RISC-V 崛起有其時代的必然性。理由是美國以ARM為籌碼打壓異己。美國甚至想同樣限制開源的RISC-V,但反而使得RISC-V成為對抗霸權的領頭羊。RISC-V 的創始者 David Patterson 和他的團隊的初心也就是為了共享、共有。開源、對抗霸權已經成為無法反轉的時代潮流。
@zihechen3111 Жыл бұрын
@@jerryfrcc 人家arm私人企业和政府能有什么关系?
@franciswai1892 Жыл бұрын
I was an ARM employee in its early days. Many of your stated facts are not coherent with what I know. For example, Apple did not start ARM. It was one of its early customers and ARM was contracted to work on Newton (ever heard of it?). And ARM was not designed to be power efficient from the start. It came about because of its simpler architecture based on the Reduced Instruction Set.
二十多年前,團隊開始引入 Samsung S3C4510X/B,一路走來都在 arm 系列的 MCU/CPU 圈子內。現今也還在 Embedded Linux 圈子裡繼續與 arm 為伍,對 arm 是有種長年伙伴的情誼。 如今 RISC-V 來勢洶洶,頗有當年 arm 黑馬奔來的即視感。歷史總是不斷重演,對 arm 則有種不捨、不忍心的情懷。
@PingAnLi Жыл бұрын
资深前辈啊
@schiang Жыл бұрын
對於 ARM 的股價與獲利模式的分析很到位,就是不知道為何要將限制供應中國的原因連結到其為日本公司。難道當初不被軟銀收購現在就不會被限制嗎?