Law for Non-Lawyers - Standards of Review

[@VoxUrbana]

This video should have 1000s of view! Valuable valuable ...

[@AceHardy]

Taking notes 📝

[@brenthill3241]

These people are doing good work. Without them the various entities with badges would be having a free for all at an individual's expense.

[@jackwyatt1218]

Correct

[@yunggolem4687]

The badges are having a free-for-all anyway.

[@lovenloyalty777]

@@yunggolem4687 Yes they are and it's called civil forfeiture.

[@cravinbob]

"Qualified immunity" and the well-known but 'look the other way' when a cop is "testi-lying".

[@SailingSarah]

You mean as is currently the case for the foreseeable future?

[@edwardbearjames2916]

If the government can suspend your rights at any time, then they aren't rights, they are permissions.

[@Platoface]

Excellent conversation.

[@videosabia]

I still don't quite follow. For those of us that are non-lawyers, what does it mean when "standards of review" are cited as a rationale for upholding a tribunal decision?

[@Constitution1789]

Both of them are great.

[@prex345]

What have we learned, a lot of societies problems are a result of work done by people with Esq at the end of their name. Thanks

[@charleytuna9567]

How did the laws get approved in the first place. We need to bring the heat on the legislature equally, if not more so like your bringing to the Judiciary. How would can one hold the legislatures ( or whatever Board of Officials) responsible for these ridiculous laws creation accountable?

[@lovenloyalty777]

I'd say most likely a good number of laws became so for 2 reasons. First being a lack of integrity with full blown greed and second those who would benefit from the law has a wad of cash. Simply, the wad of cash fits in the greedy hands of those in the law passing profession that lack any basic integrity.

[@jackwyatt1218]

BTW prosecutors and judges are politicians, usually seeking higher office. That is a great reason to do your jury duty and vote your conscience. Why else do we need a jury of, originally, your peers.

[@MoonChildMedia]

95% of all cases are plea bargained because prosecutors are among the most corrupt politicians with massive amounts of unchecked power.

[@jackwyatt1218]

@@MoonChildMedia take back your power and do your jury duty and nullify bad law!!!

[@BrianGallas]

It's awful... because it's true. Sadly, so many jurors succumb to prosecutors and their tendency to story tell.

[@dawsonjgyou]

Very interesting. I wonder if there are Standards of Review or equivalent practices in the courts of other countries?

[@allyshivers3082]

In other words its blown all out of proportion like every thing else today

[@zyxwvutsrqponmlkh]

Most of your other deep dives where unwatchable boring because of my total indifference to the subject matter. I really don't care abut the licensing process for making a business in DC is or how teachers unions hate competition. Amicus briefs was ok, but I knew most of it already. Now this one, it was really interesting.

[@jupitercyclops6521]

"Operating in a cloud" is a nice way of saying "full of sh^t" And it's the norm when it comes to our legal system

[@jupitercyclops6521]

Exactly +; Why do we pretend our court system is a legitimate organization ? The judicial doesn't work for justice or the rights of citizens. We should have completely scrapped it after qualified immunity

[@nerdsofgotham]

Rational inquiry doesn't require evidence? 600 years of science down the drain.

[@Kelly-tk7lu]

My friends play video games and got in a fight so now I’m a fake lawyer and I gotta learn lmao

[@jamessang1704]

Interesting, strict scrutinity!!

[@ljbbenson3762]

Please ,..I believe opportunity to expose light on the systemic behavior & make change IN COLORADO ..

[@jeffpricefamily3905]

To me this goes to show that there is a severe breakdown in understanding the Rights of the People, life and the courts are sooo involved in Admiralty Maritime Commerce Jurisdiction that we are loosing sight of our Rights. For instance, everyone has a drivers license, but the definition of driving is clarified in Federal Law and we are alowing them to take advantage of us. We have a Right to Travel KENT ET AL. vs. DULLES, SECRETARY OF STATE. 357 U.S. 116 (1958) No. 481. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 10, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. {15th Paragraph } The right to travel is a part of the "liberty" of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. So much is conceded by the Solicitor General. In Anglo-Saxon law that right was emerging at least as early as the Magna Carta.[12] Chafee, 126*126 Three Human Rights in the Constitution of 1787 (1956), 171-181, 187 et seq., shows how deeply engrained in our history this freedom of movement is. Freedom of movement across frontiers in either direction, and inside frontiers as well, was a part of our heritage. Travel abroad, like travel within the country, may be necessary for a livelihood. It may be as close to the heart of the individual as the choice of what he eats, or wears, or reads. Freedom of movement is basic in our scheme of values. See Crandall v. Nevada, 6 Wall. 35, 44; Williams v. Fears, 179 U. S. 270, 274; Edwards v. California, 314 U. S. 160. "Our nation," wrote Chafee, "has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases." Id., at 197. Freedom of movement also has large social values. As Chafee put it: The definition of driving is : 18 U.S. Code Part 1, Ch. 2, § 31 - Definitions (6) Motor vehicle. The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and “used for commercial purposes” on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo. (10) Used for commercial purposes.- The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. U.S. Code 49, Chapter 131 - General Provisions § 13102. Definitions (14)Motor carrier.- The term “motor carrier” means a person providing motor vehicle transportation for compensation. Are they required to inform us about this ? , if you do you are ignorant.

[@breadfan1071]

Drug laws have been "enforced" for how long and haven't stopped anything! How could the government prove it "works"? If I'm in a state that still outlaws marijuana, with the interstate commerce (like the wine case), shouldn't I be allowed to import marijuana from a "legal" state? Most laws are irrational!

[@rosesmith6208]

me I am a lover of the law (bible) and you dont need a collage degree to love Gods laws and understand how they apply, Jehovah teaches us for free, a lawyer is a lover of law and despite the corruption in the courts it is nice there are people who truly love the law (not necessarily mans' opinion passed as laws) and try to use the law to help people rather than fleech their charges. honesty of heart is more important to Jehovah twisting and turning arguments to justify wicked laws angers that hurt people angers him..

[@ulfhenarpolymathmilitant6258]

Um , bruh... if the discussion of law or law's needs to take place then it means there is WAY TO MANY LAWS ON THE FRIGGIN BOOKS .....................CASE CLOSED , if you feel the need to discuss a law or laws it means that they are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!! this is what a NO BRAINER discussion LOOKS LIKE.

[@nerdsofgotham]

So weird to see people talking in the same room. Zoom has killed me.

[@SrChalice]

It's only weird because you subscribed to the nonsense. Unsubscribe buddy

[@jackwyatt1218]

as in Organic Constitution be damned?! This is a legal SYSTEM.

[@BILL-vi7vd]

Who pay your check.

[@oligarchytheatre777]

Also, with Ancient Aboriginal Indigenous civilizations practices that predates America itself government has no rights to CONTROL or RESTRICT taught masters in their crafts if there's no harm, etc... I think people are basically circumventing many beautiful REALITIES be being basic in important things within law...

[@allyshivers3082]

Duh they been trying to take our 1st amendment right since the 60s

[@allyshivers3082]

We have no right to travel RIGHT NOW

[@allyshivers3082]

Its also discrimination

[@barretharms6948]

If one does not recognize logic, Then one cannot come up with common sense of their own. It seems that a judge is not required to recognize logic or even apply it, For what purpose do we give a judge immunity? For what purpose does the Constitution give judges immunity? What is the purpose for limited immunity? My family will not stop asking questions until we can justify what binds us.

[@AirHeadBoone]

help

[@zplanetx8050]

Law for non Lawyers... see here Taxpayer.... You volunteered to be a taxpayer and are no longer under the Organic constitution. you are under the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia and so what DC deems statuary law you must obey....(Simply put it; If you participate in an organization, you must comply with it's rules and regulations...?) No Law makes you a Taxpayer but by your own volunteerism. No one in Congress will every get prosecuted in this two party government, just resign... that's their free ticket? Here is your Ticket as follows: A Citation is a letter of Writ: which is a command for (private Taxpayer) and municipalities employees to perform a certain duty under statutory law which was designed for Taxpayers and not for NonTapayers ( AkA true free Americans known as “A People”.... Amish, just to mention a few) famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChallJurisdiction/how-to-respond-to-contempt-of-court.pdf No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24 famguardian.org Economy Plumbing & Heating v. U.S., 470 F2d. 585 (1972) "The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collection. They relate to taxpayers, and not to nontaxpayers. The latter are without their scope. No procedure is prescribed for nontaxpayers, and no attempt is made to annul any of their rights and remedies in due course of law. With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws..." see...SA-521 Honorable Supreme Court justice John Harlan Downes v. bidwell 182 U.S. 244,381 A.D. 1901 “The idea prevails with some, indeed it has expression in arguments at the bar, that we have in this country substantially two national governments: one to be maintained under the Constitution with all its restrictions; (NonTaxpayers) the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to…(Taxpayers)..... The Constitution is not to be obeyed or disobeyed as the circumstances of a particular crisis in our history may suggest the one or the other course to be pursued. The People have decree that it shall be the supreme law of the land at all times. When the acquisition of territory becomes complete, by cession, the Constitution necessarily becomes the supreme law of such new territory, and no power exists in any Department of the Government to make "concessions" that are inconsistent with its provisions. The authority to make such concessions implies the existence in Congress of power to declare that constitutional provisions may be ignored under special or embarrassing circumstances. No such dispensing power exist in any branch of our Government. The constitution is supreme over every foot of territory, wherever situated, under the jurisdiction of the United States, and its full operation cannot be stayed by any branch of the Government in order to meet what some my suppose to be extraordinary emergencies. 28 U.S. Code § 1604.Immunity of a foreign state from jurisdiction Subject to existing international agreements to which the United States (District of Columbia) is a party at the time of enactment of this Act a foreign state shall be immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States and of the States except as provided in sections 1605 to 1607 of this chapter. 8 U.S. Code Chapter 12.§ 1101.Definitions A...(22) The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States,(Taxpayer) or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States,(non-Taxpayer) owes permanent allegiance to the United States. Listen carefully when he is asked if he uses money?(Money is DC jurisdiction, Gold and silver are We the People jurisdiction?) kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5rWgmprh62lsJI

[@jamespickens1154]

.Law is semple other peoples right does not; Trump no other man/woman. I do not recognize anyone's right or government to one minute of my life. Nor to any part of my energy. Nor to any achievement of mine. No matter who makes the claim, how large their number, or how great their need I am a man who does not exist for others. A gift from the true Devin. For example in man's law, that man's law does not apply to another man without his/her consent is the only thing rational; do no harm and help your fellow being.

[@jamespickens1154]

JUSTICE JU-no-law, S-Speak, TI-Title-CE-Judge JUDGE TITLE SPEAKS NO LAW

[@TheAdequateMedia]

we shouldn't be providing ***************PRIVATE ENTITY FOR PROFIT*************** religious churches. i went to a cult christian (normal cultish christian) school and it was terribly expensive

[@ljbbenson3762]

Help this pro se victim in CO ....

[@horserose17]

Habakkuk 1:1-17 How did YOU LET IT GET TO THIS ASK the Eternal ???? Isaiah 10:1,2 "ALL laws which are REPUGNANT to the Constitution are NULL and VOID."Marbury vs.Madision ,5 US (2 Cranch)137,174,176,(1803 !!!An unconstitutional law is NOT law it confers no rights it imposes no duties ;affords no protection it creates no OFFICE, it is in legal contemplation ,as INOPERATIVE as though it had never been passed Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p.442 No ONE IS BOUND TO OBEY an UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW and no courts are bound to ENFORCE it". 16 Am Jur 22d,See 177 late 2d. Sec 256 !@!!!!LAW