LAWYER: How to Stop Police From Spying on You with Drones

[@hamptonlawfirm]

🌏Get NordVPN 2Y plan + 4 months extra + up to 20Gb Saily data here ➼ nordvpn.com/hamptonlaw It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee!

[@captintinsmith3774]

This channel is HEAVILY Censored..... ☹️ In The Friends of Voltaire, Hall wrote: "I Disapprove of What You Say, but I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It" ~ Evelyn Beatrice Hall ~ "This quotation - which is sometimes misattributed to Voltaire himself - is often cited to describe the Principle of Freedom of Speech."

[@jupitercyclops6521]

(12 min in)- "Here's the bad news" Where was the good news? There was the minute or so about the couple with a privacy fence. 2 o 3 min of comercial & 13 min of rights violating rulings, policies, procedures, practices, and even laws!!!!! Are we (by we I mean yall)so used to rights violations being the norm, we don't even question obvipus rights and or oath violations

[@3rdreichball525]

The answer is yes you can. Just don't get caught

[@BorderGuards]

So they can fly 1 foot above the ground?

[@Bambihunter1971]

Beautiful segue to the Nord VPN commercial. 🙂

[@SHANECatLovinActivistHistorian]

and yet we see the cops go nuts on people who are out with a camera

[@raswerdelad]

Cuz they bay-bays.

[@abcdefg54321x]

Ftp

[@thecreamyone3606]

Word

[@MokaneMalone-z2d]

​​@@raswerdeladno, their baby's. We're all children kid.😂heehee lol I'm messing with u

[@deanne8344]

@@SHANECatLovinActivistHistorian it's do as I say not as I do, we the people should have more rights with the drones. There's no telling how much evidence they use against you that came from spying with a drone they sure don't say we gathered evidence with our drone !

[@ronalddaub9740]

Yes to all they will abuse it in every way they can

[@dawnhoughton4533]

And even in ways we can't imagine yet.

[@craigrobbins3540]

Yes they will! And we are suppose to believe they didn’t use drones at the Trump rally ?

[@ColonelSanders-xo9hp]

​@@dawnhoughton4533they already are.

[@deanne8344]

@ronalddaub9740 I agree they already push the law as far as they can . When your charged it's how they phrase it on how bad the charge is.one word could get you 10yrs

[@Paul__FC]

Sounds like warrantless surveillance 1:19

[@mikemann1960]

Reverse Ono is except able.

[@mikemann1960]

Reverse Ono is acceptable.

[@mikemann1960]

KZbin is mad at me and keeps deleting my comments. Why, because I don't support their shareholders. My military friends will assist me from here on out to stop this. They allow speech to spread that I 💯 % support and have never been relieved of my 5th general order.

[@Mark-s6m2z]

It is

[@mauricio-wq5lu]

Checks and balances has almost gone out the door.

[@ZombiePanda1776]

They write checks and we get stuck with the balance

[@mauricio-wq5lu]

@@ZombiePanda1776 True

[@MMPCTV]

All these neet exceptions were made by a conservative supreme court, including qualified immunity.

[@Dazdigo]

I can see the cops landing these drones on private property and using that as an excuse to trespass to receive them.

[@TheCaptainSlappy]

I hear you have a gas leak on your property right next to your meth lab, Daz. Public safety and all that, you know.

[@-._--_.-]

​@@TheCaptainSlappy Excuse me it ain't no meth lab officer, them white crystals right there is high grade white phosphorus.

[@emilyfeagin2673]

I have giant pine trees. If it lands in there, they had better be able to climb up and get it

[@TheCaptainSlappy]

@@MCcadet04 Please do. And remember...felons can't own guns to shoot down drones monitoring your fenty operation.

[@texasrigged5875]

The fact they use taxidermied birds is crazy work

[@dawnhoughton4533]

As a nude sunbather in my fenced in back yard and have had government drones fly over, I DO consider this an invasion of my privacy.

[@nxsecuresucks]

If flying over 400 ft and is approved by the local air traffic controller, it'll legal. Since it is illegal to use those over 400ft, it is against the law. This KZbinr is clueless on actual laws. He's talking about a subject that he knows noting about.

[@puckg2454]

So, uh ... where do ya live...? 😅 😮

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

I can understand your feelings but at the same time unless your property is extremely large, people from outside your property could look in and see you as well. If there's a house/building next to yours somebody could sit up on the roof or a balcony all day and observe what's going on in the area, including your sunbathing. You would feelI invaded but legally it wouldn't be an invasion.

[@punktalley]

If you can be see from public you need to put your clothes back on.

[@dawnhoughton4533]

@@punktalley lol it's a private backyard with privacy 8 ft fencing. Only way to see is overhead. Which the drone went right over me and paused. Unacceptable.

[@fryguy714]

If you give the authorities an inch they will take a mile absolutely not they should not be able to do this it's basically illegal search and seizure know where they season anything no but they're on your property with the camera and that is illegal search they're searching your property with a camera and that is illegal

[@Gr8fullyDeadHead]

When you give authority an inch they become a ruler.

[@BenEthridge]

​@@Gr8fullyDeadHead; YUP been telling people that for 50 years

[@tarpanc34]

best grow your weed inside for now on...... like the hydroponics ppl do...lol

[@TinaMarie869]

​@@tarpanc34I thought weed was legal now. I don't use it my brain doesn't need any help being dumber 😂😂

[@roberttharalson3172]

Okay, we can't shoot down a drone, but is it possible to nondestructively blind it with a high wattage spot light? Modern CMOS light gathering arrays are not prone to burnout like the previous vidicon tubes, so there is little chance of damage, and if you project light spectrum from far ultraviolet to low infrared it would saturate the imaging sensor, effectively blinding it. This would be especially effective in municipalities using drones not registered with the FAA as they could not charge someone with, say, obstruction, without revealing the illegal drone's use. Even if they are registered you are not required to assist in an investigation and it could be argued that blinding it amounts to preventing unwarranted invasion of privacy. In effect, you are creating a "light fence" that the drone cannot see over.

[@BenEthridge]

I like your thinking

[@pacificostudios]

Sure, that's fine. Unlike the radio spectrum, there are no laws against shining lights. Moreover, since you aren't shining the laser at a human eye, using a green laser to permanently damage a flying camera should be lawful. I would argue that damaging the camera is not damaging the aircraft, since a drone with no camera can still fly.

[@Keepskatin]

How did you learn about the secrets of infrared, and stop giving the info away so openly.

[@HEATHENBCE]

​@pacificostudios SCOTUS has ruled on shining lights at cameras, but it's against law enforcement on civilians that get violented multiple times daily.

[@FallingStar1080]

​@@Keepskatinsilence peasant knowledge is power

[@God-rn3ck]

What if I try to spy on police departments like this?

[@Isaac_132]

You'll be arrested faster than you can say "I can't breeve!"

[@puckg2454]

I'll protect you 🎉

[@brianphillips7696]

Actually police property is public property so privacy laws shouldn’t apply. Lol

[@ZombiePanda1776]

You would have a youtube channel

[@raspberrypimilitant2242]

If it's not controlled air space and your authorized to fly ie your drone is under the weight limit for registration requirements and I guess meets the new air id requirements I would assume it's the same as recording with your phone or a camera the same police station?

[@AnyaMidkiff]

To be fair, when I've asked the "birds aren't real" people i saw at a gas station, they said, "No, we don't really think it's 'all' birds, but it makes enough of an impact as a slogan that people will start looking closer to see if SOME aren't." Made sense.

[@lisabruner7018]

I had a bird drone land on my roof when I had the,dogs in the yard. I have,never,seen one before, so I jyst,stared at it.

[@AnyaMidkiff]

@@lisabruner7018 I actually saw a dragonfly one. I thought I was imagining it until it suddenly dropped to the ground and sparked. 😳

[@sardonic_smile_8752]

I understand even insurance companies use drones to surveil home properties to scan for unkempt yards and use that information to deny insurance coverage.

[@josefmazzeo6628]

Report them to the FAA for illegal drone flyover.

[@ADBLOCKER4YOUTUBE]

The County Assessor here uses them to surveil property to decide tax rates.

[@theophila214]

Ugh, I hate it all.

[@emilyfeagin2673]

They do

[@garyweber7139]

All of this should be banned, the only exception is if there is a probable cause, and there is a warrant.

[@williammorrill946]

"I was cleaning my shotgun and it went off!" Honest.

[@craigrobbins3540]

@@williammorrill946 that sounds like a valid secure to me!

[@TheLittlered1961]

Are drones a protected species? Pull! 😂😂😂

[@CherylMeyers-p8z]

Same thing happened with my crossbow

[@dwainmcwilliams2043]

You still get a ticket for dislodging a weapon. Possibly might even get an early morning wrong address SWAT raid.

[@TheLittlered1961]

@@dwainmcwilliams2043 depends on where you live and/or if you get caught.

[@danmcelroy6584]

I personally believe they should not be allowed to do so without a warrant!

[@TonyGarrett-p1c]

This shit is allowed to go on because We the People, collectively, tolerate it.

[@Isaac_132]

Hmmm ... a VPN and a search on how to build an EMP gun seems to be in order. 🤣

[@TacPhoenix]

Yup

[@nxsecuresucks]

Has to stay within certain power limits, and yes that's legal.. but how you do it isn't that... It's to deauthentication of the Wi-Fi packets being used.. If they're using a cell signal for operation, they're violating multiple laws... Depending on the factors at play

[@turboprint3d]

Need a ark and an antenna, maybe a shield to focus the beam . Could also be done with parts from a microwave , could be dangerous tho would not attempt if understanding of the subject it limited . Wifi 2.4 and 5.8ghz jammers are available online. And old satellite dish would be a good reflector to direct a signal in a small beam.

[@stickman-1]

"1400 agencies using drones.." Except the Secret Service.

[@apacheturtleisland9462]

bingo

[@apacheturtleisland9462]

bingo

[@thatsreality5184]

😂​@@apacheturtleisland9462

[@thatsreality5184]

😂 yeah make it make sense .

[@gregratcliff9831]

Don't take Mt word for it. But lookup Fed-Ex spying for the government I believe it like 40,000 of their delivery trucks already have them in their trucks..a bunch of BS so much for living in a free country!!!

[@danielvest9602]

I thought the Institute for Justice just fought the "open field doctrine" and won.

[@kingjamesgorden3]

That relates to cops walking around on your property that’s outside of your “curtilage”

[@i-m-bossride]

In the state of Tennessee, yes. SCOTUS, though, has not ruled on the issue since they first created it.

[@guyintenn]

That was in May and..."the Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson affirmed that the Tennessee Constitution bars game wardens from conducting warrantless searches of private property." The case pertained to TWRA Game Wardens entering private property and placing game cameras. It effectively killed the "Open Fields" doctrine in TN that TWRA had been using for years. The ruling was in relation to the TN state constitution. The US Supreme Court would have to make a ruling on a case for it to be nationwide.

[@chadkerwin4719]

​@i-m-bossride "the state of Tennessee" isn't what you think it is. It doesn't have physically defined borders with dirt, trees, people, etc 9n it. It's a business organization. It's not the same as the state known as Tennessee. Also, why would anyone care what "SCOTUS"rules on? As an American, the only "supreme court" that matters are a jury of your peers, drawn from your community. However, I'm going to assume you claim to be a U.S. citizen and/or a citizen of the United States, yes? If so, then yeah you should probably listen to what your owners tell you to do.

[@guyintenn]

@@chadkerwin4719 Your word salad means absolutely nothing beyond the reality you have created for yourself in your own mind.

[@litemetal]

What’s next? Dogs and cats spying ? FedEx is spying for cops .😢 We all have neighbors, who knows what they are uploading about our lives 😮

[@craigrobbins3540]

CIA used a cat with embedded microphones on Hitler

[@e.v.squatch5835]

@@craigrobbins3540 Close - during the cold war in the 1960s they did outfit a cat with a mic and transmitter and planned on releasing it into a public area to eavesdrop. The only thing they head was the sound of a car horn, the minute they let the kitty out, he got hit by a taxi. $22 million down the crapper. Ref: Operation Acoustic Kitty. Also Hitler was not alive when the CIA existed - during his time they were called the OSS (Office of Strategic Services) National Security Act of 1947 turned them into the CIA, though there was a 2 year period between the disbanding of the OSS and the formation of the CIA.

[@litemetal]

@@craigrobbins3540 😂😅

[@CannabisCatog]

I'm pretty sure FedEx and UPS already are equipped with cameras that snatched license plate numbers.

[@xenaguy01]

@@craigrobbins3540 Interesting. Espcially since the CIA didn't even exist until Hitler had been dead for nearly two years.

[@gregfalco4528]

Almost 10 years ago, my grandmother was reaching the end, and I thought to take her to see the ocean one last time. We were standing on a seaside cliff looking out at the horizon, when I noticed something hovering about 20 feet past the cliff and 10 feet above us. It was something the size of a large man's hand, and it looked and moved just like a dragonfly, with a small camera where the head would be. It was almost silent, and the way it moved made it hard to spot at first. Once I started staring right at it and became visibly angry that some fed or local PD would be spying on my family when we were on a day out, it moved on the the next group of people on the ciff, then the next group of people, and so on until I lost sight of it. They've been using these drones for a while, and by now, they probably don't look like anything we recognize.

[@deborahroy3528]

This is a gross violation of our rights to privacy

[@christopherthomas6336]

Apparently Donald Trump security team had no access this technology

[@BenEthridge]

Christopher Thomas 6336; That would've shown too many facts

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

I don't know how the security people missed that guy but it would have been impossible to keep himself obscured from a drone.

[@stickman-1]

That was not the Donald Trump security team. That was the Biden/Cheatle Secret Service that failed.

[@tabathac444]

​@user-nd8cs3qx1v what is Christopher Thomas 6336?

[@NANASplash]

Their drone request was denied.

[@xyyx1091]

So to fly drones on a private property for surveillance is legal, however they are building drones which look like birds...😂

[@KennyG944]

Hey, I was just bird hunting. How could I have known that bird was a drone?

[@josefmazzeo6628]

If you shot down a drone that looked like an eagle, would you be arrested for shooting down a drone or shooting down an eagle which is also illegal (and a felony too I think)?

[@superuser8636]

@@josefmazzeo6628No because a drone is a drone and not an eagle and I could affirm that there is a noticeable difference

[@robertsmith2956]

@@KennyG944 It was a little tough, maybe I cooked it to long.

[@robertsmith2956]

@@superuser8636 Then explain the guys rotting in jail for selling the cops baby powder.

[@darrinlong8038]

Well the supreme Court needs to catch up

[@Broadsamurai]

The current Supreme Court would probably agree with drone surveillance.

[@Frank71]

Don't count on it.

[@captintinsmith3774]

​@@Frank71Agreed! These "Men" in long Black Robes actually work against We The People most of the time.....

[@williammorrill946]

Is there money in it for them?

[@LEK-we2hh]

🤣🤣

[@mistyblevins-stepp5285]

"...and other bad actors (inserts Steven Seagal photo)...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@craigrobbins3540]

I caught that also😂

[@262run]

Came to comments to see if anyone else caught that😂😅

[@TDC5]

@@klwthe3rd every time he breathes.

[@robertsmith2956]

@@klwthe3rd After about 250 donuts.

[@ordinaryman1904]

That was too funny !

[@justinbuddy56]

The cyborg dragonfly just blew my mind. I’m a bit distraught.

[@RIGGIDRICH]

Now someone needs to make a directional jamming device😂😂. If a drone falls on your property, do you have to return it?

[@joefaraone977]

Helicopters are NOT fixed-wing aircraft.

[@StsFiveOneLima]

Nor are drones (of the quad-copter type).

[@raspberrypimilitant2242]

But they are fixed fin aircraft 🐟 🚁 ❓ 😅

[@Hillbilly55-qk4yy]

FTP!

[@puckg2454]

File Transfer Protocol? What are you talking about?

[@GregZimdahl]

@@puckg2454 I would guess he means F*** the police.

[@ColonelSanders-xo9hp]

​@@GregZimdahlno, he's for the people

[@grumpygeorge]

If a hawk takes down a drone, can the cops do anything about it? Asking for a friend…

[@mickeycogan12]

You said "fixed wing" and showed heliocopters. Fixed wing means not a rotating wing.

[@StephanieSoressi]

Drones are not fixed wing either.

[@airadaimagery692]

@@StephanieSoressifixed wing drones are a thing.

[@fleonard4]

They can use Google Earth too. We are NOT free. There is no expectation of privacy.

[@jessealday8225]

Learn from the Russians, electronic jamming.

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

FCC violation. The FAA isn't happy until you're not happy. The FCC isn't happy until you're in jail.

[@46babaganoosh]

LOL, that's not working out so well.

[@traildriving]

Actually another attorney has said that you DO own the air space above your property which is why you can build up and create skyscrapers. The only reason planes can fly over your property is because the gov claims public right of way the same as if a 100 year old path ran through your property. I believe he did say what elevation was considered public as well, so don’t automatically think that whatever this guy says is absolute. You need a good attorney for this. Also, old farmers and ranchers will literally shoot F16s and other air craft flying over their properties because some dick head pilots start shooting their property, and those old guys know they are legally allowed to use fire arms to protect their livestock/property. I have heard many Air Force guys talking about how the planes came back with a bunch of holes in them and the gov has no recourse against the farmers because they were perfectly in their rights. So you DO have the right to shoot air craft.

[@WexMajor82]

Hello drone! Meet my friend, Mr. Shotgun.

[@josefmazzeo6628]

Followed by a free government paid stay at the Hotel Graybar.

[@brianhillis3701]

​@@josefmazzeo6628it just crashed into my pond. No you cannot come on my property to retrieve it. Good luck with the gators if you try.

[@-._--_.-]

​@@brianhillis3701 "Sir looks like your exotic animal licence has just expired"

[@ronalddaub9740]

F there drones

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

their*

[@lestvee4948]

"there"?? FFS!

[@scotthultin7769]

They can look through the side of your house and get a face recognition of who's in the house and where they are what are you showing us so far is nothing new they've had it out for 35 years

[@brianwillson3693]

Police in Texas have been using them for years.

[@jaysonrees738]

I actually build these little things. It's pretty weird how the rules are currently laid out, and often times quite stupid. The latest lawmaking that they're trying to push is known as Remote ID, which they expect anything weighing over 250 grams to have a GPS lock and emit a registered serial number, location, and pilot location. Of course, this rule has a huge number of holes in it, and the hardware is stupidly expensive compared to everything else on the machine. To date, I think I've found one person who plans to comply. This is out of hundreds. We feel like we're getting screwed for something that helps nobody, and hurts us.

[@craigrobbins3540]

Interesting !

[@SushiArmageddon]

Crazy how our taxes fund our own subjugation.

[@craigrobbins3540]

@@SushiArmageddon ain’t that the truth!

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

They are not trying to push remote ID. It passed over a year ago and went into effect earlier this year.

[@jaysonrees738]

@@jerseyshoredroneservices225 I say that they're still pushing for it because basically nobody has actually bothered with it yet. There has been such low interest in compliance that there wasn't even enough stock in place on their first try. That's why they had to delay it for six months.

[@deletelawz1984]

Great Video, Hampton Law. Thank You

[@JohnSmith-zi9or]

VPNs don't make your internet data private or safe. The government can still see your data.

[@lanceburke6236]

Yes but it takes time and resources for them to keep dive and backtrace your worldwide web travels.

[@JohnSmith-zi9or]

@@lanceburke6236 If your VPN server is in the USA, they just monitor the internet traffic coming out of the server which is unencrypted.

[@djs12007]

I believe the FAA laws regarding drones limit the altitude above 400 ft. when going over private residences, anything below 400 ft. is a violation of privacy.

[@LEK-we2hh]

🤣🤣

[@windrider65]

That's for private citizens, not Government drones.

[@nxsecuresucks]

That is correct and it's an illegal trespass. This KZbin lawyer has no idea what he's talking about on this subject matter.

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

That is not correct. In most circumstances the FAA altitude limit is 400 feet maximum. Drones (the small ones that we're thinking of in relation to this video) can only fly above 400' if they are within 400 feet of a structure and not in controlled airspace.

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

​@@windrider65 While I wouldn't expect the FAA to prosecute a remote pilot who was working for the government they are regulated under the same law. 14 CFR part 107

[@jimmyking998]

Are if they take the drums and fly up close to your bedroom window and see you when you are changing your clothes I know there is a lot of good cops but there is a lot of weird police officers 😔💔

[@craigrobbins3540]

Sounds more like a peeping Tom!

[@BillNye-bj5vi]

good cops? where

[@0blivioniox864]

Jezus christ, wasn't there a Black Mirror episode about this kind of stuff? Yet another case of government taking cues from Hollywood.

[@ReDivineMan]

There is no separation between government and Hollywood. That’s why epsteins client list still runs the show.

[@robertsmith2956]

South Park had the best drone episode.

[@craigrobbins3540]

I bet both get their “ideas” from the same source… DARPA

[@purdysanchez]

Air rights typically extend 1000 feet above a property before the FAA gets a default easement for aircraft. Small drones are banned from going above 400ft. So, by default a drone would be encroaching or trespassing if it flew over private property. It seems like the law is pretty clear cut, it's just that a court opinion hasn't explicitly reinforced the law yet.

[@LMYS5697]

Tmk it's at least 365 feet according to 70 yo jurisprudence.

[@tomeauburn]

FAA rules on drones say 400 ft is highest you can fly. Most drone operators will not fly low about a house as they understand privacy concerns and don't want trouble. I had a neighbor ask if I was flying one low over his house. I told him I wouldn't do that but it wasn't me. I suspect it was the power company. He talked about shooting it down and I told him it's a federal crime.

[@ghostbombl8034]

Theu used to go higher back when they first started this why I got ridded of my drones because of the Nazis laws.Its not fun anymore it sucks its a money scam since drones price ate higher than they worth.Its sad.Who wants low 400 feet if they can go higher. I understand because its a safty thing for airline so on but it sucks freedom is gone when it first started. This why I quite gaming befor the scam s started they went most digital scamy downloads.Now its scalping money time.😅

[@jimboha]

"Fixed wing" vs. "Rotary Wing". Most drones are rotary, but that case you cited said "fixed wing".

[@davidjernigan8161]

Between the crows, vultures, hawks, that hang around my house I may not have to worry about drones, that and all the trees.

[@kolbybeautymakeupartist]

I see drones everywhere, including some I’ve never seen before. But they are out there.

[@kevinwest7912]

"Their people?" Hell no! I don't belong to them!

[@justinferguson9779]

Invasion of privacy the police should never be allowed to fly a drone over private property.

[@Down4dhunt]

The Gov owns the air! Thats why you get a fed tax on your cell phone bills to use it lol

[@tecknows]

I would say "Yes, take it out." No one has any business flying anything in your air-space. The more land you have, the more rights to the airspace you have to a certain point. Zoning matters too. However, everyone has the right to privacy and protection of themselves and their own property. Any un-marked device near my home can and will be immediately disabled, regardless of Agency. Why? Truth be told, how do we know it's an agencies and not a Cartel? These days, it's better safe than sorry.

[@TinaMarie869]

I used to live way back in the mountains and was doing laundry. I had a helicopter just about land looking at me. Yes I was on the back porch using a ringerwasher. I gave them the finger because they were blowing my clothes off the line 😡

[@timmanagh2328]

Police aircraft, planes and helicopters are clearly marked as police vehicles. How do you know a drone belongs to the police? A few years ago in my cottage area ( in Ontario, Canada), thieves were using drones to survey private property to see who was not at their cottage so they new it was safe to break into ( this was reported by the police). In this area there are strick rules about where you can fly a privately-owned drone to try to prevent this. Real estate companies have to fill out paper work with the authorities to use a drone to photograph a listing, but often still get the police called to check them out. I don't know if police use drones here, but I will be keeping an eye out for large birds.

[@the-space-wiz]

If you ask why these things weren't around Trump on Saturday, your comments will be immediately removed from YT. Let that sink in.

[@rogervalentine8092]

Using a drone to peer into a window/living space would or should fall under the same ruling as a neighbor having camera's viewing your property. It's legal to view the happenings outdoors but illegal to view inside the house of said property.

[@eilenekellogg-ki2br]

If the cops have all of this equipment to spy on me, they must be awful board on the job.

[@Noneyabiznass-MagaTrue]

Better have a warrant!

[@BenJones-qn3tk]

I'm in aviation and FAA laws say no flying below 500 AGL (Above Ground Level)

[@EfficientRVer]

Well, if you're in aviation, you'd better study up and learn what the FAA actually says, because even for an airplane or helicopter, it's a lot more complicated than that. And for drones, they are allowed in the opposite of the places airplanes are allowed, so that they don't hit airplanes.

[@mxcollin95]

One thing I would disagree with is that according to FAA rules an aircraft can’t get closer than 1000ft to anything over populated areas and 500ft to anything over sparsely populated areas or be in a position that in the event of an engine failure you would cause damage or undue harm to persons or property on the ground. I’m not sure exactly how those federal aviation regulations relate to drones but those are the rules for general aircraft.

[@MadyJay76]

The Birds Aren't Real movement was actually a joke made up by the creator, they don't really believe that...

[@Boondok_Dwaeji]

The "movement" is commentary on how little evidence and critical thinking we will do for a "loudly proclaimed truth" that is factually incorrect.

[@thebigdog2295]

Still think you're living in a "free country"?

[@danhardin7243]

I own my "Air rights" as well as "mineral rights!" IT has been proven in FEDERAL COURT!

[@EfficientRVer]

You have the "air rights" to build things there. You have no rights to stop aircraft from flying there.

[@supermankent1041]

The key to freedom is to have "Land" NOT "Property"

[@suebaxter301]

couple years ago my oldest daughter notice there were drone flying over head of her home, cousin and aunt's home. one was even close to her aunt's home. they had like blue and/or red flashing lights. this went on every night and not sure even to this day why they were over their places

[@windrider65]

My drone has red and green lights on it like an airplane.

[@suebaxter301]

@@windrider65 interesting well this was in the night and there were several so the only thing they can think of was law enforcement spying on them...

[@-._--_.-]

Just think that now drones have high energy beam weapons on them. Sound familiar? Like the sentinels from Halos guilty spark mission. What if Halo was the future of our reality, and we are actually the Forerunners who created all the high tech.

[@suebaxter301]

@@-._--_.- well ukraine is using the US money that was "given to them" and making AI assault drones that kills so yeah doesn't surprise me any

[@falcorthewonderdog2758]

The first question is how do you know who owns the drone? Didn't the supreme court ruled you own the air space above your property and can shoot down drones that enter your space?

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

No the Supreme Court did not rule that you can shoot at drones, or any other aircraft. Weather people technically own the airspace or not is irrelevant. It was decided a long time ago that the airspace is a public domain that anybody can use according to FAA regulations. Even if you own that airspace, you cannot regulate it.

[@Trashpanda5568]

don't forget the remote ID broadcasting

[@neo-ytisill]

I've seen drones in the shape of geese flying around in the middle of moon lit nights...they're out there! They fly and fly without ever flapping their wings once...

[@0blivioniox864]

Illegal? No. Obnoxious? OH yeah.

[@maskedman2210]

So if its not illegal to fly drones outside of a window and see in, and its considered a public vantage point, then it is not illegal for us to do it to them. Get some footage of some of these cops or politicians in the shower and watch it become illegal REAL fast!!!

[@jma8352]

with the ring cameras the police have access to them should be illegal. so insurance company's are using these drones without your permission. By the way, they have the tech to see through your walls now, so what is to stop them from using them?

[@wdtaut5650]

You may be interested in reading, "A Government of Wolves", by John Whitehead. Published 11 years ago, it has all this and more. Contrary to the statement at 14:54, there are plenty of drones that can be put in your house.

[@mustafasfleas7342]

Additionally, The FAA has stated that a home/land owner owns the airspace above their property up from the ground to "navigable air space". Navigable air space is defined by the FAA as 1500 feet above ground level and higher. So, how is it, that drones which are limited by FAA rules and regulations to not more than 400 feet above ground level are able to trespass above a land owners property???

[@EfficientRVer]

Pretty much everything you said is wrong, except the 400 foot AGL limit for drones. And the 400 foot rule is more complicated than just being 400 AGL. You can be an unlimited height above ground if you stay within 400 feet of a structure, a cliff, or whatever. 400 feet from the top of an antenna tower, whether up or to the side or both, is OK.

[@donoliver96]

We no longer live in a free America

[@Handle1969]

Glad to know this. Founders? What would they say? Seriously! Full Confession: I was on back porch. Swatted at a large fly that landed on picnic table. Flushed it. Turns out it was a warrantless drone. I’m now on a list. Have hired an attorney. Told to remain silent if asked by police if I have ever stated “I wouldn’t hurt a fly”

[@robertsmith2956]

All hail the Gigashadow......

[@axxeminister]

There used to be a thing called "Air rights", which meant the space above your property was also yours. Not sure if it applies anymore.

[@thegarbagegladiators4735]

You can purchase air space and the ground below the water...if you have enough money of course. Then you can file trespassing complaints. 😊

[@mattalford3932]

Minimum altitude over buildings is 500 feet generally. Drones are allowed to fly from ground level to a maximum of 400 feet. Helicopters are different

[@rinyotsu2.0]

So what you're saying is its illegal for the police to shoot down my drone too?

[@EfficientRVer]

Absolutely correct. Nobody can shoot a drone down, who isn't allowed to shoot a manned airplane down.

[@kpc9650]

More importantly, are we certain we have competent lawmakers monitoring police (ab)-use of these surveillance technologies? Remember, these lawmakers have granted police the ability to edit police body cam footage, as well as withhold public owned footage. Propose we deploy over our judges and other politicians to ensure they are compliant with laws as part of proto-type testing! Why do we allow injustice until lawsuits / cases reach SCOTUS? Seems like America is doomed because of elected incompetent lawmakers. VOTE WISELY!

[@robevans5222]

Since drones are legally considered to be aircraft, and therefore have certain flyover rights afforded to aircraft, I would like to see the courts also clarify that they must conform to FAA-enforced minimum altitude regulations, as follows: § 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General. Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes: (a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface. (b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft. (c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.

[@josefmazzeo6628]

Hmmm - seems to be a conflict here. Can't fly above 400 feet, but can't fly below 1000 feet (of the highest point) in congested areas....seems like a loophole for city dwellers.

[@nxsecuresucks]

So called drones AREN'T AIRCRAFT. That's the issue everyone is having. The FAA can't just claim they are aircraft by redefined in the definition... This was just taken up with the supreme Court.. I've posted this countless times on this thread that this so called lawyer has no idea what he's talking about on this subject matter. He's making a KZbin video for clicks... Stating caselaw of cases that had bad lawyers. Then not telling you the full details of the real case

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

If you're familiar with part 91 regulations you should also be familiar with part 107.

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

​@@josefmazzeo6628 400'? Where do you see that in 91.119 I don't understand what you're talking about

[@ChrisTietjen_00]

91 regulates manned aircraft and part 107 regulates unmanned aircraft. You're reading the wrong set of rules. Also most localities have voyeurism laws that protect you from "peeping Tom's" which would apply when non-police drones are being invasive to your sense of privacy. Under part 107 a drone is still considered an aircraft and you cannot interfere with its flight without facing legal consequences.

[@karezaalonso7110]

6:40 talking about fixed-wing aircraft while showing helicopters LOL

[@jesuslopez-007]

If you got alexa and those rings cameras they can defenelity tap into your system if they wanted to.

[@WhatsCookinToday]

This isn’t just for police. Citizens can also use drones to take pictures of PUBLIC places, including police stations.

[@ethanp1erce]

BIRDS ARENT REAL!!!

[@theophila214]

I understand now, LOL.

[@presidentialsuite6406]

They used the drones that look like birds on my husband in the late 90s and early 2000s. My father in law would go and feed the wild birds at the house. N he told my husband one day, all the birds eat but those. 😂they were drones from the police. They have ones too that look as flies and bees. I have photos of how they look on the inside and the mechanics. I had them for years. You can find them if you do a Google search. You know now the LED light bulbs can be used to get information on you as well. I seen a way they hook the light bulb to a device that shows them/tells them someway what you were talking about and doing in a room. I'm not a technology person, hell I can barely get my phone to work properly. When it messes up I get a new one. So I'm not good with describing what I seen. Also they have all kinds of spy cameras.From smoke detectors to as small as a tiny screw in the wall. So don't trust a damn soul. They had a way to tell about energy and frequencies that is in a room. The CIA has had this type of technology for many years. Look into it. I'm not crazy. There's a case where they used this technology for some murder but it was probably a top secret file. I read and watched a short video of them explaining how the technology worked and how the energy creates like a memory of whatever in a room along the walls. What we need to focus on are these slaughter bots. Which are like those lil round balls that are released in the movie TWISTER. These are programmed to kill and take out people. You program them say for an example they put my information in them to say I'm a terrorist or whatever. The thing is once released you can't stop them. They seek to destroy. So they go through walls and doors to kill. Basically no emotion attached. No thinking no nothing. Done deal. I WILL BE PUSHING DAISIES BY MORNING. SHOT TO THE DOME. I will try to come back to link some information, I gotta go for now. Slaughter bots: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hV6VpaOtjJWeo7csi=tuSIw_i5JQ2OOVlc

[@AMERICANPATRIOT1945]

What is the difference between a police drone and a police helicopter? The drone is only a problem if the drone is flying so low as to be a real invasion of privacy, i.e. it is being used to look into windows not visible from the street without a warrant.

[@dragonsguardianofcrystalhearts]

What about when 3 fly over right in a row, a black one hovers near you home for zero reason at all and you keep hearing the humming of those drones throughout the night? What would that qualify as? They got a whole sky out there. They don't need to fly like that here.. You've heard of gang stalking right

[@sharonducci7089]

More than a miles above your home it is not.

[@JerryWhite-ee5hy]

There is no distance that restricts drones. You do not own the airspace above your home. Not even one inch. Period. They can fly over one inch and it's perfectly legal. And if you shoot it down,you are being recorded shooting down a private aircraft. Not smart.

[@catzdollz9810]

We know for a FACT that they use them AT NIGHT...HOVERING IN FRONT OF WINDOWS!!!!!...in North Bergen, NJ. WE SAW THEM!!!

[@Michael-Purcell]

1000 feet and higher can a police drone be used and it can not use zoom cameras. There are peeping tom laws if drones peek in your windows without a warrant.

[@ricksturdevant2901]

I always find Attorney Jeff Hampton's videos very informative and I enjoy the information postings, for me to research. I am a big fan and I share many of his videos Thanks to his channel I get smarter every day

[@ann8765]

an elderly couple just was on T.V. regarding a peeping tom using a drone going window to window. Cops were called but drone operator was not located. So some random guy can send a drone to drop poison over your home or fly a dangerous explosive. Legislation needs to be updated.

[@xenaguy01]

It seems to me that since the SCOTUS ruled that aerial surveillance of a yard was lawful only if done with fixed wing aircraft from 1,000+ feet, any use of a rotary drone under 1,000 feet would be a 4th Amendment violation.

[@EfficientRVer]

That's not what they said. Those were just the facts in that particular case.

[@joehannah1343]

If you live in one of the States needing a warrant, does the state then need to provide land owner with a copy of warrant Before execution of warrant??

[@EfficientRVer]

Knock knock. Who's there? Mr. Drone, with a warrant.

[@dougied3449]

Thats why private use of signal jammers are banned.

[@AB-ws2sj]

Had a cop spying on my through drone use once before in Canada Ontario (Peel Region). I live in a corner house #1 with a forest in the back yard past the fence. They hovered over the trees and were just looking through my light window. ( I can’t prove that last part but this region is notoriously anal and charges the most in the country for police fees a whopping 36.5% of tax in the area goes to the police force.)

[@AntiCoruptionCentral]

Step 1: realise they're not "your/our government". All other steps are up to ones own discretion.