Lec 22 | MIT 9.00SC Introduction to Psychology, Spring 2011

[@sharatchandrakanth]

Lecture 1 - Introduction Lecture 2 - Science and Research Lecture 3 - Brain I - Structure and Functions Lecture 4 - Brain II - Methods of Research Lecture 5 - Vision I Lecture 6 - Vision II Lecture 7 - Attention Lecture 8 - Consciousness Lecture 9 - Learning Lecture 10 - Memory I Lecture 11 - Memory II - Amnesia and Memory Systems Lecture 12 - Language Lecture 13 - Thinking Lecture 14 - Intelligence Lecture 15 - Emotion and Motivation Lecture 16 - Personality Lecture 17 - Child Development Lecture 18 - Adult Development Lecture 19 - Stress Lecture 20 - Psychopathology I Lecture 21 - Psychopathology II Lecture 22 - Social Psychology I Lecture 23 - Social Psychology II Lecture 24 - Conclusions - Evolutionary Psychology, Happiness

[@Fanaro]

So many of the experiment results in this lecture were drawn from mostly college undergrads... I wish the professor had put more emphasis on that, and maybe mentioned that these experiments were also replicated on other cohorts of the population...

[@RobertoLion]

at 15:22 he says: "Memorizing what you were hearing as well.", but he said before that the video doesn't have the voice of the woman.

[@kennethgarcia25]

Regarding Bystander Effect: In the cost-to-benefit and risk calculation of the CNS, there is a clear cost to act, an unclear cost of not acting or an unclear benefit for acting, and a higher risk of being criticized or, more saliently, falling victim themselves for acting when others are not acting. It is easy to achieve a correct assessment after the fact, but in the moment it may be unclear what actually is happening. Gabrieli contextualizes the mechanism in terms of a need to please others, but who wants to be the guy who is the first to see what's wrong with the collapsed patient in the ER hallway with the rash who turns out to be an Ebola or Anthrax patient? Any chance they are going to save anyone? Any chance that being socially ostracized for their behavior will be their highest concern?

[@Graveboy]

fêz ZZ z ZZ

[@jasonmichael8012]

In the future I owe you at least a non Cheegg paper

[@brainstormingsharing1309]

Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

[@clydemcmahon9884]

As social psychology increasingly understands human societies, they will be able to interfere more and more in the system.😁

[@davidfost5777]

I'm always looking for new interesting lectures on Psychology/Philosophy, please let me know if you guys have any recommendations, would be highly appreciated

[@RogerSmith-ee4zi]

Sign up for Coursera courses on those subjects

[@RobertoLion]

Would someone please explain the research at 15:30?

[@Entheos84]

The study wanted to answer the question: Does it take extra effort to stop yourself from attributing a persons actions to the person, instead of the situation that person is in? Basically trying to prove the schema at 13:20. One group gets the task to judge why a person is acting either relaxed or stressed because of the topic they are discussing. Because they have only one task they have the extra energy or effort left to say: The person is not acting relaxed or stressed because it is in their personality or character but they are acting this way because they are being put into an anxious situation. The other group has to use more of their brain power. They have to use up the extra effort because they get two tasks. Assign the actions of the person to their personality or character or because they are being put into an anxious situation. (just like the first group) However they have to memorize at the same time aswell. By having to memorize they use up the extra energy or effort to correct their thinking about that person. They do not have the energy left to say: It was not the person who is anxious by their nature it was the surroundings causing this. To make it simple the experiment proved: If you have mental resources left you correct yourself and say: It was not the person, it was the situation. If you do not have mental resources left you do not correct yourself and say: It was the person. I hope I clarified it for you and people in the future who are reading this :)

[@RamdacV]

Our system was designed by the illuminist philosophers of the 18th century, who had little knowledge of how society works. As social psychology increasingly understands human societies, they will be able to interfere more and more in the system. We can speculate how the future of our social system will be in the light of this knowledge.

[@lgbt2686]

still bad so far

[@NazriB]

Lies again? King Power

[@RobertoLion]

The video at 1:34 is this one kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaekfJmaltNjl9E

[@shanakajayalath3026]

First removed clip kzbin.info/www/bejne/eJi1oJyKjNB1frc

[@ehza]

thanks

[@vamshi5745]

39:30 really scares me to live in this world... And it is US... What about indian peoples 🙏