Lawyers (try to) explain Darrell Brooks’ sovereign citizen arguments

[@Hideaway904]

The words "I didn't hear you" have never crossed this man's lips.

[@sufferedlearnedchanged]

Sovereign citizen is an oxymoron. You're either sovereign or a citizen. You can't be both.

[@cory6266]

That's why those lunatics are switching to "American state national."

[@awakenchildofgod5556]

No the ucc says that anyone that takes an oath of office relinquishes their citizenship and become foreign entities and all subdivisions in municipalities become foreign land an entity's go read it

[@noahboa4894]

@@cory6266 do your research before you call people Lunatics.

[@cory6266]

@@noahboa4894 I have, that's how I know they're both crazy _and_ stupid.

[@OpalLeigh]

I guess they want the benefits of both with none of the responsibility 🙊

[@siriush100]

Haha, watching this while driving.... I mean traveling.

[@kayti8719]

I watched every minute of that trial. It was wild. One would think watching a 3 week trial that had 8-10 hour days would be boring but not this one! I am looking very forward to sentencing.

[@HollyWilliamsgaden]

He was deservingly found guilty on ALL 76 charges!!!! If he is sentenced to max on all charges it works out to like 1000year + 6 X Life !!

[@sophistichistory4645]

My autism kicked in and I just had to calculate the full length of Brooks' consecutive sentences which would be approximately 1219 years. Since a release date of 3241 is very difficult to fathom, I thought it would be more instructive to ask the question.... If Brooks was scheduled to be released today, in 2022......what year would he have entered prison?? Answer: 803 Anno Dominae Yes, that's right, to be released from prison in 2022, ol' Darrell would have had to enter prison back when Charlemagne ruled Gaul and the Moors were at the height of their military expansion.

[@dionpryor369]

​@@sophistichistory4645love history and your comments

[@falaahblackwell1535]

I hear what these two are saying, and I could imagine what and who they work for.. My thing is .. if the defendant in court is arguing quoting law, Supreme Court ruling, conditional rights and bill of rights.. Argue back against their points. Don’t just use your authority and court influence to bully the defendant by ignoring what he’s quoting from law or straight up say we ain’t accepting that in This court… That makes me think twice

[@rud5101]

People have been trying these exact same arguments for years. They do not work. Someone who actually understands how our laws work wouldn't make these arguments.

[@venz8201]

You guys should make more of these explanations, showing how the case law they cite is obsolete and misinterprets the holdings.

[@envisagefilmshouston]

And they will tell you is “nonsense” so you won’t reap all the benefits of your freedom. Knowledge is power. And these people don’t want you to have knowledge. Because it give them a an edge over you. Is ALL ABOUT MONEY. If you become sovereign they can’t make money off you!

[@rud5101]

This nonsense does not work in court. It will not give you an edge over anyone.

[@envisagefilmshouston]

@@rud5101 What nonsense? Because I seen people go free all cases dropped because the way they maneuvered in the system. So what nonsense? Like I said KNOWLEDGE IS POWER I SAID WHAT I SAID. Read a book and learn something.

[@rud5101]

@@envisagefilmshouston How'd that work for Darrell Brooks? There's dozens of other cases you can watch on KZbin where these arguments do nothing except get them into more trouble. Can you show me a case where this nonsense won in court? Because I've yet to see one.

[@rud5101]

@@envisagefilmshouston If this really worked, don't you think defense attorneys would have the easiest job in the world?

[@envisagefilmshouston]

@@rud5101 it don’t get you into more trouble it just gets you removed from court. Later on they drop all charges because you can then sue the court for kidnapping. I’ve seen it done a lot of times in the system.

[@caosthestampeed1200]

He messed up when he sed he was a citizen instead of a natural man

[@pheobrien8704]

So if he doesn’t believe in the government then why did he constantly try to use OUR Constitution when he thought it would favor him??

[@skybison_9]

The government is against the constitution because they are a corporation not a country. He’s actually using the constitution to fight the corrupt corporation. Do you se how this works now?

[@JohnAdams-mu7xd]

You think Congress or the legislature favors your Constitution😂😂😂😂 why are they constantly trying to subvert it

[@josephfrechette9916]

If the government was fraudulent it would definitely violate your rights. So the sovereign citizrn argument would be about as effective as telling a burglar its illgal to break into a house expecting them to leave😅

[@ambushbullies]

You sound slow the government pays out lawsuits daily for doing just that violating peoples rights look up how many 18usc 241,242. They like to settle out of court so there’s no record but ppl get paid my girls cousin got 20 million out the Sandusky shit and that was just a old man raping a kid and guess who pays for it the tax paying slaves and Penn state university. I bet you believe your a United States citizen too lol 😂 yall are slow we in a republic. You’re a state citizen not a us citizen. But u gotta know how to convert your status . But right now your a corporate fiction with very few actual rights def don’t have your unalienable rights as long as your still a US citizen

[@crisg1207]

Why do they always roll their eyes?

[@Dee47881]

Exactly

[@danbruka]

It's pissing me off too, I only came to the comments to complain hahaha , thank god I'm not the only one !

[@tanyafrida7380]

Brooks was always looking for a loophole. Lazy people are the hardest workers. (Heard that somewhere 😃)

[@wendyleeconnelly2939]

That comes from the observation that lazy people make more work for themselves. Think of the person who doesn't want to retie their shoes, so they leave them tied, struggles slightly to get the shoes off, then struggles mightily hopping around to get them on again

[@thelaurens1996]

Ok sheep

[@dionpryor369]

​@@thelaurens1996 lazy traitor and weirdo.

[@drewdonaghy6944]

@@wendyleeconnelly2939tell me you work for Big Shoelace without telling me you work for Big Shoelace

[@joshuawidener8407]

Technically they do believe in "common law" and says it's only a crime if there is a victim, until there is a victim and then they change their mind on that too! Lol

[@roninmd]

and they are correct

[@joshuawidener8407]

@@roninmd yeah but I'm just saying their understanding of the sovereign arguments is lacking lol. Btw, that's a good thing!

[@MissSpaz]

I remember watching the trial with my mom and saying "watch, watch, he's definitely going to try and call the state of Wisconsin or the city as a witness" I definitely did a sort of jig when I was right lol

[@JeshieWafflez]

The woman is so much shorter, I thought she was in a different video and I thought the guy was this Darrell Brooks until he spoke. xD

[@alanwilliams4443]

The one thing that I ask on SovCits, if the government is a corporation, then since all amendments voted by states and Congress (and they a corporation), they can't use the Constitution or Bill of Rights

[@pearlcahoon3484]

😂😂😂😂 do you even know why we have a bill of rights??? The america was not actually america until almost the 1790s. We over threw one tyrant and the people aka citizens refused to join this new government or accept its authority without certain conditions. Those conditions are our bill of rights. As the decades and centuries went on we added more rights. As long as you are a legal citizen of the U.S no law can be passed that goes against those rights. Any law being passed that would take away said rights is not lawful. The constitution is the Supreme law of the land as is the bill of rights. This is 1st grade history.

[@jaimeroman8440]

Unless you r a national of wait u r born one. Stupid learn law and also understand it. I paid 5k in every blacks law Dictionary united states styles. Us citizen r slaves

[@roninmd]

Correct. Just like England, all laws emanate from the sovereign, the original jurisdiction of all law. In America, we the people are the sovereign, therefore the people possess original jurisdiction. All laws emanate from the people. We the people granted the government to rule for us but they can only do so from the derived power of the people's original jurisdiction. By an act of the people's representatives in Congress, the supreme court created the federal rules of civil procedure and later the federal rules of criminal procedure. These rules fall under the umbrella of Maritime or Admiralty law. It's a misnomer because maritime laws are the operational rules and customs of ships at sea. (Yes it's a thing. Created by an act of Congress known as the Rules Enabling Act of 1934.) It is also known as the law of corporations or merchant law. (See: constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S2-C1-12-1/ALDE_00013649/?) Derived law is not real law but merely corporate public policy. The corporate person is a real entity in legalese. It's actually an article 9 - 102(a)(71) registered organization as defined in your state's uniform commercial code. That name is in all capital letters because all entities whether businesses, trusts, corporations, and estates should be written in "conspicuous format". UCC 1-201(10) "Conspicuous", with reference to a term, means so written, displayed, or presented that a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it. Whether a term is "conspicuous" or not is a decision for the court. Conspicuous terms include the following: (A) a heading in capitals equal to or greater in size than the surrounding text, or in contrasting type, font, or color to the surrounding text of the same or lesser size; and (B) language in the body of a record or display in larger type than the surrounding text, or in contrasting type, font, or color to the surrounding text of the same size, or set off from surrounding text of the same size by symbols or other marks that call attention to the language. This entity is not you but a re- presentation of you. It is the entity that is being charged in a court. Yet, it is a fictional person. Courts trick you into assuming liability for this fiction. They forced this authority upon you by a fraudulent transaction with your mother. Your mother was not aware that by applying for a birth certificate, she mistakenly granted your estate to the government. The act grants to the government, legal ownership of everything you own including your body. There's a reason why your name is in all capital letters. see UCC 1-201(10). It is the law telling you that you should have known that birth certificate isn't you, and the people who enforce the law should have known it too because they are the trustees or bailees and are responsible for the entity's bills. All people who are born or domiciled in the 50 state alliance are known as American Nationals first. That is the original state of the people in "we the people" found in the constitution. The founders were not citizens to begin with. The constitution, a common law document, created the United States, in reality a corporate trust tasked with managing the commercial affairs between states and other nations. Congress then added the 14th amendment which was intended to grant civil rights for the offspring of freed slaves. Since the corporate U.S. has only commercial jurisdiction over citizens, it does not have authority over the natural rights or constitutional rights of U.S. Nationals. In fact, the right enumerated in the constitution is what limits the government from taking them. If you can prove that your state denied your rights protected by the constitution, you can sue the state at the Supreme Court level for breach of fiduciary duty but you must do so as an American National. As a citizen, your civil rights are privileges derived from corporate U.S. commercial jurisdiction. Privileges can be taken away by those who granted them. A constitutional right; however, can not be liened, a process of charging a customer for commercial use.

[@Action2me]

When you get all your legal advice from ChatGPT 😂

[@brutusmaximus5380]

That's because you are a 14th amendment citizen. The status was meant for the offspring of freed slaves. The government owns legal title over your person. You were never educated in administering your estate or taking legal ownership of you estate from the government.

[@snowgangjeff5878]

I’ve seen a young black man with dreads and a felony on his record with my own eyes in court in Charles county md represent himself as a sovereign citizen in 2013. After a couple minutes of arguing that the name the judge addressed him by was not his name and some other things that I can’t recall(but I thought he was trippin and digging himself a deeper hole)the judge eventually Addressed him by the name he gave and said”mr whatever I know what your talking about we are going to clear the room so we can talk please calm down” they cleared the room for like 20 minutes and when they opened the courtroom up again he came out and we I started a conversation with him and asked him what was that about. He showed me his paper that said the gun they arrested him with had to be returned to him(this is in MD) that’s the first time I heard about a sovereign citizen.he told me it is not a game and you have to really educate yourself because authorities know when you are uneducated with this. He told me much more but the point I’m making is when I went home(2013) I searched sovereign citizen on KZbin and it gave plenty videos of people successfully claiming this right and law enforcement backing down and court cases being thrown out. But now I look and all the videos are downplaying or trying to make this concept sound like a fairytale pipe dream. I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO CLAIM THIS WHO CAN ONLY BEING DEALT WITH BY THE CONSTITUTION AND NOT BY STATES INDIVIDUAL LAWS 💯💯💯💯💯%SURE

[@tommyfoster4601]

So you think the state a corporation has legal standing and we just have to submit? WRONG.

[@Lumposaurus]

I honestly think that the big deal with Brooks was his colossal ego and moronic approach to his defense. There have been other, horrible crimes where the court case wasn't nearly as much of a KZbin phenomenon.

[@MRSMAYRA1963]

Darrell Brooks is a Lunatic

[@earlkeith4135]

6th Amendment "You have a Right to confront your accuser and cross examine the evidence against you!"

[@cory6266]

You have the right to confront _witnesses,_ not _accusers._ That's why it's legal for a government to bring charges against you.

[@earlkeith4135]

@@cory6266 Yes! My Bad! Yet -> Evidence Against You would Cover Witnesses, and Accusers Should be Seed for Slander when Proven False, They need to be Held Accountable!

[@Armoredcompany]

Except that slander only applies to statements that the accuser makes KNOWING they are false with intent to harm. If someone makes an accusation they believe to be true in good faith then it cannot be considered slander. Therefore, unless you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they 100% knew their statement was not accurate, you're shit out of luck.

[@1992marigold]

How do you seed for slander?

[@eldenfanatic6890]

This group of individuals on this video could not be more wrong😂 when a person becomes an American national, they are denouncing their citizenship of being American. They are a number of processes to release, said citizen from the jurisdiction of the American government that does not mean that anyone is above the law, and if anybody says this, they are simply stupid, it only means that you are now a foreigner on the land. Yes, there are arguments that sovereign individuals use that do not make sense. But there are other processes which do have legal binding actions. A lot of people that are talking crap about the sovereign individuals do not do their homework, nor do they research or properly investigate what an American national is, and they continue to look foolish to American nationals. But hey, if your revenue consists of talking crap about someone who is trying to leave the system of slavery that we live in then by all means, do what you feel you need to do.

[@rud5101]

Perhaps if these American Nationals would stop losing in court, people would have a higher opinion of them.

[@eldenfanatic6890]

@@rud5101 those idiots are not American nationals. They’re people who watched a TikTok video.don’t confuse the two.

[@GaGotti]

You 2 are close minded ppl. Exactly the type the government loves, cause it's actually constitutional law to have the ability to separate yourself from a government if you feel it's tyrannical

[@annettebaxter8006]

I'm impressed at all the legal advice everyone is giving 2 Harvard Law Grads that are currently practicing law...

[@sirbey9608]

They don't practice law they practice codes and statue's

[@annettebaxter8006]

@@sirbey9608 I was being sarcastic... These two both practice law.

[@biglow8762]

That’s all they do is practice law not master law!

[@golden-63]

@@sirbey9608 Moortard!

[@johntrevy1]

​@@sirbey9608No they practice law, which involves codes and STATUTES. I don't recall seeing any statues here.

[@thomasfx3190]

Isn’t that the girl from Vintage Space?

[@earlkeith4135]

I don't know about Sovereign Citizens But I do know You Two Are Wrong! ACLU certified.

[@TheDirge69]

He should not have gone to court in the first place and demand a Trial By Jury who in their Common Law minds would convict his arse! He can't have it both ways.

[@christophercooks3313]

Is this legal advice?

[@byrontownsel7274]

It’s common legal knowledge.

[@jrrtt25]

“Under what lawful law!?” -An Idiot

[@shaincastillo6772]

I am Definitely not a sovereign citizen. However, you are completely wrong, and I don't understand how attorneys can say things that are constitutionally voilating. The 6th amendment guarantees the right to the cross examination of any accusers as well as the party or parties in which brings the accusations. If the state is the accuser, then the state can be cross examined. Or the representative of the state of said accusation. How could any person in the United States defend themselves in criminal court without this right? So you must ask youself.... how can a State judiciary bring charges on a citizen with out an accusing party?

[@rud5101]

Not exactly. The 6th Amendment gives the accuser and the accused the right to bring witnesses against each other. The state is the accusing party, represented by the DA. The accused doesn't cross examine the state, they cross examine witnesses of the state. Nothing they said was incorrect.

[@joepettus9045]

What about the jury nullification part?

[@mw3309]

Yeah it's a thing, but saying it over and over as if he didn't do anything makes him look crazier lmao

[@Jveeze]

Blacks law book is a great place to learn more up on these topics and understand from a whole point of view

[@xxIAshesIxx]

lol they want to ignore all laws but want all the protections and rights of a citizen. Cant have it both ways

[@Whatdotheyhavetohide]

I still think Star Wars is the true story ( names maybe not even changed) of what happened to the past resets, and the ones in control are the Empire, we are the rebellion, I believe we do have the force ( just have amnesia) and that we are all Luke and Lea 😮

[@user-ox5br8bg2t]

American juriprudence will enlighten you. Along with the uniform commercial code

[@carverofchoice]

Time will prove this video right. Dude will serve time. Then you can believe in his arguments all you want, but if the outcome is the same either way then it doesn't matter, his conspiracy arguments and beliefs are still false by all practical measurements.

[@TheNewSoda]

you see my honor my dog stepped on a bee that means I'm above the law and I'm immune from all responsibilities

[@thetastelesschef7463]

But doing the right paperwork in order to be a State national and some of these terms are much nicer to the "private person." One of the biggest helpers for this is a dam good lawyer/attorney etc etc.... I've researched this for a few, years and know that I don't know much, but talking to attorneys, especially immigration types are people are you really want in your corner. These types try to sway us from trying or at the most get us to do better research to not go down the wrong rabbit holeS.

[@joshcamacho6488]

Harvard doesn't "educate" you on the straw man?

[@supaflyeguy30]

Facts I read the book meet your straw man and it blew my mind.

[@golden-63]

Sovtard nonsense.

[@LugerexxYanni]

​@@supaflyeguy30 you two bozos still mucking about below the poverty line ain't doing shit lmao u really think a Harvard law student knows less than u, ur actually insane and this is why you stay poor

[@walkerking3875]

he has a point about the all capital letters meaning "corporate you" though as long as he has a social security number then he is not a soveriegn citizen

[@freecycle53215]

You are an idiot

[@walkerking3875]

@@freecycle53215 you're a slave

[@freecycle53215]

@@walkerking3875 I have so much more freedom than you

[@walkerking3875]

@@freecycle53215 how much land do you own? let me know when you get 1000+ acres

[@freecycle53215]

@@walkerking3875 no one believes you, goober

[@Sarakate601]

I was wondering why people use this argument like it’s actually gonna work..

[@johntrevy1]

MH issues.

[@LucasCarroll0]

He wouldn't shut up about the subject matter jurisdictionn you could tell it was only card

[@MrAllysonn]

So when darel says he doesn't consent to be that name which name Dareel would like to be called ?

[@roninmd]

Remember there is no point in paying property taxes if your home is subject to invasion at anytime. The corporate person is a real entity in legalese. It's actually an article 9 - 102(a)(71) registered organization as defined in your state's uniform commercial code. That name is in all capital letters because all entities whether businesses, trusts, corporations, and estates should be written in "conspicuous format". UCC 1-201(10) "Conspicuous", with reference to a term, means so written, displayed, or presented that a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it. Whether a term is "conspicuous" or not is a decision for the court. Conspicuous terms include the following: (A) a heading in capitals equal to or greater in size than the surrounding text, or in contrasting type, font, or color to the surrounding text of the same or lesser size; and (B) language in the body of a record or display in larger type than the surrounding text, or in contrasting type, font, or color to the surrounding text of the same size, or set off from surrounding text of the same size by symbols or other marks that call attention to the language. This entity is not you but a re- presentation of you. It is the entity that is being charged in a court. Yet, it is a fictional person. Courts trick you into assuming liability for this fiction. They forced this authority upon you by a fraudulent transaction with yout mother. Your mother was not aware that by applying for a birth certificate, she mistakenly granted your estate to the government. The act grants to the government, legal ownership of everything you own including your body. There's a reason why your name is in all capital letters. see UCC 1-201(10). It is the law telling you that you should hve known that birth certificate isn't you, and the people who enforce the law should have known it too because they are the trustees or bailees and are responible for the entity's bills.

[@Whatdotheyhavetohide]

1:05:14 who’s filming it??😮

[@brutusmaximus5380]

Sometimes law enforcement will use term "constitutionalist" in place of "Sovereign citizen". While less racist [it's literally a prejudice against a "creed"], the word "constitutionalist" is ignorantly used as a derogatory term for a "subject" of the state who does not comply to a policeman's "lawful" orders. Their presumptions is that all "humans" physically "resident" in their state are subjects of the territory and under their jurisdiction. So using "constitutionalist" as a derogatory term is a form of "creed-ism". With that said, who is a traveler? A traveler is a nonresident passing through a jurisdiction to a destination ouside the jurisdiction. It is based on the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution and is the reason why there are no border checks between states.

[@Jeff250lbc]

Not sure how or when that 6 changed but it was always Face your accuser as in no secret testimony the language was clear about this.

[@Jeff250lbc]

Carruthers, 64 M.J. 340 (the Sixth Amendment guarantees an accused's right to be confronted with the witnesses against him; an important function of this constitutionally protected right is to provide the defense an opportunity to expose the possible interests, motives, and biases of prosecution witnesses).

[@PreachDaBeast]

👋👋👋👋 what's a STRAWMAN

[@davidmazza8714]

No one can say he didn’t try… and dats da troof!

[@dpolk0303]

Thank you for explaining this! I was lost with his ranting! I don't like him at all.

[@mariebourn8317]

Darrell is looking for loopholes in everything. Not only laws but also how to get out of paying for anything. He met a friend of mine and he told him everything he was doing. Well my friend was doing some work for him and later on he told me about who he was working for. I warned him to be very careful when it comes to dealing with people like him. And needless to say he didn't follow my advice and he wasn't paid for his service and there is nothing he can do about it.

[@pomegranate6221]

Sorry but, the courts keep emboldening these confused people 😐

[@spankyinok]

You guys are awesome

[@AUPNEXT]

If they say they're not us citizens why are they always complaining about their rights being violated? The rights are for US citizens not sovereign ones..

[@brandonlee3959]

Rights come from God, not constitutions

[@user-bh2oj4ih9w]

@@brandonlee3959 Not my rights!

[@brandonlee3959]

@@user-bh2oj4ih9w tell me more

[@roninmd]

All people who are born or domiciled in the 50 state alliance are known as American Nationals first. That is the original state of the people in "we the people" found in the constitution. The founders were not citizens to begin with. The constitution, a common law document, created the United States, in reality a corporate trust tasked with managing the commercial affairs between states and other nations. Congress then added the 14th amendment which was intended to grant civil rights for the offspring of freed slaves. Since the corporate U.S. has only commercial jurisdiction over citizens, it does not have authority over the natural rights or constitutional rights of U.S. Nationals. In fact, the right enumerated in the constitution is what limits the government from taking them. If you can prove that your state denied your rights protected by the constitution, you can sue the state at the Supreme Court level for breach of fiduciary duty but you must do so as an American National. As a citizen, your civil rights are privileges derived from corporate U.S. commercial jurisdiction. Privileges can be taken away by those who granted them. A constitutional right; however, can not be liened, a process of charging a customer for commercial use.

[@AUPNEXT]

@@roninmd bro there's a reason ya all go to jail.. instead of showing an id you'd rather go to jail and court. And the fact you guys think rules don't apply to you makes you a danger to society. Imagine the police are looking for someone who kidnapped a child and all they have to say is "this is my personal vehicle you can't search it" .. sounds stupid right? You need to grow up and stop trying to find ways to "stick it to the man" most of the time they just want to give you a ticket and send you on your way but you guys decide to make an entire spectacle on the side of the road, which shows you have way too much time on your hands

[@ambushbullies]

Us is a corporation this is all commerce

[@rustomkanishka]

All states depend upon the monopolisation of violence. Shouting "you don't have jurisdiction" is about as effective as shouting "sin is stored in the balls" when you're being arrested. Always fun to watch an arrest. Its almost always a smug looking yt person as POC do not need to give more reasons to get shot.

[@YoungTim95]

Freaking baloney yall just don’t know

[@Mr.greenthumb]

Theres only 1 sovereign, thats our creator, we have sovereignty, we grant a part of our sovereignty to our creation (government). And yes the sovereign citizen movement, was started by the bar. Read the law of nations or the principles of the law of nature. The constitution doesn't apply to you. Its a document that limits the the power of the government. But you have to go before the constitution and start at the Virginia constitution in the mid 1600's and all the federalist papers and so on to fully understand what the founders created. What you were taught in school, not even a smidgen of what was actually constructed.

[@brutusmaximus5380]

Correct. "You" is a debtor. The government doesn't protect people, it protects their estates by observing legal ownership of 14th amendment citizens.

[@Mr.greenthumb]

@brutusmaximus5380 i would love to have a sit down with you. Its hard to find anyone to talk about this subject matter because of illiteracy and getting insulted because of lack of understanding of language.

[@ebayguy38]

I don't identify as a person who consents to this video

[@nubsrevenge9726]

Yeah there's some major things wrong with this whole situation.

[@mute7116]

How can you be sovereign and a citizen?!

[@RussXodare]

You declare the institution to be trying you to be fraudulent, and seek redress from the "fraudulent" institution that appears to be exhibiting authority in a manner that is making you both implicitly and explicitly concur... He should declare duress - can't be worse than his current argument...

[@douglasbushong3920]

Regarding facing the accuser, doesn't the Crawford v. Washington provide a basis for the right to cross examine the accuser? It was a 9-0 decision. Knowing who the accuser isn't enough; you must be able to cross examine them.

[@TreR-eg2mg]

No. That case was about cross examining a witness IF the witness’ statement is presented.

[@colinfletcher5023]

More corporate cuver up

[@falaahblackwell1535]

I’m from the show me state.. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS A FOREIGN CORPORATION WITH RESPECT TO A STATE [emphasis added] Volume 20:Corpus Juris.. Who paid y’all to put this crap together

[@YoutubeGM206]

Thank you!

[@Whatdotheyhavetohide]

Giants were one thing the Titans are the ones I wanna see

[@maryalicebrooks7224]

i'm getting run over with litigious abuse and my small rural county finds it easier to just ignore it all than deal with him. let me know if you want to see the hearing video.....

[@carolchristiansen635]

The real question is, why doesn’t he change his name?

[@heatherclayton-callaghan4270]

He doesn't WANT ANY NAME !! But started off the trial using Darell Brooks as his name and closed the trial annou cing he his Darell Brooks. It was all a load of BS. A stupid fool pretending he was a learned counsellor.

[@BOMBORAZZ]

Breathe air!

[@awakenchildofgod5556]

Concept by the governed also everything you said is true the child has never had notice of there legal intity and it's the people not the state that is sovwrign and if he is a la yer he will know that code says that anyone that takes a oath of office relinquishes their citizenship and all municipalities and subdivisions become foreign land and foreign entity's no less anger citizen so just like d.c municipalities and anyone that takes an oath of office is not I repeat not a American citizen

[@tommyfoster4601]

It's funny because the "state" is the people defined legally. Not a for-profit business. But this business can press charges? Seems like you profit from people's ignorance and want to keep it that way.

[@joeblowjohndoe206]

I mean I agree with what the sovereign citizens say, but how is it working out for them? Lol

[@Whatdotheyhavetohide]

Coming from someone paid for going to court.. Hmmmm makes me skeptical & hardy too believe actor’s 😂

[@rud5101]

The people who study and practice law for years tend to have a pretty good understanding of the law.

[@blainebromfield8307]

His last words are funny enough. Legal is nonsense

[@invhincible2211]

he keeps saying his sovereign but also keeps crying about his rights being violated.. what a clown

[@falaahblackwell1535]

Knowing who your accusers are! This dude is playing word games. If someone say I lawfully owe them money.. By law I could take them to court and confront them with law proving I don’t

[@rud5101]

That would be a civil case. The 6th amendment only applies to criminal cases.

[@jackraintree4351]

So if he was hurt by some person he couldn't do anything about it

[@kcalmlux]

It’s called being a state national

[@michaelperussina2835]

Sovereign citizen is someone who honestly believes they can pick and choose from the constitution of this republic, while at the same time, not somehow being a citizen of it

[@roninmd]

All people who are born or domiciled in the 50 state alliance are known as American Nationals first. That is the original state of the people in "we the people" found in the constitution. The founders were not citizens to begin with. The constitution, a common law document, created the United States, in reality a corporate trust tasked with managing the commercial affairs between states and other nations. Congress then added the 14th amendment which was intended to grant civil rights for the offspring of freed slaves. Since the corporate U.S. has only commercial jurisdiction over citizens, it does not have authority over the natural rights or constitutional rights of U.S. Nationals. In fact, the right enumerated in the constitution is what limits the government from taking them. If you can prove that your state denied your rights protected by the constitution, you can sue the state at the Supreme Court level for breach of fiduciary duty but you must do so as an American National. As a citizen, your civil rights are privileges derived from corporate U.S. commercial jurisdiction. Privileges can be taken away by those who granted them. A constitutional right; however, can not be liened, a process of charging a customer for commercial use.

[@kyle6838]

He was and will continue be a fruit loop

[@blainebromfield8307]

They’re attorneys. Leading you to believe this as a United States Citizen.

[@Dynamatrix1973]

If you're born in the united states then you're a united states citizen. You can't just declare yourself a non citizen.

[@falaahblackwell1535]

The question is how do you harm the state.. The state is clearly a corporation, and only corporations could harm corporations.. Where is the injured party

[@rud5101]

Who is the injured party? How about the six people he killed and the 62 others he injured?

[@brandonlee3959]

​@rud5101 those injured people are the only ones who have the standing to sue him.....not the STATE who is a third party intervener.....

[@christopherlewis4595]

You really don't know what your talking about! The us is a corporation not a country. Your cereal number is on your social security card starting with an E. Maybe do more research

[@rud5101]

The "US is a corporation" thing comes from misreading a single section of a law dealing with federal agencies collecting debts and does not actually make the US a corporation. Research your own points.

[@awakenchildofgod5556]

What you all are talking about is federal questions about the constitutionality of most codes rules regulations exs.... Not lawy it does say the (consent of the govern) show is everyone the administrative courts in the constitution???? Please do what lawyers do is legislate job security and a good payday and he knows it I guarantee he doesn't think he's above the constitution but uses his position to bring up constitutionality of state laws?? Stop your defamation of his personal or person and yes the reason the name is in all caps is to separate the natural living,man from his business side which is called capitis diminutio Maxima m aning someone in bondage not spiritually alive the same goes for the sheriff meaning the sheriff is not his name but a legal fictional tital principal you can not give som one els a power or authority you don't have yourself that's check mate

[@badoof7803]

waukesha south hs class of 2021 entering the chat. darryll brooks is silly lol.

[@lisaespinosa7255]

I’m sorry but if they claim the law doesn’t apply to them then they should have no right to use the law on their behalf!!

[@mattbeckley9483]

Yes they want to say they arent american citizens but want acsess to rights that are provided for american citizens

[@millionairementormethod]

Wrong. They know that they are under Common Law and not Maritime or Martial Law. They don’t believe that laws don’t pertain to them. They follow Constitutional Law.

[@mattbeckley9483]

@@millionairementormethod lol ask darrel brooks how that bs worked for his case ps it didnt

[@rud5101]

​@@millionairementormethod They do believe that only the laws they agree with apply to them. And for people who supposedly follow Constitutional law, they have a very difficult time with the 10th Amendment.

[@Nutty2087]

It’s weird they believe they have all the rights as citizens but don’t have to follow any of the laws. They don’t believe in the courtrooms, judges etc but will still use them when suing people. Weird.

[@brutusmaximus5380]

What you consider law is actually a public policy of a corporation known as "State of [any of the 50 states]" which are subsidiary corporations of the United States. If you are not an employee of the corporation, then these 'laws" do not apply to you. When was the last time they paid you for driving your car? A police man is actually a policy enforcer. They aren't peace officers. Rights are organic and exist becuase you the man exists. Policies are man made and they only apply to the corporate person who is not you but a person consisting of 3 entities, your mother is the grantor, the state is the trustee, and you as a child are the beneficary.. Your birth certificate is evidence of that entity's creation. There's a reason why your name is in all capital letters. see UCC 1-201(10). It is the law telling you that you should hve known that birth certificate isn't you, and the people who enforce the law should have known it too because they are the trustees and are responible for the entity's bills.

[@awakenchildofgod5556]

The all caps name is there to sepreait the living man from the business name that is a fact the first time we see this used is to sepreait the living bi the from the creation of the birth certificate which shows the monetization of the child and gives them a estate or business to do business with the government with without such business, they do not think there amune to the law that don't exsist but what some educated people of the USA know that the supreme court has labeled the people of the United state to be sovierign not the state or government

[@nehyotv8488]

Mean while these two are both practicing to be officers of the court a BAR card admission is not a license its malarkey. The principals of law are few and never changing and dont require a bar card ... But i guess in the abundance of water a fool(s) is thirsty

[@pashahart8698]

Coercion...... the only way the government exists.......

[@clemtoe]

Yes. Also, on one end of the scale, you can be governed by unaccountable voodoo warlords or you can be governed by an accountable republic. Your third option is to go find a remote area far away from civilization to situate yourself and just be governed by grizzly bears, the elements and bandits. Saying that government = coercion is like saying that subtraction is adding positive and negative numbers. True. Not a novel insight.

[@rustomkanishka]

Monopoly on Violence.

[@johntrevy1]

Last time I checked that government was voted in.

[@rud5101]

If we didn't have any laws we wouldn't have a government, correct.

[@thelaurens1996]

Legal nonsense?! Yeah sure. Brook is right you know? You just gavent caught up with deeper reality yet.

[@rud5101]

He's so right he was found guilty on all charges.

[@shoblette961]

what's with the gen z editing, pause for breath please

[@sirbey9608]

You do have a right to confront or address your accuser so that you may settle the matter ... Someone needs their tuition reimbursed they don't know law Which is the constitution These people here only practice code and Statue enforcement. They funny 🤣😂🤣😂

[@golden-63]

He was given that right.

[@johntrevy1]

He did face the representative of his accuser, the DA. That is all that needs to happen.

[@rud5101]

Settling the matter, as in requesting a plea bargain? And nowhere in the 6th Amendment does it give the accused the right to confront their accuser. Also, codes and statutes are laws. If you understand the Constitution so well, you would know that the 10th Amendment gives states the power to write their own laws.

[@brandonlee3959]

​@@rud5101doesn't mean I have to follow them.....they have the power to regulate commerce.....that is the laws....no excuse me the "codes" they can create.

[@marlonthomas8042]

@@brandonlee3959you’re right it doesn’t mean you have to follow them, but it dies however mean you are likely to face the consequences for repeatedly not following them

[@mitchelsmith7076]

: [I can prove these persons talking in this video don’t have passed a second grade reading and writing level just ask them what a prepositional phrase is They don’t know anything that Follows a prepositional phrases is a fact if you don’t know what a prepositional phrase is you can never create a fact they’re smart guy and smart girl].

[@mw3309]

wow that grammar was awful by you lmao

[@rud5101]

How are you gonna accuse someone of reading at a second grade level when you're writing in all run-on sentences? Do you know what punctuation is?

[@Nobody13906]

My befriend believes this trash and I’m ready to break up with him over it. Has there been ANY successful sovereign cases won?

[@kapp1662]

Your boyfriend is very wise... You should listen

[@byrontownsel7274]

@@kapp1662 You’re a buffoon. No case has been won with Sovtard arguments.

[@byrontownsel7274]

No. There isn’t.

[@rud5101]

​@@kapp1662 Listen to the people who constantly lose in court?

[@brandonlee3959]

Your boyfriend should dump you and get someone who has a processing mind instead of processed mind......sorry he has to deal with u

[@FreedomToYourMind]

This is complete rubbish

[@DRodMuzicman]

Thank you 🙏 for verbalizing what we all know but couldn’t convey. Lol 👍

[@benorth0311]

Weird. Because I’ve watched live outta cams that say otherwise. I’ll get back to you about what his name is. But he has won his court cases, yes cases. Intriguing, thank you!

[@mw3309]

he.... He didn't win... are you just this dumb?