The T-14 Armata tank sucks

[@LazerPig]

Play World of Warships here: wo.ws/3lpmTRr Thank you World of Warships for sponsoring this video. During registration use the code LAZERPIG to receive a lot of rewards! Applicable to new users only.

[@anthonyking5563]

Let's go! Another video of Lazerpig giving us his wisdom!

[@thefelon8027]

no

[@gamera5160]

Your ad got interrupted by another ad in my watch through.

[@Allen667sjja]

Hey so I gave you my social security and my moms credit card number like you asked but I still haven’t received my free t shirt, what gives?

[@HorseshitDetectionAgency]

imagine playing that shitty ass P2W game for any reason.

[@arghanothername]

It’s the most powerful tank in the world; just one regiment could completely destroy the Russian economy.

[@royalhydra9790]

It would if the tank wasn’t just a glorified shopping cart with a glock glued to the handle

[@jurgenblick5491]

That is brilliant

[@shadoeboi212]

the Russian 1st Guard Tank Regiment had 83 tanks + aux and support vehicles. so its a tenth of a tank regiment destroyed the Russian economy

[@griffins750]

Lmao 😂

[@chad_dogedoge]

Hahaha

[@benjaminmatheny6683]

I love how all the footage of the T-14 driving has the turret rotating. Makes it look like it just does that when it moves. Like the turret controls are chained into the drive train.

[@talkingmudcrab718]

Maximum situational awareness.

[@M4rk58]

Its not a bug, it's a 'feature'

[@MostlyPennyCat]

So when it hits 88mph it takes off like a helichopper?

[@TheHacknor]

@@MostlyPennyCat Wouldn't be the first time they tried making a flying tank

[@retro.mp4558]

yeah, I very quickly starting singing Daft Punk after the video started

[@setenos2439]

I'm loving the fact that in 90% of the videos of the Armata in action the turret is just constantly spinning.

[@rigormoritz]

It's secretly a helicopter.

[@peterni2234]

@@rigormoritz SPEEeeEeeEeEeeEeeEreEeeN

[@Armybob]

T-14 joystick drift confirmed.

[@GeigerMotorsports]

Its legend is. It’s turret is attached to the drivetrain. Tank move turret move.

[@pxlcowpxl6166]

1:19 The propagandists who filmed this didn't seem to know how bad the stabilizer is on the Armata. That gun can't hit an apartment building while on the move lol.

[@NotAGepard]

I swear, the anti technology crowd would look at a new (hypothetical) German active protection system and claim it was to expensive, to mechanically unreliable, and just to make generals rich, while a Russian one is reliable, cheap, and is designed for war, even though the Russian one is expensive, mechanically unreliable, and designed by Ural just because they wanted to brag about it and make a ton of money. Meanwhile that German one is extreamly reliable and its design started work in 2004. Through those 20 or so years, they made it cheaper, more reliable, built for every combat situation, and even has a combat record from 2012 that is pretty good considering that was a prototype in a shitty situation: urban warfare. The report also describes long range combat, and it apparently intercepted a Milan missle. Now with 12 more years of development it is one of the best APS’s out there. Now how can that be a “bad system”? It isn’t.

[@voodoovince8001]

That's because the anti-tech crowd are too stupid or too Left or Right to commit the brainpower required to do more than waste oxygen.

[@andremrh7690]

They said the Germans could not make it smaller and more accurate...they were wrong.

[@thejuiceking2219]

what? don't you know that russians are genetically incapable of feeling greed?

[@lyinarbaeldeth2456]

That moment in the T-14 propaganda documentary where they're all "Look, the newest French tank has an autoloader, NATO is desperately trying to catch up!" My man, the French have been putting autoloaders in their tanks since the 1950s. It's kind of their thing.

[@karotgamin790]

maybe even the 40s 💀💀💀 idk though

[@weldonwin]

@@karotgamin790 Not really in the 40's, since the French didn't really have a tank industry at all in the late 40's following WW2, which is why the French army was, for a time, equipped with German Panther tanks... which they HATED with a passion, both as a symbol of the occupation and for its teeth-shatteringly bad mechanical problems

[@Pratt_]

​@@weldonwinexactly, and a fun fact that tend to piss off the wehraboo quite a lot is that the Panther actually served in the French army for longer than in the Wehrmacht and they did all the objective comparisons to the other Western tanks (especially the Sherman). I insist on the objective, proof being that they loved 75mm from the Panther so much that they modified it and put in the AMX-13.

[@DevDog98]

"that means they are at least 50 years behind us" the us: you took the words right out my mouth 😉

[@ebperformance8436]

The T-14 has a top secret weapon…..when hit with a shell, it will be able to launch its turret into orbit, we beat you Americans in the space race’ Now we will do it again! We will have The first turret to land on the moon. The M1A2 Abrams will never achieve that’ the M1A2 Abrams can only run over mines with little to no damage. Not impressed….Comrade Pooptin is a stable genius. We also upgraded the T-72 with a Kamikaze feature. We run them into the enemy tank….before it Spontaneously combust. It also can launch a Turret at the enemy….they fly high.

[@valentinaskazimieras]

I'll never forget when Putin said "It's Armata time" and armated all over Ukraine

[@javierrck18]

Top quality comment over here!

[@jacplac97]

The joke gets a little poor in taste if you know Polish. (Armata means "cannon" in Polish)

[@thetau4866]

​@jacplac97 still accurate when you realize the russians main tactic is essentially attempting to draw the enemy into artillery fire which is all Russia seems to be good at.

[@stevenortiz9008]

@@thetau4866 i would die if an artillery shell landed next to me

[@thetau4866]

@@stevenortiz9008 I think we all would.

[@FirstLast-cg2nk]

If the Amata doesn't have a nickname yet, I propose "The Trophy Wife": It doesn't go anywhere, it seldom works (if ever), it doesn't do anything except waste its daddy's money, but daddy keeps it around because it is nice to look at and it makes him feel like he's 20 again.

[@Solo-Wng-Pixy]

You my good sir have earn my like XD

[@baronvonlimbourgh1716]

👍😂

[@saltydog4333]

Yep. That's it's new nickname. It's official 😂

[@txlyons2937]

Fucking brilliant, mate.

[@jameson1239]

If NATO did reporting names for Tanks then this is what it should be

[@feartheamish9183]

A tank so amazing at combat, they stopped making it when a war started. Looked around and grabbed as many 60 year old tanks they could.

[@dmvsye]

Because FPV drones can easily kill both 60 year old and modern tanks, I think they're not taking any risks since they're so dangerous and no one thought about small drones seriously in modern warfare

[@feartheamish9183]

@StrontiumXC yeah because FPV drones weren't a widely used thing during the first year of the war.

[@dmvsye]

@@feartheamish9183 Bro y'all just don't think why would they send expensive and unproven t-14s when they already have less expensive and more combat proven tanks like the t-90? Using t14s would also need crews to be retrained. Just think about it is the US sending M1A2s to ukraine? There's no need to send them since the older ones are doing perfectly fine. Same goes for russia.

[@TheImperialSoviet]

@@dmvsye While the T-90 and other T-series units of tanks, there is no doubt that in a one-on-one confrontation with a modern tank - say the Israeli Merkaba or the German Leopard 2 - the modern tank will emerge victorious in such a battle. The United States does not truly need to send tanks to the conflict in question, however that isn't to say they don't need to send aiding firepower to Ukraine. However, should the United States send any variation of the Abrams tank, it would surely trample any Russian force if Ukrainian tank crews are properly trained and the vehicles are granted full logistical support. Although this itself is not without risks; the United States has sent almost entirely defensive aid; tanks, specifically main battle tanks such as the Abrams, are primarily offensive weapons, and thus should never be donated unless the fall of Ukraine is on the line, and by proxy, Eastern Europe.

[@Stunkos]

@@dmvsye The US sending M1A1s instead of A2s was because they didn't have any A2's ready to go since the US still uses that model. So they just took some A1s they had in storage, stripped the DU armor out of them, touched them up and sent them over. But they wouldn't do this for their own soldiers because there's no point when you have better everything in the A2. The *only* reason T-14s have never seen combat is because it would be too embarrassing for Russia to lose one since their culture and government is based around saving face. The US is still planning on sending A2s as well but the A1s were meant to hold them over.

[@emperorkane317]

>Russia and China reveal a super advanced vehicle that they claim is decades ahead of anything NATO has >NATO gets nervous and in response creates numerous hyperadvanced countermeasures for use against said vehicle 2 years later >Turns out Chinese or Russian super advanced vehicle either doesn't exist or wasn't as advanced as they claimed. >Accidentally makes NATO decades more advanced then before.

[@09csr]

that is the issue with postering and deceptions: while it CAN scare away some potential rivals, it might trigger a development race, and obviously Russia couldn't quite keep it up. Imagine what an uncorrupt Russia could have done.

[@Dman6779]

@@09csr an un corrupt russia would've ended very poorly for ukraine so we're lucky in that regard

[@darthtripedacus1]

It can also bankrupt your opponent. Gotta play all the angels

[@emperorkane317]

@@darthtripedacus1 I highly doubt they could make the U.S. go bankrupt. The U.S. is pretty good at bouncing back from recessions

[@codercrisYT]

That's the funny part Russia keeps making NATO stronger, Putin gave us way more border land with Russia thanks to Finland and Sweden joining the NATO wave it wouldn't have happened if he wouldn't have invaded, now we wait for the Ukraine to win and allow them in as well 😭

[@kommanderc7208]

The russian army is large and modern. The only issue is that large parts aren't modern, and the modern parts aren't large.

[@williamkarbala5718]

So... Russia is Italy in the 40s?

[@tomx5551]

yes we all see, indeed 🤔

[@اسكندرفكار]

@@williamkarbala5718 Italy in the 40's neither had the numbers nor the tech

[@Orwelliandissident]

Someone's been watching Perun it would seem. He said this verbatim during his last video.

[@Tobichiii]

lmao

[@petersmythe6462]

"India restarting its inhouse tank comedy program, the Arjun." A cruel but accurate description.

[@a.h.1358]

Their true joke is INSAS…

[@FirstMetalHamster]

That would be another great topic for a video.

[@diggraver2929]

ARJUN WILL SMITE ALL ENEMYS! ALL COWER IN FEAR BEFORE ARJUN!

[@Katharina-rp7iq]

Hey, the indians might get somewhere in 50 years! Russia...might have a t95 by then!

[@m-seb]

It can't be worse than the in house aviation tragedy, the Tejas. Can it?

[@XboxProdigy1]

The bit about the Bradley disabling the T14's optics with the autocannon aged like a fine fucking whiskey.

[@Ozzy08018]

Did it actually happen! Please tell me it actually happened!

[@iamhere6893]

​@@Ozzy08018It did, some months ago now, in the Winter. Look it up. The footage is glorious (captured by a drone above)

[@karotgamin790]

A T-90’s optics got obliterated by a bradley crew… so not too far off

[@ShortCardinalsFan262]

​​@@Ozzy08018 Bradleys have destroyed T90s with 25mm. Its on video and its hilarious 😂

[@nomar5spaulding]

​@Ozzy08018 A Bradley didn't do it to an Armata, but it really could as shown by the pair of Ukrainian Bradleys that took down a T-90 in a point blank engagement by blinding it and then just pounding the disoriented tank into submission with their Bushmasters.

[@KPW2137]

Thing about Smykałka - it's not only in Russia, you can find it in most of the former Soviet Bloc countries. On one hand, it is genuine. It was kind of necessary to find ways around obstacles you found in the everyday life. On the other hand - it means finding solutions to problems not known in the West anymore. It's just like one of the best quotes I've ever heard about the army and morale: The army that is well organised and up to the task doesn't have heroes - because it does not need them to get the job done.

[@GorFrag]

don't need to spend thousands on a zero G nasa pen, just use a pencil. watch as graphite dust shorts out your space capsule.

[@bosermann4963]

here's another funny quote about heroes: a hero will disarm one landmine. a professional will disarm hundreds. it's funny if your sense of humor is dark enough...

[@trolleriffic]

@@GorFrag And gets in your eyes, and your lungs... Which is why both the Soviets and Americans used wax pencils didn't they? I don't know where the myth about the pens came from other than being a lame attempt at a joke.

[@jamietaylor5570]

@@trolleriffic IIRC at some point NASA had propelling (graphite) pencils made that didn't require gravity for the mechanism to work properly, but I don't know if they ever actually used them in space.

[@connorhughes7928]

​@@bosermann4963 Love it😂

[@turdferguson9190]

Literally anyone pulls out a camera... T14: "I'll try spinning, thats a good trick!"

[@BiggestCorvid]

​@@Vode1234 I'm sure it will start flying should it ever see combat. Yes I inow about the blowout panels I assume they will be welded shut because that's pretty common for Russia.

[@BiggestCorvid]

Seriously, everyone on the Kursk died bc they couldn't weld the torpedoes right but they were sure to weld the emergency buoy panel shut.

[@CommanderBeefDev]

@@Vode1234 i giggled

[@kennedyshotfirst2534]

Russian drivers always spin

[@BiggestCorvid]

@@kennedyshotfirst2534 true story- December 2012 I'm in Northern russian city. I'm with Austrian chick who prefers to take actual licensed taxi, because safer. Licensed taxi asks her if she likes skiing. Then he asks if we've ever seen a car ski? He proceeds to do donuts on the ice in a mostly empty Lenta parking lot. He laughs and I smell alcohol. Her nails break the flesh on my wrist. I hope he got mobilized, not all Russians are shit but no tears for that guy.

[@Dominator150395]

The "Smekalka" part of this video reminds me of the anecdote about the "Russian Space Pen", where, upon discovering that regular ballpoint pens cannot write in zero gravity, the Americans spent millions of dollars developing a pen that can write in zero G, upside-down, underwater, etc... and the Russians gave their cosmonauts pencils. It's a story so old and tired that even its rebuttal has become cliche: *both* the Russians and the Americans had tried using pencils, the Americans replaced them with "space pens" because they didn't want graphite dust getting into the electronics and fucking them up... and the Russians ended up buying the American space pens as well.

[@trevorgough2286]

That true ??

[@tishafeed8085]

@@trevorgough2286 the story? as someone whose first language is russian i've heard it a lot

[@fools_opinions]

Plus the super expensive space pen was developed and made independently of NASA and offered to them at a price below cost because the person who started the project wanted to help out the space program. But that does make for a less catchy anecdote.

[@alaric_3015]

​@@fools_opinions don't forget that is how R&D works at the end of the day it will ends up commercially successful anyway not so much of a capitalism's failure isn't it

[@stanbinary]

Smekalka --> mental coping mechanism and deep expression of the misery of Russian life. Always looking for easy way out rather than deeply investing incremental innovation.

[@fjavier90]

Russia has just called off production of this monstrosity. LP was right, it was shite all along.

[@ToabyToastbrot]

Can you point me to a source for this? I couldn't find any articles on this from this year. (not that anyone is talking about that thing, but I'm curios)

[@ArmedSpaghet]

@@ToabyToastbrotI found one from Yahoo news how they talk about it being waaaay too expensive to use.

[@mattmopar440]

​@@ToabyToastbrotthe Deputy Prime Minister I believe mentioned it on Russian news media a few weeks ago about how they canceled the project and are focusing on T90 production

[@Voschane]

@@mattmopar440 He said they'd focus on the T-90 still as the T-14 is expensive and there isn't a need for it yet, in the exact same article he also says it's in service and never said it was cancelled .

[@BenersantheBread]

@@Voschane So it's cancelled. They're clearly trying to postpone the official cancellation for PR. They weren't using any and only made a handful when it was supposedly in full production.

[@azndood]

Fun fact about the M1 Abrams, it's governed to 45 MPH. If the treads were able to withstand the punishment, the engine could propel the tank up to speeds to 62 MPH.

[@scottsbarbarossalogic3665]

That is terrifying

[@RipOffProductionsLLC]

How much you want to bet that if the Ukrainians get their hands on an Abrams before the war ends that they're going to be removing those limiters and do something insane... It might nit be a good idea, it might not end well, but it will be fucking cool to watch.

[@themeddite]

I suddenly don't want to see a Tank going 60mph

[@RipOffProductionsLLC]

Why is my previous comment missing? Can anyone else see it?

[@themeddite]

@@RipOffProductionsLLC KZbin, its a glitch

[@weldonwin]

I love how almost every shot of the T-14, has the turret spinning round and round, as if one of the crew has leant on the traversing lever by accident, the handle has instantly broken and now they can't stop it endlessly spinning as if it were trying to achieve lift-off

[@trolleriffic]

Swap gun barrel for pair of rotor blades and you have first helicopter/MBT hybrid. Genius design.

[@no.7893]

I'm wondering if in order to save costs on the electric motors that would be needed to turn the turret they instead just connected the turret to the drive shaft and the gunner aims by having the driver move fowards and backwards.

[@jamietaylor5570]

@@no.7893 Nah, the gunner just has to press the button at exactly the right time...

[@RunawayTrain2502]

@@trolleriffic Mike Sparks would love it.

[@bobbobson3616]

@@trolleriffic the Russians already have a space shuttle/t80 hybrid...

[@svenhermans8218]

Legend says that if you hook up a power cable to the T-14, you get unlimited power because the turret also works as a generator.

[@Whydidimakethisa]

No, it’s just a giant crank flashlight.

[@soos1885]

I expected "world of ducks" at the beginning

[@analex4044]

Smekalka

[@abmong]

T-14 was conceived as a Helicopter

[@thesummerthatwas76]

The blind are at an advantage in this regard

[@aceonp1uto]

I figure by now you have heard that the Russians have officially stated this tank is done as it's too expensive. They said the T90 is plenty advanced enough to do the job.

[@riktor3005]

"It can't reverse." That's a feature, not a bug. They don't want the tanks to be able to retreat.

[@atomicskull6405]

Like the Sontaran's weak point.

[@theredscourge]

Either that or they don't know how to implement a reverse gear in a transmission the size of a tank without it breaking

[@dm121984]

@@theredscourge "Why not both?"

[@riktor3005]

@@theredscourge Well, they are also apparently "hydraulically sealed" inside said tank that cannot reverse. Sounds a whole lot like their commanders don't want them to retreat or escape.

[@whiskywolff]

French background noises uuuhh lalala messie

[@Just_a_turtle_chad]

I once knew a Russian who moved to Scotland who had previously served in the Russian military. He ended up working at Burger King he said Burger King was better organised and had better supplies than the Russian army. He also said the Russian military couldn't even organise a piss up in brewery.

[@trolleriffic]

In fairness the organisation and logistics of these big companies are probably better than most militaries, but Russia's must be especially bad, if not third world.

[@missivory_missraine]

@@trolleriffic Well when you're a for profit company...logistics is the bane of your existence. Bad logistics = death of profits. Militaries can play with lead times, dates, and shipments for when you need it to happen.

[@JohnFrumFromAmerica]

To be fair fast food chains have very good organization

[@MarcosElMalo2]

@@JohnFrumFromAmerica this might be an exaggeration, but isn’t one of the hallmarks is that everything you need to know how to manage and run a franchise is contained in a three ring binder. You can take an average-intelligence schmuck off the street and have him managing your franchise within a month. It’s all a fine tuned process.

[@jiggy6486]

Might be deja vu, but you already said this under the Moskva video

[@matthewlove2473]

I can't believe Russia built a tank that needs to rotate its turret constantly in order to move.

[@MrJstorm4]

It's got a gear that drives the tank forward when the turret rotates. This allows a tank to reuse electricity that would otherwise be wasted, which improves fuel economy." -pg. 463 "An extremely reliable history of post sovit environmental law and regulation", A Dude Who Oughta be Trusted, 2017

[@somevaultdwelleridunno1750]

It’s like it needs to be handcranked in order to move.

[@Тарас-у7к]

It's kinda half tank half helicopter

[@h.r.hufnstuf4171]

its wind-up operated, you have to spin the turret back the other way to go again

[@tylerreed610]

The turret spinning is what turns the engine and powers the tracks

[@sdcoinshooter]

Called the T-14 because they can only afford to build 14 of them.

[@corn1971]

It’s aged better than a dozen T-14 tanks that can’t even take part in Russia’s war.

[@touringwagen]

The documentary guy was sweaty because: A) the AC doesn't work B) the cameraman had a gun on him C) the "hydraulic hatch" failed the last time and they had to reshoot Pick one or all, your call.

[@idk.k467]

D) his brain got r*ped, but yes ALL OF THEM

[@Z.O.M.G]

All of the above

[@colincampbell767]

Air conditioners in a tank are a waste of time. There is simply too much thermal radiation coming off the hull. In summer in the desert - no air conditioner can keep up with the heat radiating of the armor into the tank. A far more effective solution is to have the crewmembers wear vests that have cool air flowing through them. (Cool the person, not 10-20 tons of steel.)

[@samuelscott-schroeder8597]

Yes.

[@ebperformance8436]

Ac is a waste…the T-14 has a blowout sun roof, when hit, the turret flys high. The T stands for T Top….when the T-14 is towed to the front lines, it will be joining the Turret flying Olympics,

[@diegobecerrafuentes2673]

Im from Mexico My music teacher moved from Russia about 20 years ago Whilst trying to put some of her papers in check, they (she and her family) moved back to Russia in 2019 They were still in Russia when the pandemic started, and were unable to leave the country They finally moved back to Mexico in late 2021 (We have classes with her on Fridays) I remember the 24 of February of 2022, a Thursday We received a message that we wouldn’t have her class the next day, as she was grieving the death of her cousin, who died in the opening assault of the war Life is hard

[@PasserMontanus]

He should have just stayed in russia.

[@XXXivan1618XXX]

@@PasserMontanus yep, exactly!

[@vibechecktsundere4912]

I think as much as it’s interesting to follow the war and root for Ukraine’s continued independence, we ought to acknowledge the men being sent to die by Putin. There’s a very real human cost and the waste of Russian lives is yet another reason to hate Putin and the current hellhole that is the Russian government

[@ariza7654]

​@@PasserMontanus you literally cant avoid conscription

[@clutchsaboteur1118]

@@ariza7654 Would rather take my chances and go hide somewhere and potentially starve or freeze to death then go help commit war crimes and atrocious acts

[@lucienfury2606]

The T14 is so top secret that the designers dont even know much about it!

[@user-hi3cw6vc9j]

Man, that’s some real good secrecy

[@waltergoodwin7463]

You and silicone valley have made my night while I lay her in the VA hospital. Can not stop laughing. Thanks!

[@Bestnightcoreofalltime]

„Oh we can melt through one meters of steel ? That’s cool“

[@321GhostRider123]

It's so secret that they forget where the production plant is, thats why we see not a whole army of them xD

[@MrReymoclif714]

Hilarious.

[@tuckern.3534]

Did LazerPig predict the Bradley T-90 fight lol. He was spot on.

[@abradabk]

He missed the fact the Bradley operator know what to do from games... "butt" that can have something to do with the sponsor of this video

[@MiishaKorvian]

​@abradabk this video pre-dates that engagement. However he stated that it's a tactic Bradley crews are trained for. Thus if you know where the optics are, which crews are typically taught anyways, you'll know what to do.

[@surpriseandterror9698]

Get World of Tank'd nerd

[@Flaruwu]

@@surpriseandterror9698 It was probably war thunder, world of tanks doesn't have both the bradley and t90.

[@AHHHHHHHH21]

​@@Flaruwunor actual weak spots that do anything

[@AusFirewing]

It's funny how the T-14 is praised for being a 'modular' design that can be used to build a whole fleet of vehicles when the F-35 was ruthlessly shat on for the exact same reason.

[@CallanElliott]

Despite the level of modularity being much less, primarily breaking down to engine variations and mission specific weapon loadouts and (I'm not sure, but wouldn't surprise me) software packages.

[@UTcommando]

@@CallanElliott Oh, so nearly any MBT in existence then, essentially. xD

[@andycockrum1212]

The F35 is fuckin sick though

[@chaos.....]

@@andycockrum1212 damn yeah, its pretty cool

[@RounderRounder]

An Armata can turn into an APC, can an F35 become an airliner? No? Checkmate F35, completely useless.

[@skorza212]

Say what you want about the T-14, that bastard can pointlessly spin it’s turret in promotional material like nothing else

[@poopshiestyreal]

if it spins fast enough once the autoloader gets blown up, the turret will fly into the air like a helicopter rotor, making for extra artillery as the decapitated turret flies towards the enemy. truly russian engineering is decades ahead

[@hostomelhorsehoarder]

If it was back in the 1500s it might actually be viable

[@jacevicki]

@@poopshiestyreal now you're thinking with smekalka!

[@poopshiestyreal]

hahahha 🤣that's a good one@@jacevicki

[@filippaustralovenator2.033]

Yep, why do tanks even have that feature...) Western commies must quickly "progress" to motionless turrets, like some nordic swedish "tanks".) No autoloader is also fine, grunts can do that.)))

[@Eisenthorn4179]

After watching this video, we can understand that the T-14 turret does spin 360 degrees.

[@2009dudeman]

Glad to see the fixed the problem with the turret unscrewing itself, as is common on western tanks and excavators. If your turn the cab left 4 times you must be sure to turn right 4 times to recenter the ring in the threads.

[@FlameDarkfire]

"The West will be quaking in it's boots seeing we can hit them from ANY angle!" -Some Vatnik

[@wyattarthur5275]

@@2009dudeman Is this even real? Just asking because you would be surprised how many tanks don't have any threads and just use the tanks own weight to keep the turret on why some of them just lift right off

[@3xoticG4m3r]

@@wyattarthur5275 he was just joking :)

[@wyattarthur5275]

@@3xoticG4m3r I didn't know because I wouldn't be shocked if someone actually made a tank with a stupid design that actually unscrewed itself I have seen worce

[@GekkeHenkie1313]

To the Z trolls. A year later now. You told us the t14 would roll over the Ukraine is a few days. But uhhh, Kursk, belgorod 😅 Do you still believe in the godlike status of the t14?

[@balaclavabob001]

They still believe in the god like status of Tsar pooptin after 625,000 losses and billions of dollars spent that could have been used to drag russia out of the 1830s ? There is no hope for these people .

[@rimanahbvee]

Uh they will just say youre falling from nato/ukraine propaganda or smth

[@kaikideishuu7068]

You forgot to mention the flight capabilities of the T-14, why else would they spin the turret at all time that way ?

[@urbansekkt6355]

I wonder if they will come with speakers blasting some russian variant of "fortunate son" when VTOL mode is activated

[@flunox]

Its because they put a washing machine chip on it, so it think its doing its spin cycle.

[@auraeliuswrinn3756]

omfg if they ever figure out how to mount props on that turret we're all doomed

[@otsigo]

You cant sneak up on a tank that constantly checks it's own rear. Either that or it's a how the radar prox works for the active defense system works.

[@spoonerman]

​@@flunox hahahaha good one 🤣

[@maxstepaniuk4355]

Best stealth tank in the world. Even its developers still can't find it.

[@davidschneider9145]

Can’t spot and destroy the tank if it doesn’t make it to the front lines. Truly innovative

[@sodiumfluoridel]

this made me exhale through my nose

[@tmitch5845]

🤣Well played!!

[@enderjed2523]

Reminds me of when the Americans lost the T28 tank destroyer in a bush.

[@sophisthemlock246]

Russia is always 3 steps ahead. Unfortunately they have no idea where they are going

[@ecyor0]

You aren't concerned about the T-14 because you've done your research. I'm not concerned about the T-14 because this video is the first time I've heard about it. We are not the same.

[@SomeBody-rm6hf]

This nigga has done no research, only a few dozen of these exist.

[@lazzie7495]

​@@KashtanGreg Do you have any evidence to disprove him?

[@Ordoscc]

​@@KashtanGreg All hail the God-Tsar! You receive a 1 week delay to Vuhledar-frontline duty!

[@kingarthur9310]

@@lazzie7495 He was very wrong about claiming the Engine was a copy of the Sla 16 that he said was used in the Porsche Tiger. The Tiger P used two V10 engines. At 25:22 in the video

[@Omegacalgar]

​@@kingarthur9310 I can see why he got it wrong. VK 45.01 P uses the Porsche Type 101 engine. The Porsche Type 203 engine also known as the Sla 16 is the engine that was going to replace the Type 101 for the VK 45.02 P, the other Porsche Tiger that wasn't made.

[@h.a.9880]

58:50 aged great, given that two Bradleys managed to tag-team a T-90M on short range into submission lol.

[@h.a.9880]

@icezinho_Desperate and childish cope of the lowest quality. But sure, the Bradleys didn't "destroy" the T-90M, they merely mauled it to a point that it could not fight back, had no idea what was going on and then fled in a panic until it hit a tree, got stuck and the crew bailed out with soiled pants. The Bradleys didn't "kill" the T-90M, they merely rendered it useless, defenseless and ultimately _harmless._ Point still stands: Bradleys took the field and won, T-90M sucks ass, russia is a fascist shithole and you're a fool for defending it.

[@mattmopar440]

@icezinho_ he never said they destroyed it so not sure where your getting the quotes from

[@SIRUNOWN]

​​@icezinho_ The Bradleys rendered the T90 combat ineffective, blind and stuck. That's a win for the Bradleys, however you slice it. On a battlefield disabled is as good as destroyed it the enemy cannot retrieve the asset.

[@SIRUNOWN]

@icezinho_ and? It was disabled before it was destroyed, it was rendered combat ineffective by the Bradleys. No matter how you slice it disabling the tank is a win for the Bradleys, it was blind and stuck before the drone finished it off, a blind and stuck tank can't fight. The Bradleys caused that, that's a win for the Bradley.

[@SIRUNOWN]

@icezinho_ Like can you not read or something? I didn't claim the Bradleys 'destroyed' the T90, disabling an opponent's asset in combat is just as good as a kill, potentially even better if it can be captured.

[@brandynstahler5266]

imagine being a marine or something and your squad comes across an abaondoned t-14, excitedly you rush towards it to unveil it's secrets and to your astonishment you crack it open and there's a Tiger I engine in there

[@RS-nk7bd]

It's so much worse. Thats the engine of the not approved Porsche Tiger.

[@trololoev]

and abandoned tank just move but they own, because all t-14 can do it.

[@patavinity1262]

@@RS-nk7bd Even worse: a crappy Soviet copy of the Porsche Tiger engine designed to power quarrying machinery.

[@Gleaves]

​@@patavinity1262 even worse: canceled, but eventually made into production inferior crappy soviet copy of Porche's Tiger engine. Now with 30% more vodka flavor

[@xtragoose]

Imagine being a Ukrainian grandad hooking a T-14 up to tow away with your tractor and realising it's got exactly the same engine as the German tanks you helped your granddad tow away with his tractor in the 40's

[@Consequator]

I love how you constantly see those tanks spinning their turrets around in full circles like they're playing helicopter.

[@joevicmeneses8918]

looks to me sooner or later the turret would toss up.

[@emuoverlord1635]

It's frustrating me and I don't know why 😂

[@lupisvolk2420]

@@emuoverlord1635 Some cases it's because the turret broke.

[@emuoverlord1635]

@@lupisvolk2420 that would not surprise me in the least, they look like a cartoon tank that would helicopter away

[@GhitaTheOutLaw]

Because is what it does the best. C'mon it was designed on Большой театр for the Not Cracker ballet

[@krisfrederick5001]

The Armata is absolutely, without any question or doubt. The single most expensive, powerful, parade float in military history.

[@generalfun_videos387]

This is gold right here

[@hologaming6163]

And can only be used a very limited amount of times😂

[@SmokePoppa]

nah... The Russian navy holds a parade every time they leave port.

[@twitchykun]

man it fails at that as well, we didn't see it at the last parade

[@NayrAnur]

Well, at least the turret spins. 😂

[@ThePolecatProcess]

59:03 You predicted this to a T, except it was a T-90M not T-14 Armata. Posted 5 days after 2 Bradley’s disabled and defeated a T-90M on January 12th, 2024 Oh, hello there, back to edit this. They didn’t use TOW missiles either, just guns. Also, I corrected the date from 2023 to 2024.

[@MightyGachiman]

Shows the amount of research this guy does

[@W4lt3r89]

@@MightyGachiman Kind of funny that they interviewed one of the Bradley crews, the gunner stating that he recalled weak spots from video games. War Thunder biting Russia in the ass is amusing.

[@shcdemolisher]

@@W4lt3r89 Especailly when you have tons of military spec guys wanting the most amount of accurate details in a game that is as closest to a military sim as you can get. And sharing top secret specs that will land them in legal hot water.

[@stevencarrollscorpio]

..... And if two Bradley's has destroyed your tank, follow the advice of two infamous fighter pilots "go home and rethink your choices in life".

[@ThePolecatProcess]

@@stevencarrollscorpio kind of a major skill issue on the Russians part.

[@granatmof]

Israel has an ifv based on out of merkava tank hulls. But Israel is a special case: they're relatively small, they don't need to move the vehicles around very much, and they need to conserve their smaller population of soldiers. Also I really love how the videos of the T14s feature turrets just spinning like a bored gamer.

[@Silverized84]

and the barrel tremble because their stab sucks. The Leo can rotate with a beer on the barrell and not spill it

[@Agm1995gamer]

about the merkava and namer apc it is forbidden for the IDF to drive them on public roads. besides patrolling the border, whenever they need to move long distances they just use semi trucks to deliver 2 at a time.

[@quentintin1]

@@Agm1995gamer that's hardly something new they don't drive them on public roads because they are crap and will break under the weight of the machine and everyone trucks their armour to AO, or rail them if possible, it saves on fuel, parts and maintenance

[@Agm1995gamer]

@@quentintin1 yup, those are the reasons.

[@SilencerGDA]

​@@Silverized84 wasnt there videos about challenger 2 as well doing this?

[@leighburne4098]

"DO YOU WANT TO BE HYDRAULICALLY SEALED INTO A TANK?!!" Choked on the breakfast I was eating.

[@thebadshave503]

What? You don't want to be locked in a dead tank in the bottom of a frozen Ukrainian river with no power and a tow vehicle that exists only on a napkin in the Urals while figuring out who should shoot themselves first like a community theatre version of the Kursk?

[@sharkybate7115]

​@@thebadshave503 I think this was the best comment I've read all day, thank you

[@BOTmaster15]

well considering that Russian crews are abandoning their vehicles, this isn't stupid. Crew cant run if hydraulic system wont let them :D

[@dorktriogamer2865]

@@BOTmaster15 hahahaha

[@EstParum]

​@@BOTmaster15thats smart

[@TravelerZ24]

One day lazerpig will have enough and raid the Bovington tank museum and break through the walls of the Kremlin in a crusader

[@dylfai]

And loot the Kubinka tank museum as well!

[@phluphie]

Like James Bond in "Goldeneye"?

[@chefboyardee2223]

Will he take it through the channel tunnel?

[@kikidevine694]

He's going to visit the museum in Russia where they keep all the WW2 tanks .....and find they all ended up being sent to Ukraine.

[@TravelerZ24]

@@phluphie James Pork

[@holdenroberts6973]

The brain drain issue really interests me. Russia regularly produces engineers, physicists, chemists, etc that can compete with those raised in America. And they do compete. But they do so from within America's borders instead of Russia's. Because their best and brightest are smart enough to see through the propaganda telling them that because they're Russian, they must be fine with living in poverty because they're arbitrarily tougher or something.

[@StalkTheHype]

It's been going on since the 1920ies. They have had a brain drain for over a century now lmao

[@NunofyaFB]

“If you don’t see it, they don’t have it” Is something more people need to hear whenever some russian wunderwaffe makes headlines (I’m looking at you, poseidon torpedo)

[@w_elder2199]

true

[@danielsurvivor1372]

Does same apply to China?

[@w_elder2199]

@@danielsurvivor1372 close your eyes bro, they do not have any fleet bro, just close your eyes, ok?

[@deriznohappehquite]

@@danielsurvivor1372 probably, but China has actually demonstrated a lot of post-Soviet capabilities.

[@drmaulana2600]

@@danielsurvivor1372 sadly no, AFAIK Chinese stuffs didnt require much hype as russian one, like remember J35, the first time we as an outsider see it as leaked photos during its testing phase, not as a mockup on defense shows. same goes to J20, the first thing we see that in a leaked satellite shot, and again, not as wooden mockup in defense shows or a crappy CGI shot for an advert. and also, J20 are already operational while Su57 is still in testing phase, J35 was ready for service but PLAN reject it while Su75 is still in design phase.

[@meckerhesseausfrankfurt4019]

"The rule of thumb with Russia is: If you don't see it, they don't have it"... couldn't have said it better myself

[@Mike23443]

Nukes doko? 👀

[@iridosminer]

say hello to the Abrams and a Bradley destroyed by the lancet

[@AHHHHHHHH21]

​@@iridosminerok yes, we all have losses on every side. A T-90M got disabled by 2 Bradleys that weren't even running proper ammunition to take it down, never mind that it's main gun isn't even supposed to kill tanks in the first place.

[@nightmarepotato5000]

@@iridosminer Okay, what does that have to do with Russia not having things it claims ?

[@Feanor6450]

​​@@iridosminer Yes the Abrams, singular. Now say hello to the thousands of t72s, t80s and hundreds of t90s destroyed by javelins and similar missiles.

[@ferdinandthagaard5341]

American tanks: they/them Russisk tanks: was where Pure genius

[@AlechiaTheWitch]

Here/over there

[@concept5631]

​@@AlechiaTheWitch Every/where

[@AlechiaTheWitch]

@@concept5631 was/where

[@ReesesCupsable]

When even the Chinese think your product is cheap and inferior you know you’re in trouble!

[@thepeoplescheese7594]

Red effect

[@Rivoli1799]

@@thepeoplescheese7594 what

[@seushimarejikaze1337]

@@Rivoli1799 basically thepeoplescheese7594 says that almost all information in this video is either misinformation (or worse, propaganda). other youtuber, that has alias RedEffect posted 50 min long video, correcting all errors that LazerPig committed in his "misinformed" video, by using actual knowledge and sources not hunches, personal opinions and wishful thinking... its also laughtable that the only error, that LazerPig admitted to, is saying that Honda Jazz generates more torque that t-34 engine V-2, which is total bullshit (like most of this video).

[@alyaartzz8998]

China: don't worry Russia. I can give some of my tanks if u lose too mick tanks

[@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx]

@@Rivoli1799 “The T-14 armata uses a porsche tiger engine!” “Nice argument lazarpig, but where’s your source?” “My source is I made it the fuck up!”

[@stuff9680]

The Brain Drain in Russia is a real thing, my parents worked for ITT in Upstate New York and within the span of 2 years the company hired 9 Russian Engineers, all new engineers from Moscow and St. Petersburg, all really smart and nice people and they all had the same reason for leaving Russia, the pay was better and economy was more stable

[@taranvirsekhon1896]

Can attest to this, we have a rental business over here in canada and many more russian IT proffesionals looking to rent from us compared to before 2019

[@morbidwoodpeckers]

let's see how in 10 years all of them, including your specialists, will flee to China

[@moonasha]

glad to hear at least some russians were able to immigrate here. Everyone I've talked to has said it's absurdly difficult to immigrate to the US

[@kolbyking2315]

​@@moonasha High cost, high benefits

[@parazitkolol]

Not to mention not being sent to Siberia for lightly critiquing the head man

[@robertmcnally9305]

The Abrams X is what happens when you give a company a budget worth more than the GDP of an entire country

[@Goober762]

And I love it

[@robertmcnally9305]

@@Goober762 same

[@arthas640]

The Abrams X program budget has thus far amounted to around $650 million, but that's not just an upgrade package but also functions as R&D for America's future tanks and other armored vehicles since it includes R&D for things like new autoloaders, better sensors and electronics including new augmented reality displays, better active defense systems, and a new cannon and those cannons can often be used for other vehicles (the original Abrams cannon was used on a handful of American, Israeli, South Korean, Turkish, Taiwanese, Egyptian, and even Soviet and Iranian tanks). Tanks are infamously expensive to research and develop which is why Russia hasnt developed a new real tank since the T-90 and why many countries, even ones with modern equipment, often use the same basic tank for 30+ years and just make upgrade packages.

[@wotwott2319]

*the gdp of several countries combined

[@arthas640]

@@wotwott2319 The Abrams X program is $650mil. There's only 1 country with an economy the fraction of that and that's the Vatican.

[@mostlymagical3220]

I did a quick google search on the subject of the T14’s engine. It’s a 38.8 liter engine which produces 840 horsepower. The challenger 2 is powered by a 26.6 liter engine which produces 1,200 horsepower. 400 more horsepower from 12 fewer liters. That’s what 84 years of engine development does.

[@worldoftancraft]

When you didn't learn how to use Google is when you declare the engine is twice less powerful and less efficient than your Bry'ysh pride

[@TheImperialSoviet]

The M1A2 SEP Version 4 Abrams has an engine that produces I think around 1,500 horsepower. Not sure about liters.

[@worldoftancraft]

@@TheImperialSoviet literally no chance since the first production batch in 1980's

[@TheImperialSoviet]

@@worldoftancraft wdym

[@worldoftancraft]

@@TheImperialSoviet autocorrection. It corrected «change» to «chance». The engine power haven't changed since the first production models of Abrams.

[@leonardomafrareina7634]

The T-14 Armata is said to be incredibly stealthy. I agree with these claims, they're absolutely right, after all, the T-14s are so stealthy they've never been spoted on the battlefield.

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Cringe. I saw hundreds of these comments last month, "produce something new for fuck's sake" - LazerPig

[@Virgan1209]

@@definitelyfrank9341 Lol, the Russian pig's arse is on fire.

[@leonardomafrareina7634]

@@definitelyfrank9341 No thanks, bro.

[@bhaashatepe5234]

@@leonardomafrareina7634 I remember the F117 'sorry, we did not know it's invisible' stealth aircraft.

[@jonnykban]

​@@leonardomafrareina7634 it was yet another video pushing the importance of the hugely irrelevant T14 Armata. They have what? a dozen of them.

[@dyanreoliveira4764]

You have to love that he drops a video on Russian tanks AND THEN Oryx shows that Russia is mobilising T-54/55s

[@Myriip]

The video of T-54/55 came before this video went live.

[@BoisegangGaming]

> Oryx Maybe this is just a gamer moment but my initial reaction was "what the hell is the Taken King doing in open source intelligence"

[@pax6833]

Challenger literally about to once again faceroll the soviet junk it was designed to fight because Russia has no modern tanks.

[@Gearhead221]

WHAT. That's pure desperation.

[@TheArklyte]

​@@Gearhead221 apparently those T-55's were in well preserved condition ie they're operable and can be shipped now. Which means that several thousands of T-72's Russia claimed to have at its disposal at moments notice aren't in any way, shape or form vehicles as much as part of landscape by now. They will slowly reassemble them in a rate of 10-100 husks to single tank(idk if copper wires survived local alcoholic prapors😅), but it'll take them years.

[@lpseudonyml]

Seeing LazerPig and Sumoto made me think a LazerPig and Internet Historian collaboration would be a welcome distraction from this neverending Kafkaesque nightmare.

[@gabrielfiol2311]

They need an in the field for War, that episode would be fire

[@shonuff9655]

Oh God yes

[@Odyssey233]

@@gabrielfiol2311 theres in the field for weapons which they talk about war a lot, but still a lot to go over lol

[@cola98765]

@@gabrielfiol2311 "war... WAR!... what is war?"

[@AmarFox6]

Please no

[@MilushevGeorgi]

An year later Bradley killed a t90 by taking out the optics

[@buinhat6427]

the prophecy has been fulfilled.

[@Anotherandomtrans]

I am still sad for the gunner, probably that guy losed fucking eye.

[@felipemontero1087]

@@AnotherandomtransI’m pretty sure the guy died after, so he wasn’t blind for long

[@Anotherandomtrans]

@@felipemontero1087 no the crew escaped, a thing of T-90 is are just good, we see all them destroyed but if you see stats you discover it is norma

[@felipemontero1087]

@@Anotherandomtrans the T-90 is a good and capable tank, not at the standard of what russian propaganda claims it to be, but still. The point I am making is that half of the crew of the T-90 died in that event. And I’m sure one of them was the gunner cause I don’t see a blinded guy surviving in the middle of the battlefield with 2 Bradley’s firing

[@autofox1744]

Fun Fact: The phone on the back of the tank is something the _Japanese_ came up with _in the 1930s._ The Type 95 Ha-Go, also known as the world's most kawaii armored vehicle, had one. It was an intercom for troops following along behind to talk to the tank crew, for those curious. Correction: I have been informed this feature actually dates all the way back to the British Mark I tank!

[@feekygucker2678]

The phone is something most tankers rip out to discourage infantry from standing next to a 40+ ton machine with poor visibility that might move at a moments notice.

[@myfacern7232]

Did you just call a tank kawaii? -.-

[@sol2544]

​@@Pilotmario "WEVE COME TO TALK ABOUT THE EXTENDED WARRANTY ON YOUR TANK"

[@falcovg2]

@@sol2544 I will respect telemarketeer/scammers more if they had to stand behind a 30+ ton tracked vehicle with a running engine to do their thing.

[@dougerrohmer]

"The caller you have dialed, is not available. Please deposit 25 minirublecenttypethings for another 3 minutes".

[@lovrogorupec7868]

“Tempting the HIMARS of fate” is my new favourite expression.

[@fluxthelycanroc9603]

Mine too. I'm gonna steal it

[@jloiben12]

There were a bunch of good one liners

[@jtjames79]

I have solution comrade. We make tank tank. We put fuel truck on tank chassis, and give armor. In post Soviet,Russia tank tank tanks you.

[@AlephTroll]

“Babe wake up! My targeted harassment campaign to get LazerPig to post another video finally worked!”

[@makuru.42]

Lazerpig gay

[@Kroozin.]

@@makuru.42 he is

[@myself2noone]

@Makuru_DD I think most of us have picked up on that yeah.

[@LeMeowAu]

​@@makuru.42 let's go I have a chance

[@Cris-ds3jh]

@wyattboucher6694 lol

[@burgirassist]

"Western tanks are 50 years behind cuz they dont have autoloaders" -random sweedish tank from the 40s:🗿👍

[@NotAGepard]

France the moment they got rid of those panthers: 🗿

[@Hrrrrrrrrrreng]

*The Strv-1 bumbling polish hardbass, and flying by like the Doritos it is in the background “We uh, don’t talk about him”

[@LurifaxDK]

After watching this it makes PERFECT sense now that Steven Seagal is an honorary Russian.

[@Chest_Rockwell1]

He’s a perfect fit in Russia because like Russia he’s a fake tough guy that thinks he’s totally badass while in reality everybody thinks he’s a joke and laughs at them

[@YaMrsisGopping]

@@Chest_Rockwell1 Steven seagal is an absolute cretin, but I doubt you’d be laughing at the Russians when there throwing rounds at you and shelling you’re positions.

[@pashayasinskiy6133]

@@Chest_Rockwell1 Why u liberal fags cry much about us, if Russia is just a fake?!)

[@danieltobin4498]

“I’m a Russian Mongol” -Steven Seagal

[@Ironman1o1]

@@Chest_Rockwell1 Runs from real fights too. Look up the Seagal/JCVD feud.

[@TBH-nu2so]

Let’s just appreciate the fact that Lazerpig was contracted to make 1 ad and he made 5 1/2 instead.

[@ramonandrajo6348]

The USA sheep are pathetic. XD

[@trevorgough2286]

Best advert I've ever heard.

[@kyleleeson4498]

LazerPig has some of the only adds I will not skip through because they are so damn funny.

[@dod_the_angel]

​@@kyleleeson4498 he nicked the idea of the last ad from Martincitopants lol

[@mqqb]

@@kyleleeson4498 Yes, these and I also never skip ads from Internet Historian

[@josephjohnson5779]

“What can happen if we shut down a few schools and give that money to General Dynamics.” One of my favorite quotes now.

[@DirkusTurkess]

Atleast the tank will be involved in less shooting than those schools. I'd see that as a win.

[@amorencinteroph3428]

At least if we give the money to General Dynamics they'll give us the product we paid for, lol

[@xBINARYGODx]

if only we could raise taxes on a particular kind of person, perhaps will tons of money, to pay for both. Heaven forbid.

[@d3nza482]

@@xBINARYGODx Butbutbut... won't someone think of the poor oligarchs? Did I say oligarchs? I meant hard working by-own-bootstraps billionaires.

[@MediumRareOpinions]

​@@xBINARYGODx Lovely but naive idea, as they're so adept at shuffling assets around the loophole ridden system as to make such a proposal so laughably ineffective it constitutes a net loss in legislative coats to enact. You won't close the loopholes either because there not a bug, they're a feature.

[@skorza212]

Ruskies are playing 4-d chess here - How can it suck if it never sees combat? It’s K/D ratio is infinite, so on paper it’s as effective as the F-15.

[@charlyspor7594]

Dear God you're right!!! Hell it's even stealthier than the f22. We've never spotted it during combat either!!

[@AS-bm8fy]

Laserpig is one of only a few KZbinrs that have me sit through a 6 minute long sponsored segment without having the need to skip through it. Well done Mister pig, well done

[@pupkinson8914]

well done! By sponsoring terror in Ukraine. that gmae is made by rusian company. they paid taxes to a government and, therefore, sponsoring killing Ukrainian. Have a great game session!

[@Asrtyulg]

Same. No way I'd have watched on most channels. I've seen too many, but Lazerpig does it better

[@Skarry]

One other would be comm entetiquette

[@Pahang.bend17]

Not me, cant give wargaming anything they suck

[@MrWrongoStarr]

The thrush bit got me good

[@aluminumfalcon552]

The T-14's biggest weapon is making people dizzy watching the turret spin around and around and around.

[@dagmarbelesova4284]

You spin me right 'round, baby right 'round

[@LPVince94]

"Sir they're just driving back and forth spinning the turret clockwise."

[@anotherordinaryfellow6935]

​@@LPVince94 "Lmao bro thought he's in WoT💀" "Ong" *Tank Destroyed* *Penetration* *1•400 Exp* *Voiceline emits from inside*

[@Thect]

If it spins a little faster, it'll take off and transform into it's flying tank mode

[@definitelyfrank9341]

According to western 'experts' if a vehicle drive 'breaks down' (even though it didn't), suffers from delays in serial production and some software bugs persist it is a shit and useless tank. There are tanks that have been stuck between the development phase and production phase for much much longer than T-14 despite being far less revolutionary, such as the Turkish Altay tank.

[@armesbgood8671]

That turret spinning in every single shot is actually pissing me off.

[@CallanElliott]

Yeah, you'd swear they'd just invented the automated horizontal turret drive.

[@Project_VideoGame]

no, they welded the turret to the engine

[@martinjrgensen8234]

It is good action shot comrade

[@Shadow25720]

The turret launch system has not been implemented yet.

[@goldengolem4670]

Just imagine they are trying to fly like in that one gif

[@Thunderbox247]

58:55 that aged like fine wine

[@crabroll1681]

How so?

[@Thunderbox247]

@@crabroll1681 he talks about the Bradley trashing the optics of a Russian tank and how ever long ago (can't be bothered checking when) two Ukrainian Bradleys knocked out a T-90M by smashing the optics, thus proving the Pigs point

[@afamiliarfriend]

A little more context about the "touchscreens" at 8:12. Back in the early 2000s my mom worked on a proof of concept demonstration of a future submarine command system. In doing so she got to use a touchscreen. She said that the touchscreen that she used during the demonstration was more reliable than the one in that clip. However she also stated that of the four screens in front of her only one was a touchscreen and when she wanted the others to change she would hit a button on the touchscreen to change whatever other screen. So while I have no proof, given the choreographed nature of the clip I think it's possible that someone was meant to hit a button somewhere and missed their cue. Edit: The demonstration my mom worked on was a destroyer's command system, not a submarine. In the demonstration an enemy submarine is targeted, hence my confusion.

[@8waverider9]

Russian electronics for ya, it’s even worse on the aircraft.

[@kingsnakke6888]

@@8waverider9 So bad that they _literally taped civilian GPS devices_ in the cockpit

[@jont2576]

that touchscreen probably cost like $10,000 along with apple's most expensive workstation to power it. and it was not more "reliable" alright......and u telling me ur mom is watching a youtube video about a t14 armata by some guy named lazer pig with you? lmao....jesus did u grow up in the 00s or 90s and witness the kind of technology we had back then? i remember my hp external cd writer had a read/write speed of 2x or about 700kb/s.....mind u that is still godlike compared to the internet speeds back then......dialup was about 5kb/s and adsl 30kb/s.writing 700mb of info onto a cd literally took 45 mins. today u could take any samsung galaxy tab s and slap it in a tank and it would work better than any touchscreen in history. in fact i wonder why dont the russian army just jury rigged a bunch of samsung tab and use it as a console

[@salted6422]

@@kingsnakke6888 is was to fool stupid americans russia first to space comrade)) /s

[@BVonBuescher]

I’m sure it was the Romas fault … blyat

[@juanmanuelpenaloza9264]

Russia: Can barely spend enough to make its concept vehicles. USA: Casually builds a functional gundam with leftover money from that year's budget.

[@sonofjack6286]

Also USA: Wait, maybe I should've put that money towards making sure that the schools can functionally a little more soundly next year, and so infrastructure is a bit better. Sadly I already built the Gundam so we're stuck with it. Damn my military-industrial complex.

[@sctumminello]

You laugh but i've read that DARPA built a fully functional powerloader ala Aliens and was beginning to consider potential combat utilities when the project was nixed due to emission and fuel economy issues. 'Sides the US would be more likely to build a Mad Cat mech or a Warlord titan before a Gundam.

[@createdforthemoment6740]

@@sonofjack6286 that's how Gundam school anime start

[@Klaaism]

And we still find the right arm of a 19yr old faster and more reliable than an autoloader.

[@juanmanuelpenaloza9264]

@@Klaaism All those years of jackin' it sure did pay off...

[@blackhawk15897]

This just supports my theory that the only thing the Russian MIC is good for is making cool looking designs to equip the bad guy's forces with in Hollywood Movies.

[@anonymousunknown4811]

Walking assets for Hollywood's Russian casts

[@ladywaffle2210]

A very important niche to fill

[@wile123456]

And videogames in 10 or so years when the war on Ukraine becomes a centerpiece to kill Russian soldiers

[@MrZarthalan]

And even more important than that Making sure top tier russia in war thunder is strong

[@frenchguitarguy1091]

Kinda reminds me of the Nazis who progressively built bigger, more fuel thirsty and impractical tanks and other 'wonder weapons'

[@leburger5160]

I mean, the one thing Russian bots are right about is that the west at large isn't willing to suffer the casualty rates that would mount from a modern conflict. Every conflict since the end of the Second World War has seen massive waves of negative public sentiment directed squarely at the mounting casualties resulting from said conflicts. It indicates two different mindsets. The west at large values life far more than our eastern counterparts. The hard man mentality isn't as prevalent here. In Russia thats mentality is king. If you aren't a hard man, you're seen as weak and ineffective. Hence why they're willing to sacrifice far more men in a conflict than we are.... Beyond that, they have literally zero advantage over any of their perceived adversaries...

[@MonaroMan-j6j]

If a global conflict (i.e. World War 3) breaks out, then the casualty rates the West is willing to tolerate will increase, as casualty rates are a consequence of a conventional war. Russia would lose its hard man advantage in that case even though in battle the West still tries to minimise casualties whereas the Russians use their soldiers like Cannon Fodder. The Russian strategy only works if you have more men than the enemy has the ammunition to take out, like they did at Stalingrad in WW2. The Ukraine will resist the Russians for as long as the West feeds them the ammunition.

[@keaixiaomeinv]

Never has the KZbin algorithm recommended me a video that is over one hour long that I ended up watching from start to finish in one sitting. This is the most savage diss track of Russia, Putinism, and the T14 that I have ever seen. Infinitely insightful, constantly hilarious, thank you, good sir.

[@JULIAN11.]

If you liked this video I highly recommend his other videos, some of them are related to Russia and some aren't, but all of them share this kind humour and quality

[@rayfighter]

same here, enjoyed the delivery a lot

[@matains88]

I didn't realize this was an hour long video until i was half way in and i still watched till the end, even after leaving my pc for a while. This never happens. The detail is unbelievable. I can only imagine how much time was spent on this video.

[@BNRmatt]

Watch Perun. Less overtly funny, but super informative.

[@TheFirebird123456]

​@@BNRmatt took the words right from my fingers.😂

[@Djmack1992]

American military, "Nope, we don't have anything cool or weird in production." Everyone, "Then what's all this cool and weird stuff we keep seeing?" American military, "can't talk about it, goodbye." Russia, "We have SO many cool things!" Everyone, "Cool! Where are they?" Russia, "Secret 😊"

[@Michael-ex8lk]

Also America: "Hey look! Aliens!"

[@michaelbarnard8529]

@@Michael-ex8lk”Aliens” is the gift that keeps on giving for military secrets. Even recently, with the release of footage obviously created by various optics effects (blurry foreground birds, water droplets on lenses, etc.).

[@oz314]

So basically the same.

[@NeurodivergentSuperiority]

America is just humbling themselves, despite being barely humble at all

[@torifin755]

@@oz314 not really. because america shows you the cool shit, says its not cool and refuses to elaborate. where russia, says they have cool shit, is asked where it is. and refuses to elaborate.

[@siliconvalleyengineer5875]

The T14 turret actually blows up into the air higher than the T72 which is awesome.

[@mikedittsche]

so you are saying there is progress? See silly westoids?! New T-14 better!

[@pedromiguel748]

Better tank, turret fly to space! Kills aliens for mother Russia!

[@gauloiseguy]

It probably will rotate doing so which will add value.

[@waltergoodwin7463]

I had to read this twice and the laughter that follow I could not stop not realizing how loud on this floor at the VA hospital. You have made my night along with the video. Thank you so much.👏👍🌷

[@cdgonepotatoes4219]

@@gauloiseguy it adds to the stability, doesn't tumble as much

[@rooster6461]

The commie bots are still getting their panties in a twist over this 😂 Where are those T-14’s bud?

[@patrickswayze3086]

The person doing the english narration for the russian tank documentary sounded like a skyrim npc. Good to know that the voice actor for balimund the riften blacksmith is getting work. He was a good friend to me

[@RorikH]

The Russians wish they could afford Balimund. Their fire salts are probably just rock salt with some chili powder mixed in.

[@greygrey7096]

About that T14 spinning in every shot: its very likley they did this to cover the lack of gun stabilisation. The turret spins in almost all shots of the tank moving through rough terrain. All other tank promotional videos use offroading to showcase stabilisation. Armata has the gun locked in salute and spins... prettey sure they didnt properly integrate a good stabi system yet.

[@andylaw3222]

Why does this remind me of the clip from a german tank that is so stable, it was able to balance a glass of beer while driving...

[@garyslayton8340]

​@@andylaw3222that was actully impressive

[@andylaw3222]

@@garyslayton8340 gotta have your priorities🍺

[@shirghazaycowboys]

Lazerpig, for years I had to listen about this fucking thing. For context I'm a former Marine tank crewman, back when we had tanks. 2011-2015, 2nd Tank BTN Delta/Charlie Company (deployed to Afghanistan in 13', yes M1a1s were in Afghanistan). For years it was "oh god! The new Russian mega tank!" "It has cameras!!!" "It's totally new! The Abrams killer!" The moment the guys and I got a look at one online and actually saw the major design features we asked a few questions about the very defects you brought up. Never an answer, not from the frothing fanboys and doomers anyways. Glad to know years later we're validated about it being another Russian piece of overhyped vaporware.

[@electricspeedkiller8950]

Sad.

[@rashnuofthegoldenscales4512]

You mean you were deployed in the Afghanistan where you were routed from last year by a bunch of sandals-wearing mountain herders armed with AKs? :))))))))))))))

[@wwlb4970]

It's actually sad anyone doubted it in the first place, except us, Eastern Europeans, who have a good understanding how Russia's been working for centuries.

[@rashnuofthegoldenscales4512]

@@wwlb4970 You will say whatever pleases your Western master just to get back at the Russians. Everybody knows you are a supine and lowly bunch :)))))))))))

[@GodAdministrator]

Yep =) We all sow how Abramses showed itself in Afgan and Irak =))) I think you new some of this names: RPG-7, Kornet, Konkurs, Fagot and etc... Did you like it? =)))) And would you like to meet in real combat T-72 3BM? Old soviet peice of shit with missle in its arsenal? Welcome! Guys. Try to intimidate anyone but not Russians. You still can't forget Vietnam and how you were crushed there by russians

[@macgeorge8229]

And it looks like the Armata just got shit caned.

[@Deaglan753]

This video actually explains why my Russian friend who was in the army 2 years before the Russo Ukraine war, holds no love for both the Russian army and the war Nowadays he is his own boss as a jeweller and I do hope he is doing well

[@jjcoola998]

Hopefully he got out of there or can avoid mobilization

[@markjohnattwood8985]

Good, uk

[@esmeecampbell7396]

Hopefully no longer in Russia or he will likely be called up soon. If he is then time to sell up everything he can, put what stock he has left in a suitcase and try to escape to Finland or something lol

[@d3nza482]

Look up dedovshchina. He probably has many, many more reasons for hating Russian army than what was presented in the video above. Starting with the fact that it is a military which adopted the new and unproven, space age technology of socks - in 2013. Supposedly. It is not a metaphor or a NATO designation. They used "footwraps" AKA rags to wrap their feet until then. And as is the custom, created a whole "culture" about how good it was that they smell. Just ask Ukrainians who has a farewell ceremony to foot wraps when they switched over to socks in 2007. Then in 2022, Russia started reissuing footwraps (portyanki) again. After never stopping issuing them. Because, when you need to send a few hundred thousand people to be used as cannon fodder real quick, producing a "one size fits all" boot really speeds up the process. How do you make a size 34-49 boot you ask? Simple! You make a size 49 boot and keep wrapping the foot until it fits. BTW, ever noticed how much Putin looks like Dobby?

[@James-9999]

That’s what I’m saying dude, every Russian I know was also against this, to the point where they literally apologized for their country, seems like the only Russians that are for it are the ones on tv.

[@ChrisSchryer81]

Presenting the T-14 Armata: The world's most heavily armored helicopter.

[@needtau4138]

That doesn't fly 💀

[@jens4857]

The Abrams's gas turbine is nothing more than literally a derivative of a helicopter turbine. You guys are so biased you dont even realise that what you just watched is basically the evolution of any diesel engine.

[@kyodairiker]

​@@needtau4138 guess you're too dumb to get the joke

[@nerd1344]

​@@jens4857 bro... he said it because the turret was spinning ontop... like a helicopters propellers ontop... you idiot lol

[@dragonace119]

@@jens4857 What fumes you huffing there? Since you seem to be too blind to realise allow me to say it to you, he was referring to how over 90% of the footage (thats pubically availble) of the T-14 has the thing spinning its turret constantly.

[@Harry.said.so.]

My cousin sends me a picture of russia shipping T-55s to the front and then an hour later a lazerpig tank video comes out, excellent.

[@perioriginalversion9645]

Great timing

[@AlreadyTakenTag]

Those might have actually been T-54s which would be even more crazy

[@bmwman1981]

@@AlreadyTakenTag standard issue for the Russian army drag some scrap out of storage and send it with some canon fodder inside and hope it lasts more then a few weeks

[@Alvi410]

Still a better fighting machine than the T-14 Armata

[@fishyfish6050]

​@@AlreadyTakenTag As far as i know its a mix of both probably the differences there being that the T-54 as far as i know cant fire Apfsds rounds

[@phantomplays1109]

The fact that Lazer brings up the bradley, then a year ish later a bradley runs a T-90M's fade is actually incredible

[@Mr_Phage]

Was definitely not expecting an hour long deep dive on Russian tanks to be this hilarious and well written.

[@CommanderBeefDev]

ikr, i saw lazer pig and rolled my eyes, then watched entire video

[@CommanderBeefDev]

@Russia Bro Z (You know, like Dragonball Z lol) nice troll name, me giz it 4 of 5

[@andrewthorpe3219]

Once past the WoW promotion, which was very cringy, the video was really good.

[@overcorpse]

@@andrewthorpe3219 Then why aren't you using Sponsorblock like normal people?

[@bear76009]

@@overcorpse because every now and then someone needs to oh say eat

[@jloiben12]

2021: Russia is claimed to be the second best military in the world. 2023: Russia is the second best military in Russia (edit - 2023: Russia has the third best military in Russia)

[@MrMate2Mate]

If you count Ukraine's Traktor Brigade separately, Russia isn't even the second most powerful army in Ukraine 😂

[@lordorion5776]

@@MrMate2Mate yeah but he didn't say Ukraine he said "second best military in Russia" referring to the Russian Legion of Freedom as the better military in Russian territory

[@brucemourad7390]

russia is winning kid.... lmao you talking trash, ukraine is number 500000

[@AcePilot_]

@@brucemourad7390 yeah man keep inhaling your copium, your three day special military operation is going precisely as planned

[@DuplexWeevil337]

​@@brucemourad7390are you medicaly insane?

[@daemonofdecay]

Russian Logic: "T-14 can't suck if we never use in combat. Remain paper tiger. Is big brain move, Ivan."

[@M4rk58]

Can never lose if you never fight. 0% loss rate, take that NATO

[@Typexviiib]

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt

[@AkaSora96]

@@Typexviiib if only russia thought about that before their big oopsy on february 2022

[@trolleriffic]

@@AkaSora96 Getting called on a bluff is one thing, but exposing your own BS to the entire world is next level incompetence. The US notably had a seaborne nuclear deterrent that in its first iteration (Polaris A1) had serious reliability issues with both the rocket and its warhead - only 2 of the 16 warheads carried by each sub were likely to reach their targets and then explode, but they weren't stupid enough to tell the world! They kept it under wraps while the problems got fixed, but that's the other key point - they actually fixed those issues because the money to fund the work went into the hands of engineers and wasn't stolen by the top brass.

[@Typexviiib]

@@AkaSora96 indeed. Don't worry though, 10 years after their humiliating performance in ukraine leaves the daily news millions will get online to proclaim "Russia strong". Some people never learn.

[@rocksnot952]

Fun fact - the Bradley has killed more T-72s than the Abrams.

[@danieltobin4498]

That might change now that Ukraine has Abrams tanks

[@tiedeman39]

​@danieltobin4498 Ukraine also has Bradley's though

[@John2r1]

​@@tiedeman39 They have M1 Abrams 31 of them. Guess how many have been destroyed.. Answer: Zero.

[@tiedeman39]

@John2r1 Yeah? The conversation is about Bradley's vs Abrams taking out T-72s, though, not which one has been lost more.

[@John2r1]

@tiedeman39 I know that. But considering how Russian propaganda is I figured one of the bots would be triggered. Besides the Bradley already holds the record for most T-72s killed in a single war. The Bradley took out more tanks in the Gulf War than the Abrams or any other tank in the war, for that matter. At this point, we should stop saying that Bradley's aren't tanks and start saying tanks aren't bradley's.

[@TechLeafRanger]

And now, my top 5 Armata turret spinning jokes. 1. I guess T-14 crews are fans of Dead Or Alive's 'You Spin Me Round'. 2. Oh great, Ivan got plastered on vodka and is sleeping off his hangover on the turret control again. 3. "Drive me closer, I want to hit them with my barrel!"- Armata tank commander, probably. 4. The turret on the Armata goes round and round. Round and round. Round and round. The turret on the Armata goes round and round. All through the town. 5. "Look, if we break the turret ring on this thing, maybe Putin won't send us to die in Ukraine!"

[@ragalyiakos]

A couple days after you, someone commented "It is said that Chuck Norris roundhouse kicked the design documents of the T-14, causing the turret to forever spin."

[@jamesparis9426]

Is controller drift.

[@DSPHistoricalSociety]

100% for effort

[@winkletown8828]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@gunnerbhb50]

Actually they were trying out the VTOL system on that model but it failed too 🤣

[@Avionicx]

I love the jab at the Abrams, Leo and Merkava. "They don't have autoloader so they're behind us" The Japanese with a 3 second autoloader in the Type 90 and Type 10, both made before the T-14:

[@stranger6797]

I searched for almost an hour and couldn't find a single source with proof that t14's reload speed is 10s, do you or this pig have any source or are you just making things up?

[@royalhydra9790]

@@stranger6797 Then what do the russian sources say is the loading speed?

[@liambooker8602]

@@royalhydra9790 Russia claims 10 to 12 rounds a minute, which means a reload speed of 5 or 6 seconds. Because Russian technical claims are often heavily exaggerated for propaganda, the T14’s actual reloading speed is likely a lot slower then that.

[@ThatZenoGuy]

@@liambooker8602 5-6 seconds wouldn't be out of the ordinary for a modern autoloader handling such large rounds. In any case that's a good enough rate of fire.

[@MLaak86]

@@ThatZenoGuy Yeah but top rate US teams can do it in 2-3 seconds so they're putting more down range in the same time.

[@michaelimbesi2314]

The “hard to judge speed” thing is so true. Being an American, I live near train tracks. I like to watch the trains go by sometimes. If you stand on the station platform as a freight train goes by, it looks to be moving insanely fast, easily highway speed. And yet the speed limit for that section is 40mph for freight trains, and they do more like 38 mph there because they’re climbing a noticeable hill.

[@MostlyPennyCat]

When the Intercity 125s go through a train station they don't stop at here in the UK it sure seems like there's going 125mph. And it's engines are LOUD

[@t.e.sprocketeering]

@@MostlyPennyCat One of my favourite things to observe, that is. You can feel it with almost every sense and it’s awesome.

[@acephantom903]

My local freight track was upgraded for Brightline (78mph speed limit) and the freight train is allowed to go 60 mph now. The fastest I've clocked them at was 48 in the middle of the night. Even then that was scary fast for a mile long freight train.

[@hedgehog3180]

I also feel like I notice it in War Thunder sometimes, occasionally I'll be like "wow I'm going so fast right now" and then I'll look at my speed and it's like 58 km/h, slower than a car on a highway and a speed I have managed to reach on a stationary bike. We just tend to judge speed by how many noticeable objects go by per second and on a road that's not a lot since they're roads and flats but since tanks drive on rugged terrains there'll be many noticeable terrain features and objects going by per second, plus dirt and snow being kicked up. And y'know humans don't come equipped from natures side with the ability to judge speeds much in excess of like 20 km/h since that's the absolute fastest we might reach. Anything above that just registers as fast to us, and especially if it's a big object because then it's more dangerous.

[@shronkler1994]

stil highway speed if you want to be an ass to everyone else

[@mashirohakase]

that part at 59:00 aged so well ! especially with the recent videos of M2 Bradley smashing a T-90M sight to bits ! :D

[@Маслорий-ц4о]

2 bradleys, fpv drones, crew survived, and one of the bradleys was destroyed

[@trashdoge1217]

​@@Маслорий-ц4оme when brainrot

[@murphy7801]

​@@Маслорий-ц4оnah we all see the video 😂

[@BoD-v8p]

​@@Маслорий-ц4о Oh the sweet cope Imagine if they had m3s now 😮😂

[@12123188]

​@@Маслорий-ц4оshhhhhhhhh.....let them live in their fairytales.

[@jarvy251]

"Then suddenly, this device [Autoloader] appears on the MOST ADVANCED NATO TANK - The LeClerc" It's delivered like a punchline I absolutely lost it

[@MrGreg771]

ukrainian need more BS like this...keep up dude Of course Ukraine will win…a lollipop from Putin

[@malithaw]

damn your humour sucks

[@JohnSmith-mk5jt]

It's like the dude reading the script had to just pause for a second to comprehend what he was reading, all the while thinking, "How the hell will anyone buy this garbage?"

[@ramonandrajo6348]

The USA sheep are pathetic. XD

[@valfar2015]

The thing is its french tanks in the 50's which had the first autoloader in tanks si France just retake its technology in 90's for the Leclerc

[@mechs_with_hands]

Night Time in WW3 Abrahms Crewman: "Excuse me Sir? Can we change our thermal signature to Lada again?" Abrahms Commander: "Yeah, do it. That shit's hilarious." Tankski Commandovitch: "Why is that Lada doing 40 across a field?"

[@Shadow25720]

"Whoever that is, that guy knows how to tune a Lada.

[@himoffthequakeroatbox4320]

* Abrams

[@nikivanov1833]

Lada doing 40 in a field, is part of the technical requirements. Fun Lada fact: When going above 100km/h Dubstep automatically starts to play.

[@FlowIrec]

That's a well-tuned Lada!

[@AntonGudenus]

@@nikivanov1833 Hardbass to be exact.

[@sawyernorthrop4078]

The brain drain angle is so true and often forgotten. I'm a college student studying engineering, and probably a good third of the professors in my department and other STEM departments are from former Soviet bloc countries

[@keith6706]

I work in Canada and a fair number of the engineers I encounter were born in Russia or, if old enough, the USSR.

[@andyfriederichsen]

It's especially true for many third-world nations.

[@whitegoose2017]

@@keith6706 It's not only engineers. Here in Finland so many people in medical professions have Slavic names. Hristozoff doesn't exactly sound like a Finnish name. Or Tatyana. The brain drain has affected every sector of Russian society.

[@Salty99]

They’re mostly sleeper agents. Never underestimate the only world power that has stood toe to toe against the Nazis and single handedly whooped them as well stood against the US for 30 or so years…

[@georgyekimov4577]

I AM THE BRAIN DRAIN actually not i moved out far to late to actually impact anything but both my parents are an exaple of it

[@fiftycal1]

The T-14 has proven to be a very valuable tank. You can study it - and learn how not to design a tank.

[@tiggerpete]

I'd love a remake of Pentagon wars but it's in Russia about the t-14, I think you could make a highly entertaining comedy of errors over it.

[@dreaming4056]

@@tiggerpete No he's telling the truth

[@tiggerpete]

@@dreaming4056 I wasn't disagreeing with his point though?

[@spindash64]

It’s like a time displaced Nega-Sherman: one looks like a ferocious tank that somehow misses everything important for a tank, the other looks like a child’s crayon drawing that manages to put QoL features for the time period together by complete accident

[@ebperformance8436]

How dare you mock the T-14…it’s turret will be able to fly higher than a T-72. We are installing parachutes on the T-14s turret….we put conscript safety first! A conscript can be killed from a falling turret.

[@OR56]

LazerPig actually predicted, Simpsons style, exactly what would happen to that T-90 when it tried to fight 2 Bradleys

[@tonyennis1787]

The amount of time the T-14 spends in these clips rotating its turret is hilarious.

[@WinVisten]

Almost like the turret aiming program is glitched.

[@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830]

Uhh it actually has inbuilt radar system in its turret being able to track football sized objects up to 2000km away, lock on and shoot a ground to air missiles (bet you didn't know besides anti tank missiles it can also fire anti aircraft ones from its main gun hehe) out of its gun flying at mach 50, the spinning is this advanced piece of supreme tech being on air defense mode

[@ivanivonovich9863]

They can't find the switch to turn it off!

[@KuDastardly]

_"Helicopter Helicopter"_ I think the Armata is just jealous of the other older tanks because they can launch their turrets hundreds of feet into the air so it's trying to spin its turret as fast as it can to launch its turret up like a chopper, lol!

[@Virtzus]

It is simply ready to curve its shots at all times.

[@ArchaeopteryxGaming]

A small addition to the engineer tanks based on tank chassis: they must be able to pull tanks. In order to be able to pull heavy weights, the pulling vehicle usually has to be heavy as well, so it is a necessity to use a heavy chassis.

[@ricardokowalski1579]

agreed. The recovery vehicles may be the only ones that require the actual tank chassis Everything else? Nope

[@mcelravys]

Usually a recovery vehicle does that. In the US these belong to unit maintenance, not the engineers.

[@nbewarwe]

@@ricardokowalski1579 Other tanks maybe.

[@evilshews]

I note that arvs, sometimes come under direct fire when recovering vehicles. But almost always have extended hull length, as stability for the rotator winches, and crane. Modern ARV'S have to be big, for the gear, and for stability when manipulating a damaged tank.

[@MrChickennugget360]

ya that confused me because in the US recovery vehicles are owned by the mechanics. Our ARVs are different than the Engineering vehicles.

[@chrislj2890]

Little known fact, the turret acts as a windup key for the spring that actually propels the tank.

[@no3ironman11100]

And it plays a little ballerina song "Dudu dudu Durudududu duda duda, duda, duuu"

[@notme9816]

​@@no3ironman11100 " Camptown ladies sing this song - duda - duda - dei etc "

[@Jan021981]

Yes, one could see what happens, when rotation stops at the parade in moscow.

[@highroller6244]

Oh my god, i laughed so hard on that comment 😂😂😂

[@margusevisalu7776]

Yeah, the gunners are the best 360 noscopers