CA v Robert Durst Murder Trial Day 38 2015 Interview With Prosecutor John Lewin Part 2

[@tootsla1252]

Durst is toast. Him taking the stand is the dumbest thing he will ever do. Lewin’s cross may seem all over the place, but he knows exactly what he’s doing. My money is on Lewin for the conviction .

[@speaklifegardenhomesteadpe8783]

🤞

[@joyciejd9673]

I would not tell Durst about my dogs.

[@lexkaye1989]

Lewin is brilliant

[@personofinterest8731]

So if you want something, you can just take it from a store without paying because you're not going to stand in a line? So he was taught that's OK? Maybe his father did that? Asperger people I know, know that's wrong. He's entitled.

[@lovepet4565]

I knew a very wealthy dad owned an oil co He Got to be elderly and if the bill Did not come fast enough in a restaurant hed get up leave lol

[@toriesepahmd6468]

My take away from this interview is that the DA is very difficult to listen to. At times, he seems to seek approval and validation from Durst himself, “I’m the reason they’ve opened the case in NY, not Jarecki” “Do you know why I didn’t call [sic]?” Then tells Bob in a ‘I’m so bright’ tone, “because they would have called you”. Just say what you need to say without asking a rhetorical question. So much of this recording is about the DA talking about himself. And as a psychiatrist, I’m not pleased to hear Lewin define autism spectrum disorders and conclude that bc someone can exhibit wit at times, that would preclude a diagnosis on the spectrum. Also, why would he ask Bob about what defines autism spectrum disorders/Aspergers’? As though patients who have this diagnosis are going to say, “yes, that’s me!’ Or that the patient having insight into that diagnosis is a criteria for diagnosis. How simplistic and untrue. That whole segment only adds to the stereotypes about people with autism spectrum disorder whom DA Lewin has zero credentials to diagnose or rule out a diagnosis of irrespective of bob durst.

[@hubbleandtrouble]

Agreed. I detest Lewin's ego.

[@susanswift5890]

That’s a police defective asking him questions. Not a DA.

[@toriesepahmd6468]

@@susanswift5890 I’m referring to the parts involving Lewin….I know who he is and I think anyone who has been watching knows when he is talking. I’ve listened to that whole interview. Its up somewhere on KZbin or online.

[@lexkaye1989]

Lewin is brilliant, durst is guilty. Lewin didn't diagnose him, the experts defined it.

[@lexkaye1989]

That's DA Lewin asking questions.

[@pippadot679]

So confusing following this trial from the very start. Today the 4 videos are 2 on Law & Crime channel, the other 2 on Law & Crime Channel B. There has to be something I’m not understanding 🤷🏻‍♀️? Durst is too much that comment people on the street trust me & I trust them. He’s so full of himself.

[@joyciejd9673]

I just wrote this feedback on one of the feeds (somewhere). The live feeds are confusing enough but it is ridiculous to not take care to label the videos (once no longer “live”) properly for continuity. (I had no idea there is a channel “A” or “B” but that probably explains why I keep finding what I think are “new” videos to find that I had already seen them)

[@sherrillsturm7240]

Been waiting for this today. But, I can't make out broadcast words of some people.

[@susanswift5890]

This is a prior recording of when Durst spike to the police. This is not the prosecutor asking him these questions in the courtroom. (That hasn’t happened in the trial yet.) I think the detective has really done his homework & he’s a brilliant interrogator.

[@susanswift5890]

* spoke

[@lexkaye1989]

It is prosecutor John Lewin interviewing Durst in Louisiana in 2015 with police present.

[@kolchek1000]

Booooooob, NEVER speak to the police!!!! His lawyers must be wanting to strangle him. 🙄

[@laradesautel3013]

He forgot he’s NOT actually talking to a “fan” and he’s trying to impress the prosecutor. Ugh…

[@carebunny7545]

cant see who's talking

[@lovepet4565]

Its durst and lewellen the DA

[@lexkaye1989]

Get better, longer mics for witness box!!!

[@tracywendover8104]

Defense yapping about not being able to afford a lawyer one would be appointed to him they are grasping at straws this is the same lawyer from texas.

[@suzanneschmidt3755]

My son has aspergers and when Bob talks about what he supposed to do or say it is because people with Aspergers are constantly asking themselves what normal people would do because they cant read cues or social situations. It is clear he has it, not that it excuses what he did.

[@steamedhamlet]

No he's just a narcissistic psycho

[@reneesajous6333]

Lewin is all over the place. He can hardly finish a complete thought before moving to a different thought or question. It’s very annoying because some of the questions he starts to ask are actually very important but he moves on and doesn’t come back to them. I don’t like saying this because I know Durst is guilty.

[@maisam.1663]

I really like Lewin but agree with that habit of forgetting the original path and it IS quite frustrating 🙈

[@jackattack_8]

He's doing it on purpose. Bob is no dummy. He wants Bob to think he doesn't know what he's doing and that he practically worships him. It's all a ploy. But I hope Bob gets off again, he's hilarious.

[@deborahparsons5439]

Lawyers move all over the place to catch the suspect in a lie.

[@speaklifegardenhomesteadpe8783]

@@jackattack_8 u sure?

[@jackattack_8]

@@speaklifegardenhomesteadpe8783 About what?

[@lexkaye1989]

Bob falls right into the trap of thr DDA

[@lexkaye1989]

45:32 busted in a lie

[@TheDonHeron]

1:36:35

[@lexkaye1989]

41:45 busted