, but the image may not cover the full sensor). Hope this helps and please don't bite me if it doesn't 🐊😊

[@TravAlligator]

@@Edwin-- First of all I want to thank you so much for an elaborate response. I learnt a lot from it :-) To answer a few of your questions - My use case is mainly videos about 90% of the times. Rarely do I take pictures or print them so an EVF or high megapixel is not important to me but if it comes as a bonus like the (Sony A6700) I don't mind. I do travel to remote places sometimes and so battery life is important for me. I do carry additional batteries on my current point-and-shoot. So I'm guessing I'll have to do the same no matter if I buy a Sony or a Canon. You see I currently have a Canon G7X II amazing point and shoot. But I badly need a 4K capable camera now for my upcoming travel in the next two weeks. Generally people move to an APSC like the Sony A6700 and then upgrade to a FF later. I could do the same but on second thoughts I'm of the opinion now that why not go for the FF directly since I can afford to buy it. It will save me money later trying to move from APSC body to a FF. Do you agree? I had high hopes from the Canon R5 but if it still over heating and shutting down when shooting a 4K then that's a deal breaker for me. Thanks for raising this flag! And that's another reason I was eagerly waiting for the Canon R5 Mark II since last year but there is no concrete launch date for it yet. Your point about Canon lenses being limited and expensive is correct. But let's say if I buy just 2 lenses like a 24-105mm f/4L and a 50mm f/1.8 will it be sufficient to cover all scenarios that I'm working in? I love Canon's color science, weather sealing, menu system and ergonomics (Sony's tiny body doesn't grip well in my hands). How is the Canon R6 II in terms of 4K videos, in body stabilization, auto-focus and low light performance vs A6700 or an FX3? If Sony had launched an Sony A7S IV or a Sony FX3 II, I would have immediately bought it. The reason I'm skepticle to buy an A7SIII or an FX3 today is because they lack all the goodness of an AI chip which the ZV-E1 or an A6700 have today. This happened to me with the DJI Drone, I bought the DJI Mini 3 Pro and after 2 months they launched the Mini 4 Pro and although Mini 3 Pro is great, I missed the side obstacle avoidance sensors that Mini 4 Pro has. In this scenario sometimes I think of buying the FF ZVE1 for now and start my FF journey. And later whenever FX3 II launches I can sell the ZVE1 body and swtich to FX3 while reusing the FF lenses So to summarize Option 1) FF: Get a Canon R6 Mark II body + 24-105mm f/4L and a 50mm f/1.8 and be done. Option 2) FF: Get a Sony ZVE1 Body (+ a couple of G Master lenses) and later move to a FX3 II Body. Option 3) FF: Buy a Sony A7CII + a couple of G Master lenses and be done. Option 4) Rent or Buy a Sony RX100 VII for my upcoming travel and wait for either Canon R5 Mark II or a Sony FX3 II to launch. Dilemma Dilemma Dilemma! :D

[@Edwin--]

@@TravAlligator You’re welcome. In your messages, I still see a lot of different camera models come by, which vary greatly in handling and price. Perhaps it is worthwhile to visit a store and have a look at the actual cameras, because the handling really matters. Perhaps also set yourself a bit of a budget on what you like to spend for the body and lenses combined. The models and lenses you state vary from a USD 3,000 to USD 9,000 investment, and at every price tier I think may have different expectations. You could also rent one, and see whether you like the camera before making the investment. If you have a Canon G7X II now, any of the suggested cameras will give you a substantial step up from a 1” sensor, at the price of being less pocketable. Most R&D is in full-frame, and there are the most developments, and the lenses hold their value best, so full-frame is in my opinion the best investment longterm. But it would be wrong to dismiss APS-C for its image quality, it’s great, and the lenses are certainly smaller which is an important factor for some. You cannot shoot on what might come out in the future. So I chose cameras on the specs that are available now, and the specs I think I may need in the next years. Shooting up to 4K60p is for most application more than sufficient, and for the top tier bump to 4K120 with full image quality you pay a significant premium in most cameras. Petapixel made a comparison video between the Canon R6 II and the Sony A7iv (and thus A7Cii as well). Suggest to have a look at that one, they do a better job comparing than I ever could in a message. The Sony ZVE1 is a camera that didn’t really win my heart. I think it is intended for people who want to purchase a serious camera, but not take the time to learn how to handle a camera. That to me is typically a camera you’re happy with in the first weeks, and then grow over a bit. I don’t like the small plastic body either, the others are much more solid. I know that quite a few KZbinrs like this camera, but it’s not for me. You can’t beat the price to performance though, as it’s basically the A7Siii-internals at 2/3 of the price. With respect to your options; 1) Besides my comment regarding RF-mount in general, I think the Canon R6 II and the 2 lenses suggested are a really solid and future-proof choice you will get great results with. Very good choice for your application, with a good price to performance ratio. 2) The ZVE1 has on paper higher video specs than the Canon R6 II, but is a very different camera in the hand, and if you like larger bodies you will like the Canon R6 II way more. Of course if you invest in E-mount lenses, you could always switch bodies later, but you can better on focus on what you would enjoy now and in the next few years (and not a fictive camera of the future, as there will always be a next one) 3) The A7CII is small but more solid body than the ZVE1. In specifications, it’s basically an A7iv. Personally I prefer the A7iv, it’s a bit better balanced with the full frame lenses (as the Canon R6 II would be), but many like the A7Cii for it’s smaller size. I like shooting with an EVF, so that’s a factor for me on these type of bodies. 4) I think the Sony RX100 VII does not give you the step up in quality you are looking for, and phone cameras are getting closer to this quality level. So renting one for a holiday could be an option, but I think purchasing one would not be a right choice, if at the same time you’re looking at the much higher end options. It’s a great pocket camera though, but incomparable to the other options in performance and handling.

[@TravAlligator]

@@Edwin-- Another great and detailed response. You are right, I have shortlisted a wide variety and need to bucket them based on the total price I'm willing to spend. Thanks for that approach. I'll also take a look at the comparison videos you have suggested and it will help me narrow down further. Your point about not buying the RX100 VII for an insignificant visual experience is accurate, and I respect that. Thank you so much for all the inputs it's very rare that I come across experts like yourself. Once I arrive at a decision I will let you know soon. Until then see you later Alligator 🐊😁

[@akcine]

Thx!

[@cwoods1294]

Can you explain why you say that the FX30 is limited to APS-C lenses? I understand that it's an APS-C sensor, but you should be able to use FF lenses on it just fine, it's the other way around that doesn't work, at least not without having to crop in

[@cwoods1294]

Nevermind, you mention the crop

[@Edwin--]

The FX30 works well with both APS-C and fullframe lenses, but for fullframe lenses the focal length has to be multiplied by 1.5, and the depth of field equals the aperture times 1.5. But if you use fast lenses, like the Viltrox 27mm and 75mm f1.2, you get the equivalent of a 40mm or 110mm f1.8, and you absolutely can get shallow depth of field. I think the main limitations are with really wide angle lenses, which give more distortion, and the sensor performs a little less good in very low light. But for half the price of an FX3 or A7S3, the FX30 is an absolutely stellar camera.

[@temomorales5074]

I just purchased the FX3. It’s going to be a great option for years to come. As someone who has used the a7iv for video for a while. This is a great option for me.

[@zayrobbs]

I just did the same lol a7iv is great but the fx3 video is just levels above when I look at it

[@temomorales5074]

@@zayrobbs It's pretty incredible how much better the quality is. I'm still somewhat fumbling around to get my settings customized to my liking. One thing I am glad of is not having to worry about over heating.

[@LaloRacer1]

Fire 🔥

[@venerabilee]

Do you think it's possible to expect a sony fx3 II by the end of this year?

[@DrummerTurnedProducer.]

Do you think it's possible to expect him to cover this topic by the end of this video?

[@AntonioDaily]

I’m curious do you need a lens attachment or can you simply just use the camera?

[@lukeknight4621]

Cant shoot without a lens if that's what ur asking

[@AntonioDaily]

@@lukeknight4621 thanks 👌

[@TravAlligator]

Bro 😂

[@beengoated7647]

What about if you shoot sports? Would you recommend the FX3?

[@kylemeshna]

Sports video? Yes. Not sports photos though

[@Edwin--]

Maybe check out the channel "Beyond the Game" here on KZbin, he is a dedicated sports videographer who uses the FX3 as main camera.

[@Lostsoal]

I want to buy fx3 in next 3 months , should i buy or wait 😢???? Or should i buy something else better ? Im new please let me know

[@POVwithRC]

It is the GTX1080ti of cameras. Built way too well and with enough longevity to seriously impact long term profit for Sony because people buy the and keep them much longer than expected. The FX3 will still be in many hands a decade from now, I expect. I also suspect the next lineup of FX bodies will not be as well rounded or long-term useful.

[@kylemeshna]

Good analogy. Similarly, the a7sii had quite a long lifespan, so I could see the next iteration taking over as well

[@vitornovaes2558]

You understand that there is no difference between a 50mm "full frame lens" and a "cropped" 50mm lens on an APS-C sensor, right?

[@compaadres88]

Yes. Not outdated. But I’ll watch anyway

[@gamebreakerfn]

How would you compare the FX3 to the A7Siii? I can't really decide between the two.. :)

[@kylemeshna]

I prefer the FX3, but I also use the A1 as my primary camera for photos. the FX3's photos are effectively the same, but it's not the best form factor and user experience, so if you're a hybrid shooter and this will be your only camera, I might consider the A7SIII. The FX3 is much better suited for pure video shooting due to the ergonomics and "rig-ability". So it just depends on what you need more!

[@gamebreakerfn]

@@kylemeshna Thanks for the response, that will help me a lot 🙏🏼 Probably gonna go for the A7Siii then as it would be my main (and only) camera with me shooting hybrid most of the time :)

[@Edwin--]

To me there are 2 real differences; 1) the A7SIII has an awesome viewfinder, which the FX3 does not have. 2) The FX3 is equipped with a fan and is unlikely to overheat in warm climates. The A7SIII doesn't overheat easily either, but will in warm climates when used in the open sun. Whether that is relevant to you, depends on where you live. The FX3 is a bit more workhorse, but the A7S3 no slouch. The button layout of the FX3 is better suited for video, e.g. the zoom rocker for powerzoom lenses. But the buttons on the A7S3 can be customised such that it will work very smoothly too. The rigging is not a big argument for me, neither is the audio handle. Sure, the FX3 has the buit-in cage, but there are plenty of half and full cages available for the A7S3 which you can make work. And the audio handle can also be used on the A7S3 if purchased separately, Smallrig makes an adapter plate which allows you to mount the handle on their cage (SmallRig part 4019). So if you prefer a camera with a viewfinder and the audio handle, that is possible too. Both cameras will give you great results, as the sensor performance and codecs are mainly identical

[@gamebreakerfn]

@@Edwin-- thank you for the detailed response 🙏🏼 I‘ll likely go with the A7S3 as a better fit for hybrid shooting. While my focus is on videos, I think it suits the purpose better than the FX3 😄

[@Edwin--]

@@gamebreakerfnI think it is a good choice. And if you value a viewfinder, there is no better one than on the A7S3, it's truly great. I personally like to use it with a half cage (Smallrig 3639), which allows for full access to the camera's controls, has a Arca Swiss bottom so you can fit it directly on a tripod / gimbal, while allowing you to add a monitor, mic, and extra handle whenever you like. Best of both worlds; clean compact camera, or rigged out in under a minute.

[@Tonellacam]

I hear people getting good deals on threads on uses ones but don't see it, a friend of a friend is selling an a7siii for 2k that im thinking about buying , but I really want an fx3 !!!

[@yessum6477]

Get the fx3 the siii is just a way better set up overall for the future

[@nightdonutstudio]

You look at the price of Canon R5, R5c, it drops so much That as Sony user I am really jealous. a7sIII and fx3 still sale at original price 3-4 years ago.

[@abudesamuel6727]

yooooo I was watching this till he made the joke about where the fingers suppose to be hahahahahaha I'm dying

[@SuperPhunThyme100]

I think the new FX cam thats rumored to come this year is likely an FX9 successor of some sort. Its due for an update, and it was notably left out of the firmware updates announced last month for the FX3,30, and 6.

[@kylemeshna]

Agreed!

[@BrandonTalbot]

Sounds like a bone. So stoked for the MKII of the FX3

[@raman139]

Hlo bro, How do you compare image quality of fx 3 and fx30? I am a fx30 owner and never used fx 3, how bad is fx30 compared to fx3 in your terms. Please share thoughts

[@iDealMedley]

I work on both footage before. FX30 is not bad it's just much more grainier require u to expose properly. Fx3 is a cheat code when comes to exposing ur image. But fx3 is a old camera missing feature like variable shutter which FX30 has.

[@raman139]

@@iDealMedley thank you bro for replying. What do you think is the proper way to expose the image in fx30 as opposed to fx 3. Also bro someone wants to trade their zv-e1 with my fx30, I am on a cusp to make a decision. Less reliable with better image quality vs super reliable with less superior quality. Please share thoughts

[@ScreenFiends]

A full frame camera will (typically) always maintain a lead when it comes to noise. You can apply the crop factor to work out that essentially that difference is about 1stop (compared to APS-C) If you shoot in studio or have lights, simply keep your ISO at it's native and adjust your lights instead. The image will be just as clean. The FoV and DoF will look different though, but people are way to overly invested in trying to make their crop sensor cams look like full frame came. Focus on lighting, staging camera movement.

[@iDealMedley]

@@raman139 in good lighting condition and also if you have fast lenses(f1. 2- 1.4) FX30 works too. Fx30 image quality is good don't think otherwise. But it's way easier to shoot with the fx3 sensor in unpredictable lighting situations but in a controlled environment FX30 performs as good Is there a specific feature that makes u leaning on one over another??

[@kizuzuxie2049]

huhh waiting for a7siv and fx 3 mk II

[@BalaHewinson]

Just got an fx3 local for $2100.. pretty crazy deal and I’m super stoked with it

[@thorffynd]

Where??

[@ToxicTurtleIsMad]

That is an INSANE deal bro.

[@challengedollar2880]

bro sounds like zuck but in camera world

[@invisibleadversary]

I definitely think the FX3 is worth it in 2024. Like so many other cameras on the market, the FX3 is a tremendous piece of tech and you can pretty much cut between any of these cameras and fool even the trained eye. I feel like a slew of amazing cameras got released since 2020 and camera tech has almost plateaued. It really just comes down to personal preferences and use cases. It will only diminish in relevancy when 4k ceases to be the standard which might be 4-6 years.

[@aybee5908]

Canon EF lenses: 229

[@Esoterixxx]

The dual base iso is 800 and 12800 not 640

[@JosueEscogido]

Sold my FX3 to buy a red and hands down the FX3 is the best sony I ever owned

[@kylemeshna]

Do you miss it?

[@JosueEscogido]

@@kylemeshna I still have a a74 so don’t really miss it but it is definitely the fx3 is a great camera

[@OmniVisionElite]

@@JosueEscogidoHow does that RED compare?

[@Flashback543]

Please Nikon Z9 shits on everything spec for spec look it up

[@nguyenkien5837]

I have to admit that sony released too many camera that they started to compete with each other even when they all in the same brand ( Sony )

[@lavinchi6709]

👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋👋

[@LongJohnson-rb4sr]

It is a thousand bucks cheaper in the USA. LOL. I am seriously considering to travel to the USA, spend the 1000 bucks on a nice 3 day vacation and then somehow smuggle it back to my home country without being caught by customs. It is insane how much of a scam the EU is.

[@kylemeshna]

That's crazy! I lived in Ireland for a few years and I remember how brutal it was, but I don't think it was that extreme back then

[@MyFriendlyPup]

No IBIS in 2024 means hard pass. Digital stabilization is 2006 tech.

[@kylemeshna]

What are you talking about? Fx3 has IBIS

[@yusei151]

you, ummm you lack the ability to comprehend information....even so legit cinema cameras dont even have ibis. So clearly this might not be a thing for you to want to dive into. But also ignorance is bliss...

[@SuperPhunThyme100]

Well, the Burano has Ibis...so...​@@yusei151

[@POVwithRC]

Wut

[@tremarquise4675]

Most cinema cams dont have IBIS!

[@2424rocket]

You’re so obviously straining to find something to say. As wonderful as our cameras are, they’re only tools for what you can do with them. You don’t need to buy a new camera every year.

[@cuckoobrain7999]

5:49 completely unnecessary and hideous AI generated crap