CJI Shocked Sibal Remark ; Hindu Came Not Muslims "

CJI Shocked Sibal Remark ; Hindu Came Not Muslims " #lawchakra #analysis #supremecourtofindia
#SeniorAdvocateKapilSibal Represent Assam NRC
Follow us on Twitter:- / lawchakra
Follow us on Whatsapp : whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5...
Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
For business Enquiries:- [e-mail]
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
/ lawchakra
👉 Instagram.
/ lawchakras
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

[@debajitkumardas8649]

Let Sibbal go and live in any Muslim dominated areas within India! Hope, he'd be able to live freely

[@khyatikothari4492]

Outside india. As per his argument if Pakistan and Bangladesh Muslims should be accepted in India, am sure he should be happily accepted in these countries

[@Richi.-rich]

Send him to old city in Hyderabad. He will forget all the arguments

[@ginnip8670]

He will go to tihar someday

[@user-vi4jy4yo2v]

@@khyatikothari4492and we shall send u to Uganda 🇺🇬

[@elborrador333]

@@najmulhaque3716 How can truth send bad message. He is only speaking truth.

[@tanaystudies]

Repeating The Well Said Quote : "Sound Is Measured In Decibels, Nonsense Is Measured In Kapilsibals".

[@rajumandal9408]

😂..

[@deepikam7731]

Who said this.

[@MS-ov9sv]

😂😂😂😂

[@Sargeras05]

🤣🤣🤣

[@satraj2815]

😂😂😂😂

[@sateeshpothu4320]

Enemies within the country are more dangerous than external enemies.. Like him siblu

[@shyamnarayanmishra5363]

Like Kapil sibbal.

[@shyamnarayanmishra5363]

Sibbal argues that immigration of Muslims after 1971 from eastern pakistan is also entitled to enjoy all rights of Indian democracy. Which is absolutely wrong. They may stay only as refuges. He is misleading कोर्ट by absurd arguments by hiding the statement of then leaders " the minority only can be given citizenship of India not others who were majority and asked for separate regions of country .

[@nehajain7699]

True

[@aravamudhans5096]

Within the Supreme Court too

[@omspeed23]

Not siblu it's called stupiditlu

[@pkc3552]

CJI is humbly requested not give any hearing of Adv Sibal

[@souravkumawat1246]

If you don't hear him then how would you declare he is speaking foolishly.

[@parthamajumder5058]

Kick out sibbal from the court room

[@sj2536pa]

Exactly..

[@lifathoninc9279]

Lol. He runs that shit...

[@MotoVikz]

Out of the country please

[@nandlalsingh644]

Sibal is talking nonsense . Hindu Bengali and other ethnic Hindu minorities wanted to migrate to India and not Muslim.

[@tim069]

lol

[@kamalchauhan5470]

​@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pnbcoz of religious persecussion in bangladesh

[@shivshankarchoubey1871]

​@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pnBecause this is their right, when the country was divided in the name of religion, then all Hindus are citizens of India, not you.

[@Sam-hu3cw]

​@indraneelsarkar8590because India is democratic and secular country that doesn't represent any religion .. By your logic Sikh and other minorities should have their own country isn't it 🤡

[@AnilKumar-to2pc]

even though his people were murdered in pakistan still he doesnt learn

[@vanshikamudgil8255]

Our country was divided on the basis of religion, now you cannot question us when we protect those who were left behind.

[@gagandeepchaurasiya3662]

Saddest part is he was our law minister 🤬

[@user-xyz766-aBclmpq]

He is the one who made the law in the case of a riot anywhere in India, started by whoever, only the majority community, meaning Hindoo, would be responsible.

[@humblebutterflys7809]

it was a gift from a party whose agenda is always anti hindu

[@lakshminarayan6234]

Enemies within are more treacherous than the Enemy at the gates.

[@jj-yi1ne]

who are you in this world?

[@DJ-hl4xd]

​@@jj-yi1newhat point you trying to make by asking who is he....what is he saying is completely fact.... people who are celebrating the funeral of a terrorist or mafia....are always be a enemy for country

[@skbachoti]

This guy is typical of Congress mindset. Why blame him? He was born & brought up there in Congress.

[@farhanikhat284]

So u consider the minority muslims ur enemy?

[@SaveManWoman]

You sound like you don’t like facts.

[@swamyguptadogiparthi7993]

Sibal with all his antihindu mindset,tried to put forth his arguments in such a convincing way that nobody can deny..but ,CJI is equally strongly putting forth his points..a decent way to stop the anti hindu undercurrent..hats of to you sir 💐💐

[@indianmilitary]

Sibal is simply bullshitting (again) using word salad. Articulate but still bullshit

[@treesajohnson6321]

Sibal. is not anti-Hindu however, he is a learned knowledgeable Hindu and very well aware of India and its History.

[@crusaders581]

​@@treesajohnson6321but he is underestimating the populace....this can cause riots..where mikkions of minorities will massacred ...no one can stop public.

[@utkarshsingh7638]

He's not anti hindu, just another guy chasing the money.

[@umwelten988]

Convincing ❌ conniving ✔️

[@rajagopalnair7897]

Sibal will change his father for money. He must barred to enter courts across the country.

[@JohnnyRotten-uf6xw]

That's undemocratic and against free speech.

[@JohnnyRotten-uf6xw]

This is a comedy show, if we silence him, life would become too boring.

[@omspeed23]

He will sell his wife also for money .

[@hrishabhjoshi5847]

Kapil sibal is the reason, India needs to careful with enemies within our country.

[@aanandkumaar7800]

East Pakistanis were Indians till 1971? Wow! What an argument!! Speechless...

[@induchopra3014]

Confidently lying. They created Pakistan. They werePakistanis . Not indians. They were foreigners. Or why india was divided? They didn't want to be Indians. They consider being muslim their identity. They dont consider being bengali or indian their identity. Why two nation theory if they considered themselves Indians? Explain

[@nihalchandarora]

Foolish argument absolutely wasteing valuable time of Hon'ble SC

[@baldbonkers7246]

Badti Umar ke sath insaan thoda sanak jaata hai, whi horaha hai

[@DAILYSHORTS101]

@@baldbonkers7246 🤣🤣

[@dvdv183]

Funny argument.. if they are to be considered as Indians, then can we take back the whole Pakistan ? including the land.. if so, I think we can agree.. same with West Bengal too..

[@desi_patriot]

How much hatred Sibal has for Hindus... It shocks my mind to no end

[@aries5534]

Kapil sibal is just a puppet, he reports to Congress high command which hates Hindus to the core

[@7vj7ik]

Not hindus, only andaybhakt

[@israelimanashe8608]

​@@7vj7ik and you are Chatukaar 😅

[@7vj7ik]

@@israelimanashe8608 tu bi 🤣🤣

[@Nanded12345]

He hates Hindus not andhbhakt ​@@7vj7ik

[@nipunkothare]

These people ruled our country for decades. The system was so rotten, no wonder India was so behind. Not anymore.

[@archanasaxena5328]

कपिल जी से पूछना चाहिए कि हिन्दु कहां से आये थे,महाभारत,रामायण से मिल रहे सबूत क्या बताते है इसलिए आपका वक्तव्य तथ्य हीन है

[@rajagopalnair7897]

Well said

[@antxaveace]

1:00 Mahabharata and Ramayana are mythical . The two mythical stories were written by the Aryans who had passed into India through Khyber pass from the steppes of Iran and who were nomads , to facilitate themselves to show that they are the superior race . Do not juxtapose Hinduism with those two mythical stories. The coinage ' Hindu ' came into existence about 200 years , more particularly after the entry into the Indian shores - the East India Company. 😊😊😊

[@Anmathews]

Kapil Sybil is not aware that East Pakistan was already another country in 1971.

[@deeptinair2914]

Bangladesh

[@mrigazoa]

East Pakistan formed in 1947 , in 1971 Bangladesh is formed.

[@sayan890]

He knows but lying is his habit

[@iankiii]

He knows but just trying to confuse The judges

[@faizanshaikh2025]

Aagaya antimuslim

[@RajeshDogar]

Sibbal has no words to say. He is beating about bush.

[@Somd55]

Beating around the bush.

[@abhilashjha6281]

​@@Somd55typo hoga bhai..

[@smitaswarup8562]

You do not know, Const is a living one. It is to be studied in context of history and circumstances. You people need to have a civics lesson. Sibal is a grt constl expert.

[@2000superayush]

​​@@smitaswarup8562copy pasting the same comment sans any logic. He's trying to give the constitutional rights to immigrants on the grounds of undivided India? He is talking utter nonsense. There was east Pakistan already in existence prior to 1971. And ofc he's throwing the Assam accord out of the window. Fool!

[@sanjeevanipaediatric951]

He is trying for Law Jihad

[@__Leo_0123]

What about the Muslims stayed back in 1947 and not send to Pak under the agreement of populatin exchange

[@The90sbuoyy]

That’s why today’s politics exists on religion

[@gvsmanianganapathy6177]

The main reason for this is Gandhi and Nehru who are by Muslims. Now India is suffering because of those

[@bharatjoshi4140]

All this debate shows that a lawyer can present the facts in either ways, according to the case he is advocating for !! Such people like Kapil sibal are above their consciousness !!

[@babucherian8419]

Sibal is going out of his mind. I totally bewildered by his statements.

[@Shubham-pr9cq]

Pakistan ka matlab kya la ilaha illallah The point is what is Bengali After the forming of Pakistan then Bangladesh occur

[@induchopra3014]

If they considered themselves bengalis, why partition happened? They were Muslims first No they were not indians

[@softpick1096]

He has to do something for the fund he received from the jihadis, at least bark

[@Userykp]

​@@induchopra3014 if bangladeshis r bengalis then pakistanis r punjabis -- then whats the need for another country? He is arguing comparing language to country 🙄.

[@buildthemvp]

He should be charged for wasting precious time of the court. Old guy has gone nuts.

[@hiteshahir2671]

This arguments of adv sibbal before CJI shows now he should be retired from his profession.

[@shanu7uday]

7:50 "1971 was second partition of India" सिब्बल बोला 😂😅😂😅😂😅😝🤪😜🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅

[@m.r.r8408]

This man Sibal thinks that we are all fools! He is trying to confuse the justices by mangling the Indian constitution and history!

[@smitaswarup8562]

You do not know, Const is a living one. It is to be studied in context of history and circumstances. You people need to have a civics lesson. Sibal is a grt constl expert.

[@ikp5159]

How will CJ get confused..he will not..he knows Sibal very well

[@udayhotshot]

​@@smitaswarup8562and yet he lost the argument ... you people should understand constitution is the for the people of India not for the people who made decision at 1947 ... if they want to enter into India ... only GOI has the almighty power to decide ... not Sibal or SC its a simple understanding

[@arpanchuddlers]

leave bhai. you can't argue with people who only follow what one book says...@@udayhotshot

[@philominapc7859]

@@ikp5159😂😂😂

[@saimeera3537]

Sir you are enough for us. We don't need enemies outside of India.

[@sbanj]

Don't call him Sir. He don't deserve any respect.

[@diadon5674]

I agree

[@manjulagoel5250]

Who made Sibal a lawyer,he is a mad man

[@BOLLYWOODSMASTI]

भारत में ऐसे कई जयचंद हैं जिन्हें अपनी धरती के प्रति वफादार होने से ज्यादा दूसरों के तलवे चाटने में गर्व होता है।

[@gdjoshijabalpur]

सिब्बल को हिंदू विरोधी और देश विरोधी बयानों के लिये सभी न्यायालयों में क्यों नहीं प्रतिबंधित कर दिया जाना चाहिए।

[@arunaryankavu8298]

He knows this

[@H2B2D]

Court bhi liberalism aur secularism ke naam per Hinduo se bhed-bhaav karta hai.

[@sonagarg2871]

@@H2B2Dसिर्फ़ बीजेपी को वोट दो वो सारा कचरा साफ़ कर देगी ।एकदम सब कुछ वो नहीं कर सकती ,लेकिन अगले पाँच सालो में देश में बड़े बड़े बदलाव होने तय है ।

[@s9820309493]

Need guts or both R one coin ❓

[@tksinha6007]

माननीय टीम के चुनाव माननीय ही करते हैं

[@padminisekhar6070]

Sibal should never be allowed to practice as lawyer.

[@ajaysolanki2497]

😂😂

[@ujjwalrai7517]

Why?

[@SR-ku3ud]

WTF is he saying - 'they were Indians in 1971?????

[@dkm5691]

100% correct. Through out from court Y CJI LISTENING HIS WORD

[@kvrao-ol9fy]

His practice should be cancelled.

[@THERACHITANAND]

Sibbal is using the basic principle of lawyers -" if you can't convince them then confuse them".😂😂😂

[@TouchBillion]

This is not court room, this is lecture hall😂😂 Only lecture , no any questions & answers😂

[@user-qc7fi1ln8t]

These types of hipocratic lawyers are dangerous for our country. He is not a lawyer, but a liar

[@nowwhat6716]

Do U mean cji.they seems to agree at the end.

[@RaviKumar-hy6xe]

bring sudanshu trivedi against sibal. sibal might be moghal son, they forget to take him, now lets hindhus become shivaji, and send him out of india. partition was done on religion india is hindhu country.

[@ashmax3411]

When u have traitors within ur own country then u dont need any enemy from outside...sibbal is an example

[@Shivamsharma_cgly]

Mat bhulo Electoral Bond ko inhone hi expose kiya hai.

[@aadi_WNL]

@@Shivamsharma_cgly to hindu ko target karne ka hak mil gya kya ise fir??

[@radhikakumar2331]

Exactly!!

[@samarsengupta8205]

​@@Shivamsharma_cgly 47% BJP other have 53% so if it's unethical then why not other refused all donation? BJP national party have 6k+ cr and 2nd one who in only one state have they have 1.6k+ cr. Before it cash was scam brother.

[@kishorkotbage]

👌👌👌👌very well said 👍👍👍

[@NITINKUMAR-zx8ug]

"Demographic change cannot alter culture" SERIOUSLY? ---shocked by this arguement!!!

[@Zyt60]

I never thought in "supreme court" also lawyers present blabbered answers as we do in viva when not prepared

[@akshuchahal9064]

😂😂😂

[@Kafir_Hindu]

My lord, Sibbal has gone mad, his place is in mental asylum and not in the court.

[@salamindia5148]

Sanghis, Bajrang Dal, Moblyncher, Tadipaar have place in court!!!

[@Kafir_Hindu]

@@salamindia5148 yes, and the butchers of humanity who kill others in name of BHAICHARA behind the bars of the prison 😂🤔😂

[@iamYashodeep]

​@@salamindia5148religion of pieces spreading piece in Russia..

[@Aayu124]

Ambedkar ji ne kaha h ki ysdi bharat kabhi hindu rastra nahi ban sakta...yadi esa hota h to wo desh ka durbhagya hoga Kyuki Hindu dharm me lengik bhedbhav jatigat bhedbhav h samanta nahi h Samvidhan nirmata ambedkar ji ❤❤

[@kelano728]

​@@salamindia5148rohinga😂

[@HarshVerma-tm5od]

And that person was once law minister of india

[@liveandletlive9046]

It was a bad joke for our country. He spoiled everything with his dirty mind

[@sobhanapm4617]

😂😂

[@RaviSingh-jo6pr]

Even he himself know that he is beating about bush. But he want to continue to dabate on topic and money will continue to flow in form of his fees 😂

[@induchopra3014]

Shocking

[@diadon5674]

What a nightmare that must be !!

[@user-xd4vj8bj2d]

जिस देश मे ऐसे वकिल हो उसे दुश्मन की जरूरत है।

[@jajabor3665]

#Kickout #Sibbal

[@user-zo7lu8rn1s]

The supreme court is very patient to hear Kapil Sibal

[@nareshsharma6526]

Both are part of the eco system established by Congress and left.

[@janvijaysingh2692]

Yes they of course, they should... And after all, Sibal's making valid points that the preservation and safeguard of a regional culture from immigration is not a right in India (although this is the guy who used to vouch and simp for the Article 370) My point is, the parliament should make a new right for preservation of culture... Tab dekhte hai ye kya bolte hai 🙃

[@hrishabhjoshi5847]

​@@janvijaysingh2692He isn't making valid points, after 1947 there was Pakistan and India. After 1971 there was Pakistan, Bangladesh and India so those people are of different nationality not Indians.

[@janvijaysingh2692]

@@hrishabhjoshi5847 I don't think so you even watched the video. What I'm talking about is migration within India. As such, people of other regions of India move into a state, thus gaining a stake in the say in the state's politics and policies. This also conflicts with the predominant culture in those states, as immigrants bring in their own culture. And we Indians are tought in 7th or 8th grade, about the right to migration within the country... Some north eastern states do have 6th Schedule, but several others don't. Even States like Ladakh, J&K, Uttarakhand, Himanchal don't have any such safeguard. And thus Sibal's right in saying that there's no legal grounds for a state (most states) or its community to plead to court about preventing influx of migrants from any part of India (though he's pretty wrong when saying that Bangladeshis have a right to migrate within India+Bangladesh, its pretty funny😂)

[@christianabhishek647]

@@janvijaysingh2692 The right to the preservation of culture must not ever be recognised by any sound nation, history would always vote against it.

[@srikrishnauniversalvlogs]

This type of lawyers very dangerous to country....

[@shasha2022-bo5yw]

He is good but not sangi

[@sigma_sniper6141]

​@@shasha2022-bo5yw he is traitor Mf

[@Bishnu_Deb]

@@shasha2022-bo5yw he is not sanghi and he is supported by anti Hindu mindset. This is a shameful fact.

[@riturajsanketh7635]

What have you understood by the discussion adhe bhakt

[@faizanshaikh2025]

Kyu ki yeh lawyer muslim se nafrat nhi krte na. Jo muslim ko support karega wo dangerous. Jo muslim se nafrat karega wo accha

[@nikhileshmanchi2196]

all supreme court hearings should be put in public domain each and every hearing

[@anshuraj3628]

I have to watch this in full video for better understanding.

[@hradaykantsaraiya5808]

I am an Indian. I became American citizen . I surrender my Indian passport . Now I want to come back to India. Now I will have to apply for Indian citizenship. Then it is up to Indian government to decide whether to give me citizenship or not. Same thing apply to all other foreigners.

[@Rahul_Singh100]

Its not the same thing... You left the country ... The people being denied citizenship in the region of Bengal underwent partition and bore becoming refugee against their will.

[@Rahul_Singh100]

If you dont have common sense enough to comprehenx what is being discussed, dont blabber ur mouth.

[@kamalrathod25]

It's different because many could not come to India during partition... India's partition was declared overnight and many could not come back to India. It is accepted by Congress themselves it was a blunder ...MMS himself said in parliament we must do something for the minority in Pakistan...congress sometime forgets what they spoke in past 😅

[@Sakshameditz27]

​​@@Rahul_Singh100 In constitution of India it is written that people that came during partition can have refugees citizenship but in this remark by sibal he state that India partition took place on 14 August and only Pakistan got independent but Bangladesh citizens can have right to move to Indian which is wrong it is written in treaty that Bangladesh will join Pakistani which contradiction the statement by sibbal

[@indianhistoryarchaeology]

@@Sakshameditz27 Bangladesh became East Pakistan on 14 August, 1947 and the Partition of Bengal was possibly worse than that of Punjab. Trainloads of Hindus were being massacred and many were too scared to cross the border as news of violence in West Bengal was equally bad. Also, as in Sindh some were too poor to even attempt to walk across the land and cross the border. But Sibal is deliberately muddling the facts by saying that Bangladesh became an independent country in 1971 and therefore was part of united India before that. During this period we did get a large influx of migrants from East Pakistan who were escaping the Pakistan army and they got assimilated among the "minority" community in India.

[@a.p.rajupillai7675]

he never argues with legal methods, he only confuses and irreverent things and make people to forget the original case

[@rajendraprajapati8977]

भारत को दुश्मनों की क्या ज़रूरत हैं, दुश्मन तो हमारे देश मैं ही पल रहे हैं 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@user-zt5si1lc4j]

Sibal is very confident that We bhartiye people are fools, With the elected govts of Congress in the past he settled this idea in his mind 😮

[@induchopra3014]

He thinks he alone knows history. Which Bangladeshis consider himself indian? Zero

[@bharatakhand-qr1kb]

I belong to the same ethnicity of Mr. Sibbal and Indian also like sibbal. So I am son of Mr Sibbal. Kindly give me your whole wealth now bcz I am your legal heir😊

[@zeroalpha4818]

perfect point

[@karthikpriyabalakrishnan2551]

Perfect superb sibal should know this 👏👏👏👌👌👌👌👌

[@actualangel5133]

😂😂😂😂😂😂 Wonderful point.👌👌👌

[@No-Homo]

Logic 🔥🔥

[@hemantachandra6962]

Rightly-put

[@Krthivj12]

Should send him to out of country to place were his is talking abt..

[@pn0409]

Lately Kapil Sibbal developed a habbit of taking every case to Supreme Court, whether constitutional or unconstitutional, and waste courts time. He should be barred from practicing and must be thrown out of govt residence too.

[@raptor6104]

He is getting paid by Pappu

[@n.s.karanth1381]

Yes, he cultivated a strong affiliation with Supreme Court The Court can't function without pleader like Sibal and Singhvi, the collective charm, mindset has come to this point

[@saniaparveen7957]

Hindus also wasting time of court by bringing unnecessary allegations of existence of hindu temples every where, we have better things to look into, but no according to your shraddha every Muslim house are built on a temple 👌👌

[@ptbb23]

Why is supreme court entertaining these cases. Tells a lot about CJI himself

[@raptor6104]

@@ptbb23 Bro...if he is against these type of time wasting cases....Pappus will cry and again "protest" again across India saying democracy died because no one is fighting for their illiterate views

[@m.k.basanth168]

CJI shud have thrown this Sibal endemic out of the court. Listening to this man's blasphemy is a waste of court's time.

[@Shubham-pr9cq]

Bhai sahab don't forget about direct action day Pakistan ka matlab kya la ilaha illallah

[@vedprakashsonthalia4490]

CJI and sibbal are birds of the same feathers. Any thing that appears otherwise is smokescreen to hoodwink viewers to affect difference of opinion

[@arifabd]

Are you sure you don't like him because of logic, or because of inexplicable hatred towards a group ?

[@Shubham-pr9cq]

Bhai dekh simple baat hai please look at the electoral capacity of Muslim league when it got elected in 1940s 98.4 % vote Then then their claims which got converted into mosque Then dear majority areas where they have their own personal management In three districts of India there are no Hindu and Hindu rituals are allowed Then I don't know where are you from but if you are from Bengal then you must have remembered that how the Sultan of Bengal played with virgin women The same way sandesh Khali happened Kerala is the very secular state that because they celebrate olam you have to eat beef When people are doing it then it shows the problem within it I am not saying Muslim the bad but 85% of the population of Muslims want their laws Then how they throw a stone that Hindu festivals So if you think that then why should not be take Pakistan Afghanistan and Afghanistan Muslim and Bangladesh Muslims this is the same reason because they have separated from a bike killing our people Hindu Shahi rulers of Afghanistan Sindhi and Punjabi of Pakistan Bangladeshi Hindu the treating like dust Sorry but we have lo st so much of a territory we don't want to lose another

[@shubhasahai6933]

@@arifabdgive 10 honest reson not to doubt you people. Book teaching everybody knows truth.

[@yugandharabhandarkar9829]

Why is Sibal wasting precious time of Honorable Supreme Court?

[@monadesai7605]

In 1971, it was the First partition of Pakistan.

[@naiksa1]

I have never seen a hypocrite lawyer like Sibal, he change his argument as per his suitability. Ask for J&K he will change immediately.

[@mowgli7_]

Advocacy is literally representing your client’s stance.

[@shubhamhirave3772]

​@@mowgli7_😂

[@Delllatitude7490]

@@mowgli7_ Client's stance? here he is trying to deny the Petitionare by using his twisted logic of, Assam should not blame it's dilution of culture on demographic change while in Art 370 case, he said demographic change will destroy thr J&K culture. it's hypocracy more than anything else

[@mowgli7_]

@@Delllatitude7490 he's arguing for the side he is representing. That is what advocacy is. Exactly how A criminal lawyer may represent prosecution in one case and the defendant in the other. He does not become a hypocrite for using the same logic to his own end.

[@indiaslawforensicadv.trish4839]

Honorable CHIEF JUSTICE IS LISTENING AND RIGHTLY POINTED OUT EVERY POINT OF SIBBAL SIR...SUCH AN EXAMPLE OF PRACTICING LAW AND JUDICIARY TAKING THE STAND ...SATYAMEVA JAYATE

[@himanshukashyap8763]

Esa h to cji h cm arresting ke case ke sath etni laperwahi kyun ki. Esi female judge ko case diya jo gujrat aur pm modi se related h. Akhir h to ye bhi pichle 4 cji ke kafi close... Ab yakin nhi Kiya ja sakta sc highcourt per bhi ..... Na election commission per.. democracy to khatam ho hi gai samjo.

[@kartikhazarika3101]

@@himanshukashyap8763Aaaaa

[@ramsajiwandubey5355]

In SC Sibbal Will Not Win The Case CAAWill Reman Continu

[@devanshkhandelwal7749]

​@@himanshukashyap8763Ed ne supreme Cort me evidences submit kiye hai and Ed 14 days ke liye cm ko custoday me rather saktii haii Read about it.......

[@VijaykumarSharma-nv8di]

DO YOU KNOW ZINHAS 16 AUG 46 DIRECT ACTION DAY THESE IN BLACK COATS ARE ADDRESDING CONCERN IN FAVOUR OF ZINHAS DIRECT ACTION DAY SIBBAL WAS PART OF CONGRESS THAT DESTROYED ASSAM CULTURE BY IMPORTING FROM BANHKADESH FOR VOTE BANK

[@kunnathramankutty1786]

Article 29 for Indians residing in India and not to the intruders from other nations who has no right to claim that they have a right to ljve in this country.

[@natarajanb1905]

Sibbal is arguing exactly the opposite of what he argued in Art.370. At that time he argued that Kashmir has its own culture language etc which shouldn't be diluted and now he says states shouldn't object if their demography changes.

[@secularmama]

He is doing his job , he paid for that

[@purabi123]

That is what lawyers do.

[@secularmama]

@@purabi123 Yes, Lawyers are only ones who can professionaly lie legally.

[@novosti4411]

Absolutely brilliant point Mr. Natarajanb1905

[@godinallcreatures3539]

Sibal misled Congress on 2G,Educatioal policy and now CAA, dont waste court time and confuse the issue just to prolonge.

[@gopalnarayan1398]

I never understood about such people who argued on demographic of other countries but not our country.

[@anilladhelloo4049]

He must not be permitted to Fight cases in Indian courts.

[@nshivashankar1533]

Honourable justice is rightly questioning They can migrate only in India, not from other country….

[@Tearsofsoil]

I am happy all of this is now live and we can listen and know what goes in the minds of these people.. sic

[@goo-lamokadoctor181]

Congress created Pakistan for Muslims in India. And now they are saying ,Muslims had a choice to go to Pak but they stayed. The Truth is Pakistan was created after overwhelming vote in support of Partition by Indian Muslims in all muslim constituencies , and when they voted ,the borders were not decided.. So every Indian Muslim voted with expectation that his area will come under Pakistan .

[@akghoshghosh5150]

It's really sad to listen to Mr Sibel. How could our judiciary kept listening. He should have been snapped. He Spoke nonsense only.

[@ПлатонУченик]

Although I am with you on the broader issue, I have to point out that your suggestion is absolutely undemocratic. In a fair justice system, everyone is entitled to be heard, which means both the right and the wrong and a judgment must be passed declaring one side or the other triumphant and founded on reasoning. What would be the point of a system wherein only those whom you think are right get to speak and not the ones who are wrong? Then there would not remain any distinction before the eyes of the public, "usko bolne mat do" is not justice.

[@cheramanirumborai7181]

Coz we Indians love empty talk!

[@aruhik]

Question: how far will u go to be labelled anti hindu and anti national? Kapil sibal: yes.

[@angshuhaldar5473]

this is the case of optimum utilisation of courts time

[@bjhonusa]

Still after 1947 and Before 1971 , Bangladeshi was Indian. And CJI still hearing this nonsense. 😢😢😢😢😢

[@rjv238]

same Kapil Sibal was arguing against abolition of article 370 citing Kashmir is not fully an integral part of India.

[@mysteryruler0]

These wolfs are highly paid by anti-india elements paise ko liye yeh apni biwi ko bech de desh kya chij hai.. when you're taking about patriotism these wolfs never bark,

[@tarapadapyne6779]

Every time he loses, but he keeps fighting against India, to keep his job intact.

[@mahendrakvuppala3047]

Really a shameless person he is - in spite of his own family being victims of hatred present in that community , he supports them !

[@shekarv7528]

What is the profession of a lawyer, where he lives, thank God our supreme court.

[@sreebaskarn3864]

In family partition if two houses are there , in joint family all were living in one house . Once the partition takes place , one family got the existing house should only stay and the one got another house should only go their house . They cannot say I lived in that house on the day of partition , so I will live here and ask for equal right . Is it right my learned lawyer Mr Sibal sir ?

[@venkateshnatarajan2941]

How is this guy even a lawyer..

[@Avant-garde1611]

Why is sibal even allowed in court, such a wastage of court's time😂

[@ravipambungal5572]

Correct he is speaking stupid arguments wasting court's time.

[@vijayapant1644]

EXACTLY SO!

[@duryodhanbardhan7345]

Judge Saheb donot allow Sibal to court.

[@raihanulislam7097]

Listening skills ✅ and speaking skill of CJI 🔥🔥

[@utpalroy1972]

The problem with this country,it too diverse.Barring south India,where education level is high& there is a sence of unity.Education have inculcated of feeling of pride& value addition.The intelligent adminstration has ushered a better understanding of good governance.There is sence of affinity.The afrosaid highlights are sadly lacking in rest of the country.thus given too an un qualified religiosity.The education level is poor.Thus the misconceptation on progressive lite is missing.There is a sence of insecurities pre vails.Thus the depednese on multipule gods& goddess.Hence the polarization is easitest. Therefore belief on Hindutva.Blind hero worshipping has culminated their backwardness. S S

[@manognyak6474]

​​@@utpalroy1972don't talk nonsense when you don't have any idea about South India..

[@AkshayKumar-oh7mr]

​@@manognyak6474😊👏

[@bharatiadhatrao8696]

I was shacked with the kapil sibbal arguments, when he said they means Bangladeshi were Indians. Even the CJI Raised the same question. Before 1971, it was east Pakistan, and not India.,which was partioned in 1947. Immigrants before 1971 are migrated from east Pakistan, then how can they be Indians. On 16th Dec 1971 Bangladesh was formed.

[@tarunmedi]

Sibballs argument is gold ..and very deep...cji initially didn't get it..

[@user-zf4un4mx2l]

Fool sibal may argue that there's no Hindus ever

[@bhavishdhankar1943]

it was east pakistan

[@humbleh5085]

How can sibbal say that before Bangladesh formed, they were Indians. They were East Pakistanis before becoming Bangladeshis.

[@tarunmedi]

@@humbleh5085 they were forced to be East Pakistani...when India and Pakistan seperated their was great influx of Bengali speaking Hindus as well as Muslims from east pakistan...but government was forced to issue permit for Muslims coming to India ..only 2000 permits were released per month ..while before those permits 25000+ Muslims were moving to India...while Hindus had no restrictions...they all were Bengali first ... and they didn't know Urdu ...one reason why east and Pakistan seperated was because of imposition of Urdu over east pakistan giving people of west pakistan unnecessary advantage...thats another reason why South India opposes imposition of Hindi over them.

[@BOLLYWOODSMASTI]

किसी भी पक्ष द्वारा मनोनित राज्यसभा सांसद, कोर्ट की पैरवी केसे कर सकते है। ये बात समझ के बाहर है।

[@user-pp5xy9lm8l]

And he has no shame

[@vpraman7953]

Migration within country is a fundamental right says Sibal. But he was also arguing for restoration of Art 370 and 35 A.

[@user-ti4hh2qz9s]

What is wrong in it.... Abrrogation of article was illegal...

[@Lax448]

Supreme court said it's legal..😅😂

[@urrasscal8380]

@@user-ti4hh2qz9s foreign rreligion called iislamb is responsible for division of iindia therefore this foreign idealogy should be banned from iindia.

[@shekharavhad7687]

Had abrogation of 370 been illegal then supreme court would have said so.@@user-ti4hh2qz9s

[@EMTMZ]

Mad can say any thing, goat can eat any thing. Never mind.

[@debajyotinath5021]

Good arguments and discussions. After Sibal and his arguments are proved wrong, the anti CAA brigade will not have anything left to say legally.

[@dewasravi]

He is born to support onky the wrongdoers...!! If any anti national thing happens immediately sibal, abishek singhvi will jump to support them.. enemies within the country are more dangerous than from outside..

[@APS2803]

कपिल सिब्बल साहब, बस कीजिए अब।आराम कीजिए राज्य सभा में।प्रैक्टिस व्रैक्टिस छोड़िए।😢

[@jituladhikary2227]

sibal openly lies in court too. no accountability. why? does perjury law exits in India?

[@SaveManWoman]

You think those corrupt political crooks would stand by and not call him ? You just don’t like facts.

[@akghoshghosh5150]

It's surprising that Sibel tried to fool all the judiciary and sad part t

[@nareshsharma6526]

And the judiciary is trying to be a fool.😜bcoz both are part of the eco system established by Congress and Leftists.

[@sadanandanvayalveetil7132]

Send him out of the court for telling lies on the name of arguing certain plea in the highest court of India. He is greedy of money. He is raising his voice to CJI at times with impatience.

[@anilladhelloo4049]

The court must ask where did his forefathers came from? .

[@djbabudharmi371]

Sibal wasted SC time in article 370. Now here too in CAA is wasting. How CJI is permitted such arguments to take place? He should be barred from bar

[@FirstLast-vr5gh]

Bar council and not from bar. Woh bar, bar bar jaye. Hamen kaa haani?!

[@brindarao29]

CJI's patience perhaps to show the public that learned fools do exist and that too within the Bar Limits.

[@shanmugasundaramthangavel2859]

A total argument with history, law and constitution. A lesson for lawyers, who want to come-up in their career

[@radhikadhiwar715]

Yes

[@zukazuka485]

Should take a class to the MP & MINISTER'S OF THE ALL PARTY

[@josephdsouza1515]

CJI is taking care what he talks and what he answers because he has to report to the PM while SIBAL has a point in what he talks... both of them should be for the people...of the people...and by the people (irrespective of the caste and religion) . and NOT of the PM... it's very important..

[@vnwbhai]

😅😅😅

[@kiranar8303]

​@@josephdsouza1515 for the people of nation... And also accepting an majority religion from neighbour, is an foolishness foe sure. Or let there be a law... that land, more tax and their surety should be given by the people who support them especially the majority religion from neighbour. If this happen not even sibal accept them

[@varun8650]

It was a mistake that complete muslims were not forced out of India after they took out indian land for muslims.

[@user-ff9xq6rv2x]

CLAIM CAN'T BE JUSTIFIED AFTER PARTITION, BEFORE 1971 BANGLADESHI WERE PAKISTANI NOT INDIANS

[@solusindica89]

While acknowledging the historical context of migrations pre-1947 and the subsequent legal framework, it's important to consider the nuanced perspectives encapsulated within the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and constitutional articles. The migratory patterns from 1914 and the conception of India as a cohesive entity before partition indeed underscore a certain fluidity in national identity. However, it's also crucial to delve into the intricacies of post-partition legal amendments and the formation of new nation-states like Bangladesh in 1971. The dynamic nature of legal interpretations, especially in matters of migration and citizenship, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of constitutional amendments and international legal precedents. This complexity is not a reflection of the intelligence or acumen of legal authorities but rather a testament to the multifaceted nature of jurisprudence and historical evolution. Therefore, when examining migratory patterns and their legal implications, it's imperative to navigate through the layers of legal frameworks with due diligence and a nuanced approach. This ensures a holistic understanding of the complexities involved, avoiding oversimplification and acknowledging the legal expertise and considerations at play in the highest courts of India. The historical backdrop highlights ongoing migrations since 1914, which can be viewed as a natural phenomenon. Prior to 1947, individuals were identified as Indians, enjoying the liberty to relocate within the country. This freedom of movement was enshrined in the legal framework, permitting Indians to settle in any part of India until August 15, 1947. Post-partition, individuals retained the right to migrate under the Indian Constitution, thereby maintaining their Indian identity. The creation of Bangladesh in 1971, marking its separation from Pakistan, further underscores the application of relevant laws to its populace. These legal principles were subsequently amended in 1978 to accommodate evolving circumstances. It's essential to grasp this context to avoid misconceptions regarding the competency of esteemed legal authorities such as the Chief Justices and lawyers at India's apex court.

[@skabc1926]

I have saw once his brother interview who was former diplomat of our country who is completely opposite of him knows the importance of national security but this guy such a disgrace

[@kamalakant477]

सिब्बल, सिंगवी, प्रशांत भूषण ऐसे वकीलों पार जांच एजेंसीओं को नजर रखने की जरुरत है की इन लोगों को फंडिंग कौन करता है, जो हमेशा आतंकवादी, माउबादी ओर देश विरोधी लोगों का ही मुकदमा लड़ता है l

[@rajendrabaria5672]

Right

[@user-fp3sp9iw5c]

इन लोगों ने वह शिक्षा हासिल की है जो आपको जिंदगी में कभी नहीं मिली। ये लोग संविधान का पालन करना जानते हैं, आपके तरह नहीं जो किसी एक पार्टी के विचार से प्रभावित होकर देश को धर्म के नाम पर बांटे।

[@pankajverma5320]

In ko jaha Paisa jyada milta hai ye waha khadey ho jatey hain aur Funding kin key paas jyada hai ye sab ko maloom hai.

[@pankajverma5320]

​@@user-fp3sp9iw5c Aisi hi Shiksha Gandhi Nahru aur Jinnah ko mili thi jis ki wajah sey Lakho log marey gayey. Neta Ji, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Udham Singh, Madan Lal Dhingra, Verr Savarkar aur Sardar Patel ney aisi mahaan Shiksha nahi li isi liye unhoney Desh key liye apna jeevan arpan kar diya.

[@pankajverma5320]

​@@user-fp3sp9iw5c Partition Religion key basis par hua tha, is ki demand Muslims ney ki thi aur Pakistan sey Minorities ko khatam karney ka kaam turant hi shuru kar diya tha aur ab yahi kaam Bangladesh mey cbal raha hai is liye faltu ki Shiksha aur Samvidhan ka rona roney ki jaroorat nahi hai. Abhi kitney Article hain pooch liya to batti gul ho jayegi.

[@krishkrish2545]

Enemies are living in our country and how these Judges were allowing Sibal to talk and listening for his infactual conversation...?

[@girishbhavsar]

2:47 The same is applicable to Kashmir also.

[@bibspinku163]

I am neither a law student nor understand the practice of law but the way the Argument is being held and the decent exchange of words between MR Sibal and Hon. CJI gives me thought to my own attitude.Like how we can present our thought point and Argument in our daily life when we are in Public forum.Lots of learning on History ,language, law and constitution from this argument.Kudos to the Law Chakra team for bringing this out.

[@dpvasanthaprema629]

Yes Bro….. amazing

[@gopalprabhu5502]

It s truely told that law is an ass

[@swapnilpawar8015]

It's the Supreme Court of India. Were you expecting Bollywood like court proceedings?

[@loveearthly]

Don’t be naive. The CJI is listening patiently to a senile lawyer claiming that East Pakistanis were Indians between day of Independence & 1971 war.

[@bibspinku163]

​@@loveearthly He claimed that the minority linguistic groups living in East Pakistan were originally from India, as they belonging to the undivided Indian subcontinent and thats the truth.

[@trippernomad]

इतना ही प्यार था तो देश के टुकड़े क्यों किए ??

[@sria8163]

5.54... point well made

[@masoomajay]

Not expected from Kapil Sibbal like lawyer to argue in such an illogical manner. After 1947, East Pakistani' were not Indian Citizen.