Click bit.ly/AIHHouseofHistory and download Warpath! Use the code SNIPER24 to get your in-game bonus. Join Warpath Tank Tower 2 mini-game: tanktower2-warpath.lilith.com/
@danielsantiagourtado343011 ай бұрын
Love your content! One of My favorites! 🔥🔥🔥🔥
@salvatoredefeo833511 ай бұрын
@@danielsantiagourtado3430❤
@andrewcharles4598 ай бұрын
I pay a premium to KZbin specifically so I won't have to watch annoying adverts.
@ISAF_Ace11 ай бұрын
Very good, the courage of the Regia Marina is so rarely discussed amid the incompetence of Axis strategy overall. When the battles were fought however, the Italians fought the good fight. I absolutely loved the video, one battle I have been interested in for a while are the various Malta convoys. Operation Harpoon in particular and its highly debateable outcome is a favourite of mine.
@HoH11 ай бұрын
I am currently working on the battles of Passaro and Spada!
@michaelmorgan928911 ай бұрын
My father was with the 8th Army in North Africa. In later years when he could talk about the war he told us that whoever had created the myth that the Italian Army were cowardly & useless hadn't faced the Italians in battle as at El Alamein the Italians, "fought like tigers" holding their positions until overrun. The italics " " are my Fathers words.
@elasolezito11 ай бұрын
@michaelmorgan9289 Greek here, my great grandfather was in the Albanian front during the Italian invasion. He went MIA (and angry cause relatives sold his property thinking he died). He came back and never discussed about what happened there. I think these people know better. There are many reasons an army may win or fail... Bless your father and his family.
@nicholasconder470310 ай бұрын
Interesting. My father flew with the Desert Air Force starting in 1942.
@ilmaio10 ай бұрын
That was largely leftist propaganda after the war, aiming to slander and shame the italian military and ridicule the regime. Truth be told, Italy had a powerful navy still set on WW1 tactics (speed, cannons, battleships - no radar, no carriers); the airforce had mostly outdated aircrafts, and the few modern ones, like the Veltro, in too small numbers. The Savoia Marchetti bombers had insufficient payloads for strategic relevance. The army was great in numbers, but poorly equipped and light tanks designed for alpine operation in narrow roads - typical WW1 - were no match for the shermans in an open theatre. Italian capabilities were - moreover - completely depleted after the colonial enterprise in Ethiopia ended in 1937 (Italy sent overall 600.000 men there, like the entire Desert Storm coalition of 990). This said, everything lacked but courage in the italian forces. Cavalry charges against armored divisions in Ukraine, the 10th MAS, the Folgore, the Bersaglieri, the Ariete division at El Alamein, the raid in Alexandria showed nothing but desperate courage, the one needed to fight hopeless fights. They had really a hard time during the war, and after when they returned home in a society completely turned hostile versus their sacrifice. However, everything was missing in the italian military, but valor. Tesei, Balbo, Durand de la Penne, Vallauri, Amedeo Guillet aka the devil commander, Todaro, Banfi, the Savoia cavalry regiment etc. Their historical biographics look like fictional material for adventure movies. They're not in the collective hero pantheon just because they were on the losing side, allied with the nazis and therefore involuntary accomplices of their horrors. Of which, in 1942/1943, nobody was aware of, by the way. So three times victims: of the italian regime, of the nazi barbarics, of the cinical communist propaganda when the war was over.
@Erzhler10 ай бұрын
I'm not sure but I heard the italien leadership was the problem and not the soldiers. Don't quote me on this but I think Erwin Rommel said the italien soldiers were very... resilient? Strong? I don't really remember but he praised the italien soldiers and criticised their leaders for being too arrogant and stuff
@marioluongo72387 ай бұрын
Congratulations for the analysis. Deep knowledge of the Italiano military History.
@dayros202311 ай бұрын
Very interesting video, the Regia Marina during WW2 accomplished its job of escorting convoys to Libya, with most transports reaching Africa, but the lack of its own planes was a big problem. The rivalry with the air force was also based on the fact that the navy was staunchly monarchic while the Regia Aeronautica was more loyal to Mussolini, that gave it a lot of resources.
@asatru198611 ай бұрын
Well all major Axis Powers suffered the fate of conflicts in their Army Branches Germany had the infamous Operation Viking i don't think the italians blundered as bad as this.
@onthatrockhewillbuildhisch151011 ай бұрын
At 7:30 the destroyer Vampire should be labelled HMAS as she was part of the Australian Navy.
@andrewstackpool491111 ай бұрын
Royal Australian Navy. And the CO HMAS Sydney then was CAPT John Collins, later CNS VADM Sir John Collins
@TheIndianalain11 ай бұрын
Great video, Reggia Marina rarely gets any credit for its actions during WWII.
@tombogan0388411 ай бұрын
British sources often comment that the Italian Navy had the best range finding, and the worst dispersal of their salvos. There was a case caught on photo of a first salvo straddle of a British ship at over 25000 Yards. Range is perfect but the shells hit so far for and aft that the ship never got wet.
@robbabcock_11 ай бұрын
Cool video! The contributions of Italy to the Axis are not nearly so well covered as they might be.
@HoH11 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@iainmc985911 ай бұрын
I think you'll find they were British and Australian ships not 'English' !
@mohammedsaysrashid358711 ай бұрын
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about a naval strike between Italy and Britain 🇬🇧 naval forces during WW2..on Mediterranean sea.. Thank you for an excellent (house of history) channel ..for sharing this wonderful epic
@HoH11 ай бұрын
Thank you for always leaving such a nice comment!
@Fatherofheroesandheroines11 ай бұрын
The Italians actually fought pretty well in most scenarios, even the disaster of Operation Compass, at low-levels. Unfortunately, the higher ups were stuck in a ridiculous mindset that doomed their war aims.
@dannytallmage297111 ай бұрын
This simply isn’t true. Italy’s largest contribution to anti-Comintern forces were the innovations of a few high level tactical thinkers like Junio Valerio Borghese. The Italian army wasn’t ready for the kind of kenetic, combined warfare that WW2 inaugurated.
@jacobew200011 ай бұрын
@@dannytallmage2971 The problem with the Italian army, was that they spent all the 1920s and early 1930s upgrading their army... but by 1939, most of their tanks and airplanes were already out of date. They were using 1920s technology, while everything the allies were using by 1940, was new technology. Their planes were too slow, tanks to slow and undergunned. Even the US M2 outgunned most of their tanks.
@Fatherofheroesandheroines10 ай бұрын
@@dannytallmage2971 it was the Axis NOT the Comintern.
@dannytallmage297110 ай бұрын
@@Fatherofheroesandheroines the axis was literally the name for nations that joined the anti-Comintern pact. Please address your ignorance.
@Fatherofheroesandheroines10 ай бұрын
@@dannytallmage2971 not in the war it wasn't. Also none of them were natural allies. What I said still stands about the Italians as well, ESPECIALLY Mussolini.
@palaz741710 ай бұрын
My grandmother's sister was engaged with a sailor on board Espero. When she learned of the sinking from radio, she immediatly got sick and died shortly after from heartbreak, as my grandma use to say. They were supposed to get married in that summer 1940, but he was called back on duty due to war declaration. She was 19 and the boy 21. Recently I have met one of the nephews of the late sailor, who told me that in his family they tell the same story about this girl dying from sorrow because of their relative's death.
@RedTide311 ай бұрын
Naval content is top tier
@KHK00111 ай бұрын
Great video as always HOH!
@joselitostotomas811411 ай бұрын
So rate of fire vs accuracy then. I'm assuming radar fire control wasn't present?
@PeteL-u1d11 ай бұрын
Not yet. 3 years later it would.
@deejj976611 ай бұрын
Excellent video. Looking forward to the next one
@perrinayebarra10 ай бұрын
I’m always amazed how fast some of these old ships were.
@neal657511 ай бұрын
What’s up with the map of Italian East Africa? It shows most of Kenya, Uganda and the Swahili Coast as part of it, when they were all in fact British colonies.
@mbathroom111 ай бұрын
congrats on 200,000 subscribers man!
@HoH11 ай бұрын
Thank you very much!
@mbathroom111 ай бұрын
you're weclome@@HoH
@danielsantiagourtado343011 ай бұрын
Love your content! Keep up the good work! You're amazing ❤❤❤❤❤
@icrazieelliotgamer733811 ай бұрын
My Grandad was on HMS LIVERPOOL in that battle,he never said to much about the War and sometimes I would ask him about it and he would tell me because I was just a kid,my Grandma told me my uncle Andrew was named after his best friend who died on HMS LIVERPOOL in one of the battles.GOD BLESS YOU GRANDAD.❤
@CelxD11 ай бұрын
Another great video! ♥
@diogofilipeestevao11 ай бұрын
At 2:15 there is an error on the map, as Portugal is an independent country in 1940, and not part of Spain.
@davidb853911 ай бұрын
Great video about a little known event. The Italians get an undeservedly bad review of their performance at sea. Minor point - English and British shouldn't be used interchangeably. It would be like referring to the US Atlantic Fleet as New York ships rather than American ships.
@johnallen780711 ай бұрын
Plus it annoys the Scots etc. (which is a good thing lol)
@davidb853911 ай бұрын
@@johnallen7807 well we do all the fighting, after all. haha nah just kidding, it does tend to get the goat of the Welsh, Irish and Scottish descendants of soldiers and sailors though. Actually stopped watching another historian because of this.
@johnallen780711 ай бұрын
It's the "diversity" that gives us strength, not the s**t that Blair talks about! I did an attachment with a Scottish unit and we had to learn Highland dancing under the RSM, they took it VERY seriously!@@davidb8539
@geoffburrill985011 ай бұрын
The Italian Navy never lacked bravery.
@chucknorris66407 ай бұрын
HMAS Sydney suffered a terrifying ending. A year later HMAS Sydney was sunk with all hands lost by the German auxiliary cruiser Kormoran
@HoH7 ай бұрын
The video about the Sydney-Kormoran encounter is out for patrons now, and will be uploaded next week!
@donbrashsux11 ай бұрын
The Logistics or lack of in WW2 is simply staggering
@benwilson614510 ай бұрын
I have no idea how your comment is relevant
@AdamBechtol11 ай бұрын
Nice. Thanks.
@anthonypenny336211 ай бұрын
English cruisers?, British and Australian if you don't mind
@Entropyisheresy11 ай бұрын
He keeps making this mistake, it’s really off putting.
@giulianoilfilosofo79275 ай бұрын
Many people outside of the UK don't get the distinction because the English component has always been the dominant one politically and culturally
@Busybee-tt1qu10 ай бұрын
Bravery and sacrifice doesn’t care what flag it fly’s under. The brave are just ordinary people behaving in an extraordinary way.
@YasserMaghribi11 ай бұрын
14:20 Please do the Battle of the Three Kings !
@jamescarr632411 ай бұрын
Italian navy performed better than the narrative on Italian forces during ww2..however they were dead on arrival it was just how long (unless they had occupied Gibraltar and or the suez)...even if they had waited till 42 to enter..the gig was up as soon as the US entered....the material advantages the allies had was insurmountable..it was never if but always when..of course I certainly understand how hindsight makes it obvious now but not so much at the time
@Khalifrio11 ай бұрын
While I think the Italian Navy gets a bum rap during WW2. But, Baroni going down with the ship wasn't gallant at all. In fact it was stupid. He denied his nation his experience and knowledge. By covering the other two escaping destroyers he more than made up for losing his ship which was outnumbered and way out gunned.
@papageitaucher61811 ай бұрын
Wouldnt have brought them much as a pow
@Khalifrio11 ай бұрын
@@papageitaucher618 After the war he would have been invaluable.
@Griboslaw11 ай бұрын
@@Khalifriotell it to all released vets after a war who were struggling to find a job. You are not correct here.
@Khalifrio11 ай бұрын
@@Griboslaw Once the Cold War started all those officers were back in uniform leading their respective branches of the German and Italian militaries. Go look it up.
@longinogiorda3411 ай бұрын
Sirs, you were not there. And you missed to respect a man/ crew they knew they were going to die. Keyboard lions, shut the f..up. And read the history before to say bs.
@brokenbridge631611 ай бұрын
Nicely done video
@HoH11 ай бұрын
Thank you very much!
@brokenbridge631611 ай бұрын
@@HoH---Your welcome. I enjoy a video that often sheds light on little known battles or subjects.
@jamieoglethorpe11 ай бұрын
They were British ships, not English. There had been no English navy since the 17th century. Also, your map didn't show Portugal. The country convinced Spain to stay neutral in WW II.
@HoH11 ай бұрын
Noted! British from now on 😉I overlooked it during the proofreading.
@benwilson614510 ай бұрын
And please do not forget That HMAS Sydney was Australian!
@jamieoglethorpe10 ай бұрын
@@benwilson6145 Depends on your zoom. I was zoomed out!
@xmaniac9911 ай бұрын
Well at least they weren't suck by incompetent Luftwaffe "support"
@jp-um2fr10 ай бұрын
Right back to the days of Nelson when the only chance a captain had of hitting an enemy was to pay for gunpowder and shot himself, it's not surprising British gunnery was dreadful. Our Challenger tanks were rationed ONE, that's ONE bl**dy round a year. £60 for a practice round. No doubt it has been increased now, probably 2 rounds. Not that we can now make rounds for the excellent rifled gun they are replacing with a drainpipe. Can you imagine what happens to a fin stabilised round at long ranges with a crosswind ? The Americans refused to take part in a shoot off because it was too windy. Christ, I wish I was joking. 38 years, British MOD engineer.
@peregrinemccauley501010 ай бұрын
. Expert gunnery, tenacious seamen, coupled with formidable warships, on paper a frightening prospect to overcome. Disorganised though.
@anti-Russia-sigma11 ай бұрын
You should feature ex UK field marshal Douglas Haig,ex UK field marshal Horatio Herbert Kitchener & ex US general George McClellan.
@ilmaio10 ай бұрын
Your videos are technical and well made, however, you stubbornly persist in not mentioning how a destroyer is desperately outgunned by a cruiser (or light cruiser alike). A destroyer (short for submarine destroyer - or "cacciatorpediniere") is a light, fast, manouvrable midsized ship designed for antisom operation and escort. A cruiser is basically a smaller battleship, armored and armed with heavy guns. It has armor that a destroyer shells cannot penetrate, and a far superior range. Imagine a 80 kg boxer fighting against a 55 kg one. The destroyer will get hit before coming at range to launch torpedoes (the best weapons they have) - and any received hit by the heavier shells of the cruiser will cripple it unrecoverably. Trying to duel with shells equally unfeasible, for the same reason. Imagine a leopard facing a tiger, or a dog facing a bear. The poor thing just stands no chance. Not everyone in the public may know that, if you thell the gun caliber in mm for the italian destroyer (so many) and the gun caliber of the british cruiser in inches (much less). Show the shells in proportion, instead. No destroyer, for how enhanced, is a match for a cruiser, doesn't matter how "light". It's even worst than putting a cruiser against a battleship: a different class of warship, and the smaller one has no real chance of damaging the larger one, even if the aim of the big ship is bad. And the first hit received, the destroyer is finished. You're supposed to say that, honestly.
@davidcunningham207411 ай бұрын
a moving story
@NeilHardy-i4l5 ай бұрын
Why the silly flashy bits on photos
@preece118811 ай бұрын
They're British not English ships (notwithstanding the Australians amongst them)
@janlindtner30511 ай бұрын
👍👍👍
@tommay659011 ай бұрын
Why „Admiral“ the video called him Captain, and did not mention any promotion posthumously…???
@typxxilps11 ай бұрын
New voice ?
@JohnCampbell-co1qk10 ай бұрын
The English ⁉️
@DD-qw4fz11 ай бұрын
Rip
@tombogan0388411 ай бұрын
The only thing wrong with your video's is that they are too short.
@napoleonibonaparte719811 ай бұрын
The Army usually creates a bad name for the entire armed forces.
@Rubenandrefialho11 ай бұрын
so portugal does not exist its only spain -.-" portugal is not spain
@colinallen892410 ай бұрын
English?
@slawomirguzik11 ай бұрын
You wrote Poland and Czechoslovakia on the map. At that time, both of these countries had already been conquered by Nazi Germany. Such inscriptions falsely suggest that Poland and Czechoslovakia were in alliance with Nazi Germany.
@mbryson289911 ай бұрын
Both were marked as "Occupied" on the map presented. How could it have been made more clear in your opinion?
@slawomirguzik11 ай бұрын
@@mbryson2899 Names of the conquered areas at that time should be marked. General Government and Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia.
@AdmiralKodai11 ай бұрын
can you guys stop using the old film look. It looks horrible and is distracting.
@HoH11 ай бұрын
What would you rather see?
@AdmiralKodai11 ай бұрын
just don't use it. It just doesn't very look good. You don't to have it. Otherwise, you guys are doing great stuff. :) @@HoH
@AdamBechtol11 ай бұрын
The frame/background is fine. But having the little white splotches is kinda distracting and necessary. Espcially here where one of your images was a color painting, lol.@@HoH